SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Tacrolimus”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2000

Safety and efficacy of 1 year of tacrolimus ointment monotherapy in adults with atopic dermatitis. The European Tacrolimus Ointment Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and efficacy of using 0.1% tacrolimus ointment for long-term treatment of atopic dermatitis. DESIGN: Open-label, noncomparative study with 6 to 12 months of follow-up. SETTINGS: Outpatient departments in 30 study centers in 11 European countries. PATIENTS: We enrolled 316 patients aged 18 years and older with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis, 200 for 6 months and 116 for 12 months; 77.5% of patients completed the study. INTERVENTION: Twice-daily application of 0.1% tacrolimus ointment on all affected skin. Visits were scheduled on day 1; after 1, 2, and 4 weeks of treatment; and monthly thereafter. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Safety assessments included monitoring of adverse events, clinical laboratory values, and tacrolimus blood concentrations. Efficacy end points included a combined score (modified Eczema Area and Severity Index) and an investigator's global assessment. RESULTS: Local irritation, adverse events such as burning sensation (47% of patients), pruritus (24% of patients), and erythema (12% of patients) were common but tended to occur only when initiating treatment. Laboratory values showed no marked changes over time. Systemic absorption was minimal, with the maximum tacrolimus blood concentration being less than 1 ng/mL in 76% of patients. All efficacy end points showed improvement. The mean (SD) modified Eczema Area and Severity Index score was 23.7 (12.6) at day 1, 13.5 (11.3) at week 1, 6.1 (9.2) at month 6, and 6.1 (8.1) at month 12. Marked or excellent improvement or clearance of disease was reported in 54%, 81%, and 86% of patients at week 1, month 6, and month 12, respectively. CONCLUSION: Up to 1 year of tacrolimus ointment use was safe and effective in patients with atopic dermatitis. Arch Dermatol. 2000;136:999-1006

Administration, Topical↗

PubMed2005

Daclizumab induction therapy associated with tacrolimus-MMF has better outcome compared with tacrolimus-MMF alone in pediatric living donor liver transplantation.

AIMS: Immunosuppression therapy for the control of immunologic rejection is a key aspect in liver transplantation. The objective of this study was to evaluate induction therapy with daclizumab (DAC) in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in children. METHODS: We compared 2 different immunosuppression protocols in 30 children undergoing LDLT. The patients were divided into 2 groups: 12 patients received tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil (TAC-MMF), and 18 patients received tacrolimus with MMF and DAC induction therapy at days 0 and 14 after LDLT (DAC-TAC-MMF). Both groups were similar with regard to age, sex, weight, and indication for liver transplantation. The incidence of biopsy-proved rejection episodes, posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), and renal dysfunction were evaluated. Tacrolimus levels at posttransplantation day 14 and at 2 months after transplantation were compared in the 2 groups. RESULTS: Acute rejection episodes were observed in 8 patients in the TAC-MMF group (66%), and none in the DAC-TAC-MMF group (0%; P < .05). Neither PTLD nor renal dysfunction was seen in any patient. Mean Tacrolimus level on posttransplantation day 14 was 10.67 +/- 5.4 ng/mL in the TAC-MMF group and 5.65 +/- 3.6 ng/mL in the DAC-TAC-MMF group (P < .05). After the second month the mean tacrolimus levels were 7.2 +/- 2.9 ng/mL and 6.8 +/- 3.5 ng/mL in the TAC-MMF and DAC-TAC-MMF groups, respectively. (P = NS). CONCLUSION: Induction therapy with DAC is safe and associated with a lower incidence of rejection episodes among children undergoing LDLT.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗

PubMed1999

A randomized, multicenter comparison of tacrolimus and cyclosporine immunosuppressive regimens in cardiac transplantation: decreased hyperlipidemia and hypertension with tacrolimus.

BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus-based immunosuppression seems safe and effective in liver and kidney transplantation. To assess the safety and efficacy of tacrolimus (TAC)-based immunosuppression after cardiac transplantation as well as the relative impact of tacrolimus on immunosuppression-related side effects such as hypertension and hyperlipidemia, we conducted a prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter study of otherwise identical tacrolimus- and cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive regimens in adult patients undergoing cardiac transplantation. METHODS: Eighty-five adult patients (pts) at six United States cardiac transplant centers, undergoing their first cardiac transplant procedure, were prospectively randomized to receive either TAC-based (n = 39) or cyclosporine (CYA)-based (n = 46) immunosuppression. All pts received a triple-drug protocol with 15 pts (18%) receiving peri-operative OKT3 to delay TAC/CYA due to pre-transplant renal dysfunction. Endomyocardial biopsies were performed at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, and 52. The study duration was 12 months. RESULTS: Patients were mostly male (87%) Caucasian (90%) with a mean age of 54 years and primary diagnoses of coronary artery disease (55%) and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (41%). There were no significant demographic differences between groups. Patient and allograft survival were not different in the two groups. The probability and overall incidence of each grade of rejection, whether treated or not, and the types of treatment required did not differ between the groups. At baseline and through 12 months of follow-up, chemistry and hematology values were similar between the groups except serum cholesterol was higher in the CYA group at 3, 6, and 12 months (239 vs 205 mg/dL, 246 vs 191 mg/dL, 212 vs 186 mg/dL, respectively, p < 0.001). Likewise, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides were significantly higher in the CYA group. More CYA patients received therapy for hypercholesterolemia (71% vs 41% at 12 months, p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in renal function, hyperglycemia, hypomagnesemia, or hyperkalemia during the first 12 months. More CYA patients developed new-onset hypertension requiring pharmacologic treatment (71% vs 48%, p = 0.05). The incidence of infection was the same for the two groups (2.6 episodes/pt/12 month follow-up). CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus-based immunosuppression seems effective for rejection prophylaxis during the first year after cardiac transplantation and is associated with less hypertension and hyperlipidemia and no difference in renal function, hyperglycemia or infection incidence when compared to cyclosporine-based immunosuppression.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Quadruple tacrolimus-based induction therapy including azathioprine and ALG does not significantly improve outcome after liver transplantation when compared with standard induction with tacrolimus and steroids: results of a prospective, randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus in combination with prednisolone has been proven to be a safe and effective immunosuppressive induction therapy in solid organ transplantation. However, it remains unclear whether a tacrolimus-based quadruple induction regimen with azathioprine and an antilymphocytic preparation could further improve the results after orthotopic liver transplantation. Therefore, we designed a prospective, randomized study to compare the immunosuppressive efficacy of dual (tacrolimus and prednisolone) and quadruple (tacrolimus, azathioprine, ALG Merieux and prednisolone) induction after liver transplantation. METHODS: After randomization, 120 consecutive patients of primary liver transplants were divided into the dual group (n=59) and the quadruple group (n=61) and followed for a minimum of 3 years. RESULTS: Patient survival at 3 years was 88.2% in the dual versus 94.9% in the quadruple group. Overall 25 patients in each group (41 and 42%, respectively) developed acute rejection. There was no difference in the number and severity of rejections. In each group only four patients required OKT3-therapy, however, although three of four patients in the quadruple group responded to OKT3 and cleared rejection, none of the four patients in the dual group were treated successfully with OKT3 (P<0.02). Rejection in these patients resolved only after additional treatment with mycophenolate mofetil. Adverse events and infections were equally distributed in both groups. Asymptomatic Cytomegalovirus infections were more common in the quadruple group (P<0.02). As of today, only one patient developed posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (dual group). CONCLUSIONS: The data from our single-center study indicate that both tacrolimus-based dual and quadruple immunosuppressive induction regimens yield similar safety and effectiveness after liver transplantation.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

A randomized long-term trial of tacrolimus and sirolimus versus tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (NEORAL) and sirolimus in renal transplantation. I. Drug interactions and rejection at one year.

