PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Colonic Polyps”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 379 records · Page 21Linked to original sources

Positional change in colon polyps at CT colonography.

PURPOSE: To determine the frequency with which polyps change positions with respect to the bowel surface and the cause of this movement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From December 2001 to March 2003, 113 patients underwent computed tomographic (CT) colonography prior to colonoscopy. For all confirmed polyps that were 5 mm and larger, images obtained with CT colonography were retrospectively analyzed by one author to determine if the polyp was present on both data sets or on only one data set. Retrospective evaluation of these polyps for ventral or dorsal location within the colonic lumen was performed for data sets obtained with patients in the prone and the supine position. The data sets were further reviewed by another author to determine the cause of positional change, when present. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients had a total of 49 histologically proved colorectal polyps that were 5 mm and larger. Eight of 49 colorectal polyps were depicted only on images obtained with the patient in the supine or prone position. Of the remaining 41 polyps that were depicted on images obtained with the patient in the supine and the prone position, 11 moved from a dorsal to a ventral location or vice versa relative to the colonic surface when the patient changed position. Five of these polyps were pedunculated on a stalk. Six were sessile; two were located in the sigmoid colon, two in the transverse colon, one in the ascending colon, and one in the cecum. In these cases, polyp mobility was related to positional changes of the colon in the mesentery, as opposed to true mobility of the polyp. CONCLUSION: In this series, 27% of polyps moved from a ventral location to a dorsal location relative to the colonic surface when the patient was turned from the supine to the prone position; thus, polyps appeared to be mobile. Thus, a mobile filling defect cannot be assumed to be residual fecal material at CT colonography.

Aged↗

Rectal cancer after sulindac therapy for a sporadic adenomatous colonic polyp.

Like adenomatous polyps in familial adenomatous polyposis, some sporadic colorectal polyps have been reported to regress in response to sulindac administration. However, a rapidly growing invasive rectal cancer developed in one of 15 patients with sulindac-treated sporadic adenomatous colorectal polyps 16 months after sulindac treatment. In this patient, both the adenomatous polyp that responded partially to sulindac and the rectal cancer developing after sulindac therapy showed immunostaining for cyclooxygenase-2. Although short term sulindac therapy seems to be able to cause some adenomatous colorectal polyps to regress, 4 months of sulindac therapy may not reliably prevent colorectal cancer development in these patients.

Adenocarcinoma↗

[Long-term follow-up of patients with diffuse colonic polyps].

During the years from 1968 to 1984, at the First Department of Surgery in Olomouc, 10 patients with diffuse polyposis of the colon were treated. In 5 of them, a familial occurrence of polyposis was dealt with. In three of them, malignity developed. In five unfamilial polyposes, malignity occurred only once. In one patient, the occurrence of malignity was found present immediately with the first manifestation of the disease. In the other patients, it was after an interval of 3 to 17 years after the onset of the disease. Three patients died from generalization of the malignant process. In two of them, carcinoma developed in the remaining part of the colon, once after previous hemicolectomy and once after colectomy. One patient with an advanced disease died one year after proctocolectomy. Two other operated on patients survive after proctocolectomy 12 and 13 years. The other patients who had been operated on before the development of malignity are healthy. The choice of an adequate radicalintervention is of importance. Optimal is the performance of colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis and the regular endoscopic and bioptic follow-up of the stump of the intestine. When proctocolectomy is necessary, it is of advantage to apply Kock's continent ileostomy.

Adult↗