PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Cancer screening”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 397 records · Page 22Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

Cost-effectiveness of an intervention to increase cancer screening in primary care settings.

BACKGROUND: The main goal was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of an intervention designed to increase cancer screening rates in primary care settings serving disadvantaged populations. The Cancer Screening Office Systems intervention reminded clinicians whether screening mammography, Pap smears, and/or fecal occult blood tests were up-to-date in eligible patients and then established a division of office responsibilities to ensure that tests were ordered and completed. METHODS: The cost-effectiveness analysis was predicated on data generated from a cluster-randomized controlled trial of Cancer Screening Office Systems conducted at eight clinics participating in a county-funded health insurance plan in Florida. Cost numerators were computed from estimated time inputs of both clinical personnel and patients valued at nationally representative wages as well as expenses for Cancer Screening Office Systems-related materials and overhead. Effectiveness denominators were constructed from net changes in screening rates observed experimentally over a 12-month follow-up. Two types of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were computed: the cost per extra screening test by type and the cost per life-year saved without and with Cancer Screening Office Systems. RESULTS: Cancer Screening Office Systems produced statistically significant increases in screening rates, and these gains more than outweighed the costs of the intervention viewed from either payer or societal perspectives. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer Screening Office Systems are a cost-effective means of addressing cancer-related health disparities.

Clinical Laboratory Techniques↗
PubMed2005

Cancer screening in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) undergo cancer screening according to established guidelines, to compare their reported screening practices with information from the general population, and to examine potential predictors of screening within our SLE sample. METHODS: We conducted a patient survey of cancer screening practices within the Montreal General Hospital lupus cohort. We compared self-reported frequency of cancer screening to guidelines suggested for the general population, and to figures for cancer screening reported in the general population. We also developed logistic regression models to establish potential predictors of screening for patients with SLE, with cervical cancer screening being the outcome of interest in our primary analyses. RESULTS: Of 48 women aged 50-69, 53% (95% confidence interval, CI: 38-68) had had a mammogram in the past 12 months, compared to 74% (95% CI: 73-75) for similarly aged Quebec women. Of 51 subjects aged 50 and older, only 18% (95% CI: 8-34) reported screening (fecal occult blood check with or without endoscopy) within the recommended time frame, compared to 48% (95% CI: 45-51) for colorectal screening for persons > 50 in the general population. Only 9 of 27 patients with SLE aged less than 30 had Pap tests in the past 12 months (33%, 95% CI: 19-52), compared with a general population rate of 56% (95% CI: 53-59) for similarly aged Quebec women. Our logistic regression model suggested that, among the SLE patients, non-whites, those with lower education, and those with higher disease damage scores were less likely to undergo cervical Pap testing. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that appropriate cancer screening may be overlooked in patients with SLE.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Impact of news of celebrity illness on breast cancer screening: Kylie Minogue's breast cancer diagnosis.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the main media narratives in the reportage of singer Kylie Minogue's illness with breast cancer; and to assess the impact of this coverage on bookings for screening for breast cancer by mammography in four Australian states. SETTING: Government sponsored BreastScreen programs in Queensland, Victoria, Tasmania and Western Australia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Narratives on breast cancer in television news programs 17-27 May 2005; initial and re-screening bookings for mammograms. PARTICIPANTS: Women aged > or = 40 years who booked for mammograms in BreastScreen programs in the 19 weeks before, the 2 weeks during, and the 6 weeks after the publicity. RESULTS: There was a 20-fold increase in news coverage of breast cancer, which emphasised that young women do get breast cancer and that early detection was critical. Overall screening bookings rose 40% in the 2 weeks of the publicity, with a 101% increase in non-screened women in the eligible age-group 40-69 years. Six weeks after the publicity, bookings remained more than a third higher in non-screened women. CONCLUSIONS: News coverage of Kylie Minogue's breast cancer diagnosis caused an unprecedented increase in bookings for mammography. Health advocates should develop anticipatory strategies for responding to news coverage of celebrity illness.

Australia↗
PubMed2006

A test of knowledge about prostate cancer screening. Online pilot evaluation among Southern California Physicians.

