SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Delphi Technique”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 361 records · Page 20Linked to original sources

PubMed1996

Characteristics, importance, and implications of comprehensive drug therapy management.

Ideas and opinions about comprehensive drug therapy management (CDTM) were gathered from an expert panel representing health care practitioners, educators, and consumers. A qualitative method of inquiry, the Delphi technique, was used to aggregate opinions of an expert panel of health care professionals, health care educators, and consumer representatives. The 66 experts who agreed to participate in the study consisted of 10 from pharmacy education, 10 from pharmacy professional associations, 20 from managed care, 19 from primary care, and 7 consumers (public members of health care regulatory and governing boards). Each participant was sent a questionnaire designed to evaluate a preliminary definition of CDTM and gather opinions on related topics. A second questionnaire was sent to the participants to determine the extent of their agreement with each statement generated by the first questionnaire. A third questionnaire was sent, asking participants to reconsider their ratings in light of the group's responses and to choose the most important elements. The response rates were 83% for the first questionnaire, 70% for the second, and 76% for the third. The panel reached a high level of agreement on a definition of CDTM. Panel members also identified many critical aspects of CDTM, including what makes it worthwhile, barriers to and facilitators of engaging in CDTM, key participants, ways in which responsibility for CDTM may be shared, and the competencies needed for CDTM. An expert panel of health care leaders and future leaders, within and outside the pharmacy profession, reached a high level of agreement on a definition of CDTM and identified many critical aspects of this concept.

Consumer Behavior↗

PubMed2004

The role of the clinical nurse specialist in epilepsy. A national survey.

PURPOSE: To review and describe the key roles of the UK clinical nurse specialist in epilepsy (CNSE), and to identify the specialist nurses' contribution to care through an exploration of CNSE's perceptions of their roles. METHOD: Using the Delphi technique [Applied Project Design and Analysis, 3rd ed., Churchill Livingstone, London, 2000, p. 243] a national survey of all known UK CNSEs was completed. One hundred and thirty questionnaires identifying nine key hypotheses central to the role of the CNSE were distributed and 76 valid questionnaires returned. RESULTS: The response rate was 63% and was geographically representative of the UK population of CNSEs. CNSEs were employed in a range of hospital and community settings with differing patient groups. Seventy-two percent of respondents held higher academic nursing qualifications but only 36% had previous epilepsy or neurology experience. Thirty percent of respondents had been employed in the role of CNSE for more than 5 years and 84% were employed as a G or H grade nurse. Only 39% of CNSEs held nurse-led clinics and of those 32% were responsible for all decisions made during their clinic. Furthermore, 40% of CNSEs saw new patients who had not previously been reviewed by one of the medical team. The level of responsibility for drug management was mainly at a monitoring and advisory level but a small number of CNSEs held much greater responsibility. The responses to the nine hypotheses were compared using cross tabulations. CONCLUSION: The findings of the study and the review of the CNSE in the UK revealed that the key roles of the CNSE were difficult to define. Yet, the respondents identified that there were common core features central to their contribution to care as specialist nurses.

Delphi Technique↗

PubMed2006

Health Research Profile to assess the capacity of low and middle income countries for equity-oriented research.

