SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Introns”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 451 records · Page 25Linked to original sources

PubMed2005

Can codon usage bias explain intron phase distributions and exon symmetry?

More introns exist between codons (phase 0) than between the first and the second bases (phase 1) or between the second and the third base (phase 2) within the codon. Many explanations have been suggested for this excess of phase 0. It has, for example, been argued to reflect an ancient utility for introns in separating exons that code for separate protein modules. There may, however, be a simple, alternative explanation. Introns typically require, for correct splicing, particular nucleotides immediately 5' in exons (typically a G) and immediately 3' in the following exon (also often a G). Introns therefore tend to be found between particular nucleotide pairs (e.g., G|G pairs) in the coding sequence. If, owing to bias in usage of different codons, these pairs are especially common at phase 0, then intron phase biases may have a trivial explanation. Here we take codon usage frequencies for a variety of eukaryotes and use these to generate random sequences. We then ask about the phase of putative intron insertion sites. Importantly, in all simulated data sets intron phase distribution is biased in favor of phase 0. In many cases the bias is of the magnitude observed in real data and can be attributed to codon usage bias. It is also known that exons may carry either the same phase (symmetric) or different phases (asymmetric) at the opposite ends. We simulated a distribution of different types of exons using frequencies of introns observed in real genes assuming random combination of intron phases at the opposite sides of exons. Surprisingly the simulated pattern was quite similar to that observed. In the simulants we typically observe a prevalence of symmetric exons carrying phase 0 at both ends, which is common for eukaryotic genes. However, at least in some species, the extent of the bias in favor of symmetric (0,0) exons is not as great in simulants as in real genes. These results emphasize the need to construct a biologically relevant null model of successful intron insertion.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

Intron dynamics and the evolution of integrin beta-subunit genes: maintenance of an ancestral gene structure in the coral, Acropora millepora.

We have determined the genomic structure of an integrin beta-subunit gene from the coral, Acropora millepora. The coding region of the gene contains 26 introns, spaced relatively uniformly, and this is significantly more than have been found in any integrin beta-subunit genes from higher animals. Twenty-five of the 26 coral introns are also found in a beta-subunit gene from at least one other phylum, indicating that the coral introns are ancestral. While there are some suggestions of intron gain or sliding, the predominant theme seen in the homologues from higher animals is extensive intron loss. The coral baseline allows one to infer that a number of introns found in only one phylum of higher animals result from frequent intron loss, as opposed to the seemingly more parsimonious alternative of isolated intron gain. The patterns of intron loss confirm results from protein sequences that most of the vertebrate genes, with the exception of beta4, belong to one of two beta subunit families. The similarity of the patterns within each of the beta1,2,7 and beta3,5,6,8 groups indicates that these gene structures have been very stable since early vertebrate evolution. Intron loss has been more extensive in the invertebrate genes, and obvious patterns have yet to emerge in this more limited data set.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed1991

Incipient mitochondrial evolution in yeasts. II. The complete sequence of the gene coding for cytochrome b in Saccharomyces douglasii reveals the presence of both new and conserved introns and discloses major differences in the fixation of mutations in evolution.

We have determined the complete sequence of the mitochondrial gene coding for cytochrome b in Saccharomyces douglasii. The gene is 6310 base-pairs long and is interrupted by four introns. The first one (1311 base-pairs) belongs to the group ID of secondary structure, contains a fragment open reading frame with a characteristic GIY ... YIG motif, is absent from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and is inserted in the same site in which introns 1 and 2 are inserted in Neurospora crassa and Podospora anserina, respectively. The next three S. douglasii introns are homologous to the first three introns of S. cerevisiae, are inserted at the same positions and display various degrees of similarity ranging from an almost complete identity (intron 2 and 4) to a moderate one (intron 3). We have compared secondary structures of intron RNAs, and nucleotide and amino acid sequences of cytochrome b exons and intron open reading frames in the two Saccharomyces species. The rules that govern fixation of mutations in exon and intron open reading frames are different: the relative proportion of mutations occurring in synonymous codons is low in some introns and high in exons. The overall frequency of mutations in cytochrome b exons is much smaller than in nuclear genes of yeasts, contrary to what has been found in vertebrates, where mitochondrial mutations are more frequent. The divergence of the cytochrome b gene is modular: various parts of the gene have changed with a different mode and tempo of evolution.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed1994

Two homologous introns from related Saccharomyces species differ in their mobility.

