PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 361 records · Page 20Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Activity of estradiol and selective estrogen receptor modulators in the mouse N20.1 oligodendrocyte/astrocytes cell line.

OBJECTIVE: The mechanism through which estrogen exerts its neuroprotective and anti-neurodegenerative effects in the central nervous system is poorly understood. Human glial cells are implicated in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease and have both alpha and beta estrogen receptors (ER). We developed a glial cell model for ER function using the N20.1 mouse oligodendroglial cell line to evaluate the response of ERalpha and ERbeta to estradiol (E2), a raloxifene analog LY117018 (LY) and 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4OHT). DESIGN: We tested the ability of exogenous ER to activate transcription in response to ligands (100 nM) using the glial cell line N20.1 in a transient cotransfection assay with an ERalpha or ERbeta expression vector, an ERE-driven reporter and a Renilla luciferase transfection control. RESULTS: Endogenous ER was not detected in the N20.1 cells by Western immunoblotting. E2 stimulated both ERalpha and ERbeta on both ERE- and AP-1 driven promoters. The transcription stimulation by E2 in the ERalpha and ERbeta through the AP-1driven promoter, though significant, was not of the same magnitude as the stimulation of the ERalpha through the ERE-driven promoter. 4OHT and LY did not show significant transcriptional activation of either the ERalpha or ERbeta, through either the ERE or AP-1 driven promoters. LY, at a 10-fold higher concentration than E2, showed a difference in its antagonist activity on the ERbeta through the AP-1 pathway when compared with the ERE- driven promoter, demonstrating not only promoter specificity, but also receptor specificity. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first description of the activity of 4OHT and LY on estrogen receptors in glia.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

The effects of the selective estrogen receptor modulators, methyl-piperidino-pyrazole (MPP), and raloxifene in normal and cancerous endometrial cell lines and in the murine uterus.

Since estrogens have vital functions in the uterus but might also contribute to endometrial cancer, we sought to determine the in vitro effects of methyl-piperidino-pyrazole (MPP), raloxifene, and beta-estradiol on Ishikawa and RL-95 endometrial cancer, and ovine luminal endometrial (oLE) cell lines and the in vivo effects of these compounds in the rodent uterus. MPP and raloxifene (1 nM) induced significant apoptosis in the endometrial cancer and oLE cell lines compared to beta-estradiol treated and control cells (P <or= 0.0001-0.001). To determine the in vivo uterine effects of these compounds, ovariectomized wild-type (WT) and estrogen receptor-beta knockout (ERbetaKO) mice were treated with 25, 50, 100, or 150 microg of each compound. Although raloxifene caused no significant increase in uterine weight, the presumptive ERalpha antagonist, MPP (25-150 microg) increased uterine weight, and cell proliferation significantly relative to vehicle control in WT and ERbetaKO mice (P <or= 0.001). However, MPP did not increase uterine wet weight as effectively as beta-estradiol (P <or= 0.0001), and administration of either 50 microg of MPP or raloxifene effectively reversed the positive effects of 50 and 100 microg beta-estradiol. Unexpectedly, in view of the in vitro studies, MPP and raloxifene treatment of ovariectomized mice did not induce apoptosis of the luminal epithelial cells but rather these compounds induced apoptosis of the underlying uterine stromal cells. These results demonstrate that MPP and raloxifene can exert apparently contrasting in vitro versus in vivo effects, and that they have mixed agonist/antagonist action on murine uterine ERalpha in vivo.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Where do selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) now fit into breast cancer treatment algorithms?

