SEARCH · PubMed Health
Results for “Ear Protective Devices”
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
[Effect of rifle shooting on children's body].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Hearing protection.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The effect of earplugs on sleep measures during exposure to simulated intensive care unit noise.
BACKGROUND: Sleep deprivation may contribute to impaired immune function, ventilatory compromise, disrupted thermoregulation, and delirium. Noise levels in intensive care units may be related to disturbed sleep patterns, but noise reduction has not been tested in this setting. OBJECTIVE: To measure the effect of a noise reduction intervention on the sleep of healthy subjects exposed to simulated intensive care unit noise. METHODS: After digital audiotape recording of noise and development of the noise reduction intervention, 5 nocturnal 8-hour periods of sleep were measured in 6 paid, healthy volunteers at 7-day intervals in a sleep disorders center. Polysomnographic data were collected by experienced sleep disorders technicians and scored by certified raters. After the first 3 quiet nights, earplugs were randomly assigned to be worn on the fourth and fifth nights during exposure to the recorded noise. Sound pressure levels were measured during all 5 nights. RESULTS: Sleep architecture and sound measurements on quiet nights did not differ significantly. Sound levels were significantly lower on quiet nights than on noise nights. Exposure to the noise increased the number of awakenings, percentage of stage 2 sleep, and rapid eye movement latency and decreased time asleep, sleep maintenance efficiency index, and percentage of rapid eye movement sleep. Earplugs worn during exposure to the noise produced a significant decrease in rapid eye movement latency and an increase in the percentage of rapid eye movement sleep. CONCLUSION: The results provide a reasonable basis for testing the effects of earplugs on the sleep of critically ill subjects.
[Noise hazards in the working environment].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Influence of strict regulations on the use of hearing protectors in the Finnish Defence Forces.
The regulations concerning hearing protection during military training in the Finnish Defence Forces were renewed in 1989. The material of this prospective study concerns 912 consecutive conscripts (463 before and 449 after the new regulations) who were referred to the Central Military Hospital for acute acoustic trauma (AAT). We focused on three issues: (1) general habits regarding the use of hearing protection during shooting drills and combat training; (2) hearing protection at the moment of AAT; and (3) the cause of AAT. In combat training, the use of any hearing protectors was only 50% before the new regulations, but after they came into force the proportion was greater than 90%, and more effective protectors were used. However, at the time of AAT the hearing protection was absent in more than 80% of cases in both groups. The most common cause of AAT was small arms in both groups (83%).
Hearing loss and tinnitus in acute acoustic trauma.
Despite extensive educational and protective measures, acute acoustic trauma continues to be a major problem in young military recruits. This retrospective study concern conscripts from eastern Austria who were referred to the Central Military Hospital for acute acoustic trauma (AAT) during the last 18 months. The study was designed to provide information on the profile of hearing loss and the presence of tinnitus after AAT. At the time when AAT occurred, hearing protection was not used in the majority of cases. In more than 75% of the ears hearing loss was registered in the high-frequency region (above 2 kHz). In the remaining 25% the speech frequency range under 2 kHz was also affected. Interestingly, the degree of hearing loss was independent of the type of firearm used, the number of shots and the use of hearing protection (ear plugs). Hearing loss occurred asymmetrically due to one-sided noise, whereas the distribution of tinnitus was symmetrical. The majority of patients experienced both, tinnitus and hearing loss as a consequence of AAT. Yet, in 6.2% of the subjects tinnitus was the only symptom. These results strongly suggest that tinnitus is as important a symptom of AAT as is hearing loss. Therefore, we believe that a tinnitus match should be performed in every patient with suspected AAT.
Deafness, annoyance and stress.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Dentists at high risk for hearing loss: protection with custom earplugs.
This article provides information on the effects of noise, especially to dentists. It gives information on how to protect one's hearing and furnishes a technique to fabricate custom earplugs.
[Risk of hearing damage in connection with pop and rock concerts. The maximum permissible sound level should be legally confirmed].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Say no to noise.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Noise know-how.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Recognition, evaluation, and control.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Military ingenuity.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
[Acute acoustic trauma in military personnel. Evaluation of 1 year epidemiologic surveillance].
OBJECTIVES: Acute acoustic trauma (AAT) refers to damage to sensitive cochlear structures caused by excessive exposure to impulse noise. The aim of this study was to 1) assess the incidence of ATT in French soldiers and 2) to clarify the circumstances under which AAT occurs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out a prospective study of AAT events reported to medical officers in 1998. RESULTS: The incidence of AAT was 156 per 100,000 person-years (150-161). It was higher in conscripts and in soldiers aged under 31 years. Fifty-seven percent were wearing hearing protectors when the accident took place. CONCLUSION: According to these results, specific preventive programs were planned and should be assessed by epidemiological surveillance of exposed populations.
Noise attenuation of hearing protectors against heavy weapon noise.
This study evaluated the noise attenuation of earplugs and earmuffs or their combined use against heavy weapon noise in field conditions for military personnel. The noise attenuation was measured with a miniature microphone inserted into the ear canal. The subjects (13) were tested against pink noise and against the noise of explosions and bazooka, mortar, cannon, and howitzer. The attenuation (insertion loss) was 16 to 23 dB for earplugs, 10 to 20 dB for earmuffs, and 24 to 34 dB for the combined use of plugs and muffs. The transfer function of an open ear was 5 to 7 dB when measured as the C-weighted peak level. The combined use of earplugs and earmuffs gave smaller attenuation values than expected. If the limit for the C-weighted peak level is 140 dB for unprotected ears, then protection against low-frequency noise is provided for up to 156 dB by earplugs, up to 150 dB by earmuffs, and up to 165 dB by the combined use of plugs and muffs.
Dual protection.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.