PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “SURAMIN”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

The anti-proliferative effect of suramin towards tamoxifen-sensitive and resistant human breast cancer cell lines in relation to expression of receptors for epidermal growth factor and insulin-like growth factor-I: growth stimulation in the presence of tamoxifen.

BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of breast cancer patients receiving tamoxifen therapy relapse during treatment following acquisition of tamoxifen-resistant or oestrogen-independent phenotypes. The mechanism behind this rapid progression to oestrogen autonomy is at present unclear and further treatment modalities are limited. Suramin represents a novel potential second line therapy. The mechanism of the antineoplastic activity of suramin is not completely understood, although the drug binds to many growth factors including epidermal growth factor and insulin-like growth factors and can also dissociate growth factors from their receptors. In this study we have related suramin sensitivity to the expression of receptors for epidermal growth factor and insulin-like growth factor-I in a number of breast cancer cell lines including lines resistant to tamoxifen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The anti-proliferative effects of suramin were investigated in two oestrogen dependent breast cancer lines (ZR-75-1 and MCF-7), oestrogen independent (ZR-PR-LT) and tamoxifen resistant (ZR-75-9a1) variants of ZR-75-1 and a tamoxifen resistant (LY2) variant of MCF-7. Full dose response curves were constructed and IC50 values determined for each cell line. Sensitivity to suramin was correlated with the level of expression of receptors for epidermal growth factor (EGFR) and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGFR). On observing stimulation of cell proliferation by suramin in the tamoxifen resistant cell lines in the presence of tamoxifen we also investigated the possible role of suramin sequestration of transforming growth factor-beta in mediating this effect. RESULTS: All cell lines exhibited a dose- and time-dependent response to suramin treatment. Tamoxifen resistant ZR-75-9a1 cells (day 6 IC50 85 micrograms ml-1) were more resistant to suramin than oestrogen independent ZR-PR-LT cells (day 6 IC50 45 micrograms ml-1), and the parent ZR-75-1 line (day 6 IC50 56 micrograms ml-1). Increased sensitivity to suramin was associated with increased expression of IGFR and decreased expression of EGFR. Tamoxifen resistant LY2 cells were significantly more sensitive to suramin (day 6 IC50 70 micrograms ml-1) than MCF-7 cells (day 6 IC50 350 micrograms ml-1). Both IGFR and EGFR expression by LY2 cells was lower than in the parent line. The antioestrogen-resistant ZR-75-9a1 and LY2 lines grown in the presence of 8 microM tamoxifen were growth stimulated by concentrations of the drug below 100 micrograms/ml. As growth stimulation observed in the presence of tamoxifen may have been due to suramin sequestration of tamoxifen induced TGF-beta 1 secretion we also investigated the response of the cells to this peptide in the presence and absence of suramin. All cell lines were growth inhibited by TGF-beta 1 except ZR-75-9a1 which was unresponsive. Responses to TGF-beta 1 were modified in the presence of 100 micrograms suramin ml-1 although TGF-beta 1 was unable to mimic the ability of tamoxifen to stimulate proliferation in the presence of suramin. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that for ZR-75-1 cells and variants, increased sensitivity to suramin is associated with an increase in expression of IGFR and a decrease in EGFR numbers. However, tamoxifen resistant LY2 cells, in which both IGFR and EGFR expression is reduced were considerably more sensitive than parental MCF-7 cells suggesting that there is no clear relationship between EGFR and IGFR expression and suramin sensitivity. The unexpected stimulation of cell proliferation of the tamoxifen resistant variants by suramin in the presence of tamoxifen could not be explained by suramin sequestration of transforming growth factor-beta and the mechanism of this interaction remains unclear.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Efficacy of suramin against human prostate carcinoma DU145 xenografts in nude mice.

