PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “dermatophytes”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Non-dermatophytes in onychomycosis of the toenails.

A multicentre trial for the treatment of dermatophyte onychomycosis of the toenails with terbinafine was carried out in Australia and New Zealand. Between eight and 12 nail samples were obtained from each of the 118 patients in the 48-week trial, and each sample was investigated by direct microscopy and culture for dermatophyte and non-dermatophyte fungi. Patients were randomized to treatment with terbinafine at 250 mg/day or placebo for the first 12 weeks of the study, then non-responders were offered a 12-week course of terbinafine from week 28. All patients had a dermatophyte infection. In 42 patients (36%) microscopy and mycological culture identified dermatophytes alone. In the remaining 76 patients (64%), a non-dermatophyte mould or yeast was also isolated at some stage during the trial, but in only three patients did the same non-dermatophyte persist in two or more successive nail specimens. The presence of a fungal contaminant in addition to a dermatophyte had no apparent effect on the efficacy of treatment with terbinafine. We conclude that non-dermatophyte moulds and yeasts are generally found as contaminating organisms in dermatophyte onychomycosis, secondary to the dermatophytes, and that they do not influence the outcome of treatment.

Adolescent↗

Pattern of dermatophyte infection in Singapore.

Dermatophyte infection is the fourth commonest skin disorder seen in the National Skin Centre in Singapore. A prospective study was carried out from June 1990 to March 1991 to determine the epidemiology and pattern of dermatophyte infections seen in this centre. Two hundred patients who had a clinical diagnosis of dermatophyte infection and confirmed by direct microscopy were included into the study. Cultures for dermatophyte were done on Sabouraud's dextrose agar with chloramphenicol and cycloheximide. There were 148 male and 52 female patients, of whom 146 (73%) had a positive culture from one or more sites. One hundred and thirty-nine (95.2%) patients had dermatophyte infection while the remaining seven (4.8%) patients had non-dermatophyte infection. The sites involved were the groin (92 patients), feet (52 patients), trunk (26 patients), hands (18 patients), face (9 patients), legs (9 patients), scalp (8 patients) and axilla (7 patients). The commonest dermatophyte isolated was Trichophyton rubrum (81/139). It was also the commonest organism isolated in all the sites except the scalp. The other dermatophytes grown were, in order of frequency, Trichophyton interdigitale (21/139), Epidermophyton floccosum (19/139), Trichophyton mentagrophytes (9/139), Microsporum ferrigineum (4/139), Microsporum canis (4/139) and Microsporum gypseum (1/139). Scalp infections occurred in children and were due either to Microsporum canis or Microsporum ferrigineum. The organisms isolated in our study were either ubiquitous or common in the Asia-Pacific region indicating that certain dermatophytes are more prevalent in certain geographical regions.

Adolescent↗

PCR-based identification of common dermatophyte species using primer sets specific for the DNA topoisomerase II genes.

BACKGROUND: We have determined nucleotide sequences of the DNA topoisomerase II genes of the dermatophyte species, and conducted a PCR-based identification system using species-specific primers for the nucleotide sequences. OBJECTIVE: To identify the major dermatophytes, Trichophyton rubrum, T. mentagrophytes, T. violaceum, M. gypseum, M. canis and E. floccosum, by PCR amplifications at the species level, without determining the nucleotide sequence. METHODS: For PCR-based identification of the major dermatophyte species, a common primer set (dPsD1) for these species and species-specific primer sets (PsT and PsME) for each species were designed based on the genomic sequences of the DNA topoisomerase II genes of the dermatophytes, and tested for their specificities in PCR amplifications. The method consisted of amplification of the genomic DNA topoisomerase II gene by the common primer set, followed by a second PCR with the primer sets consisting of species-specific primers for each dermatophyte species. RESULTS: Using dPsD1, a DNA fragment of 3390 bp was amplified from the genomic DNA of all the dermatophyte species. In the subsequent nested PCR using species-specific primer sets (PsT and PsME), both sets amplified unique sizes of PCR products, all of which corresponded to a species of the dermatophytes even in the presence of other fungal DNA. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that the PCR-based identification targeting the DNA topoisomerase II gene is rapid and simple, and is available as a tool for the identification of the major dermatophyte species.

Arthrodermataceae↗

Preventive effects of various types of footwear and cleaning methods on dermatophyte adhesion.

