SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Standardization”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed1990

National standard setting for quality of care in general practice: attitudes of general practitioners and response to a set of standards.

The Nederlands Huisartsen Genootschap (NHG), the college of general practitioners in the Netherlands, has begun a national programme of standard setting for the quality of care in general practice. When the standards have been drawn up and assessed they are disseminated via the journal Huisarts en Wetenschap. In a survey, carried out among a randomized sample of 10% of all general practitioners, attitudes towards national standard setting in general and to the first set of standards (diabetes care) were studied. The response was 70% (453 doctors). A majority of the respondents said they were well informed about the national standard setting initiatives instigated by the NHG (71%) and about the content of the first standards (77%). The general practitioners had a positive attitude towards the setting of national standards for quality of care, and this was particularly true for doctors who were members of the NHG. Although a large majority of doctors said they agreed with most of the guidelines in the diabetes standards fewer respondents were actually working to the guidelines and some of the standards are certain to meet with a lot of resistance. A better knowledge of the standards and a more positive attitude to the process of national standard setting correlated with a more positive attitude to the guidelines formulated in the diabetes standards. The results could serve as a starting point for an exchange of views about standard setting in general practice in other countries.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMed1996

Standards for polysomnography in Canada. The Standards Committees of the Canadian Sleep Society and the Canadian Thoracic Society.

OBJECTIVE: To develop standards for polysomnography in Canada in order to assist in the uniform provision of diagnostic and therapeutic services related to sleep disorders. OPTIONS: Uniform testing versus no current Canadian standards. OUTCOMES: Uniform delivery of health care; reduction in number of repeat studies and their attendant costs. EVIDENCE: Availability of diagnostic laboratories and services, and survey responses (written and oral) from directors of sleep laboratories; the American Thoracic Society statement on indications and standards for cardiopulmonary sleep studies was used as a template. VALUES: Acceptable standards of practice were based on consensus opinion of the standards committees of the Canadian Sleep Society and the Canadian Thoracic Society. The committees comprised specialists in neurology, psychiatry, psychology, respirology and polysomnographic technology; family practitioners and otolaryngologists were also consulted. BENEFITS, HARMS, COSTS: Improved level of care and reduction in duplicate or unnecessary testing; establishment, with available resources, of diagnostic sleep laboratories by appropriately qualified physicians in areas where polysomnography is unavailable. RECOMMENDATIONS: Health care practitioners involved in the diagnosis and treatment of sleep disorders should possess a minimum amount of training (both clinical and research) in sleep disorders medicine. The variables recorded and findings entered in a patient's report must be relevant to the sleep disorder under investigation. The recording equipment must provide reliable, accurate and reproducible data and lend itself to appropriate calibration and quality-control procedures. Facilities for sleep studies must meet patient care safety standards, with provisions for emergency or resuscitative measures when necessary; all personnel must be trained in basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation. VALIDATION: No previous standards concerning polysomnography in Canada exist. The recommended standards were reviewed by all members of the Canadian Sleep Society and a revised document was approved by the Standards Committee of the Canadian Sleep Society and by the Standards and Executive committees of the Canadian Thoracic Society. SPONSORS: These standards are endorsed by the Canadian Sleep Society and the Canadian Thoracic Society. The cost of preparing this statement was borne by the individual members of the standards committees; no external funding was provided.

Calibration↗

PubMed1990

Standardization and harmonization of the blood count: the role of International Committee for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH).

Scientific principles of standardization were first applied in haematology in 1963 when the International Committee for Standardization in Haematology was established with a primary objective to improve the measurement of haemoglobin. Subsequently, ICSH has established Expert Panels on a wide range of haematological topics, including especially a Panel on Cytometry. The purpose of haematological standardization is to obtain precision, accuracy, specificity and harmonization of results between different laboratories in all countries and also between different instruments or methods in the same laboratory. To achieve these objectives ICSH sponsors collaborative studies by scientists from academic centres and from industry and uses a consensus procedure for establishing standards on the basis of the scientific data, followed by an educational programme to ensure that the standards are adopted worldwide. ICSH defines material standards and standardized methods. Material standards are classified as primary international standards, certified reference materials, secondary standards and calibrators. These must be distinguished from control preparations which are intended exclusively for quality control. Standardization of methods must also be considered at four levels: definitive, reference, selected and routine. Each has a place in practice but their roles must be clearly defined. ICSH has an established protocol for evaluation of automated blood cell counters. This defines the levels of precision and accuracy of instrument performance. It is also necessary to assess "clinical utility". The main requirement of the practising haematologist is clinical reliability and harmonization of results for comparability. One of the major functions of ICSH is to provide an interface for collaboration between the manufacturers who develop the instruments and the users in order to achieve this goal.

Anticoagulants↗

PubMed1998

Age standardization of death rates: implementation of the year 2000 standard.

This report discusses the rationale for and implications of the implementation of a new population standard for the age standardization (age adjustment) of death rates. The new standard is based on the year 2000 population and beginning with data year 1999, will replace the existing standard based on the 1940 population. This report also includes a technical discussion of direct and indirect standardization and statistical variability in age-adjusted death rates. Currently, at least three different standards are used among Department of Health and Human Services agencies. Implementation of the year 2000 standard will reduce confusion among data users and the burden on State and local agencies. Use of the year 2000 standard will also result in age-adjusted death rates that are substantially larger than those based on the 1940 standard. Further, the new standard will affect trends in age-adjusted death rates for certain causes of death and will narrow race differentials in age-adjusted death rates. Although age standardization is an important and useful tool, it has some limitations. As a result the examination of age-adjusted death rates should be the beginning of an analysis strategy.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1996

Setting standards of prescribing performance in primary care: use of a consensus group of general practitioners and application of standards to practices in the north of England.

