PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Translational repression”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Translational repression and specific RNA binding by the coat protein of the Pseudomonas phage PP7.

PP7 is a single-strand RNA bacteriophage of Pseudomonas aeroginosa and a distant relative to coliphages like MS2 and Qbeta. Here we show that PP7 coat protein is a specific RNA-binding protein, capable of repressing the translation of sequences fused to the translation initiation region of PP7 replicase. Its RNA binding activity is specific since it represses the translational operator of PP7, but does not repress the operators of the MS2 or Qbeta phages. Conditions for the purification of coat protein and for the reconstitution of its RNA binding activity from disaggregated virus-like particles were established. Its dissociation constant for PP7 operator RNA in vitro was determined to be about 1 nm. Using a genetic system in which coat protein represses translation of a replicase-beta-galactosidase fusion protein, amino acid residues important for binding of PP7 RNA were identified.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Translation repression by antisense sequences.

Antisense sequences that hybridize to messenger RNA can inhibit target gene expression in a variety of ways. The best-known antisense mechanisms trigger messenger RNA (mRNA) degradation; however, translation repression by ribosome interference is a common natural antisense mechanism. In bacteria, there are fascinating examples of cis-encoded and trans-encoded antisense sequences that reversibly repress translation. In eukaryotes, microRNAs that bind 3'UTR target sequences also repress translation, although the mechanism is unclear. An important feature of translation repression is that the mRNA can remain intact during periods of repression, and rapid expression switching can occur in response to cellular and environmental signals. Recent genome analyses indicate many new short noncoding RNAs with predicted antisense activities. Therefore, translation repression by antisense sequences is likely to be a common and important form of posttranscriptional gene control, and such natural mechanisms provide a basis for the development of synthetic antisense gene control in research and drug development.

Animals↗

Sex-lethal is a target of Bruno-mediated translational repression in promoting the differentiation of stem cell progeny during Drosophila oogenesis.

The RNA Recognition Motif (RRM) type RNA binding protein Bruno is required for the differentiation of cystoblasts, the committed daughters of germline stem cells in the Drosophila ovary. To understand how Bruno controls cystoblast differentiation, we used a bioinformatics approach to identify potential mRNA targets of Bruno. One such target is the Sex-lethal (Sxl) transcript MS11, which contains four Bruno Response Elements (BREs) in its 3' untranslated region. Electrophoresis mobility shift assays demonstrated that Bruno specifically binds to the BREs of Sxl MS11 mRNA. Tagged transgenic Sxl MS11 cDNA constructs were used to show that Bruno represses the translation of the Sxl MS11 mRNA via the BRE-containing region in the 3'UTR. The lack of either Bruno or the BRE-containing region leads to overexpression of SXL, which in turn causes defects in cystoblast differentiation similar to the Bruno mutant phenotype. Therefore, Sxl MS11 represents a novel target of Bruno-mediated translational repression required for cystoblast differentiation.

3' Untranslated Regions↗

Translational repression mechanisms in prokaryotes.

Translational repression results from a complex choreography of macromolecular interactions interfering with the formation of translational initiation complexes. The relationship between the rate and extent of formation of these interactions to form repressed mRNA complexes determines the extent of repression. A novel analysis of repression mechanisms is presented here and it indicates that the reversibility of repressed complex formation influences the steady state balance of the distribution of translationally active and inactive complexes and therefore has an impact on the efficiency of repression. Reviewed here is evidence for three distinct translational repression mechanisms, regulating expression of the transcription factor sigma32, threonine tRNA synthetase and ribosomal proteins on the alpha operon in Escherichia coli. Efficient regulation of expression in these systems makes use of specific mRNA structures in quite different ways.

Escherichia coli↗

Evidence for translational repression of the SOCS-1 major open reading frame by an upstream open reading frame.

