SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Neoadjuvant therapy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 433 records · Page 24Linked to original sources

PubMed2005

Radiologic assessment of rectosigmoid cancer before and after neoadjuvant radiation therapy: comparison between quantitation techniques.

OBJECTIVE: Volumetric analysis was compared with conventional unidimensional measurements for follow-up of rectosigmoid cancer before and after radiation therapy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with rectosigmoid cancer underwent helical CT before and after neoadjuvant radiation therapy. The helical CT examination was performed after colon distention with air and IV administration of an antiperistaltic drug. Two scans were obtained: one with the patient in the supine position and the other with the patient in the prone position after contrast medium injection. The maximal wall thickness and the volumetric analysis of the tumor were obtained through manual segmentation. RESULTS: The mean of the differences between the volumetric analysis of the scans obtained before and after radiation therapy was 8.3 +/- 10.3 (SD) mL (-22.7%) (p <0.05). The mean of the differences between the maximal wall thickness of the pre- and post-radiation therapy scans was 3.4 +/- 2.6 mm (-19.1%) (p <0.05). A significant difference was observed between the variation of the maximal wall thickness and the variation of volumetric analysis in pre- and post-radiation therapy scans (p <0.05). The patients could be classified in different response categories depending on the measurement method and on the response criteria. CONCLUSION: Volumetric analysis of rectosigmoid cancer is feasible. A long-term study is needed to correlate volumetric assessment with patient outcome.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

RTOG 94-06: is the addition of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy to dose-escalated 3D conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer associated with treatment toxicity?

PURPOSE: This study determines the effect on toxicity of adding neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) to three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) in RTOG 94-06. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between August 1994 and February 2000, 583 eligible prostate cancer patients enrolled on the first 3 dose levels of RTOG 94-06, a Phase I/II dose escalation 3D-CRT trial. Two hundred and seven men initiated hormonal therapy (HT) between 2 to 3 months before 3D-CRT, and completed all HT no longer than 3 months after radiotherapy. Thirty-three patients receiving longer-duration HT were excluded. The 547 patients were treated at dose level I (68.4 Gy), level II (73.8 Gy), or level III (79.2 Gy). All dose prescriptions were to the minimum isodose surface encompassing the planning target volume (dose levels I and II) or the clinical target volume (dose level III). Men were stratified into three risk groups according to their relative risk of seminal vesicle invasion: <15% (Group 1) vs. >15% (Group 2), or to T stage (T1, 2 vs. T3 tumors [Group 3]). In Group 2 patients, there was a clinical target volume reduction to treat only the prostate after delivery of 55.8 Gy to a planning target volume including the seminal vesicles. All HT consisted of a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist with or without a nonsteroidal anti-androgen. RESULTS: On univariate analysis, NHT significantly increased the likelihood of Grade 2 acute genitourinary (GU) complications (22% to 32%, p = 0.009). Hormonal therapy did not have a significant univariate effect on any other acute or late toxicity. On multivariate analysis, the percent of the bladder (< or =30% vs. >30%) receiving > or = the reference dose (68.4 Gy, 73.8 Gy, or 79.2 Gy) (p = 0.0009, relative risk = 2.07, confidence interval: 1.88-2.28) was a significant predictor of acute GU effects. Although NHT was not significant in itself, in the multivariate analysis its interaction with baseline urinary status was an important factor (p = 0.011, relative risk = 4.31, confidence interval: 1.68-5.29). CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant HT did not show an independent effect on the risk of side effects after 3D-CRT in patients treated on RTOG 94-06. However, this combined modality therapy significantly increased the risk of acute GU effects compared to 3D-CRT alone in men with poor baseline urinary function.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2005

A retrospective analysis of locally advanced esophageal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy followed by surgery or surgery alone.

