PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Meropenem”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 433 records · Page 24Linked to original sources

A study of the penetration of meropenem into bile using endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.

One gram of meropenem was administered as prophylaxis to patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) in a study of the bile pharmacokinetics of this agent. Twenty-four patients were evaluated and a single bile sample was collected from each one during ERC at different time intervals following intravenous infusion. Bile concentrations after the dose ranged from 0.7 to 25.7 mg/L (mean 11.1) and exceeded the MIC90s for the pathogens most commonly associated with biliary tract infections for up to 203 mins. The bile concentrations of 13 patients with biliary tree obstruction were compared with those of 11 patients without obstruction. Bile concentrations in excess of the MIC90s for the predominant pathogens were achieved in both groups; a positive correlation between meropenem bile concentration and the time of dose administration was demonstrable only for the obstructed group. ERC may be a useful technique for biliary pharmacokinetic studies.

Adult↗

Biochemical comparison of imipenem, meropenem and biapenem: permeability, binding to penicillin-binding proteins, and stability to hydrolysis by beta-lactamases.

Biological activities of biapenem, imipenem, and meropenem were compared with respect to permeability into Gram-negative bacteria, binding to penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), and hydrolysis by beta-lactamases. Permeability for the three carbapenems was similar when measured in Serratia marcescens S6 producing a carbapenem-hydrolyzing beta-lactamase. Penetration of the carbapenems was comparable with cephaloridine and faster than piperacillin or the extended spectrum cephalosporin cefotaxime. All the carbapenems bound most strongly to PBP 2 of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and to PBP 1 of Staphylococcus aureus. In addition, biapenem showed strong affinity with PBP 1a of E. coli and PBP 1b of P. aeruginosa. Selected serine beta-lactamases, including the extended spectrum plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases, hydrolyzed these carbapenems at rates < 0.1% that of cephaloridine. Metallo-beta-lactamases hydrolysed the carbapenems at measurable rates, with enzymes from Bacteroides fragilis and Xanthomonas maltophilia hydrolyzing biapenem at lower Vmax values than meropenem or imipenem. In conclusion, all the carbapenems exhibited good rates of penetration, bound strongly to PBPs in both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, and were stable to most Group 1 and Group 2 serine beta-lactamases, but were hydrolyzed by metallo-beta-lactamases.

Bacteria↗

In-vitro interactions of DX-8739, a new carbapenem, meropenem and imipenem with amikacin against multiresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

In order to investigate the antimicrobial interactions against multiresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, thirty-seven strains resistant to antimicrobial agents of five different chemical classes were exposed in vitro to the combination of three carbapenems. DX-8739, a novel DHP-I stable analogue, meropenem and imipenem with amikacin. The tested combinations expressed an enhanced killing activity against 38-46% of strains and an additive effect against 5-13%. These effects were the same whether the applied carbapenem was DX-8739, meropenem or imipenem; they were also independent of the MIC of any antimicrobial.

Amikacin↗

Bactericidal activity, post antibiotic effect and modified controlled effective regrowth time of meropenem at high concentrations.

The effect of increasing meropenem concentrations up to 250 mg/L, as might occur if 3 g was given as a single daily intravenous dose, was investigated in terms of bactericidal activity, post antibiotic effect (PAE) and modified controlled effective regrowth time (mCERT). Increasing the meropenem concentration above 50 mg/L did not result in increased bacterial killing, while concentrations over 75 mg/L did not result in longer PAE or mCERT.

Enterobacter↗

Killing kinetics of meropenem against penicillin-resistant pneumococci.

The killing kinetics of meropenem against sixteen clinical isolates of pneumococci (12 penicillin-resistant, three penicillin-intermediate and one penicillin-sensitive) were studied. Meropenem was tested at 1x, 2x and 4x the MIC for each individual isolate. The results showed a good bactericidal activity with rapid killing of pneumococci (killing > 3 log10 cfu/mL was obtained for nine strains). This strategy needs clinical assessment and might prove to be a suitable alternative to penicillin and cephalosporins for the treatment of mixed infections involving multiresistant pneumococci.

