SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Neoadjuvant therapy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 361 records · Page 20Linked to original sources

PubMed1997

Application of neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy for operable breast carcinomas.

The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary breast cancer is based on sound theoretical, experimental and clinical principles. Higher objective response rates have been seen in patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma. Furthermore, when used in patients with operable breast carcinomas, sufficient downstaging has been achieved to allow for breast conservation surgery in patients who would otherwise require a mastectomy. This has been achieved without an increase in local recurrence. The anthracenedione mitoxantrone was used as part of the 3M/2M regimen in the neoadjuvant trial at the Royal Marsden Hospital, which was the first to establish within the setting of a clinical trial, the reduction in mastectomy requirements. This regimen combined high objective response rate with low symptomatic toxicity. An important benefit of neoadjuvant therapy is the opportunity to study in vivo the effects of treatment in primary breast carcinomas. The use of the primary tumour as a marker of response prior to surgery may, in the future, allow for the optimization of therapy for individual patients.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

PubMed2000

4-Year follow-up results of a European prospective randomized study on neoadjuvant hormonal therapy prior to radical prostatectomy in T2-3N0M0 prostate cancer. European Study Group on Neoadjuvant Treatment of Prostate Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term effects of 3-month neoadjuvant hormonal treatment in patients treated by radical prostatectomy for locally confined prostate cancer. METHODS: We report the results of 402 patients (220 with a clinical T2 tumor and 182 with a clinical T3 tumor) of whom 192 randomly received neoadjuvant total androgen deprivation using a LHRH analogue (goserelin) plus flutamide for a period of 3 months and 210 underwent radical prostatectomy only. RESULTS: 'Clinical downstaging' was seen in 30% of cases in the neoadjuvantly treated group (NEO). 'Pathological downstaging' occurred in 7 and 15% of cases in the direct radical prostatectomy (DP) group and the NEO group, respectively (p<0.01). In patients with clinical T2 as well as in patients with clinical T3 tumors, a significant difference in the number of positive margins was shown in favor of the NEO group (cT2, p<0.01; cT3, p = 0.01). This advantage, although there was a trend in favor of the NEO group, specifically in cT2 tumors, did not translate in a significantly better PSA progression rate (p = 0.18). However, when evaluating the local control rate in cT2 tumors, we observed local recurrence in 3 of 102 (3%) patients in the NEO group versus 12 of 114 (11%) patients in the DP group. The difference is statistically significant (p = 0.03). In the cT3 group, this difference was not statistically significant (NEO group: 15 of 87 (17%), and DP group: 21 of 95 (22%) patients; p = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the clinical revelance of pathological downstaging and the lower percentage of patients with positive margins in the neoadjuvantly treated group with a clinical T2 tumor is not confirmed by a lower PSA progression rate. However, this study indicates that there may be a trend that this advantage in favor of the NEO group directly translates into a better local control rate in clinical T2 tumors. Better local control in cT2 tumors is only going to be of relevance if subsequently you can show that there is a better survival for these patients. Unfortunately, this article reports a study which is not yet mature enough to show relevant information. Presently, neoadjuvant therapy should not be given outside clinical research settings.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗

PubMed2006

Impact of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy on dose-volume histograms in patients with localized prostate cancer under radical radiation therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Prostate volume involves a defined toxicity predictor in the radiation therapy of localized prostate cancer. Neoadjuvant hormone therapy (nHT) can reduce prostate volume and, therefore, the planned volume. The objective of this study was to establish if the value of nHT reduces the planned volume and if this reduction correlates with a reduction of the dose received in the target organs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 28 patients diagnosed of localized prostate cancer and referred to our departments for radiation therapy with radical intention, in the period ranging between April 2002 and October 2003, were included prospectively. The patients received nHT (triptorelin + flutamide) for 2 months and adjuvant HT until completing 2 years in the high-risk cases. A transrectal ultrasound study was performed in all patients, simulation CT and planning before the start of HT and after 2 months of treatment. The radiation therapy was carried out with 6 or 18 MV LINAC photons, with a dose fractioning scheme of 5 x 180-200 cGy, a total dosage of 66-72 Gy to prostate, 56 Gy to seminal vesicles and, in the high-risk cases, 46 Gy to pelvic lymph nodes. RESULTS: The distribution according to risk group was: low risk 3.6%, intermediate risk 28.6% and high risk 67.9%. By transrectal ultrasound, prostate volume on diagnosis was 50.65 cc pre HT and 38.97 cc post HT (p < 0.001), which means a volume reduction of 24%. The comparative analysis of the dose-volume histograms of the first versus the second CT shows a reduction in the planned volume GTV1 (prostate) (81.33 cc vs 63.96 cc, p < 0.05), PTV1 (prostate and margin) (197.51 cc vs 168.38 cc, p < 0.001) and PTV2 (prostate, vesicles and margin) (340.5 cc vs 307.26 cc, p < 0.05), a reduction of the maximum dose in the seminal vesicles (70.2 versus 68.75 Gy, p < 0.05), a reduction of the mean dose in the seminal vesicles (65.07 Gy versus 63.07 Gy, p < 0.05), PTV2 (67.72 Gy versus 66.9 Gy, p < 0.01) and PTV3 (prostate, vesicles, pelvic lymph nodes and margin) (58.86 Gy versus 57.21 Gy, p < 0.01), a reduction of the D90 in the seminal vesicles (61.83 Gy versus 60.06 Gy, p < 0.05) and PTV2 (61.04 Gy versus 59.45 Gy, p < 0.05) and a reduction of V60 of the rectum (32.45% versus 28.22%, p < 0.05) and V60 of the bladder (41.78% versus 31.67%, p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant hormone therapy reduces significantly prostate volume and as a result the planned volume and consequently the rectal and bladder V60 can be significantly reduced.

Aged↗

PubMed1998

A reduction in the requirements for mastectomy in a randomized trial of neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy in primary breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: A prospective randomised trial was undertaken to evaluate the role of neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy prior to surgery in primary operable breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred nine women (median age 56 years, range 27-70) with primary operable breast cancer confirmed on fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology were recruited to this study. They were treated with a combination of mitozantrone and methotrexate (+/- mitomycin-C) combined with tamoxifen (2MT). Patients received eight cycles of 2MT (four prior to surgery in the neoadjuvant group) and tamoxifen for five years with appropriate surgery and radiotherapy. The two groups were comparable for age, menopausal status, stage and surgical requirements. RESULTS: The clinical response rates to neoadjuvant therapy were as follows: 22% complete response (CR), 29% minimal residual disease (MRD), 33% partial response (PR), 15% no change (NC) and only two patients had clinical evidence of progressive disease. Surgical requirements were reduced from 31 patients (22%) of the adjuvant group having mastectomy to 14 (10%) in the neoadjuvant group (P < 0.003). At a median follow-up of 48 months (range 10-70 months) there is no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of local relapse, metastatic relapse or overall survival. Symptomatic and haematologic acute toxicity was low and similar for adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy. CONCLUSION: This randomised trial has shown a significant reduction in the surgical requirements for mastectomy, after treatment with neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy, with no deterioration in local or distal relapse.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Comparative evaluation of blood plasma and tumor tissue amino acid pool in radiation or neoadjuvant preoperative therapies of breast cancer with the antitumor drug Ukrain.

