SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Reproducibility”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 415 records · Page 23Linked to original sources

PubMed1998

Reproducibility of 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring in pediatric patients.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the widespread use of 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring for evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux in infants and children, there is little published information regarding the reproducibility of ambulatory pH studies in this patient population. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the reproducibility of 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring in pediatric patients. METHODS: We prospectively investigated 26 patients with symptoms suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux (14 females and 12 males) ranging in age from 1 month to 18 years (mean, 9.2 years). The patients underwent extended intraesophageal pH monitoring over two consecutive 24-hour periods. RESULTS: Data analysis revealed that the overall reproducibility of ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring is only 69% (r = 0.32). Eight of 26 patients had conflicting results on day 1 compared with results on day 2. Of the 8 patients with conflicting results on day 1 versus day 2, 5 had normal studies on day 1, but demonstrated pathologic reflux on day 2. Thus, the false-negative rate for day 1 was 19.2%. The kappa statistic calculated for the total time the pH was abnormal was 0.32, with values < 0.4 representing poor correlation. Spearman correlation coefficients indicated that the percentage of time with pH < 4 (r = 0.64) and the number of reflux episodes (r = 0.71) per 24-hour period are the most reproducible pH parameters. CONCLUSION: The reproducibility of 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring in the pediatric population is suboptimal. The investigation should be extended or repeated if the result does not correlate with the patient's clinical history.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1995

Reproducibility of periodontal probing using a conventional manual and an automated force-controlled electronic probe.

A total of 1,128 sites in 15 periodontal maintenance patients were examined twice, 7 to 10 days apart, to evaluate reproducibility of periodontal probing by a conventional manual and an automated force-controlled electronic probe. Probing depths (PD) and relative attachment levels (AL) were recorded to the nearest 0.5 mm with both instruments. At each visit, all sites were probed first with the conventional and then with the electronic probe. Reproducibility of PD at shallow sites (PD < or = 3 mm) by the manual probe was 59.1% for exact agreement and 98.6% within +/- 1.0 mm variation. For the electronic probe, corresponding values were 41.3% and 91.5%, respectively. Reproducibility of PD measurements at deeper sites (PD > 3 mm), was 33.0% for exact match and 96.4% within +/- 1.0 mm for the manual and, correspondingly, 31.7% and 85.9% for the electronic probe. Reproducibility of AL followed a similar pattern, but was consistently lower than for PD. Reproducibility was consistently higher for anterior than for posterior sites and, for some comparisons, higher in the maxilla than in the mandible. These differences were smaller for the manual than for the electronic probe. Time required to complete the probing was longer for the conventional probe than for the electronic instrument. Under the prevailing study conditions, the automated force-controlled electronic probe failed to offer significant advantages over the conventional manual probe.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility in keratinized tissue width assessment with 3 methods for mucogingival junction determination.

BACKGROUND: Although the need for "adequate" amount of keratinized tissue (KT) for periodontal health is questionable, the mucogingival junction (MGJ) often serves as a measurement landmark in periodontal evaluations. Limited information is available on the reproducibility of KT width (KTW) assessment. The purpose of this study was to assess intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility in measuring KTW by using 3 different methods to identify MGJ location. METHODS: Fifteen patients provided 17 teeth which had undergone a gingival augmentation procedure (connective tissue graft; surgery group) and an equal number of contralateral, non-treated teeth (control group). At the midbuccal aspect of each tooth, KTW was assessed by 2 independent examiners after MGJ identification by the visual (VM), functional (FM), and visual with histochemical staining (HM) method. Data analysis was based on intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and 3-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for differences between replicate measurements. RESULTS: KTW was significantly different between treated and control teeth. No significant differences in KTW were found in relation to method for MGJ determination and examiner. Intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility was high, regardless of treatment status or method for MGJ determination (ICC = 0.92 - 0.99). Standard deviations of the difference between replicate measurements ranged from 0.46 mm for VM to 0.21 mm for HM. CONCLUSIONS: Intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility has been shown to be substantially consistent when different methods for MGJ determination are used to measure the apico-coronal dimension of the gingiva. The level of reproducibility does not seem to be affected whether or not the mucogingival complex has been surgically altered by a gingival augmentation procedure.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the modified Ficat classification system of osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Anteroposterior and lateral plain radiographs of 116 osteonecrotic femoral heads were reviewed to assess the interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the modified Ficat classification system. The radiographs were reviewed initially and then again six months later by three adult reconstructive surgeons, two general orthopaedic surgeons, two orthopaedic residents, and one musculoskeletal radiologist. All eight observers agreed on the classification of twenty hips (17 per cent) at both the first and the second review of the radiographs. Paired comparisons revealed a mean interobserver kappa reliability coefficient of 0.46 (range, 0.30 to 0.67) for the first review and 0.45 (range, 0.30 to 0.66) for the second. For all observers, the mean rate of perfect agreement between the first and the second review was 68 per cent (range, 56 to 80 per cent). The mean kappa value for intraobserver reproducibility was 0.59 (range, 0.44 [one of the residents] to 0.73 [one of the general orthopaedic surgeons]). No observer or pair of observers had excellent reproducibility or reliability (kappa > 0.75). The poor interobserver reliability and fair intraobserver reproducibility diminishes any meaningful comparison of studies in which the modified Ficat classification system has been used and illuminates the need for a more reliable and reproducible classification system.

