[Urodynamic studies on detrusor hyperreflexia. I. An urodynamic analysis of clinical pictures (author's transl)].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the overall tolerability of urodynamic studies used in the assessment of men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), by assessing the objective and subjective morbidity experienced during and after urodynamic studies, and to assess the voiding complaints caused by the combination of urodynamic studies with flexible cysto-urethroscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 103 men with LUTS, who underwent a urodynamic study combined with flexible cysto-urethroscopy, completed a questionnaire designed to assess objective and subjective symptoms and degree of bother, with emphasis on the urodynamic study. In addition, a urine specimen was analysed and cultured. In all, 78 patients who underwent a second urodynamic study completed the questionnaire twice. RESULTS: The results of the first questionnaire showed that more than half of the patients experienced some urge after the urodynamic study and cysto-urethroscopy (56%); 35% of the patients experienced little and 19% experienced severe voiding discomfort after the combined investigations, compared with 24% and 5%, respectively, after a urodynamic study alone. Three patients (3%) had a symptomatic urinary tract infection. Haematuria, increased voiding frequency and increased nocturia occurred occasionally. Most of the patients found the urodynamic study less bothersome than they had expected (64%) and only 9% found it worse than expected. The overall degree of discomfort, experienced during and after the urodynamic study combined with cysto-urethroscopy, was low, and after a second urodynamic study was even lower. CONCLUSION: In contrast with earlier results, this clinic-based urodynamic investigation was associated with a low proportion of urinary tract infection, and low objective and subjective morbidity. The combination of a urodynamic study with a flexible cysto-urethroscopy does not cause significant additional voiding complaints. Most patients find urodynamic studies tolerable and not very bothersome.
PURPOSE: We assess night and day function of the neuropathic bladder in children with neurogenic vesical dysfunction by overnight urodynamic monitoring and conventional static cystometrogram. Overnight urodynamics as a diagnostic tool was evaluated and its reproducibility analyzed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 18 months 3 boys and 3 girls 6 to 14 years old (mean age plus or minus standard deviation 10.3 +/- 3.3) were studied prospectively. Each child was evaluated on 4 separate occasions with 2-daytime cystometrograms at a standard fill rate of 10 ml. per minute and 2 overnight urodynamic studies for 8 hours using a Urolog Recorder. All 6 children were interviewed regarding the acceptability, repeatability and compliance to overnight urodynamics. RESULTS: Bladder capacity was not significantly different during each episode for either of the 2 tests. Mean bladder pressures in 2 children showed stable detrusor activity on cystometry (2 +/- 1.4 cm. H2O) and overnight urodynamics (0.4 +/- 0.5, r = 0.9). Detrusor compliance was not impaired in these 2 children. Four patients had frank detrusor instability with a mean bladder pressure of 50.6 +/- 17.4 cm. H2O on cystometry versus 35.9 +/- 5.2 on overnight urodynamics (r = 0.9). Bladder compliance was severely impaired in these 4 patients. Compliance at potential bladder capacity for patient age was 6.6 +/- 2.1 ml./cm. H2O for cystometry versus 9.2 +/- 3.4 for overnight urodynamics (p = 0.26, r = 0.9). Compliance at actual bladder capacity was 3.4 +/- 1.2 ml./cm. H2O for cystometry versus 3.8 +/- 0.8 for overnight urodynamics (p = 0.28, r = 0.9). There was good correlation between daytime cystometry and overnight urodynamics (p <0.001, Pearson's coefficient correlation 0.92, 95% confidence interval 0.90 to 0.94). A kappa statistical analysis showed good agreement between cystometry and overnight urodynamics for stable bladder and frank detrusor instability (kappa = 0.9). Replicated measurements of the same patient by the same observer had an error of variance of 1.7 cm. H2O with a narrow confidence interval, indicating the measurement error was small and that overnight urodynamics can be reproduced with relative accuracy within an individual. All 6 children preferred overnight urodynamics to cystometry. CONCLUSIONS: There was good correlation between bladder behavior day and night. Overnight urodynamics were accurate in predicting detrusor activity, and well tolerated and less embarrassing for a child with neurogenic vesical dysfunction.
