Mucinous carcinoid tumour of the appendix containing Paneth cells.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The occurrence of disseminated tumors of the appendix is a rare event. Usually appendix tumors are very small, located on the inside of the appendix, and can be pathologically diagnosed. Adenocarcinoid is an uncommon variant of carcinoid tumors that usually arises in the appendix. This report describes a case of a primary adenocarcinoid of the appendix in a patient who was preoperatively diagnosed to have uterus myomatosus but was intraoperatively found to instead have disseminated ovarian carcinoma. This case demonstrates that the clinical picture can be misleading, and that surgeons therefore always have to wait for the final pathological report before making a final diagnosis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
INTRODUCTION: Primary carcinoma of the appendix vermiformis/caecum is very rare. The diagnosis can often be ascertained only postoperatively by histopathological means. Preoperative diagnosis is unusual. METHOD AND RESULTS: We report on five patients with an adenocarcinoma of the appendix/base of caecom, all operated on between July 1998 and October 1999. CONCLUSION: A hemicolectomy "en principe" is not necessary. However, ileocaecal resection should have been performed during the first operation and there should be no positive lymph nodes. Postoperative diagnosis of a carcinoma after simple appendectomy necessitates Reoperation with right hemicolectomy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: To present the computed tomographic (CT) findings of synchronous mucinous tumors of the ovary and the appendix associated with pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). METHODS: Imaging studies, mainly abdominal CT scans, of three women aged 49-75 years were reviewed. Attention was directed to the ovarian masses, peritoneal seeding, and the presence of an appendiceal mucocele. RESULTS: The ovarian tumors and the appendiceal mucocele were clearly demonstrated in two cases, and they were part of the extensive PMP in the third patient. Ascites was found in all cases, with internal septation in one. Associated scalloping of the liver margins and hypodense peritoneal implants, with extensive bowel involvement, were seen in another one. Pathologically, there was one case of right ovarian mucinous cystadenoma and villous adenoma of the appendix, one case of right ovarian and appendiceal mucinous cystadenocarcinoma, and one case of bilateral metastatic ovarian implants of appendiceal mucinous cystadenocarcinoma. PMP was found in all. In the case with benign tumors of the ovary and the appendix, the PMP was classified as a benign mucinous spillage. This patient returned 33 months after surgery with PMP, in which epithelial cells were found. CONCLUSIONS: Radiologists should be familiar with the clinical occurrence of synchronous mucinous tumors of the ovary and the appendix associated with PMP and with the typical CT findings of the latter two entities. Alternatively, when the imaging findings suggest ovarian cystic tumor with PMP, the radiologist should be alerted to the probability of a clinically unsuspected appendiceal mucocele and should search for it.
We describe the imaging features in a patient with pseudomyxoma retroperitonei arising from a mucinous carcinoma of the appendix with spontaneous development of a skin fistula. The thick wall and septa characteristic of pseudomyxoma were best demonstrated on gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. This patient illustrates (a) the potential of pseudomyxoma to cause skin fistula and (b) the possibility that this intraabdominal process can first present as a dermatologic complication.
Carcinoids of the appendix are rare in children and are usually diagnosed incidentally on histologic investigation following appendectomy for appendicitis. To investigate the significance of the diagnosis of appendiceal carcinoid in children, we conducted a retrospective study of the treatment and follow-up of 36 children with histologically confirmed carcinoid tumors of the appendix. Between 1970 and 2000 a total of 36 patients (25 girls, 11 boys) were diagnosed with appendiceal carcinoid. The median age of the patients at diagnosis was 12.3 years (range 6-16 years). The indication for appendectomy was acute lower right quadrant pain in 27 cases and chronic right lower quadrant pain in 9 patients. In 27 specimens the tumor was localized at the apex, in 7 at the midportion, and in 2 at the base of the appendix. The median tumor diameter was 6 mm (range 3-17 mm). Concomitant severe appendicitis was diagnosed in 14 patients 2 with a perforated appendicitis. In only one tumor were mucin-producing cells detectable. After a median follow-up of 10 years (range 2 months to 30 years) all patients were tumor-free. None of the patients had a synchronous or metachronous noncarcinoid malignant tumor. Appendiceal carcinoids are usually asymptomatic, and the indication for surgical intervention is acute or chronic abdominal pains in the right lower quadrant. For most patients the prognosis is excellent after appendectomy. As in adults, appendectomy is the appropriate treatment.