Tinea pedis is contagious and typically spreads from infected to non-infected persons. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of footwear in preventing tinea pedis adhesion. Using the stamp culture method, we investigated the effectiveness of preventing dermatophyte passage by the wearing of stockings made of nylon, socks made of cotton and tabi (Japanese socks), as well as the effect of removing dermatophytes from these items by washing with soap, cold water and cold water after turning inside-out. For sandals, sneakers and boots, we also investigated the effect of dermatophyte removal by pouring cold water into the footwear, wiping with a wet towel, and pouring boiling water into the footwear. The wearing of socks or tabi was effective in preventing passage of dermatophytes. The stocking material proved to be too thin to prevent passage. On the inner side of socks (the side of the sole), all treatments were effective at removing dermatophytes, but on the outer side of socks (the side touching the surface of the sandals), the treatment of washing in cold water after turning inside-out resulted in significantly more dermatophytes as compared with the other treatments. Pouring cold water, wiping with a wet towel and pouring boiling water were all effective for removing dermatophytes from sandals and sneakers. However, for boots, the treatment of pouring cold water was less effective. To prevent the adhesion of dermatophytes to sandals, wearing socks or tabi was effective, and the treatments of washing socks in cold water after turning inside-out and of pouring cold water into the boots were less effective than the others.

Adult↗

Dermatophytes can trigger cooperative (CAMP-like) haemolytic reactions.

BACKGROUND: Dermatophytes usually grow on skin that is also colonized by bacteria. Therefore, a possible interaction between dermatophytes and bacteria is of potential relevance for the pathogenesis of skin infections. Cell membranes contribute substantially to epidermal barrier function. Erythrocyte haemolysis is a model commonly used to study membrane-damaging effects of microbial factors. Cooperative (CAMP-like) haemolytic reactions are known from distinct bacteria, but not from dermatophytes and bacteria. OBJECTIVES: To investigate CAMP-like reactions of dermatophytes. METHODS: Species of dermatophytes representing the genera Microsporum, Trichophyton and Epidermophyton, erythrocytes from sheep, horse and cattle, cultures of Staphylococcus aureus, S. intermedius, Listeria ivanovii, S. hyicus and S. epidermidis, and cell-free supernatants of bacterial cultures were used to search for cooperative haemolytic effects in in vitro agar diffusion assays. RESULTS: A cooperative (CAMP-like) haemolytic reaction was identified for all dermatophytes tested. Using erythrocytes from sheep and cattle, pretreated with a sphingomyelinase from S. aureus, S. intermedius or L. ivanovii, the fungi induced a distinct zone of complete haemolysis on solid media and in a diffusion test. No CAMP reaction could be detected using S. hyicus or S. epidermidis as a first-step agent or with equine erythrocytes. The lytic reaction of the CAMP-cohaemolysin derived from dermatophytes was always separate from the zone of complete haemolysis, indicating two different cytolytic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show, for the first time, that in principle a CAMP-like effect can occur with dermatophtyes. This is a new observation of potential relevance for the pathogenesis of skin infections. The membrane-damaging factors released by dermatophytes should be further analysed.

Animals↗

Role of Chrysosporium keratinophillum in the parasitic evolution of dermatophytes.

Anti-dermatophytic activity of Chrysosporium keratinophillum against species of the genera Trichophyton, Microsporum and Epidermophyton floccosum was tested in vitro. When C. keratinophillum and different species of dermatophytes were inoculated on Sabouraud's dextrose agar plates 2 cm apart, no antagonistic effect of C. keratinophillum on the mycelial growth of dermatophytes was observed. However, conidia production was not observed on the hyphae of Trichophyton rubrum, Trichophyton tonsurans and E. floccosum grown near C. keratinophillum. The secretory substances released by C. keratinophillum inhibited the growth of T. rubrum, T. tonsurans, Trichophyton mentagrophytes var. interdigitale and E. floccosum at a concentration of 2,000 microg ml(-1) when tested by broth dilution technique. No inhibition of the growth was observed for Microsporum gypseum and Microsporum nanum. The anti-fungal activity of secretory substances released by C. keratinophillum was recorded to be heat stable. Results of the present study suggest that the anti-dermatophytic activity of the secretory substances of C. keratinophillum on T. rubrum, T. mentagrophytes var. interdigitale, T. tonsurans and E. floccosum may be responsible in part, for the absence of these dermatophyte species in soil. Considering the global prevalence of C. keratinophillum in soil one may speculate that the anti-dermatophytic activity of C. keratinophillum is one of the early events for the evolutionary divergence of saprophytic archi-dermatophytes to obligate parasitic dermatophyte species.

