PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “STING”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Box jellyfish (Carybdea alata) in Waikiki. The analgesic effect of sting-aid, Adolph's meat tenderizer and fresh water on their stings: a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

The study measured the analgesic effects of three popular Hawaii remedies for stings from the box jellyfish, Carybdea alata. Analysis of data showed that aerosol sprays of Sting-Aid (an aluminum sulfate solution), Aldolph's meat tenderizer dissolved in water, and fresh water neither increased nor decreased the pain of box jellyfish stings more than the control (seawater).

Acetic Acid↗

The value of immunotherapy with venom in children with allergy to insect stings.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of patients allergic to insect stings with insect-venom injections has been shown to be 97 percent effective in reducing the risk of sting-induced anaphylaxis. However, the frequency of systemic reactions to subsequent stings in unimmunized adults with previous reactions is approximately 60 percent. To determine which factors, in addition to a history of reaction and evidence of venom-specific IgE antibody, predispose patients to future insect-sting reactions, we studied a venom-sensitive group of children who were deemed to be at relatively low risk for severe reactions; 28 percent of them received venom therapy. METHODS: We studied 242 children, 2 through 16 years of age, each of whom had had a systemic allergic reaction, affecting only the skin, to an insect sting. Each child had a positive skin-test reaction to one or more of five hymenopteran venoms. Sixty-eight children received immunotherapy with insect venom and 174 did not; about half were randomly assigned to treatment groups, and the rest were assigned on the basis of the patient's (or the parents') choice. The results of accidental stings during four years of observation were evaluated. RESULTS: In the treated group, 84 stings in 36 patients resulted in one systemic reaction (1.2 percent of stings). In contrast, 196 stings in 86 untreated children resulted in 18 systemic reactions (9.2 percent of stings, P less than 0.001). Sixteen of these 18 reactions were judged to be milder than the patient's reaction to the first sting, 2 were similar in severity, and none were more severe. CONCLUSIONS: These data confirm that immunotherapy with insect venom prevents recurrences of systemic reactions after subsequent insect stings. Because of the surprisingly low rate of reactions among untreated children, we could not identify any characteristics that were predictive of repeat reactions. Since only 9.2 percent of stings in the untreated children led to a systemic reaction and since there was no progression to a more severe reaction, we conclude that venom immunotherapy is unnecessary for most children who are allergic to insect stings.

Adolescent↗

Motor pattern of the stinging response in the honeybee Apis mellifera

In the stinging response of the worker honeybee (Apis mellifera), rhythmic movements of the lancets on the stylet are produced by alternating contractions of a set of stinging muscles (a protractor, M198, and a retractor, M199) on each side during co-contraction of the frucula muscles (M197s) on both sides. In this study, stinging movements were elicited by tactile stimulation to the sternum in isolated abdomens, in intact animals and in preparations in which the connectives between the sixth and terminal abdominal ganglia were cut. There was a close relationship among the following three temporal variables of stinging motoneurone pattern: the interval between successive bursts of a stinging muscle, the duration of a burst and the time lag between the bursts of homologous stinging muscles on both sides. All of these variables increased linearly as the sting was inserted deeper into a soft object and the tension on the lancets increased. When sensory nerves from the proprioceptors (campaniform sensilla on the tapering sting shaft and hair plates at the basal cuticular plate) were cut on both sides, the relative timing of bursts of homologous stinging muscles on both sides and antagonistic stinging muscles on each side became more variable. When a proprioceptive input was removed from one side during penetration of the sting, the frequency of the bursts of stinging muscles was higher and the duration of bursts was shorter on the cut side than on the intact side; nevertheless, a sting muscle was still activated out of phase with its antagonistic muscle on the ipsilateral side and its homologous muscle on the contralateral side. These results suggest that the motor pattern driving the rhythmic movements of stinging muscles is produced by a central pattern generator consisting of a pair of oscillators located in the terminal abdominal ganglion and that the precise timing of the motor pattern in a hemiganglion is controlled mainly by proprioceptive inputs on its own side.

Journal Article↗

Long-term protection after stopping venom immunotherapy: results of re-stings in 200 patients.

BACKGROUND: Venom immunotherapy (VIT) protects most patients allergic to Hymenoptera stings while booster injections are continued. Few data on long-term protection after discontinuation of treatment are available. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate protection from re-stings over a prolonged period after stopping VIT. METHODS: Re-sting data were obtained from 200 of 322 patients in whom VIT had been stopped between 1988 and 1992 after a duration of at least 3 years. The 25 (12.5%) patients who again developed systemic allergic reactions were compared with 50 matched patients without re-sting reactions. Clinical data and diagnostic parameters (i.e., skin sensitivity and specific IgE and IgG) were studied. RESULTS: Of the 25 patients who had re-sting reactions, 19 had been treated with bee venom (relapse rate, 15.8%), and six had been treated with Vespula venom (relapse rate, 7.5%). About half of the re-sting reactions occurred on the first resting after stopping VIT. Most of these reactions were mild, whereas the majority of reactions occurring after repeated re-stings were severe. When re-sting reactions were related to the total re-stings per year, an accumulation of sting reactions was observed in years 3 to 5 after stopping VIT. Patients with re-sting reactions had been receiving VIT for a significantly shorter duration (43.35 months) than those with continued protection (54.65 months) (p < 0.01). Of the diagnostic parameters, only a negative intracutaneous skin test at 10(-3) gm/L predicted long-term protection reliably. CONCLUSION: Venom immunotherapy of 3 to 5 years duration induces long-term protection in most patients. In rare occasions severe re-sting reactions may, however, occur, especially after repeated re-stings.

Adolescent↗

Quantitative trait loci that influence the expression of guarding and stinging behaviors of individual honey bees.

This study was conducted to test for the effect of three stinging behaviors QTLs (sting-1, sting-2 and sting-3) on the expression of guarding and stinging behavior of individual honey bees, and to determine if results of defensive behavior QTLs found in studies with Africanized honey bees could be extended to other populations of bees. Samples of guards, stingers, foragers and nurse bees were taken from two backcross colonies derived from a defensive colony and a gentle colony. The genotype of each bee for both types of colonies was determined for two sequence tagged site (STS) markers linked to sting-1 and for another two STSs, one linked to sting-2 and one linked to sting-3. Results showed that sting-1 had an effect on the expression of both stinging and guarding behaviors, sting-2 and sting-3 influenced the expression of guarding behavior. These results indicate that division of labor is influenced by specific QTLs. Results also show that QTLs mapped in a population of Africanized honey bees using colony level phenotypes also influenced the expression of guarding and stinging behavior of individual bees of other populations.

Aggression↗