The suppressor of cytokine signalling 1 protein (SOCS-1) belongs to a novel family of cytokine inducible factors which function as inhibitors of the JAK/STAT pathway. While SOCS-1 previously has been described as a single-exon gene, here we present evidence for an additional 5' exon, separated by a 509 bp intron from exon 2. Exon 1 and part of exon 2 contain an open reading frame of 115 nt, ending one nucleotide upstream of the major reading frame. Using SOCS-1-promoter/luciferase constructs, we investigated which sequences are involved in the regulation of SOCS-1 expression. Serial promoter deletion clones indicate the localization and functionality of SP1, interferon-stimulated responsive elements (ISRE), and interferon-gamma-activated sites (GAS) promoter elements in the SOCS-1 5' flanking region. We present evidence that the upstream open reading frame (uORF) represses the translation of the downstream major open reading frame (mORF). Mutating the start codon of the uORF relieves this repression. Our data indicate that expression of the SOCS-1 protein is repressed on translational level by a mechanism, which bears similarities to that postulated for genes like retinoic acid receptor beta2 (RARbeta2), S-adenosylmethionine-decarboxylase (AdoMetDC), Bcl-2, and others.

5' Untranslated Regions↗

EDEN-dependent translational repression of maternal mRNAs is conserved between Xenopus and Drosophila.

Translational control is a key level in regulating gene expression in oocytes and eggs because many mRNAs are synthesized and stored during oogenesis for latter use at various stages of oocyte maturation and embryonic development. Understanding the molecular mechanisms that underlie this translational control is therefore crucial. Another important issue is the evolutionary conservation of these mechanisms--in other words the determination of their universal and specific aspects. We report here a comparative analysis of a translational repression mechanism that depends on the EDEN (embryo deadenylation element) element. This small cis-acting element, localized in the 3' untranslated region of c-mos and Eg mRNAs, was shown to be involved in a deadenylation process. We demonstrate here that in Xenopus embryos, mRNAs that contain an EDEN are translationally repressed. Next, transgenic flies were used to study the effect of the EDEN motif on translation in Drosophila oocytes. We show that this element also causes the translational repression of a reporter gene in Drosophila demonstrating that the EDEN-dependent translational repression is functionally conserved between Xenopus and Drosophila.

3' Untranslated Regions↗

Phage HK022 Nun protein represses translation of phage lambda N (transcription termination/translation repression).

The N-terminal arginine-rich motif of phage HK022 Nun protein binds to NUT sequences in phage lambda nascent transcripts and induces transcription termination. Interactions between the Nun C terminus and RNA polymerase as well as the DNA template are required for termination. We have isolated Nun C-terminal point and deletion mutants that are unable to block transcription. The mutants bind NUT RNA and inhibit translation of the lambda N gene. Thus HK022 excludes lambda both by terminating transcription on the phage chromosome and by preventing translation of the essential lambda N gene. Like N autoregulation, translation repression by Nun requires host RNaseIII deficiency (rnc) or a mutation in the RNaseIII processing site (rIII) located between NUTL and the beginning of the N coding sequence. Our data support the idea that Nun bound at NUTL causes steric interference with ribosome attachment to the nearby N coding sequence. Two models, Nun acting alone or in complex with host proteins, are discussed.

Bacteriophage lambda↗

RAP55, a cytoplasmic mRNP component, represses translation in Xenopus oocytes.

mRNAs in eukaryotic cells are presumed to always associate with a set of proteins to form mRNPs. In Xenopus oocytes, a large pool of maternal mRNAs is masked from the translational apparatus as storage mRNPs. Here we identified Xenopus RAP55 (xRAP55) as a component of RNPs that associate with FRGY2, the principal component of maternal mRNPs. RAP55 is a member of the Scd6 or Lsm14 family. RAP55 localized to cytoplasmic foci in Xenopus oocytes and the processing bodies (P-bodies) in cultured human cells: in the latter cells, RAP55 is an essential constituent of the P-bodies. We isolated xRAP55-containing complexes from Xenopus oocytes and identified xRAP55-associated proteins, including a DEAD-box protein, Xp54, and a protein arginine methyltransferase, PRMT1. Recombinant xRAP55 repressed translation, together with Xp54, in an in vitro translation system. In addition, xRAP55 repressed translation in oocytes when tethered with a reporter mRNA. Domain analyses revealed that the N-terminal region of RAP55, including the Lsm domain, is important for the localization to P-bodies and translational repression. Taken together, our results suggest that xRAP55 is involved in translational repression of mRNA as a component of storage mRNPs.

Animals↗

Translational repression dependent on the interaction of the Xenopus Y-box protein FRGY2 with mRNA. Role of the cold shock domain, tail domain, and selective RNA sequence recognition.