PURPOSE: Toward developing a model to study the mechanism of action of suramin against prostate cancer, we identified the effect of suramin on the growth of xenografts of the androgen-independent human prostate carcinoma DU145 cell line and our subline of suramin-resistant (SR) DU145 cells which are less responsive to suramin in vitro. METHODS: Athymic nude mice bearing DU145 or SR DU145 xenografts were treated intraperitoneally (IP) once weekly with normal saline (vehicle control) or suramin in normal saline. For data analysis mice were grouped as follows: 0 mg/kg (controls), < 210 mg/kg, 210 to 260 mg/kg, or >260 mg/kg suramin. RESULTS: The growth of DU 145 xenografts was slowed by treatment with 210 to 260 mg/kg suramin IP once weekly: differences in tumor volume for the 210 to 260 mg/kg group compared with the control group on days 29 and 57 showed growth inhibited by 43% and 55%, respectively. At the same time, growth of SR DU 145 xenografts generally was not slowed by suramin treatment at any dose, but appeared to be enhanced to some degree by all doses of suramin during the typical slower initial growth phase of xenografts of this cell line: differences in tumor volume compared with control on day 29 showed growth enhanced by 100% to 342%. Mice treated with 210 to 260 mg/kg maintained nadir suramin plasma levels near our clinically relevant target of 1 x 10(-4) M. CONCLUSIONS: Suramin, without concomitant corticosteroid therapy, was effective in slowing the growth of DU145 xenografts in nude mice at clinically relevant plasma suramin levels. The data showing efficacy for DU145 xenografts was supported by the lack of efficacy at the same time for xenografts of cells known to be less responsive to suramin in vitro, i.e. the SR DU145 cells, at similar doses and nadir plasma suramin levels. In discussions on the utility of suramin our data should be considered as support for continuing the study of suramin in the treatment of advanced, androgen-independent prostate cancer.

Animals↗

Suramin-induced decrease in prostate-specific antigen expression with no effect on tumor growth in the LNCaP model of human prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Suramin, a polysulfonated naphthylurea and a recognized antitrypanosomal agent, has shown some promise in phase II clinical trials in the management of hormone-refractory human prostate cancer. Reduction of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels has been proposed as an end point for evaluating the antitumor efficacy of treatments for hormone-refractory prostate cancer. PURPOSE: We examined the antitumor effect of suramin in an in vivo mouse model of hormone-refractory human prostate cancer to determine whether a decrease in PSA levels reflects a reduction in tumor growth (volume). The tumors were induced in castrated, athymic nude mice by use of the androgen-independent, tumorigenic human prostate cancer cell line C4-2, which is a subline of the androgen-dependent, parental nontumorigenic cell line LNCaP. We also evaluated the effects of suramin in vitro on cell growth and the expression of PSA messenger RNA (mRNA) in both LNCaP and C4-2 cells. METHODS: For the in vivo studies, 24 mice were given a subcutaneous injection of 5 x 10(6) C4-2 cells at each of four sites. Animals (n = 20) with tumor volumes greater than 1 mm3 or less than 5 mm3 were divided equally into two groups. Drug treatment was initiated in one group by administration of 1 mg suramin intraperitoneally, followed by 0.1 mg suramin at 10-day intervals to maintain constant serum levels. Tumor growth and PSA expression levels were monitored. For the in vitro studies, both LNCaP and C4-2 cells were exposed to 100-400 microgram/mL suramin, and cell growth was monitored by a quantitative crystal violet assay. PSA mRNA expression was assessed by northern blot analysis in cells treated with either 250 microgram/mL suramin, 400 ng/mL dihydrotestosterone (DHT) (positive control), or 0.5-75 microgram/mL hydrocortisone (to mimic the clinical use of hydrocortisone during suramin treatment to compensate for the loss of adrenocortical function). In some studies, the combined effect of DHT and suramin on PSA mRNA expression was also evaluated. A two-way analysis of variance was performed to evaluate the treatment differences, and P values were obtained from two-sided tests for statistical significance. RESULTS: In vivo, suramin did not significantly affect the growth of androgen-independent C4-2 tumors (relative to the growth of tumors in 5% glucose-treated control animals; P = .76). However, suramin significantly decreased the ratio of PSA level to tumor volume (ng/mL PSA per mm(3) of tumor) (P<.001). Mice developed bone metastases in both treatment arms. Suramin affected the in vitro growth of LNCaP cells but not of C4-2 cells. Suramin diminished PSA mRNA expression in both LNCaP and C4-2 cells grown in vitro. Hydrocortisone had no effect on PSA mRNA levels. CONCLUSIONS: Although suramin inhibited the growth of androgen-dependent LNCaP cells, it did not inhibit the growth of androgen-independent C4-2 cells either in vitro or in vivo. Suramin significantly decreased PSA mRNA expression in both cell lines in vitro and depressed serum PSA levels in mice bearing androgen-independent C4-2 tumors. IMPLICATIONS: PSA level should be used with caution as an end point in clinical trials using suramin therapy for hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Analysis of Variance↗

Differential effects of suramin on P2-purinoceptors mediating contraction of the guinea-pig vas deferens and urinary bladder.

