PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 361 records · Page 20Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Vacuum sources in obstetrics.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the performance of vacuum equipment used in operative vaginal deliveries. STUDY METHOD: We measured wall suction in eight Cleveland area labor-and-delivery units. Additionally, we tested samples of hand-operated and electric vacuum pumps. For each apparatus we recorded vacuum in millimeters of mercury using a calibrated, diaphragm-type gauge. We calculated mean maximal vacuum. Work required to produce 500 mm Hg of vacuum was determined for the hand-operated pumps. At increments of vacuum, we compared the vacuum displayed by the gauge head included with the device to our standard. RESULTS: Mean wall suction was 494 mm Hg (range, 248-655). As compared to the Mity-vac, the CMI hand-operated pump needed significantly more work to generate 500 mm Hg of vacuum. Electric pumps produced a reliable and consistent vacuum. Gauges included with the pump had an average error of 4% over 400-600 mm Hg. CONCLUSION: Wall suction was an unreliable source of vacuum. The two hand-operated pumps tested required significantly different amounts of work to achieve an adequate vacuum. Addition of a fluid trap does not affect the vacuum, and head gauges supplied with vacuum pumps are accurate.

Delivery, Obstetric↗
PubMed1989

[The assessment of the safety of vacuum extraction deliveries under routine epidural block].

To assess the safety of vacuum extraction (V.E.) deliveries under continuous lumbar epidural block (E.B.) with Bupivacain, the modified Krebs score in CTG, Apgar score, cord arterial blood acid-base balance, hypoxanthine, CPK, CPK-BB, Neuron specific enolase and c-AMP were examined. A total of 74 full term oxytocin-induced labors were divided into three groups: A) 21 cases by V.E. under E.B., B) 34 cases under E.B. only, and C) 19 cases without V.E. or E.B. There was no difference in age, gestational weeks in the three groups. However, the incidence of primiparas was highest in group A. Though CTG showed a temporary low Krebs score in group A within 30 minutes after the initiation of E.B., it was found that there was no significant difference between the three groups 30 minutes before parturition. The apgar score, cord arterial blood pH, PO2 and B.E. were also found to be similar in all three groups. Among various kinds of substances in the cord blood, both CPK-BB and c-AMP showed a striking rise in group A, compared to groups B and C. Therefore, the use of V.E. under E.B. might be hazardous to the well-being of the newborn infant.

Accident Prevention↗
PubMed2001

Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes between vacuum extraction and forceps deliveries.

The authors conducted a population-based historical cohort study in the Canadian province of Quebec to assess the maternal and infant outcomes associated with vacuum extraction and forceps deliveries. The study database contains information on 305,391 mother-infant dyads (linked by a common institutional code and hospital chart number) for singleton live vaginal births with a nonbreech presentation at the gestational age of 37 or more completed weeks and a birth weight between 2,500 and 4,000 g during fiscal years 1991/1992 to 1995/1996. Of the births, 31,015 were delivered by vacuum extraction, and 18,727 were delivered by forceps. Compared with delivery by forceps, the adjusted risk ratios for third-/fourth-degree perineal laceration, intracranial hemorrhage, subdural or cerebral hemorrhage, intraventricular hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, cephalhematoma, and neonatal in-hospital death were 0.48 (95% confidence interval: 0.45, 0.50), 1.28 (95% confidence interval: 0.73, 2.25), 0.97 (95% confidence interval: 0.49, 1.93), 0.99 (95% confidence interval: 0.16, 5.97), 5.44 (confidence interval: 1.26, 23.43), 2.02 (95% confidence interval: 1.89, 2.16), and 0.93 (95% confidence interval: 0.32, 2.70), respectively. The authors conclude that vacuum extraction causes less maternal trauma but may increase the risk of cephalhematoma and certain types of intracranial hemorrhage (e.g., subarachnoid hemorrhage).

Adult↗
PubMed1982

Outcome of delivery subsequent to induced vacuum-aspiration abortion in parous women.

