PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Sirolimus”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Vascular effects of sirolimus-eluting versus bare-metal stents in diabetic patients: three-dimensional ultrasound results of the Diabetes and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent (DIABETES) Trial.

OBJECTIVES: A predefined intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) substudy was performed to evaluate the vascular effects of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) versus bare-metal stent (BMS). BACKGROUND: The Diabetes and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent (DIABETES) trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial aimed at demonstrating the efficacy of the SES compared with BMS in diabetic patients. METHODS: Serial intravascular ultrasound analyses were performed in 140 lesions (SES = 75; BMS = 65) immediately after stent implantation and at nine-month follow-up. Vessel, luminal, and stent mean areas and volumes were evaluated at both edges and within the stented segment. Qualitative assessment of residual dissections and stent apposition were also performed. RESULTS: Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar between groups. At 9 months, in-stent neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) mean area and volume were significantly reduced in the SES group (median NIH area 0.01 mm2 [0.0 to 0.1] vs. 2.0 mm2 [1.0 to 2.9] and median NIH volume 0.11 mm3 [0 to 2.1] vs. 35.3 mm3 [16.6 to 62.6]; both p < 0.0001). In the SES group, stent edges evidenced significant increase in lumen dimensions mainly due to significant increase in vessel volume, whereas those of the BMS group presented vessel shrinkage leading to significant lumen reduction. Late acquired incomplete stent apposition was observed in 11 lesions (14.7%) in the SES group and 0 in the BMS group (p = 0.001). At one year, no stent thromboses occurred in malapposed stents. CONCLUSIONS: The SES implantation effectively inhibits NIH in diabetic patients. The antirestenotic effect of SES is also appreciated at the stent edges. Late acquired stent malapposition is a frequent phenomenon in diabetic patients treated with SES.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

A retrospective review of liver transplant patients treated with sirolimus from a single center: an analysis of sirolimus-related complications.

BACKGROUND: Sirolimus (SRL) is a powerful immunosuppressant used primarily in calcineurin inhibitors (CNI)-related nephrotoxicity. However, reports of drug-related side effects are increasing. The aim of our report is to review the frequency and timing of these complications within our transplant patient population. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of liver-transplanted patients treated with sirolimus between November 1998 and April 2002. The data collected included SRL serum levels, frequency of reported and documented SRL-related side effects, and survival outcomes. Statistical evaluation included Pearson chi-square and the Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: Overall, 205 patients were identified, with 30 patients removed from the analysis for different reasons. Of the remaining 175 patients, 91 (52%) patients developed a complication other than an increase in serum triglycerides and/or cholesterol. The most frequent complications were: bilateral lower extremity edema (57.1%), dermatitis (25.3%), oral ulcers (24.2%), joint pain (23.0%), pleural effusion (16.5%) and increase in abdominal girth (9.9%). Other complications included: generalized edema (5.5%), pericardial effusion (5.5%), facial edema (2.2%), and upper extremity edema (1.3%). In addition, we reported two cases of hepatic artery thrombosis, one case of wound dehiscence with evisceration that required surgical repair, and one case of skin cancer. Interestingly, we found that a previous history of myocardial ischemia correlates with the development of SRL side effects. CONCLUSIONS: SRL is a powerful immunosuppressant but not devoid of side effects. These results have elevated our level of suspicion when instituting SRL and may help with early recognition and prevention of drug related complications.

Edema↗
PubMed2005

Consequences of genetic polymorphisms for sirolimus requirements after renal transplant in patients on primary sirolimus therapy.

Sirolimus (SRL) is a substrate for cytochromes P-450 3A and P-glycoprotein, the product of the MDR1 gene. We postulated that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of these genes could be associated with inter-individual variations in SRL requirements. We then evaluated in 149 renal transplant recipients the effect of polymorphisms CYP3A4*1/*1B, CYP3A5*1/*3 and MDR1 SNPs in exon 12, 21 and 26 on SRL concentration/dose (C/D) ratio 3 months after sirolimus introduction. SRL C/D ratio was significantly higher in patients treated with calcineurin inhibitors. The CYP3A4*1B and CYP3A5*1 alleles were present in 17% and 21% of patients, respectively. When treated with a SRL-based therapy and low-dose steroids, patients carrying the CYP3A4*1B or the CYP3A5*1 alleles required significantly more SRL to achieve adequate blood trough concentrations (p < 0.01 and p < 0.02, respectively). None of the MDR1 SNPs was associated with the SRL concentration/dose ratio. These findings suggest that the variations in SRL requirements are secondary to both genetic and non-genetic factors including pharmacokinetic interactions. In patients with SRL-based therapy, genotyping of the CYP3As genes may help to optimize the SRL management in transplant recipients.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗
PubMed2005

Comparison of sirolimus with low-dose tacrolimus versus sirolimus-based calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen in live donor renal transplantation.