1. The effect of the P2-purinoceptor antagonist, suramin, was investigated on contractions of the guinea-pig vas deferens and urinary bladder induced by adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP) and by the other naturally occurring nucleoside triphosphates. 2. ATP, guanosine 5'-triphosphate (GTP), cytidine 5'-triphosphate (CTP), inosine 5'-triphosphate (ITP) and uridine 5'-triphosphate (UTP) (0.1-500 microM) each contracted both the guinea-pig bladder and the guinea-pig vas deferens. In the vas deferens the order of potency of the nucleotides was ATP >> CTP > GTP > or = UTP = ITP, and in the bladder it was ATP >> CTP = GTP > UTP = ITP, although maximal responses to these agonists were not achieved in either tissue. 3. Suramin (30 microM-1 mM) dose-dependently inhibited ATP-induced contractions of the bladder in an apparently non-competitive manner, causing a reduction in the slope of the concentration-response curve to ATP. In contrast, suramin (5 microM-1 mM) had little inhibitory effect on ATP-induced contractions of the vas deferens, and indeed at concentrations of 100 microM and above markedly potentiated high concentrations of ATP (100-500 microM). The contractions induced by CTP, GTP, UTP and ITP (1-500 microM) were, however, abolished by suramin (1 mM) in each tissue. 4. Desensitization of the P2X purinoceptors in the guinea-pig vas deferens with adenosine 5'-alpha,beta-methylenetriphosphonate (AMPCPP) (300 microM) abolished contractions induced by ATP (1 microM-1 mM) in the absence of suramin. However, the contractions induced in the presence of suramin were unaffected by prior desensitization, indicating that they were not mediated by P2X-purinoceptors.5. ATP (100 MicroM) was dephosphorylated by both isolated tissue preparations under the conditions of these experiments, breakdown products being detectable after 2 min, with the major breakdown product in the bladder being inosine whereas that in the vas deferens was adenosine. Approximately 35% of the ATP remained intact after incubation for 30 min with the bladder, and approximately 45% remained after incubation for 30 min with the vas deferens. In each tissue this degradation was inhibited by suramin (1 mM), so that after incubation of ATP (100 MicroM) in the presence of suramin for 30 min,approximately 50% remained in the case of the bladder and approximately 65% remained in the vas deferens. However, inhibition of the production of the inhibitory agonist, adenosine by suramin did not appear to be responsible for the potentiation observed in the vas deferens, as the PI-purinoceptor antagonist 8-sulphophenyltheophylline (100 MicroM) did not reduce this potentiation.6. Chelation of divalent cations did not appear to account for the enhancement by suramin of ATP-induced contractions of the vas deferens, as the enhancement was still observed when Mg2+ was omitted from the buffer or when its concentration (normally 1.2 mM) was increased ten fold to 12 mM,or when the concentration of Ca2+ (normally 2.5 mM) was reduced to 0.83 mM. Even in the absence of Mg2+ and with the Ca2+ concentration reduced to 0.83 mM, no inhibition by suramin (1 mM) of ATP-induced contractions was observed.7. The most likely explanation for the potentiation by suramin of the ATP-induced contractions of the vas deferens is the co-existence of inhibitory P2Y-purinoceptors. However, no consistent relaxations to ATP (1-100 MicroM) or to the more potent P2Y-purinoceptor agonist 2-methylthioadenosine 5'-triphosphate(2-MeSATP) (0.01-100 MicroM) could be detected in the vas deferens precontracted with KCl (35 mM), even after desensitization of P2x-purinoceptors with AMPCPP (300 MicroM). Similarly, ATP (1-100 MicroM) or 2-MeSATP (0.01-1100 MicroM) added before KCI (35 mM), carbachol (10 JM) or noradrenaline (10 MicroM) did not reduce subsequent contractions to these agents.8. The differential effect of suramin on the contractions induced by ATP in the bladder and the vas deferens was unexpected, and shows that the receptor populations by which ATP acts in these tissues may not be identical. The failure of suramin to inhibit responses to ATP in the vas deferens suggests that this tissue, in addition to possessing P2x-purinoceptors may also possess a suramin-insensitive contractile ATP receptor revealed in the presence of suramin.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗

Insulin secretion and islet lysosomal enzyme activities in the mouse. Effects of suramin.

