PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Nephrectomy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 415 records · Page 23Linked to original sources

Partial nephrectomy for renal cortical tumors: pathologic findings and impact on outcome.

OBJECTIVES: To review the experience with partial nephrectomy for the diagnosis and treatment of renal cortical tumors at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center with a particular focus on the histologic findings at the time of surgery. METHODS: The results of 292 consecutive partial nephrectomies were reviewed. Demographic data, perioperative complications, and disease status were recorded. The specimens were reviewed for histologic subtyping in accordance with the Heidelberg classification for renal cortical tumors. The probabilities of recurrence and disease-specific death were assessed with the cumulative incidence estimate. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 25.3 months (range 1 to 155). A total of 246 patients (87%) were diagnosed with a renal cortical tumor, 1 patient (less than 1%) was diagnosed with another cancer, and 34 (12%) were diagnosed with benign lesions. The most frequent histologic finding among the renal cortical tumor subgroup was conventional clear cell carcinoma in 148 cases (51%), followed by papillary carcinoma in 54 (18%), oncocytoma in 32 (11%), and chromophobe carcinoma in 21 (7%). Bilateral disease and multifocality were most prevalent in the conventional and papillary subtypes, respectively. The 5-year probability of recurrence and disease-specific death was 12% and 8%, respectively, for the conventional clear cell type. No local or distant disease recurrence was observed in any other renal cortical tumor subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: Partial nephrectomy should be considered a diagnostic and therapeutic surgical approach for renal cortical masses. Conventional clear cell carcinoma is the most frequent histologic subtype and is associated with a less favorable outcome compared with papillary carcinoma and chromophobe carcinoma. Radical nephrectomy for renal lesions that could be removed by partial nephrectomy will risk renal impairment in a substantial proportion of patients with benign disease.

Adult↗

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with suture repair of the pelvicaliceal system.

OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is emerging as a viable minimally invasive nephron-sparing option for select patients with an exophytic renal tumor. With increasing experience, we are applying laparoscopic partial nephrectomy to tumors invading more deeply into the renal parenchyma, necessitating intentional caliceal entry to ensure an adequate margin of resection. In this prospective study, we assessed the safety and efficacy of such substantive renal parenchymal resections that incorporate laparoscopic suture repair of the collecting system. METHODS: Since August 1999, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy was performed in 64 patients with a renal tumor. Our technique routinely involved transient clamping of the renal artery and vein, caliceal suture repair (if necessary), and renal parenchymal suture repair. Intraoperative and postoperative data from the group requiring caliceal repair (group 1, n = 27) were compared with those not requiring caliceal repair (group 2, n = 37). The mean tumor size was 3.4 +/- 1.6 cm in group 1 and 2.6 +/- 0.9 cm in group 2 (P = 0.02). The mean depth of tumor invasion into the renal parenchyma was 1.5 +/- 0.8 cm in group 1 and 0.9 +/- 0.3 cm in group 2 (P = 0.15). RESULTS: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy was technically successful in all 64 cases without any open conversions. Both groups 1 and 2 were comparable in terms of total operative time (3.2 +/- 0.9 hours versus 2.7 +/- 1.0 hours, P = 0.06), tumor excision time (5.9 +/- 1.8 minutes versus 6.0 +/- 1.9 minutes, P = 0.97), and estimated blood loss (241 +/- 306 mL versus 258 +/- 342 mL, P = 0.27). Pelvicaliceal suture repair was associated with a longer warm ischemia time (30.2 +/- 5.4 minutes versus 19.4 +/- 4.9 minutes, P <0.0001), and a greater hospital stay (3.0 +/- 1.7 days versus 1.8 +/- 1.2 days, P = 0.003). No patients in group 1, and 1 patient in group 2, developed an asymptomatic perinephric urinoma that was drained percutaneously. On pathologic examination, inked surgical margins were negative for cancer in all but 1 case; the width of the parenchymal margin on histologic examination was 0.5 +/- 0.4 cm in group 1, and 0.4 +/- 0.3 cm in group 2 (P = 0.59). The mean preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine was 1.1 and 1.2 mg/dL in group 1 and 1.0 and 1.1 mg/dL in group 2, respectively (P = 0.4). During a mean follow-up of 9.5 +/- 3.5 months in group 1 and 15.7 +/- 4 months in group 2, no renal unit developed irreversible ischemic damage or local cancer recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy can be performed safely and efficaciously for select invasive renal tumors with intrarenal extension, even up to the collecting system. Intentional caliceal entry in such cases can be effectively repaired in a watertight manner by laparoscopic freehand suturing, albeit with longer mean operative and warm ischemia times, without adverse renal functional sequelae.

