SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Sternotomy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2001

Ministernotomy versus complete sternotomy for coronary bypass operations: no difference in postoperative pulmonary function.

OBJECTIVES: Less-invasive approaches in cardiac operations offer certain cosmetic advantages, but it is unclear whether there are additional positive effects with regard to the postoperative recovery of patients. The aim of this prospective and randomized study was to ascertain whether partial inferior midline sternotomy can improve pulmonary function, one of the best quantifiable parameters of postoperative recovery, after coronary artery bypass operations when compared with the standard full midline approach. METHODS: One hundred patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting were randomized either for a full median sternotomy (standard sternotomy group, n = 50) or for a partial inferior sternotomy (ministernotomy group, n = 50). The following pulmonary features were assessed: vital capacity, forced expiratory volume, percentage of forced expiratory volume from vital capacity, total lung capacity, residual volume, maximum inspiratory pressure, and maximum expiratory pressure. Tests were performed preoperatively and on the fourth and tenth postoperative days. RESULTS: On the fourth postoperative day, both groups had a significant decrease in vital capacity (percentage of predicted values) when compared with preoperative values (preoperative vs fourth day: standard sternotomy group, 87.8% +/- 14.3% vs 42.1% +/- 10.2% [P <.0001]; ministernotomy group, 84.5% +/- 14.3% vs 41.5% +/- 11.8% [P <.0001]), with a significant tendency for recovery from the fourth to the tenth postoperative day (fourth vs tenth postoperative day: standard sternotomy group, 42.1% +/- 10.2% vs 66.3% +/- 12.3% [P =.001]; ministernotomy group, 41.5% +/- 11.8% vs 61.3% +/- 13.1 % [P =.002]). There were no differences in any test results between the groups on either the fourth or the tenth postoperative day. CONCLUSION: A less-invasive approach for coronary artery bypass operations with a partial inferior sternotomy does not improve early postoperative pulmonary function when compared with the conventional approach with a full sternotomy.

Coronary Artery Bypass↗

PubMed1996

Haemodynamic responses to incision and sternotomy in relation to the auditory evoked potential and spontaneous EEG.

We investigated the effect of incision and sternotomy on the auditory evoked potential (AEP) and EEG, to try to predict a haemodynamic response to incision or sternotomy using the AEP and EEG in 41 patients undergoing cardiac surgery during propofol and alfentanil anaesthesia. The AEP and EEG were recorded before incision, between incision and sternotomy, and after sternotomy. Peak latencies and amplitudes of AEP peaks V, Na, Pa, Nb, Pb and Nc were determined. From the EEG the median, spectral edge and peak power frequencies, and percentages of delta, theta, alpha and beta power were calculated. Each patient was classified as responsive, equivocally responsive or unresponsive to incision or sternotomy based on increase in arterial pressure and heart rate on incision and sternotomy. Before incision, Nb and Pb latency and propofol concentration were higher for unresponsive patients but heart rate and median frequency before incision were lower. After sternotomy, Pa and Nb amplitude, peak power frequency and percentage alpha power were higher, and percentage theta power lower for responsive patients. Pa latency was higher after sternotomy for unresponsive patients. Using a combination of heart rate, arterial pressures and features derived from the AEP (all recorded before incision), the occurrence of a response to incision could be predicted in individual patients with a sensitivity of 85%, positive predictive accuracy of 63% and total accuracy of 72%. We conclude that AEP are more sensitive to pain stimuli than spectral features of the spontaneous EEG. In addition, the AEP may help in predicting inadequate anaesthesia.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Changes in lung function and respiratory muscle strength after sternotomy vs. laparotomy in patients without ventilatory limitation.

