SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Colonoscopy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 433 records · Page 24Linked to original sources

PubMed1986

Colonoscopy findings in symptomatic patients without X-ray evidence of colonic neoplasms.

Colonoscopy was carried out in 97 patients with persistent large-bowel symptoms in whom double-contrast barium enemas were either normal or showed diverticular disease alone. In 37 the X-ray was normal, but colonoscopy showed 9 polyps and 3 carcinomas. In 60 patients with barium enemas showing diverticular disease alone colonoscopy revealed 13 polyps and 1 carcinoma. Of the 4 carcinomas 1 was Dukes' A, 2 Dukes' B, and 1 Dukes' C. 23 of the 26 patients with a neoplastic lesion at colonoscopy had rectal bleeding, compared with only 40 of the 71 without a lesion. The frequency of neoplasia in those with a normal barium enema was 32%, compared with 23% in those whose X-ray showed diverticular disease. Colonoscopy, rather than double-contrast barium enema, should be the first line of investigation in patients with persistent large-bowel symptoms, especially rectal bleeding.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Earlier surveillance colonoscopy programme improves survival in patients with ulcerative colitis associated colorectal cancer: results of a 23-year surveillance programme in the Japanese population.

Patients with long-standing ulcerative colitis (UC) are known to have an increased risk for the development of colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this study was to clarify the cumulative risk for the development of dysplasia or invasive cancer and the effectiveness of surveillance colonoscopy in the Japanese population. A total of 217 patients received a total of 1027 surveillance colonoscopies between January 1979 and December 2001 at the University of Tokyo hospital. Patients with invasive cancer found in the surveillance group were compared to those referred to our hospital from the other hospitals without surveillance colonoscopy. Surveillance colonoscopy confirmed 15 patients with definite dysplasia. Of these, five were proved to have invasive cancer in the resected specimens. The cumulative risk for the development of invasive cancer at 10, 20, and 30 years was 0.5, 4.1, and 6.1%, respectively, while that for the development of definite dysplasia at 10, 20, and 30 years was 3.1, 10.0, and 15.6%, respectively. All the patients with invasive cancer in the surveillance group remained alive, while three out of four patients in the nonsurveillance group died. Our surveillance programme is useful for detecting UC-associated CRC, and survival may be improved by surveillance colonoscopy.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2001

Fecal occult blood and flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer: modeling the impact on colonoscopy requirements and cancer detection rates.

AIM: The aim of this study was to estimate the colonoscopy requirements and the likely impact of fecal occult blood and flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on the detection of colorectal cancer by using previously published data. METHODS: Fecal occult blood and flexible sigmoidoscopy screening programs were applied to the 2.04 million subjects aged 50-65 years, at a participation rate of 40%. The following strategies were evaluated: Fecal occult blood testing with colonoscopy follow up of all positive tests; flexible sigmoidoscopy with colonoscopy follow up of all adenomatous polyps; and flexible sigmoidoscopy with colonoscopy follow up of all adenomatous polyps > 10 mm in size. RESULTS: The fecal occult blood program detected 5.6% of all colorectal cancer cases at a rate of 2,914 colonoscopies/percentage of detection of colorectal cancer. The flexible sigmoidoscopy program detected 14% of all colorectal cancer cases at a rate of 8,160 colonoscopies/percentage of detection of colorectal cancer. The flexible sigmoidoscopy program with follow up of adenomatous polyps > 10 mm in size detected 13% of all colorectal cancer cases at a rate of 1,230 colonoscopies/percentage of detection of colorectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Flexible sigmoidoscopy screening followed by colonoscopic follow up of adenomatous polyps > 10 mm in size is the most efficient screening strategy in terms of colonoscopies generated and cases of colorectal cancer detected.

Adenomatous Polyps↗

PubMed2003

Complication rates of colonoscopy in an Australian teaching hospital environment.