UNLABELLED: Between May 2001 and January 2003, 132 live donor renal allotransplant recipients were included in a prospective, randomized controlled trial where they were divided into two groups. All patients received steroids and basiliximab induction therapy. For maintenance immunosuppression, tacrolimus and sirolimus were used in group A. In group B, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and sirolimus were utilized. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 24 months. One-year patient and graft survival rates were not significantly different between group A (96.9%, 92.3%) and group B (100%, 98.4%), respectively. However, the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was less in group B but the difference was not statistically significant (13.5% vs. 18.5% in group A). Statistically significant better renal function was encountered among group B patients at two years post-transplantation as measured by serum creatinine (1.25 vs. 1.43 mg/dl; P = 0.017) and calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (94.9 vs. 79.6 ml/min; P = 0.005). One year protocol biopsies showed insignificant differences relative to chronic allograft damage index (CADI) between either group (Group A: 2.41 vs. Group B: 2.69; P = 0.436). CONCLUSION: Similar outcome was noted among patients in whom calcineurin inhibitors were not included in their immunosuppressive regimen. The long term impact of this observation on graft survival and function needs longer follow up.

Adult↗
PubMed2007

The pharmacodynamic effects of sirolimus and sirolimus-calcineurin inhibitor combinations on macrophage scavenger and nuclear hormone receptors.

BACKGROUND: Sirolimus (SIR) alone or in combination with cyclosporine (CsA) or tacrolimus (TAC) are used in solid organ transplantation, but uncertainty remains regarding their respective atherogenic potentials. METHODS: THP-1 cells were cultured as macrophages and then treated with plasma trough and peak concentration doses of SIR, SIR/CsA or SIR/TAC to assess the time- and dose-dependent mRNA or protein expression of selected atherogenic genes. The selected atherogenic genes included: the macrophage scavenger receptors (MSRs) CD36, CD68, scavenger receptor (SR)-A, SR-BII, and LOX-1; the nuclear hormone receptors peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) and liver-X-receptor alpha (LXRalpha); and the cholesterol efflux transporter (ABCA-1). RESULTS: SIR-mediated changes in mRNA included the upregulation of ABCA1, downregulation of CD68, SR-A and SR-BII, and concentration- and/or time-dependent effects on CD36, LOX-1, PPARgamma, and LXRalpha that did not translate into significant protein changes. With SIR/CsA, the protein expressions of PPARgamma and ABCA-1 were downregulated at 8 h. In contrast, with SIR/TAC, PPARgamma, and ABCA-1 protein expressions were upregulated at 8 h. CONCLUSIONS: Combination results differed from findings with SIR alone, supporting the observed clinical phenotype with calcineurin inhibitors. These findings may provide a rationale for the development of novel drug delivery strategies to mitigate adverse pharmacodynamic responses.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter 1↗
PubMed2004

Sirolimus dosage during and after conversion from calcineurin inhibitor therapy to sirolimus in chronic kidney transplant patients.

UNLABELLED: Sirolimus (SRL) is an alternative to calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) in kidney transplant patients with chronic allograft dysfunction. METHODS: 33 patients were converted to SRL receiving a single loading dose of 15 mg and initial maintenance dose of 5 mg/day. CNI was reduced by 50% on day 1 and tapered during 4-6 weeks after achieving SRL target (8-12 ng/ml). Concomitant immunosuppressive therapy remained unchanged. RESULTS: Patient survival was 100% and graft survival was 85% after 1 year. Mean SRL dose decreased from 5 mg/day initially to 2.8 +/- 1.3 mg/day. SRL dose-adjusted trough concentration did not change significantly over time. Dose-adjusted trough concentrations of CNI before conversion and of SRL after 1 year did not correlate. We observed no severe infections, however, one rejection Banff Ia occurred 7 months after conversion associated with subtherapeutic SRL trough concentration. Adverse events were anemia, dyslipidemia, epistaxis, stomatitis, and bronchiolitis obliterans which occurred mainly during the conversion phase. CONCLUSION: Overlapping conversion from CNI to SRL in chronic kidney transplant patients is possible and safe. However, further studies are necessary with shorter overlap and lower SRL loading and initial maintenance dose which might lead to a decrease in the high number of adverse events in the overlap phase.