BACKGROUND: We conducted an institutional review of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer who had complete pretreatment and surgical staging to identify variables predictive of outcome. METHODS: From 1993 through 2002, 286 patients presented for surgical therapy of esophageal cancer. Of these, 176 patients met criteria for review including pretreatment endoscopic ultrasound stages IIA through IVA and a transthoracic surgical approach with "two-field" lymph node dissection. This cohort was primarily male (84.7%, n = 149) with adenocarcinoma (88.6%, n = 156), and 101 patients (57.3%) demonstrated endoscopic ultrasound stage III or IVA. RESULTS: Eighty-five (48.3%) patients presented to surgery after receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy, and 91 (51.7%) underwent surgery alone. Both groups were well matched with respect to comorbidities and pretreatment stage. Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation demonstrated a nonsignificant trend toward increased operative mortality and nonfatal morbidity. The overall median survival was 16.8 months, and there was no survival difference comparing patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery or surgery alone (p = 0.82). The subset of 25 patients (29.4%) demonstrating a complete pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy however had superior survival (median survival = 57.6 months, p < 0.01) as compared with neoadjuvant chemoradiation patients demonstrating partial downstaging (n = 36, 42.3%), no downstaging (n = 24, 28.2%), and surgery alone patients. Multivariate analysis identified a complete pathologic response, endoscopic ultrasound stage, and number of pathologically positive lymph nodes as independent predictors of survival. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced esophageal cancer as the subset of patients who demonstrate a complete pathologic response experienced significantly better survival.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Chemotherapy with taxanes in breast cancer during pregnancy: case report and review of the literature.

Two patients with breast cancer received docetaxel-containing chemotherapy as adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy during pregnancy. The first pregnant patient began neoadjuvant therapy with doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide at 14 weeks of gestation. After 4 cycles of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide and surgery, she received adjuvant docetaxel for 4 cycles. The second patient began neoadjuvant therapy with doxorubicin/docetaxel at 14 weeks of gestation and received 6 cycles. The fetus of the first patient had hydrocephalus on ultrasound at 17 weeks of gestation (before docetaxel therapy) that persisted on serial follow-up ultrasounds and spontaneously regressed over several months after delivery. No fetal malformations were detected in the second fetus. These 2 cases add to the existing data on the use of taxanes during pregnancy. Although the data are limited with case reports, pregnant patients with cancer can be treated with chemotherapy including taxanes during the second and third trimesters without significant risks to the fetus. Taxanes should not be excluded, if indicated, in pregnant patients with cancer.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Endoscopic ultrasound for preoperative staging of esophageal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is potentially the best method for pretreatment staging of esophageal carcinoma once distant metastases have been excluded by other methods. However, its apparent accuracy might be influenced by the use of neoadjuvant therapy. To determine the accuracy of EUS in patients undergoing esophageal resection, the authors reviewed their experience with EUS. METHODS: A total of 73 patients with esophageal carcinoma who underwent an esophagectomy between April 2000 and February 2005 were examined using preoperative EUS and computed tomography (CT). Of these patients, 39 also underwent preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Both EUS and CT scan were used to determine the depth of tumor penetration (T-stage) and the presence of lymph node metastases (N-stage). These results then were compared with staging determined after pathologic examination of the resected surgical specimen. RESULTS: For patients not undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, T-stage was accurately determined by EUS in 79%, N-stage in 74%, and tumor node metastasis (TNM) classification in 65% of the cases. However, when patients who had undergone neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were included, the overall accuracy of EUS was 64% for T-stage, 63% for N-stage, and 53% for TNM classification. For the patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy, EUS indicated a more advanced T-stage in 49%, N-stage in 38%, and TNM classification in 51% of the cases, as compared with pathology. The overall accuracy of EUS for T- and N-stage carcinomas was superior to that of CT scanning. CONCLUSION: For patients who do not undergo preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, EUS is a more accurate method for determining T- and N-stage resected esophageal carcinomas. Neoadjuvant therapy, however, results in apparent overstaging, predominantly because of tumor downstaging, and this reduces the apparent accuracy of EUS (and CT scanning) in this patient group. Nevertheless, EUS staging before neoadjuvant therapy could be more accurate than pathologic staging after treatment, thereby providing better initial staging information, which can be used to facilitate treatment.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Significance of micrometastases in pelvic lymph nodes detected by real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy after neoadjuvant hormonal therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the significance of micrometastases in pelvic lymph nodes in patients treated by radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer after neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 52 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer who received NHT followed by RP. The expression of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in 989 lymph nodes isolated from the 52 patients were assessed by a fully quantitative real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). We regarded specimens in which either PSA or PSMA mRNA were positive as showing the 'presence of micrometastasis'. Lymph node specimens were also stained immunohistochemically with an antibody against PSA. RESULTS: Pathological examinations detected tumour cells in 11 lymph nodes from four patients, and real-time RT-PCR further identified micrometastasis in 40 lymph nodes from 19 patients with no pathological evidence of nodal involvement. The presence of micrometastatic cancer cells was confirmed by immunohistochemical staining in 19 lymph nodes from 11 patients with pathologically negative nodes. The presence of micrometastases was significantly associated with other conventional prognostic variables, including the pretreatment serum PSA level, biopsy Gleason score and surgical margin status. The biochemical recurrence-free survival rate in patients with no micrometastasis was significantly higher than that in those with micrometastasis. Furthermore, multivariate analysis identified the presence of micrometastasis as an independent factor predicting biochemical recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Although residual foci of atrophic prostate cancer cells in resected lymph nodes after NHT can be difficult to diagnose by routine pathological examination, the present results show the usefulness of quantitative real-time RT-PCR targeting PSA and PSMA genes for detecting micrometastatic tumour foci in pelvic lymph nodes from patients with localized prostate cancer treated by NHT followed by RP. Furthermore, the present findings suggest that micrometastases in pelvic lymph nodes might be, at least partly, important in the development of biochemical recurrence in some patients undergoing RP after NHT.