Femur Head Necrosis↗

PubMed1998

Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the system of King et al. for the classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

The classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with use of the system of King et al. has become widely accepted since its introduction. The purpose of the present study was to establish the interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of this classification system. The preoperative radiographs of sixty-three patients who were managed operatively for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were classified by five observers with the system of King et al. Interobserver reliability was assessed by comparison of the classification of the curves among the observers, and intraobserver reproducibility was evaluated by comparison of the classifications of each set of radiographs by each observer on two occasions three weeks apart. The median interobserver reliability kappa coefficient for the classification system of King et al. was 0.44 (range, 0.28 to 0.50), and the median intraobserver reproducibility kappa coefficient was 0.64 (range, 0.44 to 0.72). According to the definition of Landis and Koch, the classification system of King et al. is substantially reproducible but is only moderately reliable. However, according to the stricter definition of Svanholm et al., its reproducibility is only fair and its reliability is poor.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

Reproducibility of self-administered questionnaire in epidemiological surveys.

We evaluated the reproducibility of data on intake frequency of 33 food items, beverage intake frequency of 3 items, drinking and smoking habits, and past history of 10 diseases obtained from a self-administered questionnaire. The survey subjects consisted of 263 aged 39 to 79 years individuals in the general population. After about one year interval these subjects consecutively participated in two surveys and were unintentionally requested to answer to the same questionnaire. The means of percent exact agreements for 33 food items were 48.4% in all, 42.7% in males and 49.4% in females. The means of their percent agreements within one category difference were 85.4% in all, 83.3% in males and 85.8% in females. The reproducibility of beverage intake frequency was the highest in green tea, followed in order by black tea and coffee. The percent exact agreements were 85.4% in males and 81.8% in females for drinking habit, 87.5% in males and 99.0% in females for smoking habit, and 93.7% in males and 97.2% in females for past history. The reproducibility of the self-administered questionnaire was the highest in past history, followed in order by smoking habit, drinking habit and dietary habit. The values of reproducibility were higher in females than in males except for drinking habit. Although reduction of categories was needed to improve the reproducibility, the obtained values from the self-administered questionnaire were sufficiently high for epidemiological studies.

Alcohol Drinking↗

PubMed1996

Ambulatory blood pressure reproducibility and application of the method in a healthy Finnish cohort.