In a historical prospective study covering 1970-1978, the authors evaluated the outcome of delivery to 429 parous women subsequent to a legally induced first-trimester vacuum-aspiration abortion during 1970-1975 in Uppsala County, Sweden. This outcome was compared with the outcome of delivery to 391 randomly chosen matched parous women and that of all parous women in Sweden in 1975. Confounding variables were controlled for in multiple regression analysis using infant birth weight and gestational duration as dependent variables. In this analysis, no harmful effects of vacuum-aspiration abortion were found. Pre-term deliveries and low birth weight infants did not occur more frequently after such abortions. The study did not disclose any association between vacuum-aspiration abortion in parous women and an unfavorable outcome of subsequent delivery.

Abortion, Induced↗
PubMed2004

[Complications of vacuum extractor deliveries].

OBJECTIVES: To describe maternal and neonatal complications following deliveries assisted by vacuum extraction and to compare outcomes with those obtained after spontaneous vaginal delivery. We wanted to know if vacuum extractor was a risk factor by itself. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of two years activity involving 4524 deliveries of which 845 (18.7%) were vacuum extractor assisted. We precisely defined maternal and neonatal complications to compare their rates in spontaneous vaginal delivery and vacuum extractor groups. RESULTS: There were 1333 maternal complications and 114 neonatal complications. The adjusted risks of maternal complications were significantly higher in the vacuum extractor group for simple vaginal tears (OR=3.0; p<0.001), the simple perineal tears (OR=1.8; p<0.001) and third degree perineal tears (OR=2.7; p<0.01). For neonatal complications, the difference was significant for cephalhematomas (OR=10; p<0.001) and scalp abrasions (OR=53; p<0.001). No cases of skull fracture or subgaleal subaponeurotic hemorrhage were recorded. CONCLUSION: Our rates of maternal and neonatal complications after vacuum extractor were similar to those described in the literature. We have been able to show that vacuum extraction is itself a risk factor for third degree perineal tears and cephalhematoma. However, these complications are so infrequent that the advantages of this method of extraction argue in favor of wide use in obstetrics.

Birth Injuries↗
PubMed1997

Failed trial of vacuum or forceps--maternal and fetal outcome.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare the maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with a failed trial of instrumental delivery with that of proceeding directly to cesarean section during the second stage of labor. STUDY DESIGN: All second-stage cesarean deliveries between January 1986 and December 1992 in a tertiary care teaching hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Specific maternal and neonatal outcome parameters were studied to compare the failed instrumental group with the direct-to-cesarean section group. RESULTS: Of 29,457 live births at > 37 weeks' gestation, 401 women had a cesarean section performed in the second stage of labor. There were 326 cases in which cesarean section was performed directly during the second stage of labor and 75 women who had a failed attempt of instrumental delivery (forceps 33, vacuum 25, both 17) before cesarean delivery was done. The three instrumental groups and the direct-to-cesarean section group did not differ in any of the outcome variables for either mother or newborn. CONCLUSIONS: Failed instrumental delivery performed as a trial of forceps and/or vacuum in a setting where a cesarean section can follow promptly is not associated with increased morbidity of either mother or baby.

Cesarean Section↗
PubMed2000

Instrumental delivery of the fetal head at the time of elective repeat cesarean: a randomized pilot study.

We sought to ascertain whether the routine use of instruments, forceps or vacuum, at the time of elective repeat cesarean delivery, permits a delivery that is as safe for mother and infant and as easy for mother and physician as traditional manual delivery of the fetal head. In this prospective study 44 women undergoing elective repeat cesarean were randomized to deliver by Vacuum (V), Forceps (F), or by Manual (M) means. Groups were compared with regard to demographic variables and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Deliveries were timed from entry into the uterus until full delivery of the infant. Maternal pain scores were assessed using a 10-cm visual analog scale. There were no differences in demographic variables except that the M group had fewer women with up to two cesareans. A large percentage of women in each group were delivered with the randomized instrument. Use of the V did not demonstrate fewer extensions of the uterine incision or lesser amounts of blood loss as measured by serial hemoglobin determinations. There was a trend for the F group to require a longer period of time for delivery (p = 0.061). Women in the V group reported significantly lower pain scores (p = 0.015). There were no serious neonatal injuries. The routine use of instruments at the time of elective repeat cesarean delivery appears safe and effective.

Adult↗