SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “multidisciplinary team”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed1999

Training health professionals: a multidisciplinary team approach in a university-based weight-loss program.

In a university-based weight-loss program for preadolescent girls, a multidisciplinary team delivered the intervention. The team included a nurse/health educator, an exercise physiologist, a psychologist, five dietitians, and 17 dietetics, nursing, and medical students, The six-month program provided 12 educational sessions in nutrition, stress management, behavior modification, and exercise. Concurrent sessions for parents addressed comparable educational topics and parenting skills. Dietitians and student research assistants (n = 19) were surveyed regarding their participation on a multidisciplinary team and their acquisition of new knowledge/skills. The survey included both open-ended questions and Likert-type statements. Results indicate that participation enhanced knowledge of nutrition counseling/education (chi = 1.6) as well as appreciation for research (chi = 1.8) and for the multidisciplinary team approach (chi = 1.7). Qualitative data reinforce the benefits of the multidisciplinary experience and multiskill training. Exercise, stress management, parenting skills, and psychological techniques were perceived as important skills to develop for professional careers.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMed1999

Radiation therapy of metastatic spinal cord compression. Multidisciplinary team diagnosis and treatment.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary approach to spinal cord compression (SCC) in accordance with prospective protocol, providing a uniform approach to diagnosis, decision making concerning optimal treatment modality in any particular case of SCC, treatment performance and evaluation of treatment results. The SCC patients treated by radiation therapy are described. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with SCC were examined and treated by a multidisciplinary team consisting of a neurologist, radiologist, oncologist, orthopedic surgeon, and neurosurgeon. Seventy-nine patients for whom radiation was recommended received a 30 Gy radiation dose to a compression-causing mass and course of high dose dexamethasone. Three fractions of 5 Gy and 5 fractions 3 Gy each were delivered by Co60 or 8 MV photon beam in 12 days. Treatment outcome was essentially evaluated by ambulation capabilities which were considered to be the main problem of SCC. Changes in other neurologic motor, sensory and autonomic disturbances were also evaluated. RESULTS: Seventy-two percent of the patients were already non-ambulatory at diagnosis. The first symptom was motor deficiency in only 33% of them while in all other cases it was pain. Ambulation capability was the main prognosticator of treatment outcome; 90% of patients who were ambulatory before treatment remained so while 33% of the non-ambulatory patients regained their ability to walk. The grade of motor disturbance was also an important variable: among the non-ambulatory patients, 50% of the paretic but only 14% of the plegic ones became ambulatory. Overall, 51% of the study patients were ambulatory after undergoing radiation. The ambulatory state after treatment was the main predictor for survival. CONCLUSION: Close cooperation of a multidisciplinary team in diagnosis and treatment according to the above protocol enabled the achievement of good results of radiation treatment in SCC. Early diagnosis and early treatment should further enhance therapeutic outcome.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Do all health and social care professionals interact equally: a study of interactions in multidisciplinary teams in the United Kingdom.

Problems around deficits in interprofessional collaboration have been identified since the National Health Service (NHS) was introduced. It is within the context of the current policy focus on improving collaborative working that this study was undertaken. A direct observational study using the Bales' Interaction Process Analysis tool was carried out in two older persons teams to explore patterns of interaction in the multidisciplinary team meetings. Analysis revealed some key differences in the way in which different professions interacted. Occupational therapists, physiotherapists, social workers (SW) and nurses rarely asked for opinions and for orientation. The consultant (the individual in charge of the medical team) tended to have high rates for asking for orientation, giving opinions and giving orientation. Although some nurses did have high individual rates for the giving of orientation. The data from the research has highlighted that therapists, SWs and nurses are reluctance to voice their opinions in multidisciplinary teams and thus conformity may dominate its culture. It is suggested that therapists, SWs and nurses need to cite their opinions in teams more effectively if they are to be competent and committed patient-centred practitioners.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMed1997