We have examined the determinants of the translational repression of mRNA by the Xenopus oocyte-specific Y-box protein FRGY2 using in vitro and in vivo assays. In vitro reconstitution of messenger ribonucleoprotein (mRNP) complexes demonstrates that the sequence-specific RNA-binding cold shock domain is not required for translational repression, whereas the RNA-binding C-terminal tail domain is essential. However, microinjection of reconstituted mRNPs into Xenopus oocytes demonstrates that although translational repression occurs in the absence of consensus RNA binding sequences for FRGY2, the presence of FRGY2 recognition elements within mRNA potentiates translational repression. Analysis of the in vivo assembly of mRNP shows that the cold shock domain alone is not stably incorporated into mRNP, whereas the C-terminal tail domain is sufficient for stable incorporation. We suggest that translational repression of mRNA by FRGY2 is favored by sequence-selective recognition of RNA sequences by the cold shock domain. However, translational repression in vitro and the assembly of mRNP in vivo requires the relatively nonspecific interaction of the C-terminal tail domain with mRNA. Thus two distinct domains of FRGY2 are likely to contribute to translational control.

Animals↗

Translational repression by MSY4 inhibits spermatid differentiation in mice.

In developing male germ cells, newly synthesized protamine mRNAs are stored for up to 7 days before translational activation. Translational repression of protamine 1 (Prm1) mRNA requires sequences present in its 3' untranslated region (UTR) and substantial evidence suggests a role for the murine Y-box protein MSY4 in this process. To determine if MSY4 can mediate translational repression in vivo, we generated transgenic mice in which the temporal window of MSY4 expression was extended during spermatogenesis. Expression of MSY4 disrupted the normal completion of spermatogenesis and caused dominant sterility. Immunocytochemical analysis of several markers, including the protamines, indicated that MSY4 prevented normal activation of translation. mRNAs whose translation was inhibited contained at least one MSY4 RNA recognition site, suggesting sequence-dependent translational repression. Altered translational activation resulted in defective processing of protamine 2 and severe defects in sperm morphogenesis. These results suggest that MSY4 plays an active role in translational repression of several mRNAs in differentiating spermatids.

3' Untranslated Regions↗

Widespread release of translational repression across Plasmodium's host-to-vector transmission event.

Malaria parasites must respond quickly to environmental changes, including during their transmission between mammalian and mosquito hosts. Therefore, female gametocytes proactively produce and translationally repress mRNAs that encode essential proteins that the zygote requires to establish a new infection. While the release of translational repression of individual mRNAs has been documented, the details of the global release of translational repression have not. Moreover, changes in the spatial arrangement and composition of the DOZI/CITH/ALBA complex that contribute to translational control are also not known. Therefore, we have conducted the first quantitative, comparative transcriptomics and DIA-MS proteomics of Plasmodium parasites across the host-to-vector transmission event to document the global release of translational repression. Using female gametocytes and zygotes of P. yoelii, we found that ~200 transcripts are released for translation soon after fertilization, including those encoding essential functions. Moreover, we identified that many transcripts remain repressed beyond this point. TurboID-based proximity proteomics of the DOZI/CITH/ALBA regulatory complex revealed substantial spatial and/or compositional changes across this transmission event, which are consistent with recent, paradigm-shifting models of translational control. Together, these data provide a model for the essential translational control mechanisms that promote Plasmodium's efficient transmission from mammalian host to mosquito vector.

Animals↗

Sbp1p affects translational repression and decapping in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

The relationship between translation and mRNA turnover is critical to the regulation of gene expression. One major pathway for mRNA turnover occurs by deadenylation, which leads to decapping and subsequent 5'-to-3' degradation of the body of the mRNA. Prior to mRNA decapping, a transcript exits translation and enters P bodies to become a potential decapping substrate. To understand the transition from translation to decapping, it is important to identify the factors involved in this process. In this work, we identify Sbp1p (formerly known as Ssb1p), an abundant RNA binding protein, as a high-copy-number suppressor of a conditional allele in the decapping enzyme. Sbp1p overexpression restores normal decay rates in decapping-defective strains and increases P-body size and number. In addition, Sbp1p promotes translational repression of mRNA during glucose deprivation. Moreover, P-body formation is reduced in strains lacking Sbp1p. Sbp1p acts in conjunction with Dhh1p, as it is required for translational repression and P-body formation in pat1Delta strains under these conditions. These results identify Sbp1p as a new protein that functions in the transition of mRNAs from translation to an mRNP complex destined for decapping.