Calcineurin Inhibitors↗
PubMed2004

Cost-effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of complex coronary stenoses: results from the Sirolimus-Eluting Balloon Expandable Stent in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (SIRIUS) trial.

BACKGROUND: Recently, sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) have been shown to dramatically reduce the risk of angiographic and clinical restenosis compared with bare metal stent (BMS) implantation. However, the overall cost-effectiveness of this strategy is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between February and August 2001, 1058 patients with complex coronary stenoses were enrolled in the SIRIUS trial and randomized to percutaneous coronary revascularization with either a SES or BMS. Clinical outcomes, resource use, and costs were assessed prospectively for all patients over a 1-year follow-up period. Initial hospital costs were increased by 2881 dollars per patient with SESs. Over the 1-year follow-up period, use of SESs led to substantial reductions in the need for repeat revascularization, including repeat percutaneous coronary intervention and bypass surgery. Although follow-up costs were reduced by 2571 dollars per patient with SESs, aggregate 1-year costs remained 309 dollars per patient higher. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for SES was 1650 dollars per repeat revascularization event avoided or 27,540 dollars per quality-adjusted year of life gained, values that compare reasonably with other accepted medical interventions. Under updated treatment assumptions regarding available stent lengths and duration of antiplatelet therapy, use of SESs was projected to reduce total 1-year costs compared with BMSs. CONCLUSIONS: Although use of SESs was not cost-saving compared with BMS implantation, for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention of complex coronary stenoses, their use appears to be reasonably cost-effective within the context of the US healthcare system.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed2006

Evaluation of a microparticle enzyme immunoassay for the measurement of sirolimus in whole blood (Abbott IMx sirolimus).

An immunoassay of sirolimus based on the microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA) principle was evaluated on 105 whole blood samples (EDTA) drawn from a population of renal (n = 38) and hepatic or heart (n = 3) transplant patients. Each blood sample was analyzed simultaneously by MEIA and by a liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) method. The statistical analysis according to Passing-Bablok (x= LCMS, y= mean of two measurements of the same samples on IMx) produced the following results: Spearman r value = 0.9651, y(MEIA) = 0.99x (LCMS) - 0.26 microg/l. The analytical performance of the MEIA method showed a CV < or = 10% and a lower limit of quantification of 1.5 microg/l, which are acceptable for routine clinical monitoring. In conclusion, the MEIA method has shown robust, stable and reproducible features with an excellent correlation with the LC-MS method.

Blood Chemical Analysis↗
PubMed2006

Sirolimus accelerates senescence of endothelial progenitor cells through telomerase inactivation.

BACKGROUND: Sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) is commonly used to prevent in-stent restenosis but is not infrequently complicated by late angiographic stent thrombosis (LAST). On the other hand, circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) play a significant role in the maintenance of endothelial integrity. AIM: We examined whether sirolimus affects differentiation, proliferative activity, senescence, colony formation, and network formation in EPCs originated from mononuclear cells (MNCs). METHODS AND RESULTS: MNCs were isolated from peripheral blood of healthy volunteers. EPCs outgrew from the culture of MNCs in the presence of vascular endothelial growth factor. When MNCs were incubated with sirolimus at 0.01, 0.1, and 1 ng/ml for 4 days, sirolimus dose-dependently reduced the number of differentiated, adherent EPCs, as assessed by an in vitro culture assay. After ex-vivo cultivation, EPCs became senescent as determined by acidic beta-galactosidase staining. When MNCs were treated with sirolimus, sirolimus dose-dependently accelerated the onset of EPCs senescence. RT-PCR analysis demonstrated that FK506-binding protein 12 (FKBP12), a receptor of sirolimus, was expressed in MNCs. To obtain an insight into the underlying downstream effects of sirolimus, we measured telomerase activity and the expression of p27(kip1). Sirolimus decreased telomerase activity dose-dependently, which was accompanied with down-regulation of the catalytic subunit, telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT). Furthermore, sirolimus up-regulated the cell cycle inhibitor p27(kip1). Having demonstrated that sirolimus accelerated the onset of senescence, we examined whether that translated into a decrease in proliferative activity and clonal expansion. Both MTS assay and BrdU incorporation assay have shown that sirolimus treatment significantly diminished the proliferative activity in EPCs. In addition, colony forming unit assay revealed that sirolimus dramatically decreased colony formation as compared to control (no treatment). Finally, in a Matrigel assay, EPCs treated with sirolimus were shown to be less integrated into the network formation than control (no treatment). CONCLUSION: The inhibitory effects of sirolimus on circulating EPCs potently may affect re-endotheliazation after SES implantation.