Efficacy of multidisciplinary team care programs in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of multidisciplinary team care programs in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Data were obtained by a Medline and a manual search of the literature through January 1997. Both the design and analysis aspects of controlled trials were evaluated. RESULTS: Forty-two papers reporting on 35 clinical trials of multidisciplinary team care were initially identified. Fifteen trials had a controlled design, nine of which were randomized. Patient characteristics, interventions, end point measures, and presentation of the data varied widely among the controlled studies. In 12 trials, inpatient (n = 6) or outpatient (n = 6) multidisciplinary programs were compared with regular outpatient care. Inpatient programs (average duration, 10 to 28 days) had a direct favorable effect on disease activity, lasting up to 1 year. The effect of outpatient programs (average duration, 1 to 2 years) was less marked, with greater improvement of functional status at the end of the treatment program shown in one study. In three trials, inpatient multidisciplinary programs were compared with similar outpatient programs. One study showed that inpatient care was more effective, whereas in two studies similar results were obtained in both groups. CONCLUSION: Favorable effects on disease activity were seen in most trials comparing short inpatient team care with regular outpatient care. Proof of efficacy of prolonged outpatient team care is scanty. Results of trials comparing inpatient with outpatient team care remain inconclusive.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗

PubMed2005

A novel back school using a multidisciplinary team approach featuring quantitative functional evaluation and therapeutic exercises for patients with chronic low back pain: the Japanese experience in the general setting.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To introduce a novel back school for the treatment of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP), and to report its clinical results. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although back school is one of the treatment methods for patients with CLBP, its efficacy and appropriate style remain controversial. No studies have been published regarding the combined program of back school with a multidisciplinary team approach. METHODS: A total of 182 patients with CLBP (74 men and 108 women; average age, 43.8 years) participated in this study. All patients were enrolled in the back school using a multidisciplinary team approach featuring quantitative functional evaluation and therapeutic exercises. The following outcome measures were evaluated at the baseline, and 6 and 12 months after the enrollment: the level of pain evaluated with a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), flexibility of trunk and hamstrings (finger-floor distance, straight leg raising), trunk muscle strength and endurance, frequency of therapeutic exercises, and self-reported patient satisfaction. RESULTS: An averaged VAS score was 6.2 before enrollment in the program and 2.8 at follow-up. The pain improved in 141 patients (80.8%), did not change in 27 (15.4%), and was aggravated in 7 (3.8%). There was statistically significant improvement of finger-floor distance, trunk muscle strength, and endurance in the patients whose pain was relieved after enrollment in the program (P < 0.05). The compliance with the exercise program was significantly correlated with the clinical results (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We developed a novel back school using a multidisciplinary team approach, featuring quantitative functional evaluation and therapeutic exercises. The current study demonstrated that our program could provide a satisfactory result for the treatment of patients with CLBP. The quantitative functional evaluation was a worthwhile outcome measure when evaluating the efficacy of the treatment program. Teaching body mechanics and performing the therapeutic exercises through the multidisciplinary team approach are essential to managing CLBP in a general setting.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Multidisciplinary team renal rehabilitation: interventions and outcomes.

Multidisciplinary team renal rehabilitation produces positive patient outcomes by broadening the knowledge base and evening out the work load. Rehabilitation is no longer viewed as an extra program to patient care done by a few people but seen as an integral part of the patients' care and dialysis treatment. Focusing on the 5E's of renal rehabilitation developed by the Life Options Rehabilitation Advisory Council, Renal Care Group of the Midwest, Inc has achieved positive clinical patient outcomes, such as meeting dialysis adequacy benchmark goals. Interventions and outcomes of two of the 5E's, education and exercise, are discussed.

Exercise Therapy↗

PubMed2002

Virtual multidisciplinary teams for cancer care.

A recent report on cancer services in Wales recommended an integrated cancer service. The proposed model was difficult to introduce in rural areas, where health-care sites and staff are far apart. Videoconferencing equipment was installed in the Singleton Hospital, Swansea, and the Bronglais General Hospital, Aberystwyth, 120 km away. During the first year, 42 videoconferencing multidisciplinary team meetings were held using ISDN at 384 kbit/s. A total of 202 cases were reviewed. The cancers were colorectal, breast and lung. There was only one aborted session, which was due to an ISDN line fault. The average attendance at the meetings was 15 staff, of whom eight were essential team members. Regular multidisciplinary team meetings reduced the need for patients to travel. They also increased access to expert opinion and reduced the delay in implementing treatment.

Cancer Care Facilities↗

PubMed2002

HIV multidisciplinary teams work: support services improve access to and retention in HIV primary care.

