SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “artificial intelligence (AI)”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2026

Decoding cancer with artificial intelligence: Transforming research, diagnosis, and therapy with future insights.

Cancer remains one of the leading global health burdens, with increasing complexity in genomic, imaging, and clinical datasets presenting significant challenges for effective management. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a powerful tool to address these challenges by enabling pattern recognition, knowledge integration, and data-driven decision-making. This review highlights recent advances in the application of AI across cancer research, diagnosis, and therapy. In research, AI accelerates drug discovery and repurposing, enhances genomic data interpretation, and facilitates biomarker identification through multi-omics integration. In diagnosis, AI has demonstrated high technical performance in radiology for lesion detection and image segmentation, in pathology for tumour grading and molecular prediction, and in liquid biopsy for non-invasive biomarker analysis. In therapy, AI supports precision medicine by predicting treatment responses, monitoring disease progression, and optimizing clinical trial design. Despite these advances, barriers such as data heterogeneity, algorithmic bias, interpretability, and regulatory challenges remain. Future directions, including explainable AI, federated learning, multimodal modelling, and digital twins, hold promise for translating AI-driven innovations into routine oncology practice. Significance Statement This review provides a timely synthesis of recent (2020-2025) advances in artificial intelligence across cancer research, diagnosis, and therapy, highlighting applications in drug discovery, genomics, multi-omics biomarker identification, and clinical decision-making. By integrating technological progress with translational and clinical relevance, this work serves as a valuable resource for bridging AI innovation with precision oncology practice. As a narrative review, the literature was identified through targeted PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar searches, combining terms for artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning with cancer-related keywords, with priority given to peer-reviewed studies published between 2020 and 2025, seminal earlier works, and official regulatory or guideline documents. Within each domain, representative studies were selected to illustrate methodological diversity, clinical context, and current translational readiness rather than to provide exhaustive coverage of an extremely rapidly evolving field.

Artificial intelligence↗

PubMed2026

Safeguarding biomedical AI: a critical scoping review of privacy-enhancing technologies, hybrid approaches, and deployment models.

BACKGROUND: Biomedical artificial intelligence (AI) requires the integration of privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs) to safeguard sensitive clinical, imaging, and genomic data while preserving analytical utility. OBJECTIVES: This review critically and systematically maps applications of PETs across the biomedical AI lifecycle in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines and evaluates their technical trade-offs, deployment feasibility, and residual risks. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, and Scopus for studies published between 2015 and 2025. Eligible studies addressed differential privacy, federated learning, secure multiparty computation, homomorphic encryption, or hybrid approaches in biomedical AI. Data were charted on PET type, modality, lifecycle stage, utility metrics, privacy parameters, and deployment considerations. A critical appraisal rubric assessed threat-model adequacy, methodological clarity, reproducibility, privacy-utility transparency, and deployment realism. Additionally, we hand-searched major venues (USENIX Security, NeurIPS, AAAI) and screened Google Scholar for grey literature, applying de-duplication across sources. RESULTS: We identified 87 studies spanning clinical decision support, genomics, and medical imaging. From 25,761 initial records, 3,754 underwent title/abstract screening and 1,968 underwent full-text assessment. PETs demonstrated distinct strengths and limitations: differential privacy provided provable guarantees but reduced performance on imbalanced data; federated learning improved data access but remained vulnerable to gradient leakage; and cryptographic methods ensured confidentiality at high computational cost. Synthetic data generation supported privacy-conscious data sharing and benchmarking but remained sensitive to disclosure risk, fidelity loss, and subgroup representation. Hybrid and emerging approaches, including trusted execution environments, zero-knowledge proofs, and privacy-preserving transformer architectures, mitigated composability gaps yet lacked full end-to-end assurance. Case studies at hospital and biobank scale illustrated practical feasibility and infrastructure demands. CONCLUSIONS: Situating PETs within technical and operational contexts clarifies their capabilities, limitations, and deployment challenges. Residual risks persist, including fairness concerns, inference-time leakage, and overreliance on PETs as compliance proxies. Sustained technical innovation and institutional governance remain essential for the trustworthy integration of PETs in biomedical AI.

biomedical AI↗

PubMed2026

A systematic approach to standardizing the visual appearance of endometriotic lesions for artificial intelligence recognition.

