SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Clinical Trials Data Monitoring Committees”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 361 records · Page 20Linked to original sources

PubMed1996

[Quality control in clinical trials].

Quality control (QC) in clinical trials means the procedures which insure protection of human subjects from research risk, reliability of the data, and thereby assures internal consistency. This has been developed since 1970s in the US, by establishing various regulations which are now called GCP. From the viewpoint of total QC, it should be emphasized that rigorous review of protocol by the Institutional Review Board and obtaining Informed Consent are prerequisites for insuring the quality of the given trial at high scientific level. When pursuing a clinical trial, first of all, facilities of the institutions and the ability of investigators must be of high quality. For this reason, at each institution previous data related to trials should be thoroughly reviewed and analyzed prior to developing a protocol. Educational courses in QC in clinical practice are invaluable. QC of diagnosis means, for example, central pathology review and standardization of diagnostic procedures and process. Secondly, at each institution, data managers collect the data and submit them to the central office at the indicated time. In order to evolve clinical trial, continuous education for data managers and expansion of their job are encouraged. Thirdly, at the statistical center independent from the research group office, subject-specific data managers, the biostatistical staff, must check submitted forms for completeness, consistency and accuracy. Finally, at the data analysis, quality evaluation of the research should also be carried out. Throughout the trial, monitoring and audit are particularly important to assure quality. The sponsor has the responsibility of monitoring the trial and make rigorous onsite visits, and the individual study group also have a monitoring program, while the FDA and the NCI audit by themselves. The purpose of audit is not only to assure data reliability but also to check out patient compliance to drug, education as to regulations and rules of clinical trials and the analysis of violations so as to provide suggestions to improve medical care.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

PubMed1998

The ischemic optic neuropathy decompression trial (IONDT): design and methods.

The objective of the Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Decompression Trial (IONDT) was to investigate the safety and efficacy of optic nerve decompression surgery (ONDS) compared to careful follow-up for nonarteritic ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) and to observe the natural history of NAION in untreated patients. It was designed as a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial. Resource centers included a Chairman's Office, a Coordinating Center, and 25 Clinical Centers at eye centers throughout the United States. The trial's methods were as follows. Eligible patients with visual acuity 20/64 or worse were randomized to ONDS or careful follow-up; eligible patients with visual acuity better than 20/64 made up a natural history cohort and were followed but not randomized to treatment. The primary outcome examined was an increase of three lines or more of visual acuity at 6 months. Additional outcomes were visual acuity at other follow-up times, visual field, quality of life, and morbidity associated with ONDS. Standard quality assurance methodology was used to monitor adherence to protocol. The surgical protocol was monitored by a Surgical Quality Assurance Committee (SQAC). Enrollment began October 8, 1992, and ceased October 20, 1994, because of preliminary findings indicating that surgery was of no benefit and was perhaps harmful. This report describes the design and methods of the trial and the rationale for design elements unique to the IONDT. Specific goals of study design and conduct included achieving an accelerated study start-up and rapidly producing results acceptable to the medical community.

Data Interpretation, Statistical↗

PubMed2001

Bayesian discrimination with longitudinal data.

The motivation for the methodological development is a double-blind clinical trial designed to estimate the effect of regular injection of growth hormone, with the purpose of identifying growth hormone abusers in sport. The data formed part of a multicentre investigation jointly sponsored by the European Union and the International Olympic Committee. The data are such that for each individual there is a matrix of marker variables by time point (nominally 8 markers at each of 7 time points). Data arise out of a double-blind trial in which individuals are given growth hormone at one of two dose levels or placebo daily for 28 days. Monitoring by means of blood samples is at 0, 21, 28, 30, 33, 42 and 84 days. We give a new method of Bayesian discrimination for multivariate longitudinal data. This involves a Kronecker product covariance structure for the time by measurements (markers) data on each individual. This structure is estimated by an empirical Bayes approach, using an ECM algorithm, within a Bayesian Gaussian discrimination model. In future one may have markers for an individual at one or more time points. The method gives probabilities that an individual is on placebo or on one of the two dose regimes.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2004

The international suicide prevention trial (interSePT): rationale and design of a trial comparing the relative ability of clozapine and olanzapine to reduce suicidal behavior in schizophrenia and schizoaffective patients.

