SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “ABDOMINAL WALL”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 415 records · Page 23Linked to original sources

PubMed2005

Use of abdominal wall with mesothelium as a substrate for reconstitution of urinary bladder wall: replacement of the mesothelium by the urothelium and complete bladder wall reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: The urinary bladder has considerable regenerative ability and may enable reconstitution of the urinary bladder if used appropriately. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Rat urinary bladders were allotransplanted onto the inner surface of the abdominal wall with the urothelium facing the mesothelial cells. The ureters, urethra and blood supply were left intact. RESULTS: A week after the operation, the mesothelium of the abdominal wall was replaced by the urothelium from the donor urinary bladder and a cyst was formed, the inner surfaces of which were completely covered with the urothelium. After a few months, the submucosal tissue and muscular layer had also moved to cover the wall, forming an almost complete urinary bladder. The mucosal membrane formed complex folds, which was probably due to overgrowth of the epithelial cells and the submucosal connective tissues. The area derived from the abdominal wall showed only minimal shrinkage, whereas the abdominal wall from which the mesothelium had been removed showed significant shrinkage. CONCLUSION: This method is potentially useful for the reconstruction of urinary bladders.

Abdominal Wall↗

PubMed2001

Gallstone in abdominal wall--a complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

A 39-year-old woman presented with abdominal wall mass 9 years after she underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstones. After surgical resection, a pathologic examination identified an abscess cavity within the abdominal wall that was surrounded by a wide, diffuse, poorly defined wall of dense fibrous tissue. An examination did not show neoplastic tissue. The cavity was bile-stained and contained a 2.5-cm gallstone. This case shows a complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gallstones spilled during the extraction of the gallbladder through the abdominal wall incision may lead to a reactive process that clinically and microscopically may resemble a fibro-proliferative disorder, including a neoplastic process. This complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy is rare. Pathologists must be aware of its occurrence because examination of the solid fibrous wall may lead to diagnoses of reactive or neoplastic fibro-proliferative processes.

Abdominal Muscles↗

PubMed2003

Risks associated with "components separation" for closure of complex abdominal wall defects.

The reconstruction of complex abdominal wall defects can often pose a significant challenge to surgeons and their patients. Complex ventral hernias may result from large tumor resections, trauma from gunshot wounds, or infections following routine abdominal surgery. "Components separation" of the abdominal musculature uses advancement of local autologous tissue, when available, to close large ventral wall defects. The authors report on a retrospective chart review of 30 patients who underwent components separation for the closure of complex abdominal defects. The study group was 50 percent female, with a mean age of 45 years, body mass index of 33.2 kg/m2, and abdominal defect size of 240 cm2. On average, 20 percent of patients had preoperative wound infections, 30 percent had intraoperative bowel enterotomies, and 33 percent required prosthetic mesh for closure. Total surgery time averaged 4.8 hours, with a mean postoperative stay of 12.5 days and follow-up of 9.5 months. The recurrence rate was 10 percent; postoperative complications included midline ischemia, infection, and dehiscence occurring at rates of 20, 40, and 43 percent, respectively. This study provides a comprehensive review of the risks and complications associated with the treatment of complex ventral hernias and those associated with abdominal "components separation."

Abdominal Wall↗

PubMed1981

Management of acute full-thickness losses of the abdominal wall.