The aim of the present study has been to study the reproducibility, validity and normal values of ambulatory blood pressure measurement in a healthy Finnish cohort. The reproducibility of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was examined in healthy volunteers and normal values were determined in a Finnish cohort of males and women of different ages. In the reproducibility study the recording was repeated at 2-week intervals. In the validity study simultaneous measurements were done manually with a mercury sphygmomanometer and compared with the measurement by the ambulatory blood pressure recording unit, both connected with the cuff by a T-tube; this study included 100 consecutive measurements in a patient group. A relatively small cohort was taken from the normal value study group. In addition to ambulatory blood pressure their left ventricle mass was also determined by echocardiography. The correlation between manual blood pressure measurement and simultaneous measurement by the ambulatory blood pressure unit was 0.98. In the reproducibility study the correlations between the two 24-h measurements 2 weeks apart were also good. Depending on the parameter (daytime, nighttime or 24-h blood pressure mean, systolic or diastolic values) the correlation coefficient varied between 0.81 and 0.91. Thus both systolic and diastolic blood pressures, whether expressed as 24-h averages and daytime or nighttime averages, correlated well between these two recording sessions. The data obtained in the present Finnish cohort were well within the published reference value limits, showing only fairly modest age-dependence appearing at quite an old age. There was no significant correlation between the left ventricle mass and ambulatory blood pressure values in a population having normal blood pressure. The results suggest good intra-individual correlation and reproducibility in ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, suggesting this method to be useful in the monitoring of individual blood pressure levels. The validity of the method is good and the published reference values can be applied with reasonable reliability in different populations. In an adult population with normal blood pressure, no correlation between left ventricle mass and blood pressure values can be found, suggesting this correlation may first appear in cohorts including persons with elevated blood pressure values.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1990

Reproducibility of ambulatory gastric pH recordings in the corpus and antrum. Effect of food, time, and electrode position.

The reproducibility of simultaneous, long-term, ambulatory gastric pH recordings in the antrum and corpus was investigated in nine healthy subjects who underwent three separate, 27-h gastric double pH-metries. Intraindividual reproducibility for the entire 27-h recording period was good in the corpus (Kendall's concordance coefficient, W' = 0.6393, p less than 0.025) but not in the antrum (W' = 0.4806, NS). Analysis of predefined time periods showed that non-meal daytime pH was reproducible in the corpus (W' = 0.6531, p less than 0.025) but not in the antrum (W' = 0.3395, NS), whereas mealtime pH was reproducible in the antrum (W' = 0.7159, p less than 0.005) but not in the corpus (W' = 0.4954, NS); nocturnal pH was not reproducible in either the antrum or the corpus. These results reflect the functional separation of corpus and antrum and their differing responses to food. Thus, studies of gastric acidity over long periods should be conducted in the corpus, whereas studies of gastric acidity over shorter, meal-related periods should be conducted with a second electrode in the antrum.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Reproducibility of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire to assess the intake of fats and cholesterol in The Netherlands.

The reproducibility of a 104 item semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire to estimate the intake of energy, fat, fatty acids and cholesterol was assessed in a group of 93 men and women in the Netherlands. The questionnaire was administered by trained interviewers. Subjects were asked to recall the consumption of 104 items during the past month. A second interview was conducted 8 weeks later. The mean difference in nutrient intake between the two assessments was very small, with a maximum of 5% for cholesterol intake, but the variance of individual differences was considerable. Pearson correlation coefficients between two assessments 8 weeks apart ranged from 0.71 for polyunsaturated fatty acids intake (when expressed as percentage of energy intake) up to 0.91 for energy intake. The reproducibility was found to be similar in males and females. Reproducibility was assessed for separate food items as well as for 20 food groups. Items consumed were often highly reproducible and rarely had a poor reproducibility. This food frequency questionnaire is considered to be a suitable tool to estimate and monitor the intake of fat, fatty acids and cholesterol in the Netherlands.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

A comparison of interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in Japan and the United States.