BACKGROUND: Although the benefits of prostate cancer screening are uncertain and guidelines recommend that physicians share the screening decision with their patients, most U.S. men over age 50 are routinely screened, often without counseling. OBJECTIVE: To develop an instrument for assessing physicians' knowledge related to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations on prostate cancer screening. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy internists, family physicians, and general practitioners in the Los Angeles area who deliver primary care to adult men. MEASUREMENTS: We assessed knowledge related to prostate cancer screening (natural history, test characteristics, treatment effects, and guideline recommendations), beliefs about the net benefits of screening, and prostate cancer screening practices for men in different age groups, using an online survey. We constructed a knowledge scale having 15 multiple-choice items. RESULTS: Participants' mean knowledge score was 7.4 (range 3 to 12) of 15 (Cronbach's alpha=0.71). Higher knowledge scores were associated with less belief in a mortality benefit from prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing (r=-.49, P<.001). Participants could be categorized as low, age-selective, and high users of routine PSA screening. High users had lower knowledge scores than age-selective or low users, and they believed much more in mortality benefits from PSA screening. CONCLUSIONS: Based on its internal consistency and its correlations with measures of physicians' net beliefs and self-reported practices, the knowledge scale developed in this study holds promise for measuring the effects of professional education on prostate cancer screening. The scale deserves further evaluation in broader populations.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

[Cost-effectiveness analysis of prostatic cancer screening].

BACKGROUND: To evaluate how much mass screening for prostatic cancer (PC) would benefit the nation economically, cost-effectiveness of PC screening was analyzed. METHODS: The cost per life-year saved (cost-effectiveness ratio; CER) was compared between PC screening and other 5 already established cancer screenings in Japan by an analytical simulation model to estimate cost and effectiveness of various screening programs, which was proposed recently by Hisamichi and Kamae. RESULTS: Although CER in PC screening amounted 204 x 10(3) yen for males aged from 55 to 59 years of age, among males more than 60 years of age. CER became negative, which meant a positive balance might be obtained economically by the adoption of screening. CER of PC screening was similar to that of colorectal cancer screening, while was 2 to 14 times lower than that of the remaining 4 established cancer screenings. According to the sensitivity analysis, the rate of the prevalence of PC, as well as the rate of the examinees for the secondary study influenced remarkedly the cost-effectiveness of PC screening. CONCLUSION: The morbidity and mortality of PC has seriously increased in the past years in Japan and the number of PC patients in 2015 is anticipated to show a 5.19-fold increase of that in 1990. According to such considerable increase of PC patients in the near future, PC screening is thought to be an economically well-balanced public activity.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Colorectal cancer screening: clinical applications.

Screening for colorectal cancer reduces mortality in individuals aged 50 years or older. A number of screening tests, including fecal occult blood tests, sigmoidoscopy, double-contrast barium enema, and colonoscopy, are recommended by professional organizations for colorectal cancer screening, yet the rates of colorectal cancer screening remain low. Questions regarding the quality of evidence for each screening test, whether screening for individuals at higher risk should be modified, the availability of the tests, and cost-effectiveness are addressed. Many potential barriers to colorectal cancer screening exist for the patient and the physician. Strategies to increase compliance for colorectal cancer screening are proposed.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

The role of cancer worry in cancer screening: a theoretical and empirical review of the literature.

This paper reviews findings regarding the influence of cancer worry on cancer screening behaviors. The role of cancer worry in motivating cancer screening has been pursued for over 30 years. Recent concerns that high levels of cancer worry may impede the screening behavior of high-risk individuals have further prioritized this area of research. Despite heavy attention in the literature, there is currently no theoretical or empirical consensus concerning whether cancer worry motivates or inhibits cancer screening behaviors. We focus the review on four questions: (1) What is cancer worry? (2) To what extent are people worried about cancer? (3) What are the predominant theoretical approaches to understanding the role of cancer worry in cancer screening behaviors? (4) What is the empirical evidence for the role of cancer worry in cancer screening behaviors? We identify factors that have hampered theoretical and empirical advancement, including divergent definitions and measurement strategies for cancer worry, low to moderate levels of cancer worry even among those at high risk, and a reliance on cross-sectional research designs. The review clarifies the current state of this literature, and proposes future research strategies, including an expanded emphasis on cancer worry and cancer screening among men and diverse racial/ethnic groups.

