[Death on the table during implantation of a hip prosthesis--a neglected peroperative risk?].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
We analyzed the cumulative revision rate in 1,474 patients (1,660 hips) operated on with a cemented Scan Hip Classic I prosthesis from November 1983 to January 1994 at Lund University Hospital. The revision rate was analyzed for 3 diagnoses--arthrosis, rheumatoid arthritis and complication after a hip fracture--and for 2 head diameters--22 and 32 mm. Until January 1996, 36 hips were revised: 31 because of aseptic loosening, 3 because of dislocation and 2 because of infection. The overall revision rate was 5.6% after 10 years and was similar in arthrosis, rheumatoid arthritis and fracture cases. Due to revisions because of dislocation in the 22 mm group, the total revision rate was lower in the 32 mm group (p = 0.03).
We have followed up for a period of seven to nine years 100 consecutive arthroplasties of the hip in which an entirely HA-coated implant had been used. The clinical results were excellent and bony incorporation was extensive in all components. No stem became loose or subsided but five cups were revised because of loosening after 3.8 to 5.5 years, having functioned painlessly and shown radiological ingrowth. Revision procedures because of excessive polyethylene wear have been performed on 18 hips and are planned for six more. Two eroded metal backings with worn-through polyethylene were exchanged; six hips showed metallosis without polyethylene wear-through. There were two cases of granulomatous cysts in the groin and 66 hips had osteolysis located periarticularly, in the greater trochanter or in the acetabulum.
Diagnosis of septic loosening of hip endoprosthesis with antigranulocyte scintigraphy (AGS) was analysed. Twenty-one hip prostheses were studied using laboratory tests and, in cases of elevated values, three-phase bone scan (BS) and AGS. Elective SPECT/CT scans were performed. Histologic and microbiologic exams verified the diagnosis. The AGS analysis revealed sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of value 1, while positive and negative predictive values were also 1. BS showed sensitivity of 1 and specificity of 0.33. In three cases, SPECT/CT scans corroborated the AGS interpretation. This diagnostic algorithm proved effective in the detection of septic loosening of hip prostheses. AGS can be avoided without risk of infection being overlooked.
We report a patient with severe intrapelvic migration of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty. Preoperative drip infusion pyelography showed a medial shift in the ureter caused by the migrated acetabular component. Preoperative angiography showed that the right external iliac artery was compressed and shifted medially by the migrated acetabular component. At revision surgery, the migrated acetabular component was successfully removed through a transabdominal (transperitoneal) approach, with the assistance of a general surgeon, and reconstruction was performed through a transtrochanteric approach. We concluded that the transabdominal approach was a useful approach for removing a severely migrated acetabular component.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Wear of polyethylene acetabular components is an important issue in total hip arthroplasty. This study was designed to evaluate differences in polyethylene wear rates between machined and direct compression molded acetabular cups. METHODS: Two hundred thirty-nine prostheses underwent radiographic evaluation using the technique of Chevrot-Kerboull. One hundred thirty-one were all-polyethylene cups machined from extruded bar stock, and one hundred eight were all-polyethylene cups direct compression molded. Both groups, all operated on in 1988, were similar in the acetabular and femoral components, were all cemented, and the acetabular components were all-polyethylene, non metal backed. The femoral components were all Charnley-Kerboull MK III type. Patient weight, average weight, the post-operative PMA score and the duration of the follow-up were similar for the two groups (mean 7.4 years). RESULTS: Results showed a mean linear wear rate of 0.06 mm per year for compression-molded polyethylene and 0.08 mm per year for machined polyethylene. Results were not significantly different. The number of acetabular radiolucencies in zone I (5.5 versus 5.3 p. 100) and the amount of lysis of the proximal part of the femur did not differ between the two groups. The number of excessive wears did not differ either. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Although polyethylene wear was lower with compression molded acetabular cups than with ram-extruded acetabular cups, results of this study suggest a non significant difference between the two types of components. A more controlled experiment would have to be performed to attribute a difference between two different types of UHMPE processing.