INTRODUCTION: Numerous studies have shown that the diagnostic performance and reproducibility of visual recognition of endometriosis during laparoscopy are poor. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) seems relevant for exhaustive lesion recognition. Standardization of the visual classification of lesions, in the form of an ontology, is an essential prerequisite to enable medical experts to annotate surgical data consistently and subsequently allow engineers to train and build an artificial intelligence tool for endometriosis recognition. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in the MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases up to May 2022, aiming to identify studies describing the laparoscopic visual appearance of superficial endometriosis, endometriomas, and deep infiltrating endometriosis. The accumulated data in the literature concerning the visual appearance of the different forms of endometriosis were used to create an ontology that could be used for artificial intelligence applications. RESULTS: Out of 932 articles screened, 35 studies were selected based on the inclusion criteria of human subjects with histologically confirmed endometriosis lesions visualized via laparoscopy. The selected studies were reviewed to develop a visual ontology of endometriosis lesions observed via laparoscopy. The lesions were categorized into 4 classes and further subdivided into 11 subclasses: superficial (black, red, white, or subtle), adhesions (dense or filmy), deep (obliteration, retraction, or deformation), and ovarian (endometrioma or chocolate fluid). The positive predictive value (PPV) varied across lesion types: black lesions (PPV 47%-97%), red lesions (PPV 33%-100%), white lesions (PPV 20%-81%), and ovarian endometriosis (PPV 42%-98%). Nonspecific lesions such as adhesions (PPV 16%-50%) and subtle superficial lesions (PPV 0%-67%) presented lower PPVs. Deep endometriosis lesions, often buried within organs, required indirect signs (obliteration, retraction, deformation) for identification. CONCLUSIONS: The visual ontology proposed in this systematic search could facilitate the detection and classification of endometriosis lesions using artificial intelligence. This study highlights the challenges of reaching a consensus on lesion recognition and classification in AI projects due to the diverse visual presentations of endometriosis.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Artificial intelligence in genitourinary oncology: publication trends and systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct an analysis of publication trends and a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to characterize the current state of artificial intelligence (AI) use in genitourinary (GU) oncology, as AI has emerged as a transformative tool in healthcare with potential applications in diagnostics, treatment planning, and prognostication. METHODS: We searched the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE; Ovid), and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) Ultimate for studies related to AI and GU oncology, excluding non-English papers, non-human studies, review articles, and articles using AI solely for manuscript writing. Publication trends were analysed from 2013 to 2023 and categorized by study design and cancer type. RCTs were evaluated through systematic review using Covidence (Veritas Health Innovation Ltd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia) for screening and data extraction. Two reviewers independently assessed all studies, with risk of bias (RoB) evaluated using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. RESULTS: Of 2409 articles identified, 1220 met inclusion criteria. These included 962 retrospective articles, 175 prospective studies, 79 studies with combined retrospective/prospective methods, and four RCTs. Studies most commonly addressed prostate (n = 923), renal (n = 274), and urothelial (n = 194) cancers. Publications grew from 14 in 2013 to 362 in 2023, with substantial acceleration in 2019. Four RCTs were identified - one in urothelial cancer and three in prostate cancer. Two RCTs evaluated AI-based diagnostics, demonstrating improved performance over conventional methods; the remaining two RCTs evaluated AI in prognostication and treatment planning, showing improved gains in imaging interpretation and operational efficiency. RoB varied across studies, primarily related to randomisation and deviations from intended interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Artificial intelligence research in GU oncology has grown, although high-level evidence from RCTs remains limited. Existing trials underscore AI's promise in diagnostics, prognostication, and treatment planning, and the rapidly evolving nature of this field warrants continued prospective investigation.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Exploring the use of machine and deep learning in genome-wide association studies: a comprehensive review.