A relevant ventilatory defect occurs after sternotomy, a very common thoracic surgical opening. The mechanism of the ventilatory impairment is unclear. Moreover, until now, the effect of sternotomy on pulmonary gas exchange has scarcely been investigated. We evaluated the time-course up to recovery and changes in spirometry, maximum static inspiratory (PI(max)) and expiratory (PE(max)) mouth pressures and pulmonary gas exchange in 6 patients after sternotomy and in 8 patients after laparotomy. All patients were free of cardiopulmonary diseases and had normal preoperative lung function. Sternotomy and laparotomy decreased forced vital capacity (FVC) by 67 and 49%, respectively. Moreover, the percent decreases in PI(max), PE(max) and PaO(2) after sternotomy vs. laparotomy were respectively 54 vs. 57%, 54 vs. 60%, and 22.6 vs. 7.5% (p < 0.05). Following sternotomy, the percent decreases in FVC correlated with the percent decreases in PI(max) (p < 0.05) and PE(max) (p < 0.01). The return to baseline values occurred after approximately 2 weeks. The present study shows that sternotomy can induce greater respiratory effects than laparotomy and suggests a relevant involvement of respiratory muscle weakness after surgical opening of the thorax. The study also supports the view that the evaluation of patient's lung function before sternotomy can be clinically relevant.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1983

Median sternotomy for resection of pulmonary metastases.

Thoracic surgeons have been reluctant to adopt the median sternotomy as a suitable approach to pulmonary operations. However, its lesser functional morbidity and the capability to assess both lungs are advantageous in selected patients. Examined herein is a concentrated experience with 53 median sternotomies in 46 patients for the resection of pulmonary metastases. Forty of the 46 patients had soft tissue or osteogenic sarcoma. Full-lung tomograms diagnosed but did not accurately reflect the extent of disease. Fifty-three percent more tumor nodules were found at median sternotomy than were seen on full-lung tomography. Eleven of 18 patients (61%) thought to have unilateral disease by full-lung tomography had bilateral metastases found at median sternotomy. Most median sternotomies involved wedge resections (mean 8.9 range one to 52). Two segmentectomies, six lobectomies, and one pneumonectomy were also performed. Repeat median sternotomy was accomplished seven times; one patient underwent four median sternotomies. Sixty-six percent of the nodules removed proved to be tumor. Complications included one reoperation for bleeding; three patients had air leaks for more than 1 week, including one bronchopleural fistula; four required respirator assistance for more than 3 days; and there were four major infections. There was no operative mortality. Because of its low morbidity, the high incidence of unsuspected bilateral disease, and the elimination of a second operative procedure, median sternotomy is the approach of choice for the surgical treatment of pulmonary metastases.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2000

Partial sternotomy ("C" incision) as standard access for full range of adult cardiac operations.

OBJECTIVE: In our institute, partial sternotomy has been adopted for standard access in the full range of adult cardiac operations, including coronary artery bypass grafting. In this study, our clinical experience is reviewed. METHODS: Since April 1998, of 100 cardiac surgical patients, 64 underwent partial sternotomy, while 36 patients had the traditional full sternotomy because of high surgical risk factors or anatomical reasons. Most of the patients having minimal access had a "C" incision, that is, a left lower partial sternotomy. RESULTS: The procedures performed with the "C" incision were coronary artery bypass grafting, valve surgery, aortic root replacement, closure of atrial septal defect, and so on. There were two hospital deaths after partial sternotomy. Compared with full sternotomy patients, partial sternotomy patients had a shorter hospital stay, while their bypass times were longer. Their skin incisions were 11.7 cm on average. CONCLUSION: The "C" incision can provide satisfying results and can serve as the standard approach in the full range of cardiac operations.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Effect of prior sternotomy on mortality and morbidity after heart transplantation. Cardiac Transplant Team.