The agents used for endocrine therapy in patients with breast cancer have changed markedly over the past decade. Tamoxifen remains the anti-oestrogen of choice, but could be replaced by the oestrogen receptor down-regulator ICI 182780 or by the fixed ring triphenylethylene arzoxifene (previously SERM III) soon. Whilst aminoglutethimide and 4-OH androstenedione were the aromatase inhibitors of choice, they have been replaced by non-steroidal (anastrozole and letrozole) and steroidal (exemestane) inhibitors of high potency and low side effect profile. Previously, often used treatments such as progestogens (megestrol acetate and medroxyprogesterone acetate) and androgens are now rarely used or confined to fourth or fifth line treatments. The LHRH agonist, goserelin, remains the treatment of choice for pre-menopausal patients with advanced breast cancer although recent randomised trials indicate a response, time to progression and survival advantage for the combination of goserelin and tamoxifen compared with goserelin alone. The newer treatments have led to questions concerning the optimum sequence of agents to use in advanced breast cancer and as neo-adjuvant and adjuvant therapy in relation to surgery. Two trials of anastrozole compared with tamoxifen and one trial of letrozole compared with tamoxifen indicate that the new triazole aromatase inhibitors have a significant advantage over the anti-oestrogen with respect to time to progression and survival. Similarly, triazole aromatase inhibitors give faster and more complete responses compared with tamoxifen when used in post-menopausal women before surgery. Major research questions remain with respect to the aromatase inhibitors used as adjuvant therapy. Anastrozole is being tested alone or in combination with tamoxifen compared with tamoxifen in the 'so-called' ATAC trial. Over 9000 patients have been randomised to this important study: the results will be available late-2001. A similar study comparing letrozole and tamoxifen started recently under the auspices of the Breast International Group. Importantly, this trial is also comparing the sequence of tamoxifen followed by letrozole (or vice versa). A similar trial of exemestane given after 2-3 years of tamoxifen compared with 5 years of tamoxifen is recruiting well as is a study comparing letrozole (or placebo) for 5 years after 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen. These studies may show that aromatase inhibitors are superior to tamoxifen or that a sequence is preferable.ICI 182780 causes complete oestrogen receptor down-regulation leading to a the lack of agonist activity of the drug. Two trials of ICI 182780 compared with anastrozole for advanced disease will report later this year and a comparison with tamoxifen next year. Arzoxifene (SERM III) is being tested against tamoxifen. These studies are likely to result in new anti-oestrogens being introduced into the clinic. Most of our endocrine treatments deprived the tumour cell of oestradiol. In vitro experiments with MCF-7 cells indicate that tumour cells can adapt and then grow in response to low oestrogen concentrations in the tissue--culture medium. Importantly, the cells were shown to apoptose in response to high oestrogen concentrations. A recent clinical trial has demonstrated a high response rate to stilboestrol given after a median of four previous oestrogen depriving endocrine therapies. These data and the newer treatments available indicate a need to re-think our general approach to endocrine therapy and endocrine prevention.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed1999

Phytoestrogens: the "natural" selective estrogen receptor modulators?

Phytoestrogens are diphenolic compounds that are present in several plants eaten by human beings. Soybeans and flaxseed are particularly abundant source of phytoestrogens. When ingested in relatively large amounts, phytoestrogens have been shown to have significant estrogen agonists/antagonists effects in animals and humans. There is epidemiological, laboratory and clinical evidence which indicates that phytoestrogens, like certain selective estrogen receptor mudulators, have an antiproliferative effect on the breast, and positive effects on the lipoprotein profile and bone density. They might also improve some of the climacteric symptoms. This evidence is critically reviewed, and the possible benefit of dietary intervention with phytoestrogen-rich food for woman's health is discussed.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2005

A pharmacophore-based evolutionary approach for screening selective estrogen receptor modulators.

We developed a pharmacophore-based evolutionary approach for virtual screening. This tool, termed the Generic Evolutionary Method for molecular DOCKing (GEMDOCK), combines an evolutionary approach with a new pharmacophore-based scoring function. The former integrates discrete and continuous global search strategies with local search strategies to expedite convergence. The latter, integrating an empirical-based energy function and pharmacological preferences (binding-site pharmacological interactions and ligand preferences), simultaneously serves as the scoring function for both molecular docking and postdocking analyses to improve screening accuracy. We apply pharmacological interaction preferences to select the ligands that form pharmacological interactions with target proteins, and use the ligand preferences to eliminate the ligands that violate the electrostatic or hydrophilic constraints. We assessed the accuracy of our approach using human estrogen receptor (ER) and a ligand database from the comparative studies of Bissantz et al. (J Med Chem 2000;43:4759-4767). Using GEMDOCK, the average goodness-of-hit (GH) score was 0.83 and the average false-positive rate was 0.13% for ER antagonists, and the average GH score was 0.48 and the average false-positive rate was 0.75% for ER agonists. The performance of GEMDOCK was superior to competing methods such as GOLD and DOCK. We found that our pharmacophore-based scoring function indeed was able to reduce the number of false positives; moreover, the resulting pharmacological interactions at the binding site, as well as ligand preferences, were important to the screening accuracy of our experiments. These results suggest that GEMDOCK constitutes a robust tool for virtual database screening.