Alleles↗

Acetic acid-induced translational repression involves eIF2B body formation and Ded1 sequestration into stress granules in yeast.

Elucidating the physiological impact of acetic acid stress and the corresponding yeast responses is essential for advancing fundamental biology and improving industrial alcoholic fermentation. Despite numerous genome-wide studies, information on the effects of acetic acid stress on yeast translational regulation remains limited. We found that a sublethal concentration of acetic acid (35 mM, 0.2% v/v) causes translational repression, accompanied by the formation of eIF2B bodies and the phosphorylation of eIF2α, both of which are involved in the regulation of translation initiation. Acetic acid also caused the sequestration of Ded1, a DEAD-box RNA helicase crucial for translation initiation, into stress granules. Removal of acetic acid restored translational activity and the proper localization of eIF2B and Ded1, indicating the reversibility of acetic acid-induced translational repression. Furthermore, when yeast cells were pretreated with 0.05% acetic acid, translational repression under subsequent 0.2% acetic acid stress was attenuated in wild-type cells but not in hrk1Δ cells. This indicates that Hrk1, a Pma1 activator, is required to sufficiently enhance tolerance to acetic acid-induced translational repression. These findings provide novel insights into the physiological effects of acetic acid stress on translational activity and translation-related factors in yeast cells.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae↗

Translational repression in bacteriophage f1: characterization of the gene V protein target on the gene II mRNA.

Previous studies have shown that the single-stranded DNA binding protein of bacteriophage f1 (gene V protein) represses the translation of the mRNA of the phage-encoded replication protein (gene II protein). We have characterized phage mutations in the repressor and in its target. Using a gene II-lacZ translational fusion, we have defined a 16-nucleotide-long region in the gene II mRNA sequence that is required in vivo for repression by the gene V protein. We have shown that in vitro the binding affinity of the gene V protein is at least 10-fold higher to an RNA carrying this sequence than to an RNA lacking it. We propose that this sequence constitutes the gene II mRNA operator.

Base Sequence↗

Translation repression in human cells by microRNA-induced gene silencing requires RCK/p54.

RNA interference is triggered by double-stranded RNA that is processed into small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) by Dicer enzyme. Endogenously, RNA interference triggers are created from small noncoding RNAs called microRNAs (miRNAs). RNA-induced silencing complexes (RISC) in human cells can be programmed by exogenously introduced siRNA or endogenously expressed miRNA. siRNA-programmed RISC (siRISC) silences expression by cleaving a perfectly complementary target mRNA, whereas miRNA-induced silencing complexes (miRISC) inhibits translation by binding imperfectly matched sequences in the 3' UTR of target mRNA. Both RISCs contain Argonaute2 (Ago2), which catalyzes target mRNA cleavage by siRISC and localizes to cytoplasmic mRNA processing bodies (P-bodies). Here, we show that RCK/p54, a DEAD box helicase, interacts with argonaute proteins, Ago1 and Ago2, in affinity-purified active siRISC or miRISC from human cells; directly interacts with Ago1 and Ago2 in vivo, facilitates formation of P-bodies, and is a general repressor of translation. Disrupting P-bodies by depleting Lsm1 did not affect RCK/p54 interactions with argonaute proteins and its function in miRNA-mediated translation repression. Depletion of RCK/p54 disrupted P-bodies and dispersed Ago2 throughout the cytoplasm but did not significantly affect siRNA-mediated RNA functions of RISC. Depleting RCK/p54 released general, miRNA-induced, and let-7-mediated translational repression. Therefore, we propose that translation repression is mediated by miRISC via RCK/p54 and its specificity is dictated by the miRNA sequence binding multiple copies of miRISC to complementary 3' UTR sites in the target mRNA. These studies also suggest that translation suppression by miRISC does not require P-body structures, and location of miRISC to P-bodies is the consequence of translation repression.