A retrospective analysis to evaluate the impact of prior sternotomy on the outcome of cardiac transplantation was undertaken. Some 165 patients who received primary heart transplantation were classified into three groups. There were 102 patients in group 1 (no prior sternotomy), 47 in group 2 (one prior sternotomy), and 16 in group 3 (more than one prior sternotomy). The three groups were demographically similar. Coronary artery bypass was the indication for prior sternotomy in 77% of patients in group 2 and in 94% in group 3. Mortality within 30 days post-transplant was significantly different among the three groups (group 1, 7.8%; group 2, 8.5%; group 3, 31%; P = 0.0148). The 1-year actuarial survival was also significantly lower in group 3 (52%) compared with groups 1 (83%) and 2 (81%) (P = 0.0311). Multivariate analysis identified more than one prior sternotomy and pulmonary hypertension as risk factors for death within 30 days post-transplant. Patients who had prior sternotomy also had a higher incidence of coagulopathy (group 1, 17%; group 2, 49%; group 3, 38%; P = 0.0002), and re-exploration due to excessive bleeding (group 1, 5%; group 2, 11%; group 3, 25%; P = 0.0225). Requirement for blood products for transfusion was also higher in groups 2 and 3. There was no significant difference among the three groups in the incidence of early infections (50% versus 53% versus 44%), renal failure (6% versus 11% versus 19%), or allograft rejection in patients who survived the first 30 days (95% versus 86% versus 82%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Cause of Death↗

PubMed2003

Three or more median sternotomies for patients with valve disease: role of computed tomography.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the effects of computed tomographic (CT) scan-guided third or fourth median sternotomies for valve operations on the incidence of resternotomy-related complications and early mortality. METHODS: Ninety patients undergoing valve replacement with third or fourth time sternotomy were divided into two groups. One group (CT group) consisted of 64 patients who had undergone routine CT scans preoperatively after 1991 to assess the possibility of sternotomy-related bleeding, and the other group (no CT group) comprised the remaining 26 patients who did not receive CT scans. RESULTS: Hospital death occurred in 4 patients (6%) in the CT group and in 6 patients (23%) in the no CT group (p = 0.0309). Multivariate analysis indicated NYHA class 4 (odds ratio [OR] = 6.99) and year of operation (OR = 1.05) to be predictors of hospital death. Preoperative CT scans revealed that 8 patients were considered to be high risk for resternotomy, they underwent femorofemoral bypass before sternal division was performed. Hemorrhage occurred upon sternal reentry in 2 of these 8 patients. The incidences of sternotomy-related injury were 19% (5/26) in the no CT group and only 3% (2/64) in the CT group (p = 0.0198). Multivariate analyses demonstrated a fourth sternotomy (OR = 4.31) to be a predictor of resternotomy-related injury. CONCLUSIONS: CT scans provide preoperative information on retrosternal adhesions. When a distended heart or expanded aorta has adhered to the sternum, femorofemoral cannulation should be performed before sternotomy. Third and fourth sternotomies, though demanding procedures, can be performed safely using the described strategy.

Blood Loss, Surgical↗

PubMed1999

Partial versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Recent trends suggest that smaller incisions reduce postoperative morbidity. This study tests the hypothesis that a partial upper sternotomy improves patient outcome for aortic valve replacement. METHODS: A group of 50 patients who underwent aortic valve surgery through a partial upper sternotomy (group I) were compared to 50 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement through a median sternotomy during the same time period (group II). The mean age (60+/-2 versus 63+/-2 years; mean +/- SEM) and preoperative ejection fractions (53+/-2 versus 54+/-2) were similar. Operations were performed with central cannulation, and antegrade/retrograde blood cardioplegia. RESULTS: There was one death in each group. No differences were found in aortic occlusion time, mediastinal drainage, transfusion incidence, narcotic requirement, length of stay, or cost. The incidence of pleural and pericardial effusions was increased (18.4% versus 3.9%, p < 0.03), and the need for postoperative inotropic support was higher (38.7% versus 19.6%, p < 0.03) in the partial sternotomy group. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic valve replacement can be performed through a partial sternotomy with results comparable to full sternotomy. The partial sternotomy offers a cosmetic benefit, but does not significantly reduce postoperative pain, length of stay, or cost.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