We have studied gene conversion initiated by the ai3 intron of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitochondrial (mt) COXI gene and its homologous intron (S.cap.ai1) from Saccharomyces capensis. The approach used involved the measurement of intron transmission amongst the progeny of crosses between constructed recipient and donor strains. We found that the S. cerevisiae ai3 intron is extremely active as a donor in gene conversion, whereas its homologous S. capensis intron is not. We have established the sequence of S.cap.ai1 and compared its open reading frame (ORF) with that of I-SceIII encoded by the homologous S. cerevisiae intron. The two protein-coding intron sequences are almost identical, except that the S. capensis ORF contains an in-frame stop codon. This finding provides a strong indication that the 3' part of the S. cerevisiae intron ORF encoding I-SceIII (which should not be translated in the S. capensis intron) must be critical for function of mtDNA endonucleases to mediate intron mobility.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2004

Use of computer-designed group II introns to disrupt Escherichia coli DExH/D-box protein and DNA helicase genes.

Mobile group II introns are site-specific retroelements that use a novel mobility mechanism in which the excised intron RNA inserts directly into a DNA target site and is then reverse transcribed by the associated intron-encoded protein. Because the DNA target site is recognized primarily by base-pairing of the intron RNA with only a small number of positions recognized by the protein, it has been possible to develop group II introns into a new type of gene targeting vector ("targetron"), which can be reprogrammed to insert into desired DNA targets simply by modifying the intron RNA. Here, we used databases of retargeted Lactococcus lactis Ll.LtrB group II introns and a compilation of nucleotide frequencies at active target sites to develop an algorithm that predicts optimal Ll.LtrB intron-insertion sites and designs primers for modifying the intron to insert into those sites. In a test of the algorithm, we designed one or two targetrons to disrupt each of 28 Escherichia coli genes encoding DExH/D-box and DNA helicase-related proteins and tested for the desired disruptants by PCR screening of 100 colonies. In 21 cases, we obtained disruptions at frequencies of 1-80% without selection, and in six other cases, where disruptants were not identified in the initial PCR screen, we readily obtained specific disruptions by using the same targetrons with a retrotransposition-activated selectable marker. Only one DExH/D-box protein gene, secA, which was known to be essential, did not give viable disruptants. The apparent dispensability of DExH/D-box proteins in E.coli contrasts with the situation in yeast, where the majority of such proteins are essential. The methods developed here should permit the rapid and efficient disruption of any bacterial gene, the computational analysis provides new insight into group II intron target site recognition, and the set of E.coli DExH/D-box protein and DNA helicase disruptants should be useful for analyzing the function of these proteins.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2006

Obligatory group I introns with unusual features at positions 1949 and 2449 in nuclear LSU rDNA of Didymiaceae myxomycetes.

Myxomycetes (plasmodial slime molds) belonging to the order Physarales contain obligatory group I introns at positions 1949 and 2449 in their large subunit ribosomal RNA gene. Here, we report 36 group I introns from the Didymiaceae family (order Physarales) from 18 isolates representing three genera and seven species, and have reconstructed both host and intron phylogenies. The introns, named L1949 and L2449, were found in all isolates analyzed, consistent with an obligatory distribution in Didymiaceae. The introns fold at the RNA-level into typical group I ribozyme core structures that are relatively conserved, but contain large and highly variable extension sequences in peripheral domains without any detectable protein coding capacities. Furthermore, the L1949 and L2449 introns have probably become dependent on host factors for folding or activity. This assumption is based on that all introns tested for self-splicing in vitro failed to ligate the flanking exon regions. Phylogenies based on LSU rDNA and intron sequences are consistent with that the L1949 and L2449 introns follow a strict vertical inheritance within Didymiaceae. We suggest that the Didymiaceae L1949 and L2449 introns are well suited as high-resolution markers in genetic assessments at various taxonomic levels, from closely related strains of a single species to separating genera.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Distribution of rRNA introns in the three-dimensional structure of the ribosome.