Binding Sites↗
PubMed2001

Investigations of new lead structures for the design of selective estrogen receptor modulators.

Heterocyclic derivatives of (R,S)/(S,R)-1-(2-chloro-4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-(2,6-dichloro-4-hydroxyphenyl)ethylenediamine (L1) were synthesized and tested for estrogen receptor binding. The selection of the heterocycles was based on theoretical consideration. (2R,3S)/(2S,3R)-2-(2-Chloro-4-hydroxyphenyl)-3-(2,6-dichloro-4-hydroxyphenyl)piperazine 2, (4R,5S)/(4S,5R)-4-(2-chloro-4-hydroxyphenyl)-5-(2,6-dichloro-4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-imidazoline 3, and 4-(2-chloro-4-hydroxyphenyl)-5-(2,6-dichloro-4-hydroxyphenyl)imidazole 4 possess a spatial structure with neighboring aromatic rings as is realized in hormonally active [1,2-diphenylethylenediamine]platinum(II) complexes. The 1,2-diphenylethane pharmacophor, however, cannot adapt an antiperiplanar conformation to interact with the estrogen receptor (ER) comparable to synthetic (e.g., diethylstilbestrol (DES)) or steroidal (e.g., estradiol (E2)) estrogens. Due to the different spatial structures, the heterocycles cause only a marginal displacement of E2 from its binding site (relative binding affinity (RBA) < 0.1%). Nevertheless, unequivocally ER mediated gene activation was verified on the MCF-7-2a cell line. Imidazoline 3 as the most active compound reached the maximum effect of E2 (100% activation) in a concentration of 5 x 10(-7) M, while piperazine 2 and imidazole 4 activate luciferase expression only in a small but significant amount of 20% and 27%, respectively. We therefore assigned these heterocyclic compounds to a second class of hormones (type-II-estrogens), which are attached at the ER at different amino acids than DES or E2 (type-I-estrogens).

Binding, Competitive↗
PubMed2005

QSAR of estrogen receptor modulators: exploring selectivity requirements for ER(alpha) versus ER(beta) binding of tetrahydroisoquinoline derivatives using E-state and physicochemical parameters.

Considering importance of developing selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), the present paper explores selectivity requirements of tetrahydroisoquinoline derivatives for binding with ER(alpha) versus ER(beta) receptors using E-state index and physicochemical parameters. The best model [n=21, Q(2)=0.512, R(a)(2)=0.613, R=0.819, F=11.6 (df 3,17)] for ER(alpha) binding data obtained from radioligand binding assay showed importance of C(1), C(15) and lipophilicity (logP) while the best model [n=21, Q(2)=0.768, R(a)(2)=0.796, R=0.904, F=40.1 (df 2,18)] for ER(beta) binding data showed importance of C(1) and molar refractivity (MR). While modeling ER(alpha)/ER(beta) selectivity [n=21, Q(2)=0.695, R(a)(2)=0.739, R=0.882, F=19.8 (df 3,17)], C(1), C(15) and molar refractivity were found to be significant contributors. The data obtained from cellular transcription assay were also modeled. In case of ER(alpha), the best equation involving E-state values of C(1) and C(14) and logP explained 62.1% of the variance while the best equation for ER(beta) involving E-state values of C(1) and C(15) and MR explained 64.6% of the variance of the response variable. In case of ER(alpha)/ER(beta) selectivity, the best equation involving E-state values of O(8), C(14) and N(27) showed 48.3% explained variance, which increased to 63.5% on deletion of single outlier. From the analysis it appears that the nitrogen atom of the aminoethoxyphenyl substituent and 6-hydroxy substituent of the tetrahydroisoquinoline nucleus play important roles for ER(alpha)/ER(beta) selectivity in addition to R(1) and R(2) substituents.

Estrogen Receptor alpha↗
PubMed2005

High-dose estrogen and clinical selective estrogen receptor modulators induce growth arrest, p21, and p53 in primate ovarian surface epithelial cells.