To study the functional role of the lysosomes in islet physiology, we have in the present study investigated influences on insulin secretion induced by a primary inhibition of islet lysosomal enzyme activities by the use of the lysosomotropic drug suramin. First, we demonstrated that the activities of the three lysosomal enzymes, acid amyloglucosidase, acid alpha-glucosidase, and N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase, were inhibited in mouse islet homogenates upon direct addition of suramin (p less than 0.001). Thereafter, we studied the influences of suramin on islet lysosomal enzyme activities at 24 h after an administration of suramin to mice. We thereby found that the islet lysosomal enzyme activities were not significantly altered compared to controls. However, after incubation of the islets at 3.3 mM glucose, the activities of acid amyloglucosidase and acid alpha-glucosidase were increased (p less than 0.05). The activity of N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase was, however, not affected. Hence, the direct inhibitory action on islet lysosomal enzyme activities by suramin seems to be counteracted in vivo. Concurrently with the increased enzyme activities in incubated islets, glucose-induced insulin secretion was significantly potentiated by suramin pretreatment (p less than 0.01). In contrast, suramin pretreatment did impair the glucose-induced insulin secretion in vivo (p less than 0.01). The direct effects on plasma insulin and glucose levels of acutely administered suramin were also studied. It was found that at a high dose level, suramin slightly reduced the basal plasma insulin levels (p less than 0.05). Suramin did not, however, affect the glucose-induced increase in plasma insulin levels. Conversely, at a low dose level, suramin potentiated glucose-induced increase in plasma insulin levels (p less than 0.01). A similar potentiated glucose-induced insulin secretion by suramin was also observed by a direct addition of the drug to islets in vitro. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that suramin inhibits lysosomal enzyme activities in islet homogenates, increases the activity of acid amyloglucosidase and acid alpha-glucosidase in incubated mouse islets after administration of the drug in vivo and potentiates glucose-stimulated insulin secretion from islets in vitro after administration of the drug in vivo. Thus, we suggest first, that in vivo, compensatory mechanisms may counteract the direct inhibitory influence of suramin on islet lysosomal enzyme activities, and second, that in vitro, islet lysosomal acid amyloglucosidase and acid alpha-glucosidase activities and glucose-induced insulin secretion are regulated in parallel.

Acetylglucosaminidase↗

Suramin administration is associated with a decrease in serum calcium levels.

Suramin has been shown to have an effect on bone resorption in in vitro models. It is not clear if a similar effect is seen in patients treated with suramin. The clinical effect of suramin treatment on total serum calcium was examined in two groups of patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer. In all, 28 patients in group 1 were examined within 2 weeks before and 2 weeks after suramin treatment and 72 patients in group 2 were examined within 2 weeks before, during, and after treatment with suramin. In addition, calcium controls spiked with suramin were run in three different commercially available assays for evaluation of the effect of suramin dose on calcium determination. Group 1 patients showed a decrease in serum calcium after treatment with suramin. The mean uncorrected serum calcium level was 2.29 +/- 0.025 mmol/l before treatment and 2.09 +/- 0.025 mmol/l after treatment (P < 0.0001, paired Wilcoxon test). The mean serum calcium value corrected for albumin was 2.33 +/- 0.02 mmol/l before treatment and 2.24 +/- 0.02 mmol/l after treatment (P = 0.0022, paired Wilcoxon test). Group 2 patients also displayed a decrease in serum calcium after treatment with suramin. The mean baseline value was 2.23 mmol/l (median 2.26 mmol/l, range 1.20-2.54 mmol/l). The mean level of serum calcium corrected for albumin as determined at the end of treatment was 2.14 mmol/l (median 2.16 mmol/l, range 0.98 2.46 mmol/l). In all, 48 patients for whom pre- and post-treatment values were available for analysis displayed a median calcium decrease of 0.09 mmol/l (P = 0.0005, Wilcoxon signed-rank test for the null hypothesis of no change). For 68 patients in group 2, data on serial serum calcium measurements during treatment were available for analysis. A projected median decrease in serum calcium of 0.06 mmol/l (range 0.43 to 0.72 mmol/l) over an 8-week interval of suramin therapy was found. Overall, 47 of the 68 slopes were negative (P = 0.0022, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Nine patients were treated with suramin for less than 6 weeks. These patients' calcium levels were significantly higher than those of 50 patients treated for longer periods (median value 2.24 versus 2.16 mmol/l, P = 0.035, Wilcoxon rank-sum test). No correlation was found between suramin dose and calcium level using the Kodak Ektachem, Hitachi 914, or Synchron Clinical System CX3 method. In conclusion, suramin treatment was consistently associated with decreases in serum calcium in two groups of patients with hormone-refractory cancer. Suramin placed in calcium controls did not affect calcium determination using three commercially available methods.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents↗