BACKGROUND: The Commission on Health Research for Development concluded that "for the most vulnerable people, the benefits of research offer a potential for change that has gone largely untapped." This project was designed to assess low and middle income country capacity and commitment for equity-oriented research. METHODS: A multi-disciplinary team with coordinators from each of four regions (Asia, Latin America, Africa and Central and Eastern Europe) developed a questionnaire through consensus meetings using a mini-Delphi technique. Indicators were selected based on their quality, validity, comprehensiveness, feasibility and relevance to equity. Indicators represented five categories that form the Health Research Profile (HRP): 1) Research priorities; 2) Resources (amount spent on research); 3) Production of knowledge (capacity); 4) Packaging of knowledge and 5) Evidence of research impact on policy and equity. We surveyed three countries from each region. RESULTS: Most countries reported explicit national health research priorities. Of these, half included specific research priorities to address inequities in health. Data on financing were lacking for most countries due to inadequate centralized collection of this information. The five main components of HRP showed a gradient where countries scoring lower on the Human Development Index (HDI) had a lower capacity to conduct research to meet local health research needs. Packaging such as peer-reviewed journals and policy forums were reported by two thirds of the countries. Seven out of 12 countries demonstrated impact of health research on policies and reported engagement of stakeholders in this process. CONCLUSION: Only one out of 12 countries indicated there was research on all fronts of the equity debate. Knowledge sharing and management is needed to strengthen within-country capacity for research and implementation to reduce inequities in health. We recommend that all countries (and external agencies) should invest more in building a certain minimum level of national capacity for equity-oriented research.

Africa↗

PubMed1998

Objectives of genetic counselling: differing views of purchasers, providers and users.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the views of purchasers, providers and users about the objectives of genetic counselling. METHODS: A modified Delphi technique was used, incorporating two postal questionnaires that were sent to six study groups with a three-month interval: purchasers (public health doctors (n = 37) and regional advisers in general practice (n = 35)); providers (clinical geneticists (n = 33) and genetic counsellors (n = 25)); and users (out-patients (n = 36) and members of genetic support groups (n = 32)). The response rate for the first questionnaire was 115/198 (58 per cent) and for the second, 102/198 (52 per cent). The first questionnaire asked an open-ended question about what the objectives of genetic counselling should be and asked respondents to rank order them. The second questionnaire summarized the views expressed in the first questionnaire and asked respondents to rank order the most frequently cited and most highly ranked five objectives. RESULTS: The five most frequently cited and highly ranked objectives from Questionnaire One were, in descending order: provide information, give support, facilitate decision-making, assess risk and achieve understanding. In response to Questionnaire Two, purchasers differed from providers and users in rating 'facilitate decision-making' more highly than did providers and users. By contrast, providers and users rated 'give information' more highly than did purchasers. CONCLUSIONS: Purchasers hold different views from providers and users about what the objectives of genetic counselling should be. This raises two questions: (1) Which views are or should be most influential in the future development of genetic counselling? (2) By what processes can more than one view on genetic counselling be integrated?

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMed2001

Research priorities in occupational health in Italy.

OBJECTIVE: To find a broad consensus on research priorities and strategies in the field of occupational health and safety in Italy. METHODS: A two phase questionnaire survey was based on the Delphi technique previously described in other reports. 310 Occupational safety and health specialists (from universities and local health units) were given an open questionnaire (to identify three priority research areas). The data obtained from respondents (175, 56.4%) were then used to draw up a list of 27 priority topics grouped together into five macrosectors. Each of these was given a score ranging from 1 (of little importance) to 5 (extremely important). With the mean scores obtained from a total of 203 respondents (65.4%), it was possible to place the 27 topics in rank order according to a scale of priorities. RESULTS: Among the macrosectors, first place was given to the question of methodological approach to research in this field, and for individual topics, occupational carcinogenesis and quality in occupational medicine were ranked first and second, respectively. The question of exposure to low doses of environmental pollutants and multiple exposures ranked third among the priorities; the development of adequate and effective approaches and methods for worker education and participation in prevention was also perceived as being an important issue (fourth place). CONCLUSIONS: This study (the first of its kind in Italy) enabled us to achieve an adequate degree of consensus on research priorities related to the protection of occupational health and safety. Disparities in the mean scores of some of the issues identified overall as being research priorities, seem to be linked both to geographical area and to whether respondents worked in local health units or universities. This finding requires debate and further analysis.

Decision Making↗

PubMed1994

A Delphi study on research priorities for trauma nursing.