BACKGROUND: There is considerable variation in prescribing, and existing standards against which primary care prescribing is routinely judged consist largely of local or national averages. There is thus a need for more sophisticated standards, which must be widely applicable and have credibility among the general practice profession. AIM: A study aimed to develop a range of criteria of prescribing quality, to set standards of performance for these criteria, and apply these standards to practices. METHOD: A consensus group consisting of eight general practitioners and a resource team was convened to develop and define criteria and set standards of prescribing performance using prescribing analyses and cost (PACT) data. The standards were applied to 1992-93 prescribing data from all 518 practices in the former Northern Regional Health Authority. RESULTS: The group developed criteria and set numeric standards for 13 aspects of prescribing performance in four areas: generic prescribing, prescribing within specific therapeutic groups, drugs of limited clinical value and standards based on prescribing volume. Except for generic prescribing, standards for individual criteria were achieved by between 9% and 34% of practices. For each criterion, a score was allocated based on whether the standard was achieved or not. Total scores showed considerable variation between practices. The distribution of scores was similar between fundholding and non-fundholding practices, and also between dispensing and non-dispensing practices. CONCLUSION: Using a consensus group of general practitioners it is possible to agree criteria and standards of prescribing performance. This novel approach offers a professionally driven method for assessing the quality of prescribing in primary care.

Drug Prescriptions↗

PubMed1998

Calculation of standard transformed formation properties of biochemical reactants and standard apparent reduction potentials of half reactions.

The standard Gibbs energies of formation and standard enthalpies of formation of species involved in biochemical reactions are used to calculate standard transformed Gibbs energies of formation and standard transformed enthalpies of formation of 62 biochemical reactants (sums of species) at 298.15 K, pH 7, and ionic strengths of 0, 0.10, and 0.25 M. It has been possible to put the oxidized and reduced forms of some reactants in this table because their standard apparent reduction potentials are known at pH 7. This paper emphasizes redox reactions. Two applications have been made of these 62 new values of standard transformed Gibbs energies of formation at pH 7: (1) They have been used to calculate standard transformed Gibbs energies of formation of 16 more biochemical reactants from measurements of apparent equilibrium constants of redox reactions. (2) They have been used to calculate standard apparent reduction potentials at pH 7 for half reactions involving reactants discussed in this article and the previous one. This table of standard apparent reduction potentials can be extended considerably from known apparent equilibrium constants for enzyme-catalyzed redox reactions. This brings the total number of reactants for which the standard transformed Gibbs energy of formation at 298K, pH 7, and ionic strengths of 0, 0.10, and 0.25 M have been calculated to 142.

Energy Transfer↗

PubMed1993

An imaging standard for dentistry. Extension of the radiology DICOM standard.

No standard exists for electronic communication of dental images. However, maxillofacial radiology, being part of general radiology, does have the advantage of having an applicable standard: The American College of Radiology-National Electrical Manufacturers Association Standard for Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (Version 3.0). This standard encourages open systems interconnection of imaging equipment over standard networks while maintaining compatibility with earlier point-to-point connection standards. This standard, to be voted on in 1993, moves the American College of Radiology-National Electrical Manufacturers Association into full conformance with the International Standards Organization reference model for network communications. An object-oriented information model lays the groundwork for harmonization with other medical communications standards. This article outlines the American College of Radiology-National Electrical Manufacturers Association components and discusses the rationale of object-oriented design. The relevance of the standard to dentistry is discussed.

Computer Communication Networks↗

PubMed1998

Fielding standardized patients in primary care settings: lessons from a study using unannounced standardized patients to assess preventive care practices.

OBJECTIVES: To document detection and suspicion rates of unannounced standardized patients visiting community-based practices. DESIGN: Primary care physicians were recruited to participate in a study using standardized patients. Four standardized patient scenarios were used. SETTING: Community-based primary care physicians' practices in southern Ontario between September 1994 and August 1995. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-two primary care physicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A 'believability' questionnaire completed after all four standardized patients had visited the practices. RESULTS: Of the primary care physicians approached, 50% (62) agreed to participate. Twenty-one per cent of all visits were suspected as standardized patient encounters. Forty-six per cent suspected one or more standardized patients. Only five physicians (8%) suspected all four standardized patients. Reasons for suspecting standardized patients were associated with the characteristics of the physician's practices, the physician's practice profile and the standardized patient cover story. CONCLUSION: The portrayal of asymptomatic patients seeking a new primary care physician presents unique challenges. Carefully constructed cover stories, and detailed knowledge of the local area and of the practices of the participating physicians is required to allow standardized patients cases to be tailored to fit into primary care settings without arousing suspicion.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Standardizing flow cytometry: a classification system of fluorescence standards used for flow cytometry.

The growing number of standards commercially available in the field of flow cytometry makes it difficult to know which standards to use to obtain a desired level of quality assurance. A classification system of fluorescence standards has been developed on the basis of their physical characteristics. In turn, these physical characteristics determine the ability of the specific standards to perform selected functions, such as alignment, target referencing, compensation, and calibration. Knowing the properties and limitations of specific standards will help flow cytometer users to select the appropriate standard for the application that they will be performing, especially in regard to intra- and interlaboratory quality assurance. Common protocols used in conjunction with specific classifications of reference standards can provide unified analysis regions or window of analysis across different instruments and/or laboratories. In addition, specific classifications of calibration standards can help select those standards that will provide independent and direct comparison of instrument performance parameters, especially in studies involving multiple laboratories. Knowledge and understanding of the classification system can guide flow cytometer users in more efficient and accurate instrument setup and quality control when conducting research, as well as clinical applications.

Calibration↗

PubMed1979