Adult↗

Impact of renal artery multiplicity on outcomes of renal donors and recipients in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To review our laparoscopic donor nephrectomy experience to determine the impact of multiple renal arteries on renal donor and recipient outcomes. Multiple renal arteries can present a challenge during live laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. METHODS: During a 6-year period, 353 patients underwent laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and an equal number of patients underwent living-related renal transplantation. A retrospective chart review was performed to evaluate the renal donors and recipients associated with the laparoscopic procedure. RESULTS: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomies were associated with one renal artery in 277 cases (78.5%), two renal arteries in 71 cases (20.1%), and three renal arteries in 5 cases (1.4%). A left-sided procedure was most commonly performed in all three groups. The operative and renal allograft warm ischemia times increased with the number of renal arteries, but the differences were not statistically significant. The renal artery anatomy did not have a significant association with intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, or complication rate in the donor group. Regarding the transplant recipients, renal artery multiplicity had no significant association with the complication rate, 1-year graft survival, or creatinine clearance levels at 1, 2, or 3 days or at 3, 6, or 12 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: With meticulous procurement and reconstructive transplantation techniques, the presence of multiple renal arteries in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy does not have a significant impact on the outcomes of the renal donors or recipients.

Adolescent↗

Techniques to optimize vascular control during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To review our experience with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for kidney transplantation and describe our technique of vessel ligation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the method of renal artery and vein control during the 97 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies performed at the University of California, San Francisco, since November 1999. In addition, we examined both donor and recipient outcomes after nephrectomy and transplantation in this cohort. RESULTS: Currently, we ligate the renal artery and renal vein using a single Hem-o-lok polymer clip and a single Endo-TA stapler, respectively, and divide the vessels using scissors without securing the graft-side vessels. In contrast to using the Endo-GIA stapler, there is no need to trim staples (approximately 5 mm) from the vessels before anastomosis. Excellent vessel length was achieved in all cases without donor complications, and 99% of recipients had long-term graft function. The only major complications (blood transfusion, conversion to open surgery) occurred early in the series when we used the Endo-GIA stapler to control the vessels. CONCLUSIONS: Although adequate vessel length is typically obtained during left donor nephrectomy, additional length can be achieved using our modification. This may facilitate right donor nephrectomy and help reduce complications, potentially increasing the recovery of right kidneys for transplantation. In addition, performing vessel ligation and division in separate steps is simple, does not change ischemic time, and appears to increase safety.

Anastomosis, Surgical↗

Three-dimensional imaging and display of renal tumors using spiral CT: a potential aid to partial nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVE: A new technique for creating three-dimensional (3D) images of renal tumors using contrast-enhanced spiral computed tomography (CT) is described and preliminarily investigated. METHODS: 3D spiral CT was employed in 2 patients before radical nephrectomy and in 5 patients before partial nephrectomy. Preoperative and postoperative image analyses were conducted to evaluate the ability of the images to depict key anatomic relationships in planning partial nephrectomies. RESULTS: 3D spiral CT defined the tumor's location and relationship to the kidney surface better than the tumor's proximity to renal hilar vessels and collecting system. Negative surgical margins were obtained in all 4 patients with renal cell carcinoma, and post-operative serum creatinine remained less than 2 mg/dL in all 5 patients after partial nephrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: This early experience suggests that 3D spiral CT can help in the planning of partial nephrectomy and in attaining complete resection of renal cell carcinoma while conserving normal renal tissue.