OBJECTIVES: Multiple sclerosis (MS) causes neurologic symptoms to change over time. Voiding dysfunction is common in patients with MS, and few studies have examined the changes in urodynamic patterns in these patients over time. The purpose of this study was to examine the frequency and nature of urodynamic pattern changes in patients with MS who underwent two or more urodynamic studies. METHODS: Twenty-two patients (7 men and 15 women) with well-documented MS were referred to one urologist (T.B.B.) for evaluation of lower urinary tract symptoms. All patients had undergone two or more urodynamic evaluations during a 14-year period for persistent or new symptoms, and a retrospective comparison was made among the urodynamic test results. RESULTS: Overall, 12 (55%) of 22 patients experienced a change in their urodynamic patterns and/or compliance during a mean follow-up interval of 42 +/- 45 months between the urodynamic studies. Most patients initially had urodynamic patterns showing detrusor hyperreflexia, detrusor external sphincter dyssynergia, or detrusor hypocontractility. Fourteen (64%) of the 22 patients studied had the same or worsening of the same symptoms and 8 (36%) of 22 had new urologic symptoms. Six (43%) of 14 patients with no new symptoms and 6 (75%) of 8 with new symptoms had significant changes found with follow-up urodynamic testing. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients with MS with and without new urinary symptoms will develop changes in their underlying urodynamic patterns and detrusor compliance. Therefore, urodynamic evaluations should be repeated at regular intervals in symptomatic patients to optimize clinical management, reduce complications, and better enable these patients to manage their neurogenic bladder dysfunction.
OBJECTIVES: To summarise the evidence for the role of urodynamic tests in the diagnosis and classification of urinary incontinence. METHODS: Reference lists in relevant papers were reviewed and MEDLINE searches conducted. RESULTS: The mean sensitivity (specificity) of clinical history versus urodynamic tests was 0.82 (0.57) for stress incontinence, 0.69 (0.60) for urge incontinence/overactive bladder, and 0.51 (0.66) for patients with mixed incontinence. The proportion of women with a clinical diagnosis of urinary incontinence but with normal findings from urodynamic tests ranged from 3 to 8%. Overall sensitivity of urodynamic tests was about 85-90% in the diagnosis of urodynamic stress incontinence, but generally lower following diagnosis of urge and mixed incontinence. No relationship emerged between urodynamic test results and response to medical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This literature review shows that the sensitivity of clinical history versus urodynamic tests was 0.82, 0.69 and 0.51 respectively for stress, urge and mixed urinary incontinence. It also suggests that urodynamic diagnosis does not predict response to treatment. These data add to the ongoing 'urodynamics or no urodynamics' debate in the evaluation of urinary incontinence and show that urodynamic testing may not be helpful for patients receiving initial non-invasive therapy. These data are in line with the conclusions of the 1st and 2nd International Consultations on incontinence.
The use of computers in urodynamics must be based preferably on the structure of the urodynamic investigation itself. This enables implementation of computerized systems in the urodynamic laboratory in the most natural way and provides transparency of urodynamic software for the investigators. Additionally, the algorithms of the urodynamic software then can provide for a urodynamic investigation following a logical path based on the patient's history and clinical data and (automatically interpreted) results from earlier steps in the urodynamics. As an extension of this structured logical reasoning, the computer use in urodynamics can be extended to include validation and decision rules, comprising measurement data and rules for interpretation and combination of history, clinical and measurement data. Conclusions will be presented then in the form of a preliminary differential diagnosis, including the odds for each of the possible diagnoses. These kinds of computerized interpretation systems will be validated by comparison with the classical clinical diagnoses and are generally known as expert systems. These systems rely on logical branching-as opposed to systems that are statistical in nature and use large data bases to classify individual data into known groups. Data bases will remain for the purpose of documentation, based on individual patients and comprising all patient data-comparable to the existing patient files in the hospital's archives. The computer files have to include also the original data from functional studies like urodynamics-and not just the abstracted conclusions-and from imaging techniques. Intelligent compression of data prevents the data bases from exploding. Digital imaging techniques combined with computerized urodynamic investigations open possibilities for dynamic analysis of morphologic data and combination thereof with urodynamic measurement data.
