PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “SURGERY, ORAL”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1978

Speech considerations in oral surgery. Part II. Speech characteristics of patients following surgery for oral malignancies.

The characteristics of speech following ablative surgery for oral malignancies are presented. The speech following cheilotomy, maxillectomy, mandibulectomy, nasopharyngeal excavation, and glossectomy is described. Emphasis is placed on glossectomy because of the prevalence of this surgery and the nature of the research being done in this area. Finally, a discussion of research needs involving the oral surgeon, dentist, and speech pathologist is presented.

Articulation Disorders↗
PubMed1997

Use of tranexamic acid mouthwash to prevent postoperative bleeding in oral surgery patients on oral anticoagulant medication.

The clinical hemostatic effect of tranexamic acid mouthwash after oral surgery was evaluated in 47 patients receiving oral anticoagulant therapy. Surgery was performed after the anticoagulant medication was reduced in 15 patients (control group) and with no change in anticoagulant therapy in 32 patients (test group). The only statistical difference between the two treatment groups at baseline was the level of anticoagulation, which was significantly higher in the test group. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups in the incidence of bleeding after oral surgery. The results indicated that a combination of local antifibrinolytic therapy and a local hemostatic agent is effective in preventing postoperative bleeding after oral surgery in patients treated with anticoagulants.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Oral surgery in patients undergoing oral anticoagulant therapy.

UNLABELLED: There is an evident need for procedural protocol for oral surgery patients who undergo oral anticoagulant treatment (OAT) because of: 1) the possible severity of complications and 2) the growing demand for OAT, which in some cases may be as much as 8% of the oral surgery patients that are referred to the hospital from primary care centers. In this study, the authors define the parameters for creating a proto- col applicable to this group of patients. The conclusion is that it is not necessary to suspend OAT before surgery; rather, these procedures should be performed under multidisciplinary medical control. OBJECTIVE: The authors demonstrate that it is possible to perform oral surgery on OAT patients, without having to sus- pend treatment beforehand. STUDY DESIGN: A longitudinal study was performed in OAT patients that required some type of oral surgical procedures. After an INR control, the patient underwent surgery and afterwards the patient was given tranexamic acid as a mouth rinse. Postoperative hemorrhage was classified as slight when it lasted less than 5 minutes, moderate when it lasted longer than five minutes, and severe when it required blood transfusion. RESULTS: The study was performed over a 5-year period (1996-2000), by the maxillofacial surgery department. In that time period, 125 patients with OAT were treated; 90 of them were males and 35 were females. Tooth extraction was per- formed in 229 sessions and a total of 367 teeth were extracted, with an average of 1.6% per session. With regards to postoperative hemorrahage, it was slight in 210 cases (91.7%), moderate in 18 (7.9%) and severe only in one case (0.4%). All the variables were compared and no statistically significant differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that OAT should not be suspended before oral surgery, but it surgery should be performed under multidisciplinary control-especially in the case of the elderly (over 65) or with those patients that have other concomitant illnesses such as renal insufficiency or anemia or other medical treatments.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2001

Comparison of clinical outcome of periapical surgery in endodontic and oral surgery units of a teaching dental hospital: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this retrospective study were (1) to compare the outcome of periapical surgery performed in endodontic and in oral surgery units of a teaching dental hospital and (2) to evaluate the influence of factors affecting outcome. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 176 teeth (endodontic unit, 83; oral surgery unit, 93) surgically treated more than 4 years previously were examined clinically and radiographically by means of strict criteria. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used. RESULTS: The rate of complete healing for patients treated in the endodontic unit (37.4%) was significantly (P = .009) higher than that for patients treated in the oral surgery unit (19.4%). The technical quality of surgery (P < .001), placement of root-end filling (P = .039), absence of a preoperative periapical lesion (P = .042), absence of a post (P = .047), and presence of an adequate coronal restoration (P = .056, odds ratio = 3.71) had significant effects on treatment outcome. CONCLUSION: The technical quality of periapical surgery, the presence of a periapical lesion, and adequate apical and coronal seal are important prognostic determinants of successful periapical surgery.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Oral surgery at St. Mary's Hospital, Chapelizod. A quarter century experience of day-case oral surgery.

To mark the first quarter century of the existence of the Oral Surgery unit at St. Mary's Hospital, Chapelizod, an audit was undertaken. Twenty-nine thousand, three hundred and seventy-four (29,374) entries in the operations register were analysed, examining annual totals, categories of operation, the changing patterns of anaesthesia, including cancellations on the day, and the evolution of a true day-case service. The results showed a decline in total numbers and in some operation categories. The most striking reductions were in extractions of carious teeth and in preprosthetic surgery. The most marked increase was in surgery for impacted teeth. While general anaesthesia remains the most commonly used form of anaesthesia, there has been an increased utilisation of sedation. Since the earlier years the number of patients requiring admission post-operatively has steadily decreased but more patients have been cancelled on the day of operation. Most of the changes described reflect the influence of health care economics and the effects of fluoridation.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Comparison of etodolac, aspirin and placebo for pain after oral surgery.

Single oral doses of etodolac 50, 100 and 200 mg were compared with aspirin 650 mg and placebo in a double-blind, parallel group study of 189 outpatients reporting moderate or severe pain after oral surgery. Overall efficacy of test drugs was evaluated by sum of pain intensity difference (SPID) scores and total pain relief (TOTPAR) scores over 0.5-3, 0.5-6, 0.5-8 and 0.5-12 hours. Etodolac 200 mg provided significantly greater analgesia than aspirin by these measurements over all SPID and all but one TOTPAR interval, and was significantly more effective than placebo over all intervals. Etodolac 100 mg was superior to aspirin for SPID 0.5-8 and 0.5-12 hours, and superior to placebo for both SPID and TOTPAR over all time intervals. Onset of analgesia for etodolac 100 mg, 200 mg and aspirin was 1 hour or less for the majority of patients in each group; 42% receiving etodolac 200 mg reported onset of analgesia within 0.5 hour. Duration of analgesia for etodolac 200 mg appeared twice that of aspirin. A significant positive dose-response relationship was obtained for the three doses of etodolac. A low frequency of side effects was observed in all treatment groups.

Acetates↗