The advent of high-throughput sequencing technologies has generated increasingly large and complex genomic datasets, necessitating analytical approaches capable of capturing high-dimensional and potentially nonlinear genetic interactions. This situation has significantly impacted the entire field of Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS), whose primary goal is the identification of genomic traits and variants that are statistically associated with the risk of a disease. However, traditional GWAS methods may show reduced performance when applied to highly polygenic and nonlinear genetic architectures. Computational strategies from Artificial Intelligence (AI) and, in particular, from machine- and deep-learning may provide a powerful tool to overcome such limitations, especially by capturing nonlinear interactions and complex hidden regularities in large-scale data, which traditional GWAS approaches might overlook. To date, only a few approaches have been introduced and systematically assessed. In this review, we describe the main characteristics and limitations of standard statistical approaches for GWAS, the main uses of AI methods in computational genomics, and recent attempts to leverage AI strategies in GWAS. Particular attention will be devoted to key issues, such as the interpretability of methods and results, and the curse of dimensionality. More specifically, the review presents 30 methods designed to leverage AI in GWAS, as well as presenting a comprehensive set of evaluation metrics for their performance, also providing references to the most frequently used databases, and biobanks. Overall, this work may serve as a starting point for both dry- and wet-lab researchers, aiming to extract deeper insights from genomic data by moving beyond traditional linear additive assumptions, and leveraging large-scale datasets through AI-driven approaches.

Artificial intelligence↗

PubMed2026

A Sentiment-Based Comparison of AI- and Physician-Generated Empathic Statements in Palliative Care.

CONTEXT: Empathic communication promotes trust in patient-provider relationships. As healthcare integrates artificial intelligence (AI) into patient communication, we have yet to understand how these models' communication compares to that of physicians. OBJECTIVES: Our primary objectives were to examine patient preferences for AI-generated vs. palliative care physician-generated empathic statements addressing fear and anxiety around cancer treatment, and to analyze associations between linguistic features and patient preferences. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of the PALL-AI trial, a randomized controlled survey comparing cancer patients' preferences of AI- to physician-generated empathic statements. Physicians and AI were provided the same prompt with a maximum sentence length. Patient preferences for each statement were measured in blinded surveys. We analyzed sentiment of the statements using the Valence Aware Dictionary and Sentiment Reasoner (VADER) and the National Research Council Canada (NRC) Emotion Lexicon. We evaluated associations between sentiment scores and patient preferences using Spearman's correlation coefficients. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients completed blinded surveys, preferring the AI-generated statement 72.4% of the time. VADER sentiment analysis showed all three AI statements displayed positive sentiment, while all three physician statements displayed negative sentiment. Controlling for statement length, AI statements used twice as many positive words as human statements. However, they contained a similar number of negative words. Of the eight NRC emotions, "trust" and "joy" demonstrated the strongest correlations with patient preference. CONCLUSION: Patients preferred AI-generated statements around cancer care over those from palliative care physicians when standardized for prompt and statement length. Analysis shows AI-generated statements contain more positive language which may be the factor driving patient preference toward AI.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Integrating ex vivo platforms with AI to guide glioblastoma treatment.

PURPOSE: Ex vivo platforms can rapidly and cost-effectively screen patient-derived tumor cells or tissue. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms can search and identify patterns in large datasets and provide predictions. This review focuses on integrating microphysiological platforms with AI to inform physician and patient decision-making. METHODS AND RESULTS: Combining efficacy, safety, and pharmacology results from drug screens with the output of extensive AI searches can yield insights to guide physician and patient decision-making and potentially improve a patient's prognosis. We detail ex vivo platforms at different stages of development that represent the diversity of approaches: a microphysiological system and a high-throughput screen that assesses drug cytotoxicity in both bulk and drug-tolerant tumor cells. We review AI approaches that can enhance the utility of microphysiological platforms. CONCLUSION: Integrating emerging microphysiological platforms with AI is expected to significantly impact physician and patient choice of treatment.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Enhanced fracture detection on radiographs with AI assistance for clinicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Emergency radiographic interpretation for fractures is prone to missed or misdiagnoses. Artificial intelligence (AI) is expected to become a powerful tool to assist clinicians in fracture detection. PURPOSE: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to assess whether AI improves clinicians' ability to detect fractures on radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for studies published between January 1, 2010, and October 10, 2025. A meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies was performed using a Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic (SROC) curve. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 26 studies were included . The pooled sensitivity of clinicians increased from 77% (95% CI: 72-81) to 87% (95% CI: 83-90) with AI assistance, while the pooled specificity improved from 88% (95% CI: 85-90) to 92% (95% CI: 89-94). The corresponding AUC values were 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87-0.92) before and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97) after AI assistance. Eight studies were rated as high risk of bias. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression identified potential sources of heterogeneity, including fracture location, AI model type, high risk of bias, and reference standards. CONCLUSION: AI assistance significantly improves clinicians' diagnostic performance in detecting fractures on radiographs for extremity and trunk fractures.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Artificial Intelligence for Natural Products Discovery and Development.