This study comparatively evaluated free amino acid pool formation in patients with T1-3N0-2M0 breast cancer treated with the drug Ukrain (25 patients, i.v. 100 mg/course) in combination with preoperative radiation or neoadjuvant therapies (25 subjects, total dose 20 Gy). All the patients underwent radical mastectomy. Preoperative radiation did not essentially change the range of the blood plasma parameters studied. However, we observed decreased concentrations of blood plasma ornithine and citrulline and a reduced content of aminobutyric acid, as compared with levels on admission, which may indicate an acceleration of detoxication processes in the liver. In comparison with healthy mammary gland tissue, the tumor tissue of the patients subjected to radiation therapy showed 1.5- to twofold increased concentrations of cysteate, taurine, aspartate, glutamate, proline, glycine, alanine, valine, tyrosine and histidine, which substantiates the idea of tumor tissue being a trap for numerous energy and plastic substrates and indicates active transport of the above compounds into the tumor. The application of Ukrain had virtually no influence on concentrations of the majority of blood plasma amino acids and derivatives: the total concentration of the compounds studied as well as the essential and nonessential amino acid pools remained unchanged. As compared with healthy breast tissue, the considerably increased levels of thiol-containing amino acids, such as methionine, cystine, cysteate and taurine, in the tumor tissue of patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy with Ukrain, indicates high activity of trans-sulfuration processes in this tissue. Simultaneously, in contrast to radiation therapy, Ukrain induced a marked dose-dependent increase in the concentration of proline in breast tumor tissue. The above changes were consistent with the results of the morphological study which confirmed the emergence of numerous foci of necrosis in the tumor and indicated activation of Ukrain-induced proteolytic and degradation processes in the tumor. The results obtained have led us to conclude that a mechanism of Ukrain's cancerostatic effect is to control the transport and reactions of intermediate amino acid metabolism as well as to activate proline biosynthesis in the tumor, causing enhanced development of connective tissue. It is suggested that an important practical conclusion from the present study is the lack of damaging effect of preoperative radiation therapy in the above regimen and the favorable (normalizing) action of Ukrain, at a course dose of 100 mg, on the amino acid pool formation in the organism of patients with breast cancer.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

[Impact of androgen deprivation prior to radical prostatectomy for T1, T2 prostate cancer on the likelihood of curative surgery].

BACKGROUND: Extracapsular extension is commonly seen in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer due to understaging of disease. One possible approach to reduce the likelihood of extracapsular disease is androgen deprivation prior to radical prostatectomy, neoadjuvant therapy. However, adequate application is not clear. We analyzed the outcome of neoadjuvant therapy and radical prostatectomy in an attempt to expand our understanding on indications of neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS: Forty-six selected patients with clinical T1 or T2 prostate cancer were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-two patients underwent neoadjuvant therapy (group N) that mainly consists of LH-RH agonist. The duration of neoadjuvant therapy, varied from 1 to 12 months with the mean being 4 months. Twenty-four underwent radical prostatectomy alone (group S). RESULTS: In the group N and group S, 59% and 33% had either organ confined disease (OCD) or specimen confined disease (SCD) respectively. When the patients had OCD or SCD, they were defined as surgically cured patients. In the patients with clinical stage T1b, T1c, and T2 disease, likelihood of surgical cure were 100%, 50%, 46.7% in group N, 100%, 20%, 11%, in group S respectively. In the patients with initial serum PSA less than 10 ng/ml and more than 10.1 ng/ml, likelihood of surgical cure were 83.3% and 50% in group N, 63.6% and 15.4% in group S, respectively. Likelihood of surgical cure was higher in the patients with well differentiated carcinoma both in group N and group S. All the patients with serum PSA less than 0.1 ng/ml after neoadjuvant therapy had OCD. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvent therapy could be beneficial either in the patients with moderately or in the poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of prostate especially in the group with initial serum PSA more than 10.1 ng/ml. However, in patients both with well differentiated adenocarcinoma and the initial serum PSA less than 10 ng/ml, no evidence of beneficial effect on the likelihood of OCD or SCD was observed. PSA after neoadjuvant therapy could be useful predictor for the pathological outcome.

