PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Colonic Polyps”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 451 records · Page 25Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps.

OBJECTIVE: We performed CT colonography in patients referred for conventional colonoscopy, interpreted the axial images, and used commercially available software to reconstruct endoluminal perspective views to differentiate polyps from folds. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We prospectively examined 44 patients (27 men and 17 women; mean age, 58 years old) with CT colonography by interpreting the axial images and using three-dimensional rendering for problem solving only. The CT scans were interpreted by two radiologists who were unaware of patients' histories as revealed by colonoscopic findings. The findings on colonography were compared with those of conventional colonoscopy to determine sensitivity, specificity, time spent on interpretation, and confidence of interpretation. RESULTS: Colonoscopy showed normal findings in 28 patients and 22 polyps in the remaining 16 patients. Six polyps were 8 mm or larger, three were 5-7 mm, and 13 were 5 mm or smaller. The findings of the two observers revealed an overall sensitivity of 50% and 38%, respectively, and a specificity of 93% and 86%, respectively. Sensitivity for polyps larger than 8 mm was 83% and specificity was 100% for both observers. The average amount of time spent on interpretation was 28 min 30 sec (range, 14-65 min). Both observers used the endoluminal view for differentiating folds from polyps in 23 (52%) of 44 patients, which had only minimal impact on interpretation time. CONCLUSION: CT colonography can be performed and the images interpreted using currently available hardware and software by initially using the axial images to search for polyps of significant size. Endoluminal views should be used only when necessary to help distinguish normal folds from fixed raised lesions that are suggestive of polyps.

Colonic Polyps↗
PubMed2002

[Morphological characteristics of colon polyps].

The most widespread method of removal of the polyps was polypectomy through colonoscope with electrocoagulation of polyp leg or basis. The survey morphological study of 123 bioptates, received from the patients with polyposis, was carried out. For histological study of bioptates, preparations were painted with hematoxylin and cosine. It was determined, that adenomatous polyps were revealed in 66.7 +/- 4.2% of cases, fibrous polyps in 3.3 +/- 1.6% of cases. The results of comparative research of adenomatous polyps have shown, that common tubular polyps were revealed much more onen among adenomatous polyps--in 74.4 +/- 4.8% of cases. Tubular-papillar-villiferous polyps are revealed only in 25.6 +/- 4.8% of cases. Tubular polyps in the majority of cases (62 5.3%) had the expressed degree of dysplasia. The received data correspond the literary data, which shows that glandular T)olvDS concern to the most eood-cmalitv colonal tumours.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
PubMed1988

Follow-up of patients with colonic polyps containing severe atypia and invasive carcinoma. Compliance, recurrence, and survival.

Between January 1975 and December 1984 1769 polyps were endoscopically removed from 1219 patients. Eight percent of these patients had polyps containing severe atypia and 5.0% had polyps containing invasive cancer. A close postoperative surveillance program was followed by only a few patients, but compliance improved with longer follow-up intervals. Metachronous polyps were observed with similar frequency in patients with benign polyps (34.8%) and those with polyps containing severe atypia (23.8%) or cancer (41.7%). Patients in whom malignant polyps were endoscopically removed had a 5-year survival rate of 84.3% that did not differ from that of patients' whose polyps contained severe atypia (79.0%). It was concluded that endoscopic removal of malignant polyps with favorable histologic conditions does not impair survival. The follow-up program of these patients should be adapted to that of patients with benign polyps, a procedure that may even improve patient compliance.

Actuarial Analysis↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Histology of colonic polyps].

The authors present the modern classification of colorectal polyps. They discuss the dysplastic and preneoplastic changes in the light of new data on predisposing factors. Although new techniques are developing such as immunocytochemistry, DNA cytophotometry, DNA recombination, it is clear that presently, the basic morphological data, microscopical as well as histological, retain an irreplaceable diagnostic value. From a practical point of view, the authors recall the importance of an adequate orientation of the polyps before their histological examination in order to obtain all the necessary informations permitting an accurate diagnosis: type of the polyp, possible areas of cancer formation and their depth of penetration, histology of the surrounding mucosa and tissues.

Cell Transformation, Neoplastic↗
PubMed1976

Which colonic polyps should be excised endoscopically?

A review of 464 consecutive polypoid lesions of the colon reveals that virtually all pedunculated polyps and over 80% of 218 sessile polyps were removed colonoscopically. Although size or location of the lesions occasionally precludes colonoscopic excision, the endoscopic appearance of a sessile polyp is the most important factor in deciding upon the method of excision. In gneeral, smooth, soft, nonulcerated sessile lesions of all sizes were excised endoscopically, while approximately half of the larger (2-6 cm) firm, irregular-surfaced, benign sessile lesions, and all ulcerated or malignant sessile lesions required laparotomy for proper management. All polypoid lesions should be viewed endoscopically before deciding the method of excision, regardless of their size, location, or general appearnce by barium enema. Experience with endoscopic morphology and snare electrocautery technics was most important, since more than 85% of all polypoid lesions in this consecutive series were removed endoscopically.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1984

Colonic polyp patterns in familial polyposis.

The diagnosis of familial polyposis depends on there being more than 100 adenomatous polyps in the large bowel. The polyps are the result of intramucosal microadenomatous growth. The age at which this occurs varies, and in the early stages of polyp development relatively few larger polyps may be seen. The numbers and size of the polyps as seen on double-contrast barium enema were compared with the macroscopic findings on the resected specimens in 27 patients with proven polyposis. Of these patients, 23 (83%) were diagnosed when polyps were first found at sigmoidoscopy. Radiologically the predominant polyp size was more than 5 mm in only four cases, 2-5 mm in 22 (81%), and less than 2 mm in one. Of the 22 with predominately 2-5 mm polyps, eight had significant numbers of nodules smaller than 2 mm and three had considerable numbers of polyps larger than 5 mm. Eleven (41%) were thought to have fewer than 70 polyps. Pathologically the nodular pattern (less than 2 mm) predominated in 11 (41%) and 14 had polyps of 2-5 mm. More than 100 polyps were present in each case, with fewer than 500 polyps in eight. In the 11 patients thought radiologically to have fewer than 70 polyps, the nodular pattern predominated in nine. In the initial stages of polyp growth, the larger polyps are less numerous, and the background nodular pattern is a useful diagnostic feature of familial polyposis.

Adolescent↗