OBJECTIVES: To identify and prioritize research questions of importance to trauma patient care and of interest to trauma nurses. METHOD: A three-round Delphi technique was used to solicit, identify, and prioritize problems for trauma nursing research. In round 1, experienced trauma nurses (N = 208) generated 513 problems, which were analyzed, categorized, and collapsed into 111 items for subsequent rounds. Round 2 participants rated each research question on a 1 to 7 scale on two criteria: impact on patient welfare and value for practicing nurses. Group median scores provided by 166 round 2 respondents and respondents' individual round 2 scores were indicated on the round 3 questionnaire. Subjects rated the questions again on the same criteria and indicated whether nurses, independently or in collaboration with other health professionals, should assume responsibility for that research. Median and mean scores and rank order were determined for each item. RESULTS: Respondents who completed all three rounds (n = 137) had a mean of 8.3 years of trauma experience. Nine research questions ranked within the top 20 on both criteria. The two research questions that ranked highest on both criteria were: What are the most effective nursing interventions in the prevention of pulmonary and circulatory complications in trauma patients? and What are the most effective methods for preventing aspiration in trauma patients during the postoperative phase? The third-ranked question regarding patient welfare was: What psychological and lifestyle changes result from traumatic injury? Regarding value for practicing nurses, What are the most effective educational methods to prepare and maintain proficiency in trauma care providers? ranked third. CONCLUSION: These research priorities provide impetus and direction for nursing and collaborative investigation in trauma care.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Development of a numeric Health Care Worker Risk-Assessment Scale to evaluate potential for blood-borne pathogen exposures.

BACKGROUND: An attempt to develop a Health Care Worker Risk Assessment Scale to evaluate potential for exposure to blood-borne pathogens was made in late 1989 through 1990. The research questions were as follows: (1) Can a scale be developed to assign weights to variables that influence health care workers' risk of exposure to blood-borne pathogens? (2) If so, what variables would be included? METHODS: A five-round Delphi technique was used with 26 panel members from 15 U.S. states and the United Kingdom who were recognized experts in strategies to reduce health care workers' risk of exposure to blood-borne pathogens. The scale included four elements, each scored up to 40 points. Elements were as follows: (1) potential route of exposure, (2) experience of health care worker and cooperation of patient, (3) prevalence of blood-borne pathogens, and (4) difficulty in managing the situation. A minimum score of 20 indicated an extremely low-risk situation; a maximum score of 160 indicated an extremely high-risk situation. RESULTS: Consensus was achieved among the panel members in identifying the elements that contributed to risk for exposure to blood-borne pathogens and in applying the scale to carefully worded vignettes. This required several modifications of both the scale and the vignettes to ensure consistent interpretation of the terms used. In all vignette situations, the risk-abatement strategy was specific to the situation depicted in the vignette and not to the task itself; the value of a numeric scale is thus questionable. CONCLUSIONS: Even with the participation of 26 expert panelists, we were unable to develop a numeric scale to objectively quantify risk in such a way that risk-reduction strategies could be based on the scale rather than on the specific risk elements in a situation. Instead of attempting to use a scale such as this to quantify risk objectively, educators or clinicians may be better advised to teach health care workers the four scale elements so that health care workers can subjectively use these elements to evaluate and modify their own risk situations.

Blood-Borne Pathogens↗

PubMed2000

The identification by physiotherapists of the physical problems resulting from a mild traumatic brain injury.