Androgen Antagonists↗

PubMed2003

Neoadjuvant hormone therapy before salvage radiotherapy for an increasing post-radical prostatectomy serum prostate specific antigen level.

PURPOSE: We retrospectively evaluated the benefit of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy administered before salvage external beam radiation treatment in patients with biochemical failure following retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 81 patients were treated with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy before salvage external beam radiation treatment because of an increased prostate specific antigen (PSA) level following RRP. Preoperative, pathological, postoperative, and pre-salvage treatment parameters and radiation therapy dosage were examined for influence on outcome. Biochemical failures after RRP or salvage external beam radiation treatment were defined as a PSA greater than 0.3 ng/ml on 2 consecutive measurements. Median radiation dose delivered was 60 Gy. Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy consisted of a 3 month injection of a luteinizing hormone releasing hormone analogue. Median followup was 38 months (range 12 to 102) after completion of external beam radiation treatment and 91 months (range 20 to 163) after radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: The actuarial free biochemical failure rates at 3 and 5 years were 75% and 50%, respectively. Two patients (2%) died of prostate cancer. Significant predictors of response to salvage external beam radiation treatment on a univariate analysis were a pre-radiation serum PSA less than 1 ng/ml and a pathological Gleason score less than 7. However, only pre-radiation PSA remained statistically significant on a multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: External beam radiation with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy is a viable option for patients with an increasing post-prostatectomy serum PSA. The most powerful predictor of biochemical failure was pre-radiation serum PSA.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

Three-month neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy: a 7-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the outcome, assessed as the level of prostate specific antigen (PSA), of a mature (more than half the events recorded) prospective randomized study with a median follow-up of 82 months of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy, as this has been suggested to decrease the rate of positive surgical margins (i.e. provide greater potential to completely excise the tumour). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From December 1991 to March 1994, 126 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were randomized between direct radical prostatectomy or a 3-month course of a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue before surgery. The patients were followed by PSA determinations and a value of > 0.5 ng/mL used to define progression. RESULTS: The incidence of positive surgical margins decreased from 45.5% to 23.6% (P = 0.016) with hormone treatment. Despite this there was no difference in PSA progression-free survival at the last follow-up; it was 51.5% for those undergoing radical prostatectomy only and 49.8% for those who received hormonal pretreatment (P = 0.588). CONCLUSIONS: Three months of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy offers no benefit to the patient and cannot be recommended for routine clinical use.