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecological cancer affecting women. Hormone-based therapies are variably successful in treating ovarian cancer, but the reasoning behind these therapies is paradoxical. Clinical reagents such as tamoxifen are considered to inhibit or reverse tumor growth by competitive inhibition of the estrogen receptor (ER); however, high-dose estrogen is as clinically effective as tamoxifen, and it is unlikely that estrogen is acting by blocking ER activity; however, it may be activating a unique function of the ER that is nonmitogenic. For poorly defined reasons, 90% of ovarian cancers derive from the ovarian surface epithelium (OSE). In vivo the ER-positive OSE is exposed to high estrogen levels, reaching micromolar concentrations in dominant ovarian follicles. Using cultured rhesus OSE cells in vitro, we show that these levels of estradiol (1 mug/ml; approximately 3 mum) block the actions of serum growth factors, activate the G(1) phase retinoblastoma checkpoint, and induce p21, an inhibitor of kinases that normally inactivate the retinoblastoma checkpoint. We also show that estradiol increases p53 levels, which may contribute to p21 induction. Supporting the hypothesis that clinical selective ER modulators activate this novel ER function, we find that micromolar doses of tamoxifen and the "pure antiestrogen" ICI 182,780 elicit the same effects as estradiol. We propose that, in the context of proliferation, these data clarify some paradoxical aspects of hormone-based therapy and suggest that a fuller understanding of normal ER function is necessary to improve therapeutic strategies that target the ER.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Estradiol and a selective estrogen receptor modulator affect steroid hormone receptor messenger RNA levels and turnover in explant cultures of sheep endometrium.

Estrogens upregulate estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) gene expression in endometrium immediately before ovulation to prepare it for nurturing embryos. Most in vitro model systems have lost the ability to upregulate expression of the ER gene in response to estradiol (E2) or the ability to express the ER gene at all. Here, we used explant cultures from control and E2-treated ewes and assessed expression of four genes (ER, PR, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase [GAPDH], and cyclophilin [CYC] genes) that are upregulated by E2 in vivo on Northern blots. In cultures from control and E2-treated ewes, ER and PR messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) levels dropped significantly during 24 h of culture in the absence of E2. Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase mRNA levels increased 300% in explants from control ewes to match the higher levels in the endometrium of the E2-treated ewe (in vivo and in explant culture). The only effect of E2 in the explant cultures was to prevent the decrease in PR mRNA. The new selective ER modulator, EM-800 (EM), decreased ER and PR mRNA levels in explants from control ewes but upregulated GAPDH and CYC mRNA levels. The EM treatment in vitro mimicked that of E2 by increasing the half-life of ER mRNA in endometrial explants. These data illustrate distinct, gene-specific effects of the explant culture process, E2, and EM on the expression of endometrial genes.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Differential response of estrogen receptors alpha and beta to SP500263, a novel potent selective estrogen receptor modulator.

We determined the differential response of a novel SERM, SP500263, on estrogen receptor (ER) alpha and the more recently cloned ER-beta. Because of the high homology of amino acid residues in the ligand-binding domain of ER-alpha and ER-beta, we were not surprised to find that SP500263 binds to both ERs equally well. In contrast, SP500263 acts as a strong estrogen agonist in a strictly ER-alpha-specific manner in U2OS osteosarcoma cell lines blocking the production of interleukin (IL) 6 and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor. SP500263 also blocked IL-6 production in primary bone cells. The mechanism of this inhibition is different from the classic estrogen stimulation involving an estrogen response element (ERE). SP500263 does not activate gene expression through an ERE. In contrast to the results observed in U2OS cells, SP500263 acts as a strong estrogen antagonist in an MCF-7 breast cancer proliferation assay. Therefore, SP500263 is a member of a series of next-generation SERMs with functional selectivity toward ER-alpha and a mixed agonist/antagonist profile in a bone cell assay versus a breast cancer assay. The panel of assays described herein allow for the development of receptor-specific ligands that may be further developed into novel pharmaceuticals with an improved profile for the treatments of osteoporosis and breast cancer.

Cells, Cultured↗
PubMed2001

Centchroman, a selective estrogen receptor modulator, as a contraceptive and for the management of hormone-related clinical disorders.

