PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “MITRAL VALVE STENOSIS”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 361 records · Page 20Linked to original sources
PubMed1987

A comparison of the assessment of mitral valve area by continuous wave Doppler and by cross sectional echocardiography.

Transmitral pressure half time (PHT) was assessed by continuous wave Doppler in 44 patients with rheumatic mitral valve stenosis (14, pure mitral valve stenosis; 15, combined mitral stenosis and regurgitation; and 15 with associated aortic valve regurgitation). The mitral valve area, derived from transmitral pressure half time by the formula 220/pressure half time, was compared with that estimated by cross sectional echocardiography. The transmitral pressure half time correlated well with the mitral valve area estimated by cross sectional echocardiography. The correlation between pressure half time and the cross sectional echocardiographic mitral valve area was also good for patients with pure mitral stenosis and for those with associated mitral or aortic regurgitation. The regression coefficients in the three groups of patients were significantly different. Nevertheless, a transmitral pressure half time of 175 ms correctly identified 20 of 21 patients with cross sectional echocardiographic mitral valve areas less than 1.5 cm2. There were no false positives. The Doppler formula significantly underestimated the mitral valve area determined by cross sectional echocardiography by 28(9)% in 19 patients with an echocardiographic area greater than 2 cm2 and by 14.8 (8)% in 25 patients with area of less than 2 cm2. In thirteen patients with pure mitral valve stenosis Gorlin's formula was used to calculate the mitral valve area. This was overestimated by cross sectional echocardiography by 0.16 (0.19) cm2 and underestimated by Doppler by 0.13 (0.12) cm2. Continuous wave Doppler underestimated the echocardiographic mitral valve area in patients with mild mitral stenosis. The Doppler formula mitral valve area = 220/pressure half time was more accurate in predicting functional (haemodynamic) than anatomical (echocardiographic) mitral valve area.

Adult↗
PubMed1985

Left atrial rhabdomyosarcoma mimicking mitral valve stenosis.

A rare case of left atrial rhabdomyosarcoma is presented in a patient with symptoms of congestive heart failure mimicking a hemodynamically obstructive mitral stenosis and secondary pulmonary hypertension. Although the diagnosis of a cardiac neoplasm is often difficult, it should be suspected in any patient with idiopathic heart failure refractory to conventional therapy, or with systemic or pulmonary emboli without an obvious source. The possibility of a "tumor plop" should always be considered during auscultation of a diastolic click. If clinically suspected, echocardiography will usually establish the diagnosis and allow follow-up for recurrences. If the tumor is benign, cardiac surgery will be curative and, if malignant, chemotherapy or radiotherapy should be considered.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2006

Posterior leaflet preservation during mitral valve replacement for rheumatic mitral stenosis.

Mitral valve replacement with posterior leaflet preservation was shown beneficial for postoperative left vetricular (LV) performance in patients with mitral regurgitation. Some authors find it beneficial even for the long term LV function. We investigated a long term effect of this technique in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis. We studied 20 patents with mitral valve replacement due to rheumatic mitral stenosis, in the period from January 1988 to December 1989. In group A (10 patients) both leaflets and coresponding chordal excision was performed, while in group B (10 patients) the posterior leaflet was preserved. In all patients a Carbomedics valve was inserted. We compared clinical pre and postoperative status, as well as hemodynamic characteristics of the valve and left ventricle in both groups. Control echocardiographyc analysis included: maximal (PG) and mean (MG) gradients; effective valve area (AREA); telediastolic (TDV) and telesystolic (TSV) LV volume; stroke volume (SV); ejection fraction (EF); fractional shortening (FS) and segmental LV motion. The mean size of inserted valve was 26.6 in group A and 27.2 in group B. Hemodynamic data: PG (10.12 vs 11.1); MG (3.57 vs 3.87); AREA (2.35 vs 2.30); TDV 126.0 vs 114.5); TSV (42.2 vs 36.62); SV (83.7 vs 77.75); EF (63.66 vs 67.12); FS (32.66 vs 38.25). Diaphragmal segmental hypokinesis was evident in one patient from group A and in two patients from group B. In patients with rheumatic stenosis, posterior leaflet preservation did not have increased beneficial effect on left ventricular performance during long-term follow-up. An adequate posterior leaflet preservation does not change hemodynamic valvular characteristics even after long-term follow-up.

Echocardiography↗
PubMed1998

Traumatic damage to the mitral valve during percutaneous balloon valvotomy for critical aortic stenosis.

Percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty is now a widely accepted alternative to surgical valvotomy for patients with congenital aortic valve stenosis. Mitral valve anomalies are well known to coexist and influence the prognosis from all palliative procedures. Two cases of mitral valve injury occurring during balloon aortic valvuloplasty are reported, one an 11 month old boy, the other a 2 day old baby boy. Both cases were characterised by an unusually posterior position of the guidewire, over which the balloon was deployed. The wire, and hence the balloon, may have been placed through the tension apparatus of the mitral valve with subsequent damage to its free edge on inflation. This is at least conceptually more likely to occur if the orifice of the valve is posterior, if there is a small left ventricular cavity, or if the mitral valve itself is abnormal-features present in both cases. Possible strategies for decreasing the incidence of such damage are considered.

Aortic Valve Stenosis↗
PubMed1995

Comparative assessment of chordal preservation versus chordal resection in mitral valve replacement for mitral stenosis.

Mitral valve replacement with preserving all chordae tendineae in patients with mitral regurgitation has been proved to be beneficial for left ventricular performance in the postoperative period. To evaluate the effectiveness of this technique in patients with mitral stenosis a comparison of the hemodynamic and echocardiographic data between patients having operation with this technique (Group P, n = 15, mean age = 37.5 +/- 12 years), and those having operation with the conventional method of mitral valve replacement (Group C, n = 15, mean age = 39 +/- 10.4 years) was made. The study population was limited to patients who had no clinical evidence of coronary artery disease and if over 40 years of age had normal coronary artery anatomy on coronary arteriography; patients with no evidence of aortic stenosis and/or regurgitation; and patients who had pure mitral stenosis or mitral stenosis with slight regurgitation (Grade 2 or less) with a mean gradient across the mitral valve greater than 10 mmHg. Hemodynamic parameters improved in both groups after the operation. However, echocardiographic measurements obtained six months postoperatively revealed a significant decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction in Group C (61.33 +/- 9.29% preoperatively versus 53.2 +/- 10.3% postoperatively; p < 0.05). The difference between left ventricular ejection fraction diminution of the two groups was statistically significant (-0.71 +/- 6.28% in Group P versus -8.07 +/- 13.35% in Group C; p < 0.01). Left ventricular end systolic and end diastolic dimensions decreased in patients with preserved valves and increased in patients operated on with conventional method without reaching a statistical significance. Sizes of prosthetic valves inserted were in the same range and no significant differences were found in preoperative and postoperative comparison of the two groups in respect to effective mitral orifice area and transvalvular gradient. There were no evidence of prosthetic valve dysfunction and paravalvular leakage and no operative or late deaths. It is concluded that if it is suitable, mitral valve replacement with preservation of chordae tendineae is expected to have a beneficial effect on postoperative left ventricular performance in patients with mitral stenosis.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

[Prosthetic valve endocarditis caused by Streptococcus constellatus infection complicated with perivalvular abscess: serial observation by transesophageal echocardiography: a case report].

A 61-year-old man was admitted to an associated hospital because of fever. He had undergone aortic valve and mitral valve replacement 6 years ago, because of rheumatic aortic valve stenosis, and mitral valve stenosis and regurgitation. He had prosthetic valve endocarditis caused by a rare Streptococcus constellatus infection complicated by multiple organ failure and systemic embolism. We considered that surgical treatment was difficult, and continued antibiotic treatment. The inflammatory reaction and fever improved. Prosthetic valve endocarditis is often difficult to identify and treat. Streptococcus constellatus infection is characterized by destruction and formation of abscess. We followed up the patient by transesophageal echocardiography, and observed the course of change of the paravalvular abscess around the aortic valve from echogenic to echolucent.

Abscess↗
PubMed2002

Mitral stenosis after mitral valve repair for non-rheumatic mitral regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: Mitral stenosis after mitral valve repair for non-rheumatic mitral regurgitation is rare. METHODS: From 1990 to 1999, 478 patients had mitral valve repair for myxomatous and 40 patients had mitral valve repair for ischemic mitral regurgitation. The Carpentier annuloplasty ring (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) was used in 72 patients, the Duran ring (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) in 152, a posterior band in 221 and no ring or band in 73 patients. RESULTS: Four patients developed mitral stenosis late after mitral valve repair: 2 for myxomatous disease and 2 for ischemic mitral regurgitation. All 4 patients had Duran annuloplasty rings (sizes 25 to 31). The diagnosis of mitral stenosis was made by Doppler echocardiography. The mitral valve area in these 4 patients decreased from 2.7 cm2 (range, 2.3 to 3.2 cm2) early postoperatively to 0.85 cm2 (0.4 to 1.2 cm2) after a mean follow-up of 66 months (range, 38 to 110 months). Three patients had mitral valve replacement and the etiology of the mitral stenosis was the same in all patients (ie, pannus overgrowth on the annuloplasty ring with extension onto both leaflets rendering them stiff and immobile). The fourth patient had a mitral valve area of 1.2 cm2, which was mildly symptomatic with normal pulmonary artery pressure, and this patient has not had reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: Mitral stenosis may develop after mitral valve repair for myxomatous disease or ischemic mitral regurgitation when a Duran ring is used for annuloplasty. The stenosis is caused by pannus on the annuloplasty ring with extension onto the leaflets.

