PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Prone Position”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 397 records · Page 22Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

[The influence of the supine and prone positions in the esophageal pH monitoring in very low birth weight infants].

BACKGROUND: Scarce information is available on the effects of body's positioning in the number and the duration of gastroesophageal reflux episodes in very low birth weight infants. AIM: To evaluate the influence of prone compared to supine positions on the frequency and duration of acid gastroesophageal reflux episodes in very low birth weight infants and study the role of body position in the occurrence of exams with reflux index > or = 5% and > or = 10%. METHODS: Sixty one prolonged esophageal pH monitoring exams were retrospectively analyzed. The difference between the prone and supine position exam duration was not longer than 3 hours. The reflux index was evaluated for the total period of the exam (reflux index total) and for each period in the two positions. The total number of reflux episodes, the number of reflux episodes > 5 minutes and the longest reflux episode were evaluated for each period in the two positions. These parameters were compared in accordance with body positioning, for each one of the three reflux index total categories: reflux index total < 5%, > or = 5% and > or = 10%. The frequencies of exams with reflux index total > or = 5% and reflux index total > or = 10% were compared for both positions. RESULTS: The number of hours in prone (11.2 +/- 1.0) and in supine (11.2 +/- 1.1) position were not different. All the prone positions monitoring parameters were significantly lower than the supine ones, in the three reflux index total categories. In the supine position, 32.7% (20/61) and 27.8% (17/61) of the exams, which were normal in prone, became abnormal, taking into account reflux index > or = 5% and > or = 10%, respectively, obtained for each position. CONCLUSIONS: In prone position, there is a significant decrease in number and duration of acid reflux episodes in very low birth weight infants. Supine position promotes a significant increase in the number of esophageal pH monitoring exams with reflux index > or = 5% and > or = 10%, making easier the diagnose of the gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Esophagus↗
PubMed1997

Influence of prone position on the extent and distribution of lung injury in a high tidal volume oleic acid model of acute respiratory distress syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of body position on the extent and distribution of experimental lung damage in an oleic acid canine model of acute respiratory distress syndrome, using mechanical ventilation with high tidal volumes and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study. SETTING: Experimental animal laboratory. SUBJECTS: Twelve anesthetized and paralyzed dogs. INTERVENTIONS: Ninety minutes after lung injury was induced by injection of oleic acid, 12 animals were randomized to be ventilated for 4 hrs, in either the supine (supine group, n = 6) or prone (prone group, n = 6) positions, using the same ventilatory pattern (F10(2) 0.6, PEEP > or = 10 cm H2O, and a tidal volume that generated a peak transpulmonary pressure of 35 cm H2O when implemented in the supine position). Regardless of randomization to position, the tidal volumes, F10(2), and PEEP were kept constant and the pulmonary artery occlusion pressure was maintained between 4 and 6 mm Hg for the duration of the study. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: At the end of the protocol, the lungs were excised for gravimetric determination (wet/dry weight ratio) and histologic examination (histologic score). Changes over time in the static pressure-volume curve of the lungs (obtained in the supine position) were also used as end-point variables. At baseline, hemodynamic and respiratory variables did not differ between groups. Just before randomization to position (90 mins after oleic acid injection), both groups presented similar lung static pressure-volume curves. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (4.3 +/- 1.9 vs. 4.8 +/- 1.3 mm Hg [supine vs. prone group]), cardiac output (4.1 +/- 0.4 vs. 5.2 +/- 1.3 L/min [supine vs. prone group]), and venous admixture (36.7 +/- 20.7% vs. 28.3 +/- 19.4% [supine vs. prone group]) were also not significantly (p > .05) different when measured in the supine position. At the end of the experiment, lung gravimetric data in the two experimental groups were not statistically different, suggesting a similar extent of edema. Histologic abnormalities, however, were less in the prone group than in the supine group (p < .01), due primarily to marked differences in extent and severity in the dependent regions of the lungs. Static lung compliance improved over time in the prone group (34 +/- 9 to 46 +/- 19 mL/cm H2O)(p = .02), but not in the supine group (34 +/- 6 to 36 +/- 6 mL/cm H2O). CONCLUSIONS: After oleic acid-induced lung injury, animals ventilated with high tidal volume and PEEP undergo less extensive histologic change in the prone position than in the supine position. The prone position alters the distribution of histologic abnormalities.

Animals↗
PubMed1987

[Prone position and unexpected sudden infant death].

The authors have discovered that in all the epidemiological surveys, 80 to 90% of SIDS happen when the infant is lying prone and at the age of 2 or 3 months when the infant is able to turn his head. Comparing the position of infants who died of SIDS with that generally pertaining to infants in the region, they found a good correlation between SIDS and the prone position. It seems that SIDS is a multifactorial syndrome in which asphyxia has been abandoned too readily in favour of other causes which have not been proven. They would like similar surveys to be carried out. Pending the results of these studies and taking into account the other disadvantages of the prone position, they recommend a return to laying the baby on his side in a traditional fashion.

Asphyxia↗