PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Language Development”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 451 records · Page 25Linked to original sources

Effectiveness of Caregiver-Mediated Spoken Language Interventions for Children Under Five at Risk of Developmental Language Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Caregiver-mediated interventions are commonly used by Speech and Language Therapists to support early language development. Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) is associated with reduced quality of life throughout the lifespan. Understanding factors that predict intervention success is essential for developing appropriate, cost-effective therapy provision for the approximately 12% of preschool children who present with early markers for Developmental Language Disorder (DLD). This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of caregiver-mediated spoken language interventions for under-fives at risk of DLD, and factors influencing intervention effectiveness. METHODS: A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted. Five electronic databases were searched to identify experimental studies comparing caregiver-mediated spoken language interventions to control conditions in under-fives presenting with risk factors for DLD. Risk factors included prematurity, socioeconomic factors, caregiver language development concerns, and formal or informal language screening or assessment scores. Twenty-six experimental studies with 1407 child participants were included in qualitative synthesis. Meta-analysis was performed on nine Randomised Controlled Trials involving 947 children. RESULTS: Effectiveness was examined for outcomes including child language gains, child wellbeing, inclusion and attainment. Meta-analysis indicated a significant effect of caregiver-mediated spoken language interventions on language outcomes compared to treatment-as-usual, non-language intervention or waitlist control conditions. Non-language outcomes were evaluated via qualitative synthesis. Interventions significantly improved language development trajectories for under-fives presenting with risk factors or early markers for DLD. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: This review contributes to the growing evidence base demonstrating that caregiver-mediated interventions can positively impact language development and wellbeing outcomes for children under five at risk of DLD. These findings support the implementation of caregiver-mediated environmental language interventions in clinical practice to maximise accessibility and cost-effectiveness while delivering optimal outcomes for vulnerable populations. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on this subject Previous research on caregiver-mediated spoken language interventions has highlighted gaps in the evidence regarding the impact of risk factors, demographic characteristics, dosage and intervention components on child language outcomes. Developmental Language Disorder has relatively high population prevalence, estimated at 7%. Prevalence is associated with risk factors including low household socioeconomic status (SES), prematurity and late language emergence. In contrast to its prevalence, there is low public and professional awareness of DLD and a low diagnostic rate. Therefore, a strengthened evidence base and additional insights into the factors affecting success of family-based interventions is important in order to increase the effectiveness of service provision and care planning for this underserved population. Timely and effective intervention with young children presenting with early markers for DLD has the potential to offer lifelong improvement to their wellbeing, inclusion and attainment outcomes. Recent systematic reviews of the effectiveness of caregiver-mediated language interventions had differences in population age range and diagnostic inclusion criteria. What this paper adds to existing knowledge Our review examines the effectiveness of caregiver-mediated early spoken language interventions on child language, attainment and wellbeing, and on caregiver self-efficacy and adherence to language support strategies. Our population was children under five presenting with risk factors for Developmental Language Disorder, in the absence of other neurodevelopmental or genetic conditions such as intellectual disability or autism. This review adds depth and detail to the evidence base supporting the effectiveness of caregiver-mediated spoken language interventions in improving outcomes for this population of young children, and factors that influence their success. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The high prevalence of Developmental Language Disorder, estimated at around 7% of the population, and the strong association with risk factors including low SES, prematurity and late language emergence, coupled with the low awareness of DLD and low diagnostic rate, mean that a strengthened evidence base and additional insights into the factors affecting success of family-based interventions can increase the effectiveness of service provision and care planning for this population. Timely and effective intervention in this group of young children has the potential to improve wellbeing and attainment outcomes across the lifespan. This review contributes to our understanding of how to implement cost-effective, socially valid and maximally engaging partnership working with families of young children at risk for DLD.

Humans↗

Influence of certain language and communication environments in early childhood on the development of language in deaf individuals.

Four groups of deaf subjects between the age of 10-0 and 18-11 years were tested, employing the Test of Syntactic Ability, and the language subtests of the Stanford Achievement Test, in a study of the influence of early language and communication environment on later syntactic language ability. The groups, 18 subjects in each, were dichotomized by whether the parents were hearing or deaf and further subgrouped by the language ability of the parents if the parents were deaf, and by the amount and intensity of oral preschool training provided by the parents if the parents were hearing. The groups were labeled by the type of language used with them in infancy and early childhood: manual English, average manual, intensive oral, and average oral. Results showed significant superiority of the manual English group over the two oral groups on five of the six major test structures of the Test of Syntactic Ability. On the Stanford Achievement Test, the manual English group performed significantly better than the other three groups on all four subtests. The two manual groups performed significantly better than the two oral groups on every test measure employed.