Aged↗

PubMed1994

Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy improves the therapeutic ratio in patients with bulky prostatic cancer treated with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: To determine the extent of reduction of volume of normal tissue structures exposed to high doses of radiation therapy (RT) after administration of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) in patients with bulky, geometrically unfavorable prostatic cancers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-two patients with bulky prostatic cancers were treated with a 3 month course of neoadjuvant leuprolide acetate and eulexin prior to three-dimensional (3-D) conformal radiotherapy. Patients were included if 3-D treatment planning revealed that either > 30% of the rectal wall would receive 95% of the prescription dose (D95) (n = 13); > or = 50% of the bladder wall would receive D95 (n = 10); or that any volume of small bowel would receive > or = 65% of the prescription dose (n = 16). All patients underwent simulation and conformal treatment planning before and after NHT. Pre and posthormone cumulative dose volume histogram (DVH) calculations for all normal tissue structures were analyzed and compared for each patient. RESULTS: The median percentage of target volume reduction after NHT was 25% (range: 3-52%). Ten of 13 patients (78%) whose prehormone rectal DVH demonstrated > 30% of the rectal wall receiving D95 responded to NHT with a median 25% (range: 16-48%) reduction of rectal volume receiving the D95. A median reduction of 50% (range: 6-64%) of the bladder volume receiving D95 was observed in nine of ten patients (90%), while 13 of 16 (81%) showed a reduction of small bowel volume to a median percentage of 88% (range: 67-100%) of the prehormonal values. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy is an effective method for decreasing the size of bulky prostatic tumors as well as for optimizing the geometry of the target volume in relation to the adjacent normal tissue structures prior to radiation therapy. Such an approach allows for reduction of the volume of normal tissues exposed to high doses in the majority of treated patients. Currently, studies are underway to determine whether NHT will lead to a decreased likelihood of long-term complications associated with radiotherapy of bulky, geometrically unfavorable prostatic tumors, and permit the safe delivery of escalated dose levels using conformal treatment techniques.

Aged↗

PubMed1997

Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy: the Canadian experience.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of neoadjuvant combination therapy with the antiandrogen flutamide and a luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist administered for 3 months before radical prostatectomy, compared with surgery alone in early stage prostate cancer on histopathologic findings at surgery and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA). METHODS: A sample of 161 randomly screened patients diagnosed as having stage B (134 patients) or C (27 patients) prostate cancer were randomly assigned to radical prostatectomy alone or to 3 months of neoadjuvant combination therapy with the antiandrogen flutamide and an LHRH agonist before radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: Neoadjuvant combination therapy before radical prostatectomy decreased cancer-positive surgical margins from 33.8% in the control group to only 7.8%, thus leaving 92.2% of patients with negative margins at surgery. A net 54% improvement of staging was observed in favor of combination therapy. Organ-confined disease, on the other hand, increased from 49.3% to 77.8% of patients after 3 months of combination therapy, for a 57.8% increase in the incidence of organ-confined disease. No cancer was found in 6 (6.7%) prostatectomy specimens from the treated group. A close correlation was found between serum PSA at diagnosis and the stage of the disease at surgery. Upstaging increased from 30% at serum PSA values of 0 to 3.0 ng/mL up to 100% at serum PSA values above 15 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Although long-term follow-up of these patients is required to determine the impact on survival, the marked influence of neoadjuvant combination therapy on the stage of the disease suggests the possibility of a major improvement in the morbidity and mortality from prostate cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed1998

The role of preoperative adjuvant treatment in the management of esthesioneuroblastoma: the University of Virginia experience.