Suicidal behavior in patients with psychotic disorders represents a seriously undertreated life-threatening condition. The International Suicide Prevention Trial (InterSePT) is the first large-scale, prospective study designed to evaluate the potential of antipsychotic medications to reduce suicidal behaviors in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who are known to be at high risk for suicide. The unique challenges to study design and the solutions identified for the InterSePT study are described. These challenges included defining suicidal behavior in patients with psychosis, endpoint selection, determination of analytic strategy, and development of scales to assess suicidal behavior. Given the life-threatening nature of suicidal behavior, ethical considerations required that the design minimize suicide attempts and deaths. While the study focused primarily on treatment of suicide, opportunities were used to collect data in related areas of interest, including suicide risk factors, other efficacy measures (e.g., Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Covi Anxiety Scale, Calgary Depression Scale), adverse events, pharmacoeconomics, and pharmacogenetics. Because of the complexity of the design issues, a steering committee, suicide monitoring board, and publication committee were established to assist with their management.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2001

Current issues in clinical research and the development of new pharmaceuticals.

As a normal part of the drug development process, U.S. pharmaceutical companies conduct many thousands of clinical trials each year. Only after a reasonable assurance of safety is made can the drug be given to patients who have the underlying medical condition that the drug is designed to treat. Patient welfare is assured by adhering to the Food and Drug Administration's interpretation of the "common rule" if the data will be used to support a licensing application. 21 CFR Part 50 sets forth the regulations along with the principles of informed consent and the use of institutional review boards (IRBs) that assure patients' rights are protected. Any potential conflict of interest on the part of a clinical investigator must be reported to the FDA. Pharmaceutical companies extensively monitor ongoing clinical trials for compliance with appropriate regulations. The recent revision of the Declaration of Helsinki governing placebo-controlled clinical trials may adversely impact drug development.

Advisory Committees↗

PubMed1990

Ethical considerations in phase I clinical trials.

Medical ethics has developed methods of differential ethics for a more rigid integration of bioethical reasoning into biomedical research. Due to high levels of risk and uncertainty in phase I trials, established principles of medical ethics need a specific assessment in order to provide for better moral design and moral monitoring of trial procedures, a better translation of medical health status data into individual quality of life criteria, and strong support for trust-based cooperation between physician, research team and patient. Existing bioethical questionnaires and detailed methodological research in differential ethics could be improved further.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed2003

Erlotinib: CP 358774, NSC 718781, OSI 774, R 1415.