Aged↗

PubMed2006

Association of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy with adverse health-related quality of life after permanent iodine-125 brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the influence of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) on health-related quality of life after permanent iodine-125 brachytherapy (BT) for prostate cancer. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite health-related quality-of-life instrument was administered to 134 consecutive patients a median of 29 months after BT. A separate group of 111 patients with comparable demographic characteristics without any prior treatment for prostate cancer rendered the baseline information (control group). The scores and symptom rates were compared. The effect of NHT was tested for independence in a multivariate analysis. RESULTS: In contrast to patients who received NHT, prostatic edema was hardly detectable 30 days after implantation in patients who received BT alone (comparing median preimplant and postimplant volumes), resulting in a greater dose to the prostate and anterior rectal wall. However, compared with the control group and the patients who received BT alone, the addition of NHT to BT led to lower health-related quality-of-life scores in all domains. Score differences of more than 10 points with a statistical significance were found for the urinary bother, sexual function/bother, and hormonal function/bother domains. Apart from the sexual function scores (patient age shown to be the crucial factor), the influence of NHT remained independent on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The results stress the need for well-considered administration of NHT before BT and the need for reporting the use of NHT in studies dealing with BT-related toxicity.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Enhanced expression of heat shock protein 27 following neoadjuvant hormonal therapy is associated with poor clinical outcome in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to characterize changes in the expression of heat shock protein 27 (HSP27) in prostate cancer before and after androgen withdrawal therapy and to assess the prognostic significance of HSP27 expression in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) following neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 97 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer who received NHT followed by RP. Paired needle biopsy and corresponding RP specimens obtained from these patients were analyzed for expression of the HSP27 protein by immunohistochemical staining. These findings were evaluated with respect to several clinicopathological factors. RESULTS: HSP27 expression in the RP specimens following NHT was significantly up-regulated compared with that in the corresponding needle biopsy specimens. The expression level of HSP27 in the biopsy specimens was significantly associated with the biopsy Gleason score, but not with other factors available before RP. HSP27 expression in the RP specimens was significantly correlated with the pre-operative value of serum prostate-specific antigen and pathological stage, but not with other pathological factors. Biochemical recurrence-free survival in patients with strong HSP27 expression in the RP specimens was significantly lower than that in those with weak HSP27 expression; however, the expression level of HSP27 was not an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence. CONCLUSION: Despite the lack of independent significance, the expression level of HSP27 in prostate cancer tissue after NHT, which may inversely reflect the therapeutic effect of NHT, could be a useful parameter predicting biochemical recurrence in patients undergoing RP.