CONTEXT: Gleason grading is now the sole prostatic carcinoma grading system recommended by the World Health Organization. It is imperative that there be good interobserver reproducibility within this system worldwide. To our knowledge, there are no studies, using the same specimens, that compare the interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading in Japan and the United States. OBJECTIVE: To compare the interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in Japan and the United States using, in Japan, images from the identical biopsy glass slides that were originally graded in the United States. DESIGN: Microsopic images from 37 needle biopsies of prostatic carcinoma were placed on CD-ROM and distributed to 14 Japanese pathologists for grading. These 14 physicians included 8 general pathologists and 6 pathologists with a special interest in urologic pathology. The needle biopsies had been previously reviewed so that a consensus diagnosis could be formed by a panel of urologic pathologists in the United States and Canada. Interobserver agreement with the consensus diagnoses was calculated by determining the overall kappa coefficient for the Japanese pathologists and then compared to the interobserver agreement among American general pathologists who had previously graded identical needle biopsies from which the CD-ROM images had been taken. RESULTS: The interobserver agreement with the consensus diagnoses for the 4 Gleason grading groups (Gleason grades 2-4, 5-6, 7, and 8-10) among the Japanese urologic pathologists in this series of cases was substantial (overall kappa = 0.68), and for the Japanese general pathologists, it was moderate (overall kappa = 0.49), similar to that reported in the earlier study of American general pathologists (overall kappa = 0.44). The major interobserver reproducibility problem for both Japanese and American general pathologists is undergrading. The major areas of undergrading are the underdiagnosis of Gleason scores 5-6 as Gleason scores 2-4, and the underdiagnosis of cribriform sheets and fragments of cribriform Gleason pattern 4 carcinoma as Gleason pattern 3. CONCLUSIONS: The interobserver reproducibility of the Gleason grading for this collection of specimens was similar among Japanese and American general pathologists. The overall kappa values for these generalists of 0.44 and 0.49 are only in the moderate (0.41-0.60) range of interobserver agreement when compared to 0.68, substantial (0.61-0.80) agreement, for Japanese urologic pathologists. Educational efforts to improve Gleason grading have been shown to be effective and are clearly warranted.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Repeatability and reproducibility of germicide tests: a literature review.

The results of a quantitative antimicrobial assay can be summarized by the log reduction value. For an assay to be proposed as a standard method, it is usually necessary to conduct a collaborative study to demonstrate that the repeatability and reproducibility standard deviations (SDs) of the log reduction values are sufficiently small. It is not clear, however, precisely how small those SDs should be. This paper describes the results of a literature review conducted to determine the range of repeatability and reproducibility SDs for standard quantitative antimicrobial assays. The underlying premise is that, for an assay to have been accepted as a standard method, its repeatability and reproducibility SDs must have been sufficiently small. This premise implies that the repeatability and reproducibility SDs of standard assays establish de facto guidelines for acceptability. The survey comprised papers where the SDs could be extracted directly or where they could be calculated from accessible data. Papers describing suspension tests as well as hard surface tests were included. For the standard antimicrobial assays reviewed, repeatability SDs ranged from 0.25 to 1.21 and the reproducibility SDs ranged from 0.31 to 1.54.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

PubMed2000

Intra- and interindividual reproducibility of heart rate variations in the tilt-table test.

Various methods are used for the routine diagnosis of autonomic regulation disorders. The evaluation of blood pressure and heart rate response during active orthostasis together with assessment of the 30/15-ratio (Ewing's ratio) was proven to be a valid method. One main disadvantage of these tests is their dependence on the active cooperation of the patient. In contrast, passive orthostasis using the tilt-table may also be carried out in bed-ridden patients. The test comprises a manual tilting manoeuvre of the patient lying on the tilt-table, with continuous assessment of heart rate and blood pressure. Until now, the main advantages of the tilt-table test were considered to be its better standardisation and good reproducibility, especially with regard to the diagnosis of vasovagal syncope. Several authors have postulated a specific pattern of initial heart rate response in healthy patients, showing characteristic changes in cases of underlying autonomic neuropathy. However, the diagnostic relevance of these tests is dependent on the reproducibility of the course of initial heart rate response. The objective of our study was to assess the intra- and interindividual reproducibility of initial heart rate response in the tilt-table test in healthy subjects. The tilt-table test was repeated 10 times in all 40 subjects under standardised conditions, and heart rate and blood pressure response were presented in a diagram. Reproducible courses of initial heart rate response were not seen, neither on intra- nor on interindividual comparison. After an initial rise, most subjects showed a rather horizontal course of heart rate, whereas others presented a heart rate response similar to that in the Ewing test, with an initial rise of heart rate around the 15th beat, followed by a decrease, and a maximum around the 30th beat. However, all subjects showed considerable variations in heart rate response within the 10 tilting manoeuvres. A reliable quotient comparable with the 30/15 ratio (Ewing's ratio) in active orthostasis was not seen. Based on these results, we conclude that the initial heart rate response in the tilt-table test is not suitable for routine diagnosis of autonomic regulation disorders, since it is not sufficiently reproducible in healthy individuals.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2001

Reproducibility and reliability of measurements using a linear isokinetic dynamometer, Aristokin.