BACKGROUND: Quality assurance is an important part of health-care delivery. With the high level of awareness relating to adverse events from medical care, demonstration of a high standard of practice in gastroenterology is desirable. AIMS: To determine the incidence of significant complications or death within 30 days of an outpatient colonoscopy, and confirm that these are in keeping with international standards. METHODS: A retrospective audit of linked endoscopy and other hospital databases and selected medical records was carried out, based on reports of 30,463 colonoscopies performed between 5 September 1989 and 31 December 1999 in the three Western Australian public teaching hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 23,508 colonoscopies was performed on an outpatient basis between 5 September 1989 and 31 December 1999. Post-procedural complications identified (and incidence) were: bleeding episodes 49 (0.21%), colonic perforation 23 (0.1%), abdominal pain 22 (0.09%), and others 19 (0.08%). A total of 196 patients died within 30 days of undergoing colonoscopy (0.83%), although only three deaths were attributable to the procedure itself (incidence 0.01%). Two were inpatients at the time of the procedure (outpatient mortality rate 0.004%). The combined incidence of bleeding and perforation was not significantly different between consultant endoscopists and unassisted trainees (incidence 0.21% vs 0.20%, P=0.98). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of bleeding and perforation is similar to other reported series and reflects procedures performed by personnel with a wide range of endoscopic experience. The incidence of complications was not greater for trainees compared with consultant endoscopists. All bleeding episodes and the majority of perforations were associated with a therapeutic intervention. Diagnostic colonoscopy in particular is a very safe procedure.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

A novel indicator for surveillance colonoscopy following colorectal cancer resection.

INTRODUCTION: Current surveillance for recurrent intraluminal or metachronous colorectal cancer following resection is largely undertaken by colonoscopic examination of the remaining colon. The burden on colonoscopic services is high and the procedure is expensive. Immunological faecal occult blood testing (FOBT) is a sensitive and specific test for detecting colorectal cancer, and may fine tune the need for timely surveillance colonoscopy. METHODS: Consecutive patients due for surveillance colonoscopy following colonic resection for cancer were prospectively studied. Each patient had a single faecal sample obtained at per rectal examination on a gloved examining finger. This was subjected to immunological FOBT in the clinic, and patients were categorized as FOBT positive or negative, according to the result. Colonoscopy as well as ultrasound or CT of the liver were performed within eight weeks of FOBT. RESULTS: Six hundred and eleven patients had both FOBT and colonoscopy. Fifty-nine (13.6%) were categorized as FOBT-positive. Of these, nine had biopsy-proven recurrent or metachronous cancer, 12 patients had one, or more adenomatous polyps, one patient had radiation proctitis and two patients had pan-colonic mucositis following chemotherapy. In the remaining 552 FOBT-negative patients, no cancers were found. Thirty-eight patients had polyps that were removed. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting cancer by immunological FOBT was 100% sensitivity for detecting adenomatous polyps was 24% but specificity was 93%. CONCLUSION: The immunological faecal occult blood test provides sensitive detection of metachronous and recurrent cancer in postoperative surveillance. Routine application may be used to reduce the frequency of colonoscopic surveillance, as a negative FOBT may be taken as a sign that colonoscopy may be deferred safely.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

5-year incidence of adenomas after negative colonoscopy in asymptomatic average-risk persons [see comment].

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening will be maximized by selecting the widest screening intervals that effectively prevent cancer mortality. However, data on the incidence of neoplasia in persons with no abnormal findings on initial examination are limited. The aim of this study was to describe the incidence of colonic neoplasia 5 years after negative screening colonoscopy in asymptomatic average-risk persons. METHODS: We previously reported the results of screening colonoscopy in 496 asymptomatic average-risk persons, 368 of whom had no neoplasia identified. Colonoscopy to the cecum was performed in 154 of these persons at a mean of 66 months after the initial negative colonoscopy. RESULTS: Forty-one (27%) had at least one adenoma, but only 1 person had an adenoma > or = 1 cm and none had cancer, severe dysplasia, or villous or tubulovillous histology. Hyperplastic polyps at the initial examination did not predict incident adenomas. Regular nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use was associated with a decreased rate of incident adenomas. CONCLUSIONS: In average-risk persons, the interval between screening examinations can be safely expanded beyond 5 years, provided the initial examination is a carefully performed complete colonoscopy that is negative for colonic adenomas or cancer.