Blotting, Western↗
PubMed1998

The effects of relative timing of sirolimus and cyclosporine microemulsion formulation coadministration on the pharmacokinetics of each agent.

INTRODUCTION: Sirolimus and cyclosporine (INN, ciclosporin) share the same cytochrome P4503A metabolic pathways, and both drugs are substrates for p-glycoprotein countertransport. These factors most likely affect the bioavailability of both drugs. This study served to examine whether the timing of the administration of cyclosporine and sirolimus might significantly affect the relative bioavailability of one or both of these drugs. METHODS: In this randomized crossover trial, 24 stable kidney transplant recipients who were treated after transplant with a combination of sirolimus, cyclosporine, and prednisone for at least 3 months before study initiation, received individualized doses of sirolimus once daily and cyclosporine in the microemulsion formulation twice a day. A total of 20 patients completed the full crossover design. Patients were randomized to one of two dosing schedules: 10 of the patients who completed the study received the morning doses of sirolimus and cyclosporine concomitantly for the first 7 days (schedule I), and from days 8 to 14 the sirolimus dose was administered 4 hours after the morning cyclosporine dose. Ten of the patients received the sirolimus dose 4 hours after the morning cyclosporine dose for the first 7 days (schedule II), and from days 8 to 14 they received concomitant morning doses of cyclosporine and sirolimus. Pharmacokinetic profiles of sirolimus and cyclosporine performed on all patients on days 7, 14, and 15 yielded the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), peak concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (tmax), trough cyclosporine concentration (Co), and trough sirolimus concentration (Co) values. RESULTS: Sirolimus AUC and sirolimus trough levels were consistently and significantly higher when both cyclosporine and sirolimus were administered concomitantly than when they were administered 4 hours apart. No effect attributable to timing of drug administration could be found on cyclosporine pharmacokinetic parameters. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the relative timing of administration of cyclosporine and sirolimus significantly affects the blood concentrations of sirolimus.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