Antibiosis↗

Antifungal susceptibility testing of dermatophytes: establishing a medium for inducing conidial growth and evaluation of susceptibility of clinical isolates.

A standardized reference method for dermatophyte in vitro susceptibility testing is lacking. In a previous study, Norris et al. (H. A. Norris, B. E. Elewski, and M. A. Ghannoum, J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 40(6, part 2):S9-S13) established the optimal medium and other growth variables. However, the earlier study did not address two issues: (i) selection of an optimal medium for conidial formation by dermatophytes and (ii) validation of the method with a large number of dermatophytes. The present study addresses these two points. To select which agar medium best supported conidial growth, representative isolates of dermatophytes were grown on different agars. Preliminary experiments showed that only oatmeal cereal agar supported the production of conidia by Trichophyton rubrum. We tested the abilities of 251 T. rubrum isolates to form conidia using three different cereal agars and potato dextrose agar. Overall, oatmeal cereal and rice agar media were comparable in their abilities to support T. rubrum conidial growth. Next, we used the oatmeal cereal agar for conidial formation along with the optimal conditions for dermatophyte susceptibility testing proposed by Norris et al. and determined the antifungal susceptibilities of 217 dermatophytes to fluconazole, griseofulvin, itraconazole, and terbinafine. Relative to the other agents tested, terbinafine possessed the highest antifungal activity against all of the dermatophytes. The mean +/- standard error of the mean MICs of fluconazole, itraconazole, terbinafine, and griseofulvin were 2.07 +/- 0.29, 0.13 +/- 0.01, 0.002 +/- 0.0003, and 0.71 +/- 0.05 microgram/ml, respectively. This study is the first step in the identification of optimal conditions that could be used for the standardization of the antifungal susceptibility testing method for dermatophytes. Inter- and intralaboratory agreement as well as clinical correlations need to be established.

Antifungal Agents↗

Eastern cottontail (sylvilagus floridanus) as carrier of dermatophyte fungi.

Eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus, fam. Leporidae), introduced into Piedmont (Italy) in the 1960s, was studied as carrier of dermatophyte fungi. Of 216 hair samples collected from animals culled between September 1999 and July 2000 in the Province of Alessandria (Piedmont, Italy) during a pest control project, 57 (26.4%) yielded dermatophyte colonies. As two different species of dermatophytes grew from two samples, a total of 59 fungal isolates (26.5%) were obtained. Six dermatophyte species both geophilic (M. gypseum, M. cookei, Trichophyton ajelloi, T. terrestre) and zoophilic (M. canis, T. mentagrophytes) were identified. No sex-related differences were found but season-related differences were observed. The highest prevalence of dermatophyte-positive samples was recorded in May-September, due to the geophilic fungi whose prevalence decreased during colder and increased during warmer months (p < 0.001). The presence of zoophilic dermatophytes, T. mentagrophytes, commonly associated with rodents, small mammals and lagomorphs and M. canis, usually correlated with domestic environment, did not change the whole year round. As Eastern cottontail has been showed to be a carrier of dermatophytes transmissible to man (M. canis, T. mentagrophytes and M. gypseum), it may represent a source of infection for gamekeepers, hunters and veterinarians.

Animals↗

Species-identification of dermatophytes Trichophyton, Microsporum and Epidermophyton by PCR and PCR-RFLP targeting of the DNA topoisomerase II genes.

BACKGROUND: We have focused on the DNA topoisomerase II genes of pathogenic fungi and have previously applied polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based identification of several species including the some of the major dermatophyte species. OBJECTIVE: To identify the dermatophytes (18 species) to a species level by PCR and PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) techniques, without determining the nucleotide sequence. METHODS: The genomic DNAs of the dermatophytes (ten species of Trichophyton, seven species of Microsporum, and Epidermaphyton floccosum) were amplified by PCR using a common primer set (dPsD1) for the dermatophytes, followed by nested PCR using other primer sets (dPsD2, PsT and PsME) that contained primers specific for the DNA topoisomerase II genes of the dermatophytes. PCRs using PsT and PsME were used for the species-identification of Trichophyton, Microsporum and E. floccosum. The PCR products generated by dPsD2 were digested with restriction enzymes (Hinc II, Hinf, Afl II and PflM I), and the restriction profiles were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the eighteen species of dermatophytes, five species (T. rubrum, T. violaceum, M. canis, M. gypseum and E. floccosum) were specifically identified by the PCR using PsT and PsME to the species level, and the remaining species were identified by the unique restriction profiles for each species in the PCR-RFLP analysis, except that the restriction profile of T. mentagrophytes var. interdigitale was identical to that of T. mentagrophytes var. quinckeanum. CONCLUSION: PCR and PCR-RFLP techniques targeting the DNA topoisomerase II gene are simple and rapid, and quite useful as tools for the identification of dermatophytes to the species level.

