SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “prognostic factor”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 433 records · Page 24Linked to original sources

PubMed1989

Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: prognostic factors and patterns of recurrence.

Survival data, prognostic factors, and patterns of recurrence were analyzed for 70 women with adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix treated between 1968 and 1982. The 5-year survival rates for stages I, II, and III-IV were 82, 90, and 38%, respectively. Control of pelvic tumor was achieved in 82, 80, and 12.5% of cases of stage I, II, and III-IV disease, respectively. When radiation therapy techniques alone were employed, pelvic control was achieved in 100% of stage I and 75% of stage II cases. Tumor grade was an important prognostic factor in stage I disease, with 92% of patients with grade 1 and 2 lesions surviving 5 years, in contrast to 68% of patients with grade 3 lesions (P less than 0.05, log rank test).

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed1997

Prognostic factors in bone sarcomas.

Based on a literature review and the SSG experience, the most important prognostic factors in high-grade osteosarcoma appear to be the presence of detectable metastases at diagnosis, tumour volume, old age, sex, histologic response, and possibly tumoral P-glycoprotein expression. However, for an adolescent patient with non-metastatic extremity disease, there is no consensus regarding prognostic factors at initial presentation, and currently there is thus no established method for dividing them into high- and low risk groups for the purpose of treatment differentiation. It should also be remembered that available prognostic factors have been identified only in a retrospective manner, following aggressive treatment of all patients. Thus patients in "favourable" prognostic groups may simply be patients who have had a good effect from aggressive treatment, and how they would have done with reduced treatment remains to be shown. Obviously the best method for prognostication would be the direct demonstration of micrometastatic disease in the lungs or in peripheral blood. In the relatively near future, this may become possible with immunoscintigrapy or immunohistochemistry utilizing monoclonal antibodies [29-31]. In Ewing's sarcoma, the most powerful factors indicating poor prognosis are metastases at diagnosis, poor histologic response, large tumour size and possibly pelvic localisation. There appears to be a somewhat better international consensus regarding prognostic factors in Ewing's sarcoma than in osteosarcoma. Although several studies have implemented intensified treatment for poor prognostic groups [8, 32], the role (if any) of high-dose treatment with stem cell rescue remains to be proven. The same factors are prognostic both for the development of metastases and local recurrence, but in addition, surgical treatment as opposed to radiotherapy appears to reduce local failure rate [12, 17, 33, 34]. As in osteosarcoma, the near future offers promise regarding the detection and quantification of micrometastatses and minimal residual disease, by means of PCR techniques recognizing specific genetic changes in the Ewing family of tumors [35].

Adolescent↗

PubMed2000

Tumor volume: a novel prognostic factor in patients who undergo curative resection for gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The present study evaluates the significance of tumor volume as a prognostic factor in gastric cancer. PATIENTS/METHODS: Tumor volume was measured from serial tissue sections of 101 patients who had undergone curative resection for solitary carcinoma of the stomach using a computer graphics analysis program. These patients were analyzed with respect to survival based on univariate and multivariate analyses of clinicopathological factors, including tumor volume, to determine an independent prognostic factor. RESULTS: Significant differences in survival were found with respect to depth of tumor invasion (P=0.001), status of lymph-node metastasis (P=0.018), tumor diameter (P=0.005), and tumor volume (P<0.0001) based on univariate analysis. However, multivariate analysis indicated only tumor volume as a valid factor in determining prognosis among the nine variables and was significantly associated with the prognosis (P=0.0005; relative risk 18.23; 95% confidence interval 3.52-94.37). CONCLUSION: The present findings indicate that tumor volume is an important prognostic factor in patients who undergo curative resection for gastric cancer and may be an alternative to conventional factors, thus providing a novel independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Stages III and IV invasive epithelial ovarian carcinoma in younger versus older women: what prognostic factors are important?