PURPOSE: To our knowledge there are no studies of the correlation between urinary complaints or urodynamic findings in multiple sclerosis and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. We investigated the correlation of urodynamic results in multiple sclerosis patients with voiding complaints to the cranial MRI findings. We also sought to correlate urodynamic results in these patients with International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed urodynamic results and cranial MRI findings in 90 multiple sclerosis patients (64 women, 26 men, mean age 44.5 years) with voiding complaints. The most recent urodynamic study and cranial MRI for each patient were reviewed. The interval between the 2 studies and MRI was no more than 6 months. Detrusor contractions were categorized as areflexic, hyporeflexic, hyperreflexic or hyperreflexic with impaired contractility. The presence of impaired compliance or detrusor-external sphincter dyssynergia was recorded. The cranial MRI findings were categorized on the basis of the presence of atrophy or enhancing lesions, total number of lesions and size of largest lesion. The urodynamic and MRI findings were correlated. Of the patients 40 who had urodynamic studies done within the last 6 months completed the IPSS, and severity of cranial MRI findings in these patients was correlated with the IPSS results. In addition, the presence of irritative findings of detrusor hyperreflexia or detrusor hyperreflexia with impaired contractility was correlated with the irritative score (sum of questions 1, 2, 4, 7), and the presence of detrusor-external sphincter dyssynergia was correlated with the obstructive score (sum of questions 3, 5, 6). RESULTS: There was no correlation between urodynamic category, presence of impaired compliance or presence of detrusor-external sphincter dyssynergia and any of the MRI findings of atrophy or enhancing lesions, total number of lesions or size of the largest lesions. In the patients who completed the IPSS there was no correlation between total number of lesions and IPSS score. There was no correlation between the presence of detrusor-external sphincter dyssynergia and obstructive score on the IPSS or between the presence of detrusor hyperreflexia and irritative score. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with multiple sclerosis often are followed closely with urodynamic studies and cranial MRI, there appears to be no correlation between these 2 studies. Symptom scores also do not appear to correlate with urodynamic findings. Therefore, urodynamic studies appear to be warranted and irreplaceable in the evaluation of voiding dysfunction in multiple sclerosis patients.
OBJECTIVES: We investigated the symptomatic and urodynamic effects of several noninvasive and minimally invasive treatment modalities to quantify these effects and to compare subjective and objective results within groups with various degrees of obstruction. METHODS: In a prospective study at one center, 487 patients who completed a full screening program including urodynamic investigation started treatment with watchful waiting, terazosin, transurethral microwave thermotherapy, or laser treatment of the prostate; they were re-evaluated symptomatically and urodynamically after 6 months of therapy. The symptomatic and urodynamic results of 87 patients from another center who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate and who had their second urodynamic evaluation 6 months after surgery were also included. RESULTS: In patients without bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), improvement in maximum flow and symptom scores with little change in the degree of obstruction was most apparent, whereas a decrease of detrusor pressure at maximum flow was observed mainly in patients with BOO. The urodynamic effect but not the symptomatic effect of treatments depended on the initial grade of BOO. Urodynamic changes were more marked in the minimally invasive treatment groups compared with the noninvasive treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: In symptomatic patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia, symptomatic improvement in the short term does not seem to depend on changes in urodynamic parameters. Future well-controlled studies focusing on the durability of symptomatic and urodynamic effects will be needed to illustrate the relative potential of urodynamic and other clinical parameters to predict a favorable response to current and innovative treatments.
PURPOSE: We compared ambulatory urodynamics and conventional video cystometry findings in women with symptoms of bladder overactivity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective randomized crossover study 106 women with symptoms of urinary urgency with or without incontinence were comprehensively investigated by video cystometry and ambulatory urodynamics in random order. In addition, all women completed a validated symptoms questionnaire and voiding diary. RESULTS: Involuntary detrusor activity was detected in 32 and 70 cases on video cystometry and ambulatory urodynamics, respectively (p <0.001). Video cystometry done according to International Continence Society standards diagnosed detrusor instability in 4 women with no involuntary detrusor activity on ambulatory urodynamics. Involuntary detrusor activity resulting in incontinence was observed in 39 cases on ambulatory urodynamics, including 20 (51%) with stable video cystometry results. Stress incontinence was diagnosed in 42 cases on video cystometry and in 34 on ambulatory urodynamics (p = 0.629). Increasingly severe urge and stress incontinence reported in the symptoms questionnaire correlated positively with the subsequent detection of detrusor overactivity and stress incontinence, respectively, on the 2 urodynamic tests. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to video cystometry, ambulatory urodynamics provides objective evidence of clinically important bladder overactivity in the majority of women with symptoms suggestive of bladder overactivity. The correlation of symptoms with ambulatory urodynamic findings implies that greater reliance may be placed on symptomatic diagnosis of bladder overactivity. Improved objective assessment of detrusor function provided by ambulatory urodynamics has implications for the definition of bladder overactivity and relevance of conventional cystometry in this context. In women who complain of urgency stable conventional cystometrography findings should be interpreted with caution.