A previous modelization of the Total Hip Dislocation phenomenon enabled us to separate two main forms: The malposition dislocation, secondary to an error in the position of one of the prosthetic pieces, and mainly of the acetabular cup; the dislocation by muscular discoaptation, where the arthroplasty has discompensated a precarious muscular balance. The authors present a statistical validation of the model regarding 52 dislocations which occurred during the follow-up of 1196 hip arthroplasties. A "control" group was composed of 50 prostheses taken at random within the non-dislocated hips. The total rate of dislocation was 4.30 per cent. Every second one showed to be of malposition origin with a significant limitation of the theoretical intra-prosthetic amplitudes. These dislocations--all appearing early--were, for half, of the anterior type, and in that case, were mainly due to an excess of acetabular anteversion (average 35.2 degrees), the other half was of posterior type, with, in particular, a low value of acetabular anteversion (average 11.4 degrees when it was 23.4 degrees in the non-dislocated group). The other dislocations (all posterior and more delayed) corresponded to a defect of muscular coaptation in the "high-risk" patients (previously operated hip, weight loss, necrotic etiology, neuromuscular etiology, old age). Thus, in almost 90 per cent of the cases, the clinical study brought a validation of our model giving a different explanation from the too classical "cam-acting", often held responsible for the dislocation phenomena.
Results of DEXA densitometry evaluation of the proximal femur in 12 patients after cemented total hip replacement are demonstrated. Bone mineral density of the femur was measured using the dual energy absorptiometry Lunar DPX. Assessment was performed in the 3rd or 4th postoperative day, after 3rd, 5th and 12th week, after 6 and 9 months following surgery. A decrease in bone density around prosthetic stem ranging from 15% to 30% of the primary level was observed already in the third month after operation. The process continued and the values after 9 months were significantly lower then initial ones.
This work suggests a densitometric protocol for femoral studies in arthrosic patients candidate to total hip arthroplasty. The protocol was applied retrospectively to 60 cases to investigate its possible future use as a tool for the preoperative planning of prosthetic stem fixation techniques-i.e., cemented vs. uncemented. The well-known standard procedures for femoral densitometric studies by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), are usually applied to the femoral neck, Ward's triangle and the greater trochanter. Unfortunately, these analyses lose their significance if applied to arthrosic hips, and arthrosis is the main condition requiring total hip arthroplasty. Our protocol for femoral studies in arthrosic patients includes the preoperative analysis of 7 regions of interest in the proximal shaft, similar to Gruen's regions. In vivo precision tests show variation coefficients ranging 0.9-3.7%. The protocol was applied to a series of 60 arthrosic patients who were submitted to total hip arthroplasty by the same surgical staff. Twenty of them were implanted a cemented stem and the other 40 an uncemented ("press-fit") stem. Densitometric results were communicated only after surgery, to avoid any bias on the normal decision-making process usually used to choose the fixation technique for the prosthetic stem. The two groups of cemented vs. uncemented stems had different distribution of densitometric values. Therefore, the information obtained with femoral densitometric studies preoperatively can play a major role in the choice between cemented and uncemented stems. Moreover, if femoral densitometric studies are carried out preoperatively, their results can be closely related to periprosthetic tissue remodeling and implant follow-up.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
We report our results after ten year follow-up of 107 consecutive ABG-I hip prostheses implanted between June 1990 and December 1992: Only 84 prostheses were still in the study after ten years, but only six patients had undergone surgical revision. We can consider our clinical outcomes as excellent, with a whole-implant survival rate greater than 96%, a mean Merle D'Aubigne and Postel score increasing from 7.97 before operation to 16.17 at ten year follow-up, and a personal subjective assessment as excellent or good in 82.14% of patients. However, radiographic outcomes are more worrying: around 90% of patients show a stress-shielding phenomenon and granulomatous lesions in the proximal femur, and more than 82% suffer polyethylene wear greater than one millimetre (mean 1.68 mm). We think that zirconia stem heads and hooded antiluxation PE inserts are determining factors in the process of PE wear and, secondarily, in cancellous bone resorption and bone osteolysis.