Anxiety↗
PubMed2003

Beliefs associated with fecal occult blood test and colonoscopy use at a worksite colon cancer screening program.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Although regular screening can decrease morbidity and mortality from CRC, screening rates nationwide are very low. This descriptive study assessed beliefs associated with fecal occult blood test and colonoscopy use among participants of a worksite colon cancer screening program. Randomly selected employees, aged 40 and older, were mailed a survey on CRC screening-related beliefs. Instruments were tested for reliability and validity. Results indicated that fecal occult blood test use was significantly associated with being female, Caucasian, having low perceived barriers, and provider recommendation. Colonoscopy use was significantly associated with higher knowledge, lower barriers, higher benefits, higher self-efficacy, and provider recommendation. Findings may be used to develop interventions designed to improve CRC screening rates.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

The impact of colorectal cancer screening on life expectancy.

METHODS: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of screening for colorectal cancer on life expectancy and estimate the number of colonoscopies needed per life year saved. The declining exponential approximation of life expectancy was used to calculate the effect of colorectal cancer screening on expected remaining lifetime. The annual number of deaths from colorectal cancer and the size of the population were obtained from the vital statistics of the United States. Published reports were consulted to determine the decrease in mortality from colorectal cancer achieved by fecal occult blood testing, screening sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy. A Markov chain analysis was used to determine the endoscopic resources required to screen and survey the entire population of U.S. residents age 50 years until death or age 85 years. RESULTS: Colorectal cancer decreases the life expectancy of U.S. residents aged 50 to 54 years by 292 days and those aged 70 to 74 years by 70 days. Screening with fecal occult blood tests extends expected lifetime of the 2 age groups by 51 and 12 days, respectively, whereas screening with sigmoidoscopy leads to increases of 86 and 21 days. Colonoscopic screening increases expected lifetime by 170 and 41 days, respectively. The number of colonoscopies needed to save 1 year of expected life ranges from 2.9 to 6.0, depending on the type of screening regimen used. CONCLUSIONS: The extension of life through screening colonoscopy is two or three times longer than the extension achieved through flexible sigmoidoscopy or fecal occult blood test, respectively. Although a large number of colonoscopies are required to screen the U.S. population, relatively few colonoscopies need to be invested per year of life expectancy saved.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Arkansas Special Populations Access Network perception versus reality--cancer screening in primary care clinics.

The origin of cancer health disparities and mortality in Arkansas is multifactorial. In response to a cooperative agreement with the National Cancer Institute's Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities, the Arkansas Special Populations Access Network (ASPAN) was developed to reduce these disparities. ASPAN's partnership with local primary care physicians of the Arkansas Medical, Dental, and Pharmaceutical Association through the Cancer Education Awareness Program is the focus of this article. A quasi-experimental intervention, the Community Cancer Education Awareness Program, was employed that included 1) physician education to increase awareness of risk factors and cancer screening; and 2) patient education to increase screening, and 3) patient-generated screening questionnaires to prompt discussion of cancer risk and screening recommendations between patients and physicians. Two urban and 2 rural clinics were targeted during a 12-month period with interval intervention assessments. Baseline review of records (n = 200) from patients >/=40 were utilized to assess the rate of breast, prostate, and colorectal screenings among clinics. For the patient education intervention, patients (n = 120) were interviewed via a 34-item assessment. Physician awareness of cancer risk factors and screening recommendations significantly increased. Statistically significant increases were seen for prostate (P = .028), breast (P = .036), and colorectal (P < .001) cancer screening across all 4 clinics. Patients' increased likelihood of cancer screenings was associated with knowledge about consumption of animal fat (P < .001), dietary fiber (P < .013), and mammograms (P < .001). Utilizing the physician as the central change agent, the ASPAN provider network successfully enhanced cancer screening awareness of minority physicians and their patients. Cancer 2006. (c) 2006 American Cancer Society.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

[Breast cancer screening and repeat screening].

