Water exercise versus instruction for self-training following a shoulder fracture.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
We report a unique case of cardiac embolization with the Kirschner wire that has been used for osteosynthesis for 24 months previously. According to the complete analysis of medical records and autopsy report, the wire had migrated from the right humeroscapular joint to the heart. Although migration of a Kirschner wire has been reported in the literature, migration of the wire with a total length of 13.5 cm with no pericardial tamponade, despite myocardial perforation, has not been previously described.
This study compares the investigation of and treatment for osteoporosis in two groups of fracture patients at two orthopaedic centres in the UK. One centre had a formal fracture liaison service (FLS) responsible for screening fracture patients for osteoporosis. The other centre relied upon individual clinicians to initiate investigation or treatment for osteoporosis in patients following fracture. Patients who had been treated in either centre for a proximal humeral or hip fracture during a 6-month period were followed up 6 months later to identify how many had received screening or treatment for osteoporosis. Information was retrieved from a prospectively compiled database or by postal questionnaire. The study revealed that in the centre with an FLS 85% of patients with a proximal humeral fracture and 20% with a hip fracture had been offered a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan. Approximately 50% and 85%, respectively, were receiving treatment for osteoporosis 6 months following their fracture. This compared with DEXA being offered to only 6% and 9.7% of humeral and hip fracture patients, respectively, and 20% (hip) and 27% (proximal humerus) receiving osteoporosis treatment in the other centre. The presence of an FLS resulted in a considerably higher proportion of patients receiving investigation and treatment for osteoporosis following a hip or proximal humeral fracture.
Fracture of the humeral shaft after total or hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder occurs infrequently but has serious consequences. This article reports on five patients with ipsilateral humeral fractures following shoulder hemiarthroplasty who were treated either conservatively or surgically. Fractures in the three patients treated conservatively healed on average by 7 months. The results were satisfactory in one patient and unsatisfactory in two patients. Both of these patients complained of pain and limitation of shoulder motion. Fractures in the two patients treated by open reduction and Mennen plate fixation healed on average by 2 months, resulting in a better outcome for these patients treated surgically.
Shoulder hemiarthroplasty is a well-accepted surgical procedure for the treatment of specific subtypes of proximal humeral fractures, including four-part fractures, three-part fractures associated with severe osteopenia, head-splitting and severe articular impression fractures. Careful patient assessment and meticulous surgical technique are essential to prevent complications. The results are satisfactory in approximately 80% of cases. The results are better in younger patients and in acute versus chronic fractures. There are a significant number of complications that are related to technical details of the procedure. Careful placement of the prosthesis and secure reattachment of the tuberosities to the shaft reduce the chance of complication following surgery. Good to excellent results in terms of range of motion and pain relief can be expected in most patients.
Fracture of the humeral shaft as a complication of total shoulder replacement or shoulder hemiarthroplasty is infrequent, but has serious consequences. Traumatic injury is the most common reason for humeral fracture. The prosthesis causes corticolysis as a result of aseptic and septic loosening. Concomitant with increasing use of total and hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder, is an increase in aseptic loosening of the prosthesis. This increases the frequency of humeral fracture after the procedures. We reviewed the results of 3 patients, women aged 54 and 68 years, respectively, and a man of 65, who were treated for humeral fracture as a complication of hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder. We recommend surgical treatment for fracture around the tip of the prosthesis. Humeral fracture below the tip of the prosthesis should be treated individually, depending on the surgeon's experience.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Fractures about the shoulder in children rarely require operative treatment. Exceptions include open fractures and those associated with neurovascular compromise. Fractures of the proximal humerus in older children that cannot be adequately reduced and maintained should be treated with open reduction and internal fixation. Interposition of periosteum and biceps tendon can lead to difficulty in fracture reduction. Irreducible displaced fractures of the clavicular shaft, fractures that develop nonunion, and congenital pseudarthrosis of the clavicle can be treated by an intramedullary pin technique with bone grafting. Posterior displacement of fractures of the medical clavicle sometimes become an orthopedic emergency. Reduction by closed or open means should be accomplished to relieve compression of mediastinal structures. This injury does not require internal fixation. Types IV, V, and VI distal clavicle injuries require open reduction and reefing of the periosteal tube with occasional need for temporary lag-screw fixation. There is some debate about the type III injury. Large glenoid fractures involving the anterior rim that are associated with instability of the glenohumeral joint are best treated by open reduction and internal fixation.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Nine humeral fractures occurred subsequent to 499 shoulder arthroplasties that had been performed between December 1978 and November 1987 at the Mayo Clinic. The time from the arthroplasty to the fracture averaged thirty-nine months (range, eight to 101 months). Seven patients were women and two were men, and the average age was seventy years (range, forty-five to eighty-five years). The arthroplasties were performed for rheumatoid arthritis in five patients and for the sequelae of trauma in four. Six patients had advanced osteopenia, and two had had an ipsilateral total elbow arthroplasty. Six of the fractures were centered at the tip of the prosthesis; one fracture (type A) extended proximally, and five (type B) did not. The three remaining fractures (type C) involved the humeral shaft distal to the implant and extended into the distal humeral metaphysis. Four fractures healed with non-operative treatment. Two fractures that had unacceptable alignment were treated successfully with operative intervention. Three fractures that were treated with immobilization in a splint failed to heal; two of those fractures eventually united after a revision of the prosthesis and bone-grafting was performed, and one fracture remained ununited. Radial nerve palsy developed postoperatively in two patients, and it resolved within three months. Five patients had poor active motion before the fracture, and two of them had even less motion after the fracture was treated. Our experience suggests that long oblique and spiral fractures can be successfully treated non-operatively, provided that the skeletal alignment is acceptable.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The incidence of periprosthetic fracture during or after shoulder arthroplasty is 1% to 3% of all shoulder arthroplasties. The frequency with which this injury occurs may be increasing, however. Contemporary implants have been designed specifically for uncemented use and often have larger proximal bodies. During insertion, attempts are made to achieve a tight, line-line fit. Consequently the risk for periprosthetic fracture may be higher than estimated.