OBJECTIVE: Multidisciplinary management of esthesioneuroblastoma has effected markedly increased survival during the past 20 years. The potential for radical craniofacial surgery for complete en bloc resection, the availability of advanced neuroimaging modalities, and the incorporation of neoadjuvant therapy into treatment strategies for tumor remission have all contributed to this accomplishment. However, a standard protocol for the management of these lesions has not been accepted; preoperative radiation and chemotherapy have been advocated, but neither radiographic nor clinical response has been quantified. METHODS: Thirty-four consecutive patients with biopsy-proven esthesioneuroblastoma treated at one institution from 1976 to 1994 were reviewed to determine the effects of preoperative radiation therapy, with or without chemotherapy, on tumor size and long-term survival. RESULTS: In a multivariate regression analysis, advanced age was predictive of decreased disease-free survival (P=0.008), whereas advanced Kadish stage was associated with a borderline higher rate of disease-related mortality (P=0.056). Two-thirds of the patients showed a significant reduction in tumor burden with adjuvant therapy. Patients with response to neoadjuvant therapy demonstrated a significantly lower rate of disease-related mortality (P=0.050). In this series, the overall 5- and 10-year survival rates were 81.0 and 54.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Preoperative neoadjuvant therapy provides a valuable complement to radical craniofacial resection, leading to reduction in tumor burden. Patients experiencing reduction in tumor volume by neoadjuvant therapy demonstrate an improved prognosis.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

Diagnosis and treatment of pelvic lymph node metastasis in bladder control.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Bipedal lymphography and percutaneous fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of pelvic lymph node was done in 200 patients with bladder cancer. RESULTS: A diagnosis of metastasis to the pelvic lymph node was obtained by this method in 34 patients. Of these 34 patients, only 12 (35%) were positive or suspected of having pelvic lymph node metastasis by computed tomography. Sixteen patients (47%) had unequivocally positive or highly suspicious lymphogram and 18 patients (53%) had normal lymphogram. Seventy-eight cases, including eight FNAB-positive cases, were treated by radical cystectomy and regional lymph node dissection. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of FNAB were 57, 100, 100 and 91%, respectively. Thirteen FNAB-positive M0 patients could be treated by multimodality therapy and evaluated after neoadjuvant therapy by repeated lymphography and FNAB. All were changed to N0 by FNAB after neoadjuvant therapy. In eight patients treated by total cystectomy and lymph node dissection, four had down staged to pN0 but four had one positive node. In five follow-up cases without surgery, one had recurrent pelvic lymph node metastasis 35 months later. Cause-specific survival of these patients was 76% at 5 years and 57% at 8 years. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment diagnosis of pelvic lymph node metastasis and multimodality therapy may improve the prognosis of regional lymph node-positive bladder cancer. Because it is difficult to diagnose pN1 using FNAB, radical operation should be performed even if neoadjuvant therapy is effective and down staging is obtained.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

High-dose radiotherapy plus prolonged hormone therapy in CT2-3 prostatic carcinoma: is it useful?