DNA Topoisomerases, Type II↗

Exocellular enzyme activity of dermatophytes and other fungi isolated from ruminants in Southern Iraq.

Sixteen fungal species were isolated from 182 specimens collected from four ruminants (buffalo, camel, cattle and sheep) in Southern Iraq. Fungi represented by five species of dermatophytes and eleven species of other fungi were screened for the activity of four enzymes: keratinase. proteinase, lipase and amylase. Keratinase was found to be produced by all of the dermatophytes and non-dermatophytes, except for Paecillomyces variottii and Scytalidium lignicola. However, high keratinase activity was expressed by the dermatophytic species particularly by Trichophyton mentagrophytes var. erinacei and Microsporum gypseum. Three dermatophytes viz. M. gypseum, T verrucosum and T. mentagrophytes var. nodulare were capable of producing protease, lipase and amylase. Although, T. mentagrophytes var. erinacei showed high protease activity, it did not produce lipase and amylase. On the contrary most of the non-dermatophytic species revealed protease and lipase activities higher than the dermatophytes. The Curvularia spp. isolates showed the highest protease and amylase activity, while Aspergillus parasiticus revealed the highest activity of lipase andamylase. No correlation was observed between enzyme activity and the growth rate of the examined fungi.

Animals↗

Dermatophytes isolated from patients in University Hospital, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

A total of 576 dermatophytes were isolated from patients with a variety of skin infections from January 1993 to May 2000. Ten species of dermatophytes were identified: Epidermophyton floccosum (0.7%), Microsporum audouinii (1.1%), M. canis (3.1%), M. gypseum (0.3%), Trichophyton concentricum (3.5%), T. equinum (0.2%), T. mentagrophytes (36.1%), T. rubrum (53.8%), T. verrucosum (0.2) and T. violaceum (1.0%). The body sites most frequently affected by dermatophytes were the buttocks, nails and trunk. Anthropophilic dermatophytes made up 60.1% of the isolates; the most common species was T. rubrum, T. mentagrophytes and M. canis were the two main zoophilic dermatophytes. T. mentagrophytes was isolated from all body sites except the scalp. M. canis was found to be associated with domestic dogs and was not isolated from ethnic Malays. The only geophilic dermatophyte was M. gypseum, an uncommon dermatophyte associated with tinea pedis.

Arthrodermataceae↗

In vitro susceptibility testing of ciclopirox, terbinafine, ketoconazole and itraconazole against dermatophytes and nondermatophytes, and in vitro evaluation of combination antifungal activity.