UNLABELLED: OBJECTIVE; To compare the survival rates in younger (45 years or younger) and older women (over 45) diagnosed with advanced-stage invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. Clinical and pathologic factors responsible for survival differences between the two groups were also determined. METHODS: All younger women with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma diagnosed between 1984 and 2001 were identified from tumor registry databases at two hospitals. Patients with borderline tumors were excluded. An older group of comparable controls was selected for comparison. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to determine the predictors for survival. RESULTS: Of 104 women with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma, 52 were 45 or younger and the rest were over 45. The 5-year survival rate and median survival in younger patients were 48% and 54 months, compared with 22% and 34 months in the older women (P =.003). Younger women had significantly better performance status than older patients, and survival remained significantly better in younger women based on Kaplan-Meier analysis stratified by performance status (0 versus 1 to 2, P =.02). Furthermore, overall survival was significantly better in younger women after stratification by stage (III versus IV, P =.002) and by cytoreductive surgery (optimal versus suboptimal, P =.003). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that all these factors remained as significant independent prognostic factors for survival. CONCLUSION: Younger women with advanced-stage invasive epithelial ovarian cancer have significantly improved survival rates relative to older patients. Age, performance status, stage of disease, and extent of cytoreductive surgery are important independent prognostic factors for survival.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

[Recent prognostic factors for breast cancer].

The recent highlighted points in prognostic factors after breast cancer operation include: 1) the emergence of many genetic and biochemical markers, including c-erbB-2, int-2, EGFR, p53, nm23, LOH, E cadherin, s-phase fraction. The prognostic value of these factors is related to their role in cell cycle regulation, invasion/metastasis mechanisms, etc. The agents related to therapeutic effectiveness, namely p-glycoprotein, pS2, and bcl-2 may become important stratification factors when conducting clinical trials. Pathologic factors, like nodal status, however, are the most useful prognostic factors at the moment. Many newly developed prognostic factors should be examined by multivariate analysis and validated prospectively before clinical use.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗

PubMed1985

Prognostic factors and therapeutic results in multiple myeloma.

Prognostic factors in 68 consecutive patients with myeloma treated at the National Cancer Center Hospital from 1962 to 1984 were analyzed. Median survival time from onset was 100 months for stage I, 72 months for stage II, and 26 months for stage III of the Durie and Salmon's clinical staging system. It was 55 months in patients with normal renal function and 18 months in those with abnormal renal function. All early deaths occurred in patients with stage III disease. Hemoglobin level, bone lytic lesions and presence of Bence Jones protein were also significant prognostic factors. On the other hand, heavy chain as well as light chain subtypes of monoclonal immunoglobulin (M-component) and M-component production rate did not influence the survival of myeloma patients. The analysis of chemotherapeutic responses and survival curves according to the chemotherapy used in this study (alkylating agent vs Vinca-alkaloid plus alkylating agent) did not disclose any significant difference between the two groups. The overall response rate was 67%. The survival time from the initial chemotherapy of responding patients was significantly longer than that of nonresponders.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

[Biological prognostic factors of cancers of the breast and their consequences on the therapeutic choice].

The value of prognostic factors can be measured by their influence on the therapeutic decision. Today, with the exception of clinical stage (TNM classification) and to a certain extent estrogen receptors, prognostic factors have little or no application in the clinical practice. The great number of parameters and the discrepancies between various studies may provide some explanations. By the study of the genetic evolution of breast cancers at the chromosomal level, we propose an approach to the understanding of the redundancy of prognostic factors, often noted by the authors. The consequences on the multiparametric statistical methodology are also discussed. Finally, by distinguishing between prognostic factors (predicting survival) and predictive factors (related to treatment response), we hope to provide indications for a better use of the progress in our knowledge on the biology of breast cancers.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

PubMed1996

[Prognostic factors for esophageal cancer--from the viewpoint of molecular biology].

The prognostic factors for esophageal cancer from the viewpoint of molecular biology are reviewed. Among several oncogenes and suppressor genes erbB, int2/hst1/Cyclin D1 and MDM2 gene amplifications are significant prognostic factors for esophageal cancer. The value of p53 mutation, and expression of matrix metalloproteinase (MMPs) in the prediction of patients' survival are controversial, so further research is needed. High expression of tumor proliferation-related factors (Ki67, PCNA, and AgNOR), abnormalities of adhesion molecule (E-Cadherin, alpha-Catenin), activation of autocrine mechanism of growth factor (EGFR-TGF alpha, EGF), and DNA ploidy pattern, which is thought to be the result of an accumulation of genomic abnormalities are also prognostic factors for esophageal cancer.

Animals↗

PubMed1995

[Multiple myeloma--diagnosis, prognostic factors and treatment].