More than 1200 introns have been documented at over 150 unique sites in the small and large subunit ribosomal RNA genes (as of February 2002). Nearly all of these introns are assigned to one of four main types: group I, group II, archaeal and spliceosomal. This sequence information has been organized into a relational database that is accessible through the Comparative RNA Web Site (http://www.rna.icmb.utexas.edu/) While the rRNA introns are distributed across the entire tree of life, the majority of introns occur within a few phylogenetic groups. We analyzed the distributions of rRNA introns within the three-dimensional structures of the 30S and 50S ribosomes. Most sites in rRNA genes that contain introns contain only one type of intron. While the intron insertion sites occur at many different coordinates, the majority are clustered near conserved residues that form tRNA binding sites and the subunit interface. Contrary to our expectations, many of these positions are not accessible to solvent in the mature ribosome. The correlation between the frequency of intron insertions and proximity of the insertion site to functionally important residues suggests an association between intron evolution and rRNA function.

Introns↗

PubMed1986

Introns as relict retrotransposons: implications for the evolutionary origin of eukaryotic mRNA splicing mechanisms.

A model is presented for the evolutionary origin of intron sequences within eukaryotic protein-coding genes. We propose that introns are the vestiges of transposable elements and, specifically, that they represent a novel class of retrovirus-like transposons. The attraction of the retrotransposon model is that it gives the RNA splicing mechanism a central role in the evolution of introns. There is a growing body of evidence to suggest that several aspects of splicing are intron-encoded. Consequently, it is reasonable to look for evolutionary explanations of the splicing mechanism in the context of the evolution of the intron sequences themselves. According to this model the ancestral intron genomes were replicated into RNA copies simply because of their insertion within transcriptionally active regions of the host genome. Splicing was necessary not only to minimize their negative effects on host gene expression, but also, and perhaps more importantly, to generate new copies of the intron genome free of flanking exon sequences. These spliced intron copies were then available for reverse transcription and reinsertion elsewhere in the genome. Thus, splicing can be seen as an essential step in the intron replication cycle. Most modern introns have probably lost the majority of their original genetic content and may be considered as degenerate evolutionary relicts. An exception to this degeneracy is the set of splicing signals which must be retained because of its continued importance to host cell survival.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Biological Evolution↗

PubMed2003

Importance of a single base pair for discrimination between intron-containing and intronless alleles by endonuclease I-BmoI.

Homing endonucleases initiate mobility of their host group I introns by binding to and cleaving lengthy recognition sequences that are typically centered on the intron insertion site (IS) of intronless alleles. Because the intron interrupts the endonucleases' recognition sequence, intron-containing alleles are immune to cleavage by their own endonuclease. I-TevI and I-BmoI are related GIY-YIG endonucleases that bind a homologous stretch of thymidylate synthase (TS)-encoding DNA but use different strategies to distinguish intronless from intron-containing substrates. I-TevI discriminates between substrates at the level of DNA binding, as its recognition sequence is centered on the intron IS. I-BmoI, in contrast, possesses a very asymmetric recognition sequence with respect to the intron IS, binds both intron-containing and intronless TS-encoding substrates, but efficiently cleaves only intronless substrate. Here, we show that I-BmoI is extremely tolerant of multiple substitutions around its cleavage sites and has a low specific activity. However, a single G-C base pair, at position -2 of a 39-base pair recognition sequence, is a major determinant for cleavage efficiency and distinguishes intronless from intron-containing alleles. Strikingly, this G-C base pair is universally conserved in phylogenetically diverse TS-coding sequences; this finding suggests that I-BmoI has evolved exquisite cleavage requirements to maximize the potential to spread to variant intronless alleles, while minimizing cleavage at its own intron-containing allele.

