PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Replication stress response”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

The fission yeast Crb2/Chk1 pathway coordinates the DNA damage and spindle checkpoint in response to replication stress induced by topoisomerase I inhibitor.

Living organisms experience constant threats that challenge their genome stability. The DNA damage checkpoint pathway coordinates cell cycle progression with DNA repair when DNA is damaged, thus ensuring faithful transmission of the genome. The spindle assembly checkpoint inhibits chromosome segregation until all chromosomes are properly attached to the spindle, ensuring accurate partition of the genetic material. Both the DNA damage and spindle checkpoint pathways participate in genome integrity. However, no clear connection between these two pathways has been described. Here, we analyze mutants in the BRCT domains of fission yeast Crb2, which mediates Chk1 activation, and provide evidence for a novel function of the Chk1 pathway. When the Crb2 mutants experience damaged replication forks upon inhibition of the religation activity of topoisomerase I, the Chk1 DNA damage pathway induces sustained activation of the spindle checkpoint, which in turn delays metaphase-to-anaphase transition in a Mad2-dependent fashion. This new pathway enhances cell survival and genome stability when cells undergo replicative stress in the absence of a proficient G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint.

Alleles↗

Replication stress links Geminin depletion to centrosome amplification.

The timing of DNA replication and centrosome duplication is tightly regulated with cell cycle progression to ensure the faithful duplication of the genome during cell division. Both DNA and centrosomes are licensed for replication in late telophase/early G1, replicated in S phase and segregated during mitosis; yet how defects in DNA replication licensing are coupled to centrosome homeostasis remains poorly understood. Here, we show that depletion of the replication licensing inhibitor Geminin in proliferating mouse embryonic fibroblasts induces robust centrosome amplification together with impaired primary cilium assembly. Rather than promoting whole-genome reduplication, knockdown of Geminin triggers a replication stress response, characterized by DNA damage accumulation throughout the cycle, and activation of an ATR-dependent DNA damage response. Mechanistically, Geminin depletion-induced replication stress activates the ATR-Chk1-Wee1 checkpoint axis prolonging G2 and leading to premature centriole disengagement and centrosome amplification. These findings identify replication stress as the signaling module that couples defective DNA replication licensing to centrosome amplification.

DNA damage↗

Suppression of spontaneous genome rearrangements in yeast DNA helicase mutants.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants lacking two of the three DNA helicases Sgs1, Srs2, and Rrm3 exhibit slow growth that is suppressed by disrupting homologous recombination. Cells lacking Sgs1 and Rrm3 accumulate gross-chromosomal rearrangements (GCRs) that are suppressed by the DNA damage checkpoint and by homologous recombination-defective mutations. In contrast, rrm3, srs2, and srs2 rrm3 mutants have wild-type GCR rates. GCR types in helicase double mutants include telomere additions, translocations, and broken DNAs healed by a complex process of hairpin-mediated inversion. Spontaneous activation of the Rad53 checkpoint kinase in the rrm3 mutant depends on the Mec3/Rad24 DNA damage sensors and results from activation of the Mec1/Rad9-dependent DNA damage response rather than the Mrc1-dependent replication stress response. Moreover, helicase double mutants accumulate Rad51-dependent Ddc2 foci, indicating the presence of recombination intermediates that are sensed by checkpoints. These findings demonstrate that different nonreplicative helicases function at the interface between replication and repair to maintain genome integrity.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

Linker Histone H1 Phosphorylation Promotes DNA Damage Repair during Replication Stress.