The problem of diagnosis, prognostic factors and the efficacy of therapies were investigated in 330 patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and 51 patients with benign monoclonal gammopathy (BMG)/monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Seven out of 51 patients with BMG/MGUS were transformed into MM. The mean time to the transformation was 61.6 months. M protein level in these patients had been gradually and constantly increasing until the transformation in contrast with stable level in non-transformed patients. In MM there was one year difference between median survival from the time of diagnosis and start of chemotherapies. It depended on the deferral of treatment in patients with stage I myeloma. No difference of survival time was found between initial and differed therapy for stage I myeloma. Earlier therapy is not advantageous in this stage. Stages and immunoglobulin classes of MM were prognostic factors. Stage I or IgG myeloma had the longest survival and stage III or BJP myeloma had the shortest one. The new protocol, DMVM plus natural interferon alpha therapy induced high complete remission rate of 37.1% in initial treatment patients. The survival rate at three years from the treatment was 70%.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

[The correlation between prognostic factors and outcome of second look laparotomy in ovarian cancer].

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to verify the correlation between prognostic factors, positive or negative second look laparotomy (SLL) and 5-year survival in patients with ovarian cancer. MATERIAL: Between 1984 and 1993, 178 patients after primary surgery and first-line chemotherapy with complete clinical response underwent second look laparotomy. The correlation between clinical stage and grade of cancers, residual disease, age of patients in two group of patients: with positive and negative second look laparotomy were evaluated. RESULTS: 95 patients (53%) had positive SLL. The 5-years survival in this group was only 20%. Adverse prognostic factors were: advanced primary stage (IV-0% of 5-years survival), low grade of differentiation (9.1% of 5-years survival) and residual disease > 2cm (9.4% of 5-years survival). The 5-year survival in group with negative SLL was 78.3%. The analysed prognostic factors in this group were insignificant in predicting 5-year survival. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that the SLL can provide an important prognostic evaluation in patients without evidence of disease and allows surgical cytoreduction in group with positive SLL (more than 50% of patients). The analyzed prognostic factors in group with negative SLL were insignificant in predicting 5-year survival. The multicenter research for new prognostic factors in this group are required.

Female↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Prognostic factors influencing complete response to treatment and survival of patients with nasopharyngeal cancer.

The identification of prognostic factors influencing local control and survival of patients with nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) might help in pointing out those patients who would probably benefit from primary treatment. A series of 137 Greek patients with locally advanced NPC treated with chemotherapy and/or radiation were analyzed for significant prognostic factors influencing complete response (CR) to treatment, time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). After the completion of treatment, 92 (67%) patients achieved CR. Logistic regression analysis revealed that only T classification was significant for CR (p = 0.0058). After a median follow-up of 5 years, 66 (48%) patients demonstrated tumor progression and 64 (47%) died. Median TTP was 25.8 months (range, 0.3-118+) and median survival 58.3 months (range, 0.3-124+). Cox proportional hazards model identified age (p = 0.024) and T classification (p = 0.009) as significant factors for TTP. These two factors were also found to be significant for OS (p = 0.005 and p = 0.013, respectively). The present study has shown that major prognostic factors influencing the outcome of our patients with NPC are similar to those reported in recent Chinese studies. These prognostic factors may be used as stratification factors in randomized clinical trials.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1996

[Prognostic factors in malignant gliomas].

The most important prognostic factor in malignant gliomas is histopathological diagnosis of the tumor. The survival of patients with anaplastic astrocytoma is much longer than that of patients with glioblastoma. The median survival of the former has been improved up to almost 4 years by the recent progress of multidisciplinary treatment, whereas that of the latter has still remained in less than 1.5 years. Other important factors proved to be associated with survival of patients with malignant gliomas are the age of patients, Karnofsky performance status on admission, surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. There is substantial evidence suggesting an association between younger patient age and longer survival in adults with supratentorial anaplastic astrocytoma as well as glioblastoma. It is also consistent with evidence that the patients with better performance status on admission live longer after treatment. Gross total resection of supratentorial anaplastic astrocytoma is directly associated with longer and better survival when compared to subtotal or partial resection. For glioblastoma, however, gross total resection has not been proved to have a significant survival advantage over subtotal or partial removal. Radiotherapy has been proved to be associated with longer survival of patients with supratentorial anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma. Chemotherapy has not proved effective in prolonging the survival of patients with glioblastoma. Multidrug chemotherapy with CCNU, procarbazine and vincristine has proved to have significant survival advantage over BCNU alone, suggesting chemotherapy is also a prognostic factor in patients with anaplastic astrocytoma.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Difference in prognostic factors between stage IB and II uterine cervical carcinoma patients treated with radical hysterectomy and postoperative radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the difference in prognostic factors between stage IB and II uterine cervical carcinoma patients treated with postoperative radiation therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between May 1988 and May 1998, a total of 94 patients including 47 patients with stage IB and 47 patients with stage II uterine cervical carcinoma were treated with postoperative radiation therapy at Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital. All patients were treated with 10 MV X-rays using an anterior-posterior parallel opposed field which covered the whole pelvis. Fractionation was 2 Gy per day, five fractions per week, to a total dose of 50 Gy. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival rates of stage IB and II were 89.4% and 79.3%, respectively. In multivariate analysis for all patients, lymph node status, histology, and surgical margin status were recognized as prognostic factors. Limited to stage IB patients, lymph node status was the only independent prognostic factor. However, for stage II patients, tumor histology was also an independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic factors of stage IB and II were different. Tumor histology was only associated with stage II patients. These findings suggested that tumor histology might have played a different role as tumor stage progressed. However, further studies with large numbers of patients will be required to confirm these results.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Patients with brain metastases from gastrointestinal tract cancer treated with whole brain radiation therapy: prognostic factors and survival.