Erlotinib [Tarceva, R 1415, CP 358774, OSI 774, NSC 718781] is a small molecular, once-a-day, orally active inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase. This profile has been selected from R&D Insight, a pharmaceutical intelligence database produced by Adis International Ltd. It is one of a class of anticancer drugs that target the underlying molecular mechanism involving oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes, which play critical roles in the conversion of normal cells into a cancerous state. Erlotinib is undergoing clinical development as an oral tablet by an alliance between OSI Pharmaceuticals, Genentech and Roche. OSI Pharmaceuticals, Genentech and Roche have entered an agreement for the global development and commercialisation of erlotinib. Under the terms of the agreement, Genentech and OSI will share costs and profit-taking for commercialising the product in the US. The overall costs of the development programme will be shared equally between the three companies. OSI will keep certain co-promotion rights in the US and Genentech will be responsible for commercialising the drug in the US should the FDA approve it. Roche will take the responsibility for obtaining regulatory approval and commercialisation in territories outside the US and pay royalties to OSI on net sales of the product in these markets. Initially, the alliance partners intend to pursue development of erlotinib in all the major tumour markets, particularly for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in which the group will focus on front-line combination approaches. Pfizer and OSI Pharmaceuticals in the US were developing erlotinib as a treatment for solid tumours. However, in June 2000, Pfizer merged with Warner-Lambert. The resulting company retained the Pfizer name, but in order to meet Federal Trade Commission requirements for the merger Pfizer granted all developmental and marketing rights for erlotinib to OSI Pharmaceuticals. This divestiture of the erlotinib portfolio, in effect, gave OSI a royalty-free, cashless license to the drug. In November 2001, OSI announced a partnership deal with HopeLink Corporation, a healthcare information technology company with an Internet-based Clinical Trial Service. The partnership will enable OSI to heighten awareness of its clinical trials and shorten patient accrual times. It will initially involve the presentation of the OSI phase III pancreatic and refractory NSCLC trials via Hopelink's Syndicated Network. In addition to this the two companies have also agreed to develop additional products and service together that will increase the efficiency of the clinical trial process, increase awareness of clinical trials, and enhance patient accrual techniques. OSI has also entered into an agreement with Therradex, a contract research organisation (CRO) to monitor phase II trials for erlotinib in NSCLC, ovarian and head and neck cancer. In addition, OSI entered into an agreement in 2001 with the US NCI. The NCI is conducting trials in a variety of different cancers. A phase III front-line NSCLC trial (TRIBUTE) of erlotinib in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel was initiated in July 2001. The multicentre study is being conducted by Genentech in 1000 patients in the US, and will determine whether the addition of erlotinib to carboplatin chemotherapy is able to improve the duration of patient survival. Enrolment for this trial was completed in July 2002. An independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) has since reviewed the data from the trial and concluded that there are no safety or efficacy concerns that would warrant stopping the trial. However, the DMC did recommend stopping erlotinib at the time of disease progression or at the start of second-line therapy. A front-line phase III study of erlotinib in NSCLC (TALENT) in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy was initiated by Roche in Europe in November 2001. Enrolment into this study was completed in September 2002, with approximately 1200 patients. Roche has confirmed that the study woulde has confirmed that the study would be included in the alliance's potential regulatory submission for front-line therapy in chemotherapy-naive patients in the US. Data from the trial is expected in the second half of 2003. OSI has opened two additional phase Ib studies to examine the potential of erlotinib in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in one study and gemcitabine and cisplatin in the other. A phase I study of erlotinib is also being conducted in patients with lung cancer in Japan. OSI received fast-track status from the US FDA in September 2002 for erlotinib as a second- or third-line treatment for patients with incurable stage IIIB/IV NSCLC who have failed to respond to standard therapy for advanced metastatic disease. Fast-track status was also granted to erlotinib in May 2002 for the treatment of chemotherapy-naive stage III/IV NSCLC. There are important differences between phase III studies of erlotinib and AstraZeneca's direct competitor drug gefitinib, which recently returned disappointing results in a frontline NSCLC trial with combination chemotherapy. In assessing the survival benefit of erlotinib with chemotherapy, the dose employed of 150 mg/day is the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), whereas the gefitinib trials were conducted at relatively lower doses than the MTD determined in earlier phase I studies. OSI is also investigating the survival benefit of erlotinib in a phase III study in refractory NSCLC patients, a key registration study. Patient size of the NSCLC trial was increased from 330 to 700 as OSI shifted emphasis from its pancreatic cancer trials. Phase II development for this indication was initiated based on data from a phase I trial, which had completed patient enrolment by April 2003. OSI and the US NCI signed a collaborative research agreement in 2001. The NCI is developing erlotinib through its CTEP programme for multiple tumour types including epithelial malignancies, gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts, gynaecological malignancies and brain tumours. OSI supplies erlotinib for the trial, but the NCI provides the funding and manages the trials. A series of approximately ten phase Ib trials are already underway or were set to start in the US in 2001 to determine safety, tolerance and pharmacokinetic parameters of erlotinib in combination with a number of commonly used chemotherapeutic agents. The Wall Street Journal reported on 25 February 2002, that analysts at Robert Stephens, New York, USA, have forecast Tarceva to reach annual sales of >$US1 billion. Other analysts, at Merrill Lynch & Co., have predicted that products belonging to the same class as Tarceva could reach combined worldwide sales of $US6 billion to $US10 billion annually. In an earlier report by the Financial Times on 10 May 2001, it was stated that approximately 12 new anticancer agents are expected to be approved by the FDA through to the end of 2002. These agents, of which Tarceva is one, were said to have the potential to generate total sales of $US2.6 billion. Goldman Sachs have forecast Tarceva to reach peak sales of $US250 million for the indication of head and neck cancer alone. Previously in January 2001, the Financial Times claimed that OSI Pharmaceuticals, one of the development partners for Tarceva, stood to gain $US187 million pending regulatory approval. Genentech and Roche were each said to be buying $US35 million worth of OSI's stock and paying upfront fees. Tarceva is facing competition by two similar compounds, developed by AstraZeneca and ImClone, respectively.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2006

[Cardiac tolerance of moxifloxacin: Clinical experience from a large observational French study in usual medical practice (IMMEDIAT study)].

