PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “CEREBROSPINAL FLUID PROTEINS”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 379 records · Page 21Linked to original sources

Laboratory investigation of cerebrospinal fluid proteins.

Analysis of CSF proteins is useful in the diagnosis and management of neurological diseases in the following situations: 1. In inflammatory conditions when there is breakdown of blood-CSF barrier integrity. Meningitis is a medical emergency, with CSF total protein measurement being only a screening test. 2. In the detection of immune responses within the CNS. This is by far the most important application in a routine clinical setting, as it is now a firmly established criterion in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Oligoclonal bands restricted to the CSF are the only reliable indicators of intrathecal immunoglobulin G synthesis and are practically always associated with inflammatory disease of the CNS. The method fo choice for detecting oligoclonal bands is isoelectric focusing with immunofixation. Quantitative measurement of IgG in the CSF is of no value in diagnostic pathology. 3. In destructive brain diseases when brain-specific proteins are released into the CSF, measurement of these proteins can give prognostic information.

Cerebrospinal Fluid Proteins↗

Comparison of serum and cerebrospinal fluid protein S-100b levels after severe head injury and their prognostic importance.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) S-100b protein levels after a severe head injury. The changes in serum S-100b and CSF S-100b concentrations were investigated as indicators of brain damage for patients suffering from severe head injuries. METHODS: The sample included 48 patients with Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 8 or below who had been admitted to the authors' emergency service soon after their severe head injury occurred. Both blood and CSF samples were taken within 1 to 11 hours after admission, then 24, 48, and 72 hours after the injury. Samples of CSF were taken using a ventricular catheter. The outcome was evaluated 6 to 9 months after hospital discharge using the Glasgow Outcome Scale. RESULTS: The overall mean serum S-100b concentration was 3.5 +/- 6.4 among the patients with unfavorable outcomes and 1.3 +/- 2.5 among those with favorable outcomes. These results were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The overall mean CSF S-100b concentration was 62.2 +/- 21.8 among the patients with unfavorable outcomes and 21.8 +/- 17.7 among those with favorable outcomes. These results, however, were statistically significant (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The results show that CSF S-100b levels clearly are superior to serum S-100b levels for predicting outcome after severe head injury.

Biomarkers↗

Cerebrospinal fluid protein and opening pressure in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (pseudotumor cerebri).

We studied the relationship between the CSF protein concentration and the degree of elevation of the CSF opening pressure in 177 patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (pseudotumor cerebri). There was no linear correlation between the CSF protein and opening pressure. In addition, low CSF protein (less than 20 mg/dl) was present in only 26% of the patients. Our findings fail to confirm previous reports of an inverse relationship between the CSF opening pressure and CSF protein as well as low CSF protein in these patients.

Cerebrospinal Fluid Proteins↗