AIM: To identify the prognostic factors with regard to survival for patients with brain metastasis from primary tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. METHODS: Nine hundred and sixteen patients with brain metastases, treated with whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) between January 1985 and December 2000 at the Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients presented with a primary tumor of the gastrointestinal tract (esophagus: n = 0, stomach: n = 10, colorectal: n = 47). Twenty-six patients had a solitary brain metastasis, 31 patients presented with multiple brain metastases. Surgical resection was performed in 25 patients. WBRT was applied with daily fractions of 2 Gray (Gy) or 3 Gy to a total dose of 50 Gy or 30 Gy, respectively. The interval between diagnoses of the primary tumors and brain metastases was 22.6 mo vs 8.0 mo for patients with primary tumors of the colon/rectum vs other primary tumors, respectively (P<0.01, log-rank). Median overall survival for all patients with brain metastases (n = 916) was 3.4 mo and 3.2 mo for patients with gastrointestinal neoplasms. Patients with gastrointestinal primary tumors presented significantly more often with a solitary brain metastasis than patients with other primary tumors (P<0.05, log-rank). In patients with gastrointestinal neoplasms (n = 57), the median overall survival was 5.8 mo for patients with solitary brain metastasis vs 2.7 mo for patients with multiple brain metastases (P<0.01, log-rank). The median overall survival for patients with a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) >=70 was 5.5 mo vs 2.1 mo for patients with KPS <70 (P<0.01, log-rank). At multivariate analysis (Cox Model) the performance status and the number of brain metastases were identified as independent prognostic factors for overall survival. CONCLUSION: Brain metastases occur late in the course of gastrointestinal tumors. Pretherapeutic variables like KPS and the number of brain metastases have a profound influence on treatment outcome.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Intrahepatic recurrence after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term results of treatment and prognostic factors.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the long-term results of treatment and prognostic factors in patients with intrahepatic recurrence after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Recent studies have demonstrated the usefulness of re-resection, transarterial oily chemoembolization (TOCE), or percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (PEIT) in selected patients with intrahepatic recurrent HCC. The overall results of a treatment strategy combining these modalities have not been fully evaluated, and the prognostic factors determining survival in these patients remain to be clarified. METHODS: Two hundred and forty-four patients who underwent curative resection for HCC were followed for intrahepatic recurrence, which was treated aggressively with a strategy including different modalities. Survival results after recurrence and from initial hepatectomy were analyzed, and prognostic factors were determined by univariate and multivariate analysis using 27 clinicopathologic variables. RESULTS: One hundred and five patients (43%) with intrahepatic recurrence were treated with re-resection (11), TOCE (71), PEIT (6), systemic chemotherapy (8) or conservatively (9). The overall 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates from the time of recurrence were 65.5%, 34.9%, and 19.7%, respectively, and from the time of initial hepatectomy were 78.4%, 47.2%, and 30.9%, respectively. The re-resection group had the best survival, followed by the TOCE group. Multivariate analysis revealed Child's B or C grading, serum albumin < or = 40 g/l, multiple recurrent tumors, recurrence < or = 1 year after hepatectomy, and concurrent extrahepatic recurrence to be independent adverse prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive treatment with a multimodality strategy could result in prolonged survival in patients with intrahepatic recurrence after curative resection for HCC. Prognosis was determined by the liver function status, interval to recurrence, number of recurrent tumors, any concurrent extrahepatic recurrence, and type of treatment.