Adenoma↗

PubMed2003

Screening for colorectal cancer in Chinese: comparison of fecal occult blood test, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), and colonoscopy are the most commonly recommended screening tests for colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy and safety of these 3 screening procedures in a general population of ethnic Chinese. METHODS: Asymptomatic adults older than 50 years were recruited from the general public through health exhibitions. All enrolled subjects were offered FOBT and full colonoscopy under sedation. Advanced colonic lesions (defined as adenoma > or = 10 mm, villous adenoma, adenoma with moderate or severe dysplasia, or invasive cancer) were recorded. Lesions at the distal 40 cm in the left colon and rectum were taken as findings of FS. RESULTS: A total of 505 subjects (56% women; mean age +/- SD, 56.5 +/- 5.4 years) were enrolled, and 476 (94.3%) had a complete colonoscopy. Advanced colonic neoplasms were documented in 63 subjects (12.5%), of which 45 had lesions in the distal colon and 26 in the proximal colon. Among the 385 subjects with a normal distal colon, 14 (3.6%) had advanced lesions in the proximal colon that would be missed by FS alone. The sensitivity and specificity of FOBT for advanced colonic lesions were 14.3% and 79.2% and the sensitivity and specificity of FS were 77.8% and 83.9%, respectively. Combining FOBT with FS would not significantly improve the results of FS alone. Among these 505 subjects who underwent colonoscopy and 148 who underwent polypectomy, there was no perforation and only one occurrence of postpolypectomy bleeding recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy is a safe and accurate method for the screening of colorectal neoplasms in Chinese subjects.

Aged↗

PubMed1999

Prospective analysis of complications 30 days after outpatient colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to (1) determine whether more complications are reported by patients 30 days after outpatient colonoscopy than are discussed at our monthly morbidity and mortality conferences, (2) identify complications resulting in visits to the emergency department or physician's office or leading to hospitalization, and (3) assess which factors put patients at highest risk. A secondary goal was to determine the rate of work lost after outpatient colonoscopy. METHODS: Trained interviewers performed standardized telephone interviews of consecutive outpatients undergoing colonoscopy at Georgetown University Hospital over a 1-year period. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred ninety-six patients were contacted 30 days after outpatient colonoscopy and participated in our study. Twenty patients had complications that required a visit to an emergency department or physician. Ninety percent of these cases (18) were detected at 30 days, but 15% (3) were discussed at morbidity and mortality conferences. All seven complications that necessitated hospitalization were identified at 30 days, but only two were discussed at our morbidity and mortality conference. The most common complications reported by patients were abdominal discomfort (5.4%) and rectal bleeding (2.1%). CONCLUSION: More complications are detected by means of contacting patients 30 days after outpatient colonoscopy than are discussed at our morbidity and mortality conferences.

Abdominal Pain↗

PubMed2002

Patient pain during colonoscopy: an analysis using real-time magnetic endoscope imaging.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Colonoscopy is generally perceived as being a painful procedure. Contributory factors are: stretching of the colonic wall and mesenteric attachments from looping of the instrument shaft, overinsufflation, the degree of torque or force applied to the colonoscope shaft, and patient pain threshold. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of pain episodes experienced during diagnostic colonoscopy and the corresponding colonoscope configuration, utilizing real-time magnetic endoscope imaging (MEI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive outpatients undergoing colonoscopy were studied. Patients with previous colonic resections were excluded. Procedures were commenced with antispasmodics only, and patient sedation was self-administered whenever significant discomfort was experienced, using a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) syringe pump. All "demands" were correlated with the MEI record, which was subsequently analysed. RESULTS: A total of 650 demands were recorded in 102 patients. Seventy-seven percent of all demands occurred with the colonoscope tip in the sigmoid colon, 7 % in the descending colon, 6 % at the splenic flexure, 5 % in the transverse colon, and 4 % in the proximal colon. Ninety percent of all pain episodes coincided with either looping (79 %) or straightening of the colonoscope shaft (11 %); presumed overinsufflation being an infrequent cause of pain (9 %). Of the loops encountered during colonoscopy, the N-sigmoid spiral loop was associated with the majority of pain episodes (56 %). Looping was both more frequent ( P = 0.0002) and less well tolerated in women than in men ( P = 0.0140). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to document pain at colonoscopy accurately. Looping, particularly in the variable anatomy of the sigmoid colon, is the major cause of pain, especially in women. Use of MEI may improve pain control by facilitating the straightening of loops within the sigmoid colon, and by enabling the endoscopist to target patient analgesia.

Analgesics↗

PubMed2003

A randomized, blinded, prospective trial to compare the safety and efficacy of three bowel-cleansing solutions for colonoscopy (HSG-01*).