BACKGROUND: Moxifloxacin (Izilox) is prescribed for bacterial respiratory tract infections. ECG analysis done in clinical trials showed a mean QT prolongation at 6 ms that could lead to Torsades de Pointe. However, Izilox was well tolerated during clinical trials. To confirm the correct safety profile of Izilox in a large sample of patients, a French PMS study - MMEDIAT - was carried out in usual medical practice. METHODS: This prospective observational uncontrolled and monitored study was conducted in 13,578 patients with respiratory tract infection and treated with moxifloxacin 400 mg daily (duration: 5 to 10 days in accordance to the Market Authorization). Any clinical event being potentially a surrogate of a ventricular rhythm disorder ("critical event") were collected and analyzed by a Scientific Committee in charge to determine the potential cardiac origin of the reported event and to establish a causal relationship with the treatment. RESULTS: Among 13,578 patients, 1046 adverse events (678 patients [5%]) were reported, including 854 drug related events (564 patients [4.15%]). Of these 1046 adverse events, 95 (62 patients [0.46%]) were serious. A total of 189 critical adverse events (159 patients [1.2%]) were reviewed by the Scientific Committee. After analysis, 34 adverse events (28 patients [0.21%]) were assessed from potential cardiac origin. Of these 34 adverse events, 25 (19 patients [0.14%]) were assessed as drug-related: palpitations [13 patients], tachycardia [4 patients], malaise [4 patients], vertigo [3 patients] and pallor [1 patient]. All adverse events were transient and had favourable outcome. CONCLUSION: This PMS study confirmed that Izilox is well-tolerated in usual medical practice, in adequation with the safety data obtained in clinical trials.

Anti-Infective Agents↗

PubMed1997

Mantoux (tuberculosis) testing. Evaluation of guidelines for testing in Canadian institutions.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the guidelines for Mantoux testing and isoniazid (INH) prophylaxis in various institutions and shelters for the homeless in Canada in light of research in Canada and other industrialized countries. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE searches from January 1980 to June 1996 yielded 219 articles, some of which were case reports. The bibliographies of these articles were searched for relevant titles. A further search adding the words randomized, controlled trial and controlled clinical trial yielded two citations, neither of which was a randomized, controlled trial. DATA EXTRACTION: Studies were included if they described the incidence, screening, diagnosis, or prophylaxis of tuberculosis (TB), in institutions in Canada. DATA SYNTHESIS: Studies of staff patients in institutions tend to be incomplete in reporting exposure to TB, extent of Mantoux testing, and whether INH prophylaxis was completed. CONCLUSIONS: Institutions admitting patients with TB should follow the 1996 recommendations of the Canadian Thoracic Society (CTS). The best way to implement the recommendations is to have a TB control officer who administers protocols to identify staff and patients at risk for TB and a committee that regularly monitors implementation of CTS guidelines.

Antitubercular Agents↗

PubMed1994

Survival of myocardial infarction long-term evaluation (SMILE) study: rationale, design, organization, and outcome definitions.

The rationale, design, organization, and outcome definitions of the Survival of Myocardial Infarction Long-term Evaluation (SMILE) study are described in detail. Recruitment of a total of 1500 patients (750 per treatment group) has been planned for this multicenter, double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled trial investigating the effects of oral treatment with zofenopril calcium (7.5-30 mg twice a day) on the combined short-term total mortality and occurrence of severe refractory congestive heart failure in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction (AMI). Secondary outcomes of the study include recurrent myocardial infarction, angina, and progression of congestive heart failure, as well as long-term mortality. Patients are initially treated in hospital within 24 hr from the onset of symptoms of AMI and their active follow-up is continued for 6 weeks. In addition, the patients will be passively followed for 12 months from the index AMI to assess vital status and the occurrence of congestive heart failure. The trial data are analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. An international independent policy and safety monitoring board is acting as the overall supervisory body and is responsible for the ethical conduct of the trial. A scientific committee is responsible for the scientific aspects of the trial and for the regular review of the progress of the study.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2002

Dose-dense biweekly doxorubicin/docetaxel versus sequential neoadjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide/docetaxel in operable breast cancer: second interim analysis.