BACKGROUND: To reduce long-term nephrotoxic calcineurin inhibitor dosage, adjunctive sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was used in a 150-patient, randomized, three-armed trial in cadaveric or human leukocyte antigen non-identical living-donor first renal transplant recipients (n=50/group). METHODS: Group A received tacrolimus and sirolimus. Target tacrolimus trough levels postoperatively were 10, 8, and 6 ng/mL at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year, respectively. Group B received tacrolimus and MMF. Target tacrolimus trough levels were 10 and 8 ng/mL at 1 month and 1 year, with a targeted dose of MMF of 1 g twice daily. Group C received cyclosporine A (CsA) (Neoral, Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) and sirolimus with target CsA trough levels of 225 and 175 ng/mL at 1 month and 1 year. Maintenance sirolimus target trough levels were 8 ng/mL in groups A and C. Each group received daclizumab induction and methylprednisolone maintenance. This first of two companion 1-year reports details demographics, drug-dosing interactions, and rejection. RESULTS: There were no notable differences in group demographics, but a somewhat less favorable course occurred in group C, despite higher bioavailability of sirolimus in group C versus group A (P<0.001). Acute rejection rates were lower in groups A (4%) and B (4%) combined versus group C (14%) (P=0.03). Histopathologic findings were supported by comparing perioperative with 1-year postoperative protocol biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: This 1-year interim analysis indicates that a decreasing dosage of tacrolimus with either adjunctive sirolimus or MMF may optimize future graft survival versus a less favorable outcome using a similar algorithm with CsA and sirolimus.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Pharmacokinetic interaction between levofloxacin and ciclosporin or tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: ciclosporin, tacrolimus and levofloxacin in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Bacterial infections are common complications after organ transplantation. Fluoroquinolones are frequently used for treatment because of their broad spectrum of activity; but some of them, such as ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin, are reported to increase blood concentration of ciclosporin because they are metabolised by the liver through the same enzymatic pathway, the cytochrome P450 system. This study was performed to establish whether levofloxacin, a more recent fluoroquinolone that undergoes limited hepatic metabolism, interferes with metabolism and excretion of either ciclosporin microemulsion or tacrolimus. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic studies were carried out in two groups of renal transplant patients, on either ciclosporin or tacrolimus treatment, before and at the sixth day of treatment with levofloxacin. RESULTS: Levofloxacin significantly increased the mean area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC) and the other pharmacokinetic parameters of ciclosporin and tacrolimus by about 25%. The interference of levofloxacin on the hepatic metabolism of these drugs was demonstrated by the concomitant decrease by 5% of polyclonal ciclosporin concentration, which is the expression of parent drug and its metabolites. Both before and during levofloxacin treatment we observed trough concentrations of monoclonal and polyclonal ciclosporin significantly lower in the evening (C(12)) than in the morning (C(0)); this observation suggests a circadian variation in the metabolism of this drug. However, no difference between C(0) and C(12) was observed with tacrolimus, confirming its more predictable bioavailability. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that levofloxacin partially inhibits the metabolism of both ciclosporin microemulsion and tacrolimus, and therefore close therapeutic monitoring of these two drugs should be recommended during levofloxacin therapy.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

A three-arm study comparing immediate tacrolimus therapy with antithymocyte globulin induction therapy followed by tacrolimus or cyclosporine A in adult renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Induction therapy with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) reduces the incidence of acute rejection after transplantation. A study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of ATG induction on tacrolimus-based and cyclosporine A (CsA)-based therapies compared with immediate tacrolimus triple therapy in kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: In a 6-month, open-label, randomized, prospective study conducted in 30 European centers, 555 renal transplant patients were randomly assigned to tacrolimus triple therapy (Tac triple, n=185), ATG induction with tacrolimus (ATG-Tac, n=186), or ATG induction with CsA microemulsion (ATG-CsA, n=184); all were combined with azathioprine and corticosteroids. The primary endpoint was incidence and time to first acute rejection episode confirmed by biopsy. RESULTS: Patient demographics and clinical parameters at baseline were similar. Patient and graft survival rates were similar in all groups. The incidence of clinically apparent acute rejection was significantly higher (P=0.003) for Tac triple (33.0%) compared with ATG-Tac (22.6%) and the incidence for ATG-Tac was significantly lower (P=0.004) than for ATG-CsA (37.0%). The incidences of acute rejection confirmed by biopsy (primary endpoint) were 25.4%, 15.1%, and 21.2% for Tac triple, ATG-Tac, and ATG-CsA, respectively (Tac triple vs. ATG-Tac, P=0.004). The incidences of corticosteroid-resistant acute rejection were 7.0% (Tac triple), 4.8% (ATG-Tac), and 10.9% (ATG-CsA) (ATG-Tac vs. ATG-CsA, P=0.038). In the ATG groups, the incidences of leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, serum sickness, fever, and cytomegalovirus infection were significantly higher (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Acute rejection was significantly lower in the ATG-Tac group compared with the ATG-CsA and Tac triple groups. Significantly more hematologic and infectious adverse events were observed in both ATG induction groups.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2002