BACKGROUND: With the development of newer antifungal agents with activity against both yeasts and filamentous fungi, there is an increased need to develop and standardize in vitro assays that will evaluate the activity of antimycotics against filamentous fungi. In vitro analysis of antifungal activity of these agents would also allow for the comparison between different antimycotics, which in turn may clarify the reasons for lack of clinical response or serve as an effective therapy for patients with chronic infection. OBJECTIVES: To determine the in vitro susceptibility of fungal organisms to ciclopirox, terbinafine, ketoconazole and itraconazole and to evaluate the in vitro activity and mode of interaction of ciclopirox in combination with either terbinafine or itraconazole. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) study 133 strains were evaluated, including dermatophytes (110 strains; 98 from Trichophyton spp.), Candida spp. (14 strains) and nondermatophyte moulds (nine strains). In vitro susceptibility testing was conducted in microbroth dilutions based on the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) M27-A proposed standard. The testing MIC ranges were 0.003-2 microg mL-1 for ciclopirox and terbinafine, and 0.06-32 microg mL-1 for itraconazole and ketoconazole. For inoculum preparation, dermatophytes were grown on Heinz oatmeal cereal agar slants. Inoculum suspensions of dermatophytes were diluted in RPMI 1640 (Sigma-Aldrich) with the desired final concentration being 2-5 x 103 c.f.u. mL-1. Once inoculated, the microdilution plates were set up according to the NCCLS M27-A method, incubated at 35 degrees C, and read visually following 7 days of incubation. For azole agents, the MIC was the lowest concentration showing 80% growth inhibition; for terbinafine and ciclopirox, the MIC was the lowest concentration showing 100% growth inhibition. In the synergy studies, 29 strains from nondermatophyte species were evaluated using a checkerboard microdilution method. The concentrations tested were: 0 and 0.06-32 microg mL-1 for itraconazole, and 0 and 0.003-4 microg mL-1 for both terbinafine and ciclopirox. Modes of interaction between drugs were classified as synergism, additivism, antagonism or indifference based on fractional inhibitory concentration index values (FIC index). Synergism was defined as an FIC index of < or = 0.50, additivity as an FIC index of < or = 1.0, and antagonism as an FIC index of > or = 2.0. The drug combination was interpreted as indifferent if neither of the drugs had any visible effect on the presence of the other drug. RESULTS: In the MIC study, the dermatophyte MIC values (microg mL-1) (mean +/- SEM) were: ciclopirox (0.04 +/- 0.02), terbinafine (0.04 +/- 0.23), itraconazole (2.28 +/- 7.42) and ketoconazole (0.83 +/- 1.99). The yeast MIC values (microg mL-1) (mean +/- SEM) were: ciclopirox (0.05 +/- 0.02), terbinafine (1.77 +/- 0.58), itraconazole (0.18 +/- 0.27) and ketoconazole (0.56 +/- 0.60). The non-dermatophyte fungi MIC values (microg mL-1) (mean +/- SEM) were: ciclopirox (1.04 +/- 2.62), terbinafine (1.04 +/- 0.95), itraconazole (17.87 +/- 16.75) and ketoconazole (10.69 +/- 13.09). In the synergy study, with ciclopirox in combination with terbinafine, mainly a synergistic or additive reaction was observed; there were no cases of antagonism. For ciclopirox in combination with itraconazole, there were some instances of additivism or synergism, with indifference in the majority of instances; there were no cases of antagonism. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro susceptibility testing indicates that ciclopirox may have a broad antimicrobial profile including dermatophytes, yeasts and other nondermatophytes. Terbinafine is extremely potent against dermatophytes. In vitro evaluation of activity of ciclopirox and terbinafine suggests many instances of synergy or additivism; for ciclopirox and itraconazole there may be indifference, synergy or additivism.

Antifungal Agents↗

Dermatophytes: recognizing species of clonal fungi.

Now that molecular data have forever changed our perspective on the anthropophilic and zoophilic dermatophyte species, the concepts of these species needs re-evaluation. In this paper, main concepts (morphological, biological (BSC), phylogenetic and genealogical concordance phylogenetic species recognition (GCPSR)) are compared. While in geophilic dermatophytes the application of the BSC works well for species distinction and is supported by molecular data, it is not applicable for the anthropophilic and zoophilic dermatophytes where the majority of species reproduce purely asexually. Also, the application of GCPSR (an operational method to define the limits of species using molecular, multi-locus data) is problematic. GCPSR can be applied in recombining fungi even when recombination is infrequent and fungi lack phenotypic sexuality. In truly clonal fungi, however, no incongruities in multi-locus data are found, and thus separation of species may be difficult. In fungi this problem is currently taken to be non-existent, since clonality is supposed to lead to extinction. In the medically relevant, host-associated dermatophytes, however, is reason to suggest that clonal dermatophyte lineages are able to maintain ongoing populations and to follow independent evolutionary trajectories. We distinguish seasonal, short-lived and long-lived clonal species. The final goal of a species concept, in the dermatophytes as well as in other fungi, is to provide a taxonomic system that reflects the evolution of the fungal species so that the underlying biological trends elucidated in this way may be brought forward to help to guide the clinician in applying optimal therapy and prophylaxis. The application of the different species concepts may have an enormous impact on the nomenclature of dermatophytes, directly affecting the quality of communications with care providers.

Arthrodermataceae↗

Demonstration of dermatophyte dissemination from the infected soles using the foot-press method.