The multidisciplinary team model of HIV care evolved out of necessity due to the diverse characteristics and needs of people living with HIV disease. Though it is now accepted as the international standard of care, it represents a significant departure from methods of care for other infectious diseases, and debate continues regarding the effectiveness of its interventions. The debate has been largely uninformed by data; for example, little is known about the relationship between ancillary support services and primary care outcomes. We hypothesized that support services increase access to and retention in HIV primary care in an inner city public hospital clinic. We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical data sets on 2,647 patients at the CORE Center, Chicago from 1997-1998 to investigate the relationship between four support services-case management (CM), transportation (TRANS), mental health (MH) and chemical dependency (CD)-and access to and retention in HIV primary care. We found that patients who received each of these services were significantly more likely to receive any care, regular care and had more visits than patients with no service, and retention increased by 15-18%. Female gender, younger age, self-pay status and IDU predicted less regular care. Need for all services was substantial and significantly greater in women. Outcomes improved to the greatest extent among patients who needed and received each service. We conclude that support services significantly increased access to and retention in HIV primary care. Our findings validate the multidisciplinary team model of HIV care, and suggest that health services that are tailored to the express needs of patients lead to better care and improved health outcomes. Further testing of changes in health care delivery to meet the rapidly changing needs of people living with HIV disease and respond to the constantly changing practice of HIV medicine is urgently needed to maintain and extend the advances in HIV care outcomes of the past decade.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2007

Results of a survey of the role of multidisciplinary team coordinators for colorectal cancer in England and Wales.

OBJECTIVE: Over the last 6 years, multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) have been established and play a key role in organizing the delivery of cancer care in the UK. There are no published data on the roles of their co-coordinators. To seek the views of colorectal multidisciplinary team co-ordinators (MDTCs) on what they do and how they do it. METHOD: Questionnaires were sent to the colorectal MDTC, or equivalent, in all 180 NHS hospital trusts in England and Wales where colorectal cancer surgery is performed. RESULTS: There was a 70% response rate. Seventy-one per cent of trusts now have a dedicated MDTC, whereas in 2002, only 40% had one. MDTCs generally keep their information on databases, but these differ, and are not coordinated with data entry into the national colorectal cancer database of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland. In only 26 trusts does the MDTC communicate decisions to primary care, and the patients seem almost completely excluded from this process. CONCLUSION: The recently formed national MDTC Forum should grasp the opportunity of coordinating all of this well-intentioned but pluralistic activity to the benefit of patients, primary care and hospital teams. An effective MDTC with a robust database will be the key in achieving cancer waiting time targets with useful audit, thereby improving patient care.

Chi-Square Distribution↗

PubMed1989

Role of the nurse in the multidisciplinary team approach to care of liver transplant patients.

Nursing plays an important contributory role in the multidisciplinary team approach to patient care. The nurse who is responsible for the care of liver transplant patients requires special preparation to meet the patient's needs during the critical phases of the liver transplant process. In the hospital setting, a primary nursing-care delivery system enhances the nurse's role in supporting the goal of patient recovery. Primary nursing places the accountability and responsibility for planning, administering, and evaluating the care of the liver transplant patient with the primary nurse. The transplant nurse acts as a key link in the communication network within the multidisciplinary team, and effective communication is essential in the care of the liver transplant patient. For achievement of a life-style of independence after transplantation, the patient is assisted by the nurse, who provides instruction in such areas as diet, medications, monitoring of vital signs, and record keeping. Although the nurse is only one member contributing to the care of liver transplant patients, the nurse's role in the success of treatment is vital.