DNA replication fidelity depends on the integrity of the replication fork to prevent DNA damage and preserve genome stability. Disruptions to this process can trigger replication stress, leading to the accumulation of single-strand DNA (ssDNA) and double-strand breaks (DSBs), which drive mutagenesis and ultimately contribute to disease. While the roles of core histones and their post-translational modifications in this context have been more well-studied, far less is known about how linker histones regulate the replication stress response. Here, we demonstrate that the S-phase-phosphorylated form of the linker histone H1 (pH1) plays a key role in DNA damage repair at collapsed replication forks, both in vitro and in cells. Using phosphomimic and phosphonull H1 mutants, we show that phosphorylation enhances H1 assembly with ssDNA. Utilizing intein chemistry for the site-specific incorporation of a photocrosslinker to the C-terminus of H1, we map the direct interactors of H1. We identify phosphorylated H1 at replication forks, where it engages replication machinery and DNA damage response factors, including Histone PARylation Factor 1 (HPF1). We further demonstrate that ssDNA induces pH1-HPF1 interactions that promote liquid-like assemblies, correlating with reduced DNA damage and histone PARylation. Consistent with this role, reduction of total H1 increases cellular sensitivity to DNA damage, a phenotype that is partially rescued by reintroduction of H1.4. Together, these findings establish pH1 as a new regulator of DNA damage repair at collapsed replication forks through the controlled sequestration of repair factors.

Journal Article↗

Replication protein A-mediated recruitment and activation of Rad17 complexes.

The human Rad17-Rfc2-5 and Rad9-Rad1-Hus1 complexes play crucial roles in the activation of the ATR-mediated DNA damage and DNA replication stress response pathways. In response to DNA damage, Rad9 is recruited to chromatin in a Rad17-dependent manner in human cells. However, the DNA structures recognized by the Rad17-Rfc2-5 complex during the damage response have not been defined. Here, we show that replication protein A (RPA) stimulates the binding of the Rad17-Rfc2-5 complex to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), primed ssDNA, and a gapped DNA structure. Furthermore, RPA facilitates the recruitment of the Rad9-Rad1-Hus1 complex by the Rad17-Rfc2-5 complex to primed and gapped DNA structures in vitro. These findings suggest that RPA-coated ssDNA is an important part of the structures recognized by the Rad17-Rfc2-5 complex. Unlike replication factor C (RFC), which uses the 3' primer/template junction to recruit proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), the Rad17-Rfc2-5 complex can use both the 5' and the 3' primer/template junctions to recruit the Rad9-Rad1-Hus1 complex, and it shows a preference for gapped DNA structures. These results explain how the Rad17-Rfc2-5 complex senses DNA damage and DNA replication stress to initiate checkpoint signaling.

Cell Cycle Proteins↗

Cohesin reshapes replication fork contacts to aid fork slowing and reversal.

DNA replication forks can be challenged by cancer chemotherapeutic treatments, leading to accumulation of single-stranded DNA and slowdown of DNA synthesis. The marked plasticity of replication forks under replication stress ensures fork stability, damage tolerance and complete genome duplication1. Initiation and progression of replication forks occur in a three-dimensionally organized genome. DNA loop extrusion by the cohesin complex organizes the genome2 and regulates the initiation and positioning of DNA replication origins3,4. Although transient interaction of sister forks was recently reported during unperturbed replication5, the functional relevance of fork contacts during replication stress and the role of cohesin in this context remain unknown. Here we show that cohesin-mediated loop extrusion rearranges nascent DNA contacts at stressed replication forks to promote genome stability. Using auxin-inducible degron6, separation-of-function mutants7-9 and a newly developed Micro-C-based technique to capture chromatin contacts at nascent DNA (Repli-C), we found that loop-extruding cohesin accumulates at stalled replication forks, limiting sister-fork coupling in favour of inter-replicon contacts. This process promotes active fork slowing and reversal by preventing PRIMPOL action on single-stranded DNA1. These findings show that the replication stress response is not merely an accumulation of individual regulatory events, but is topologically integrated across the genome through cohesin loop extrusion. While providing a new function for loop-extruding cohesin, our results indicate the potential impact on cancer therapy of frequent cohesin mutations in tumours10.

Journal Article↗

Identification of a novel centrosome/microtubule-associated coiled-coil protein involved in cell-cycle progression and spindle organization.