Over a 20-year interval, 167 patients sustained acute full-thickness abdominal wall loss due to necrotizing infection (124 patients), destructive trauma (32 patients), or en bloc tumor excision (11 patients). Polymicrobial infection or contamination was present in all but five of the patients. Of 13 patients managed by debridement and primary closure under tension, abdominal wall dehiscence occurred in each. Only two patients survived, the 11 deaths being caused by wound sepsis, evisceration, and/or bowel fistula. Debridement and gauze packing of a small defect was used in 15 patients; the single death resulted from recurrence of infectious gangrene. Pedicled flap closure, with or without a fascial prosthesis beneath, led to survival in nine of the 12 patients so-treated; yet flap necrosis from infection was a significant complication in seven patients who survived. The majority of patients (124) were managed by debridements, insertions of a fascial prostheses (prolene in 101 patients, marlex in 23 patients), and alternate day dressing changes, until the wound could be closed by skin grafts placed directly on granulations over the mesh or the bowel itself after the mesh had been removed. Sepsis and/or intestinal fistulas accounted for 25 of the 27 deaths. Major principles to evolve from this experience were: 1) insertion of a synthetic prosthesis to bridge any sizeable defect in abdominal wall rather than closure under tension or via a primarily mobilized flap; 2) use of end bowel stomas rather than exteriorized loops or primary anastomoses in the face of active infection, significant contamination, and/or massive contusion; and 3) delay in final reconstruction until all intestinal vents and fistulas have been closed by prior operation.

Abdominal Muscles↗

PubMed1998

The effect of abdominal wall morphology on ultrasonic pulse distortion. Part II. Simulations.

Wavefront propagation through the abdominal wall was simulated using a finite-difference time-domain implementation of the linearized wave propagation equations for a lossless, inhomogeneous, two-dimensional fluid as well as a simplified straight-ray model for a two-dimensional absorbing medium. Scanned images of six human abdominal wall cross sections provided the data for the propagation media in the simulations. The images were mapped into regions of fat, muscle, and connective tissue, each of which was assigned uniform sound speed, density, and absorption values. Propagation was simulated through each whole specimen as well as through each fat layer and muscle layer individually. Wavefronts computed by the finite-difference method contained arrival time, energy level, and wave shape distortion similar to that in measurements. Straight-ray simulations produced arrival time fluctuations similar to measurements but produced much smaller energy level fluctuations. These simulations confirm that both fat and muscle produce significant wavefront distortion and that distortion produced by fat sections differs from that produced by muscle sections. Spatial correlation of distortion with tissue composition suggests that most major arrival time fluctuations are caused by propagation through large-scale inhomogeneities such as fatty regions within muscle layers, while most amplitude and waveform variations are the result of scattering from smaller inhomogeneities such as septa within the subcutaneous fat. Additional finite-difference simulations performed using uniform-layer models of the abdominal wall indicate that wavefront distortion is primarily caused by tissue structures and inhomogeneities rather than by refraction at layer interfaces or by variations in layer thicknesses.

Abdominal Muscles↗

PubMed2005

Surgeon perspectives on options for ventral abdominal wall hernia repair: results of a postal questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: Ventral abdominal wall hernias are a common cause of morbidity and mortality. Opinion varies as to appropriate management. A recent consensus meeting on incisional hernia identified the need to standardise repair. On this background, a survey of current practice was performed. METHOD: A questionnaire was sent to 101 practicing general surgeons within the West of Scotland. Incisional, epigastric and para-umbilical defects were subdivided into defect size <2, 2-5 and >5 cm. The surgeons were asked to indicate the most appropriate repair (suture, mayo or mesh) for each. The influence of reducibility on the decision to repair was also assessed. RESULTS: Sixty-one of 101 questionnaires were returned valid giving a response rate of 60%. Suture repair was significantly more likely to be used in all defects <2 cm (P<0.001). Mesh repair was significantly more likely to be recommended in all defects >5 cm (P<0.001). Of defects >5-cm, mesh was recommended for 90% of incisional hernia compared with 81% of epigastric and 76% of para-umbilical hernia (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in choice of repair for defect size 2-5 cm with opinion divided between suture and mesh. Irreducibility increased the likelihood of recommendation for repair. CONCLUSION: This survey shows a lack of consensus on the appropriate repair of ventral abdominal wall hernia among practicing consultant general surgeons. This reflects the contrasting views within the current literature.

Abdominal Wall↗

PubMed1996

Experimental assay of a Dual Mesh polytetrafluoroethylene prosthesis (non-porous on one side) in the repair of abdominal wall defects.