Aged↗

PubMed2000

Update on Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center studies of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: We report the results of surgery in 520 patients with clinically localized carcinoma of the prostate (CaP) who received preoperative neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) for 3 to 11(+) months. METHODS: The results in the NHT patients were compared with those in 1,413 men having surgery without NHT at our institution during the same time period. In the group without pretreatment, the median and mean follow-up was 36 and 21 months, respectively. In the patients receiving NHT, the median follow-up was 33 months and the mean 41 months. RESULTS: The overall disease-free survival (DFS) rate (serum prostate specific antigen [PSA] concentration < or = 0.2 ng/mL) was 75% at 5 years and 50% at 10 years. There was no statistically significant difference in overall DFS rate between men who had NHT and those who did not. No DFS advantage could be demonstrated for those patients with a presenting PSA >20 ng/mL who received NHT compared with patients with the same PSA concentration who did not receive NHT. Despite our previous experience indicating improved survival with NHT in men with a presenting PSA of > 10 ng/mL, we could find no advantage to NHT in enhancing DFS. At a median survival of 35 months (mean 41 months) in 201 men with an initial PSA > or = 10 ng/mL, 70% had an undetectable PSA concentration at 5 years compared with 72% at the same time point in men presenting with PSA <10 ng/mL. In the group expected to have the best surgical result; i.e. those men whose preoperative PSA was < or = 7 ng/mL, there was no DFS difference in men given NHT compared with those having no hormonal manipulation. Patients presenting with stage T(1) disease had a significantly better DFS than those with either T(2) or T(3) CaP. However, within each stage, the addition of NHT to surgery did not result in a higher DFS rate. The 5- and 10-year DFS rates for stage T(1) were 80% and 64%, for T2 disease 78% and 50%, and for T3 disease 67% and 50%. There was a statistically significant difference (P < or = 0.003) in survival between stage T(1) and stage T(2) disease, but no significant difference in DFS was noted in patients presenting with stage T(2) compared with T3 cancer (P = 0.431). Gleason score was not a significant predictor of durable DFS, and the addition of NHT did not improve the DFS within groups of patients with similar Gleason scores. Men with only one or two positive biopsy cores did significantly better than those with more than three positive cores (P = 0.06). There was a significant difference in DFS between men who had organ-confined disease and those with disease outside the gland (P = 0.0003). However, NHT did not improve DFS. The presence of positive surgical margins was a negative prognostic factor (P = 0. 001). Men who received NHT had a statistically lower positive margin rate (P = 0.001), but NHT did not increase the likelihood of a durable DFS (P = 0.175). The duration of NHT did not affect the DFS (P = 0.100 for <3 v >3 months). CONCLUSION: There appears to be no subset of men undergoing radical prostatectomy in whom the routine administration of NHT is beneficial despite the statistically significant improvement in the pathologic findings.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2000

Effects of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy on prostate biopsy results after (125)I and (103)Pd seed implantation.

BACKGROUND: Androgen ablation may improve the efficacy of radiation therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 296 patients who had either (125)I (206; 70%) or (103)Pd (90; 30%) transperineal prostate brachytherapy (no external-beam radiation) had routine transrectal ultrasound-guided needle biopsy (minimum six cores) 2 years after treatment without regard to disease status. Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT: leuprolide acetate and flutamide) was used in 115 patients (39%) for 3 months prior to and 3 months after the implant. RESULTS: Of the 296 patients, 30 (10%) had positive prostate biopsies. Biopsies were positive in 4 of 115 (3.5%) v 26 of 181 (14%) of those who received or had not received NHT, respectively (P = 0.002). When patients were separated into low risk (PSA < or = 10 ng/mL, stage < or = T(2a), and Gleason score < or = 6) and high risk (all others), it was seen that low-risk patients did not benefit from NHT (3.8 v 7.7% positive biopsy rate; P = 0.5) whereas high-risk patients did (3.4% v 21.1%; P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Prostate brachytherapy yields high negative biopsy rates (90%) 2 years after treatment. Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy can improve the local control rates (as determined by biopsy) in patients undergoing (125)I or (103)Pd seed implantation. These results are most significant for patients who present with PSA >10 ng/mL, stage > or = T(2b) diseases, or Gleason score > or = 7 (high-risk status).

Androgen Antagonists↗

PubMed2004

[Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer: an overview].

The clinical benefits of endocrine therapy for patients with hormonosensitive breast cancer remains perfectly established. For instance, tamoxifen, the gold standard of the adjuvant treatment, has largely contributed of the effectiveness of such a therapy. The recent development of new endocrine agents (the third-generation aromatase inhibitors, selective estrogen receptors modulators), provides to physicians the opportunity of a more effective and tolerable therapeutic approach, in the metastatic disease setting or likely in adjuvant setting for breast cancer patients. Preoperative therapy has been widely used for the treatment of initially inoperable locally advanced breast cancers with the main objective of breast-conserving surgery. The benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has widely been demonstrated; however, the success of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy is much recent. The clinical and pharmacological data of the main published studies using neoadjuvant hormonotherapy are presented herein this review. Therefore, clinical and histologic assessments of response brings essential informations about the breast cancer hormonal sensitivity, but may also be predictor of the future (adjuvant or metastatic) treatment responsiveness.