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: There are conflicting data regarding the optimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy. This study was carried out to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of three widely used bowel lavage solutions: the standard polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution based on the GoLytely formulation (PEG-EL1; Klean-Prep); a sulphate-free PEG-EL solution based on the NuLytely formulation (PEG-EL2, Endofalk); and a sodium phosphate preparation (NaP, Fleet Phospho-Soda). PATIENT AND METHODS: A total of 185 consecutive patients scheduled for elective colonoscopy were prospectively randomly assigned to undergo pre-colonoscopic bowel cleansing with either 4 l of PEG-EL1 (n=64), 3 l of PEG-EL2 (n=59), or 90 ml of NaP (n=62). The quality of preparatory colonic cleansing for each segment from the rectum to the ascending colon was scored on a five-level rating scale (1, very good to 5, very poor) by endoscopists who were blinded with regard to the type of preparation used. The primary outcome measure for the comparison of treatments was the "worst" score in any of the rated bowel segments. Safety and tolerability were evaluated by means of a symptom questionnaire completed by each patient immediately before the procedure. RESULTS: Of the 185 patients who were randomly assigned to one of the three treatments, 175 underwent colonoscopy and 173 were evaluable with regard to efficacy - 59, 54, and 60 patients treated with PEG-EL1, PEG-EL2, and NaP, respectively. The treatment groups were comparable with regard to the baseline characteristics. PEG-EL1 was statistically significantly superior to the other treatments in relation to the "worst cleansing" score ( P</=0.003). In addition, colonoscopic visualization was markedly better in each of the five bowel segments and general "very good" or "good" ratings were achieved in more than 90 % of patients treated with PEG-EL1. The percentages were consistently lower in the other two groups, particularly in the ascending colon. With the exception of the sigmoid, the differences in all segments of the large bowel were statistically significant (P</=0.04). Patient satisfaction was comparable between the treatment groups. Adverse events (mainly nausea/vomiting and abdominal pain) and deviations in laboratory values occurred more frequently in the NaP group. CONCLUSIONS: Preparatory PEG-EL1 (Klean-Prep) was significantly superior to PEG-EL2 (Endofalk) and NaP (Fleet Phospho-Soda) in achieving effective cleansing of the entire colon prior to colonoscopy. On the basis of these data, PEG-EL1 can be regarded as the "gold standard" for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Safety of nonanesthetist sedation with propofol for outpatient colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: In our endoscopy service, nonanesthetists administered propofol sedation has been used in more than 8000 procedures during the past 3 years. This study prospectively assessed the safety of propofol sedation in outpatient colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 300 consecutive outpatients (mean age 53, range 14-94) were enrolled in the study (139 colonoscopies, 161 EGDs). After an initial dose of 0.5 mg/kg (ASA I-II and age </=70) or 0.25 mg/kg (ASA >III or age >70 years), propofol was titrated in 10 mg boluses to a steady state of sedation by the endoscopy nurse under the endoscopist's supervision. Colonoscopy patients also received 25 mg pethidine (meperidine) and 20 mg butylscopolamine, whereas EGDs were performed with propofol sedation alone, without topical pharyngeal anesthesia. In addition to standard monitoring with pulse oximetry and automated sphygmomanometry, patients were also observed with sidestream capnography or measurement of electrocardiographic impedance changes, providing real-time graphic assessment of respiratory activity. All patients were given oxygen 2 L/min by nasal cannula during the entire procedure. RESULTS: Mean dosages of 157 mg (range 70-340) and 180 mg (60-400) propofol were administered for colonoscopy and EGD procedures, respectively. No episodes of apnea occurred. The oxygen saturation fell below 90 % for short periods of time in 11 patients (3.7 %). Three patients required a temporary increase in oxygen delivery. No assisted ventilation was necessary. In 22 patients (7.3 %), the mean blood pressure temporarily decreased below 50 mmHg. Two patients received a 500-ml infusion of normal saline. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol can be safely administered for sedation during colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy by nonanesthetists who are familiar with the pharmacological properties and use of this drug.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

[A 67-year-old patient with diarrhoea and constipation without any pathological findings in virtual colonoscopy].