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Clinical studies published in the last decade have shown the possible improvement in prognosis of patients with prostatic carcinoma undergoing radiation therapy with dose escalation or in combination with hormone therapy. However, in studies on hormone therapy, moderate doses of radiation therapy have been used, whereas in studies with high-dose radiotherapy, hormone therapy usually was not administered. Therefore, it is not clear whether the concomitant use of high doses and prolonged hormone therapy could determine an additional beneficial effect. The aim of the present study was therefore to evaluate the relative prognostic role of different dose levels (< 70 versus > or = 70 Gy) of external beam radiotherapy and of different hormone therapies (neoadjuvant only versus neoadjuvant + adjuvant). METHODS: A total of 426 patients (median age, 71 yrs; range, 51-87 yrs) underwent external beam radiotherapy (70 Gy median dose to prostate volume +/- 45 Gy to pelvic lymph nodes) and neoadjuvant hormone therapy (bicalutamide for 30 days; goserelin, 3.6 mg every 28 days starting two months before radiotherapy and for its entire duration). Dose to the prostate was < 70 Gy in 44.8% of patients and > or = 70 Gy in 55.2%. A total of 244 patients received adjuvant hormonal therapy. The distribution according to the clinical stage was 48.1% T2 and 51.9% T3. The distribution according to the Gleason score was 14.3% grades 2-4, 66.7% grades 5-7 and 19.0% grades 8-10. The distribution according to pretreatment prostate-specific antigen levels (in ng/mL) was 7.0% for 0-4, 29.3% for 4-10, 30.3% for 10-20, and 33.3% for > 20. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 35 months (range, 1-151), 81 patients (19.0%) showed biochemical recurrence, 17 patients (4.0%) showed local disease progression, and 12 patients (2.8%) showed distant metastases. Overall, 23 patients (5.4%) showed disease progression. Four patients (0.9%) died. At the time of this writing, no patient has died from prostatic carcinoma. At univariate analysis, the radiation dose delivered to the tumor and the administration of adjuvant hormone therapy were shown to be significantly correlated with biochemical disease-free survival. At multivariate analysis, the single parameter significantly correlated with biochemical disease-free survival was the radiation dose delivered to the tumor. In the subset of patients not treated with adjuvant hormone therapy, there was a significant correlation between radiation dose and biochemical disease-free survival at univariate and multivariate analysis. A similar correlation between adjuvant hormone therapy and biochemical disease-free survival was observed in the subset of stage cT3 patients at univariate and multivariate analysis. In patients undergoing combined treatment without adjuvant hormone therapy, a significant correlation was observed between clinical stage and biochemical disease-free survival, at univariate and at multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study confirmed the positive impact of radiotherapy doses > 70 Gy and of adjuvant hormone therapy in patients with locally advanced prostatic carcinoma. Owing to the lack of evidence of a correlation between radiation dose and biochemical outcome in patients undergoing prolonged hormone therapy, the role of further dose escalation in patients undergoing combined hormone and radiation therapy is still unclear.

Actuarial Analysis↗

PubMed1998

Prevalence of hot flushes during and after neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for localized prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the prevalence of hot flushes after neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. METHODS: Forty-three patients who received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding hot flushes. RESULTS: Complete information was available for 35 of the 43 patients. No hot flushes were noted in 20%; in 69%, hot flushes were noted during treatment but resolved after termination of treatment; and in 11%, hot flushes continued for at least 3 months after cessation of hormonal therapy. Analyzing the data with respect to duration of hormonal therapy showed that patients receiving neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for more than 4 months had the highest incidence of persistent hot flushes. CONCLUSIONS: Hot flushes will be noted in 80% of patients who receive neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. In approximately 10%, hot flushes will continue for a significant period after hormonal therapy is terminated. Patients should be apprised of this potential side effect.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗

PubMed2004

Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound for restaging rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy.

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) provides important information in the initial staging of patients with rectal cancer. Preoperative combined modality chemotherapy and radiation (neoadjuvant therapy) for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer may reduce local recurrence and improve survival. The accuracy of EUS restaging of rectal cancer after chemoradiation has not been extensively studied and its usefulness is unclear. The aim of this study was to verify the accuracy of EUS in staging rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in a large cohort of patients. METHODS: EUS staging was performed before and after concurrent 5-fluorouracil and hyperfractionated radiotherapy in 82 patients with recently diagnosed locally advanced rectal cancer. All patients underwent subsequent surgical resection and complete pathologic staging. RESULTS: After chemoradiation, 16 patients (20%) had no residual disease at pathologic staging. (T0N0). However, EUS correctly predicted complete response to chemoradiation in only 10 of 16 patients (63%). Overall accuracy of EUS post chemoradiation for pathologic T-stage was only 48%. Fourteen percent were understaged and 38% overstaged. EUS accuracy for N-stage was 77%. The T-category was correctly staged before surgery in 23 of the 56 responders (41%) and in 16 of 24 nonresponders (67%). EUS was unable to accurately distinguish postradiation changes from residual tumor. CONCLUSION: EUS staging of rectal cancer after chemoradiation is inaccurate, especially in the group of patients with visual and EUS evidence of response. Its routine use for staging purposes after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer should be discouraged.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer: an overlooked option?