Communication↗

PubMed1998

The impact of regular multidisciplinary team interventions on psychotropic prescribing in Swedish nursing homes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of regular multidisciplinary team interventions on the quantity and quality of psychotropic drug prescribing in Swedish nursing homes. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. SETTING: A sample of 33 nursing homes: 15 experimental homes and 18 control homes representing 5% of all Swedish nursing homes. PARTICIPANTS: The sample consisted of 1854 long-term care residents with an average age of 83 years. Seventy percent of the residents were women, and 42% had a documented diagnosis of dementia. An additional 5% had a psychotic disorder, and 7% had a diagnosis of depression. INTERVENTION: Experimental homes participated in an outreach program that was designed to influence drug use through improved teamwork among physicians, pharmacists, nurses, and nurses' assistants. Multidisciplinary team meetings were held on a regular basis throughout the 12-month study period. MEASUREMENTS: Lists of each resident's prescriptions were collected 1 month before and 1 month after the 12-month intervention. Measures included the proportion of residents with any psychotropic drug, polymedicine, and therapeutic duplication and proportion of residents with nonrecommended and acceptable drugs in each psychotropic drug class, as defined by current Swedish guidelines. RESULTS: Baseline results show extensive psychotropic drug prescribing, with the most commonly prescribed drugs being hypnotics (40%), anxiolytics (40%), and antipsychotics (38%). After 12 months of team meetings in the experimental homes, there was a significant decrease in the prescribing of psychotics (-19%), benzodiazepine hypnotics (-37%), and antidepressants (-59%). Orders for more acceptable antidepressants also increased in the experimental homes. In the control homes there was increased use of acceptable antidepressants, but there were no significant reductions in other drug classes. CONCLUSIONS: There is excessive prescription of psychotropic drugs in Swedish nursing homes. Improved teamwork among caregivers can improve prescribing as defined by clinical guidelines.

Aged↗

PubMed1991

The effect of a multidisciplinary team approach on weight gain in nonorganic failure-to-thrive children.

Failure-to-thrive (FTT) is a chronic symptom accounting for 1% of all patients admitted to pediatric hospitals. FTT, which is traditionally attributed to organic (OFTT) and/or nonorganic (NFTT) causes, results in undernutrition. Undernutrition has potentially serious effects on child development, behavior, and cognitive skills. We undertook a study of children with FTT to determine whether multidisciplinary team treatment resulted in improved weight gain compared with children treated in a primary care setting. Fifty-three children with NFTT referred to our outpatient FTT consultative clinic and 107 children with NFTT identified as comparison subjects from our primary care clinic (PCC) were enrolled in the study. Growth outcomes over a 6-month follow-up were analyzed using growth quotient (GQ) analysis. Children followed in the multidisciplinary team clinic grew better (GQ = 1.75 +/- 0.39 SD) than did children in the PCC (GQ = 1.18 +/- 0.42 SD, p less than .001). The use of a multidisciplinary team offers special advantages in the rapid correction of undernutrition in children with NFTT.

Child, Preschool↗

PubMed1998

Psychosocial rehabilitation nurses: taking our place on the multidisciplinary team.

Nurses have been working in the AMI/ABLE ISA for the past 6 years as part of a multidisciplinary team. The nursing contribution is important to the Team, not only because of nursing expertise in providing psychiatric mental health care, but also because nurses can provide services unique to nursing, such as health assessments and education, and medication support (Fur-long-Norman, Palmer-Erbs, & Jonikas, 1997). More than 80 people who are disabled by mental illnesses have been served by this innovative program since 1991, and members' hospitalization rates have been cut approximately in half by integrating services and reducing fragmentation, and by using aggressive outreach and a psychosocial rehabilitation approach. Psychosocial rehabilitation nursing has become a subspecialty that has expanded the profession. Experience in the AMI/ABLE program demonstrates that nurses, as fully integrated members of multidisciplinary teams, adapt to working in partnerships with clients and their families, in nontraditional settings.

California↗

PubMed2006

The use of multidisciplinary teams to evaluate bariatric surgery patients: results from a national survey in the U.S.A.

BACKGROUND: The degree to which U.S. bariatric surgeons use multidisciplinary methods to evaluate patients is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a national survey of practising bariatric surgeons, mailed in 3 waves from September-December 2004, to describe and determine predictors of surgeons' approach to the multidisciplinary evaluation of prospective bariatric surgery patients. Multivariate analyses were performed to determine patterns and predictors of multidisciplinary methods. RESULTS: The response rate was 62% (813/1,312). Although 95% of respondents reported using a multidisciplinary team, only 53% had a general physician, nutritionist, and mental health specialist (NIH-recommended team). Just 47% mandated primary care, nutrition, and mental health evaluations (NIH-recommended evaluations). Practice type, size, and location as well as membership in the American Society for Bariatric Surgery did not influence these outcomes. General surgery board certification reduced the odds of having an NIH-recommended team (OR=0.56, 95%CI 0.35-0.92). Practicing bariatric surgery for >8 years decreased the odds of reported multidisciplinary team use (OR=0.29, 95%CI 0.10-0.82) and requiring NIH-recommended evaluations (OR=0.36, 95%CI 0.24-0.53). Medium volume surgeons had increased odds of reporting use of a team (OR=2.96, 95%CI 1.22-7.18) and decreased odds of requiring NIH-recommended evaluations (OR=0.65, 95%CI 0.44-0.92). CONCLUSION: Inconsistent and unpredictable patterns of multidisciplinary methods were found. Further research should explore the impact of different methods on outcomes. New policies should detail a minimum standard for the multidisciplinary evaluation of bariatric surgery patients. Health professionals across disciplines are needed to assist surgeons in evaluating prospective bariatric surgery patients.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Multidisciplinary team working: is it both holistic and effective?