The incidence of chronic post-sternotomy pain after cardiac surgery--a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Post-sternotomy pain is sometimes a sequela of cardiac surgery. The incidence, characteristics and clinical course of post-sternotomy pain are not well known. The aim of our study was to determine the incidence of chronic post-sternotomy pain in patients undergoing sternotomy for cardiac surgery in general and according to the specific surgical procedure. METHOD: In a prospective manner, a group of 349 consecutive patients were evaluated for chronic post-sternotomy pain one year after surgery. The patients were asked in a postal questionnaire to describe and score any persistent pain following the surgical procedure. The patients were classified into 3 sub-groups according to surgical procedure. The first group consisted of patients operated for coronary artery by-pass grafting (CABG) including internal thoracic artery grafting (ITAG). The second group included patients operated with CABG without ITAG and the third group of patients with valve replacement without CABG. RESULT: A total of 318 patients (91%) answered the questionnaire of whom 90 (28%) reported chest discomfort different from what they experienced before surgery. The scoring on the visual analogue scale (VAS, 0-100 mm) showed that 41 patients (13%) reported maximum pain intensity > or =30 mm (moderate pain), and 14 of these patients (4%) scored > or =54 mm (severe pain). There was no statistically significant difference in pain incidence and pain intensity when comparing the patients subjected to different surgical procedures. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study shows that the overall incidence of non-cardiac pain after sternotomy for cardiac surgery is high (28%). Most patients experience a modest pain intensity but some (1%) report severe pain, never being lower than 54 mm on VAS. The study also indicates that the incidence of pain after sternotomy is not only associated with harvest of the ITA and additional aetiological factors must be sought.

Adult↗

PubMed1990

An approach to reoperative median sternotomy.

Cardiac reoperations using a previous median sternotomy incision are becoming more common as the population of patients who have had cardiac surgery increases. Repeat median sternotomy can be complicated by major hemorrhage and secondary myocardial ischemia. A standard approach to reoperative median sternotomy has been developed over the past several years at Georgetown University. Details of the method are presented. From January 1, 1980 through April 30, 1988, 179 patients underwent repeat median sternotomy. The technical approach to the operation became standard as of July 1,1983. Two of 66 patients operated before this date sustained major hemorrhage requiring emergent institution of cardiopulmonary bypass. One mortality in the group was directly related to hemorrhage at the sternotomy. No episode of major hemorrhage and no mortality related to the sternotomy occurred in 113 patients who underwent repeat sternotomy after July 1, 1983. Reoperation for bleeding occurred in 8.4% of the patients. We believe the technical considerations presented increase the safety of reoperative cardiac surgery.

Blood Loss, Surgical↗

PubMedDate not supplied

The use of transesophageal echocardiography to guide sternal division for cardiac operations via mini-sternotomy.

Cardiac surgery utilizing the mini-sternotomy technique offers many advantages, including lessened pain and hospitalization. Mid-line upper sternotomy (or mini-sternotomy) can provide adequate exposure of the ascending aorta, the aortic root, the right atrial appendage and the dome of the left atrium. Inherent in providing adequate exposure is the level at which the sternum is "T'd" off. The lower aspect of the sternotomy is "T'd" off at the second, third, or fourth intercostal space depending on the patient's anatomy. We describe a technique that uses transesophageal echocardiography to determine the precise location for "T'ing" off the sternotomy, rather than approximating the sternotomy site by physical exam and chest radiograph. This technique will reliably delineate the sternotomy site, irrespective of a patient's body size and habitus.