Alleles↗

PubMed2002

Requirements for intron-mediated enhancement of gene expression in Arabidopsis.

To explore possible mechanisms of intron-mediated enhancement of gene expression, the features of PAT1 intron 1 required to elevate mRNA accumulation were systematically tested in transgenic Arabidopsis. This intron is remarkably resilient, retaining some ability to increase mRNA accumulation when splicing was prevented by mutation of 5' and 3' splice sites, branchpoint sequences, or when intron U-richness was reduced. Enhancement was abolished by simultaneously eliminating branchpoints and the 5' splice site, structures involved in the first two steps of spliceosome assembly. Although this suggests that the splicing machinery is required, intron splicing is clearly not enough to enhance mRNA accumulation. Five other introns were all efficiently spliced but varied widely in their ability to increase mRNA levels. Furthermore, PAT1 intron 1 was spliced but lost the ability to elevate mRNA accumulation when moved to the 3' UTR. These findings demonstrate that splicing per se is neither necessary nor sufficient for an intron to enhance mRNA accumulation, and suggest a mechanism that requires intron recognition by the splicing machinery but also involves nonconserved intron sequences.

Arabidopsis↗

PubMed1999

RNA and protein catalysis in group II intron splicing and mobility reactions using purified components.

Group II introns encode proteins with reverse transcriptase activity. These proteins also promote RNA splicing (maturase activity) and then, with the excised intron, form a site-specific DNA endonuclease that promotes intron mobility by reverse splicing into DNA followed by target DNA-primed reverse transcription. Here, we used an Escherichia coli expression system for the Lactococcus lactis group II intron Ll.LtrB to show that the intron-encoded protein (LtrA) alone is sufficient for maturase activity, and that RNP particles containing only the LtrA protein and excised intron RNA have site-specific DNA endonuclease and target DNA-primed reverse transcriptase activity. Detailed analysis of the splicing reaction indicates that LtrA is an intron-specific splicing factor that binds to unspliced precursor RNA with a K(d) of </=0.12 pM at 30 degrees C. This binding occurs in a rapid bimolecular reaction, which is followed by a slower step, presumably an RNA conformational change, required for splicing to occur. Our results constitute the first biochemical analysis of protein-dependent splicing of a group II intron and demonstrate that a single intron-encoded protein can interact with the intron RNA to carry out a coordinated series of reactions leading to splicing and mobility.

Bacterial Proteins↗

PubMed1991

Integration of a group I intron into a ribosomal RNA sequence promoted by a tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase.

Group I and II introns are mobile elements that propagate by insertion into different genes. Some introns of both types self-splice in vitro by transesterification reactions catalysed by the intron RNA. These transesterifications are reversible, and it has been suggested that reverse splicing followed by reverse transcription and recombination with genomic DNA may be a mechanism for intron transposition. In vivo the splicing of many, if not all, group I and II introns requires protein factors, which may facilitate correct folding of the intron RNAs. Here we show that the Neurospora mitochondrial large rRNA intron, a group I intron that is not self-splicing in vitro, undergoes reverse splicing in a reaction promoted by the CYT-18 protein, the Neurospora mitochondrial tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase, which is required for splicing the intron in vivo. In contrast to known RNA-catalysed reverse splicing reactions, this protein-assisted reverse splicing is sufficiently rapid to compete with forward splicing at low RNA concentrations under physiologically relevant conditions, including high GTP and low Mg2+ concentrations. Our results indicate that proteins that promote splicing could contribute to intron mobility by promoting reverse splicing in vivo.

Base Sequence↗

PubMed1998

Characterization and splicing in vivo of a Sinorhizobium meliloti group II intron associated with particular insertion sequences of the IS630-Tc1/IS3 retroposon superfamily.

