SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “robotic surgery”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2004

Robotic surgery in urology: fact or fantasy?

Advanced robotic surgery was first introduced into urology in 2000. The first studies showed the feasibility and safety of the daVinci (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) telemanipulator assistance in radical prostatectomy, pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction, and radical cystectomy and neobladder formation. The miniature endowristed tools offer a potential advantage over standard laparoscopy in the accuracy of preparation and suturing. Other features are a three-dimensional vision system and unimpaired hand-eye coordination. Complex laparoscopic tasks are learned faster by using the robot, which may also explain the shorter training required for radical prostatectomy than for manual laparoscopy. This new and expensive technology has spread rapidly over the last 4 years. By 2004, approximately 10% of radical prostatectomies in the USA will be robot-assisted. Data on the functional and oncological outcomes are accruing but not yet conclusive. There will be a further spread of robotic surgery, routine telesurgery, smaller and more affordable systems, the introduction of virtual reality, all developments which have the potential to urological surgeons to improve.

Costs and Cost Analysis↗

PubMed2006

The 'scrubbed surgeon' in robotic surgery.

One of the principal reasons for the rapid progress of robotic surgery has been its advantage in allowing laparoscopy naïve surgeons to offer minimal access surgery to their patients. While this may continue to be an advantage of this modality, it has to be remembered that this has often been possible primarily due to the availability of an assistant who has at least basic laparoscopy skills that permit the performance of critical patient side tasks. We review the literature on the role of the assistant or the 'scrubbed surgeon' in robotic surgery and discuss the advantages of a properly trained assistant in a developing and established robotic surgery program.

Clinical Competence↗

PubMed2005

Maintenance of hemostasis in transoral robotic surgery.

BACKGROUND: The last decade has seen a tremendous growth in the field of robotic surgery with an increasing number of cardiac and urologic procedures performed each year. Several attributes of this technology may offer advantages to laryngeal and pharyngeal surgery in that it allows for exceptional visualization of the operative field, precise handling of soft tissues, and multiplanar transection of tissues. One potential limitation is the management of bleeding in transoral pharyngeal and laryngeal surgery, which is critical to prevent both intravascular volume loss and aspiration. OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate methods for management of bleeding in the surgical field during transoral robotic surgery (TORS). METHODS: We developed a canine robotic surgery model for the evaluation of the ability to control bleeding in laryngeal and pharyngeal procedures using the daVinci surgical robot (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, Calif., USA). Both large- and small-vessel hemostasis was obtained with both robotically controlled monopolar and bipolar cautery and with robotically controlled small hemoclips. Additionally, manually controlled large hemoclips were applied by an assistant surgeon viewing on a video monitor for management of large arterial vessels. Suction was performed with both flexible suction catheters controlled by the robotic arms and with manually controlled conventional suction catheters. Data were collected with still and video photography. RESULTS: The lingual artery as well as small arteries and veins were easily controlled and there were no difficulties with maintenance of hemostasis. CONCLUSIONS: Effective hemostasis with control of both large and small vessels can be obtained using both surgical hemoclips and electrocautery during TORS in a canine model.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Teaching robotic surgery: a stepwise approach.

BACKGROUND: After an initial institutional experience with 50 robot-assisted laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedures, a curriculum was developed for fellowship training in robotic surgery. METHODS: Thirty consecutive robotic gastric bypasses were performed using the Zeus robotic surgical system to fashion a two-layer gastrojejunostomy. For teaching purposes, performance of the anastomosis was divided into three discrete tasks. Robotic suturing tasks were assigned to the trainee in cumulative order in ten-case increments. Our patient population averaged 44 years of age and 47 kg/m(2) in BMI. Patients were predominantly female (87%). RESULTS: The robotic training experience of the fellow defines the increases in surgical responsibility over the series of cases. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in task times or total robotic operative time as participation of the trainee in performing the gastrojejunostomy increased. No adverse robotic events or surgical complications occurred throughout this series. The learning curve of the fellow compared favorably with the initial experience of the institution. CONCLUSION: Robotic surgery training may be safely implemented in a minimally invasive surgery training program. A gradual introduction of robotic technique appears to maximize the learning experience and minimize the potential for adverse outcomes.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Robotic surgery: a current perspective.