Adult↗

Comparison of direct hospital costs and length of stay for radical nephrectomy versus nephron-sparing surgery in the management of localized renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: Recent work has demonstrated comparable surgical results and 5-year cancer-specific survival rates between radical nephrectomy and nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) in the treatment of patients with small (4 cm or smaller) solitary renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). However, differences exist in the intraoperative management and postoperative care of patients undergoing NSS versus radical nephrectomy, and we sought to compare direct hospital costs and length of stay (LOS) between these two groups to determine whether either treatment imparts a specific cost advantage. METHODS: Data were retrieved from medical records and administrative data sets containing billing encounters for all costs incurred during hospitalization at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation. Individual costs were grouped together using nine cost center categories encompassing every aspect of direct hospital care, including anesthesiology, laboratory, radiology, nursing, pharmaceutical, and emergency services, and medical care, surgical care, and miscellaneous costs. Each cost center was further subdivided, and a total of 52 cost subcategories were assessed. The total direct costs of hospitalization were compared using a multivariate regression model in which patient demographics and tumor characteristics, type and year of surgery, LOS, and cost center categories were assessed as single and interactive factors. Postoperative complication and cancer-specific survival rates were also compared to identify any potential therapeutic differences between the two groups. RESULTS: Between 1991 and 1995, 80 patients underwent surgery at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation for solitary RCCs 4 cm or smaller, including 52 partial and 28 radical nephrectomies. We found no difference in the postoperative complication rate or cancer-specific survival rate between the two surgical groups. Total direct hospital costs and LOS were not statistically different between the NSS and radical nephrectomy groups (P >0.05). This was further supported by our multivariate model, which accounted for 61% of the observed variance in the total costs (F = 12.11, P = 0.0001). The type of surgery was not associated with total cost when controlling for all other factors, including age, sex, year of surgery, tumor size, grade, and stage, and postoperative complications (P = 0.7). There was no significant interaction between the type of surgery and the LOS (P = 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that elective NSS can be performed with equivalent direct hospital costs and LOS when compared with patients undergoing radical nephrectomy for small solitary RCCs. These data have significant economic implications for the comparison of competing surgical treatment strategies for localized RCC.

Aged↗

Thoracoabdominal radical nephrectomy: is a postoperative thoracostomy tube necessary?

OBJECTIVES: To report our results of patients undergoing thoracoabdominal radical nephrectomy without intraoperative placement of a thoracostomy tube. It has been routine in our hospital to not place a thoracostomy tube in patients undergoing thoracoabdominal radical nephrectomy since 1988. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 47 thoracoabdominal radical nephrectomies performed from January 1988 through November 1998 at our institution. Of the 47 patients, 39 did not have a thoracostomy tube placed intraoperatively; the other 8 patients did. The development of all postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and hospital charges were noted. RESULTS: No postoperative mortality was noted in our study. Of the 47 patients in the study, 20 patients had a total of 29 complications. The overall number of complications was not increased in the group without a thoracostomy tube compared with the group with a thoracostomy tube (P = 0.104). No patient treated without a thoracostomy tube required subsequent placement of a tube for persistent pneumothorax. The mean length of hospital stay in patients with a thoracostomy tube after radical nephrectomy was 9.14 +/- 2.65 days; in patients without a thoracostomy tube, the mean length of stay was 7.07 +/- 3.97 days (P = 0.071). CONCLUSIONS: In patients without parietal pleural injury, thoracoabdominal radical nephrectomy without the placement of a thoracostomy tube can be performed safely and effectively, with a low risk of postoperative complications and a decrease in the overall hospital stay and hospital charges.

Adult↗

Thoracoscopic transdiaphragmatic nephrectomy: feasibility study.