For many oncologists, neoadjuvant treatment for breast cancer is synonymous with preoperative cytotoxic chemotherapy, regardless of tumor characteristics. Preoperative therapy with an endocrine agent is generally considered suitable only for the frail elderly or the medically unfit. However, favorable information regarding third-generation aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of all stages of breast cancer prompts a reconsideration of this bias. In light of the fact that neoadjuvant therapy with aromatase inhibitors is restricted to postmenopausal women with strongly estrogen-receptor-positive tumors, the assumption that neoadjuvant combination chemotherapy is more efficacious than a third-generation aromatase inhibitor can be reasonably questioned. It is particularly remarkable that the outcome of a comparison of adjuvant tamoxifen vs anastrozole (Arimidex)--the Arimidex, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial--in more than 6,000 patients was predicted by a neoadjuvant trial that showed an efficacy advantage for a third-generation aromatase inhibitor (letrozole [Femara]) compared to tamoxifen in a sample of 337 patients after only 4 months of treatment. The potential of the neoadjuvant setting in efforts to identify new biologic agents that could build on the effectiveness of adjuvant aromatase inhibitors is therefore beginning to be appreciated. Finally, neoadjuvant therapy with an aromatase inhibitor could be considered a sensitivity test of endocrine therapy that might be incorporated into strategies to individualize treatment according to response. For this possibility to be realized, however, a better understanding of the relationship between surrogates from the neoadjuvant setting and the long-term outcome of adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy will have to be established through practice-setting clinical trials.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗

PubMed1999

Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy in carcinoma of the prostate.

The rising incidence of and mortality from prostate cancer has generated great interest in improving the results of current methods of treatment. It is well-established that large tumour volumes and positive surgical margins are correlated with higher rates of local failure and distant metastasis. Significant decreases in both tumour volume and the rates of positive surgical margins are seen with NHT. Follow-up data from one randomized trial of hormonal therapy before RT have shown significantly improved disease-free survival, but so far there has been no benefit in overall survival. However, the addition of adjuvant hormonal therapy has been reported to improve survival. The results suggest that neoadjuvant and adjuvant hormonal therapy may be a viable option in men with locally advanced prostate cancer in whom cure is probably impossible, but disease progression can potentially be slowed. What remains to be determined is whether hormonal therapy alone can produce the same results. For younger men with clinically localized prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy is increasingly the treatment of choice. Prospective randomized trials of NHT have produced impressive statistics for decreasing the incidence of positive surgical margins, but the potential to down-stage tumours remains controversial. Follow-up serum PSA measurements have thus far shown no benefit from neoadjuvant therapy. The possibility that patients who fail biochemically, whether they are from the pretreated or control group, may simply represent a subgroup with aggressive tumours that may not respond to androgen withdrawal, has yet to be proved. As more follow-up data are analysed within the next several years, there must be a clear survival advantage if NHT is to be offered as a treatment option. Despite the potential of neoadjuvant therapy, the use of androgen withdrawal before definitive surgical treatment should be limited to clinical trials until a clearer picture emerges. Some may argue that although there is no evidence of a true advantage for NHT, neither is there evidence of harm. However, it must be recognized that androgen withdrawal therapy has side-effects and adds significantly to the overall cost of treatment. Furthermore, NHT delays definitive treatment; clearly, this can be a source of anxiety for the patient and the impact on survival is unknown. Currently, the rates of pathologically organ-confined disease are high in some subsets of patients (e.g. low-stage, low-grade and low PSA) so that NHT is unlikely to have great additional benefit. Although the influence of hormones on prostate growth has been known for many decades, we are only now elucidating the biological mechanisms of hormonal therapy. Although androgen ablation therapy has been used in men with metastatic prostate cancer for more than 50 years, further research at the cellular and molecular level is essential if we are to refine treatment modalities for both localized and advanced disease. Furthermore, until we have more follow-up data from randomized clinical trials of NHT, it cannot be considered part of the standard treatment for carcinoma of the prostate. There are still too many unknown factors; only time will tell if the initial promise of NHT will be fulfilled.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗

PubMed1999

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for prostate cancer.