Female↗
PubMed1997

[Emergency percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty in a pregnant woman].

We report the case of a 33-year-old woman in the 28th week of pregnancy and with signs of fetal death, admitted to hospital in an emergency due to pulmonary edema secondary to severe mitral valve stenosis. Intensive medical treatment was unsuccessful and the patient was submitted to an emergency percutaneous balloon mitral valvoplasty with prompt clinical improvement. Subsequent clinical deterioration secondary to fetal death was managed by cesarean section resulting in clinical establization. The patient was discharged 10 days after admission and at 11 months after the procedure she had mild symptoms without drug therapy and echocardiographic signs of mild residual mitral stenosis (mitral valve area: 2.0 cm2).

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1998

[Relationship between mitral valve echo score and hemodynamic variables in patients with mitral stenosis].

Mitral valve echo score has been proposed as a predictor or of the outcome of balloon mitral valvotomy in patients with mitral stenosis. The relationship between mitral echo score and the hemodynamic variables was evaluated. In 41 patients with pure mitral stenosis (nine men and 32 women, aged 57.9 +/- 9.4 years), mitral echo score was estimated from two-dimensional echocardiographic findings, and mitral valve area was measured by planimetry on the two-dimensional short-axis view. Apex phonocardiography and continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic recording of transmittral flow were simultaneously performed to measure left atrial/left ventricular mean transmittral pressure gradient, pressure half-time and (Q-1)-(2-OS) interval. Linear regression analysis revealed that both mitral echo score and mitral valve area were significantly correlated with mean transmittral gradient (r = 0.522, p = 0.0005 and r = -0.651, p < 0.0001, respectively), pressure half-time (r = 0.491, p < 0.005 and r = -0.757, p < 0.0001) and (Q-1)-(2-OS) interval (r = 0.551, p < 0.0005 and r = -0.487, p < 0.005, respectively). Mitral echo score has a significant correlation with hemodynamic variables, which were comparable to but slightly different from mitral valve area, in patients with mitral stenosis.

Adult↗
PubMed1981

Mitral valve A wave and mitral stenosis.

We examined M-mode echocardiograms on 35 patients with catheterization-proven mitral stenosis and normal sinus rhythm to determine whether the presence or absence of an A wave on the mitral echogram predicted mild versus severe mitral stenosis. Mitral valve area (MVA) was determined by the Gorlin formula. Presence of a mitral A wave was defined as 2 mm or greater anterior motion (after a well-defined F point) of the anterior mitral leaflet. In six of 35 patients, the presence of an A wave was equivocal. Of the remaining 29 patients, 16 had no A wave and mean MVA = 1.18 cm2 +/- 0.45 (SD), and 13 patients had a definite A wave and mean MVA = 2.04 cm2 +/- 0.71. There was a significant difference (p less than 0.001) between the mean MVA for patients with and without definite A waves. No patients with a definite A wave had an MVA less than 1.2 cm2. An A wave on the mitral echogram (in sinus rhythm) excludes severe mitral stenosis; when an A wave is not seen, no definite statement concerning severity of mitral stenosis can be made.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Mitral valve replacement under video assistance through a minithoracotomy.

Minimally invasive techniques for mitral valve replacement offer an alternative for selected patients. In this report we present a woman with recurrent mitral valve stenosis, after mitral valve repair 10 years ago, who underwent mitral valve replacement through a minithoracotomy using stereo video assistance in combination with direct vision.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Thrombolysis for prosthetic valve malfunction: case report and review.

A 40 year old female with severe mitral valve stenosis, underwent mitral valve replacement by single disc valve 4 years ago. She presented at this admission with a new onset of congestive heart failure. The prothrombin time was inadequate with international normalized ratio (INR) 1.43. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed high pressure gradient across the mitral valve. Fluoroscopy demonstrated restrictive opening of single disc motion. Intravenous thrombolysis was given for presumptive diagnosis of prosthetic valve thrombosis. The patient gradually improved and did not have to undergo surgical correction.

Adult↗