Virtual colonoscopy provides a computer-simulated endoluminal perspective of the air-filled, distended colon using modern CT scanning (spiral CT). According to recent studies the sensitivity and specificity of this technique are high for adenomatous polyps > or = 10 mm. A 67-year-old patient was admitted to our hospital because of diarrhoea and constipation, associated with abdominal pain in the lower right abdomen. Prior to admission the patient had undergone virtual colonoscopy in a specialised radiological practice which had detected no abnormalities apart from colonic diverticulosis. However, conventional video-colonoscopy revealed a subtotal circular malignant stenosis in the region of the right colonic flexure. A poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma was diagnosed histologically. Staging showed peritoneal carcinosis with infiltration of the right ureter and lymphangiosis carcinomatosa of the pectoral lobe of the left lung. After right hemicolectomy because of metastasised carcinoma of the ascending colon (pT4pN1pM1) we started palliative chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin. The risk of misdiagnosis by virtual colonoscopy is clearly increased in patients with subtotal tumour stenosis of the ascending colon. Conventional video-colonoscopy remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2006

Improvement in colonoscopy performance with adjunctive magnetic endoscope imaging: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Although magnetic endoscope imaging (MEI) has been reported to improve the performance of colonoscopy, so far only a few randomized controlled studies have been published supporting its adjunctive role. This randomized study was designed to evaluate the role of MEI on the overall performance of colonoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients admitted for elective colonoscopy were recruited. They were randomly allocated into two groups, either with an MEI view (study group) or without (control group). Examinations were performed by one of the two designated, trained endoscopists. The primary end point was intubation time. Other outcome measures included completion rate, pain score graded by patients, and ease of procedure as reflected by the number of attempts at straightening the scope, the number of times of hand pressure was applied abdominally, and the need to change the patient's position. Endoscopists were also asked to score the ease of procedure. Finally, in the MEI group, endoscopists were asked to comment on whether MEI helped to locate colonic lesions during endoscopy. RESULTS: In a 12-month period, 120 patients were recruited, with 60 patients in each group. The two groups were matched for age, gender distribution, and indications for colonoscopy. No complication occurred in either group. No significant difference was observed in the intubation time and colonoscopy completion rate. Other measures of ease of procedure and pain score were also similar. However, MEI was reported by endoscopists to be helpful in locating colonic lesions in 32 % of examinations with positive findings. CONCLUSION: For trained endoscopists, the device confers no benefit in terms of performance improvement. The only identified benefit is in locating lesions. Thus, while the routine use of MEI cannot be recommended, the device could be selectively offered to patients for follow-up examination after local treatment, or to patients with small colorectal tumors in whom laparoscopic surgery is planned.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Improved colonoscopy success rate with a distally attached mucosectomy cap.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Although colonoscopy is a well-established procedure, various technical difficulties may cause failure. This report describes experience with cap-assisted colonoscopy (CAC), a technique in which a mucosectomy cap is attached to the end of colonoscope in order to improve the success rate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2003 to May 2005, CAC was used in consecutive patients with difficult colonoscopy procedures, which were defined firstly as failure to pass through the sigmoid colon after 20 min of examination, or secondly as failure to reach the cecum at the end of the procedure. Patients with prior colonic surgery, poor bowel preparation, distal colonic stricture, or obstructing tumors were excluded. The results with the CAC method were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients met the criteria for difficult colonoscopy during the study period. When CAC was used to repeat the procedure, cecal and terminal ileal intubation could then be achieved in 94 and 70 patients, respectively. In the remaining six patients in whom cecal intubation failed, one failure was due to a tumor obstruction at the splenic flexure. CONCLUSIONS: CAC can be used as a rescue method to improve the success rate of colonoscopy when failure is encountered.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

[Patient acceptance of magnetic resonance colonography: a prospective inquiry for comparison to conventional colonoscopy].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Precondition for establishment of magnetic resonance colonography (MRCG) as a diagnostic tool in secondary prevention of colorectal cancer is not only high diagnostic accuracy but also a good acceptance amongst patients. The aim of this study was to compare post-examination appraisal of patients for MRCG to that of bowel preparation and conventional colonoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 88 patients (24 women, 64 men, mean age 67 +- 17,3 years) were interviewed by a standardized questionnaire regarding pain/discomfort (scale from 1 to 10), overall assessment of difficulties and preference for future tests. After bowel cleansing, MRCG and conventional colonoscopy were performed on the same day. Bowel cleansing consisted of drinking about 5 liters of a polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution. For MRCG the colon was filled with ca. 2000 ml of tap water. Imaging was performed with a 1.5T MR scanner in the prone position. RESULTS: Most unpleasant for the patients was the preceding bowel preparation (70%), followed by colonoscopy (14%) and MRCG (8%). The preferred method was MRCG (58%) followed by colonoscopy (20,5%). The most unpleasant symptoms named by patients were the amount of oral electrolyte solution that had to be drunk (34%), abdominal pressure (25%), nausea (24%) because of bowel preparation, body positioning (25%) and rectal tube (13%) during MRCG, abdominal pressure (19%) and pain (18%) during colonoscopy. CONCLUSION: Patients' acceptance of MRCG indicates that it has a potential role as an additional diagnostic tool in secondary prevention of colorectal cancer.