Glucose metabolism in renal transplant recipients on tacrolimus: the effect of steroid withdrawal and tacrolimus trough level reduction.

The relative role of steroids and tacrolimus in the development of glucose metabolic disorders and hyperlipidemia after renal transplantation has not yet been clearly established. Therefore, glucose metabolism was prospectively evaluated by intravenous glucose tolerance test, as was lipid profile, in fifteen white nondiabetic renal transplant recipients three times: before and after steroid withdrawal and after tacrolimus trough level reduction. After withdrawal of 10 mg of prednisolone, insulin resistance decreased (fasting C-peptide, 0.99 to 0.77 nmol/L [P < 0.0009]; fasting insulin, 9.5 to 8.1 mU/L [P = 0.09]; insulin/glucose ratio, 1.85 to 1.45 mU/mmol [P = 0.10]) and lipid levels decreased (total cholesterol, 5.1 to 4.2 mmol/L [P = 0.006]); HDL cholesterol, 1.4 to 1.1 mmol/L [P = 0.01]; LDL cholesterol, 3.0 to 2.5 mmol/L [P = 0.15]; triglycerides, 1.52 to 0.91 mmol/L [P = 0.02]). After tacrolimus trough level reduction from 9.5 to 6.4 ng/ml, pancreatic beta-cell secretion capacity improved (C-peptide secretion increased from 49.0 to 66.6 nmol x min/L [P = 0.04] and insulin secretion increased from 1134 to 1403 mU x min/L [P = 0.06]). HbA1c improved also, from 5.9 to 5.3% (P = 0.002). Lipids did not change. In conclusion, steroid withdrawal resulted in a decrease in insulin resistance and a reduction in lipids, and tacrolimus trough level reduction resulted in an improved pancreatic beta-cell secretion capacity. Therefore, these therapeutic measurements may contribute to the reduction of the cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in renal transplant recipients.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Evaluation of renal function in liver transplant recipients receiving daclizumab (Zenapax), mycophenolate mofetil, and a delayed, low-dose tacrolimus regimen vs. a standard-dose tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil regimen: a multicenter randomized clinical trial.

Posttransplant chronic renal failure, secondary to calcineurin inhibitor agents, is emerging as a major problem in liver transplantation. We report a randomized clinical trial comparing daclizumab, delayed low-dose tacrolimus (target trough level 4-8 ng/mL, starting day 4-6), Investigational Arm (n = 72), to standard tacrolimus induction/maintenance dosing, Standard Arm (n = 76), with mycophenolate mofetil and tapering corticosteroids in both study arms. The end-points were renal function indicated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD). There was no significant difference in patient survival (86.6% Investigational Arm vs. 92.9% Standard Arm; P = 0.21) or acute rejection (23.2% vs. 27.7%, respectively; P = 0.68). Statistically significant differences in median glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were found in favor of the Investigational Arm. With the CG equation, the GFR at the end of the first week was 110.7 vs. 89.6 mL/min (P = 0.019) without significant differences thereafter. With the MDRD, statistically significant differences extended to the first posttransplant month (86.8 vs. 70.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2); P < 0.001) with and was seen at month 6 (75.4 vs. 69.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2); P = 0.038). In conclusion, delayed low-dose tacrolimus, in combination with daclizumab and mycophenolate mofetil, preserves early renal function post-liver transplantation without the cost of increased acute rejection.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

PubMed1998

Tacrolimus and cyclosporine efficacy in high-risk kidney transplantation. European Multicentre Tacrolimus (FK506) Renal Study Group.

