PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Program Evaluation”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 397 records · Page 22Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Missouri's Take a Seat, Please! and program evaluation.

In Missouri, injuries from motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death to children aged one to four. In 1984, the state legislature enacted child passenger safety legislation, but by 1992, compliance with the law was still disappointingly low. The Missouri Department of Health implemented a program called Take a Seat, Please! in which concerned citizens reported motorists who transported children under age four in a way not compliant with the state law. Two years later, a telephone survey and a pre- and postobservation study at child care centers did not show that the intervention had any effect. The program was discontinued in September 1995.

Accident Prevention↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Program evaluation of a sex education curriculum for women with mental retardation.

The effectiveness of a sexual education and health promotion program for 252 women with mental retardation was analyzed using an evaluation model. We used confirmatory factor analysis (LISREL) to explain the pathways of learning and related the number of instructional contacts with the outcomes. Three factors (hygiene, social interaction, and sexual experience) affected sexual knowledge directly. An increase in sexual knowledge was directly associated with a greater number of instructional contacts. The analysis indicates that our program is effective and adds to our understanding of factors contributing to sexual knowledge for adults with mental retardation.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Eat smart! Workplace Cafeteria Program evaluation of the nutrition component.

PURPOSE: The nutrition component of the Eat Smart! Workplace Cafeteria Program (ESWCP) in a hospital was evaluated. We assessed staff's frequency of visits to and purchases in the hospital cafeteria, attitudes about the program, short-term eating behaviour change, and suggestions to improve the ESWCP. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to hospital staff members who were not on leave (n=504). Dillman's Tailored Design Method was used to design and implement the survey. Four mail-outs were used and yielded a 51% response rate. RESULTS: Eighty-seven percent of respondents visited the hospital cafeteria at least once a week in an average seven-day week, and 69% purchased one to five meals or snacks there each week. Eighty-six percent of respondents said that they were aware of the hospital's program. Notices on cafeteria tables were the primary method of learning about the program (67%). Reported program benefits included increased knowledge about healthy eating, convenience of having healthy foods in the cafeteria, and increased energy. CONCLUSION: Many respondents were aware of the program, provided positive comments about it, and reported positive changes in eating habits. However, future observational research is warranted to note foods served and sold before and after program implementation, as well as to examine whether results can be generalized to other settings.

Canada↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Telephone follow-up program evaluation: application of Orem's self-care model.

The traditional model of nursing, in which patients are discharged with a follow-up medical appointment, is no longer sufficient in the current healthcare environment. Primary nurses working in a 58-bed rehabilitation unit located in a 1,700-bed tertiary care medical center implemented a follow-up telephone call program to support the patient's transition from acute rehabilitation nursing care to community living. Patients discharged to home within a five-state area were called 2 weeks and 6 weeks after discharge. Notes on the telephone conversations were entered on a data collection form and later analyzed using Orem's self-care deficit theory (Orem, 1991). A total of 144 follow-up calls were made. During the first call (n = 105), 157 problems (1.5 per call) were noted, whereas 79 (2.0 per call) were identified during the second call (n = 39). Medication, safety, and bladder problems were most often cited as concerns by patients and caregivers after discharge. The most frequently used helping interventions during both the first and the second telephone calls were guiding and supporting.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

The British Columbia Mammography Screening Program: evaluation of the first 15 months.

We report our experiences in the first 15 months of a government-funded pilot project begun in 1988 to study the feasibility of rapid throughput, low-cost screening mammography in British Columbia. The primary goals of the project were (1) to determine the unit cost of screening mammography within the context of the program; (2) to design and put into operation a centralized system of data collection, analysis, and quality control to enable calculations of cancer detection rates, biopsy rates, biopsy yield ratios, staging, and other specific cancer characteristics; and (3) to study compliance in the community where the program was offered. A total of 11,824 women had mammography at a unit cost of U.S. $32.66. Computerized analysis revealed that (1) 11% of women had known primary risk factors; (2) findings on mammograms were interpreted as abnormal in 9% of screening examinations; (3) breast cancers were confirmed in 47 (22%) of 211 patients who had biopsies, and 87% of these were stage 0-1. The overall cancer detection rate was four per 1000, with five per 1000 for women who had not had mammography in the preceding 2 years and one per 1000 for women who had had mammography in the past 2 years. The results show that screening mammography can be conducted at low cost. Data collection and analysis and compliance were sufficiently convincing to initiate province-wide expansion.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

The how and why of the ADA's evaluation program for dental therapeutic products.

Since 1930, the Council on Dental Therapeutics of the American Dental Association has been evaluating dental drug products for safety and efficacy through its Acceptance Program. To date, numerous products have been evaluated, and many hundreds have received the council's seal of acceptance. Acceptance criteria are rigorous, and the council relies on expert consultants to evaluate the supporting data. There are no manufacturer fees involved with the Acceptance Program. When a product has been awarded the seal, it means that adequate data have been submitted, and that the product is safe and does what it says it will do. This paper describes, in detail, how the Acceptance Program works.

American Dental Association↗
PubMed2005

Effectiveness of computer ergonomics interventions for an engineering company: a program evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: Ergonomic principles at the computer workstation may reduce the occurrence of work related injuries commonly associated with intensive computer use. A program implemented in 2001 by an occupational therapist and a physical therapist utilized these preventative measures with education about ergonomics, individualized evaluations of computer workstations, and recommendations for ergonomic and environmental changes. METHOD: This study examined program outcomes and perceived effectiveness based on review of documents, interviews, and surveys of the employees and the plant manager. RESULTS: The program was deemed successful as shown by 59% of all therapist recommendations and 74% of ergonomic recommendations being implemented by the company, with an 85% satisfaction rate for the ergonomic interventions and an overall employee satisfaction rate of 70%. Eighty-one percent of the physical problems reported by employees were resolved to their satisfaction one year later. CONCLUSION: Successful implementation of ergonomics programs depend upon effective communication and education of the consumers, and the support, cooperation and collaboration of management and employees.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

[Social context of health promotion program evaluation].

The concept and methodology of health promotion programmes evaluation have much in common with the evaluation of all social programmes. Its goal is to improve the decision-making and to engage the community in this process. In this way, health promotion programmes gain procedures which analyse their effectiveness and acquire social validity. The role of evaluation studies is linked with the right to possess information about factors determining community participation in the managerial process. Designing and implementing evaluation research is in contradiction with the technocratic approach to problem solving and to planning and implementing programmes, which will improve community health.

Community Health Planning↗