SEARCH · PubMed Health
Results for “RADIATION PROTECTION”
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
[Research on biological radiation protection. 39. On the significance of the spleen in radiation injury].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
[Current problems of radiation protection].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
[How can satisfactory radiation protection be accomplished?].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Canada's program of radiation protection.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Toxicity and radiation protective effect of WR-77913 in BALB/c mice.
The toxicity and radiation protective effect obtained by intraperitoneal injection of WR-77913 have been investigated in BALB/c mice. The toxic LD50/30 was 3574 mg/kg. When WR-77913 was given 30 min before whole body irradiation adequate protection was observed against bone marrow and gut death. Dose modifying factors of 1.91 and 1.76 for bone marrow and 1.95 and 1.80 for gut death were obtained with drug doses roughly equivalent to one half and one quarter of the maximum tolerable doses (MTD). No protective effect was observed against central nervous system injury. Preliminary experiments with the EMT6 tumor show limited tumor protection with a dose of WR-77913 equivalent to 70 per cent of the MTD. Because of its low toxicity, adequate bone marrow and gut protection at doses equivalent to one quarter MTD and limited protection of the EMT6 tumor, WR-77913 deserves further investigation to determine its value in multiple drug dose regimens and its capability to protect other normal tissues.
Ultraviolet radiation protection factors for clothing.
There has been considerable interest and activity in Australia during recent years in providing ultraviolet radiation protection for the public and the work force. Many requests from the public and manufacturers have been received by the Australian Radiation Laboratory for the quantification of the protection provided by different articles of clothing. The laboratory has been making spectral measurements of the ultraviolet radiation transmission of materials and fabrics for a number of years and, to this date, have tested and rated > 2,000 samples. The laboratory test methods for making spectral transmission measurements of both dry and wet fabric samples are described along with the radiometric test methods to determine ultraviolet radiation transmission. A scheme to designate the amount of ultraviolet radiation protection of materials using ultraviolet protection factors is outlined and used to compare the results obtained by different test methods. Some typical measurement results are also summarized and presented.
[Radiation protection in orthopaedics: implications for clinical practice of the new regulations governing roentgen ray irradiation and radioprotection].
In 2001 or 2002, the legislator made substantial alterations to the "Röntgenverordnung" [regulations governing use of roentgen ray radiation] and "Strahlenschutzverordnung" [regulations governing radiation protection]. This was done to bring German law in line with EU Directives 96/29/Euratom (basic safety standards for the protection of the health of workers and the general public against the dangers arising from ionizing radiation) and 97/43/Euratom (health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionizing radiation in relation to medical exposure). Proper use of radiation in medicine requires that those involved in its application are aware of the biological effects of radiation. When staff and others are protected good organization and appropriate technology at the workplace can achieve a great deal. In the new directives, the radiation protection for the patient is quantified and the responsibility of the physician is clearly pointed out. The most important aim is uniform quality throughout Europe in radiological diagnosis and radiation protection.
Radiation protection systems for the final focus test beam at SLAC.
The Final Focus Test Beam (FFTB) is a new beam line at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center designed to test new beam optics concepts, hardware, and techniques necessary to achieve and measure the small spot sizes required for future generations of high-energy e+e- linear colliders. The FFTB takes a 47 GeVc-1, 1 kW electron beam at the end of the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center linear accelerator and transports it to the FFTB beam dump. A radiation protection system was designed and installed for the FFTB with the primary goal that the integrated dose equivalent outside the shielding resulting from beam loss would not exceed 10 mSv y-1. This system is comprised of shielding, a beam containment system and a personnel protection system. This paper presents various aspects of radiation safety at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center that were considered in the design of the FFTB radiation protection system. Beam tests were conducted in which the performance of various beam containment devices and the shielding effectiveness were evaluated. Preliminary results from these tests are presented.
Radiation protection in percutaneous renal surgery.
Two British centres have published the radiation doses received during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Their results were disparate. This study was performed to establish the likely exposure of the eyes and fingers of an experienced urological surgeon who creates the track into the kidney and also performs the endoscopic operation. In addition, some radioprotective gloves were evaluated. Provided that specific precautions, including a judicious use of screening, are taken, the current dose limits are unlikely to be exceeded. However, a 30% reduction in the dose limits is probable. Wearing routine radiation badges under a lead apron is an inadequate method of monitoring exposure: urologists should press for more active assistance from radiation protection officers in the monitoring of procedures in theatre and the use of ultrasound should be encouraged.