The efficacy and safety of tacrolimus- and cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive regimens were compared in a prospectively defined subgroup of kidney transplant recipients from the European, open, multicentre, 2:1 randomised, parallel group study. Patients were stratified as high risk for immunological events if they had a panel-reactive antibodies grade greater than 80% and/or a previous transplant functional for less than 1 year. The primary efficacy variables evaluated were the incidence of acute rejection, steroid usage and patient and graft survival. Safety was assessed based on adverse events and laboratory evaluations. At 1 year, the tacrolimus group (n = 22) had a lower incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (31.8%) and a higher graft survival (86.0%) than the 11 patients in the cyclosporine group (54.5% and 72.0%, respectively). The frequencies of adverse events were similar between the two groups. The tacrolimus regimen appears more beneficial for high risk patients than cyclosporine.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporine for a non-dose-dependent tacrolimus-induced toxicity, a pediatric kidney transplant recipient case report.

Tacrolimus-induced toxicity is considered a dose-related side effect largely due to a direct action of this potent calcineurin inhibitor on its targets including the kidney and the pancreas. This paper describes a case of tacrolimus systemic toxicity that appeared in a pediatric kidney transplant recipient who received a low drug dose. The kidney biopsy was a crucial aid toward the correct diagnosis, which reversed upon conversion to cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. A review of the literature suggests a chance of systemic toxicity even when the patient is maintained on therapeutic levels of tacrolimus. Because idiosyncratic reactions to the drug have not yet been postulated, we conclude that this suspicion may be addressed by a safe conversion to cyclosporine in pediatric patients.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1996

Evaluation of the Pro-Trac tacrolimus monoclonal whole-blood enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for monitoring of tacrolimus levels in patients after kidney, heart, and liver transplantation.

In a prospective study, we evaluated a novel enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Pro-Trac) for determining tacrolimus (FK 506) concentrations in whole blood. Results obtained by the ELISA were compared with those obtained either by microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA) or by high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS). The lower limit of quantitation of the ELISA was 0.5 microgram/L. The within-series coefficient of variation (CV) was < 11%. For spiked blood samples containing different concentrations of tacrolimus, interassay CV was 23.6% at 2.5 micrograms/L; however, at 15 and 60 micrograms/L, interassay CV was 44.9 and 50.8%, respectively. In crossover studies including blood samples from patients after liver, heart, or kidney transplantation, ELISA results correlated with those of the HPLC-MS (r = 0.73) as well as with those generated by MEIA (r = 0.82). The ELISA and MEIA showed 52.3 and 56.2% cross-reactivity with 15-O-demethyltacrolimus, respectively, but only 5.0 and 5.4% cross-reactivity with 13-O-demethyltacrolimus. We conclude that if assay precision in the upper range is improved, the Pro-Trac ELISA might be a valuable alternative to the MEIA for therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗

PubMed2005

Tacrolimus pharmacogenetics: the CYP3A5*1 allele predicts low dose-normalized tacrolimus blood concentrations in whites and South Asians.

Previously, we demonstrated that the dose-normalized tacrolimus blood concentration after renal transplantation was associated with a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the CYP3AP1 gene, probably through linkage with an SNP in the CYP3A5 gene. Individuals with at least one CYP3A5*1 allele synthesize CYP3A5 and CYP3A5*3/*3 homozygotes do not. We now present results with direct typing of the CYP3A5 genotype for this group of 180 kidney-only transplant recipients from a single center. South Asian and white patients with at least one CYP3A5*1 allele achieved twofold lower dose-normalized tacrolimus blood concentrations compared with CYP3A5*3/*3 homozygotes, confirming our previous findings for the CYP3AP1 SNP. There was a significant delay in achieving target blood concentrations in those with at least one CYP3A5*1 allele. Determination of the CYP3A5*1/*3 genotype could be used to predict the tacrolimus dose requirement and, given incomplete linkage, would be better than determination of the CYP3AP1 genotype.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

A prospective randomized trial comparing tacrolimus and steroids with tacrolimus monotherapy in liver transplantation: the impact on recurrence of hepatitis C.