The porosity of the prosthetic biomaterials used to repair defects in the abdominal wall seems to influence the tissue repair process insofar as tissue integration of the prosthetic material and the formation of adhesions with abdominal viscera are concerned. We studied the behaviour of a new type of polytetrafluoroethylene prosthesis used for the repair of abdominal wall defects. Dual Mesh (DM), which has two different faces; one face has a porosity between 30 and 60 microns, while the other is non-porous. In 20 New Zealand White rabbits, a full-thickness (except skin) 7 cm x 5 cm defect was created in the anterior abdominal wall that was repaired with DM. At 14, 30, 60 and 90 days, samples were obtained and studied by light and scanning electron microscopy. An immunohistochemical study was made with antibody anti-rabbit macrophages (RAM-11). Tensile strength was measured with an Instron tensiometer using 2-cm-wide strips obtained parallel to the shorter axis of the implant. DM induced little tissue adhesion to the material on the visceral peritoneum interface and was surrounded by organized repair tissue. The biomaterial was integrated in the repair tissue on the subcutaneous interface, but not on the peritoneal interface. The macrophage response decreased between days 14 and 90 (P < 0.001). Tensile strength increased significantly (P < 0.05) at every study period. We conclude that the DM prosthesis has little tendency to formation of visceral adhesions, the DM prosthesis was well tolerated by the receptor organism and the tensile strength of the prosthesis/receptor tissue interface increased with time.

Abdominal Muscles↗

PubMed1999

[Anatomy of the abdominal wall].

The anatomy of the abdominal wall describes the superficial and extra peritoneal planes: skin, fat and muscles. Inguinal and lumbar anatomy are excluded. Phylogenetic, embryologic and comparative anatomy allow better integration of evolution, growth, and congenital syndromes. Classical anatomy is adapted to modern aspects, more useful for plastic surgeons.

Abdominal Muscles↗

PubMed1992

The Monfort operation for abdominal wall reconstruction in the prune belly syndrome.

We present our results in correcting the abdominal wall defect in 8 patients with the prune belly syndrome using the Monfort operation. Mean patient age at operation was 10 years. Four patients also underwent significant concomitant operative procedures. There were no early postoperative complications, and the mean postoperative stay for those 4 children undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction alone was 7.7 days. This operation preserves the umbilicus, and strengthens, flattens and thickens the abdominal wall. It produces a narrow-waisted more normal physique and provides excellent transperitoneal exposure for concomitant genitourinary reconstructive procedures.

Abdominal Muscles↗

PubMed2006

Artificial midline-fascia of the human abdominal wall for testing suture strength.

To reduce testing of human abdominal wall closure-modalities in test animals, a fibre reinforced rubber with identical mechanical properties compared to the human midline fascia (linea alba: LA) was developed. The microscopic structure of the human LA, stress-strain behaviour, maximum tensile force and macroscopic failure mechanism in tensile tests with human LA were defined as indicators for the required properties of the fibre reinforced rubber. A composite consisting of latex rubber and cotton fibres was developed that shows mechanical properties comparable to the human abdominal wall. The results of the tensile tests on sutured artificial LA were highly similar to those performed on sutured human LA. The material presented in this study is proposed as a substitute for human and animal tissues presently used to test suture techniques. A protocol for an approach to develop artificial fibrous soft tissue like fascie and tendon was drawn up.

Abdominal Muscles↗

PubMed1999

Hyaluronate, tetrachlorodecaoxide, and galactolipid prevent adhesions after implantation of Gore-Tex and dura mater into the abdominal wall in rats.