Radioisotope for occult lesion localisation (ROLL) of the breast does not require extra radiation protection procedures.
AIM OF STUDY: Dosimetry data from patients and hospital personnel involved in the use of radioisotope for occult lesion localisation (ROLL) of the breast were collected to determine the need for extra radiation protection procedures. METHODS: Sixty-three patients have been enrolled to date into a randomised trial evaluating ROLL. Two megabecquerels of (99m)Tc- MAA in a syringe was mixed with X-ray contrast medium; this was injected directly into the lesion under image guidance. A gamma-detecting probe (Neo-Probe) was used to locate the area of radioactivity. Radiation doses to all staff groups were estimated using time and motion studies and dose rate measurements at a range of distances during each stage of ROLL. RESULTS: The finger dose [FD](+/-95% CI) was considered to be the critical variable for surgeons and radiologists. Surgeon FD=9.3+/-3.3 microSv, Radiologist FD=0.5+/-0.13 microSv. Whole body doses [WBD](+/-95% CI) were estimated for other staff groups. Nurse WBD=0.4+/-0.4 microSv, porter WBD: nil, contamination and waste: nil. CONCLUSIONS: In the case of a surgeon performing 100 procedures per annum, a FD dose of approximately 1 mSv is received, well within the annual dose limit of 150 mSv. Annual WBD to assisting staff may reach 0.04 mSv, compared to an annual limit of 6 mSv. These low doses and the lack of contamination of radioactive waste indicate that no additional radiation protection measures are required.
Radiation protection at high energy electron accelerators.
An overview is presented of radiation protection at high energy electron accelerator facilities. By 'high energy' is meant the energy domain beyond a few tens of MeV, where electromagnetic showers are the determining and dominant factor for beam interactions with matter. The basic components of electron accelerators are described and their potential impact on radiation safety. The paper then concentrates on sources of prompt radiation which distinguish these machines from other accelerator facilities and briefly describe other features such as shielding or safety systems as relevant to electron machines. A more comprehensive description of these aspects can be found elsewhere in these proceedings. In addition, general concepts presented in this review are complemented and illustrated by specific examples in the authors' synchrotron radiation work in these proceedings.
[Improved radiation protection during use of closed radioactive preparations by a transport wagon on rails and a lead-shielded application table].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
[TUDIES ON BIOLOGICAL RADIATION PROTECTION. 53. THE EFFECT OF HISTAMINE ON RADIATION-INDUCED CHANGES IN AMINO ACID METABOLISM].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
[Radiation protection day 1977: what is the truth about radiation?].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Radiation protection for nurses. Regulations and guidelines.
Rules and regulations of federal agencies and state radiation protection programs provide the bases for hospital policy regarding radiation safety for nurses. Nursing administrators should work with the radiation safety officer at their institutions to ensure that radiation exposures to staff nurses will be as low as reasonably achievable and that special consideration will be given to pregnant nurses. Nurses' fears about their exposure to radiation can be greatly reduced through education.
[Certain aspects of radiation protection at the All-Union conference on application of radioactive isotopes and radiations].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Radiation protection awareness in non-radiologists.
The outcome of teaching the core of knowledge to clinicians and the impact of the POPUMET regulations was assessed using an anonymous questionnaire. 82 of 120 (76%) of non-radiologists responded, of these 37% had attended a radiation protection course. Course attendance improved knowledge of the existence of the POPUMET regulations (p < 0.0001) and the ALARA principle. Course attendance made no difference to knowledge of the relative radiation dose of various radiological procedures. An underestimation of radiation dose was made by all responders (p < 0.001). The majority of responders were not aware that patients have no annual dose limit and the majority did not know the relative radiosensitivity of different organs. We have shown that despite the POPUMET regulations the majority of clinicians have not received adequate radiation protection teaching and that even if a course has been attended overall knowledge is still poor. We propose that formal compulsory teaching at undergraduate level may correct this in the future.