An immunoassay for the measurement of sirolimus.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the performance characteristics of a new microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA) for the determination of sirolimus in whole blood. BACKGROUND: In clinical investigatory studies, dose adjustments of the immunosuppressive drug sirolimus have been carried out using either high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or, more recently, this investigational immunoassay kit based on the MEIA technique. METHODS: Calibration was made over the linear range 0 to 30 ng/mL. Inaccuracy and imprecision were assessed by means of 3 control samples supplied with the kit (5, 11, and 22 ng/mL) and dilution of an above-quantitation-limit sample (154 ng/mL). Specificity was determined by the addition of 2 sirolimus metabolites to sirolimus-free human whole blood or to I of the control samples supplied with the kit. In addition, whole-blood samples from patients receiving either cyclosporine or tacrolimus (N = 24) were analyzed for sirolimus. A comparison of the MEIA and a validated HPLC/MS/MS assay analyzed both pooled samples from patients receiving sirolimus and spiked samples (sirolimus 2-60 ng/mL). In a more extensive comparison of patient samples measured by the MEIA assay, a validated HPLC assay with UV detection (HPLC-UV) was used (HPLC-UV sirolimus 7-64 ng/mL). RESULTS: Inaccuracy (between-run) was < or =16.2% at all 4 concentrations (N = 5). Within-assay imprecision (repeatability) was <6% (N = 5), and between-assay imprecision (reproducibility) for the same samples was < 11% (N = 5). Recovery, assessed by means of 3 in-house control samples prepared in both fresh and previously frozen sirolimus-free human whole blood, ranged from 93.9% to 109.5%. The limit of detection, determined by dilution of the lowest nonzero calibrator (3 ng/mL), was set at 1 ng/mL, at which repeatability was 20.5% (N = 5). Five ng/mL of hydroxysirolimus cross-reacted with the assay by a mean of between 44% and 50% (N = 4); 5 ng/mL of 41-O-demethylsirolimus cross-reacted with the assay by a mean of between 86% and 127% (N = 4). Assay specificity was further challenged by ethylenediamine-tetraacetic acid (EDTA)-whole-blood samples from transplant patients not receiving sirolimus. These samples had tacrolimus and cyclosporine concentrations of 7.8 to 15.9 ng/mL and 38 to 485 microg/L, respectively. The median result was 0 ng/mL (third quartile, 0.7 ng/mL; maximum, 1.4 ng/mL); no value was above the lowest nonzero calibrator. The results of the comparison between the MEIA and the HPLC/MS/MS assay showed mean positive biases of 21% and 8% for the MEIA in measuring sirolimus in pooled patient samples and spiked samples, respectively. The results of the comparison of the MEIA and HPLC-UV median sirolimus concentrations were 18.2 and 20.1. Whole-blood samples anticoagulated with EDTA and containing sirolimus were stable for analysis by MEIA for 3 freeze-thaw cycles when stored at -20 degrees C and for 10 days when stored at 4 degrees C or at ambient temperature. A decline in sirolimus concentration occurred when samples were stored at 37 degrees C. CONCLUSION: The MEIA showed suitable precision across a clinically relevant concentration range. In terms of patient management, the practical significance of cross-reactivity with sirolimus metabolites remains to be assessed.

Antibody Specificity↗
PubMed2004

New insights into drug absorption: studies with sirolimus.

Sirolimus is a recently marketed immunosuppressant that, in common with cyclosporine and tacrolimus, exhibits a low average oral bioavailability (approximately 20%). Likewise, sirolimus is a substrate for the major drug-metabolizing enzyme cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) and the efflux transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp), both of which are expressed in close proximity in epithelial cells lining the small intestine. Using CYP3A4-expressing Caco-2 cell monolayers, we examined the interplay between metabolism and transport on the intestinal first-pass extraction of sirolimus. Modified Caco-2 cells metabolized [14C]sirolimus to the same CYP3A4-mediated metabolites as human small intestinal and liver microsomes. [14C]Sirolimus also degraded to the known ring-opened product, seco-sirolimus. A ring-opened dihydro species (M2) was, surprisingly, the major product detected in cells at all sirolimus concentrations examined (2-100 micromol/L) and in incubations with human liver and intestinal homogenates but not in corresponding microsomes. M2 formation was NADPH-dependent but unaffected by prototypical CYP3A4 inhibitors. Although M2 was formed from purified seco-sirolimus (20 micromol/L) in the homogenates, it was not detected in cells when seco-sirolimus was added to the apical compartment because seco-sirolimus was essentially impermeable to the apical membrane. Sirolimus, seco-sirolimus (basolaterally dosed), and M2 were all secreted across the apical membrane, and secretion of each was inhibited by the P-gp inhibitor LY335979 (zosuquidar trihydrochloride). Along with CYP3A4-mediated metabolism and P-gp-mediated efflux, a novel elimination pathway was identified that may also contribute to the first-pass extraction, and hence low oral bioavailability, of sirolimus. This new insight into the intestinal elimination of sirolimus, which was not identified using traditional drug metabolism/transport screening methods, may represent another source for the limited absorption of sirolimus.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗
PubMed1996

Structural identification of three metabolites and a degradation product of the macrolide immunosuppressant sirolimus (rapamycin) by electrospray-MS/MS after incubation with human liver microsomes.

