PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Discrimination Learning”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 361 records · Page 20Linked to original sources
PubMed1984

Chlordiazepoxide impairs the performance of a learned discrimination.

Chlordiazepoxide (CDP) (5 mg/kg) administered on four of eight sessions significantly impaired the performance of a previously learned, reinforcement-cued discrimination in male Sprague-Dawley rats. On four interspersed vehicle-injection sessions, the performance of subjects demonstrated immediate recovery and was indistinguishable from that of controls (0 mg/kg). An analysis of response components indicated that the impairment in discrimination performance was due to a "disinhibitory" effect of the drug on responding during "no-go" phases of the task. The results are discussed in the context of similarities and differences in the effect of CDP on performance and acquisition.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Preschoolers out of adults: discriminative learning with a cognitive load.

This paper explores novel predictions from the spontaneous overtraining interpretation of human discrimination shift learning (Sirois & Shultz, 1998a). Results from six experiments where adults perform a discrimination shift task with or without a cognitive distractor are reported. In three experiments with a concurrent distractor task (Experiments 1A, 2A, and 3A), performance of adults is comparable to what would be expected from preschoolers performing only the learning task. These adults show no dimensional transfer from initial learning, unless new attributes are introduced in shift learning. On the same tasks without a cognitive load (Experiments 1B, 2B, and 3B), performance is typical of normal adults. The discussion focuses on the relative ability of competing theoretical models (i.e., levels of processing, attentional mediation, and perceptual differentiation) to account for these data.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Right or wrong, familiar or novel in pictorial list discrimination learning.

The interaction between nonassociative learning (presentation frequencies) and associative learning (reinforcement rates) in stimulus discrimination performance was investigated. Subjects were taught to discriminate lists of visual pattern pairs. When they chose the stimulus designated as right they were symbolically rewarded and when they chose the stimulus designated as wrong they were symbolically penalised. Subjects first learned one list and then another list. For a "right" group the pairs of the second list consisted of right stimuli from the first list and of novel wrong stimuli. For a "wrong" group it was the other way round. The right group transferred some discriminatory performance from the first to the second list while the control and wrong groups initially only performed near chance with the second list. When the first list involved wrong stimuli presented twice as frequently as right stimuli, the wrong group exhibited a better transfer than the right group. In a final experiment subjects learned lists which consisted of frequent right stimuli paired with scarce wrong stimuli and frequent wrong stimuli paired with scarce right stimuli. In later test trials these stimuli were shown in new combinations and additionally combined with novel stimuli. Subjects preferred to choose the most rewarded stimuli and to avoid the most penalised stimuli when the test pairs included at least one frequent stimulus. With scarce/scarce or scarce/novel stimulus combinations they performed less well or even chose randomly. A simple mathematical model that ascribes stimulus choices to a Cartesian combination of stimulus frequency and stimulus value succeeds in matching all these results with satisfactory precision.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1976

Functional differentiation within the neostriatum of the rat using electrical (blocking) stimulation during discrimination learning.

Sixteen rats, eight with bipolar electrodes implanted bilaterally in the anterodorsal head of the caudate-putamen and eight with similar electrodes in the posteroventral caudate-putamen, learned a spatial and a form discrimination task and their reversals while receiving "continuous" stimulation. Rats receiving stimulation to the anterodorsal caudate-putamen were imparied on spatial reversal learning compared with the posteroventral group. On form discrimination reversal the posteroventral group were impaired compared with the anterodorsal group. This dissociation is related to the particular cortical neostriatal projection system for the region stimulated and demonstrates a behavioral differentiation in rat neostriatum comparable with that observed in the monkey.

Animals↗