Suramin is an active site-directed, reversible, and tight-binding inhibitor of protein-tyrosine phosphatases.

The effect of suramin, a well known antitrypanosomal drug and a novel experimental agent for the treatment of several cancers, on protein-tyrosine phosphatases (PTPases) has been examined. Suramin is a reversible and competitive PTPase inhibitor with Kis values in the low microM range, whereas the Kis for the dual specificity phosphatase VHR is at least 10-fold higher. Although suramin can also inhibit the activity of the potato acid phosphatase at a slightly higher concentration, it is 2-3 orders of magnitude less effective against the protein Ser/Thr phosphatase 1alpha and the bovine intestinal alkaline phosphatase. Suramin binds to the active site of PTPases with a binding stoichiometry of 1:1. Furthermore, when suramin is bound to the active site of PTPases, its fluorescence is enhanced approximately by 10-fold. This property has allowed the determination of the binding affinity of suramin for PTPases and several catalytically impaired mutant PTPases by fluorescence titration techniques. Thus, the active site Cys to Ser mutants bind suramin with similar affinity as the wild type, while the active site Arg to Ala mutant exhibits a 20-fold reduced affinity toward suramin. Interestingly, the general acid deficient Asp to Ala mutant PTPases display an enhanced affinity toward suramin, which is in accord with their use as improved "substrate-trapping" agents. That suramin is a high affinity PTPase inhibitor is consistent with the observation that suramin treatment of cancer cell lines leads to an increase in tyrosine phosphorylation of several cellular proteins. Given the pleiotropic effects of suramin on many enzyme systems and growth factor-receptor interactions, the exact in vivo actions of suramin require further detailed structure-activity investigation of suramin and its structural analogs.

Binding Sites↗

Suramin: development of a population pharmacokinetic model and its use with intermittent short infusions to control plasma drug concentration in patients with prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to (1) develop a population pharmacokinetic model for suramin; (2) use Bayesian methods to assess suramin pharmacokinetics in individual patients; (3) use individual patients' pharmacokinetic parameter estimates to individualize suramin dose and schedule and maintain plasma suramin concentrations within predetermined target ranges; and (4) assess the feasibility of outpatient administration of suramin by intermittent, short infusions. METHODS: Plasma suramin concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and compartmental pharmacokinetic models were fit using a Bayesian algorithm. Population pharmacokinetic models were developed using an iterative two-stage approach. Estimates of each patient's central-compartment volume were used to calculate suramin dosage. Simulation of that patient's suramin clearance was used to predict the time of his next dose. Using this approach, plasma suramin concentration was maintained at between 200 and 300, 175 and 275, 150 and 250, or 100 and 200 microgram/mL in four sequential patient cohorts. The ability of two- and three-compartment, open, linear models to fit the pharmacokinetic data was compared. Population pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated, using both two- and three-compartment structural models in 69 hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients. RESULTS: Target plasma suramin concentrations in individual patients were rapidly achieved. Concentrations were maintained within desired ranges for > or = 85% of treatment duration in all cohorts. A three-compartment, open, linear model described suramin pharmacokinetics better than did a two-compartment, open, linear model. Population pharmacokinetic estimates generated for two- and three-compartment pharmacokinetic models demonstrated modest interpatient pharmacokinetic variability and the long terminal half-life of suramin. CONCLUSION: Suramin can be administered by intermittent short infusion. Adaptive-control-with-feedback dosing facilitated precise control of plasma suramin concentrations and allowed a number of different concentration ranges to be studied. This approach is expensive and labor-intensive. Although we have demonstrated the ability to control drug exposure, simpler dosing schedules require critical evaluation. Population pharmacokinetic parameters generated in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer will facilitate rational design of such schedules.