PURPOSE: Aseptic loosening of prostheses implants is the most common complication of hip replacement surgery and represents an increasing problem because of still rising numbers of primary arthroplasties. This study reviews the current scientific status of causes, diagnosis and therapeutical concepts on this theme in literature. METHOD: We analyzed 6,386 cases on aseptic hip revision arthroplasties published in the international literature and separated the results for cup and femoral components. On this basis we deduced some recommendations for the operative procedure in aseptic hip revision surgery. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time of all studies was 6.8 years in the case of cemented and 4.0 years in the case of uncemented hip revision arthroplasty. As an average rate of rerevision, 15.1% was calculated for cemented cup revisions, 4.3% for uncemented cup revisions. Rates of aseptic loosening were 23.1% for cemented procedure, 8.8% for uncemented cup implants. Femoral revision implants showed an average aseptic loosening rate of 21.2% for cemented procedures and an average rate of rerevisions of 12.7%; uncemented procedures showed aseptic loosening in 4.4% of the cases and rerevision in 5.5%. For old, relatively immobile patients with reduced physical constitution, cemented reimplantation has still to be regarded as the method of choice. In young patients uncemented revision arthroplasty is to prefer both on the acetabular and the femoral side to achieve superior results with good long-term prognosis. Regarding the bony defects induced by loosening, bone grafting is recommended for cemented and uncemented reimplantation technique. CONCLUSION: In the case of aseptic hip revision arthroplasty, the therapeutical procedure has to be adapted especially to the age and general constitution of the patient as well as to the bony defects induced by prosthetic loosening. For the future, controlled studies should respect the initial condition of primary as well as revision arthroplasty in reporting the results.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The polyethylene liner has appeared to be a weak point in total hip arthroplasty. An early wear-through or a fracture of the polyethylene liner have been referred to as a catastrophic failure. The aim of the present study is to report our experience with this rare complication in ABG I hip prostheses. MATERIAL: Between September 1994 and January 2000 a total of 506 ABG I prostheses were implanted at our clinic. Due to wear-related complications, revision arthroplasty had to be performed in 90 hips in 23 male and 63 female patients by January 2002. Extensive titanium metallosis associated with polyethylene failure was found in 11 hips of 11 female patients. The remaining 56 hips of 52 female patients served as a control group. METHODS: The characteristics recorded in every patient's included age, type of patient, sex, height, weight, ESR, CRP, diagnosis, Harris hip score before revision, cup size, abduction angle of the cup, time between the primary and revision surgery and implant stability. Student's t-test, the Mann-Whitney U-test and Pearson's chi 2 test were used to evaluate the results. RESULTS: The complete failure of ABG I prostheses occurred in 2.17% of the replaced hips (11/506). A fracture or complete wear-through were the causes of failure in three (3/11, 27%) and eight (8/11, 73%) hips, respectively. The average cup size in hips without metallosis was 48.9 mm (range, 44-58; SD, 3.1) and that in hips with metallosis was 46.5 mm (range, 46-48; SD, 0.9). This difference was highly significant (t-test, p = 0.00002; U-test, p = 0.014). In the hips with metallosis, the average thickness of the polyethylene liner was 5.17 mm (range, 4.9-5.9; SD, 0.45) and the Harris hip scores before revision were significantly lower than in the hips without metallosis (59 versus 70.3 points; t-test, p = 0.023; U-test, p = 0.044). There were no other significant differences between the hips with early catastrophic failure of the polyethylene liner and those without it. DISCUSSION: Several studies have shown an indirect relationship between polyethylene thickness and its wear. Berry et al. reported catastrophic failure in hip prostheses with a polyethylene thickness of less than 5 mm; in our study, the three failed polyethylene liners were 5.9 mm in thickness. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report on a wear-through of the polyethylene liner in ABG I cups. It is suggested that a thin polyethylene liner, design characteristics and probably also poor polyethylene quality are crucial factors responsible for rapid wear in ABG I cup. The highest risk is associated with the combination of a 46 mm cup and a 28 mm head. Patients who have prostheses of this size should be checked up more frequently.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.