By sequence analysis of Sinorhizobium meliloti strain GR4 plasmid pRmeGR4b, we have identified a group II intron named RmInt1 inserted within the insertion sequence ISRm2011-2 of the IS630-Tc1/IS3 retroposon superfamily. Like some other group II introns, RmInt1 possesses, in addition to the structurally conserved ribozyme core, an open reading frame (ORF) with homology to reverse transcriptases. Using a T7 expression system in Escherichia coli, we show that the intron is active in splicing in vivo and that splicing efficiency requires the intron-encoded ORF, which suggests that the putative intron encoded protein has a maturase function. DNA hybridization studies indicate that intron RmInt1 is widespread within S. meliloti native populations and appears to be mostly located within this IS element. Nevertheless, some S. meliloti strains harbour one copy of RmInt1 at a different location. DNA sequence analysis of the 5' exon of one of these heterologous intron insertion sites revealed the presence of a putative IS element closely related to insertion sequence ISRm2011-2. The intron-binding sites (IBS1 and IBS2 motifs) are conserved, although a transition of a G-->A in the IBS1 has occurred. Our results demonstrate an association of intron RmInt1 with particular insertion sequences of the IS630-Tc1/IS3 retroposon superfamily that may have ensured the spread and maintenance of this group II intron in S. meliloti.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed1993

Expression of maize Adh1 intron mutants in tobacco nuclei.

In vivo and in vitro gene transfer experiments have suggested that the elements mediating intron recognition differ in mammalian, yeast and plant nuclei. Differences in the sequence dependencies, which also exist between dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous nuclei, have prevented some monocot introns from being spliced in dicot nuclei. To locate elements which modulate efficient recognition of introns in dicot nuclei, the maize Adh1 gene has been expressed in full-length and single intron constructs in Nicotiana benthamiana nuclei using an autonomously replicating plant expression vector. Quantitative PCR-Southern analyses indicate that the inefficient splicing of the maize Adh1 intron 1 (57% AU) in these dicot nuclei can be dramatically enhanced by increasing the degree of U1 snRNA complementarity at the 5' splice site. This indicates that the 5' splice site plays a significant role in defining the splicing efficiency of an intron in dicot nuclei and that, most importantly, the remainder of this monocot intron contains no elements which inhibit its accurate recognition in dicot nuclei. Deletions in intron 3 (66% AU) which effectively move the 3' boundary between AU-rich intron and GC-rich exon sequences strongly activate a cryptic upstream splice site; those which do not reposition this boundary activate a downstream cryptic splice site. This suggests that 3' splice site selection in dicot nuclei is extremely flexible and not dependent on strict sequence requirements but rather on the transition points between introns and exons. Our results are consistent with a model in which potential splice sites are selected if they are located upstream (5' splice site) or downstream (3' splice site) of AU transition points and not if they are embedded within AU-rich sequences.

Alcohol Dehydrogenase↗

PubMed1997

A combinatorial role for exon, intron and splice site sequences in splicing in maize.

Plant introns are typically AU-rich or U-rich, and this feature has been shown to be important for splicing. In maize, however, about 20% of the introns exceed 50% GC, and most of them are efficiently spliced. A series of constructs has been designed to analyze the cis requirements for splicing of the GC-rich Bz2 maize intron and two other GC-rich intron derivatives. By manipulating exon, intron and splice site sequences it is shown that exons can play an important role in intron definition: changes in exon sequences can increase splicing efficiency of a GC-rich intron from 17% to 86%. The relative difference, or base compositional contrast, in GC and U content between exon and intron sequences in the vicinity of splice sites, rather than the absolute base-content of the intron or exons, correlates with splicing efficiency. It is also shown that GC-rich intron constructs that are poorly spliced can be partially rescued by an improved 3' splice site.

Base Sequence↗

PubMed2002

Characterization of the self-splicing products of two complex Naegleria LSU rDNA group I introns containing homing endonuclease genes.