Adult↗

Suramin suppresses hypercalcemia and osteoclastic bone resorption in nude mice bearing a human squamous cancer.

Suramin is a polyanionic agent which has been found to be an effective antineoplastic agent against various human tumors including adrenal, renal and prostatic cancer, and osteosarcoma. Recently, suramin has been shown to inhibit bone resorption in organ cultures of mouse calvarial bones. In the present study, we examined the effects of suramin on increased osteoclastic bone resorption and hypercalcemia in nude mice bearing a human oral squamous carcinoma. Suramin (1 mg/mouse/injection) was administered i.p. three times a week for the first 2 weeks and then once weekly for the next 6 weeks. Blood ionized calcium levels in the suramin-treated cancer-bearing group were significantly lower than those in the untreated cancer-bearing group. Histological and histomorphometrical examination of bones of these animals showed a significant decrease in osteoclast numbers in the suramin-treated cancer-bearing animals. Suramin at a dose of 0.1 mg/mouse/injection was ineffective and 2 mg/mouse/injection was toxic, confirming its narrow effective dose. Suramin showed no effects on the growth of this squamous cancer. However, suramin markedly inhibited in vivo growth of a rat prostatic adenocarcinoma. In mouse marrow cultures, suramin decreased osteoclast-like cell formation in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, suramin also inhibited bone resorption in organ cultures of fetal rat long bones and resorption pit formation by isolated mature rat osteoclasts. These results show that suramin is an effective inhibitor of osteoclastic bone resorption in vitro and in vivo and suggest that suramin may be a useful agent in prevention and treatment of cancer-induced hypercalcemia. However, our results also suggest that for this indication suramin has a confined range of effective dose.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Mechanisms of growth stimulation by suramin in non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines.

PURPOSE: Suramin, a polysulfonated naphthylurea, has been shown to be effective in the treatment of several cancers. We have reported that suramin, at dose concentrations higher than 140 microM, exerts growth-stimulatory effects in several non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines. The purpose of this study was to examine the mechanisms by which suramin exerts this growth-stimulatory effect in NSCLC cells. METHODS: NCI-H596 cells were treated with agarose-immobilized suramin, directly or by addition on cell culture inserts, after which growth was determined by [3H]thymidine incorporation. PPADS, a specific purinergic receptor antagonist, was used to determine whether suramin acts via purinergic receptors. The effect of suramin on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) was determined by analyzing receptor phosphorylation and dimerization. XAMR 0721, a suramin analogue containing only one of the two polysulfonated arms, was also analyzed for its effects on growth and EGFR activation. RESULTS: Agarose-immobilized suramin stimulated NCI-H596 cell growth, but only when added directly to the cells. When the suramin-conjugated beads were added to the cells on cell culture inserts, which preclude an interaction with the cell surface but allow interaction with the culture medium, there was no effect on proliferation. PPADS had no effect on the growth stimulation by suramin; however suramin treatment resulted in rapid phosphorylation and dimerization of EGFR. Treatment with XAMR 0721 did not affect growth or tyrosine phosphorylation and dimerization of EGFR. CONCLUSIONS: Suramin need not enter NCI-H596 cells to exert its growth-stimulatory effect, nor is this effect mediated by an interaction with soluble growth factors. Rather, it appears that suramin acts via an interaction with EGFR, but not with purinergic receptors.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Suramin in adrenocortical cancer: limited efficacy and serious toxicity.