PURPOSE: This study was to investigate the characteristics and related factors of breast cancer screening and repeat screening, and to propose nursing interventions to increase the rate of breast cancer screening and repeat screening. METHOD: Study subjects was 236 women residing in the community, teachers and nurses who were older than 45 were recruited. Data was collected with self administered questionnaires from July 1st to August 31st, 2003 and analysed using SPSS/WIN 10.0 with X(2)test, t-test, and stepwise multiple logistic regression at a significant level of =.05. RESULT: The breast cancer screening rate was 57.2%, and repeat screening rate was 15.3%. With the multiple logistic regression analysis, factors associated with mammography screening were age and perceived barriers of action, and factors related to the repeat mammography screening were education level and other cancer screening experience. CONCLUSION: Based on the results, we recommend the development of an intervention program to decrease the perceived barrier of action, to regard mammography as an essential test in regular check-up, and to give active advertisement and education to the public to improve the rates of breast cancer screening and repeat screening.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Comparative study of survival of screen-detected compared with symptom-detected lung cancer cases. Japanese Lung Cancer Screening Research Group.

Survival rates were studied in 1,297 screen-detected and 1297 symptom-detected patients with lung cancer. Resections took place in 20 hospitals and institutions in the Japanese Lung Cancer Screening Research Group. 60.6% of the screen-detected lung cancer patients were from stage 0 to 11 and 39.4% were from stage III and IV. On the other hand, 27.1% of symptom-detected patients were from stage 0 to 11 and 72.9% were stage III to IV. In the screen-detected group, the tumor was peripheral in 83%, adenocarcinoma in 52.4% and the resectability rate was 66.5%. Five- and 10-year survival rates were 32.4% and 22.5% respectively in the screen-detected patients and 13.7% and 9.9% in symptom-detected patients.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Long-term results from a randomized controlled trial to increase cancer screening among attendees of community health centers.

PURPOSE: We assessed whether increased cancer screening rates that were observed with Cancer Screening Office Systems (Cancer SOS) could be maintained at 24 months' follow-up, a period in which clinics were expected to be largely self-sufficient in maintaining the intervention. METHODS: Eight primary care clinics serving disadvantaged populations in Hills-borough County, Fla, agreed to take part in a cluster-randomized experimental trial. Charts of independent samples of established patients aged 50 to 75 years were abstracted, with data collected at baseline (n = 1,196) and at 24 months' follow-up (n = 1,296). Papanicolaou (Pap) smears, mammography, and fecal occult blood testing were assessed. RESULTS: At 24 months of follow-up, intervention patients had received a greater number of cancer screening tests (mean 1.17 tests vs 0.94 tests, t test = 4.42, P <.0001). In multivariate analysis that controlled for baseline screening rates, secular trends, and other patient and clinic characteristics, the intervention increased the odds of mammograms slightly (odds ratio [OR]) = 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.55; P = .03) but had no effect on fecal occult blood tests (OR = 1.17; 95% CI, 0.92-1.48; P =0.19) or Pap smears (OR = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.0.68-1.15; P = .34). CONCLUSIONS: The Cancer SOS intervention had persistent, although modest, effects on screening at 24 months' follow-up, an effect that had clearly diminished from results reported at 12 months' follow-up. Further study is needed to develop successful intervention strategies that are either self-sustaining or that are able to produce long-term changes in screening behavior.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Breast, stomach and colorectal cancer screening in Korea.

Some issues and activities in cancer screening in Korea are briefly described, in particular those in stomach, breast and colorectal screening. There is randomized trial evidence for the efficacy of screening for breast cancer and colorectal neoplasia. Stomach cancer screening is as yet unproven, but the disease is very common in Korea and one of the leading causes of death. There are major related issues to be addressed by the country in the near future. These include improving uptake and coverage rates, quality control and evaluation. Colorectal cancer will be a major concern as its incidence and mortality rates have been increasing rapidly in recent years.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Prostate cancer, screening and the generalist physician.