Aged↗

PubMed1998

Acute colitis following colonoscopy.

Colitis following colonoscopy is an acute, self-limited condition characterized by tenesmus and bloody diarrhea appearing within 48 hours of colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy. Glutaraldehyde used for disinfection of the endoscopes is considered to be the main etiological agent. Three cases of severe acute self-limited colitis are described in this report. All three were observed within one week, and showed the typical anamnestic, clinical, endoscopic, histological, and radiological features of glutaraldehyde-induced colitis. The main characteristics in these cases were the time relationship with colonoscopy and the severity of the clinical presentation, with symptoms of systemic reaction and intense and diffuse edema of the colonic mucosa. The clinical and morphological features may mimic those of colonic ischemia. All three patients recovered completely within a few days, one spontaneously and two after treatment with steroids, antibiotics, and mesalazine. Acute colitis following colonoscopy should be regarded as one of the complications related to colonoscopy, and it should be taken into account in the differential diagnosis of acute colitis.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1998

Patient-controlled sedation and analgesia, using propofol and alfentanil, during colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Patient-controlled sedation (PCS) enables titration of dosage to an individual's requirements and is potentially useful in colonoscopy. The aim was to compare the value of patient-controlled sedation, using propofol and alfentanil, with that of intravenous diazemuls and pethidine during colonoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Following randomization, 66 patients undergoing colonoscopy received either an intravenous bolus of pethidine (50 mg) and diazemuls (10-20 mg) prior to colonoscopy or were connected to an infusion pump containing propofol (10 mg/ml) and alfentanil (25 microg/ml). Patients self-administered 0.5 ml boluses as often as they required. Pain and sedation score were recorded by a nurse specialist and on a patient questionnaire. An anaesthetist was present throughout the procedure. RESULTS: PCS provided lighter sedation (median sedation score, 3 versus 4; P=0.0001), less analgesia (median pain score, 1 versus 0; P=0.004), a smaller maximum fall in systolic blood pressure (23 mmHg versus 33 mmHg; P=0.02) and a faster recovery time (median 10 min versus 40 min; P=0.0001), irrespective of the dose administered, compared with a diazemuls-pethidine combination. The duration of the procedure was unaffected. All patients were satisfied with their level of sedation. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-controlled sedation is an effective alternative to premedication with narcotic/benzodiazepine combinations during colonoscopy.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Immediate recovery of psychomotor function after patient-administered nitrous oxide/oxygen inhalation for colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Previous studies have shown that patients inhaling-self-administered nitrous oxide/oxygen as a sedative/analgesic medication for colonoscopy were ready to leave the endoscopy unit on average sooner than those given conventional intravenous premedication. The aim of this study was to define the time course of recovery after nitrous oxide/oxygen sedation or intravenous opiate/benzodiazepine premedication for colonoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive colonoscopy patients were randomized to receive either a 50% nitrous oxide/oxygen mixture (n = 12), or pethidine 25-50 mg and midazolam 2.5 mg (n = 15), or no sedation (n = 10). Psychomotor function was assessed by multiple-choice reaction time, hand-eye co-ordination, and letter deletion tests before and at 15-minute intervals after colonoscopy, with the assessment carried out by an observer blinded to the sedation regime. RESULTS: The mean duration and tolerance of the procedure were similar in the three study groups. Patients receiving nitrous oxide/oxygen mixture were judged (by clinical observation) to recover more quickly than those given conventional sedation (median 8 min, range 3- 25 min, vs. median 16 min, range 3-50 min). Recovery, as judged by a return to baseline in psychomotor function tests, was complete within 30 minutes in all patients receiving the nitrous oxide/oxygen mixture, compared to 50 minutes in those given conventional intravenous sedation. CONCLUSIONS: The rapid recovery observed with nitrous oxide/oxygen sedation for colonoscopy suggests that it is safe for patients to travel unescorted after the procedure. Driving may also be safe soon after nitrous oxide/oxygen sedation, but this requires further clarification.

Analgesia, Patient-Controlled↗