Anastrozole↗

PubMed2003

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: analysis of histopathology and outcome.

To examine the histopathologic effect of neoadjuvant therapy and its impact on survival in patients with carcinoma of the pancreas, we retrospectively reviewed the records of 116 patients who underwent resections for pancreatic cancer from 1987 to 2000. Median follow-up of surviving patients was 19 mo(range 4-150 mo). Preoperative chemotherapy was administered in 61 patients (53%) and consisted of 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin C in 35 patients and gemcitabine in 26 patients, given concurrently with external beam radiation (5040 cGy). All resections were performed with curative intent (98 Whipples, 11 total, 6 distal, and 1 central pancreatectomy). Histopathologic examination included an estimation of the amount of fibrosis present in the tumor specimen (expressed as the percentage of fibrosis identified relative to the amount of neoplastic cells present). The mean fibrosis level for the series was 56% (range 5% to 100%). The administration of neoadjuvant therapy resulted in greater fibrosis (73%) than no preoperative treatment (38%) (p = 0.0001). Higher mean fibrosis levels were observed in patients with negative lymph nodes (p = 0.0006) and negative margins (p = 0.05). Factors associated with improved survival(log rank test) included: negative margins (p = 0.001), negative lymph nodes (p = 0.03), and use of neoadjuvant therapy (p = 0.03). Median survival in the neoadjuvant group was 23 mo vs 16 mo without preoperative therapy (p = 0.03). In conclusion, the use of neoadjuvant therapy resulted in a greater degree of fibrosis in the specimen. Patients with negative margins and negative lymph nodes had a greater amount of fibrosis present, and these were significant predictors of improved outcome. Although retrospective,this series suggests an improvement in survival in patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2005

Enhanced expression of the secreted form of clusterin following neoadjuvant hormonal therapy as a prognostic predictor in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

The objective of this study was to characterize changes in clusterin expression in prostate cancer before and after neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT), and to assess the prognostic significance of clusterin expression following NHT in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Paired needle biopsy and corresponding radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens obtained from 76 patients were analyzed for expression of clusterin protein by immunohistochemical staining with an antibody recognizing all of the clusterin isoforms. RP specimens following NHT demonstrated stronger expression of clusterin than the corresponding needle biopsy specimens. Clusterin protein was present in the cytoplasm of both biopsy and RP specimens; however, there was no nuclear staining identified in any specimens. The expression level of clusterin in biopsy specimens was significantly associated with the biopsy Gleason score, but not with other parameters available before RP. Furthermore, clusterin expression in RP specimens was significantly associated with the preoperative prostate specific antigen value and pathological stage, but not with other pathological factors. Biochemical recurrence-free survival in patients with strong clusterin expression in RP specimens was significantly lower than that in those with weak clusterin expression; however, the level of clusterin expression could not be used as an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence. These findings suggest that despite the lack of independent significance, the expression level of the secreted form of clusterin in prostate cancer tissue after NHT, which may inversely reflect the therapeutic effect of NHT, could be a useful parameter predicting biochemical recurrence in patients undergoing RP.