Timing of systemic treatment in primary operable breast cancer is subject to extensive investigation, suggesting that pathologic complete remission (pCR) might improve survival in this setting. The German Adjuvant Breast Cancer Group previously demonstrated the feasibility of a dose-dense biweekly schedule of 4 cycles doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 and docetaxel 75 mg/m2 (ddAT) +/- tamoxifen in the neoadjuvant setting to yield a pCR of 9.7% (Gepardo trial). Patients assigned to ddAT received prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support (5 micro g/kg days 5-10). The current study (GeparDUO) was designed to assess whether the pCR rate, including no viable invasive and preinvasive tumor cells, achieved with ddAT was equivalent to sequential administration of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel (AC-DOC) over 24 weeks in primary operable breast cancer. From June 1999 to September 2001, 913 patients were enrolled in this trial. In total, 395 patients randomized before August 1, 2000, were included in the second interim analysis. Safety data were available from 369 patients (ddAT, n = 191; AC-DOC, n = 178) demonstrating that toxicity of both regimens was tolerable. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 39.8% of patients receiving ddAT and in 69.3% of patients treated with AC-DOC. Efficacy data were available in 378 patients. A pCR occurred in 14.8% of the primary breast tumors. According to the recommendations of the data monitoring committee, recruitment to the study was halted as of September 2001 (n = 913/1000) due to the significant difference in pCR rates observed between the treatment arms. Surgery was documented in 380 patients. Breast conservation was possible in 288 cases (75.8%). The application of both schedules is safe and feasible in an outpatient setting. Although, results obtained from this interim analysis are encouraging, caution is recommended until the results obtained show statistical difference in pCR.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Randomized trial of AT-1015 for treatment of intermittent claudication. A novel 5-hydroxytryptamine antagonist with no evidence of efficacy.

AT-1015 is a novel selective 5-HT2A serotonin receptor antagonist that is known to impair platelet aggregation and vasoconstriction. Serotonin has been hypothesized to contribute to claudication symptoms in individuals with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) via microvascular vasoconstrictor and thrombotic effects. AT-1015 was thus evaluated in 439 patients with claudication who were randomized in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing 10 mg, 20 mg, and 40 mg BID versus placebo for 24 weeks. Treadmill walking performance was assessed by peak walking time (PWT) and pain-free walking time (PFWT). Quality of life (QoL) was measured by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) and the Health Status Survey SF-36. Limb hemodynamics was assessed with the ankle-brachial index (ABI). The 40 mg arm was terminated prematurely by recommendation of the Data Safety Monitoring Committee due to an excess number of non-fatal myocardial infarctions. At study conclusion, there were no statistically significant differences in the mean change of PWT, PFWT, ABI and QoL between the 10 mg and 20 mg BID treatment groups compared with placebo. The proportion of patients who experienced an adverse event (AE) was similar across all treatment groups. Antimuscarinic and gastrointestinal AEs were more common in the AT-1015 treatment groups. Two deaths occurred: one in the placebo group and the other in the AT-1015 20 mg group. Although a prolongation of the QTc interval was observed in all groups, this was not clinically significant (QTc > 500 ms). Mean supine pulse rates were significantly increased in all AT-1015 treatment groups, consistent with predicted antimuscarinic effects. Population pharmacokinetic analysis fit a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. These data indicate that selective serotonin receptor blockade does not improve exercise tolerance or quality of life in individuals with claudication.