In New Zealand, over 9000 people are diagnosed with a traumatic brain injury (TBI) each year, with at least 80% being classified as mild. The cognitive deficits resulting from mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) have been well documented, but this is not the case for the physical problems. As a result, the physical problems are not well understood and few people with a MTBI are referred for physiotherapy. The aim of this research was to use a modified Delphi Technique to gain consensus amongst physiotherapists working with TBI clients with regard to: (1) The common motor performance problems associated with MTBI; (2) The importance of assessing these motor performance problem; and (3) Whether these motor performance problems should be used in a formal assessment (FA) or included as a screening measure (SM). Following a pilot study to establish face validity and clarity of instructions, a national sample of 52 physiotherapists with a minimum of 1 year's experience working with TBI clients was recruited. In Round 1, 42 physiotherapists listed 424 physical problems which, in their clinical experience, may occur in people with a recent MTBI. A planning committee developed these listed problems into 33 items. In Round 2, these items were then rated by the physiotherapists as to their importance of being included in an assessment. Using 75% consensus criteria, 31 items were deemed as being at least 'important' for inclusion. In Round 3, the physiotherapists were asked whether these items should be used in a FA or used as a SM. Of the 31 items which were retained, seven reached consensus for FA (balance with unstable, reduced or changing base of support; dynamic standing balance; high level balance activities; quality of movement; ballistic activities; gait; proprioception). Five items reached consensus for being used as a SM (attention; behaviour; sport and leisure activities; vocational activities; quality of movement). Consensus of classification was not reached for the remaining 19 items which had previously been identified in Round 2 as being at least 'important' to be assessed. These results form the foundation for the development of an assessment/management protocol for physiotherapists working with adults with MTBI.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Delphi study in the identification of research need in occupational medicine in Italy].

The aim of the study was to identify the research priorities and strategies in Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) in Italy with a high degree of consensus. Based on the Delphi technique, a two-phase questionnaire was sent to experts at Universities, Local Health Units (ASLs) and Trade Unions. In the first phase, experts were requested to indicate three research topics in the OSH sector. A total of 27 topics for both universities and ASLs and 18 topics for Trade Unions were identified. In the second phase, experts were requested to assign a score from one (low relevance) to five (high relevance) to each topic previously identified. On the basis of a mean score reported for each topic, two ranked lists of priorities, one referred to universities and ASLs the other referred to Trade Unions, were formulated. The highest priority identified by universities and ASLs was occupational carcinogenesis, followed by quality in occupational medicine. Workers' information, education and participation was also identified with a high degree of priority. For Trade Unions, occupational cancers as well as training, information, participation and prevention awareness had the highest priority. Trade Unions also identify small-industries and occupational accidents as topics with high priority for research development. This study allowed a high degree of consensus to be reached regarding the research priorities in the OSH sector in Italy. Differences in the topics identified, or regarding the mean score of topics commonly identified, were related to the origin of the expert recruited to this study (University, ASLs or Trade Unions) and, for universities and ASLs, to the geographical area. In the authors' opinion, the full transfer of existing scientific data to occupational health practice and the harmonization of the priorities identified by this investigation are crucial if the research needs in the OSH sector in Italy are to be met.

Delphi Technique↗

PubMed1996

Which groups of patients benefit from helicopter evacuation?