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to clarify the role of interval appendectomy after conservative treatment of an appendiceal mass. METHODS: From January 1998 to December 2003, patients with an appendiceal mass who received conservative treatment at the Taipei Veterans General Hospital were studied retrospectively. Data on demographics, rate of appendicitis recurrence, duration of hospital stay, and complication rate were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 165 patients were included (89 males, 76 females). The mean age was 53.6 years (range 7-89 years). The rate of appendicitis recurrence after conservative treatment was 25.5%; most recurred within 6 months after discharge (83.3%). The benefit of preventing recurrence is less than 16% if interval appendectomy is performed 6 weeks after discharge and less than 10% if it is done 12 weeks later. The complication rate of appendectomy performed before or after recurrence was 10% in both groups. The duration of the second hospital stay for patients who underwent interval appendectomy before or after recurrence was 4.43 +/- 3.32 vs. 6.75 +/- 5.73 days (P = 0.023). Of the 165 patients, 17 (10.3%) had their diagnosis changed after survey or surgery, and 5 (3.03%) were found to have colon cancer upon follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who recovered from conservative treatment of an appendiceal mass should undergo colonoscopy or barium enema to detect any underlying diseases and to rule out coexistent colorectal cancer. Routine interval appendectomy benefits less than 20% of patients.
Adenocarcinoid of the appendix is an infrequent tumor with histologic features of both adenocarcinoma and carcinoid tumor. Although its malignant potential remains unclear, adenocarcinoids seem to be biologically more aggressive than conventional carcinoids. The aim of this study was to analyze long-term results of surgical treatment for appendiceal adenocarcinoid. A retrospective review (1991-2003) identified seven patients (median age 72, range 27-81 years) treated for appendiceal adenocarcinoid. The clinical data of these patients were reviewed. Follow-up was complete for all patients (median 60 months, range 24-108 months). Most cases presented with associated acute appendicitis (71%). First intention surgery consisted of appendectomy (m = 6) and right hemicolectomy (m = 1). In three patients, additional surgical procedures were performed (right colectomy). Indications for colectomy were tumor size (three cases) associated with appendectomy margin invasion in one case. One patient with lymph node and peritoneal involvement experienced recurrence 9 months after hemicolectomy and died of the disease at 2 years. One patient subsequently died of colon carcinoma 6 years after adenocarcinoid treatment. Five patients were alive without disease at the time of the last follow-up. Synchronous or metachronous colon carcinomas developed in three patients (43%). Our results suggest that appendectomy alone could be used for appendiceal adenocarcinoid provided that the tumor (1) is less than 1 cm; (2) does not extend beyond the appendix adventitia; (3) has less than 2 mitoses/10 high power fields; and (4) has surgical margins that are tumor free. Otherwise, carcinologic right colectomy seems to be indicated. The risk for developing colorectal adenocarcinoma seems to be extremely high in patients treated for appendiceal adenocarcinoid and warrants close follow-up with colonoscopic screening.
Carcinoid tumors occur most frequently in the gastrointestinal tract. Despite their ability to produce hormones, most of the midgut and hindgut carcinoids covered in this study are clinically silent, and the diagnosis is often not made before emergency surgery or evaluation for liver metastases. Because the rate of lymph node involvement and the prognosis of carcinoid tumors depend on their site and size, surgery refers to these two factors too. Lymph node metastases are most commonly found with small bowel carcinoids (20-45%), providing the rationale for an extended resection including the adjacent lymph node drainage area. Carcinoid tumors of the appendix < 1 cm in diameter rarely metastasize, simply requiring appendectomy for treatment. Lesions > 2 cm should be treated by right hemicolectomy because of their approximately 30% risk of lymph node metastases. Resection should always be done for carcinoid tumors of the colon resection as for adenocarcinomas. Rectal carcinoids < 2 cm rarely metastasize, directing the conclusion that for these smaller lesions local excision is sufficient; for lesions >2 cm a standard cancer resection should be performed provided distant metastases are absent. In general, the younger the patient or the larger the primary tumor, the more aggressive the treatment should be.