Multidisciplinary team (MDT) working has been endorsed as the main mechanism to ensure truly holistic care for patients and a seamless service for patients throughout their disease trajectory and across the boundaries of primary, secondary, and tertiary care. However the effectiveness of each team needs to be continually evaluated to ensure that all the relevant disciplines are able to participate in the clinical management of patients. This article describes the work of the Cancer Services Collaborative at the Birmingham Women's hospital in the UK in promoting the development of a holistic MDT in parallel with the medical model.

Continuity of Patient Care↗

PubMed2001

A multidisciplinary team approach to skull base chordomas.

OBJECT: A multidisciplinary team devised a protocol for long-term care of patients with skull base chordomas. In this study they describe their approach. METHODS: Forty-two patients presented between 1986 and 1998 and were treated by maximum surgical cytoreduction and photon radiation therapy. Tumor volume-doubling time determined on the basis of magnetic resonance imaging, immunostaining, and cell proliferation (Ki67 labeling index [LI]) studies indicated growth rates of individual chordomas. The best outlook was associated with the greatest extent of tumor removal achieved during the first operation. There were no deaths associated with patients who underwent first-time surgery, but there was a 7.1% mortality rate associated with those who underwent subsequent operations. Cerebrospinal fluid leaks, additional cranial nerve palsies, and pharyngeal wound problems were the most difficult management problems encountered after second and subsequent surgeries. The time interval between operations was usually between 2 years and 3 years after the first surgery; very few patients required a second surgery, with a quiescent period in excess of 5 years. Life-table 5- and 10-year survival rates were 77% and 69%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The authors believe that this series of skull base chordomas provides new insights into the management of these lesions, particularly with regard to techniques that increase survival times and studies that aid in formulating prognoses.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1995

A controlled clinical trial of multidisciplinary team approach in the general medical wards of Chulalongkorn Hospital.

The benefits and acceptability of a strengthened physician-nurse collaboration and a multidisciplinary team approach are demonstrated in the medical wards of a Thai acute-care hospital (Chulalongkorn University Hospital). The strengthened physician-nurse collaboration should be introduced or strengthened in all medical wards. Because of the lack of appropriately trained personnel, concentrating resources into a small unit or ward may be the appropriate measure at present if a multidisciplinary team approach is to be integrated into the medical ward of acute-care hospitals in South East Asia.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Multidisciplinary team management is associated with improved outcomes after surgery for esophageal cancer.

We aim to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing R0 esophagectomy by a multidisciplinary team (MDT) with outcomes after surgery alone performed by surgeons working independently in a UK cancer unit. An historical control group of 77 consecutive patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer and undergoing surgery with curative intent by six general surgeons between 1991 and 1997 (54 R0 esophagectomies) were compared with a group of 67 consecutive patients managed by the MDT between 1998 and 2003 (53 R0 esophagectomies, 26 patients received multimodal therapy). The proportion of patients undergoing open and closed laparotomy and thoracotomy decreased from 21% and 5%, respectively, in control patients, to 13% and 0% in MDT patients (chi2 = 11.90, DF = 1, P = 0.001; chi2 = 5.45, DF = 1, P = 0.02 respectively). MDT patients had lower operative mortality (5.7%vs. 26%; chi2 = 8.22, DF = 1, P = 0.004) than control patients, and were more likely to survive 5 years (52%vs. 10%, chi2 = 15.05, P = 0.0001). In a multivariate analysis, MDT management (HR = 0.337, 95% CI = 0.201-0.564, P < 0.001), lymph node metastases (HR = 1.728, 95% CI = 1.070-2.792, P = 0.025), and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade (HR = 2.207, 95% CI = 1.412-3.450, P = 0.001) were independently associated with duration of survival. Multidisciplinary team management and surgical subspecialization improved outcomes after surgery significantly for patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