Here we describe the identification of a novel vertebrate-specific centrosome/spindle pole-associated protein (CSPP) involved in cell-cycle regulation. The protein is predicted to have a tripartite domain structure, where the N- and C-terminal domains are linked through a coiled-coil mid-domain. Experimental analysis of the identified domains revealed that spindle association is dependent on the N-terminal and the coiled-coil mid domain. The expression of CSPP at the mRNA level was detected in all tested cell lines and in testis tissue. Ectopic expression of CSPP in HEK293T cells blocked cell-cycle progression in early G1 phase and in mitosis in a dose-dependent manner. Interestingly, mitosis-arrested cells contained aberrant spindles and showed impairment of chromosome congression. Inhibition of CSPP gene expression by small interfering RNAs induced cell-cycle arrest/delay in S phase. This phenotype was characterized by elevated levels of cyclin A, decreased levels of cyclin E and hyperphosphorylation of the S-phase checkpoint kinase Chk1. The activation of Chk1 may indicate a replication stress response due to an inappropriate G1/S-phase transition. Taken together, we demonstrate that CSPP is associated with centrosomes and microtubules and may play a role in the regulation of G(1)/S-phase progression and spindle assembly.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Mcl1p is a polymerase alpha replication accessory factor important for S-phase DNA damage survival.

Mcl1p is an essential fission yeast chromatin-binding protein that belongs to a family of highly conserved eukaryotic proteins important for sister chromatid cohesion. The essential function is believed to result from its role as a Pol1p (polymerase alpha) accessory protein, a conclusion based primarily on analogy to Ctf4p's interaction with Pol1p. In this study, we show that Mcl1p also binds to Pol1p with high affinity for the N terminus of Pol1p during S phase and DNA damage. Characterization of an inducible allele of mcl1+, (nmt41)mcl1-MH, shows that altered expression levels of Mcl1p lead to sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents and synthetic lethality with the replication checkpoint mutations rad3Delta, rqh1Delta, and hsk1-1312. Further, we find that the overexpression of the S-phase checkpoint kinase, Cds1, or the loss of Hsk1 kinase activity can disrupt Mcl1p's interaction with chromatin and Pol1p during replication arrest with hydroxyurea. We take these data to mean that Mcl1p is a dynamic component of the polymerase alpha complex during replication and is important for the replication stress response in fission yeast.

Alleles↗

Epigenomic stress response. Knockdown of DNA methyltransferase 1 triggers an intra-S-phase arrest of DNA replication and induction of stress response genes.

The DNA methylation pattern is an important component of the epigenome that regulates and maintains gene expression programs. In this paper, we test the hypothesis that vertebrate cells possess mechanisms protecting them from epigenomic stress similar to DNA damage checkpoints. We show that knockdown of DNMT1 (DNA methyltransferase 1) by an antisense oligonucleotide triggers an intra-S-phase arrest of DNA replication that is not observed with control oligonucleotide. The cells are arrested at different positions throughout the S-phase of the cell cycle, suggesting that this response is not specific to distinct classes of origins of replication. The intra-S-phase arrest of DNA replication is proposed to protect the genome from extensive DNA demethylation that could come about by replication in the absence of DNMT1. This protective mechanism is not induced by 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine, a nucleoside analog that inhibits DNA methylation by trapping DNMT1 in the progressing replication fork, but does not reduce de novo synthesis of DNMT1. Our data therefore suggest that the intra-S-phase arrest is triggered by a reduction in DNMT1 and not by demethylation of DNA. DNMT1 knockdown also leads to an induction of a set of genes that are implicated in genotoxic stress response such as NF-kappaB, JunB, ATF-3, and GADD45beta (growth arrest DNA damage 45beta gene). Based on these data, we suggest that this stress response mechanism evolved to guard against buildup of DNA methylation errors and to coordinate inheritance of genomic and epigenomic information.