Meropenem↗

Meropenem-induced alteration of the susceptibility of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus to the bactericidal activity of human polymorphonuclear leucocytes.

The analysis of the interaction between antimicrobials and phagocytosis in vitro provides information additional to standard MIC and MBC estimations in predicting in-vivo efficacy. This study investigated the effects of meropenem, a newly available carbapenem, on the activities of human neutrophils against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. The results were compared with those obtained with imipenem. Pretreatment of E. coli and S. aureus with meropenem and imipenem sensitized the bacteria to leucocytic killing. In the presence of antibiotics, opsonophagocytic killing of E. coli, but not S. aureus, was synergistically enhanced.

Blood Bactericidal Activity↗

In vitro activity of meropenem, imipenem, cefepime and ceftazidime against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients.

We studied 67 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients, and compared their in vitro susceptibility to two carbapenems (meropenem and imipenem) and two cephalosporins (cefepime and ceftazidime). The carbapenems were more effective in vitro than the cephalosporins: 92.5% of isolates were susceptible to the former and 77.6% to the latter. Essentially no difference was found between meropenem and imipenem. More discrepancies were seen between cefepime and ceftazidime: four of 67 isolates (6.0%) were more susceptible to cefepime than to ceftazidime, while eight (11. 9%) were more susceptible to ceftazidime than to cefepime.

Carbapenems↗

In vitro activity of gatifloxacin alone and in combination with cefepime, meropenem, piperacillin and gentamicin against multidrug-resistant organisms.

OBJECTIVES: To study the in vitro interaction of gatifloxacin in combination with gentamicin and with the beta-lactams cefepime, meropenem and piperacillin against clinical isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Burkholderia cepacia, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). METHODS: The activity of each drug alone was determined by an agar dilution method. Chequerboard synergy testing was then performed against all the isolates. Time-kill assays were done on selected isolates to assess correlation with the chequerboard results. RESULTS: Synergy was demonstrated with the following combinations at achievable serum concentrations: gatifloxacin/piperacillin for 80% and gatifloxacin/cefepime for 60% of S. maltophilia; gatifloxacin/gentamicin for 60%, and gatifloxacin/cefepime for 50% of ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae, and in all drug combinations for 50-70% of P. aeruginosa. Indifference was noted for the majority of B. cepacia and VRE isolates. Antagonism at therapeutic serum levels was observed with gatifloxacin/piperacillin against a single isolate of B. cepacia. No distinct trend in drug interaction was seen with the different drug combinations against MRSA. Time-kill analyses against selected isolates confirmed the synergic activity of the following drug combinations seen in the chequerboard assays: gatifloxacin/cefepime and gatifloxacin/piperacillin against P. aeruginosa, gatifloxacin/gentamicin against B. cepacia, and gatifloxacin/gentamicin and gatifloxacin/meropenem against ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae. CONCLUSIONS: Gatifloxacin was synergic with the beta-lactams piperacillin, cefepime and meropenem, and with gentamicin against some drug-resistant pathogens. Some of the time-kill analyses against P. aeruginosa, B. cepacia and ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae were in accordance with chequerboard results. Time-kill analyses against S. maltophilia did not confirm the synergy seen in chequerboard testing.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Morphological changes induced by imipenem and meropenem at sub-inhibitory concentrations in Acinetobacter baumannii.

Abstract Sub-inhibitory concentrations of imipenem and meropenem were evaluated for their ability to induce morphological changes with six strains of Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from patients with nosocomial pneumonia. Three strains were susceptible and three were resistant to carbapenems. The strains were grown in the presence of 0 (controls), 0.25x, 0.5x and 1x the MIC of both carbapenems for 4 h, and then examined after Gram's stain. Cells > or = 3 microm in size (spheroplasts) were considered to be altered. Both carbapenems induced significant numbers of spheroplasts compared to controls. Imipenem had more effect against susceptible strains, while meropenem had a greater effect against resistant strains.

Acinetobacter baumannii↗

Activity of meropenem against antibiotic-resistant or infrequently encountered gram-negative bacilli.