The aim of this prospective randomized trial was to study the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus monotherapy (TACRO) and compare it with our standard treatment of tacrolimus plus steroids (TACRO + ST) after liver transplant (LT). Furthermore, the impact of steroid-free immunosuppression on outcome of hepatitis C virus (HCV) was analysed. Between 1998 and 2000, 60 patients (mean age: 57 years) were included in the study and randomized to receive TACRO (n = 28) or TACRO + ST (n = 32). Indication for LT was postnecrotic cirrhosis in all cases (58.3% were HCV-positive). Mean follow-up was 44 months. Survival, incidence of rejection, infection and side-effects were compared between the two groups. In patients with HCV infection, incidence and severity of acute hepatitis C, long-term outcome of recurrent hepatitis C and survival were studied in an intention-to-treat analysis or in the real group analysis (real-TACRO versus real-TACRO + ST). Patient survival at 1, 3 and 5 years, tacrolimus pharmacokinetics, incidence of rejection infections and side-effects were similar. In patients with HCV, the incidence and severity of graft hepatitis C tended to be lower in TACRO (47%) compared with TACRO + ST (67%) (P = NS), and also in real-TACRO (42%) compared with real-TACRO + ST (61%) (P = NS). A poor outcome considered as evolution to cirrhosis at 3 years was observed in one (9%) living patient in real-TACRO and nine (45%) in real-TACRO + ST (P = 0.04). Patient survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 92%, 92% and 73% for real-TACRO and 78%, 61% and 51% for real TACRO + ST (P = 0.07). Steroid-free immunosuppression appears to be safe and efficacious. The main advantage of this regimen could be in HCV patients, as recurrence of hepatitis in the graft was less severe in the group of patients in whom steroids could be avoided completely.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Sirolimus in combination with tacrolimus is associated with worse renal allograft survival compared to mycophenolate mofetil combined with tacrolimus.

Cyclosporine (CsA) nephrotoxicity is enhanced by sirolimus (SRL). Tacrolimus is perceived to be less nephrotoxic than CsA, and therefore, CsA has been largely replaced by tacrolimus (TAC) when calcineurin inhibitors are used with SRL. We analyzed 44 915 adult renal transplants in the Scientific Renal Transplant Registry (SRTR) from 2000 to 2004. Three thousand five hundred twenty-four (7.8%) patients received a baseline immunosuppressive regimen of TAC/SRL, with an inferior overall (log-rank p<0.001) and death-censored graft survival (p<0.001) as compared to TAC/MMF (N=27 007). This effect was confirmed in multivariate Cox models; the adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) for overall graft loss with TAC/SRL was 1.47 (95% CI=1.32, 1.63) and for CsA/SRL 1.38 (95% CI=1.20, 1.59) relative to TAC/MMF. These effects were most apparent in high-risk transplants. Six-month acute rejection rates were low (11.5-12.6%) and not different between groups. In summary, national data indicate that TAC/SRL as compared to TAC/MMF is associated with significantly worse renal allograft survival in all subgroups of patients and, in particular, higher-risk transplants. These results have to be interpreted in the context of the inherent limitations of any retrospective database analysis and evaluated in context with data from prospective clinical trials.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2000

Tacrolimus is highly effective in both dual and triple therapy regimens following renal transplantation. Spanish and Italian Tacrolimus Study Group.