OBJECTIVE: To review the history, development, and current applications of robotics in surgery. BACKGROUND: Surgical robotics is a new technology that holds significant promise. Robotic surgery is often heralded as the new revolution, and it is one of the most talked about subjects in surgery today. Up to this point in time, however, the drive to develop and obtain robotic devices has been largely driven by the market. There is no doubt that they will become an important tool in the surgical armamentarium, but the extent of their use is still evolving. METHODS: A review of the literature was undertaken using Medline. Articles describing the history and development of surgical robots were identified as were articles reporting data on applications. RESULTS: Several centers are currently using surgical robots and publishing data. Most of these early studies report that robotic surgery is feasible. There is, however, a paucity of data regarding costs and benefits of robotics versus conventional techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic surgery is still in its infancy and its niche has not yet been well defined. Its current practical uses are mostly confined to smaller surgical procedures.

Cardiac Surgical Procedures↗

PubMed2006

Robotic surgery for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Robotic surgery for ureteropelvic junction obstruction is an evolving technique. We review the current literature related to this technique and discuss the current technique and outcomes of robotic pyeloplasty. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent advances in robotic-assisted surgery have allowed the successful completion of complex reconstructive procedures in the pediatric population, including the robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty can be performed by either a transperitoneal or a retroperitoneal approach. Overall, the procedure is safe, efficacious, and may have particular benefits over open surgery. SUMMARY: The evolution of laparoscopic surgery in pediatric urology has been limited by the challenge of laparoscopic suturing. Robotic systems may offer the means to overcome this major impediment of laparoscopic surgery. The results of this review demonstrate that robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty is safe, technically feasible, and efficacious in the pediatric population, and may be comparable to a contemporary series of open pyeloplasty. As the technology continues to evolve, the efficiency of the robotic system is likely to improve; however, the ultimate role of robotic-assisted or computer-assisted surgical systems remains unclear. To further determine the role of robotic systems in the management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction, rigorous prospective research is needed that combines surgical and technical outcomes with overall subjective or cosmetic outcome and economic analysis.

Humans↗

PubMed1997

Active compliance in robotic surgery--the use of force control as a dynamic constraint.

Robotic surgery can be carried out automatically by using a robot to move the cutting tool under position control. However, although the surgeon can observe the procedure on a visual display and has the ability to stop the operation in an emergency, he has little direct contact with the task. An alternative approach is to involve the surgeon more directly, by his moving a robot using active force control. The robot is then used to allow motion in preprogrammed regions, by the surgeon back-driving the robot motors, while preventing motion in prohibited areas. This active constraint robot (or ACROBOT) is described in this paper applied to knee surgery, in which the knee bones are accurately machined to allow the fitting of prosthetic knee implants. The ACROBOT is, however, ideally suited to a range of surgical procedure, because it allows the surgeon to feel the forces exerted during cutting and take appropriate action. This ability to be in direct control, while being constrained to cut within a permitted region, enhances safety and makes the system more acceptable to the medical community. The system of programmable constraint also allows the ACROBOT to provide the traditional benefits of robot surgery, namely the ability to machine complex geometrical surfaces very accurately and to make repetitive motions tirelessly. The system also has a potential for minimally invasive procedures. In knee surgery, for example, the robot could operate through a small incision in the skin and excise a volume into which a small, specially designed, unicompartmental prosthesis could fit.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee↗

PubMed2004

Robotic surgery update.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgical techniques have revolutionized the field of surgery. Telesurgical manipulators (robots) and new information technologies strive to improve upon currently available minimally invasive techniques and create new possibilities. METHODS: A retrospective review of all robotic cases at a single academic medical center from August 2000 until November 2002 was conducted. A comprehensive literature evaluation on robotic surgical technology was also performed. RESULTS: Robotic technology is safely and effectively being applied at our institution. Robotic and information technologies have improved upon minimally invasive surgical techniques and created new opportunities not attainable in open surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic technology offers many benefits over traditional minimal access techniques and has been proven safe and effective. Further research is needed to better define the optimal application of this technology. Credentialing and educational requirements also need to be delineated.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed2002

Robotic surgery: the computer-enhanced control of surgical instruments.