Meropenem was compared in vitro with imipenem as well as with several other contemporary beta-lactams, ciprofloxacin, and gentamicin against a group of highly antibiotic resistant members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and a collection of oxidase-positive and/or glucose-nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli. In this study, meropenem was more active than imipenem against isolates of Enterobacter, Klebsiella, Morganella, Providencia, Alcaligenes, Aeromonas, and Pasteurella.

Drug Resistance, Microbial↗

Imipenem- and meropenem-resistant mutants of Enterobacter cloacae and Proteus rettgeri lack porins.

Carbapenems such as imipenem and meropenem are not rapidly hydrolyzed by commonly occurring beta-lactamases. Nevertheless, it was possible, by mutagenesis and selection, to isolate mutant strains of Enterobacter cloacae and Proteus rettgeri that are highly resistant to meropenem and imipenem. Two alterations were noted in the E. cloacae mutants. First, the mutant strains appeared to be strongly derepressed in the production of beta-lactamases, which reached a very high level when the strains were grown in the presence of imipenem. Second, these mutants were deficient in the production of nonspecific porins, as judged by the pattern of outer membrane proteins as well as by reconstitution assays of permeability. As with most porin-deficient mutants, their cultures were unstable, and their cultivation in the absence of carbapenems rapidly led to an overgrowth of porin-producing revertants. Analysis of the data suggests that the synergism between the lowered outer membrane permeability and the slow but significant hydrolysis of carbapenems by the overproduced enzymes can explain the resistance phenotypes quantitatively, although the possibility of alteration of the target cannot be excluded at present. With P. rettgeri mutants, there was no indication of further derepression of beta-lactamase, but the enzyme hydrolyzed imipenem much more efficiently than the E. cloacae enzyme did. In addition, the major porin was absent in one mutant strain. These results suggest that a major factor for the carbapenem resistance of these enteric bacteria is the porin deficiency, and this conclusion forms a contrast to the situation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, in which the most prevalent class of imipenem-resistant mutants appears to lack the specific channel protein D2 yet retains the major nonspecific porin F.

Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins↗

Development of experimental pneumonia by infection with penicillin-insensitive Streptococcus pneumoniae in guinea pigs and their treatment with amoxicillin, cefotaxime, and meropenem.

Acute respiratory infection with penicillin-insensitive Streptococcus pneumoniae (MIC and MBC, 1 and 2 micrograms/ml, respectively) was established in guinea pigs. Intratracheal instillation of 0.5 ml of an overnight culture of S. pneumoniae concentrated 25 times (approximately 3 x 10(9) CFU) induced a bacteremic and fatal pneumonia in > 85% of untreated animals within 46 h, with a mean +/- standard deviation bacterial count of 8.83 +/- 1.11 log10 CFU in lung homogenates. This model was used to evaluate the efficacies of two doses each of amoxicillin, cefotaxime, and meropenem given 1 h after bacterial inoculation. The antibiotics were given at 8-h intervals for up to a total of four injections. The dose of 50 mg of any antibiotic per kg of body weight gave 66.6% survival, compared with 5.05% survival for untreated control animals (P < 0.001). A dose of 200 mg/kg gave a survival rate of 77.8% for meropenem and 83.3% for amoxicillin and cefotaxime, while survival for untreated controls was 11.1% (P < 0.001). Although antibiotic treatment decreased mortality compared with that in untreated controls, the antibiotics contributed to a high early (less than 9 h after bacterial inoculation) mortality, being 53.5% compared with only 6.06% for the untreated controls (P < 0.001). Quantitative cultures of the lungs of animals that died during the 46-h observation period or that were killed after this time showed a significant reduction in the numbers of organisms among treated animals compared with numbers among the control animals (P < 0.001). The described model is an appropriate system for evaluating antibiotic efficacy in invasive pulmonary infection caused by penicillin-insensitive S. pneumoniae.

Amoxicillin↗

In vitro susceptibilities of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis to four fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin, d-ofloxacin, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin), cefpirome, and meropenem.