Cell Division↗

Pleiotropic resistance to DNA-interactive drugs is associated with increased expression of genes involved in DNA replication, repair, and stress response.

A combination of four genetic suppressor elements (GSEs), two of which are derived from putative transcriptional regulators, was previously found to increase resistance to drugs inhibiting DNA replication in HT1080 fibrosarcoma cells. In the present study, two GSE-transduced cell lines, isolated with and without cytotoxic selection, were found to be resistant to a diverse group of DNA-interactive agents, including aphidicolin, hydroxyurea, cytarabine, etoposide, doxorubicin, and mafosfamide. Changes in gene expression associated with GSE-induced drug resistance were analyzed by cDNA array hybridization and reverse transcription-PCR. Twenty genes were found to be up-regulated in both of the resistant cell lines. These include genes involved in DNA replication and repair (e.g., PCNA, XRCC1, B-MYB, and GADD45), transcriptional regulators associated with stress response, and cell cycle checkpoint control (e.g., YB-1, DBPA, and ATF4), and genes for signal transduction proteins (e.g., protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B and regulatory subunits alpha and beta of cAMP-dependent protein kinase). The observed changes in gene expression may play a role in pleiotropic resistance to different classes of DNA-targeting drugs.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Checkpoint proteins control morphogenetic events during DNA replication stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

In response to DNA replication stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the DNA replication checkpoint maintains replication fork stability, prevents precocious chromosome segregation, and causes cells to arrest as large-budded cells. The checkpoint kinases Mec1 and Rad53 act in this checkpoint. Treatment of mec1 or rad53Delta mutants with replication inhibitors results in replication fork collapse and inappropriate partitioning of partially replicated chromosomes, leading to cell death. We describe a previously unappreciated function of various replication stress checkpoint proteins, including Rad53, in the control of cell morphology. Checkpoint mutants have aberrant cell morphology and cell walls, and show defective bud site selection. Rad53 shows genetic interactions with septin ring pathway components, and, along with other checkpoint proteins, controls the timely degradation of Swe1 during replication stress, thereby facilitating proper bud growth. Thus, checkpoint proteins play an important role in coordinating morphogenetic events with DNA replication during replication stress.

Actins↗

Mrc1 is a replication fork component whose phosphorylation in response to DNA replication stress activates Rad53.

When DNA replication is stalled, a signal transduction pathway is activated that promotes the stability of stalled forks and resumption of DNA synthesis. In budding yeast, this pathway includes the kinases Mec1 and Rad53. Here we report that the Mediator protein Mrc1, which is required for normal DNA replication and for activation of Rad53, is present at replication forks. Mrc1 initially binds early-replicating sequences and moves along chromatin with the replication fork. Blocking initiation of DNA replication blocks Mrc1 loading onto origins, providing an explanation for why so many mutants in DNA replication show checkpoint defects. In the presence of replication blocks, we find that Mec1 is recruited to regions of stalled replication, where it encounters and presumably phosphorylates Mrc1. Mutation of the canonical Mec1 phosphorylation sites on Mrc1 prevents Mrc1 phosphorylation and blocks Rad53 activation, but does not alter Mrc1's role in DNA replication. Our results suggest a model whereby in response to DNA replication interference, the Mec1 kinase is recruited to sites of replication blocks and phosphorylates a component of the DNA replication complex, Mrc1, thereby setting up a solid-state Rad53 activation platform to initiate the checkpoint response.

Cell Cycle Proteins↗

The TONSL-MMS22L complex and FANCM form an interdependent complex on chromatin to counter replication stress.