The posterior luxation of the shoulder joint is a rarely reported and often not recognized lesion in the clinical workday. The authors present the first case of a posterior luxation of the shoulder joint in combination with an contralateral anterior shoulder joint fracture dislocation. In that case the authors stress the importance of an exact clinical and radiology diagnostic and the right way to reduce a posterior luxation of the shoulder joint. Finally they draw the readers attention to operative steps to prevent a reluxation of the shoulder joint.
Fractures can occur during violent muscular violence such as occur in the course of epileptic seizures, though this is rare (0.3%). The proximal part of the humerus is most frequently affected. The typical lesion is bilateral posterior dislocation or fracture-dislocation. We present a rare case of bilateral anterior fracture-dislocation of the shoulder sustained as the result of an epileptic fit. The treatment given was open reduction, refixation of the anterior labrum and screw fixation of the fragments. A review of the literature revealed only 18 cases of bilateral anterior dislocations caused by convulsive seizures.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Currently, there is little information concerning periprosthetic humeral fractures after shoulder arthroplasty. Therefore, we reviewed our experience with these fractures to determine the results of treatment, the risk factors for periprosthetic fracture, and the rates of reoperation. METHODS: Between 1976 and 2001, nineteen postoperative periprosthetic humeral fractures occurred among 3091 patients who had undergone shoulder arthroplasty at our institution. Sixteen patients had a complete series of radiographs and were included in this study. The average time from the arthroplasty to the fracture was forty-nine months. Seven patients had severe osteopenia. Twelve fractures occurred at the tip of the prosthesis; of these, six extended proximally (type-A fractures) and six did not (type-B fractures). Three fractures occurred distal to the implant and extended into the distal humeral metaphysis (type-C fractures). One fracture occurred in the proximal metadiaphyseal region because of osteolysis. RESULTS: Six fractures healed after an average of 180 days of nonoperative treatment. Five fractures were treated operatively after an average of 123 days of unsuccessful nonoperative treatment. The remaining five fractures had immediate operative treatment. All sixteen fractures healed. One patient required multiple operations over a period of three years before union was achieved. With the exclusion of this patient and one other patient who received a custom prosthesis, the average time between the first operative procedure and union was 278 days. CONCLUSIONS: Our data do not clearly indicate the need for operative treatment of type-A fractures unless the humeral component is loose. A trial of nonoperative treatment may be considered for well-aligned type-B fractures that are associated with a well-fixed humeral component; however, operative intervention should be considered for type-B fractures that have not progressed toward union by three months. If the component is well fixed, open reduction and internal fixation may be performed. If the component is loose, revision with a long-stem component is recommended. For type-C fractures, a trial of nonoperative treatment is recommended.
This retrospective study was done to find out the outcome of hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder following comminuted proximal humeral fractures in 20 elderly patients. Their average age was 77.6 years. The average follow-up was 33 months. All patients were reviewed in the outpatient clinic using the Constant Score. The median Constant Score was 47.5. None of the patients had severe pain. Four had moderate and 16 had no or mild pain. Range of movement was not good. The activities of daily living were significantly reduced in patients with moderate shoulder pain. Sixteen patients (80%) were satisfied with the outcome of the management of their shoulder injury. Radiological assessment showed malrotation of the prosthesis and ectopic ossification in one patient each. Osteolysis around the greater tuberosity was noted with three isoelastic prostheses. Seven patients showed proximal migration of the prosthesis although there was no significant difference in functional results. Complications included fatal pulmonary embolism in one patient. Overall, hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder gave good pain relief but there was only moderate functional improvement.