Natural products (NPs) remain a cornerstone of modern drug discovery, offering stereochemical complexity and diverse bioactivities that precisely modulate therapeutic targets, refined through billions of years of evolution. However, their research has long been hindered by inefficient, empirical workflows, high resource consumption, structural complexity, and the "multicomponent, multi-target" nature of their mechanisms. The exponential growth of genomic, metabolomic, and spectral data has overwhelmed conventional analytical methods, exposing critical bottlenecks in handling high-dimensional, heterogeneous datasets that exceed human interpretive capacity. Artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as a transformative paradigm to address these challenges, integrating multi-omics and chemical data to shift NP research from fragmented empiricism toward mechanism-driven, precision-oriented development. By leveraging deep learning architectures- including graph neural networks, Transformers, and diffusion-based generative models-AI enables systematic decoding of NP biosynthesis, automated structure elucidation, rational target identification, knowledge extraction from vast unstructured scientific literature, and de novo molecular design. This review comprehensively surveys recent advances in AI applications across the full NP discovery and development pipeline, encompassing genome mining, structure-based and ligand-based virtual screening, multimodal structural characterization, lead optimization, and biosynthetic pathway engineering. We further examine the emerging roles of protein-centric, molecule- centric, and multimodal foundation models, as well as large language models, in bridging genotype-to-chemotype gaps and unlocking unstructured scientific knowledge. Finally, we discuss critical challenges including data scarcity, representational limitations for complex stereochemistry, physical plausibility in generative models, and the urgent need for experimental validation, while outlining future directions toward autonomous experimentation, closed-loop optimization, and human-AI collaborative discovery.

Artificial intelligence↗

PubMed2026

Privacy, security, and reliability risks of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a systematic review of empirical evidence.

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into healthcare information systems, supporting clinical decision-making, imaging analysis, and predictive modeling. While these applications offer operational and clinical benefits, they also introduce emerging risks to patient privacy, data security, and system reliability. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review empirical evidence on privacy breaches, security vulnerabilities, and misuse associated with AI applications in healthcare settings. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library were searched for empirical studies published between January 2015 and November 2025 that evaluated AI use or misuse in clinical diagnosis, treatment, or decision-making. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data using a standardized form. Findings were synthesized narratively due to heterogeneity in study designs, AI methods, and reported outcomes. RESULTS: Of 7,285 records identified through database searches and 205 through citation screening, 22 empirical studies met the inclusion criteria, spanning multiple clinical domains and data modalities, predominantly medical imaging applications. Five recurring threat categories were identified: patient re-identification, membership inference, unauthorized access and adversarial exploitation, input manipulation, and misuse or overinterpretation of AI outputs. Across studies, AI models were shown to encode latent biometric signals across diverse data types, limiting the effectiveness of traditional anonymization and synthetic data approaches. Adversarial attacks and input manipulation were also shown to compromise diagnostic performance and system integrity. CONCLUSION: This systematic review provides empirical evidence suggesting that contemporary AI systems in healthcare introduce privacy and security risks that may challenge traditional assumptions about data protection. These findings underscore the need for privacy- and security-by-design approaches and governance frameworks that address risks across the AI lifecycle.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