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to investigate the intra-observer reproducibility and reliability of measurements using a linear isokinetic dynamometer (Aristokin). METHODS: Sixteen female volunteers (age 18 to 23 years) participated in 4 test sessions, each consisting of 6 warming-up movements followed by 6 repetitions of 4 different movements. During each session, the subjects consecutively performed lifting movements by flexing elbows and shoulders (at 65 cm per sec), total lifting movements with arms and legs (at 65 cm per sec), and extension movements of the legs in sitting position (at 40 and 60 cm per sec). The first 3 test sessions were performed at a weekly interval, the 4th was executed 4 weeks after the 3rd session. Force, power and explosivity (force developed per sec) were recorded. RESULTS: The intra-observer reproducibility was investigated of the 6 repetitions of the movements during each test session. The highest reproducibility for mean peak power and force was found in the combination of the 3rd, 4th, 5th and 6th measurement (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.85 to 0.99). Using this combination, the intra-observer reliability was investigated, defined as the consistency of results obtained during the 4 test sessions, performed at a weekly or longer interval. Comparison between these sessions showed that the results for mean force in the arm movement differed significantly (p=0.01) although a high between sessions correlation was found (0.96). Results for mean force and power for the 3 other movements were reliable, and no significant learning effect was observed. Lower reliability and reproducibility were observed for other parameters including explosivity and power and force at the first 0.25 sec of the test movement. CONCLUSIONS: Even after standard warming-up movements, the first 2 out of 6 measurement repetitions during a test session are not reproducible and should not be used in calculations of the results. For the combination of the 3rd to 6th repetitions, a high reliability was found for the measurement of mean force and power of the total lifting movement and of the sitting leg extension movements repeated in 4 sessions over a period of 6 weeks.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2001

[Reproducibility of the centric relation mandibular position].

The centric relation (CR) is an important position either diagnostically or therapeutically. It is supposed to register the proper position of the mandible in a verifiable and reproducible way. This study addresses the reproducibility of the CR. Intra-oral graphic recordings were carried out in 15 dental students and the antero-posterior and medio-lateral positions of the point of the tracings were evaluated. The tracings were reproduced within an area 162 +/- 55 microns on sagittal axis and 141 +/- 32 microns on transversal axis. The other aim of the study was to investigate the effects of the graphic and the leaf gauge registrations on the condyle position of an articulator. It was concluded that there were no significant differences in reproducibility between the two methods on sagittal and transversal axes, but on the vertical axis the graphic registration method proved to be significantly more reproducible than the leaf gauge registration.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Immunohistochemical evaluation of HER-2/neu expression in infiltrating breast carcinoma: a study of reproducibility.

OBJECTIVE: To determine interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility in the assessment of the HercepTest- and TAB250-immunostained slides. STUDY DESIGN: Three independent expert pathologists (two with and one without training in HercepTest assessment) evaluated the HercepTest and TAB250-immunostained slides of 108 infiltrating breast carcinomas with a triple-blind method. The evaluation was repeated, with the same method and sequence of view, after 60 days. RESULTS: Expert pathologists, after adequate training in HercepTest evaluation, could reach excellent interobserver (K=.911, P<.001) and intraobserver reproducibility (K of .863-.926; P <.001 for all). The percentage of disagreement in intraobserver reproducibility ranged from 0.9% to 3.7%. Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of TAB250-immunostained slides was good (K = .658, P < .001) and from good to excellent (K of .600-.895, P < .001 for all), respectively. CONCLUSION: Optimization of the level of accuracy in HercepTest evaluation is mandatory because the decision to initiate therapy with Herceptin depends on the result. Moreover, considering that the percentage of disagreement in intraobserver reproducibility ranges from 0.9% to 3.7%, it is advisable that two expert pathologists evaluate all HercepTest slides with a double-blind method. If there are discordant results, they must be discussed by the same pathologists.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

PubMed1999

[Reproducible marginal gap measurements of partial ceramic crowns].