FANCM is branchpoint DNA translocase essential for cellular response to replication stress. Here, we show that replication stress stimulates FANCM and the TONSL-MMS22L heterodimer bound to histones H3-H4 to form an interdependent complex on chromatin. TONSL-MMS22L recruits FANCM and Fanconi anemia (FA) core complex to stalled and collapsed forks, maintains FANCM on replication-stressed chromatin, promotes FANCD2 monoubiquitination, facilitates both repair and replication traverse of DNA interstrand crosslinks (ICLs), and suppresses sister chromatid exchanges, through its interactions with FANCM and H3-H4. Reciprocally, both DNA translocase activity and phosphorylation of FANCM facilitate recruitment of TONSL-MMS22L and RAD51 to perturbed forks. Moreover, TONSL-MMS22L and FANCM function together to promote activation of the FA pathway, ICL repair, homologous recombination and replication traverse. Cancer patients with tumors with wildtype FANCM and low expression of TONSL-MMS22L have a more favorable prognosis than those with high expression. Thus, FANCM-TONSL-MMS22L acts coordinately as a complex on chromatin that resolves replication stress, and this complex may present a therapeutic target for wildtype FANCM-linked cancer.

FANCM↗

Human claspin is required for replication checkpoint control.

Claspin is a newly identified protein that regulates Chk1 activation in Xenopus. In the present study we investigated the role of human Claspin in the DNA damage/replication checkpoint in mammalian cells. We observed that human Claspin is a cell cycle regulated protein that peaks at S/G2 phase. Claspin localizes in the nuclei, but it only associates with Chk1 following replication stress or other types of DNA damage. In addition, Claspin is phosphorylated in response to replication stress, and this phosphorylation appears to be required for its association with Chk1. Moreover, Claspin interacts with the checkpoint proteins ATR and Rad9. Given that both the ATR and Rad9-Rad1-Hus1 complexes are involved in Chk1 activation, it is possible that Claspin works as an adaptor molecule bringing these molecules together. Using small interfering RNA technology, we have shown that down-regulation of Claspin expression inhibits Chk1 activation in response to replication stress. More importantly, down-regulation of Claspin augments the premature chromatin condensation induced by hydroxyurea, inhibits the UV-induced reduction of DNA synthesis, and decreases cell survival. Taken together, these data imply a potentially critical role for Claspin in replication checkpoint control in mammalian cells.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

T lymphocyte stress response. II. Protection of translation and DNA replication against some forms of stress by prior hyperthermic stress.

We have compared the effects of a mild heat shock and febrile temperatures on heat-shock protein (hsp) synthesis and development of stress tolerance in T lymphocytes. Our previous studies demonstrated that febrile temperatures (less than or equal to 41 degrees C) induced the synthesis of hsp110, hsp90, and the constitutive or cognate form of hsp70 (hscp70; a weak induction of the strongly stress-induced hsp70 was also observed. In the studies reported herein, we demonstrate that a mild heat shock (42.5 degrees C) reverses this ratio; that is, hsp70 and not hscp70 is the predominate member of this family synthesized at this temperature. Modest heat shock also enhanced the synthesis of hsp110 and hsp90. In order to assess the relationship between hsp synthesis and the acquisition of thermotolerance, purified T cells were first incubated at 42.5 degrees C (induction temperature) and then subsequently subjected to a severe heat-shock challenge (45 degrees C, 30 min). T cells first incubated at a mild heat-shock temperature were capable of total protein synthesis at a more rapid rate following a severe heat shock than control cells (induction temperature 37 degrees C). This phenomenon, which has been previously termed translational tolerance, did not develop in cells incubated at the febrile temperature (induction temperature 41 degrees C). Protection of translation also extended to immunologically relevant proteins such as interleukin-2 and the interleukin-2 receptor. Because clonal expansion is a critical event during an immune response, the effects of hyperthermic stress on DNA replication (mitogen-induced T cell proliferation) was also evaluated in thermotolerant T cells. DNA synthesis in control cells (induction temperature 37 degrees C) was severely inhibited following heat-shock challenge at 44 degrees C or 45 degrees C; in contrast, T cells preincubated at 42.5 degrees C rapidly recovered their DNA synthetic capacity. T cells preincubated at a febrile temperature were moderately protected against hyperthermic stress. The acquisition of thermotolerance was also associated with enhanced resistance to chemical (ethanol)-induced stress but not to heavy metal toxicity (cadmium) or dexamethasone-induced immunosuppression. These studies suggest that prior hsp synthesis may protect immune function against some forms of stress (e.g., febrile episode) but would be ineffective against others such as elevated glucocorticoid levels which normally occur during an immune response.