OBJECTIVES: Large-sized upper pole renal or adrenal tumors are often excised by the open thoracoabdominal approach. As an adjunct to existing transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic approaches, we explore a novel minimally invasive technique, the thoracoscopic transdiaphragmatic approach, for performing nephrectomy. METHODS: Thoracoscopic transdiaphragmatic nephrectomy was performed bilaterally in 4 farm pigs (8 kidneys) using three ports placed intercostally. RESULTS: The mean surgical time was 69.3 minutes on the left side and 74.3 minutes on the right. Blood loss was 18.7 mL. The mean size of the diaphragmatic incision was 7.2 cm. Adequate retraction of the spleen and liver was feasible during left and right-sided nephrectomy, respectively. Excellent and expeditious access to the renal hilum was routinely obtained. In 5 of 8 procedures, the diaphragmatic incision was located peripherally along the posterior margin; difficulty in suture repair of the diaphragmatic incision was noted in each instance because of the thin diaphragm in this location. During porcine left nephrectomy with ipsilateral lung collapse (n = 4), arterial blood gases and end-tidal carbon dioxide remained normal. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracoscopic transdiaphragmatic nephrectomy is feasible. This technique provides excellent and unique visualization of the renal vessels and the upper pole of the kidney and adrenal gland. When indicated, the thoracoscopic transdiaphragmatic approach, used in combination with current laparoscopic techniques, has the potential to provide the minimally invasive counterpart of the thoracoabdominal surgical approach in select patients with upper pole renal or adrenal pathologic findings.

Animals↗

The role of partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma in contemporary practice.

Partial nephrectomy has proved to be a safe and effective treatment modality, even for patients with normal contralateral kidneys. The indications for elective partial nephrectomy continue to evolve as contemporary series demonstrate low morbidity approaching that of radical nephrectomy. Furthermore, patients who undergo partial nephrectomy have a significantly decreased risk of future renal insufficiency. As such, a rationale exists for expanding indications in an era of excellent technical outcomes and increased patient longevity. Characterization of newer diagnostic (three-dimensional imaging) and treatment (laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, cryosurgery) modalities will allow continued evolution of nephron-sparing techniques.

Carcinoma, Renal Cell↗

The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Cytoreductive nephrectomy can be an important and effective component of a multidisciplinary treatment approach to metastatic renal cell carcinoma in carefully selected patients. The results of retrospective single institution series and randomized multicenter phase III trials suggest that removal of the primary tumor, even in the setting of metastatic disease, can significantly prolong survival and delay time to progression. It may also enhance the response to systemic therapy in the postoperative period. When employing initial cytoreductive nephrectomy as part of an overall treatment approach, careful patient selection is critical to success. A poor performance status (ECOG performance status less than 1), significant comorbidities that make surgical intervention high risk, or high-volume metastatic disease, and the presence of brain, liver, or bone metastases, or of atypical (sarcomatoid) histology have all been shown to be associated with an extremely poor prognosis. Patients exhibiting these clinical phenotypes should not be considered for initial cytoreductive nephrectomy as part of their treatment paradigm. Instead, they should receive some form of upfront systemic therapy (immunotherapy or novel therapy) and then be considered for delayed nephrectomy as part of a surgical consolidation approach after an interval of treatment if their disease kinetics demonstrate stable or regressing disease in response to systemic therapy. Patients who do not demonstrate these poor prognostic features should be considered for upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy as part of their overall treatment approach because of the potential it offers for palliation from local tumor symptoms, a delay in the time to disease progression, an improved response to systemic therapy, and improved overall survival.

Carcinoma, Renal Cell↗

Patients' attitudes about living donor transplantation and living donor nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND: The growing shortage of organs available for transplantation has resulted in an increased use of living donors for kidney transplantation. The laparoscopic nephrectomy is a new procedure used to remove kidneys from donors. The study objective was to explore the attitudes of recipients and donors toward living donor kidney transplantation and the impact of the laparoscopic donor nephrectomy on donors' and recipients' acceptance of living donor kidney transplantation. METHODS: Tailored self-administered questionnaires were mailed to kidney donors, potential donors, recipients and potential recipients who visited the University of Maryland School of Medicine Division of Transplantation between January 1998 and May 2001. RESULTS: The laparoscopic donor nephrectomy helped recipients and potential recipients with their decision to accept a kidney from a living donor (recipients: 53% strongly agreed, 36% agreed; potential recipients: 42% strongly agreed, 46% agreed). To a lesser extent, the laparoscopic donor nephrectomy assisted donors and potential donors with their decision to donate (donors: 19% strongly agreed, 20% agreed; potential donors: 20% strongly agreed, 20% agreed). Potential recipients and recipients identified 2 barriers to accepting living donor kidney transplantation: they were unwilling to accept a kidney if it meant this would financially burden their donors, and they worried that their donors might succumb to a future kidney problem. CONCLUSION: Overall, the study found a positive attitude toward living donor kidney transplantation and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. This new surgical procedure seemed to positively influence recipients and potential recipients to accept a kidney. In contrast, it had less impact on donors' and potential donors' willingness to give their kidney.

