PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Duplicate Publications as Topic”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 433 records · Page 24Linked to original sources
PubMed1993

Ethical issues in conducting clinical nursing research.

It frequently is assumed that research is being conducted in an ethical manner. Although this usually is the case, the approaches used to assure an ethical approach are not explicitly described in research proposals, protocols, presentations, or manuscripts. This paper explicates the ethical issues related to conducting clinical nursing research. Ethical principles and the problems of scientific misconduct are presented. Rights of human subjects and rights of special subjects are discussed, and practical points about the conduct of ethical research are summarized.

Animal Welfare↗
PubMed1993

Correction.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Duplicate Publications as Topic↗
PubMed1993

Publication policies.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Duplicate Publications as Topic↗
PubMed1993

[Duplicate publication of original manuscripts in and from the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde].

OBJECTIVE: To determine the numbers of correct (meeting the Vancouver rules) and incorrect duplicate publications of original articles (OA) in the Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. DESIGN: Retrospective bibliometric study followed by interviews. SETTING: The journal's editorial office. METHOD: Of the first and second author of 172 OA (all 95 OA from the first half of 1990 and all 77 OA from the first half of 1992) all biomedical publications of the same purport published in 1990-1992 were looked up. Subsequently the authors were approached by telephone to find out the background of these duplicate publications. RESULTS: Of 2 OA the corresponding articles were not found. Of the remaining 94 OA from the first half of 1990, II (12%) proved to have been published again without this fact being mentioned in a footnote as required by the rules (for which omission the journals were responsible in 4 and the authors in 7 cases). Of the remaining 76 OA from the first half of 1992, 12 were found to have been published previously, 5 in accordance with and 7 (9%) against the rules. Duplicate publication against the rules was to be attributed to incorrect interpretation of the Vancouver rules by the authors. CONCLUSION: Of the OA in the Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd a minimum of 14% are or have already been published elsewhere, 11% without this fact being stated as required by the Vancouver rules.

Bibliometrics↗