PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Stroke Volume”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Relations of Doppler stroke volume and its components to left ventricular stroke volume in normotensive and hypertensive American Indians: the Strong Heart Study.

Doppler echocardiographic measurement of time-velocity integral of blood flow across the aortic annulus ("stroke distance") or of stroke volume (SV) have been proposed as noninvasive measures of cardiac pump performance that could elucidate the hemodynamics of hypertension. To evaluate the performance of these measures of hemodynamic volume load in a population with a wide range of body build and other characteristics, we obtained technically adequate imaging and Doppler echocardiograms in 1,935 of 2,212 (87%) American Indian Strong Heart Study participants, without mitral regurgitation or segmental left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, in Arizona, Oklahoma, and South/North Dakota. The subjects ranged widely in age (48 to 81 years) and body mass index (17.0 to 62.6 kg/m2); 65% were women; 1,161 were normotensive and 774 were hypertensive. As a reference standard, LV and stroke volumes were calculated from LV internal dimensions by the Teichholz method. Doppler SVs were moderately related to LV SVs (r = 0.63), but Doppler SV was slightly lower in both normotensive (mean = 69.8 and 72.9 mL, respectively) and hypertensive subjects (71.1 v 73.6 mL). Aortic stroke distance was less closely related than was aortic annular area to LV SV (r = 0.34 v 0.40, P < .001). Aortic annular area (r = 0.44) but not stroke distance (r = 0.04) was moderately correlated with body surface area. Stroke distance was inversely related to annular area (r = -0.29) and in subjects stratified by aortic annular diameter 1.6 to 1.9, 2.0 to 2.1, and 2.3 to 2.9 cm, mean LV SV increased from 67 to 74 to 80 mL, but average stroke distance fell from 22.8 to 21.6 to 20.1 cm. Stroke distance also failed to identify gender differences in LV SV but did identify that due to obesity. Thus Doppler SV closely parallels independently measured LV SV but slightly underestimates SV in both normotensive and hypertensive adults, whereas aortic stroke distance yields misleading comparisons between genders or individuals of different body sizes.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Beat-to-beat analysis of left ventricular pressure-volume relation and stroke volume by conductance catheter and aortic Modelflow in cardiomyoplasty patients.

BACKGROUND: Since the clinical introduction of dynamic cardiomyoplasty, a discrepancy has been observed between unchanged measurements of cardiac function and improved clinical outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a beat-to-beat analysis of cardiac performance at rest in nine cardiomyoplasty patients 6 to 24 months after operation. Conductance and micromanometer catheters were placed in left ventricle and aorta and used for measurements over a 15-second period, during which the wrapped latissimus dorsi (LD) muscle was stimulated for 10 seconds in a 1:2 synchronization mode followed by a 5-second period without LD stimulation. The synchronization delay between start of the QRS complex and the LD contraction was changed from 4 up to 125 ms at the patient's clinical stimulation strength and at an increased supramaximal amplitude. Comparing the LD assisted period to the unassisted period, at the clinical settings no significant changes in stroke volume (SV) as measured by the conductance technique and the aortic Modelflow technique were observed. A significant (P < .05) rise in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) was observed directly after the assisted 10-second period. The peak ejection rate (PER) of left ventricular volume increased (P < .05), with a mean of 28 +/- 23% during the LD stimulated beats. At the patient's individual best setting, SV of the stimulated beats increased (P < .01) by a mean of 20 +/- 15%. Systolic aortic pressure increased (P < .01) by a mean of 7 mm Hg, peak negative dP/dt increased (P < .01), and PER increased, with a mean of 68 +/- 24% (P < .01). LVEDP was similar in stimulated and unstimulated beats and increased (P < .05) in the nonpaced 5-second period. The delay for the best setting ranged from 25 to 125 ms; the stimulus strength was 1.5 to 3 V higher than the clinical setting. At the patient's individual worst setting, SV remained unchanged and PER was higher, with a mean of 30 +/- 25% (P < .05). The worst setting was observed at the 1.5- to 3-V-higher stimulus strength; in six patients, it was at a short delay (4 to 25 ms) and in three patients, at the longest delay (100 to 125 ms). CONCLUSIONS: By the left ventricular conductance catheter and aortic Modelflow methods, improvement in cardiac function by dynamic cardiomyoplasty was demonstrated in this patient group. The synchronization interval, stimulus strength, and stimulus duration appeared to be critical for obtaining optimal improvement.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Influence of tidal volume on left ventricular stroke volume variation measured by pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients.

OBJECTIVE: Real-time measurement of stroke volume variation by arterial pulse contour analysis (SVV) is useful in predicting volume responsiveness and monitoring volume therapy in mechanically ventilated patients. This study investigated the influence of the depth of tidal volume (V(t)) on SVV both during the state of fluid responsiveness and after fluid loading in mechanically ventilated patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective study in a university hospital, adult cardiac surgery intensive care unit. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: 20 hemodynamically stable patients immediately after cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Stepwise fluid loading using colloids until stroke volume index (SVI) did not increase by more than 10%. Before and after fluid loading V(t) was varied (5, 10, and 15 ml/kg body weight) in random order. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Pulse contour SVV was measured before and after volume loading at the respective V(t) values. Thirteen patients responded to fluid loading with an increase in SVI greater than 10%, which confirmed volume responsiveness at baseline measurements. These were included in further analysis. During volume responsiveness SVV at V(t) of 5 ml/kg (7+/-0.7%) and SVV at V(t) of 15 ml/kg (21+/-2.5%) differed significantly from that at V(t) of 10 ml/kg (15+/-2.1%). SVV was correlated significantly with the magnitude of V(t). After volume resuscitation SVV at the respective V(t) was significantly reduced; further, SVV at V(t) of 5 ml/kg(-1) (5.3+/-0.6%) and 15 ml/kg (16.2+/-2.0%) differed significantly from that at V(t) of 10 ml/kg (10.2+/-1.0%). SVV and depth of V(t) were significantly related. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to intravascular volume status SVV is affected by the depth of tidal volume under mechanical ventilation. This influence must be regarded when using SVV for functional preload monitoring.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1982

Comparison of impedance cardiography and echocardiography for measurement of stroke volume.

The relationship between stroke volume (SV) measured simultaneously by impedance cardiography (SVI) and echocardiography (SVE) has been analyzed. Change in stroke volume in 6 healthy volunteers was induced by passive head-up tilting (80 degrees) and by oral administration of the sympathomimetic drug amezinium. A correlation of r = 0.83 (p much less than 0.01) was found between SVI and SVE calculated by the equation: SVE = 16.0 + (0.528 x SVI). Though stroke volume is overestimated by impedance cardiography, the method may be useful for the clinical pharmacologist interested in a simple non-invasive tool to estimate stroke volume and change in it.

Cardiac Output↗