The Role of Artificial Intelligence for Intimate Partner Violence Prevention: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Intimate partner violence (IPV), encompassing physical, sexual, emotional and economic abuse, remains a pervasive global health concern. Traditional prevention efforts face obstacles such as underreporting, delayed detection and limited personalised support. Emerging artificial intelligence (AI) approaches offer new opportunities to enhance IPV prevention. AIM: This systematic review maps and synthesises evidence on AI-driven tools in IPV prevention based on studies published between 2004 and 2024. METHODS: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines and PROSPERO registration, we searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, IEEE Xplore and Web of Science. Eligible studies explicitly evaluated AI technologies targeting IPV prediction, screening, intervention or support delivery. Study quality was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). RESULTS: Of 1304 records initially identified, 41 studies met eligibility criteria. AI applications ranged from machine learning (ML) for risk prediction and natural language processing (NLP) for IPV detection in clinical and social media data, to image analysis for forensic evaluation and chatbot-based support. Predictive modelling demonstrated strong discriminative performance, while NLP-based screening detected IPV with notable sensitivity. Chatbots showed feasibility and user acceptability, but evidence of their direct impact on reducing IPV incidence was limited, with one randomised controlled trial showing a modest reduction. Key challenges identified included algorithmic bias, data privacy risks and barriers to integration across health and social care systems. DISCUSSION: AI-informed interventions show promise for improving IPV detection, risk assessment, and scalable support, but questions remain about long-term effectiveness, ethical fairness, transparency and equitable implementation. Future interdisciplinary research should address these concerns to responsibly deploy AI in IPV prevention. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The findings highlight the importance of trauma-informed, culturally responsive care and provider training in AI applications. Nurse-led innovation and policy advocacy will be crucial for safe, equitable integration of AI in IPV prevention.

Artificial Intelligence↗

PubMed2025

Diagnosing the undiagnosed: AI-enhanced multimodal modeling for placental mesenchymal dysplasia in high-risk pregnancies.

Placental mesenchymal dysplasia (PMD) is a rare vascular placental disorder that mimics molar pregnancy but often coexists with a viable fetus, making its misdiagnosis potentially devastating. In high-risk pregnancies, artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced multimodal modeling - incorporating imaging, genomics, proteomics, and clinical features - offers a transformative diagnostic strategy. Leveraging Bayesian hyperparameter optimization for model refinement, this approach improves diagnostic accuracy while reducing uncertainty and clinician hesitation. Recent clinical studies support its efficacy and interpretability through SHAP and LIME models, while real-time surgical enhancements using Bayesian methods highlight its broader clinical utility. Despite current challenges such as data heterogeneity and integration barriers, multimodal AI provides unprecedented resolution in placental analysis, enabling precise differentiation between PMD and similar fetopathies. Ultimately, this advancement supports timely, non-invasive diagnosis, personalized management, and emotionally informed decision-making aligned with ethical AI implementation standards.

Bayesian optimization↗

PubMed2026

Next-generation brain proteomics: Integrating single-cell, spatial, and multi-omics for clinical biomarker discovery.

The mammalian brain's functional complexity arises from the sophisticated architecture of neurons and glia. This network is essentially defined by its dynamic proteome, which reveals the functional execution underlying neural computation and disease. This review integrates the technological leap in neuroproteomics. It has moved beyond bulk tissue proteome cataloguing to high-sensitivity single-cell and spatial resolution. We detail how next-generation platforms, such as TIMS-PASEF and Orbitrap-Astral, have enabled deeper and faster phenotypic profiling of limited brain samples. However, the proteome coverage remains constrained by dynamic range, sample loss, ionisation bias and incomplete detection of low-abundance regulatory proteins. We further examine how such studies have revealed the proteomic remodelling that drives lineage specification and synaptic plasticity by linking temporal protein expression waves to biological function. Crucially, we delineate the clinical translational trajectory, illustrating how aberrant signatures are verified in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and validated in plasma to support precision medicine. Finally, we argue for the necessity of "fused" multi-omics integration and Artificial Intelligence (AI) to decode the non-linear molecular logic of brain pathology.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

AutoPVPrimer: A comprehensive AI-Enhanced pipeline for efficient plant virus primer design and assessment.