Animals↗

Functions of Saccharomyces cerevisiae 14-3-3 proteins in response to DNA damage and to DNA replication stress.

Two members of the 14-3-3 protein family, involved in key biological processes in different eukaryotes, are encoded by the functionally redundant Saccharomyces cerevisiae BMH1 and BMH2 genes. We produced and characterized 12 independent bmh1 mutant alleles, whose presence in the cell as the sole 14-3-3 source causes hypersensitivity to genotoxic agents, indicating that Bmh proteins are required for proper response to DNA damage. In particular, the bmh1-103 and bmh1-266 mutant alleles cause defects in G1/S and G2/M DNA damage checkpoints, whereas only the G2/M checkpoint is altered by the bmh1-169 and bmh1-221 alleles. Impaired checkpoint responses correlate with the inability to maintain phosphorylated forms of Rad53 and/or Chk1, suggesting that Bmh proteins might regulate phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of these checkpoint kinases. Moreover, several bmh1 bmh2Delta mutants are defective in resuming DNA replication after transient deoxynucleotide depletion, and all display synthetic effects when also carrying mutations affecting the polalpha-primase and RPA DNA replication complexes, suggesting a role for Bmh proteins in DNA replication stress response. Finally, the bmh1-169 bmh2Delta and bmh1-170 bmh2Delta mutants show increased rates of spontaneous gross chromosomal rearrangements, indicating that Bmh proteins are required to suppress genome instability.

14-3-3 Proteins↗

The DNA replication and damage checkpoint pathways induce transcription by inhibition of the Crt1 repressor.

We have identified the yeast CRT1 gene as an effector of the DNA damage and replication checkpoint pathway. CRT1 encodes a DNA-binding protein that recruits the general repressors Ssn6 and Tup1 to the promoters of damage-inducible genes. Derepression of the Crt1 regulon suppresses the lethality of mec1 and rad53 null alleles and is essential for cell viability during replicative stress. In response to DNA damage and replication blocks, Crt1 becomes hyperphosphorylated and no longer binds DNA, resulting in transcriptional induction. CRT1 is autoregulated and is itself induced by DNA damage, indicating the existence of a negative feedback pathway that facilitates return to the repressed state after elimination of damage. The inhibition of an autoregulatory repressor in response to DNA damage is a strategy conserved throughout prokaryotic and eukaryotic evolution.

Animals↗

Novel checkpoint response to genotoxic stress mediated by nucleolin-replication protein a complex formation.

Human replication protein A (RPA), the primary single-stranded DNA-binding protein, was previously found to be inhibited after heat shock by complex formation with nucleolin. Here we show that nucleolin-RPA complex formation is stimulated after genotoxic stresses such as treatment with camptothecin or exposure to ionizing radiation. Complex formation in vitro and in vivo requires a 63-residue glycine-arginine-rich (GAR) domain located at the extreme C terminus of nucleolin, with this domain sufficient to inhibit DNA replication in vitro. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer studies demonstrate that the nucleolin-RPA interaction after stress occurs both in the nucleoplasm and in the nucleolus. Expression of the GAR domain or a nucleolin mutant (TM) with a constitutive interaction with RPA is sufficient to inhibit entry into S phase. Increasing cellular RPA levels by overexpression of the RPA2 subunit minimizes the inhibitory effects of nucleolin GAR or TM expression on chromosomal DNA replication. The arrest is independent of p53 activation by ATM or ATR and does not involve heightened expression of p21. Our data reveal a novel cellular mechanism that represses genomic replication in response to genotoxic stress by inhibition of an essential DNA replication factor.

Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins↗