BACKGROUND: The evacuation of emergency cases by air, usually by helicopter, is controversial because of the cost of the programme, the possibility of an accident (especially in an urban area), and unproven benefit. But such evacuations cannot be studied by a random intervention (eg, air versus ground ambulance). We used an expert-panel approach to estimate the health outcome for patients transferred by emergency helicopter compared with the potential outcome if they had gone by surface ambulance. METHODS: The helicopter programme is based at the University Hospital of Tromsø in northern Norway. 370 case-reports of helicopter evacuation from rural areas were screened by anaesthetists for routine and case-specific data. Two expert panels assessed the cases for potential additional health benefit arising from the fact of helicopter evacuation. The panels used a modified Delphi technique to reach consensus in life-years gained. One panel met for cases aged under 15 and pregnant women, the other for older cases. FINDINGS: 240 of the 370 cases were male (65%); the age range for both sexes was 0-86 years. The most common diagnosis for the 55 cases aged under 15 was infection (49%); in older patients, cardiovascular disease dominated (50%). Trauma accounted for just under a fifth of cases in both groups. On average, the patients arrived 69 min (range 0-615) earlier in hospital than if they had gone by ground transport. For 283 cases, the initial screening by the anaesthetists indicated no additional benefit compared with that obtainable by ground-ambulance transport. The main reason was that no treatment was given during the flight or early on in hospital that could not have been given otherwise. 90 cases entered the expert panel system. Of these 90, 49 cases were judged to have received no additional benefit. This left 41 (11% of the total of 370 evacuated) who were judged to have benefited, gaining 290.6 life-years. 96% of the total number of life-years gained was achieved in nine patients, six of whom were aged below 7 (four were aged 0-7 months). The life-year-gain per adult patient with cardiovascular disease was 0.54. INTERPRETATION: We conclude that an emergency helicopter service can provide considerable health benefits for selected patients, at least in this rural setting. Given the costs and risks of such a service, the benefits for most patients are small.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Improving the National Board of Medical Examiners internal Medicine Subject Exam for use in clerkship evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a consensus opinion on modifying the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) Medicine Subject Exam (Shelf) to: 1) reflect the internal medicine clerkship curriculum, developed by the Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM) and the Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine (CDIM); 2) emphasize knowledge important for a clerkship student; and 3) obtain feedback about students' performances on the Shelf. DESIGN: Two-round Delphi technique. PARTICIPANTS: The CDIM Research and Evaluation Committee and CDIM members on NBME Step 2 Committees. MEASUREMENTS: Using 1-5 Likert scales (5 = highest ratings), the group rated test question content for relevance to the SGIM-CDIM Curriculum Guide and importance for clerkship students' knowledge. The Shelf content is organized into 4 physician tasks and into 11 sections that are generally organ system based. Each iteration of the Shelf has 100 questions. Participants indicated a desired distribution of questions by physician task and section, topics critical for inclusion on each exam, and new topics to include. They specified the types of feedback clerkship directors desired on students' performances. Following the first round, participants viewed pooled results prior to submitting their second-round responses. RESULTS: Of 15 individuals contacted, 12 (80%) participated in each round. The desired distribution by physician task was: diagnosis (43), treatment (23), mechanism of disease (20), and health maintenance (15). The sections with the most questions requested were the cardiovascular (17), respiratory (15), and gastroenterology (12) sections. The fewest were requested in aging/ethics (4) and neurology, dermatology, and immunology (5 each). Examples of low-rated content were Wilson's Disease, chancroid and tracheal rupture (all <2.0). Health maintenance in type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease all received 5.0 ratings. Participants desired feedback by: section (4.6) and physician task (3.9), on performances of the entire class (4.0), and for individual students (3.8). CONCLUSION: Clerkship directors identified test content that was relevant to the curricular content and important for clerkship students to know, and they indicated a desired question distribution. They would most like feedback on their students' performance by organ system-based sections for the complete academic year. This collaborative effort could serve as a model for aligning national exams with course goals.

Clinical Clerkship↗

PubMed2005

Development of an instrument measuring Chinese adolescent beliefs and attitudes towards substance abuse.