Many men with early stage prostate cancer suffer relapse and/or die of their disease despite potentially curative surgery or radiotherapy. Early hormonal therapies are being combined with these local therapies, with the aim of facilitating local control and improving survival. In the surgical setting, neoadjuvant hormonal therapy reduces the rate of positive margins and extracapsular penetration, but most studies have failed to demonstrate an advantage with respect to biochemical progression. Further studies are needed to clarify the role of adjuvant therapy in surgical patients. In the radiotherapy setting, neoadjuvant hormonal therapy improves local control, although survival data is not available, and can be considered for stage T2b disease or higher. Adjuvant luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonists improve both local control and survival after radiotherapy and should be offered to all patients. Currently, the LH-RH agonists are the drugs of choice for adjuvant therapy, whereas combined androgen blockade has generally been used as neoadjuvant therapy. Monotherapy with a nonsteroidal antiandrogen has considerable potential in both settings. Areas for future studies include appropriate endpoints for clinical studies, comparative drug efficacy and the effect of treatment on quality of life.

Androgen Antagonists↗

PubMed1999

Effect of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy on prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and its prognostic significance.

PURPOSE: We studied the effect of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy on prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and assessed the effect of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on disease recurrence as measured by serum prostate specific antigen (PSA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 278 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were included in phase II and III studies evaluating radical prostatectomy alone versus radical prostatectomy following neoadjuvant hormonal therapy at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center between October 1991 and August 1996. Patient data related to prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 275 evaluable patients 145 (52.7%) had prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Of 50 patients treated with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (hormone group) 22 (44%) had a lower incidence of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia compared to 69 of 80 controls (86.3%) (chi-square test p<0.0001). Of 262 patients (95.3%) with followup PSA 44 (16.8%) had PSA recurrence at a median followup of 32 months, with a median time to recurrence of 30 months. PSA recurrence was noted in 23 of 145 patients with compared to 21 of 130 without prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (chi-square test p = 0.95), and did not significantly differ between the hormone group (25 of 142, 17.6%) and controls (19 of 130, 14.6%) (chi-square test p = 0.45). CONCLUSIONS: While patients treated with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy had significantly lower incidence of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, neither prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia nor neoadjuvant hormonal therapy significantly affected PSA recurrence at a median followup of 32 months.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗

PubMed2004

Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in primary breast cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been employed increasingly in operable breast cancer during recent years. Several randomized trials showed that the chances of breast conserving therapy are being enhanced, and that survival was not compromised by primary systemic therapy compared to adjuvant treatment. Apart from the surgical advantages of tumor downstaging and breast conservation, therapy upfront might offer the chance to predict subsequent response of an individual patient to a given agent in the adjuvant setting. Furthermore, by investigating pre- and posttreatment tumor specimens, the neaodjuvant setting might help to evaluate new predictive biological markers, assess biologic effects of new treatments, and gain insight into molecular mechanisms. For postmenopausal patients with receptor-positive disease who cannot tolerate the toxicities of chemotherapy regimens or are not eligible for immediate surgery, endocrine treatment is emerging as an attractive alternative in the neoadjuvant setting. The new third-generation aromatase inhibitors letrozole and anastrozole have been compared to tamoxifen in 3 well-designed randomized neoadjuvant phase III trials (PO24, IMPACT, and PROACT). These studies showed significantly higher response rates for letrozole than for tamoxifen, and comparable ones for anastrozole. Thus, the primary use of an aromatase inhibitor seems a feasible and safe treatment option for postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer who do not wish to or are unable to undergo immediate surgery or preoperative chemotherapy. Further neoadjuvant endocrine trials should help us to elucidate the cross-talk between the different signal transduction pathways and their role in endocrine resistance.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