Sirolimus is a macrolide immunosuppressant that is metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A enzymes to several demethylated and/or hydroxylated metabolites, the exact structures of which have not yet been identified. In addition, sirolimus undergoes degradation in organic solvents and biological fluids. The fragmentation pattern of sirolimus after collision activated dissociation was identified. We used electrospray/MS/MS in combination with collision activated dissociation to elucidate the structures of several sirolimus metabolites and that of a degradation product after incubation of sirolimus with human liver microsomes. The following metabolites were identified: 39-O-demethyl sirolimus, 16-O-demethyl sirolimus, 12-hydroxy sirolimus, as well as the structure of the degradation product 34-hydroxy sirolimus. After incubation with human liver microsomes, 69.7% of the sirolimus derivatives detected were sirolimus, 9.3% 39-O-demethyl sirolimus, 9.3% 34-hydroxy sirolimus, 4.6% 12-hydroxy sirolimus and other hydroxylated metabolites, 2.2% 16-O-demethyl sirolimus, 3% dihydroxylated metabolites (m/z of [M + Na]+ = 968.5), 1.2% trihydroxylated metabolites (m/z of [M + Na]+ = 984.5), and 0.9% tetrahydroxylated metabolites (m/z of [M +Na]+ = 1000.5). Analysis of the fragments of the di-, tri-, and tetrahydroxylated metabolites showed that the hydroxylated sites were located between C(10) and C(27). The intensities of additional fragments was not sufficient to completely identify their structures.

Humans↗
PubMed2004

Pharmacokinetics of sirolimus in heart transplant recipients with chronic renal impairment.

BACKGROUND: A common clinical problem following organ transplantation is the development of renal failure due to calcineurin inhibitors. Sirolimus offers the potential of providing appropriate immunosuppression without nephrotoxicity. This study evaluates the impact of sirolimus monotherapy on renal function in patients late following heart transplantation and correlates trough sirolimus levels with area-under-the-concentration time curve measurements. METHODS: Six male patients with renal impairment late following heart transplantation (mean 8 years) were offered sirolimus therapy. Calcineurin inhibition was discontinued in all patients on commencing sirolimus. Patients started on sirolimus 2 to 5 mg/d orally. Venous blood samples for pharmacokinetic studies and repeat creatinine clearance were performed before and 6 weeks after commencement of sirolimus in all subjects. RESULTS: Sirolimus trough levels accurately reflected sirolimus area-under-the-concentration time curve measurements. There was no change in renal function. Mean creatinine clearance prior to commencing sirolimus was 26.7 (12.2) mL/min and the post-sirolimus creatinine clearance performed 6 weeks later was 23.4 (11.7) mL/min (P = .64). CONCLUSIONS: Trough levels of sirolimus correlate with drug exposure and may be used to monitor sirolimus therapy. No improvement in renal function following calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal occurred in this cohort.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Renal function improves in liver transplant recipients when switched from a calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus.

Sirolimus (Rapamune; Wyeth-Ayerst, Philadelphia, PA) is a newer immunosuppressive drug with no known acute or chronic nephrotoxic effects; however, limited data are available in liver transplant recipients. We prospectively evaluated changes in renal function in liver transplant recipients after conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus monotherapy. We measured serial serum creatinine levels in liver transplant recipients with chronic nephrotoxicity caused by calcineurin inhibitors before and after conversion to sirolimus therapy. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated from the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula. Change in eGFR over time, incidence of acute hepatocellular rejection, and adverse events while being administered sirolimus monotherapy were recorded. Mean interval between liver transplantation and initiation of sirolimus therapy was 310 weeks (range, 9 to 780 weeks). Of 21 patients included in our study, 18 patients were converted to sirolimus monotherapy and 3 patients were switched to sirolimus and low-dose steroid therapy. Patients were followed up for a mean of 66.8 +/- 38.9 (SD) weeks after conversion. Renal function improved in 71% of patients (15 of 21 patients). Median eGFR improved significantly from 34 mL/min/1.73 m2 at the time of conversion to 43 mL/min/1.73 m2 at the last follow-up (27% increase in eGFR; P = 001). Median monthly change in eGFR was from -0.25 mL/min/1.73 m2 pre-sirolimus therapy to +1.28 mL/min/1.73 m2 post-sirolimus therapy (P =.09). Adverse events were mostly mild and self-limited. Only 1 patient developed biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection, which was treated with sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Two patients discontinued sirolimus therapy because of toxicity (oral ulceration, 1 patient; interstitial pneumonitis, 1 patient). Renal function improved significantly in the majority of liver transplant recipients with renal insufficiency caused by calcineurin inhibitors when converted to sirolimus therapy. Sirolimus monotherapy provided adequate immunosuppression with a low incidence of acute cellular rejection and minimal adverse events.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Kinetics and dynamics of single oral doses of sirolimus in sixteen renal transplant recipients.