AIM: To develop an instrument measuring the beliefs and attitudes of Chinese adolescents towards substance abuse. BACKGROUND: It is documented that many negative consequences for youth, including physical, mental and psychosocial health problems are associated with substance abuse. There has led to a growing concern about promoting anti-drug education among health care professionals in Hong Kong. It is therefore important to conduct research on substance abuse to promote more effective anti-drug programmes for adolescents. To conduct research on the above aspect, valid and reliable instruments for measuring factors associated with drug abuse are needed. An instrument, namely the Beliefs and Attitudes of Substance Abuse Inventory (BASAI) was developed for the purpose of this study. DESIGN AND METHODS: Both qualitative and quantitative approaches to instrument development were adopted in the study. There were two phases to the study. Relevant literature and the Delphi technique were employed in the first phase of the study. A panel of experts was interviewed for the development of a pool of items for the instrument. Content analysis was used to manage the qualitative data obtained from the interviews. Factor analysis was used for the psychometric testing of the items of the BASAI. A Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to test the internal consistency of the instrument. The standard error of the mean (SEM) was measured to further support the reliability of the BASAI. The results are estimates of the validity and reliability of the instrument. RESULTS: Three main categories and nine sub-categories were derived from the interview data in the first phase of the study. The overall inter-rater reliability of the categories was 0.89 (kappa statistics). In the second phase, a Content Validity Index (CVI) of 0.92 for the instrument was achieved with the assistance of another panel of experts. The factor structure of the instrument was identified by undertaking a Principal Component Analysis. Three factors were extracted with a total variance account of approximately 70%. Reliability was established with alpha = 0.82 for the entire scale and a range of 0.78-0.92 between the sub-scales of the instrument. A small SEM of 3.21% was calculated to further support the reliability. CONCLUSION: A culturally sensitive instrument was developed with a satisfactory level of validity and reliability. Further research is recommended to continuously improve and refine the instrument so that it can be useful currently in research and/or practice. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: To promote the healthy development of children and adolescents, child health professionals need to implement effective health promotion strategies including anti-drug programmes. The instrument that was developed in this study will hopefully contribute to the development of more effective and evidence-based anti-drug programmes for youths.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Factors related with the family physician work's effectiveness and efficiency: a Delphi study in the province of Alicante].

OBJECTIVE: [corrected] To detect factors that more directly restrict effectiveness and efficiency of the family physician's work in the health center. Made proposals for change which will contribute to increase this efficiency and effectiveness. METHOD AND PARTICIPANTS: Consensus method by Delphi technique. Thirty experts, from different settings of the National Health System at the province of Alicante, were requested for participate in this study: 15 health center co-ordinators, 7 directors of district primary care services and 8 chairmen of internal medicine hospital services. Twenty-four experts maintained their participation in all phases of the project, that means 80% of participation. RESULTS: The factors identified with a larger consensus (supported by at least 83% of the participants) were: difficulties in the relationship and communication between primary and secondary care levels; lack of incentives or motivation in manpower policy; vertical health programs not realistic and not well co-ordinated; a society each time more medicalized; deficiencies in the makeup of the general practitioners patients listś; political influences in management; excessive bureaucracy on consultations; deficiencies in continuing medical education; lack of prefixed aims and previously set criteria of standards; different training and involvement levels among professionals; limited access to diagnostic tests and a limited health education level among the population. The solutions proposed with a larger consensus (supported by at least 92% of the participants) were: to improve and increase communication between primary and secondary care levels; to makeup the patient list of every general practitioner and to adjust the staff of the health centers according to sociodemographic population variables and professional duties (practice, management, teaching, research,.); to design programs of continuing medical education with obligatory attendance for professionals; to incentive and to motivate professionals; to professionalize and depoliticize management; reduction of unnecessary bureaucracy on consultations by computing some tasks; to establish guidelines in practice; to introduce the Individual Health Card; self-management in health centers; to increase the primary care capacity in solving health problems; freedom of choice of the specialist consultant by the general practitioner; to release the access for the general practitioners to certain diagnostic tests; to improve certain social services and to increase the time that health center co-ordinators devote to managerial tasks. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the problems identified and the solutions proposed were linked either with organisational or managerial factors or with human resources management. The essences of the new primary care model are not questioned. Other Spanish publications which investigated the opinion of health professional as well, have identified similar problems and proposed similar solutions. This coincidence and the high degree of agreement reached by the participants in designing problems and in proposing solutions, may indicate that factors that most restrict the effectiveness and the efficiency of the family physicians work in health centers are clearly explained and it is necessary to deal with the solutions resolutely.

Delphi Technique↗

PubMed2000

Preoperative preparation. Value, perspective, and practice in patient care.