Cardiac Surgical Procedures↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Cardiac valve operations using a partial sternotomy (lower half) technique.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Operations on cardiac valves are being performed more frequently through smaller incisions than traditional midline sternotomy. A variety of alternate incisions have been used, but most of the interest appears to focus on partial sternotomy. The purpose of the study was to review results using a partial lower sternotomy for cardiac valve operations. METHODS: A standard partial lower one-half or two-thirds sternotomy was used for cardiac valve operations in 112 patients. The sternum was divided transversely in the third or second intercostal space and vertically from that point through the xyphoid process. Standard instruments and retraction devices were used. This incision provided adequate exposure for even complex operations to be performed. Small cannulae were placed into the aorta and heart through the primary incision for cardiopulmonary bypass. Vacuum-assisted venous drainage was used. RESULTS: Seventy-four single valve operations were performed. There were 35 double valve and 5 triple valve operations (35.4%) performed. Operative mortality (5.3%) and major complication rates were comparable to full the sternotomy approach. CONCLUSIONS: Partial sternotomy (lower half) provides a smaller incision through which virtually all cardiac valve operations may be performed. Results achieved with this approach are similar to those associated with full sternotomy. The smaller incision is appreciated by patients.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Reversed-J inferior versus full median sternotomy: which is better for awake coronary bypass surgery.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to ascertain whether the approach with a less invasive reversed-J inferior sternotomy could improve intraoperative patient compliance and postoperative recovery than the standard median sternotomy. METHODS: Seventeen patients underwent elective single coronary artery bypass graft operation under high thoracic epidural anesthesia without endotracheal intubation. The reversed-J sternotomy was performed in 10 patients (Group A) and full sternotomy in 7 patients (Group B). The technical and surgical difficulties, pulmonary functions (by spirometric tests) and hospital stay were assessed. RESULTS: Through the reversed-J sternotomy coronary revascularization was accomplished without any additional technical difficulties and with a good exposure of both the left anterior descending artery and the left internal thoracic artery. No conversion to standard sternotomy and no intubation were observed. Additional doses of local anesthetic at jugular notch was not required in Group A. Pleura was opened more in Group B (57% vs. 20%; p = 0.14). Oxygen saturation was better in Group A during the surgical procedure (98.8 +/- 0.7% vs. 97.1 +/- 2.1%; p = 0.033), however, intraoperative PaCO2 was similar in both the groups. The patients in Group A were discharged from the hospital earlier (3.2 +/- 1.5 vs. 7.3 +/- 3.5 days; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Less invasive approach to coronary artery bypass graft operations is possible through combination of the high thoracic epidural anesthesia and a reversed-J sternotomy. This technique is less traumatic for patient and provides practical better oxygenation and shorter hospital stay.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Direct complications of repeat median sternotomy in adults.

Whilst the potential risk to underlying vital structures from redo-sternotomy is well recognized, the actual risk is poorly quantified. Our aim was to determine the incidence of complications directly attributable to redo-sternotomy and to ascertain whether the use of femoro-femoral CPB (FF) prior to redo-sternotomy alters operative morbidity and mortality. Case notes of 185 patients undergoing cardiac surgery necessitating redo-sternotomy between May 1998 and November 2002 were reviewed. Of 121 males and 64 females, the median age was 65.5 years (range 60.1-75 years). Elective FF was performed in 71 (38.3%) of cases and 114 (60%) were performed without the aid of prior femoro-femoral CPB (WFF). Three (1.6%) patients initially planned for WFF were converted to emergency FF due to serious complications. Complications directly attributable to redo-sternotomy occurred in 21 (11.3%) cases; 12 (16.9%) in the FF group and 9 (5.3%) in the WFF group. Overall mortality was 1.6%. In summary, our results suggest that morbidity risk for the operation increases significantly with redo-sternotomy alone. Three deaths in our series from direct complications attributable to redo-sternotomy signify an added risk. Hence the necessity for careful surgical technique and judicious use of elective FF-CPB is emphasized.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

Evaluation of different minimally invasive techniques in pediatric cardiac surgery: is a full sternotomy always a necessity?

STUDY OBJECTIVES: A variety of minimally invasive techniques have been recently introduced in adult cardiac surgery. Experiences with children and newborns are, however, limited. In this report, we present our first experiences with different methods of ministernotomies for closure of atrial septum defect (ASD) and ventricular septum defect (VSD) in pediatric cardiac patients. Also, the current literature for different surgical approaches is reviewed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five pediatric patients (range, 4 months to 12 years old) underwent elective ASD or VSD closure. Surgical access was either without division of the sternum (group A, n = 5), with partial inferior sternotomy (group B, n = 5), total sternotomy with limited skin incision (group C, n = 5), or total sternotomy with full skin incision (group D, n = 10). RESULTS: There were no severe intraoperative complications regarding exposure, cannulation, or bleeding. Conversion to full sternotomy was not necessary in any patient. Bypass time and cross-clamp time in groups A, B, and C were comparable to the standard operation (group D). However, preparation time was significantly increased in one minimally invasive group (group A vs group D, p<0.05). Despite general feasibility, the transxiphoidal access without sternotomy compromises exposure of the ascending aorta, resulting in impaired administration of cross-clamping, cardioplegia, and especially de-airing. CONCLUSIONS: Transatrial pediatric cardiac operations can be performed without or with limited sternotomy. The partial sternotomy allows uncompromised exposure of the great vessels and should be favored over the transxiphoidal approach. The operative access and perioperative risk is comparable to a classical standard surgical approach. Advantages include improved cosmetic results in combination with a high degree of safety.