Aim of this research was to test the hypothesis that marginal gap measurements by a digital microscopic image processing computer are reproducible. Light microscopic images of the margins of Artglass partial crowns on stone dies were obtained with a 3CCD color video camera, digitized and processed. Ten measuring points were painted on a 0.5 mm section of the finish line of the preparation. The opposite corresponding measuring points on the margin of the partial crown were painted as well. The distance (marginal gap) between two corresponding points was painted and calculated by the computer. Reproducibility (precision) is reflected in the ability to reproduce the same measurement results in repeated measurements (n = 5). The reproducibility error was expressed as the coefficient of variation (CV) in percent (%). The localization of the corresponding measurement points and the calculation of the marginal gap were performed without errors. For a marginal gap between 15-50 microns the average measurement error was 3% or 0.45-1.5 microns. It was concluded that the measurement of the gap between two points by the digital image processing computer was reproducible. The measurement error was neglectable given that a clinically acceptable marginal gap is 100 microns.

Ceramics↗

PubMed2002

Reproducibility of skin characteristic measurements and reported sun exposure history.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study is to investigate the reproducibility of information on sun exposure, skin characteristics and sunburn collected through a standardized questionnaire used in the multi-centre South European case-control study on skin cancer, 'Helios'. We also intended to use results from reproducibility analysis for correcting odds ratio (OR) estimates from the original study. METHODS: We re-interviewed, with the same questionnaire, a sample of 115 cases of basal cell and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin and 119 population controls, 18-26 months apart, in four centres of Italy, Spain and France. The questionnaire included questions on skin characteristics, sunburns and sun exposure histories. We investigated agreement, studying the association between the difference of the two measures and a set of explanatory variables. According to the results of the reproducibility analysis we corrected OR estimates from the original study simultaneously adjusting for random measurement error. RESULTS: Hair and eye colour showed high agreement with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) of 0.81 and 0.74, respectively. Lifetime sun exposure showed substantial agreement with ICC ranging from 0.68 for time spent doing outdoor work to 0.79 for time spent outdoors during holidays and holidays at the beach. The poorest agreement was found for number of lifetime sunburns (ICC = 0.25), while sunburns during childhood showed a substantial agreement (Cohen's Kappa = 0.67). Lack of reproducibility was mainly associated with subjects' education, while no significant differences were observed between cases and controls. The corrected OR showed a moderate increase with a reinforcement of the effect of sun exposure and skin reaction to sun exposure. CONCLUSION: Overall, there was good reproducibility, particularly in the case of sun exposure histories, between answers given on two different occasions to a questionnaire administered by trained interviewers. However, since measurement error can substantially bias OR toward the null value, it should be taken into account in estimates of the effect of sun exposure on risk of skin cancer.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal thickness measurements by optical coherence tomography.

PURPOSE: To assess the repeatability and interoperator and intersession reproducibility of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements made by a commercially available optical coherence tomography (OCT) system. METHODS: Intersession and interoperator reproducibility and repeatability were defined according to the guidelines of the British Standards Institution and examined in a control group of 14 normal subjects. An in-house computer program was used to evaluate central corneal thickness from these scans. RESULTS: The coefficient of interoperator reproducibility was 0.18%, whereas that for intersession reproducibility was 1.11%. Wilcoxon analysis (5% level of significance) showed that there was no statistically significant difference between scans acquired during different sessions or by different operators. Coefficients of repeatability were all less than 3%. The average CCT was 526 +/- 28 microm (SD) and the range of normal CCT between 5th and 95th percentiles was 498 to 576 microm. CONCLUSIONS: Although the commercially available OCT scanner was designed for retinal imaging, with a few minor modifications, the system may be used to image the anterior segment. Previous studies have shown that OCT measurements correlate well with those from conventional techniques, and it has the added advantage of being a noncontact technique. This study further demonstrates that the OCT measurements show a high degree of repeatability and reproducibility. Thus, OCT is emerging as a promising tool for evaluation of CCT in the clinical setting.

Adult↗