DL-Centchroman (67/20; INN: Ormeloxifene) synthesized at the Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, is a nonsteroidal once-a-week oral contraceptive. It was introduced in Delhi in July, 1991, marketed in India in 1992 as Saheli and Choice-7 (Hindustan Latex Ltd., Thiruvananthapuram) and Centron (Torrent Pharmaceuticals India Ltd., Ahmedabad), and included in the National Family Welfare Programme in 1995.5 According to post-marketing surveillance, approximately 100,000 women were using this pill and approximately 1100,000 menstrual cycles were covered until 1996. It is a unique need-oriented contraceptive being effective when taken immediately after coitus or routinely as a weekly pill and has the advantage of less frequent administration. Its contraceptive action is quickly reversible. It has long terminal serum halflife of 168 hr in women and exhibits duration of anti-implantation/estrogen antagonistic action of 120 hr, despite a short (24.1 hr) serum halflife, in the rat. In lactating women, it is excreted in milk in quantities considered unlikely to cause any deleterious effect on suckling babies. In phase II and III multicentric trials as a contraceptive, children born of method-and-user failure pregnancies showed normal milestones, without any congenital anomaly. Reports of its promising action in the management of certain hormone-related clinical disorders are available. It has an excellent therapeutic index and is considered safe for chronic administration.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Interaction with anti-implantation and estrogen antagonistic activities of dl-ormeloxifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator, by tetracycline in female Sprague-Dawley rats.

Among the 10 commonly used therapeutic agents investigated, concurrent oral administration of tetracycline (140 mg/kg) twice daily on Days 1-5 post-coitum (pc) interfered with the post-coital anti-implantation activity and almost completely abolished estrogen antagonistic activity of the single anti-implantation (1.5 mg/kg, orally) dose of dl-ormeloxifene administered on Day 1 pc, resulting in the occurrence of resorbed implantations in 50% of the females. However, no such interaction was evident when tetracycline was administered intramuscularly or when ormeloxifene was administered at twice its anti-implantation dose. There was no effect of ormeloxifene and/or tetracycline treatment on serum estradiol and progesterone levels, and all animals presented apparently normal corpora lutea. Ormeloxifene administered per se inhibited aminopyrine-N-demethylase (AD), glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G-6-PDH) and glutathione-S-transferase (GST) in the liver on the day of maximal endometrial receptivity, which was prevented by tetracycline co-administration. Aniline hydroxylase and AD were not detected in small intestine or uterus in vehicle control or any of the treatment groups. There was, however, no effect of ormeloxifene plus tetracycline treatment on serum total alkaline phosphatase activity. Findings suggest that interference with anti-implantation action of ormeloxifene by tetracycline might be due primarily to the almost complete abolition of its estrogen antagonistic activity at the uterine level, effected by decreased bioavailability of ormeloxifene and/or its active metabolite(s) by altered enterohepatic recirculation because of the effect on gut microflora. This might alternatively be related to an increased rate of its metabolism and elimination from the system via prevention of ormeloxifene-induced inhibition of hepatic AD, G-6-PDH, and GST, which, by effecting a decreased rate of metabolism, might be responsible for prolonged (approximately 120 h) duration of estrogen antagonistic/anti-implantation action of ormeloxifene in this species.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Luteinizing hormone secretion elicited in a ligand-independent activation of progesterone receptor manner at pituitary level in the rat: differential effect of two selective estrogen receptor modulators.

In the absence of progesterone, RU486 reduced basal and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH)-stimulated LH secretion in pituitaries from proestrous rats, a fact which evidences a ligand-independent activation of progesterone receptors (LIAPR) at pituitary level. This was also observed in pituitaries from rats treated with tamoxifen, and absent in glands from either ovariectomized or raloxifene-treated animals. Both ovariectomy or raloxifene treatment reduced the stimulatory effect of LHRH on LH secretion, while tamoxifen induced an even higher response. Prolactin (PRL) secretion was unaffected by either RU486 or LHRH, nor it was influenced by ovariectomy or raloxifene treatment. However, treatment with tamoxifen elevated PRL in all groups. These findings indicate that LIAPR is an estrogen-dependent phenomenon at the anterior pituitary of the female rat, and that tamoxifen and raloxifene present agonist and antagonist estrogen activity, respectively, at this level.

Animals↗