This open, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group study evaluated the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus-based dual and triple therapy regimens. For this 3-month study (with 12-month follow up), 491 adult renal transplant patients were randomized and received either dual therapy (tacrolimus/corticosteroids; 246 patients) or triple therapy (tacrolimus/corticosteroids/azathioprine; 245 patients). Patient survival rates at months 3 and 12 were 99.2 (dual) vs 99.6% (triple) and 97.8 vs 98.7%, respectively. Graft survival rates at months 3 and 12 were 94.1 (dual) vs 95.4% (triple) and 92.8 vs 93.3%, respectively. After 3 months, the incidences of treated acute rejection were 28.8 (dual) and 29.7% (triple); and 7.6 (dual) and 5.4% (triple) for corticosteroid-resistant acute rejections. Between months 4 and 12, three new first rejections were reported, (dual: 2, triple: 1). For leukopenia (1.3 vs 11.7%; P < 0.001) and anemia (14.8 vs 23.0%, P = 0.026), significantly higher incidences were reported in the triple therapy group. The incidence of de novo insulin-dependent diabetes was 5.6 (dual) and 4.0% (triple) at month 3. In terms of efficacy, no difference between the treatment groups was observed.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2005

Withdrawal of steroids: a randomized prospective study of prednisone and tacrolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients with autoimmune hepatitis.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the success of steroid (PRED) withdrawal due to replacement by mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Thirty patients with AIH > 12 months after OLT randomized to receive either PRED and tacrolimus (TAC) or MMF and TAC were followed for 24 months. Withdrawal of steroids showed no difference regarding graft and patient survival. Also we demonstrated significantly lower glucose levels with lower HbA1c and a reduced need for insulin as well as a significantly lower serum cholesterol in the MMF group. Patients without steroids showed a lower incidence of osteopenia. Maintenance therapy in OLT patients with AIH may be performed safely using MMF instead of prednisone.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Ten years of treatment with tacrolimus is related to an excellent renal function, allowing monotherapy in a large proportion of cases: unicentric results of the tacrolimus versus cyclosporine A European Multicentric Study in kidney transplant patients.

Tacrolimus (Tac) is the most frequently used base inmunosuppressant for transplantation in Spain and the United States. However, long-term data on its use in renal transplant patients are lacking. The aim of this study was to analyze the 10-year outcome of patients from our institution treated with Tac or cyclosporine (CsA) who were included in the European Multicenter Study of kidney transplantation (1993 to 1994). This trial compared the efficacy and safety of steroids + Tac + azathioprine versus steroids + CsA + azathioprine at 1 year, showing a significantly lower acute rejection rate in Tac patients, with no differences in graft or patient survival. In our long-term analysis, we included patients with a functioning graft after the first year: 15 patients on Tac and 11 on CsA. In the "intent-to-treat" (ITT) analysis, patient survival was 14/15 (93%) versus 9/11 (82%) and death noncensored graft survival was 10/15 (67%) versus 8/11 (73%) in Tac and CsA, respectively. Analyzing patients "into treatment" (TT), death/noncensored graft survival was 11/16 (69%) versus 6/9 (67%), respectively. Serum creatinine tended to be lower in Tac group (ITT 1.26 +/- 0.42 vs 1.63 +/- 1.16 mg/dL, P = NS; TT 1.23 +/- 0.4 vs 1.86 +/- 1.28 mg/dL, P = NS). However, in the TT analysis, Tac patients exhibited a significantly better creatinine clearance (89.3 +/- 40 vs 46.8 +/- 21 mL/min, P = .037) and lower systolic blood pressure (125 +/- 5 vs 140 +/- 12 mm Hg, P = .007) at 10 years. No other significant differences were observed in blood pressure, lipid profile, or glucose metabolism. Outstandingly, Tac monotherapy was the most frequently used regimen after 10 years: ITT 6/9 (67%) versus 1/8 (12.5%), P = .05, TT 7/10 (70%) versus 0/6 (0%), P = .011. Patients under Tac monotherapy exhibited an excellent graft function (serum creatinine 1.08 +/- 0.14 mg/dL) and negative proteinuria, with Tac trough levels of 7.9 +/- 1.3 ng/mL. In summary, our results suggest that Tac-based immunosuppression provides an excellent kidney function 10 years after transplantation and allows monotherapy in a high percentage of kidney transplant patients.

Adult↗