Adult↗

Evidence for activation of tubuloglomerular feedback following nephrectomy in human subjects.

The intrarenal regulation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) following a reduction in renal mass was evaluated in six normal subjects, studied before and 4 to 6 weeks after undergoing unilateral nephrectomy, performed for the purpose of living-related transplantation. The role of the tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) system in regulating the final GFR on both occasions was assessed by determining the increase in GFR over baseline levels following blockade of TGF by a single dose of bumetanide, care being taken to replace sodium and water losses. Before donor nephrectomy, baseline GFR was 115 +/- 7 mL/min, which increased by 9.5% +/- 2.5% to 126 +/- 9 mL/min following the removal of TGF. Four to six weeks following donor nephrectomy, the baseline GFR was 83 +/- 8 mL/min, confirming significant hyperfiltration in the remaining kidney. After administration of bumetanide, the GFR increased by 15.6% +/- 3.1% to 96 +/- 9 mL/min. This greater fractional increase (P < 0.025) indicates an increase in tonic TGF activity in the uninephrectomized state compared with that demonstrated before nephrectomy. The results suggest that the hyperfiltration response following unilateral nephrectomy is limited by an appropriately activated TGF system. This phenomenon may be of importance in the maintenance of Na and water homeostasis, as well as limiting the pathological consequences that may result from, or be exacerbated by, an excessively high filtration rate in the remaining nephrons. Thus, dietary or therapeutic maneuvers that impair the TGF response may be best avoided following a reduction in renal mass.

Adult↗

Retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy using microwave coagulation for small renal tumors.

OBJECTIVES: The outcome of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using a microwave tissue coagulator for treatment of small renal tumors was studied. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From June 1999 to May 2001, eight patients with small renal tumors of less than 5.0cm in diameter (1.0-5.0cm, T1N0M0) underwent retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy. To control bleeding during the partial nephrectomy, the renal parenchyma around the tumor was coagulated using a microwave tissue coagulator with a needle of 1.5cm length. The tumor was circumscribed within the coagulated area with 8-13 punctures of the coagulation needle, and partial nephrectomy was performed using scissors and bipolar forceps. RESULTS: All eight patients successfully underwent the procedure retroperitoneoscopically. The average operative time was 295 minutes and the average blood loss was 129ml. Three patients showed urine leakage from the renal calyces, which was controlled by suturing retroperitoneoscopically. In two patients, the surgical margin was revealed to be positive for renal cell carcinoma by frozen section pathology and additional resection was performed in these individuals. The patients were discharged from the hospital with almost full convalescence on day 10 on average. Within the mean follow-up period of 10.4 months, no recurrence was found when examined with computer tomography (CT) using contrast media. As a complication, one patient experienced a decrease in function of the operated kidney caused by unknown reason. CONCLUSION: Retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy using a microwave tissue coagulator is useful for treatment of small renal tumors located at the peripheral area of the kidney. Bleeding from the renal parenchymal incision site is well controlled without occlusion of the renal artery with additional use of a bipolar coagulator, when necessary. Further experience and long-term follow-up are mandatory however, to establish the usefulness of this technique.

Adult↗

Chronic renal artery occlusion: nephrectomy versus revascularization.