Preanesthesia preparation will continue to stimulate creativity and debate. Strategies for process improvement will take various shapes and require tools previously unfamiliar to many medical managers. At UNC Health System, anesthesiologists currently are committed to the centralized preanesthesia clinic approach used in PreCare. To date, their strategies have been validated by their institutional measures of success: a 0.7% first-case AM work-up rate, a 5% no PreCare visit rate, a 5% consent problem rate, and a 0% rejected specimen rate, with a 43% blood-draw rate for all patients. As their health system expands, however, other strategies and preparation modalities may become necessary. Telemedicine and Internet-dependent processes are appealing in the highly educated and technologically sophisticated marketplace. As the region becomes increasingly urbanized, local employment patterns prevent easy access to services, and functional compromises, such as bypassing PreCare or reliance on telephone or on-line interviews for preparation, may become necessary. The need to expand PreCare in the near future is already evident. As was found during initial planning, process improvement and space planning are enhanced by computer modeling. UNC Health System employed a proprietary animated simulation modeling (ASM) tool, MedModel, (ProModel, Orem, UT), although other techniques exist for the same purpose. Use of ASM as a strategy management tool allowed generation of ideal space-time-personnel scenarios that could expose potential problems before resources and physical restructuring occurred. ASM also can be used to compare data obtained from real-time observations to any reference scenario, including any that looks at economic measures of process, to help refine strategic visions before instituting tactical solutions. Used in this manner, ASM can reveal physical, temporal, personnel, and policy-related factors not otherwise seen as exerting effects on overall preprocedural preparation processes. Coupled with other classic planning techniques, such as time-motion studies, modified Delphi techniques, customer satisfaction surveys, benchmarking studies, and financial analysis and growth projections, ASM has helped enhance total quality management efforts in PreCare and other planning projects at UNC Health System. Other researchers have used other simulation techniques to assess clinic functions. Operational challenges that exist in preanesthesia preparation clinics place these clinics on the same level as other kinds of medical service clinics. The lessons learned in most clinic settings may be applied in a cross-wise manner to the preanesthesia clinic. Dexter contends that efficient delivery of care that respects patients' time and needs does more than assist the procedural preparation process; it also supports the physician's ethical obligation to the patient to give the best possible care. Documenting patient medical information, education efforts, and maintaining the medical-legal integrity of the preanesthesia preparation materials is another area of increasing concern and research. When hand-held computers capable of linking by way of infrared technologies or that use rented downloadable software to run specific applications become commonly used, the complexity of ensuring privacy will grow. The complexity, however, will not be insurmountable. Privacy problems exist in any information management system, whether paper-based (i.e., reducing redundant forms, eliminating indiscriminant photocopying of records), electronic-based (i.e., encryption, server access, system failure), or both. Electronic conveyance of medical information faces more legal and economic than technical hurdles. The penetration in US households of Internet services presently is less than 40%, whereas the penetration of personal computers is just over 50%. These figures are compared with penetration of corded telephones, televisions, and radios at levels greater tha

Anesthesiology↗

PubMed1998

The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus.

Most systematic reviews rely substantially on the assessment of the methodological quality of the individual trials. The aim of this study was to obtain consensus among experts about a set of generic core items for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The invited participants were experts in the field of quality assessment of RCTs. The initial item pool contained all items from existing criteria lists. Subsequently, we reduced the number of items by using the Delphi consensus technique. Each Delphi round comprised a questionnaire, an analysis, and a feedback report. The feedback report included staff team decisions made on the basis of the analysis and their justification. A total of 33 international experts agreed to participate, of whom 21 completed all questionnaires. The initial item pool of 206 items was reduced to 9 items in three Delphi rounds. The final criteria list (the Delphi list) was satisfactory to all participants. It is a starting point on the way to a minimum reference standard for RCTs on many different research topics. This list is not intended to replace, but rather to be used alongside, existing criteria lists.