Aged↗

PubMed2000

A role for radiotherapy in neuropathic bone pain: preliminary response rates from a prospective trial (Trans-tasman radiation oncology group, TROG 96.05)

PURPOSE: Radiotherapy (RT) has a proven role in palliation of pain from bone metastases with numerous randomized trials obtaining response rates (RRs) of typically 70-80% regardless of the fractionation employed. However RT for neuropathic bone pain (NBP), i.e., pain with a radiating cutaneous component due to compression/irritation of nerves by tumor has not previously been studied, and its role is thus uncertain. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In February 1996, the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) initiated a multicenter randomized trial comparing a single 8 Gy fraction with 20 Gy in 5 fractions for NBP with an accrual target of 270. Formal interim analyses were planned at 90 and 180 patients. The 90th patient was accrued in June 1998, and data from the first interim analysis with both arms combined form the basis of this report. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were randomized to a single 8 Gy, 46 to 20 Gy in 5 fractions. The commonest primary sites were prostate (34%), lung (28%) and breast (10%). Median age was 68 years (range 37-89). The index site was spine (86%), rib (13%), base of skull (1%). On an intention-to-treat basis, the overall RR was 53/90 = 59% (95% CI = 48-69%), with 27% achieving a complete response and 32% a partial response. The overall RR for eligible patients was 49/81 = 60% (95% CI = 49-71%) with 27% and 33% achieving complete and partial responses respectively. Estimated median time to treatment failure was 3.2 months (95% CI = 2.1-5.1 months), with estimated median survival of 5.1 months (95% CI = 4.2-7.2 months). To date, six spinal cord/cauda equina compressions and four new or progressive pathological fractures have been detected at the index site after randomization, although one cord compression occurred before radiotherapy was planned to commence. In February 1999, the Independent Data Monitoring Committee strongly recommended continuation of the trial. CONCLUSION: Although these results are preliminary, it seems clear that there is indeed a role for RT in the treatment of NBP. Analysis of outcome by treatment arm awaits completion of the randomized trial.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Early stopping rules--clinical perspectives and ethical considerations.

A clinical trial should only be launched in the presence of equipoise both amongst clinicians responsible for treating the disease and their patients. However, during the period of patient recruitment the chances are that the levels of equipoise will modify. In some cases, where toxicity or inferiority of efficacy are readily demonstrable, the trial needs to be stopped prematurely to prevent harm to patients. In other cases, the degree of equipoise may be increased by the very existence of the trial or from conflicting evidence reported from other studies. By reference to four specific trials it is argued that instead of definitive rules, the decision as to whether recruitment should be continued must be the role of a Data Monitoring Committee which is able to consider and respond to all the available evidence.

Bias↗

PubMed2005

Moderate hypothermia in neonatal encephalopathy: safety outcomes.

Hypoxic-ischemic injury may cause multisystem organ damage with significant aberrations in clotting, renal, and cardiac functions. Systemic hypothermia may aggravate these medical conditions, such as bradycardia and increased clotting times, and very little safety data in neonatal hypoxic-ischemic injury is available. This study reports a multicenter, randomized, controlled pilot trial of moderate systemic hypothermia (33 degrees C) vs normothermia (37 degrees C) for 48 hours in infants with neonatal encephalopathy instituted within 6 hours of birth or hypoxic-ischemic event. The best outcome measures of safety were determined, comparing rates of adverse events between normothermia and hypothermia groups. A total of 32 hypothermia and 33 normothermia neonates were enrolled in seven centers. Adverse events and serious adverse effects were collected by the study team during the hospital admission, monitored by an independent study monitor, and reported to Institutional Review Boards and the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee. The following adverse events were observed significantly more commonly in the hypothermia group: more frequent bradycardia and lower heart rates during the period of hypothermia, longer dependence on pressors, higher prothrombin times, and lower platelet counts with more patients requiring plasma and platelet transfusions. Seizures as an adverse event were more common in the hypothermia group. These observed side effects of 48 hours of moderate systemic hypothermia were of mild to moderate severity and manageable with minor interventions.