PURPOSE: The surgical management of chronic atherosclerotic renal artery occlusion (RA-OCC) was studied. METHODS: From January 1987 through December 1996, 397 consecutive patients were treated for atherosclerotic renal artery disease. Ninety-five hypertensive patients (mean blood pressure, 204 +/- 31/106 +/- 20 mm Hg; mean medications, 3.0 +/- 1.1 drugs) were treated for 100 RA-OCCs. Eighty-four (88%) patients had renal dysfunction, defined by serum creatinine levels >/=1.3 mg/dL (mean serum creatinine level, 2.8 +/- 2.0 mg/dL). Demographic characteristics, operative morbidity and mortality, blood pressure/renal function response, and postoperative decline in renal function were examined and compared with that of 302 patients treated for renal artery stenosis (RAS). RESULTS: After operation, there were 5 perioperative deaths (5.2%), 2 (2.8%) after revascularization and 3 (12%) after nephrectomy (P =.11), compared with 12 (4.0%) perioperative deaths in the RAS group (P =.59). After controlling for important covariates, estimated survival and blood pressure benefits did not differ between RA-OCC patients treated by nephrectomy or revascularization (P =.13; 87% vs 92%, P =.54). Excretory renal function was considered improved in 49% of 79 RA-OCC patients with renal dysfunction, including 9 patients removed from dialysis-dependence. Among patients treated for unilateral disease, revascularization for RA-OCC was associated with significant improvement in renal function (P <.01); however, nephrectomy alone did not increase renal function significantly. Improved renal function after operation was associated with a significant and independent increase in survival (P <.01) and dialysis-free survival (P <.01) among patients treated for RA-OCC. In addition, blood pressure benefit, renal function response, and estimated survival did not differ significantly after reconstruction for RA-OCC or RAS. CONCLUSION: Among hypertensive patients treated for RA-OCC, equivalent beneficial blood pressure response was observed after both revascularization and nephrectomy. In patients who underwent bilateral renal artery revascularization, the change in excretory renal function attributable to repair of RA-OCC cannot be defined. In patients treated for unilateral disease, however, improvement in function was observed only after revascularization. Moreover, improved renal function demonstrated a significant and independent association with improved survival. This experience supports renal revascularization in preference to nephrectomy for RA-OCC in select hypertensive patients when a normal distal artery is demonstrated at operation.

Adult↗

Effect of unilateral nephrectomy on three patients with histopathological evidence of diabetic glomerulosclerosis in the resected kidney.

Diabetes mellitus and surgical ablation of renal tissue are two independent influences associated with hyperfiltration and elevated levels of the glomerular transcapillary hydraulic pressure differential (delta P). There is increasing evidence that hyperfiltration with elevated delta P is pathogenic and leads to glomerular damage. The authors questioned whether these two influences (surgical ablation of renal tissue and diabetes mellitus) would act in an additive fashion in human patients to produce an accelerated decline in renal function. Three patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus who had undergone a unilateral nephrectomy (for a variety of reasons) were (retrospectively) identified. In each patient, morphologic evidence of diabetic glomerulonephropathy was present in the resected kidney. The charts from these patients were reviewed and post-nephrectomy renal function was estimated over time by plotting reciprocal serum creatine values versus time. Follow-up intervals after nephrectomy varied from 4 to 15 years. The results of our follow-up showed no obvious detrimental effect on renal function (as measured by 1/serum creatinine) attributable to the unilateral nephrectomy. The authors conclude that residual renal function (and ultimate outcome) in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus is highly variable, but does not seem to be adversely affected (at least over the time span of observation in these patients) by unilateral nephrectomy.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2↗

Laparoscopic nephrectomy: new standard of care?