Achievement↗

[A longitudinal study of three-year-old children with delayed development of language].

UNLABELLED: From January 1982 to December 1986, 113 three-year-old children (100 boys and 13 girls) visited the department of pediatrics, Asahikawa Medical College, because of delayed development of language (their expressive language age less than two-year-old). Of these children, 102 children (90%) have visited until they graduated from junior high school for the evaluation of intelligence quotient (IQ), diagnosis, the type of attended school and complications. The mean follow-up period was 10.8 years. The 113 children ware classified as 32 cases of developmental language disorder (DLD), 38 of autistic disorder (Au), 39 of mental retardation (MR), and 4 of deafness based on the results of clinical examination (DSM-III-R), ABR and WPPSI/WISC-R. The purpose of this study is to compare the assessment of language development at the age 3 with the prognosis for intelligence, academic achievement and behavioral adjustment. At the age of three, we divided them into three groups using the Enjoji shiki hattatsu kensa-hyo. Group A including 31 children (29 boys and 2 girls) means delayed development in verbal expression only. Group B including 23 children (17 boys and 6 girls) means delayed development in verbal expression and comprehension. Group C including 59 children (54 boys and 5 girls) means delayed development not only in verbal expression and comprehension but also in communication skills. RESULTS: ABR: Four (2 boys and 2 girls) of 113 children did not show any significant waves on ABR at aged 3, and were also diagnosed as deafness by another audiometry. Comparison between the assessment of verbal expression at aged 3 and full scale IQ (FSIQ): FSIQs in 77% of group A were more than 70, while FSIQs in 79% of groups B and C were 70 or below. The assessment of verbal comprehension at aged 3 was significantly related with FSIQ (x2 = 23.88, p < 0.01). Classification of disorders and type of schools according to the assessment at aged 3: [Group A] Thirty one children were classified as 25 cases of DLD and 6 of MR. Before a graduation from junior high school, 20 children attended regular classes and 8 attended special classes for MR. [Group B] Twenty three children were classified as 4 cases of DLD, 10 of MR, 5 of Au and 4 of deafness. Before a graduation from junior high school, 4 children attended regular classes, 8 attended special classes for MR, 6 attended special schools for MR and 4 attended schools for deafness. [Group C] Fifty nine children were classified as 3 cases of DLD, 23 of MR and 33 of Au. Before graduating from junior high school, 10 children attended regular classes, 18 attended special classes for MR, 19 attended special schools for MR and 2 entered educational facilities. CONCLUSION: 1. Poor mental outcome could be predicted by delayed development of both expressive and comprehensive language, particularly associated with dysfunction of communication skills at the age of three. 2. ABR is a useful method for detecting of hearing loss in non-cooperative young children with delayed development of language.

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity↗

Hearing and the development of language and speech.

The criticality of hearing is discussed in relation to language and speech development in children. The fundamentals for such development, the significant milestones in normal language and speech acquisition, and a delineation of the deleterious effects of significant hearing loss on the development of expressive and receptive oral communication are presented.

Child↗

Subject case marking and verb morphology in normally developing and specifically language-impaired children.

Recent theories of language development propose a direct relationship between children's use of verb morphology and their use of subject case pronouns. Such proposals might contribute to an understanding of specifically language-impaired (SLI) children's difficulties. These children's extraordinary problems with verb morphology are well documented, and preliminary evidence indicates frequent pronoun case errors (e.g., her for she) in their speech. Thus, it is possible that a collection of difficulties may be linked to a common source in these children. The objectives of this study were to determine: (a) whether subject case marking, as well as verb morphology was more limited in the speech of a group of SLI children than in the speech of a younger group of normally developing (ND) children matched for mean utterance length; (b) whether a relationship between the use of subject case marking and the use of verb morphology existed in the speech of the ND children; and, if so, (c) whether this relationship is evident in the SLI children as well, in spite of their more limited use of these features. The results revealed that the SLI children were more limited than the ND children in the use of both subject case marking and verb morphology. However, a relationship between the two types of usage was found in both groups of children.

Child Language↗