Acidosis↗

PubMed2001

Topical mitomycin application after laryngotracheal reconstruction: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of mitomycin treatment on the pediatric airway following laryngotracheal reconstruction. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. PATIENTS: Children aged 2 to 17 years with subglottic or upper tracheal stenosis undergoing laryngotracheal reconstruction at a single, tertiary care, children's hospital. INTERVENTION: At the time of extubation or stent removal, the children underwent bronchoscopy and 0.4 mg/mL (2 mL of a 0.2-mg/mL solution of either mitomycin or an equal volume of isotonic sodium chloride was directly applied to the subglottic region for a single application of 2 minutes. These children then underwent interval endoscopy at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months postoperatively for assessment of their airways. RESULTS: Granulation tissue was graded on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (near-total or total occlusion). Videotapes of endoscopies were independently observed and graded by 3 pediatric otolaryngology fellows with a subsequent interobserver agreement of 91.6%. The results were then dichotomized to represent a single cohort in which further surgical intervention would be required and another separate cohort in which further surgery would not be required. At the 1-year mark, interim analysis was performed by a Data Safety and Monitoring Committee. At this time, 13 children had been randomized to the mitomycin-treated arm of the study and 11 children to the placebo-treated arm. A 2-tailed Fisher exact test revealed a value of 1.00. The Data Monitoring and Safety Committee advised that the trial should be stopped because the distributions between the 2 populations were almost identical. CONCLUSION: We cannot reject the null hypothesis that a single topical dose of mitomycin exerts an equal benefit as does isotonic sodium chloride when applied to the pediatric airway after laryngotracheal reconstruction.

Administration, Topical↗

PubMed1999

[Medicamentous prevention of symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation/flutter onset. Goals and design of the SOPAT Study. Executive committee of the investigators representing trial physicians].

The indication to treat symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is discussed controversely. Successful medical treatment may result in the reduction of symptoms by improving hemodynamics in a reduction of thromboembolic events. However, several antiarrhythmic drugs are also known to increase the risk of proarrhythmic events. A randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled multicenter trial with 1000 patients to be recruited was designed to compare the effects of two antiarrhythmic drugs frequently used in Germany for the treatment of atrial fibrillation, Sotalol and the fixed combination of chinidin and verapamil (Cordichin). Patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter will be observed for a period of one year. The occurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is documented by transtelephonic ECG monitoring. Patients with document an ECG once daily, and recording is mandatory in case of symptoms. ECGs are transmitted to a central data base for analysis. This clinical trial is designed to answer the following questions: (1) What is the average rate of spontaneous events of symptomatic atrial fibrillation? (2) Is it possible to reduce the frequency of symptomatic events by chronic antiarrhythmic drug administration? (3) What is the long-term frequency for the occurrence of severe side-effects under antiarrhythmic medication? The primary endpoint is defined as the time to first recurrence of symptomatic arrhythmia after reaching steady-state plasma concentrations of the study medication. The trial started in November 1997 and is planned to be finished by the end of 1999.

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents↗

PubMed2006

Trabectedin: Ecteinascidin 743, Ecteinascidin-743, ET 743, ET-743, NSC 684766.