OBJECTIVE: No satisfactory treatment for adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is available. We investigated the efficacy and toxicity of suramin in the treatment of metastatic ACC since suramin has been recently reported to be active as a single agent therapy for patients with ACC and prostatic carcinoma. DESIGN: We collected data on 9 patients with metastatic ACC treated with suramin in four centres in Germany between 1987 and 1992. PATIENTS: Nine patients (5 women, 4 men; age range 32-67 years) were included. Biochemical evidence of steroid excess was found in 6/9, in three leading to clinical symptoms (hypertension, hyperglycaemia, hirsutism, gynaecomastia). MEASUREMENTS: Tumour responses were assessed by radiological and biochemical evaluation. Other investigations included regular measurements of blood cell counts, coagulation, hepatic and renal function parameters, and serum suramin concentrations. RESULTS: The patients received cumulative doses ranging from 8.2 to 30.2 g suramin over periods of 1-15 months. 3/9 achieved a partial response, 2/9 disease stabilization and 4/9 experienced progressive disease. Tumour responses were transient. Suramin treatment was without direct influence on steroid excess. Serious side-effects included coagulopathy (6/9), thrombocytopenia (6/9), polyneuropathy (2/9) and allergic skin reactions (4/9); the death of two patients was possibly related to suramin therapy. Both toxicity and tumour response were strongly associated with serum level or cumulative dose of suramin. CONCLUSIONS: (1) Suramin is of antineoplastic efficacy in the treatment of metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma. (2) The clinical use of suramin is limited by a narrow therapeutic window with the risk of serious and possibly lethal toxicity at one extreme, and loss of efficacy at the other. Strict monitoring of suramin serum levels is mandatory aiming at levels between 200 and 250 mg/l. Suramin should not be considered as first-line treatment for metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma. (3) To improve treatment options in adrenocortical carcinoma as well as for further investigation on the usefulness of suramin, controlled prospective trials are urgently needed.

Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms↗

Effects of suramin on contractions of the guinea-pig vas deferens induced by analogues of adenosine 5'-triphosphate.

1. Adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP) and some of its analogues contract the guinea-pig vas deferens, acting via receptors which have been classified as P2X-purinoceptors. We have recently shown, however, that the effects of ATP are enhanced, rather than inhibited, by the non-selective P2 antagonist, suramin, and that this enhancement could not easily be explained in terms of inhibition by suramin of the breakdown of ATP. We therefore investigated the effects of suramin on contractions induced by ATP analogues, to define the structure-activity relationships of the suramin-resistant response. 2. In the absence of suramin, the order of potency for ATP analogues was adenosine 5'-(alpha,beta-methylene)triphosphonate (AMPCPP) = P1,P5-diadenosine pentaphosphate (Ap5A) = adenosine 5'-tetraphosphate (Ap4) > adenosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (ATP gamma S) = adenylyl 5'-(beta,gamma-methylene) diphosphonate (AMPPCP) > P1,P5-diadenosine tetraphosphate (Ap4A) > adenosine 5'-O-(2- thiodiphosphate) (ADP beta S) > 2-methylthioadenosine 5'-triphosphate (MeSATP) > or = ATP > adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP). This is generally in agreement with previously reported structure-activity relationships in this tissue. 3. In the presence of suramin (1 mM), responses to Ap5A, Ap4A, AMPPCP, ADP beta S and ADP were abolished or greatly reduced, and contractions induced by AMPCPP, Ap4 and ATP gamma S were inhibited. Contractions induced by MeSATP however, like those induced by ATP itself, were not reduced, but at concentrations above 100 microM were enhanced. In the presence of suramin (1 mM) the order of potency of analogues was therefore AMPCPP = Ap4> ATP = MeSATP> ATP gamma S, with all other analogues tested being essentially inactive at concentrations up to 500 microM.4. Contractile responses of the vas deferens to transmural nerve stimulation (1-50 Hz) in the presence of the alpha-adrenoceptor antagonist, phentolamine (10 microM), were abolished by suramin (1 mM). This is in agreement with previous reports that suramin inhibits the excitatory junction potential, a response thought to be mediated by P2 purinoceptors. It is however hard to reconcile the evidence implicating ATP as the non-adrenergic transmitter responsible for this response with the failure of suramin to inhibit the contractions induced by ATP itself while abolishing nerve-mediated contractions.5. In conclusion, these results confirm our previous findings of a suramin-resistant component to the ATP-induced contraction in the guinea-pig vas deferens, and show that the structure-activity relationships of this response are not identical to those of any known P2-purinoceptor subclass. Although the inhibition by suramin of the breakdown of ATP may contribute to the suramin-resistance of some of the ATP analogues, it does not appear to provide the full explanation.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗

Suramin inhibits bone resorption and reduces osteoblast number in a neonatal mouse calvarial bone resorption assay.