Gore-Tex (GT) and dura mater (DM) are used as prosthetic materials for the closure of the abdominal wall defects, however, they create intra-abdominal adhesions. This study addresses the question of which substances can reduce these adhesions. In rats, Gore-Tex and DM were placed on the inner abdominal wall. Two weeks later the animals were killed; the anterior abdominal wall was excised and photographed. The photographs were digitized and the surface area covered by adhesion was measured by computer analysis. In animals where DM or GT was implanted without the addition of an anti-adhesive substance, 45% of the DM and 34% of the GT surface was covered by adhesions. When hyaluronate (HA), tetrachlorodecaoxide, or galactolipid was applied to the bowel intra-operatively, adhesions were found on only 14%, 11% or 8% of the GT surface. For DM, only HA was effective, and reduced adhesions to 9% and 10%, respectively. Plasmin, taurolidine, and streptokinase-streptodomase were ineffective in preventing adhesions in both DM and GT.

Abdominal Muscles↗

PubMed2001

Abdominal wall sinus due to impacting gallstone during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an unusual complication.

During laparoscopic cholecystectomy, perforation of the gallbladder can occurs in < or = 20% of cases, while gallstone spillage occurs in < or = 6% of cases. In most cases, there are no consequences. Gallstones can be lost in the abdominal wall as well as the abdomen during extraction of the gallbladder. The fate of such lost gallstones, which can lead to the formation of an abscess, an abdominal wall mass, or a persistent sinus, has not been studied adequately. Herein we report the case of a persistent sinus of the abdominal wall after an emergent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an 82-year-old woman with gangrenous cholecystitis and perforation of the friable wall in association with an empyema of the gallbladder. The culture of the obtained pus was positive for Escherichia coli. After a small leak of dirty fluid from the wound of the epigastric port site of 4 months' duration, surgical exploration under local anesthesia revealed that the sinus was caused by spilled gallstones impacting into the abdominal wall between the posterior sheath and left rectus abdominalis muscle. The removal of the stones resulted in complete healing. Long-term complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy involving the abdominal wall are rare but important possible consequences that could be avoided.

Abdominal Abscess↗

PubMed1999

Regeneration of abdominal wall aponeurosis: new dimension in Marlex peritoneal sandwich repair of incisional hernia.

Loss of abdominal wall substance is a major cause of incisional hernia formation. It makes repair of this iatrogenic human ailment a difficult surgical problem. The abdominal wall substance loss has compelled the world's surgical community dealing with this condition to substantiate the repair with extra material such as skin, fascia, wire mesh, and lately biocompatible synthetic mesh. Even though the synthetic mesh is compatible and well tolerated by body tissues, it is not without complications. Regenerative repair in the region of the abdominal wall with substance loss is probably the best repair if it can be achieved. With reasonable success in animal experiments and the positive regenerative capacity of stem cells to transform the peritoneum into an aponeurotic layer, the new technique using a Marlex peritoneal sandwich for repair of large incisional hernias was attempted but was not reported in the article published in the World Journal of Surgery in 1991. The present study is based on experiments on seven mongrel dogs. A suitable embryonal segment of autogenous peritoneum was excised and transferred to the rectus sheath region. The gross appearance of the grafted membrane 3 months after operation revealed tough, thick tissue formation. The histology confirmed the presence of collagen fiber tissue in layers similar to the aponeurosis in the grafted peritoneal membrane. The use of this regeneration in the Marlex peritoneal sandwich technique of repair of large incisional hernias and the scientific rationale of tissue regeneration by desired metaplasia is discussed.

Abdominal Muscles↗

PubMed2001

C-reactive protein (CRP) as a response to postoperative stress in laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the abdominal wall lift, with performed pneumoperitoneum (CO2), and in open cholecystectomy.