Delphi Technique↗

PubMed2006

Consensus guidelines on sedation and analgesia in critically ill children.

OBJECTIVE: The United Kingdom Paediatric Intensive Care Society Sedation, Analgesia and Neuromuscular Blockade Working Group is a multi-disciplinary expert panel created to produce consensus guidelines on sedation and analgesia in critically ill children and forward knowledge in these areas. Sedation and analgesia are recognised as important areas of critical care practice and adult clinical practice guidelines in these fields remain amongst the most popular of those produced by the Society of Critical Care Medicine. However, similar clinical practice guidelines have not previously been produced for the critically ill paediatric patient. DESIGN: A modified Delphi technique was used to allow the Working Group to anonymously consider draft recommendations in three Delphi rounds with predetermined levels of agreement. This process was supported by a total of four consensus conferences. Once consensus had been reached, a systematic review of the available literature was carried out. OUTCOME: A set of consensus guidelines was produced including 20 key recommendations, 10 relating to the provision of analgesia and 10 relating to the sedation of critically ill children. An evaluation of the existing literature supporting these recommendations is provided. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-disciplinary consensus guidelines for maintenance sedation and analgesia in critically ill children have been successfully produced and are supported by levels of evidence (excluding sedation and analgesia for procedures and excluding neonates). The working group has highlighted the paucity of high-quality evidence in these important clinical areas and this emphasises the need for further randomised clinical trials in this area.

Analgesia↗

PubMed2004

[Qualitative research: a valid alternative].

OBJECTIVE: To describe the main qualitative research techniques through systematic review of Spanish studies published during the previous 5 years. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: The Indice Médico Español (bibliographic database of items published in Spanish health sciences journals) was searched, and systematic searches of the journals Atención Primaria, Gaceta Sanitaria, and Revista de Calidad Asistencial were done. Study selection. We included studies carried out with any type of qualitative research technique. Also included were studies that reviewed qualitative research techniques. We excluded studies that used a qualitative technique but were based mainly on quantitative research techniques. The review was done during the period from April 1997 to April 2002. RESULTS: Most of the studies we reviewed used only one technique (80.5%). When more than one technique was used in combination (19.5% of the articles we reviewed), focus groups and interviews were usually used. The techniques identified were focus group (used in 34% of the articles reviewed), interview (24%), the Delphi technique (10%), content analysis (8%), nominal group (8%), metaplan (2%), and Philips 6/6 (2%). CONCLUSIONS: Qualitative research is a valid alternative, and if used with appropriate methodological rigor it can be of considerable use to health care professionals.

Biomedical Research↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Identification of problems and needs in health: description of a participative experience in primary care].

OBJECTIVE: To identify health problems and needs from a Health area population. To detect inequalities in relation with sociodemographic variables. METHODS: An observational descriptive study, cross-sectional study, qualitative research. SETTING: A Health area in Cordoba divided in three different areas: residential, inner city and rural area. We select three different groups of population and the following instruments of measurements: a) general population older than 15 years old (survey by interview completed door-to-door and personally) (N = 12,801) (coverage = 96.6%); b) Representatives of the community (N = 47), by Delphi technique (answering rate = 62.5%) and Nominal Group technique applied to participants in Health Councils (answering rate = 65.4%); c) Health workers (N = 45), by Delphi Process (answering rate = 58.5%). RESULTS: The people consider pains in their joints and allergies as the priority health problems, for the representatives of the community and the health workers the most important problems were dental hygiene and some chronic diseases. The needs detected as most important were, for the people from residential area, the lack of public gardens and cultural sites, for people from the inner city area it was the lack of public safety and in the rural area it was the lack of proper health resources. CONCLUSIONS: Although the different groups we study maintain a close agreement on what are the most important health problems and needs, we observed several interesting disagreement that could be explained by the different point of view that each group has on the process of health-disease, on perceiving problems and needs and on the sociodemographic differences among them.

Adolescent↗