Sirolimus is a new immunosuppressive drug that has been evaluated in animal experiments. The current study was conducted on humans with reformulated sirolimus in doses from 3 mg/m2 to 15 mg/m2. Sixteen renal transplant recipients were included in this phase I study to determine the safety, tolerance, and preliminary pharmacokinetics of increasing single doses of orally administered sirolimus. All 16 patients had stable renal graft function after a renal transplant at least 6 months before the study. Basal immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporine and prednisolone (n = 10) or cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisolone (n = 6). Four groups (I, 3 mg/m2; II, 5 mg/m2; III, 10 mg/m2; IV, 15 mg/m2) of four patients were assigned randomly to receive sirolimus (n = 3) or placebo (n = 1). Among the 12 patients who received sirolimus, five had mild transient study events such as headache, nausea, mild dizziness, hypoglycemia, epistaxis, and decrease in platelets. No serious adverse events occurred and no nephrotoxic effects could be related to the single dose administration of sirolimus. The only study event that was judged as probably related to sirolimus was the single case of thrombocytopenia. The other events were evaluated as possibly related. Thrombocytopenia occurred at the highest dose level (15 mg/m2 sirolimus). In two of the patients in the placebo group, slight elevations of liver enzymes and serum amylase were seen. Blood and plasma sirolimus concentrations were analyzed by an electrospray-high performance liquid/mass spectrophotometric (ESP-HPLC/MS) method Sirolimus showed an extensive red blood cell distribution with a mean blood/ plasma ratio of 49.1. The elimination half-life ranged from 43.8 to 86.5 hours (mean 56.9 hours). The Cmax and the area under the concentration versus time curves (AUC) correlated reasonably with doses from 3 to 15 mg/m2. The oral dose clearance ranged from 42 to 339 ml/h.kg. No clinically significant differences were seen in the trough concentrations of cyclosporine or the AUCs before and after the administration of sirolimus. Administration of single oral doses of sirolimus from 3 to 15 mg/m2 was safe and well tolerated in stable renal transplant recipients. Thrombocytopenia may be the dose-limiting toxicity. Additional phase II and phase III clinical trials will define the immunosuppressive efficacy of sirolimus.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

Sirolimus in association with mycophenolate mofetil induction for the prevention of acute graft rejection in renal allograft recipients.

INTRODUCTION: A previous trial in renal transplantation comparing sirolimus (rapamycin) to cyclosporine (CsA) in a triple-drug therapy regimen with azathioprine and corticosteroids found that the incidence of acute rejection was similar (approximately 40%) with a trend for better renal function with sirolimus. METHODS: In 14 European centers, first cadaveric renal allograft recipients were randomized to receive sirolimus (n = 40) or CsA (n = 38) in an open-label design. All patients received corticosteroids and mycophenolate mofetil 2 g/day. Sirolimus and CsA were concentration controlled; trough levels of mycophenolic acid and prednisolone were also measured. RESULTS: At 12 months, graft survival (92.5% sirolimus vs. 89.5% CsA), patient survival (97.5% sirolimus vs. 94.7% CsA), and the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (27.5% sirolimus vs. 18.4% CsA) were not statistically different. The use of antibodies to treat suspected rejection episodes was also similar (7.5% sirolimus vs. 5.3% CsA). More sirolimus patients received bolus steroid therapy (20 vs. 11, P = 0.068). From month 2 onward, the calculated glomerular filtration rate was consistently higher in sirolimus-treated patients. The adverse events reported more frequently with sirolimus were thrombocytopenia (45% vs. 8%) and diarrhea (38% vs. 11%). In the CsA group, increased creatinine (18% vs. 39%), hyperuricemia (3% vs. 18%), cytomegalovirus infection (5% vs. 21%), and tremor (5% vs. 21%) were observed significantly more often. DISCUSSION: Patient and graft survival and the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection at 12 months were comparable between sirolimus and CsA, whereas safety profiles were different. These data suggest that sirolimus may be used as primary therapy for the prevention of acute rejection.

Acute Disease↗