The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed thirteen years ago and rapidly became the preferred way of operation in patients suffering from cholelithiasis. The pneumoperitoneum can be responsible for haemodynamic disorders. The abdominal wall lift is an alternative way for pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The aim of this study was the comparative analysis of operative trauma response in the patients treated by laparoscopic cholecystectomy using abdominal wall lift and in cases which underwent open cholecystectomy or laparoscopic operation using pneumoperitoneum. The concentration of C-reactive protein was measured in patient serum before and twice after surgery. The obtained data underwent a statistic analysis. In all cases the surgery caused the marked changes of CRP-concentration. The mean level of CRP was higher three times in patients after open cholecystectomy than in cases treated by laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the use of abdominal wall lift or with performed pneumoperitoneum. During the experiment the statistically significant different between laparoscopic surgery with the use of the laparolift and laparoscopic with earlier performed pneumoperitoneum was observed. The stress and inflammatory response in cholecystectomy using abdominal wall lift was significant but smaller than the response noted in open cholecystectomy and similar to the response observed after pneumoperitoneum. The replacement of pneumoperitoneum by abdominal wall lift does not change the operative stress in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Abdominal wall metastasis following treatment of rectal cancer.

We present a 60-year-old man with a metastatic subcutaneous lump in the left lower quadrant of the abdomen, from rectal cancer, which was treated three years earlier with low anterior resection of the rectum. Excision of the abdominal wall metastasis was accomplished with negative histological margins, but six months later a new abdominal wall mass was detected. The patient underwent surgery again, in which the abdominal wall metastasis was resected en bloc with adherent portion of small bowel, along with inguinal lymph node dissection. The patient's condition deteriorated 10 months after the initial diagnosis, presenting again with abdominal wall cancer and dying from disseminated peritoneal disease.

Abdominal Wall↗

PubMed1980

[Experimental-morphological reasons for using dura mater for plastic surgery of defects of the anterior abdominal wall].

A possibility to use preserved dura mater (in 2% formalin) for substituting various abdominal wall layers under both sterile and infectious conditions has been studied experimentally in 126 dogs. Morphological investigation has been performed at various postoperative time (1 day--2 years). It has been stated that the dura mater implantation produces minimal aseptic inflammatory reaction in the abdominal wall tissues. The transplant is gradually disorganized and resolved and simultaneously substituted with the connective tissue. There are no commissurae between the transplant and the abdominal organs. The dura mater is resistive to infections. Application of the dura mater for surgery of hernia of the abdominal wall is substantiated.

Abdominal Muscles↗

PubMed1994

Risk of Anterior Abdominal Wall Adhesions Increases with Number and Type of Previous Laparotomy

Adhesions to the anterior abdominal wall after previous midline vertical laparotomy were found in 68% of patients undergoing laparoscopy (Childers et al: Gynecol Oncol 50:221, 1993). We reviewed the prevalence of anterior wall adhesions in patients with previous laparotomy incisions who underwent laparoscopy (>95% of patients) or laparotomy. The prevalence of omental and/or bowel adhesions to the anterior abdominal wall in proximity to the umbilicus were tallied and analyzed by incision site (midline vertical or suprapubic transverse) and number of previous laparotomies (one or more than one). The following table illustrates the number of patients in each category with anterior abdominal wall adhesions. While the prevalence of adhesions is increased with more than one previous laparotomy this did not reach statistical significance (Chi-square test). A midline vertical laparotomy does significantly increase the risk for anterior wall adhesions compared to a transverse incision (p<0.05). However, it should be noted that 28% of patients with a previous suprapubic transverse incision (Pfannenstiel or Maylard) had omental and/or bowel adhesions. In this series, one patient with two previous transverse incisions had an incidental enterotomy. We currently employ the technique of LUQ trocar placement in patients with previous midline and suprapubic transverse incisions.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1990

[Spontaneous hematoma of the abdominal wall].

Spontaneous hematoma of the abdominal wall is an unusual event which has an aspecific symptomatology, common to other diseases. There are factors which create a predisposition to the formation of hematoma and others which trigger off this phenomenon. The paper reports 8 patients, aged between 35 and 85 years: predisposition, symptomatology, characteristics of hematoma and therapy are illustrated in a table. Diagnosis was generally made using ultrasonography and the prognosis was always benign.

Abdominal Muscles↗