Aged↗

PubMed2006

The limited significance of a longer duration of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy prior to radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer in Japanese men.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic significance of a longer duration of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) followed by radical prostatectomy (RP) in Japanese men with high-risk prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included a total of 42 patients with high-risk prostate cancer who were treated with NHT for >or=8 months prior to RP. In this series high-risk prostate cancer was defined as clinical stage T2c or T3, pretreatment serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >20 ng/ml and/or a biopsy Gleason score of 8-10. Biochemical recurrence was defined as a serum PSA level of >or=0.2 ng/ml. The data of these patients were retrospectively reviewed to clarify the relationships between treatment outcomes and various clinicopathological parameters. RESULTS: The clinical stage was T2c in 13 patients and T3 in 29, the median value of pretreatment serum PSA was 43.3 ng/ml (range 9.7-322.2), and the biopsy Gleason score was 6 in 3 patients, 7 in 16 and >or=8 in 23. Following NHT (median 12 months, range 8-27), the median value of serum PSA decreased to 0.05 ng/ml (<0.01-18.3 ng/ml), and 15 patients (35.7%) were pathologically downstaged. During the median follow-up of 38 months (range 8-58), 11 patients (26.2%) developed biochemical recurrence, and the multivariate analysis identified pretreatment serum PSA, biopsy Gleason score and percentage of positive biopsy core as independent predictors of biochemical recurrence. The 3-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rate of the 42 patients was 68.3%, which was not significantly different from that of 34 patients who underwent RP for high-risk prostate cancer without NHT during the same period. CONCLUSION: A longer duration of NHT followed by RP for patients with high-risk prostate cancer resulted in a comparatively favorable outcome. However, despite the nonrandomized retrospective analysis, the present findings suggest no significant impact of long-term NHT on biochemical recurrence. Longer follow-up is needed to determine whether this therapeutic strategy is beneficial for high-risk prostate cancer patients.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Prognosis of stage pT0 after prolonged neoadjuvant endocrine therapy of prostate cancer: a matched-pair analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Stage pT0 following prolonged neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (PPNET) of prostate cancer is of great clinical interest, because this finding suggests maximum tumor damage. Therefore pT0 patients are expected to have an extremely favorable PSA progression rate. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the PSA progression rate of pT0 patients after PPNET is lower than that of non-pT0 patients after PPNET. METHODS: 174 patients with previously untreated, clinical stage cT1-3 carcinomas were submitted to PSA monitored complete androgen deprivation therapy followed by radical prostatectomy (RP). In 138 patients the RP specimens showed residual cancer, in 36 patients no residual cancer was found. Biochemical progression was defined as PSA >/=0.2ng/ml. To control for confounding prognostic factors (Gleason score, cT-stage) between both groups a matched-pair analysis for the cumulative risk of biochemical failure was performed, resulting in 30 matched pairs. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 37.9 and 46.0 months in the matched non-pT0 and pT0 cohort respectively, matched-pair analysis failed to demonstrate significant differences in crude PSA relapse-free survival between both groups (p=0.7758). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that patients converted into pT0 after PPNET do not represent a subgroup with an extremely favorable prognosis. However our results have to be confirmed by the assessment of larger cohorts of pT0 patients with a longer follow-up. The presented data do not allow drawing any conclusions on the prognostic impact of PPNET in general.

Anilides↗

PubMed1999

Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy Prior to Radical Prostatectomy.

The US T(2b) study of 3 months of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) showed a reduction in the likelihood of positive margins from 48% (control group) to 18% in the treated patients. Follow-up at 42 months shows that the cumulative relapse rate (prostate specific antigen) for 129 patients having NHT was not statistically different from that of the 126 control patients. Because the T(2b) study has been criticized for lacking central pathology review, we present a review of a series involving only one surgeon (MS) and one pathologist (FC) of NHT plus prostatectomy (109 patients) v prostatectomy alone (145 patients) with 24 months' follow-up. Positive margins were decreased from 38% in the untreated to 28% in the treated group, the only statistically significant difference in the results. Biochemical recurrence (PSA >0.2 ng/mL) was higher in the treated group, reflecting selection of more aggressive tumors for NHT, but the difference was not statistically significantly. The incidence of extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and lymph node metastasis was similar in the two groups. The largest nonrandomized experience with NHT shows a decrease in the incidence of positive surgical margins when used in high-risk patients with clinically localized carcinoma of the prostate. However, it does not have an impact on disease-free survival at a mean 24-month follow-up.

Journal Article↗