OBJECTIVE: The pace of implementation of a laparoscopic nephrectomy programme is affected by factors including surgical expertise, case load, learning curves and outcome audits. We report our experience in introducing a laparoscopic nephrectomy programme over a 3-year period. METHODS: From January 2001 to December 2003, 187 nephrectomies were performed (105 by conventional surgery, 82 by laparoscopy). Hand-assisted laparoscopy was used predominantly. The indications for surgery, factors affecting the approach and outcome parameters were studied. A cost comparison was made between patients with similar-sized renal tumours undergoing laparoscopic versus open surgery. RESULTS: Most operations were performed for malignancy in both the open (70%) and laparoscopic (67%) surgery groups. The laparoscopic approach was most commonly used in upper tract transitional cell cancers (TCCs; 70% of 30 patients) and benign pathologies (49% of 35 patients), followed by radical nephrectomies (34% of 99 patients) and donor nephrectomies (44% of 23 patients). There was a rapid rise in laparoscopic surgeries, from 30% in 2001 to 58% in 2002. The median hospital stay was 5.8 days in the laparoscopic group and 8.1 days in the open surgery group. The procedure cost for laparoscopic surgery was 4,943 dollars compared with 4,479 dollars for open surgery. However, due to a shorter hospital stay, the total hospital cost was slightly lower in the laparoscopic group (7,500 dollars versus 7,907 dollars). CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic approach for various renal pathologies was quickly established with a rapid increase in the number of laparoscopic procedures.

Humans↗

Multiple renal arteries do not pose an impediment to the routine use of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

UNLABELLED: Since the first description by Ratner and collegues in 1996, laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy is gaining wide acceptance in an attempt to minimize the donor morbidity, length of hospital stay and length of time to return to work. It is unknown whether multiple renal arteries pose additional problems with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. In November 1998, our institution initiated laparoscopic donor nephrectomy program. In the ensuing 19 months, we performed 25 living donor renal transplants, 24 of them using laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. The left kidney was procured in all cases. Eight donor candidates (33%) had two or more renal arteries (two arteries in five patients and three patients). RESULTS: In six cases (25%), findings at surgery differed from the CT angography results (in four cases, CT angiogram reported fewer arteries than were found at surgery and in two cases it reported more). We found no significant differences in both donor outcomes and recipient, based on the presence or absence of multiple renal arteries. Among donor outcomes, we found equivalent results for donor warm ischemia time total donor operating time, and donor length of stay. For recipient outcomes, we found no significant differences between groups for the incidence of acute tubular necrosis (ATN), graft survival and most recent serum creatinine. In one case, we constructed two arteries into a single conduit on the backtable prior to transplantation. However, in most cases with multiple arteries, we implanted the arteries separately into the recipient external iliac artery. Based on this experience, we do not find the presence of multiple renal arteries to be a barrier to the successful use of kidney grafts procured by laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

Adult↗

Prevention of interstitial pressure change at unilateral nephrectomy by prostaglandin synthesis inhibition.

The mechanisms underlying the adaptive process in the remaining kidney after unilateral nephrectomy are not well known. In the present study adaptive changes in interstitial pressure conditions following uninephrectomy were investigated in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Direct subcapsular hydrostatic pressure recordings were made via microcatheters , renal lymph was collected for lymph flow rate estimations and determinations of lymph protein content and the urine flow rate and urinary excretion of sodium and potassium were measured, before and after contralateral nephrectomy. There was a significant rise in subcapsular hydrostatic pressure by about 50%, and in the lymph flow rate, by more than 100%, within 1 hr after nephrectomy. The protein concentration in collected renal lymph was significantly decreased (from 2.30 +/- 0.25 to 1.45 +/- 0.26 g/dl), compared with control collections in sham-operated animals (from 2.22 +/- 0.23 to 1.78 +/- 0.19 g/dl). These findings indicate an increased hydrostatic and decreased intersititial pressure in response to contralateral nephrectomy. Urine flow rate and electrolyte excretion were significantly elevated (urine flow rate by 92%, sodium excretion from 0.210 +/- 0.035 to 0.352 +/- 0.067 mumoles/min and potassium excretion from 0.306 +/- 0.074 to 1.617 +/- 0.228 mumoles/min). Inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis prior to nephrectomy abolished the lymph flow increase and oncotic pressure decrease and also the diuretic and natriuretic responses. The adaptively increased potassium excretion was, however, only blocked by diclofenac sodium and not by indomethacin. These results demonstrate the important role of the renal interstitium and the prostaglandin system in the renal adaptation to nephron loss.

Adaptation, Physiological↗