Trabectedin [Ecteinascidin 743, Yondelis, ET 743, NSC 684766] is a tetrahydroisoquinoline alkaloid derived from the Caribbean marine tunicate, Ecteinascidia turbinata. The drug is being developed by PharmaMar (Zeltia) in partnership with Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development LLC. It was synthetically isolated and developed by the University of Illinois and licensed to PharmaMar; the company has completed the hemisynthesis of agent. Trabectedin interacts with the minor groove of DNA and alkylates guanine at the N2 position, which bends towards the major groove. In this manner, it is thought that the drug affects various transcription factors involved in cell proliferation, particularly via the transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair system. Trabectedin blocks the cell cycle at the G(2) phase, while cells at the G(1 )phase are most sensitive to the drug. It also inhibits overexpression of the multidrug resistance-1 gene (MDR-1) coding for the P-glycoprotein that is a major factor responsible for cells developing resistance to cancer drugs. The agent is also thought to interfere with the nucleotide excision repair pathways of cancer cells, suggesting that it could be effective in the treatment of many cancer types including melanoma and sarcoma, as well as lung, breast, ovarian, endometrial and prostate cancers; clinical evaluations are underway in these indications. PharmaMar and Ortho Biotech Products (Johnson & Johnson) entered into an agreement in August 2001 for the joint development and commercialisation of trabectedin. PharmaMar retains commercialisation rights in Europe, including Eastern Europe. Ortho Biotech will market the product in the US, Japan and the rest of the world; Tibotec Therapeutics (a division of Ortho Biotech) will commercialise it in the US. PharmaMar will receive an initial payment from Ortho Biotech plus future milestone and royalty payments linked to development targets and sales; the upfront payment would be approximately 20 million US dollars with royalties contributing 10-20% of total sales of the drug. Although details of the licensing transaction for trabectedin were undisclosed, analysts estimate the figure to be around 100 million US dollars. Previously, PharmaMar signed an agreement granting Bristol-Myers Squibb the option to evaluate and develop as many as 12 of PharmaMar's marine-derived anticancer compounds on an exclusive worldwide basis. However, it appears that Bristol-Myers Squibb had chosen not to exercise the option. Trabectedin is undergoing clinical trials in soft tissue sarcoma (Sarcoma in the Phase table), ovarian, breast, endometrial, prostate and non-small-cell lung cancers. PharmaMar indicated in January 2004 that it intends to launch trabectedin in one of these indications in 2006. PharmaMar raised funds from a round of financing in June 2005 that will be used to fund further clinical trials of its anticancer products, including trabectedin. The US FDA granted trabectedin orphan drug status for ovarian cancer in April 2005. Trabectedin also received orphan drug status from the European Commission for the treatment of ovarian cancer in October 2003. This followed a positive opinion by the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP) of the EMEA. Trabectedin has undergone a phase II study for the second- or third-line treatment of ovarian cancer in Europe (England and Belgium), the US and Canada. The trial was initiated in October 2002 and evaluated a weekly schedule of trabectedin (0.58 mg/m(2)) via IV infusion for 3 weeks followed by a week of rest. Final results from this study have been presented. A separate phase II trial evaluating the antitumour activity of trabectedin as a second-line therapy in advanced ovarian cancer was conducted by researchers at the Southern Europe New Drugs Organization (SENDO) in Milan, Italy. PharmaMar and Johnson & Johnson are conducting a pivotal (STS-201) trial to compare a weekly and daily dosing regimen of trabectedin among patients with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma who are unresponsive to standard chemotherapy of doxorubicin and ifosfamide. The randomised, multicentre, open-label trial has completed enrolment of 270 patients during the second quarter of 2005. Positive data from the STS-201 trial have been announced. An independent data monitoring committee has found that interim data supports a positive trend in time to disease progression favouring patients receiving the daily dosing regimen. Consequently, all patients have been offered the option of switching to the daily regimen. Final results from the STS-201 trial will form the basis of MAA re-submission with European regulatory authorities. PharmaMar has held a pre-submission meeting with the EMEA and has presented a formal letter of intent to file for approval of trabectedin for soft tissue sarcoma. Previously, PharmaMar first filed for EU registration of trabectedin for treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma in November 2001, which was accepted for review by the EMEA and Swiss Health Authorities. However, the CPMP confirmed its recommendation not to grant trabectedin marketing authorisation in November 2003 following PharmaMar's appeal against the CPMP's negative opinion first announced in July 2003; the opinion was adopted by a majority vote rather than by consensus. Trabectedin was granted orphan drug status in Europe for recurrent soft tissue sarcoma in 2001. It was also granted orphan drug status by the FDA for the same indication in October 2004. Phase I studies are being conducted to evaluate trabectedin in combination with doxorubicin and liposomal doxorubicin for the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma. PharmaMar is also conducting a phase I study of sequential paclitaxel followed by trabectedin in patients with soft tissue sarcoma. At additional dose levels, patients with other tumour types will be enrolled to assess the antitumour activity of the combination. The US NCI has approved and is partially funding a phase I clinical programme to determine the feasibility of using trabectedin to treat children with soft tissue sarcoma and bone sarcoma who are resistant to conventional therapies. PharmaMar has reported that trabectedin can be safely administered to children at doses up to 1100mg given as a 3-hour infusion, and that this dose will be used in further paediatric studies. Trabectedin has completed phase II studies for small round cell sarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma, which are aggressive tumours occurring predominantly in children. A phase II study evaluating two dosing schedules of trabectedin has been conducted in patients with leiomyosarcomas or liposarcomas refractory to standard doxorubicin + ifosfamide chemotherapy. The study was conducted in Australia, Canada, Russia and the US.

Animals↗