Adult↗

PubMed1989

A multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in adult Hodgkin's disease.

A multivariate analysis of the prognostic factors was carried out with a Cox model on 167 patients with Stage I-IV Hodgkin's disease. The following indicators were prospectively registered: Sex, age, clinical stage, systemic symptoms, histological type, number of involved areas, nodal size, mediastinal thoracic ratio (MTR), localization of mediastinal involvement according to the aortic arcus, hilar involvement, extent of radiotherapy, and extent and mode of chemotherapy. A linear logistic analysis showed that most of the indicators were interrelated. This emphasizes the necessity of a multivariate analysis in order to assess the independent influence of each of them. The three main prognostic indicators for complete remission achievement were age, clinical stage and involvement of lung hili. The three main prognostic indicators for disease-free survival were sex, size of mediastinal involvement (MTR) and use of alternating chemotherapy COPP/ABVD in the initial treatment strategy. The most important prognostic factor for survival was clinical stage followed by hilar involvement, age, and nodal size. The coefficients estimated by Cox regression analysis can be used to combine the important prognostic factors into a single index for each patient at presentation. The prognostic index for each patient would allow the identification of cases with poor prognosis who might benefit from additional initial treatment.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

PubMed2005

[Prognostic factors of localized malignant melanoma: study of 639 patients].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Several clinical and histological prognostic factors have been identified in localized melanoma. However, further studies with better defined and more reproducible histological parameters are needed. Our aim was to identify the prognostic factors for survival in cutaneous melanoma in the Spanish population. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Six hundred and thirty nine patients with localized melanoma, stages I and II of the last version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma, with 2 years of follow-up or documented relapse, were selected from the database of the Department of Dermatology. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed for overall and disease free survival. RESULTS: Tumor thickness appeared as the most important prognostic factor for both overall and disease free survival in the multivariate analysis. Inflammatory infiltrate and sex were only significant for overall survival, and location, age and ulceration were significant for disease free survival. Other variables, such as histological type, mitotic rate or level of invasion, lost their prognostic significance in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor thickness is the most important prognostic factor to predict survival in localized melanoma. Other factors such as sex, inflammatory infiltrate, location, age or ulceration, have also an important role in prognosis.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1991

Prognosis and prognostic factors of retinal infarction: a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prognosis and adverse prognostic factors in patients with retinal infarction due to presumed atheromatous thromboembolism or cardiogenic embolism. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: University hospital departments of clinical neurology. PATIENTS: 99 patients with retinal infarction, without prior stroke, referred to a single neurologist between 1976 and 1986 and evaluated and followed up prospectively until death or the end of 1986 (mean follow up 4.2 years). INTERVENTIONS: Cerebral angiography (55 patients), aspirin treatment (37), oral anticoagulant treatment (eight), carotid endarterectomy (13), cardiac surgery (six), and peripheral vascular surgery (two). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Death, stroke, coronary events, contralateral retinal infarction; survival analysis confined to 98 patients with retinal infarction due to presumed artheromatous thromboembolism or cardiogenic embolism (one patient with giant cell arteries excluded), and Cox's proportional hazards regression analysis, including age as a prognostic factor. RESULTS: During follow up 29 patients died (21 of vascular causes and eight of non-vascular or unknown causes), 10 had a first ever stroke, 19 had a coronary event, and only one developed contralateral retinal infarction. A coronary event accounted for more than half (59%) of the deaths whereas stroke was the cause of only one death (3%). Over the first five years after retinal infarction the actuarial average absolute risk of death was 8% per year; of stroke 2.5% per year (7.4% in the first year); of coronary events 5.3% per year, exceeding that of stroke; and of stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death 7.4% per year. Prognostic factors associated with an increased risk of death were increasing age, peripheral vascular disease, cardiomegaly, and carotid bruit. Adverse prognostic factors for serious vascular events were increasing age and carotid bruit for stroke, and increasing age, cardiomegaly, and carotid bruit both for coronary events and for stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who present with retinal infarction due to presumed atherothromboembolism or cardiogenic embolism are at considerable risk of a coronary event. The risk of stroke, although high, is not so great. Not all strokes occurring after retinal infarction relate directly to disease of the ipsilateral carotid system, although this is probably the most common cause. Few patients experience contralateral retinal infarction. Non-arteritic retinal infarction should be diagnosed or confirmed by an ophthalmologist, and the long term care of patients with the condition should involve a physician who has an active interest in managing vascular disease.

Age Factors↗