The two group I introns Nae.L1926 and Nmo.L2563, found at two different sites in nuclear LSU rRNA genes of Naegleria amoebo-flagellates, have been characterized in vitro. Their structural organization is related to that of the mobile Physarum intron Ppo.L1925 (PpLSU3) with ORFs extending the L1-loop of a typical group IC1 ribozyme. Nae.L1926, Nmo.L2563 and Ppo.L1925 RNAs all self-splice in vitro, generating ligated exons and full-length intron circles as well as internal processed excised intron RNAs. Formation of full-length intron circles is found to be a general feature in RNA processing of ORF-containing nuclear group I introns. Both Naegleria LSU rDNA introns contain a conserved polyadenylation signal at exactly the same position in the 3' end of the ORFs close to the internal processing sites, indicating an RNA polymerase II-like expression pathway of intron proteins in vivo. The intron proteins I-NaeI and I-NmoI encoded by Nae.L1926 and Nmo.L2563, respectively, correspond to His-Cys homing endonucleases of 148 and 175 amino acids. I-NaeI contains an additional sequence motif homologous to the unusual DNA binding motif of three antiparallel beta sheets found in the I-PpoI endonuclease, the product of the Ppo.L1925 intron ORF.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2003

A bacterial group II intron favors retrotransposition into plasmid targets.

Group II introns, widely believed to be the ancestors of nuclear pre-mRNA introns, are catalytic RNAs found in bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes. They are mobile genetic elements that move via an RNA intermediate. They retrohome to intronless alleles and retrotranspose to ectopic sites, aided by an intron-encoded protein with reverse transcriptase, maturase, and endonuclease activities. Many group II introns identified in bacteria reside on plasmid genomes rather than bacterial chromosomes, implying that plasmids are havens for these retroelements. This study demonstrates that almost one-fourth of retrotransposition events of the Ll.LtrB intron in Lactococcus lactis are into the plasmid donor. This level is more than twice that predicted based on target size and plasmid copy number relative to the chromosome. In particular, the fraction of such plasmid targeting events was elevated to more than one-third of retrotransposition events by mutation of the intron-encoded endonuclease, a situation that may resemble most bacterial group II introns, which lack the endonuclease. Target-site sequences on the plasmid are more relaxed than those on the chromosome, likely accounting for preferred integration into plasmid replicons. Furthermore, the direction of integration relative to promoters and origins of replication is consistent with group II intron retrotransposition into single-stranded DNA at replication forks. This work provides mechanistic rationales for the prevalence of group II introns in natural plasmid populations and underscores that targeting to plasmids, which are themselves mobile elements, could promote intron spread.

Base Sequence↗

PubMed1988

Intron conservation across the prokaryote-eukaryote boundary: structure of the nuclear gene for chloroplast glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase from maize.

The nuclear gene encoding chloroplast glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) from maize has been cloned and sequenced. The gene is G + C rich in its coding sequences and, in addition, contains a CpG-rich region surrounding the promoter. Further upstream several enhancer-like repetitions have been identified that may control the light- and phytochrome-mediated expression of this gene. The gene is interrupted by three introns. Introns 1 and 2 are located within the sequence encoding the transit peptide, dividing it into three parts, each containing one of the three major homology blocks typical for transit peptides of nucleus-encoded chloroplast proteins. Intron 3 is located at codon 166 (glycine) at the same nucleotide position as intron 1 in the GAPDH gene from the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, suggesting that this intron was present in the parental GAPDH gene from which these two modern descendants originated. Intron 3 divides the GAPDH protein into its two constituent domains, the NAD-binding and the catalytic domain, immediately after helix alpha 1 at a position homologous to that of intron 9 in the gene for maize alcohol dehydrogenase, thereby confirming the prediction of Brändén et al. on the basis of gene-protein structure correlations in maize alcohol dehydrogenase for the placement of introns in the GAPDH gene [Brändén, C.I., Eklund, H., Cambillau, C. & Pryor, A.J. (1984) EMBO J. 3, 1307-1310]. These results suggest that intron 3 is an archetypical relic of early GAPDH and alcohol dehydrogenase evolution, whereas introns 1 and 2 were implicated in the evolution of chloroplast transit peptides.

Amino Acid Sequence↗