The in vitro activities of levofloxacin, ofloxacin, d-ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, cefpirome, and meropenem against 34 clinical isolates each of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis were determined by agar dilution on Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 5% horse blood. Levofloxacin was as active as ciprofloxacin against both species (MIC, 0.06 microgram/ml) and more active than ofloxacin and d-ofloxacin. Cefpirome was more active against B. pertussis (MIC, 1.0 microgram/ml) than against B. parapertussis (MIC, > 2 micrograms/ml), while the reverse was true for meropenem (MIC, 2.0 micrograms/ml against B. pertussis and 1.0 microgram/ml against B. parapertussis).

Anti-Infective Agents↗

Determination of activities of levofloxacin, alone and combined with gentamicin, ceftazidime, cefpirome, and meropenem, against 124 strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by checkerboard and time-kill methodology.

A total of 124 Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains were tested for synergy between levofloxacin and cefpirome, ceftazidime, gentamicin, and meropenem. Checkerboards yielded synergistic fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) indices (< or =0.5) with 25 of 496 possible combinations. All other FIC indices were >0.5 to 2 (additive or indifferent), with no antagonism. Time-kill studies with 12 strains showed that levofloxacin (0.06 to 0.5 microg/ml) was synergistic with cefpirome, ceftazidime, gentamicin, and meropenem in 10, 9, 4, and 11 strains, respectively.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Pharmacokinetics of meropenem in critically ill patients with acute renal failure treated by continuous hemodiafiltration.

The pharmacokinetics of meropenem were studied in nine anuric critically ill patients treated by continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration. Peak levels after infusion of 1,000 mg over 30 min amounted to 103.2 +/- 45.9 microgram/ml, and trough levels at 12 h were 9.6 +/- 3.8 microgram/ml. A dosage of 1,000 mg of meropenem twice a day provides plasma drug levels covering intermediately susceptible microorganisms. Further reductions of the dosage might be appropriate for highly susceptible bacteria or when renal replacement therapies with lower clearances are applied.

Acute Kidney Injury↗

Penetration of meropenem in lung, bronchial mucosa, and pleural tissues.

Lung, bronchial mucosa, and pleural tissue samples were obtained from 14 patients undergoing lung surgery 1 to 5 h after administration of 1 g of meropenem. The mean (range) peak concentrations of meropenem were 3.9 (0.2 to 8.2), 6.6 (3.0 to 13.3), and 2.8 (0.6 to 7.8) mg/kg of tissue, respectively, exceeding the MICs at which 90% of isolates are inhibited for most respiratory pathogens.

Adult↗

Postantibiotic leukocyte enhancement of meropenem against gram-positive and gram-negative strains.

The postantibiotic leukocyte enhancement (PALE) of meropenem in vitro in comparison with that of imipenem was evaluated with 24 recently isolated gram-positive and gram-negative strains. In general, pre-exposure to carbapenems (at four times the MIC for 2 h) led to increased polymorphonuclear cell phagocytic killing. The PALE of imipenem was generally significantly less than that observed with meropenem.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Comparison of the susceptibilities of Burkholderia pseudomallei to meropenem and ceftazidime by conventional and intracellular methods.

The effect of the two antibiotics ceftazidime and meropenem on a collection of 46 Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates representing clinical and environmental sources across northern Australia was investigated by using a series of in vitro test methods. The susceptibility testing methods used included Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion, Etest MIC, broth microdilution MIC, and a modification of the microdilution method in which Acanthamoeba cells were added to simulate the effect of a professional phagocytic cell on test outcome. In a semiquantitative validation coculture series, the majority of bacteria were intracellular up to a multiplicity of infection of 10 bacteria to one ameba. The optical density and bacterial count (log10 CFU/ml) correlated across the range tested (r2 = 0.77; P < 0.0001). Susceptibility test results were compared against clinical outcomes. The MICs of ceftazidime were consistently higher than those of meropenem by all three methods. The MICs of both agents were significantly higher when Acanthamoeba trophozoites were added to the broth microdilution method. Conventional and intracellular MIC results were consistent for clinical isolates from the Western Australian outbreak cluster despite the wide variety of clinical outcomes. Further development of the intracellular MIC method is expected to help assess the efficacy of antimicrobial agents on this bacterial species in an intracellular setting.

Acanthamoeba↗