This collective review includes all available case reports of smooth muscle (stromal) tumors of the appendix and large intestine in the world literature. When compiling this review, we endeavored to examine cumulative as well as recently collected data on both benign and malignant smooth muscle tumors spanning the period 1875 to 1996. In total, there were reports of 331 leiomyomas (LMs) and 263 leiomyosarcomas (LMSs). The peak age of incidence of LM was 30 to 39 years, and the peak age of incidence of LMSs was 50 to 59 years. The female/male ratio was slightly higher for LM, and the male/female ratio was higher for LMS. The descending colon and sigmoid colon were the most common sites of both benign and malignant smooth muscle tumors. The growth of LMs most often occurred extraluminally, whereas LMSs tended to grow within the lumen of the colon. With both tumor types pain was the most frequent presenting complaint, followed less commonly by complaints of a palpable mass or gastrointestinal bleeding. LMSs tended to be larger at diagnosis than LMs, though the duration of symptoms for both types of tumor was most often reported to be between 1 month and 1 year. Finally, LMSs were found to metastasize mo
Adenocarcinoids are rare tumors with histological features of both carcinoid tumor and adenocarcinoma. They show a more aggressive biological behaviour than conventional carcinoids. We report a case of a 64-years-old female patient with a diffuse infiltration of the appendicular wall by an adenocarcinoid. Due to the positive surgical margin and the tumor expansion a hemicolectomy was performed. There are no precise criteria to direct the operative choice between appendectomy and hemicolectomy. It is thought that appendectomy is sufficient in case of small tumors in the tip of the appendix. Patients with diffuse appendicular involvement require a more aggressive surgical therapy.
We present a case of serous cystadenofibroma 2 cm in diameter in the epiploic appendix of the sigmoid as incidental finding in a 72-year-old patient who underwent hysterectomy and oophorectomy for endometrial carcinoma. The tumor showed the same histology as analogous tumors of the ovary and was associated with endosalpingiosis. Further findings were large adhesions between the epiploic appendices of the sigmoid and the parietal peritoneum and atypical cells in the peritoneal washings. Both may be explained by occult peritoneal endosalpingiosis. The histogenesis, histology, and locations of extraovarian müllerian tumors are reviewed.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
We report ten cases of carcinoid tumor of the appendix observed in children from 1988 to 1996. The patients included six females and four males with an average age of 13 years at presentation. They were admitted after complaining of pain in the lower abdominal quadrant. In eight children who presented with symptoms of acute appendicitis, the tumor was located at the tip of the appendix. Diagnosis was performed after appendicectomy (AE) and pathologic examination, which revealed a tumor slightly under 1 cm in size. Two other children were admitted with clinical signs of peritonitis due to larger tumors measuring more than 2 cm on the base of the appendix. One patient underwent a cecectomy, the other a right hemicolectomy. For all patients follow-up was 3 years, and all recovered fully. According to these findings and a review of the literature, we suggest conservative surgical procedures in children. More than 70% of these tumors are localized at the tip of the appendix and represent an incidental pathologic finding during AE; AE alone is curative. Patients with a bulky tumor of the appendicular base measuring 2 cm and invading the serosa and mesoappendix without metastases may be treated with a cecectomy; ileocecal resection may be indicated in cases where the tumor has infiltrated tissue beyond the cecum with localized metastases and in patients with incomplete gross resection. Right hemicolectomy is questionable in this age group and restricted to rare conditions.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.