Robotic procedures are still in a developmental stage. Studies have shown that many operations can be performed safely with computer-enhanced telemanipulators, but distinct advantages of robotic procedures have not been established. Before third-party payors begin paying a premium for the use of a robot, costs will need to decrease or outcomes will need to be sufficiently better. Manufacturers of robotic surgery systems are marketing directly to consumers and promoting their systems to hospitals based on the number of patients that can be attracted by such programs. Only the acceptance of robotics into mainstream surgical practice, however, will prove it to be more than just a niche technology.

Endoscopy↗

PubMed2004

Optimizing motion scaling and magnification in robotic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Motion scaling is one possible advantage of robotic surgery. The aim of this study was to determine which scaling optimized precision and speed at different magnifications. METHODS: Three levels of motion scaling were tested at each of 3 camera magnifications. Surgically nave subjects (n = 12) were randomized as to the order of magnification level testing (3.5x, 6.5x, 9.5x) and motion scalings (10:1, 5:1, 1:1). The subjects were asked to pierce a needle through 6 printed microtargets; then accuracy and drill completion time were scored. RESULTS: At 3.5x magnification, no differences between groups were observed. At 6.5x magnification, the 5:1 scaling was superior to the 1:1 scaling in total errors, and the 10:1 scaling was significantly slower. At 9.5x magnification, 10:1 scaling resulted in fewer errors than 1:1 with no difference in time. Overall, the 10:1 and 5:1 scalings resulted in fewer errors. The 5:1 scaling resulted in less drill completion time than the 10:1 scaling. The 9.5x magnification resulted in the fewest errors. CONCLUSIONS: Motion scaling reduces the number of errors at higher magnifications, but can increase the task completion time. It is necessary to optimize both the motion scaling and magnification components of robotic systems to balance precision and speed.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Robotic surgery: urologic implications.

Current medical robots have nothing in common with the anthropomorphic robots in science fiction classics. They are in fact, manipulators, working on a master-slave principle. Robots can be defined as "automatically controlled multitask manipulators, which are freely programmable in three or more spaces." The success of robots in surgery is based on their precision, lack of fatigue, and speed of action. This review describes the theory, advantages, disadvantages, and clinical utilization of mechanical and robotic arm systems to replace the second assistant and provide camera direction and stability during laparoscopic surgery. The Robotrac system (Aesculap, Burlingame, CA), the First Assistant (Leonard Medical Inc, Huntingdon Valley, PA), AESOP (Computer Motion, Goleta, CA), ZEUS (Computer Motion), and the da Vinci (Intuitive Surgical, Mountain View, CA) system are reviewed, as are simple mechanical-assist systems such as Omnitract (Minnesota Scientific, St. Paul, MN), Iron Intern (Automated Medical Products Corp., New York, NY), the Bookwalter retraction system (Codman , Somerville, NJ), the Surgassistant trade mark (Solos Endoscopy, Irvine, CA), the Trocar Sleeve Stabilizer (Richard Wolf Medical Instruments Corp., Rosemont, IL), and the Endoholder (Codman, Somerville, NJ).