We have designed a new direct isolation method, the foot-press method, to survey dissemination of dermatophytes from the infected soles. A total of 56 untreated patients with tinea pedis were examined. The infected soles of 42 patients were pressed onto actidione-chloramphenicol-5-fluorocytosine (5FC)-gentamicin sulphate Sabouraud glucose medium prepared in a large culture dish; the culture media were then incubated at 25 degrees C. Dermatophytes were isolated in 30 out of the 42 patients, while no dermatophytes could be grown from 10 healthy controls. The number of isolated colonies from each patient ranged from 1 to 97 (mean +/- SD, 11 +/- 20). The isolation frequencies were higher in the patients of hyperkeratotic type and in those with tinea unguium, while causative organisms and the extent of the lesions did not affect the results of the footpress method significantly. In order to reveal the morphology of disseminated dermatophytes, 1 x 1 cm pieces of culture media were cut out from culture dishes after pressing infected soles and were examined microscopically. Dermatophyte-like spores or hyphae, most of which were detached from cornified cells, could be seen in 10 out of 14 patients. Subsequently performed slide cultures isolated dermatophytes from approximately 70% of the pieces on which dermatophyte-like fungi were observed.

Adult↗

Human dermatophyte-responsive T-cell lines recognize cross-reactive antigens associated with mannose-rich glycoproteins.

Resistance to dermatophyte infections has been shown to be mediated in part by T lymphocytes. The dermatophyte antigens recognized by human T lymphocytes and their degree of cross-reactivity were analyzed. Dermatophyte-responsive T-cell lines were generated by in vitro sensitization to crude fungal extracts obtained from Trichophyton rubrum, Trichophyton tonsurans, Microsporum canis and Epidermophyton floccosum. Proliferation was measured by incorporation of 3H-thymidine. The human T-cell lines responded to fungal extracts derived from these various dermatophyte species, demonstrating the recognition of cross-reactive antigens by human T cells. However, the T cells were dermatophyte-specific as they did not respond to herpes antigen, nor did herpes-specific T cells derived from the same donors respond to dermatophyte antigens. The mannose-rich glycoprotein fraction (mannan) isolated from T. rubrum was able to induce proliferation of T-cell lines generated by stimulation with various fungal extracts. Furthermore, a T-cell line generated by stimulation with mannan derived from T. rubrum proliferated in response to extracts from various fungal species, indicating that a major cross-reactive dermatophyte T-cell antigen was present in the mannose-rich glycoprotein fraction.

Adult↗

Intra- and interlaboratory study of a method for testing the antifungal susceptibilities of dermatophytes.

The National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) M38-A standard for the susceptibility testing of conidium-forming filamentous fungi does not explicitly address the testing of dermatophytes. This multicenter study, involving six laboratories, investigated the MIC reproducibility of seven antifungal agents tested against 25 dermatophyte isolates (5 blinded pairs of five dermatophyte species per site for a total of 300 tests), using the method of dermatophyte testing developed at the Center for Medical Mycology, Cleveland, Ohio. The dermatophytes tested included Trichophyton rubrum, Trichophyton mentagrophytes, Trichophyton tonsurans, Epidermophyton floccosum, and Microsporum canis. Seven antifungals with activity against dermatophytes were tested, including ciclopirox, fluconazole, griseofulvin, itraconazole, posaconazole, terbinafine, and voriconazole. Interlaboratory MICs for all isolates were in 92 to 100% agreement at a visual endpoint reading of 50% inhibition as compared to the growth control and 88 to 99% agreement at a visual endpoint reading of 80% inhibition as compared to the growth control. Intralaboratory MICs between blinded pairs were in 97% agreement at a visual endpoint reading of 50% inhibition as compared to the growth control and 96% agreement at a visual endpoint reading of 80% inhibition as compared to the growth control. Data from this study support consideration of this method as an amendment to the NCCLS M38-A standard for the testing of dermatophytes.

Antifungal Agents↗

Identification of carbon dioxide as a dermatophyte inhibitory factor produced by Candida albicans.

A factor produced by Candida albicans, which inhibits dermatophyte growth and induces arthrospore formation is characterized and identified. Candida dermatophyte inhibitory factor (CDIF) is volatile and fungistatic. Analysis of volatile materials produced by C. albicans was subsequently identified as carbon dioxide. The involvement of carbon dioxide in the inhibition of dermatophytes was demonstrated by: (1) utilization of commercial carbon dioxide to produce dermatophyte inhibition as well as arthrospore formation, and (2) prevention of dermatophyte inhibition by C. albicans through incoporation of soda lime into the incubation atmosphere. The ability of carbon dioxide to inhibit dermatophyte growth was shared with other gases (methane and helium), but arthrospore formation was observed only with carbon dioxide. The possible significance of carbon dioxide's induction of arthrospores, a form occasionally observed in active dermatophyte lesions, is discussed.

Antifungal Agents↗