Plant viruses pose a significant threat to global agriculture and require efficient tools for their timely detection. We present AutoPVPrimer, an innovative pipeline that integrates artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning to accelerate the development of plant virus primers. The pipeline uses Biopython to automatically retrieve different genomic sequences from the NCBI database to increase the robustness of the subsequent primer design. The design_primers_with_tuning module uses a random forest classifier that optimizes parameters and provides flexibility for different experimental conditions. Quality control measures, including the evaluation of poly-X content and melting temperature, increase primer reliability. Unique to AutoPVPrimer is the visualize_primer_dimer module, which supports the visual evaluation of primer dimers-a feature missing in other tools. Primer specificity is validated via primer BLAST, which contributes to the overall efficiency of the pipeline. AutoPVPrimer has been successfully applied to the tomato mosaic virus, proving its adaptability and efficiency. The modular design allows customization by the user and extends the applicability to different plant viruses and experimental scenarios. The pipeline represents a significant advance in primer design and provides researchers with an effective tool to accelerate molecular biology experiments. Future developments aim to extend compatibility and incorporate user feedback to consolidate AutoPVPrimer as an innovative contribution to the bioinformatics toolbox and a promising resource for the advancement of plant virology research.

DNA Primers↗

PubMed2026

Decoding the spatiotemporal patterns of food spoilage microbial communities: Integrating multi-omics and artificial intelligence to enable precision preservation.

In the global food supply chain, food wastage caused by spoilage has resulted in significant economic losses, food shortages, and environmental pressure. This process is fundamentally driven by the spatiotemporal dynamics of microbial communities. However, traditional research methods struggle to elucidate the complex mechanisms of spatial heterogeneity, interspecies interactions, and functional succession. This limits the development of effective preservation strategies. This review systematically reviews the cutting-edge progress of integrating multi-omics technologies and artificial intelligence (AI) to study food spoilage microbial communities, breaking through this bottleneck. We propose an intelligent theoretical framework that could potentially analyze microbial metabolic activities and predict dynamic shelf life if implemented. The conceptual framework integrates multidimensional data, including spatial metabolomics, temporal metatranscriptomics, single-cell transcriptomics, and longitudinal metagenomics. It can also be combined with AI models, such as graph neural networks. The article elaborates on the principles and applications of spatio-temporal monitoring technologies, such as nano secondary ion mass spectrometry, hyperspectral imaging, and the Internet of Things sensing. Through illustrative cases of typical perishable foods, it also explores how such a multi-omics - AI system might be applied to spoilage warning and precise intervention. Additionally, the article addresses the current challenges in data coverage, model generalization, and federated learning implementation. Then the research further explores emerging areas such as engineered probiotics, edge AI, and microfluidic sensing. These areas are targeted at transforming food preservation from an empirical control approach to a data-driven, precise regulatory framework. This transformation provides theoretical support and technical approaches for developing a smart, sustainable food preservation system.

Multiomics↗

PubMed2026

How Following Medical Artificial Intelligence Advice Can Mitigate Malpractice Liability: Cross-National Insights from a Randomized Trial.

Artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly influences clinical decision-making, yet its recommendations may diverge from standard care. Although malpractice concerns are thought to discourage physicians from following AI advice, experimental evidence from the United States suggests the opposite: lay jurors are more likely to hold physicians liable when they reject AI recommendations. Whether this pattern extends to systems in which court-appointed experts, not lay jurors, determine liability remains unknown. Methods: To examine how physicians and laypeople in expert-based and lay-juror legal systems evaluate physicians' acceptance or rejection of AI recommendations, particularly when those recommendations deviate from standard care, we designed a randomized vignette study: a 2 × 2 factorial design varying the AI recommendation (standard vs. nonstandard care) and a fictional physician's decision (accept vs. reject). The study was conducted online in 2023 among nationally representative samples of U.S. and German adults and from 2023 to 2024 among German physicians. In total, 387 German physicians, 2291 U.S. adults, and 2283 German adults participated; those not completing the survey or failing attention checks were excluded per preregistered criteria. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 vignettes, varying the AI recommendation (standard vs. nonstandard care) and physician's decision (accept vs. reject). The reasonableness of the fictional physician's decision was measured, rated by participants on a Likert scale. Results: Analysis, following preregistered exclusion criteria, included 248 German physicians, 1202 U.S. adults, and 1358 German adults. Physicians accepting standard-care AI recommendations were rated more reasonable than those rejecting them (U.S. laypeople: t = 5.36; 95% CI, 0.45-0.97; P < 0.001; German physicians: t = 2.47; 95% CI, 0.14-1.30; P = 0.02; German laypeople: t = 4.14; 95% CI, 0.27-0.76; P < 0.001). Ratings of physicians accepting versus rejecting AI nonstandard-care recommendations were statistically equivalent. Equivalence was tested at an α-value of 0.05 using a two 1-sided tests procedure, reported with 90% CIs per standard convention (U.S. laypeople: t = -4.90; 90% CI, -0.1 to 0.36; P < 0.001; German physicians: t = -1.76; 90% CI, -0.12 to 0.67; P = 0.04; German laypeople: t = 5.35; 90% CI, -0.35 to 0.06; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Across the United States and Germany, samples representative of lay jurors and court-appointed experts viewed accepting standard-care AI advice as more reasonable, whereas accepting or rejecting nonstandard-care AI advice was judged similarly. Contrary to predictions, malpractice liability regimes do not necessarily pose a barrier to AI use in precision medicine.

Artificial Intelligence↗

PubMed2026

The future of precision oncology and artificial intelligence in Belgium: scenarios and policy responses.

PURPOSE: Precision medicine, also known as personalized medicine, enables the provision of tailored health services to patients. In the prevention, early detection, and treatment of cancers, precision medicine is highly promising, given the increasing use of genomic profiling for diagnosis and adapting therapies in several tumor types. Artificial Intelligence (AI) can support this process by analyzing vast amounts of relevant data. However, high-quality data and financial investments in the health system are essential for the implementation of precision medicine and AI solutions in routine cancer care. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Building on the quantitative outcomes of a foresight exercise published in another study, this article collects qualitative data to gain more detailed insights into the future of precision oncology in Belgium and discusses the role of AI in this field. It reports the results of a series of expert workshops, focusing on four hypothetical future scenarios that are centered around technological and economic issues that must be overcome for the widespread use of precision oncology in Belgium. FINDINGS: The study concludes that all four scenarios discussed in the workshops would require supportive policy measures in Belgium, which should go beyond mere technological and economic considerations, such as involving patient associations and the public in policy design or creating multi-disciplinary expert groups for precision medicine. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to employ foresight methodology to illustrate possible future scenarios, scrutinize feasible approaches for implementing precision oncology in Belgium, and discuss the use of AI in this context.

Belgium↗

PubMed2026

AI-Driven Multi-Omics Integration of Synthetic Colon Adenocarcinoma for Cluster-Guided PROTAC Candidate Design Targeting KRASG12D.

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer death, yet its molecular heterogeneity remains poorly translated into individualized treatment. We present a reproducible artificial intelligence (AI) framework that integrates multi-omics benchmarking, sample-level drug prioritization, E3 ubiquitin ligase selection, and shape-anchored Proteolysis Targeting Chimera (PROTAC) design for KRASG12D in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD). A controlled synthetic benchmark comprising 425 tumor and 41 simulated normal profiles, parameterized to match The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) distributions, was used for pipeline verification. Among sixteen methods, the Balanced Latent Integration with Stability Selection (BLISS) model achieved the highest silhouette width (0.86) and competitive agreement (Adjusted Rand Index, ARI, 0.90). The pipeline was validated on real data: a TCGA COAD cohort (186 tumors) with independent Consensus Molecular Subtype (CMS) labels and a CPTAC cohort (104 tumors). Integration modestly recovered CMS (ARI 0.28), and stage, not molecular cluster, drove survival (log-rank p = 0.005 versus 0.81). Sample-level prioritization differed from cluster-level ranking in 82.6% of profiles, below chance (p < 0.0001), without indicating efficacy. Candidate NOVEL00489 showed a good MM-GBSA estimate, matching the reference ASP3082. Compounds are computational candidates requiring experimental validation. This establishes a transparent benchmark for in silico degrader generation in precision oncology.

Humans↗