Equipment Design↗

PubMed2002

Early experiences of robotic surgery in children.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery using a robotic system (Da Vinci) was recently introduced into surgical practice for adult patients. To investigate the feasibility of this system in pediatric surgery, laparoscopic fundoplication (Thal and Nissen), cholecystectomy, and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were performed. METHODS: Eleven children with a mean age of 12 years (range, 7-16 years) underwent either laparoscopic anterior partial fundoplication (Thal, n = 8) or Nissen fundoplication (n = 3) for correction of gastroesophageal reflux disease in the presence of uncontrolled symptoms of regurgitation and pulmonary infection. Two children underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. One child underwent bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy due to a gonadoblastoma. RESULTS: Mean operating time for fundoplication was 146 min (range, 105-180 min), the operating times for cholecystectomy were 150 and 105 min, and that for salpingo-oophorectomy was 95 min. No complications were registered during either the robotic procedures or the postoperative courses. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to conventional laparoscopy, the three-dimensional high-quality vision, advanced instrument movement, and improved ergonomic position of the surgeon appear to enhance surgical precision. Robotic surgery in children using the Da Vinci system seems to be feasible and safe. However, the technique is limited due to the fact that instruments adapted to the size of small children are not available. Furthermore, the high costs and prolonged system setup are disadvantages.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

[Robotic surgery: toy or tool?].

Telemanipulation has been developed for industrial purposes since the 1970s. More recently, telemanipulated arms entered the operating room. This paper briefly describes the history of surgical robotics and discusses the advantages and disadvantages for both patients and surgeons. The authors advocate the development of robotic surgery, as it facilitates the training of young surgeons and can be useful during certain phases of an operation. Thus, robotic surgery is more a promising tool than a simple toy.

Humans↗

PubMed2005

Robotic surgery training and performance: identifying objective variables for quantifying the extent of proficiency.

BACKGROUND: To understand the process of skill acquisition in robotic surgery and to allow useful real-time feedback to surgeons and trainees in future generations of robotic surgical systems, robotic surgical skills should be determined with objective variables. The aim of this study was to assess skill acquisition through a training protocol, and to identify variables for the quantification of proficiency. METHODS: Seven novice users of the da Vinci Surgical System engaged in 4 weeks of training that involved practicing three bimanual tasks with the system. Seven variables were determined for assessing speed of performance, bimanual coordination, and muscular activation. These values were compared before and after training. RESULTS: Significant improvements were observed through training in five variables. Bimanual coordination showed differences between the surgical tasks used, whereas muscular activation patterns showed better muscle use through training. The subjects also performed the surgical tasks considerably faster within the first two to three training sessions. CONCLUSIONS: The study objectively demonstrated that the novice users could learn to perform surgical tasks faster and with more consistency, better bimanual dexterity, and better muscular activity utilization. The variables examined showed great promise as objective indicators of proficiency and skill acquisition in robotic surgery.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

A new era of robotic surgery assisted by a computer-enhanced surgical system.

Computer-enhanced robotic surgery has now been introduced into general surgical practice. The robotic system enables us to manipulate endoscopic instruments, as well as instruments during open surgical intervention, regarding both the operative field and operation techniques. This technologic innovation should therefore help surgeons overcome various difficulties and allow them to perform more precise, safer, and more minimally invasive surgery in the coming era.

General Surgery↗

PubMed2006

Survey of residency training in laparoscopic and robotic surgery.