The antineoplastic properties of suramin, a polyanionic agent with demonstrated antigrowth factor activity, are under evaluation in vitro, in vivo, and in clinical trials. Suramin has been shown to have antitumor activity in patients with advanced, hormone refractory prostate cancer. During these trials, significant resolution of osseous pain was observed in nearly three quarters of the patients treated with suramin. To evaluate the effect of suramin on bone cells, we studied the effect of suramin on bone resorption in a neonatal mouse calvarial assay. Suramin inhibited bone-resorbing activity in a dose-related fashion and had an additive effect with calcitonin. Calvaria pretreated with suramin had less bone-resorbing activity, fewer attached osteoblasts, and less medium alkaline phosphatase activity than control calvaria. Suramin also inhibited osteoclastic release of tritiated proline from labeled bone in a dose-dependent fashion. The effect of metastatic prostate carcinoma on bone is incompletely understood, but may be moderated by tumor-produced factors and/or cytokines. The effects of several such agents, therefore, were examined in combination with suramin. Bone resorption induced by PTH, epidermal growth factor, tumor necrosis factor, and a tumor-produced factor, PTH related-protein, was blocked by suramin. The ability of suramin to inhibit the bone-resorbing effects of several cytokines suggests that its mechanism may involve direct action on bone metabolism. Autoradiography performed on calvaria treated with labeled suramin demonstrated heavy deposition of suramin on the outer surface of the matrix, adjacent to osteoblasts and osteoclasts lining the outer table, suggesting that bone cells may be subject to high local concentrations of the drug, in keeping with this hypothesis.

Alkaline Phosphatase↗

Suramin inhibits binding of the V3 region of HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein gp120 to galactosylceramide, the receptor for HIV-1 gp120 on human colon epithelial cells.

The infection of human colonic epithelial cells HT-29 by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) occurs independently of CD4, the main HIV-1 receptor expressed on lymphocytes and macrophages. Recent studies from our group have shown that HT-29 cells express the glycosphingolipid galactosylceramide (GalCer), a potential alternative receptor for the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein gp120. The binding of recombinant gp120 to GalCer was blocked by monoclonal antibodies directed against the third variable region (V3) of gp120, suggesting that the V3 domain was implicated in GalCer recognition. In the present report, we show that suramin, a polysulfonyl naphtylurea known to inhibit retroviral reverse transcriptases in vitro, blocks HIV-1 infection in HT-29 cells. The effect is dose dependent, with a half-maximal inhibition (IC50) achieved for a suramin concentration of 54 micrograms/ml. Since [3H]suramin was not significantly internalized into HT-29 cells during our infection assay (i.e. 2 h), we have considered the possibility that the drug could act at an extracellular step of the HIV-1 cycle. Using a high performance thin layer chromatography binding assay, we show that suramin inhibits binding of HIV-1 gp120 to purified GalCer with an IC50 of 25 micrograms/ml. Suramin does not bind to GalCer, since preincubation of GalCer with suramin did not prevent the subsequent attachment of gp120. Using a solid-phase assay, we show that [3H]suramin specifically binds to recombinant gp120 and that this binding could be blocked by a monoclonal antibody specific for the conserved GPGRAF motif of the V3 domain of gp120. We also demonstrate that [3H]suramin binds to multibranched synthetic GPGRAF peptides that block HIV-1 infection in HT-29 cells. Binding of [3H]suramin to V3 peptides is specific and inhibited by unlabeled suramin (IC50 of 28 micrograms/ml). In contrast, the suramin derivative NF036, that is unable to block HIV-1 infection in HT-29 cells, does not inhibit the binding of [3H]suramin to V3 peptides. Taken together, these results suggest that suramin blocks HIV-1 infection in HT-29 cells because it binds to the V3 domain of gp120 and hence prevents the interaction between gp120 and the GalCer receptor.

Amino Acid Sequence↗