The generalist physician (family physician or general internist) provides primary care services and coordinates the care of other specialists for most Americans. These physicians develop continuous relationships with patients that can span decades. This therapeutic relationship is an important aspect of the services that generalist physicians provide. Generalist physicians serve as the first line of defense in screening for cancer and other serious health conditions. Prostate cancer is a prevalent and important condition. However, generalist physicians will encounter 10 times as many older men who will die of heart disease than of prostate cancer. Until more conclusive evidence is available to support the aggressive diagnosis and treatment of early stage prostate cancer, the generalist physician should refrain from screening for prostate cancer without counseling men about the risks, benefits, alternatives and uncertainties of early diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Barriers to routine gynecological cancer screening for White and African-American obese women.

BACKGROUND: Obese women are reported to be at higher risk from gynecological cancers than nonobese women, yet these women are less likely to get cancer-screening tests. The specific factors that contribute to obese women not obtaining timely cancer screening have not been identified. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the factors that contribute to lower rates of gynecological cancer screening as related to women's body size. DESIGN: A purposeful sample of 498 White and African-American women with body mass index (BMI) from 25 to 122 kg/m(2), including 60 women with BMI > 55 kg/m(2), was surveyed concerning access to gynecological cancer screening and potential barriers that could cause delay. Health care providers (N = 129) were surveyed concerning their education, practices, and attitudes about providing care and gynecological cancer-screening tests for obese women. RESULTS: Obese women reported that they delay cancer-screening tests and perceive that their weight is a barrier to obtaining appropriate health care. The percent of women reporting these statements increased significantly as the women's BMI increased. Women with BMI > 55 kg/m(2) had a significantly lower rate (68%) of Papanicolaou (Pap) tests compared to others (86%). The lower screening rate was not a result of lack of available health care since more than 90% of the women had health insurance. Women report that barriers related to their weight contribute to delay of health care. These barriers include disrespectful treatment, embarrassment at being weighed, negative attitudes of providers, unsolicited advice to lose weight, and medical equipment that was too small to be functional. The percentage of women who reported these barriers increased as the women's BMI increased. Women who delay were significantly less likely to have timely pelvic examinations, Pap tests, and mammograms than the comparison group, even though they reported that they were 'moderately' or 'very concerned' about cancer symptoms. The women who delay care were also more likely to have been on weight-loss programs five or more times. Many health care providers reported that they had little specific education concerning care of obese women, found that examining and providing care for large patients was more difficult than for other patients, and were not satisfied with the resources and referrals available to provide care for them. CONCLUSION: Since the goal of preventive cancer screening is to improve health outcomes for all women and since obese women are at greater risk, strategies must be designed to reduce the weight barriers to these tests and improve the quality of the health care experience. Providers should receive specific training related to care of large women.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Quality of life and trial adherence among participants in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial.

BACKGROUND: The National Cancer Institute's Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial was designed to examine whether annual screening tests for these four tumor sites result in reduced disease-related mortality. We assessed the impact of trial participation on both health-related quality of life (HRQL) and trial adherence. METHODS: Participants (N = 432; 217 in the control arm and 215 in screening arm) were accrued from the Georgetown University PLCO site from May through December 1998. Screening-arm participants were interviewed by telephone at baseline (prescreening), shortly after notification of screening results (short-term follow-up), and 9 months after notification of screening results (intermediate-term follow up). Control-arm participants completed a baseline and 1-year follow-up assessment. Logistic regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Participants reported high levels of HRQL and satisfaction with their decision to participate. Screening-arm participants with abnormal screening results had a higher level of intrusive thoughts about cancer than those with all normal results (odds ratio [OR] = 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3 to 6.3) at the short-term follow-up but not at the intermediate-term follow-up (when abnormal test results were known to be false positive; OR = 1.9, 95% CI = 0.89 to 4.2). Trial adherence was statistically significantly better among participants who had received all normal results in the previous year's screening tests (93.7% versus 78.7%; OR = 3.7, CI = 1.1 to 12.0) than in those who received at least one abnormal result. In the control arm, adherence (defined as returning annual questionnaires) was positively associated with education (OR = 3.4, 95% CI = 1.4 to 8.4) and sex, with women being more likely to return questionnaires than men (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.05 to 4.4). CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to collect HRQL measures as part of a large cancer screening trial. Prior abnormal screening results were related to short-term HRQL but not to intermediate-term HRQL. Trial adherence was poorer among those who had received previous false-positive results. These results suggest several methods for improving adherence in this and other subgroups.

Adult↗