PURPOSE: We determined the current status of residency training in laparoscopic and robotic surgery in the United States and Canada. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1,188 surveys were sent via the Internet to all 1,056 current urology residents and 132 program directors with an Internet address registered with the American Urological Association. RESULTS: Responses were received from 372 residents (35%) and 56 program directors (42%). Of respondents 47% reported greater than 100 laparoscopic procedures performed yearly by 1 (36%) or more (51%) faculty members. Robotic procedures were performed at 54% of the institutions, mainly consisting of prostatectomy and pyeloplasty. At all institutions laparoscopic radical nephrectomy was performed and those at 69% of the institutions believed that it is the gold standard for renal tumors today. Urologists were involved in 87% of adrenal surgeries and 54% of respondents believed that is the gold standard approach. However, only 35% of respondents had participated in laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Of respondents 36%, 42% and 17% reported that laparoscopic donor nephrectomy was performed by only urologists, only a nonurology transplant team and shared equally, respectively. Of respondents 41% planned on performing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in the next year. Laparoscopic needle ablation renal surgery was done in 51% of the programs and percutaneous needle ablation was done in 63%. None of the respondents (0%) believed that it is the gold standard but 51% believed that ablative procedures look promising for renal tumors. Of respondents 39% had participated in robotic radical prostatectomy and 53% thought that it looked promising but was not the gold standard. Of respondents 31% believed that they will be performing robotic surgery after residency, 30% were unsure and 29% will not be using the robot. Overall 38% of residents thought that their laparoscopic experience was at least average or acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: A large number of laparoscopic urological procedures are being performed at training institutions with robotic procedures being performed at 54% of respondent facilities. Residents are participating in most cases but only 38% consider their laparoscopic experience to be satisfactory. A need still exists for increased laparoscopic training for residents, which can be accomplished by expanding training facilities and increasing the number of faculty members performing laparoscopic procedures.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Computer-enhanced robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to report the computer-enhanced robotic surgery experience of the authors' gynecologic oncology division. METHODS: From January 2001 to August 2006, 41 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery by our gynecologic oncology service using a computer-enhanced surgical robot. This report describes a retrospective review of these patients. RESULTS: The patients ranged in age from 27 to 77 years (mean, 44.2 years), in weight from 44 to 131 kg (mean, 72.1 kg), in operative time from 1 h and 50 min to 9 h (mean, 5 h and 2 min), and in estimated blood loss from 50 to 1,500 ml (mean, 253 ml). Of the 20 patients with gynecologic malignancies, 14 had cervical cancer. A total of 21 patients had benign indications for surgery. Complications included shoulder palsy, robot failure, colotomy, bradycardia, and intraabdominal bleeding requiring minilaparotomy and ligation of a bleeding pedicle. CONCLUSION: This case series is one of the first to report the use of a computer-enhanced surgical robot in gynecologic oncology. This approach proved to be feasible and well tolerated in this series of patients and deserves further study for clarification of its indications, benefits, and safety.

Adult↗

PubMed2007

Robotic surgery in the pediatric airway: application and safety.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the application and safety of transoral robotic surgery in the pediatric airway. DESIGN: An institutional review board-approved study. Experimental laryngeal surgery was performed on 4 pediatric cadaver larynxes as controls. Application of robotic equipment for laryngeal surgery was attempted on 5 patients. SETTING: Tertiary care pediatric medical center. PATIENTS: Five patients with laryngeal cleft and 4 pediatric cadaver larynxes. INTERVENTIONS: (1) The da Vinci Surgical Robot (Intuitive Surgical Inc, Sunnyvale, Calif) was used on 4 cadaver larynxes and assessed for the dexterity, precision, and depth perception that it allowed the surgeon during laryngeal surgery. Procedures were documented with still and video photography. (2) The da Vinci Surgical Robot was used through a transoral approach to attempt repair of a laryngeal cleft in 5 pediatric patients who were under spontaneously breathing general anesthesia. RESULTS: (1) Use of the surgical robot on cadaver larynxes provided great dexterity and precision, delicate tissue handling, good 3-dimensional depth perception, and relatively easy endolaryngeal suturing. (2) The surgical robot could not be used for repair of laryngeal cleft on 3 patients owing to limited transoral access. However, 1 patient with a type 1 laryngeal cleft and 1 patient with a type 2 laryngeal cleft underwent transoral robotic repair with great success. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical robots provide the ability to manipulate instruments at their distal end with great precision, increased freedom of movement, and excellent 3-dimensional depth perception. The size of the equipment can be a limiting factor with regard to the application and success of the transoral approach to airway surgery. We believe that further advances in device technology and a new generation of robotic equipment will facilitate the incorporation of surgical robotics in the advancement of minimally invasive endoscopic airway surgery.

Adolescent↗