3' Untranslated Regions↗

Regulation of initiation factors during translational repression caused by serum depletion. Abundance, synthesis, and turnover rates.

During growth in unreplenished medium, the fraction of active, polysomal ribosomes progressively decreases about 3-fold from 80-90% to only 20-40% due to a reduced rate of initiation. To assess whether the abundance of initiation factors could be involved in this repression of translational activity. HeLa cell cytoplasmic lysates were resolved by two-dimensional isoelectric focusing/sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and spots corresponding to the initiation factor proteins were quantitated. The relative abundance of most of the initiation factor proteins only decreases by 10-40% and roughly parallels that of the ribosomes. Measurement of the rates of synthesis and turnover of the initiation factor proteins establishes that during periods of active growth, synthesis and degradation occur coordinately with total cell protein. As growth rate decreases, the synthesis of some initiation factor proteins, particularly eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF)-3 subunits, becomes depressed. Serum stimulation of serum-depleted cells recruits most inactive ribosomes and mRNAs into polysomes, but most initiation factor mRNAs are not selectively recruited. The principal exceptions are eIF-3p24 which exhibits 4-5 fold enhanced synthesis and eIF-3p44 and eIF-4A whose syntheses are moderately stimulated.

Blood↗

A new translational repression element and unusual transcriptional control regulate expression of don juan during Drosophila spermatogenesis.

The Drosophila don juan (dj) gene encodes a basic protein that is expressed solely in the male germline and shows structural similarities to the linker histone H1. Don Juan is located in two different subcellular structures: in the nucleus during the phase of chromatin condensation and later in the mitochondrial derivatives starting with spermatid individualization. The don juan gene is transcribed in primary spermatocytes under the control of 23 bp upstream in combination with downstream sequences. During meiotic stages and in early spermatid stages don juan mRNA is translationally repressed for several days. Analysis of male sterile mutants which fail to undergo meiosis shows that release of dj mRNA from translational repression is independent of meiosis. In gel retardation assays 60 nucleotides at the end of the dj leader form four major complexes with proteins that were extracted from testes but not with protein extracts from ovaries. Transformation studies prove that in vivo 35 bp within that region of the dj mRNA is essential to confer translational repression. UV cross-linking studies show that a 62 kDa protein specifically binds to the same region within the 5' untranslated region. The dj translational repression element, TRE, is distinct from the translational control element, TCE, described earlier for all members of the Mst(3)CGP gene family. Moreover, expression studies in several male sterile mutants reveal that don juan mRNA is translated in earlier developmental stages during sperm morphogenesis than the Mst(3)CGP mRNAs. This proves that translational activation of dormant mRNAs in spermatogenesis occurs at different time-points which are characteristic for each gene, an essential feature for coordinated sperm morphogenesis.

5' Untranslated Regions↗

Separate elements in the 3' untranslated region of the mouse protamine 1 mRNA regulate translational repression and activation during murine spermatogenesis.

The mouse protamine mRNAs, Prm-1 and Prm-2, are translationally repressed for several days during male germ cell differentiation. The translational delay of mouse Prm-1 mRNA has previously been shown to be dependent upon cis-acting elements that reside in the last 62 nucleotides of the Prm-1 3' untranslated region (3' UTR). We have previously identified a 48/50-kDa protein that binds the 3' UTRs of both Prm-1 and Prm-2 mRNAs in a sequence-specific manner, is present in cytoplasmic fractions of postmeiotic round spermatids where the protamine mRNAs are translationally silent, and is markedly reduced in elongated spermatids where the protamine mRNAs become activated for translation. Surprisingly, the binding site for this activity maps to a region of the Prm-1 3' UTR not contained within the functional 62 nucleotides described above. In this report we show that the binding site for the 48/50-kDa protein can also delay translation of a reporter RNA in vivo, suggesting that the 48/50-kDa protein can repress the translation of Prm-1 mRNA during murine spermatogenesis. This observation proves that two separate regions of the Prm-1 3' UTR are sufficient to repress Prm-1 translation. In addition, immunocytochemistry and polysome analysis have revealed that this transgenic reporter mRNA fails to undergo proper translational activation. These results suggest that an additional region of the Prm-1 3' UTR is required for proper translational activation and that Prm-1 translational repression elements can be separated from those involved in translational activation.

Animals↗