Cardiac Surgical Procedures↗

PubMed2003

Chest pain after partial upper versus complete sternotomy for aortic valve surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate pain and pulmonary function after partial upper versus complete sternotomy for aortic valve surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a prospective study of 31 adult patients, 15 individuals underwent aortic valve replacement via partial upper sternotomy, and 16 patients were operated on by means of a full median sternotomy. Chest pain was assessed at rest, after spirometry and coughing, using the visual analogue scale and a structured questionnaire. Forced expiratory volume at I second and forced vital capacity were measured by a hand-held spirometer. Minimal-access patients had less postoperative pain and improved pulmonary function in comparison with conventional aortic valve replacement. After partial upper sternotomy, the postoperative chest pain was confined to the sternal area, while after standard sternotomy a more generalized chest pain occurred. Differences in pain scores could still be demonstrated one month after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that partial upper sternotomy improves pulmonary function and reduces pain in comparison with standard full sternotomy.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Benefits and complications of total sternotomy and ministernotomy in cardiac surgery.

Ministernotomy (MS) is a well-known procedure developed in the past ten years along with the rise of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Upper, mid, or inferior partial sternotomies allow coronary surgery, as well as aortic and mitral valve approaches. Contrary to anterior thoracotomy, access to the great vessels is sometimes easy, which renders central cannulation possible. In opposition to total sternotomy (TS), MS could procure better postoperative stability that would aide in reduction of wound infections. Nevertheless, upper MS can be responsible for the lesion of the internal thoracic arteries (ITAs). Moreover, little evidence exists regarding blood sparing in MS approaches. MS presents the problem of hiding a part of the cardiac structures. For example, in the case of aortic surgery by way of upper sternotomy for example, left venting is risky or even impossible. However, partial inferior sternotomy can be interesting for aortic valve surgery in patients with in situ right ITA passing in front of the aorta, protecting the grafts during dissection. In coronary surgery, inferior T sternotomy and C sternotomy allow perfect access to the coronary network. Some authors also have described inferior "T" sternotomy for various congenital lesions. If mini-invasive cardiac surgery can offer reduced postoperative morbidity and faster rehabilitation, the advantages of MS upon TS--except for cosmetic aspects--remain to be defined. Thus, this approach should be reserved for selected patients and lesions.

Angioplasty↗

PubMed1992

Transthoracic defibrillation: effect of sternotomy on chest impedance.

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of sternotomy on transthoracic impedance, a major determinant of current flow and defibrillation success. Transthoracic impedance was determined by using a validated test-pulse technique that does not require actual shocks. Seventeen patients undergoing median sternotomy were studied prospectively. Transthoracic impedance was determined before operation, 3 to 5 days after operation and (in eight patients) greater than or equal to 1 month after operation. When measured using paddle electrodes placed in the standard apex-right parasternal defibrillating position, transthoracic impedance declined after sternotomy in all patients, from 77 +/- 18 to 59 +/- 17 omega (p less than 0.01); smaller declines were demonstrated by using other electrode positions. Transthoracic impedance remained below the preoperative level in the eight patients who underwent a second set of measurements at least 1 month after operation. Six normal subjects not undergoing sternotomy underwent serial transthoracic impedance measurements at least 5 days apart; mean transthoracic impedance did not change. It is concluded that transthoracic impedance declines after sternotomy. At any operator-selected energy level a higher current flow will result after sternotomy; this may facilitate postoperative defibrillation.

Cardiography, Impedance↗