PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Neoadjuvant therapy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 451 records · Page 25Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy Improves the Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Radioactive Seed Implantation for Localized Prostate Cancer.

Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) has been extensively studied in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and external-beam irradiation for prostate cancer. While there are a few reports in the literature on its use in men undergoing brachytherapy, little information exists about its beneficial effects in such patients. In this report, we describe the effects of NHT on prostate volume (PV) prior to seed implantation and on the prostate specific antigen (PSA) and postimplant biopsy outcomes of patients who presented with high-risk features. Hormone therapy (leuprolide and flutamide 750 mg/day) was given to 145 patients for 3 months prior to and for 3 months after permanent iodine-125 (160 Gy) or palladium-103 (115 Gy) seed implantation. Of these, 28 (19%) received NHT because of a preimplant PV >50 cc, and 117 patients received NHT because they had a PSA >10 ng/mL, Gleason score >/=7, or clinical stage >/=T(2b). All patients underwent implantation using the real-time intraoperative method, and no patients received external-beam irradiation. Of the 145 patients treated, 67 (46%) had a PSA >10 ng/mL (range 1.9-57 ng/mL; mean 12.2 ng/mL), 50 (35%) had Gleason score >/=7, and 80 (55%) had stage >/=T(2b) disease. Prostate volume was measured in 106 patients prior to NHT and 3 months later immediately prior to the seed implant. The mean PV was 50.4 cc (range 17-150 cc), whereas the mean PV after NHT was 31 cc (range 11.7-73.7 cc). The mean PV reduction was 35% (range 2%-62%). Volume reduction was compared in those patients who presented with a PV <40 cc (N = 51) and those with a PV >/=40 cc (N = 56). The mean reduction for the smaller glands was 29% (range 2%-54%) compared with 41% (range 7%-62%) for the larger glands (P < 0.05). Patients were followed for a minimum of 1 year (range 1.0-6.4; mean 2.2 years). The 4-year actuarial rate of freedom from PSA failure (PSA >1.0 ng/mL with two consecutive elevations) was 85%. There was no difference in rates of freedom from PSA failure for those with initial Gleason 2-4 (96%), 5-6 (78%), 7 (80%), or 8-9 (83%; P = 0.5). Control rates were 85% for patients with PSA </=10 ng/mL, 82% for patients with PSA 10 to 20 ng/mL, and 88% for patients with PSA >20 ng/mL (P = 0.8). There was a trend to decreased control rates with higher-stage disease (98% for T(1)-T(2a) v 68% for T(2c)), but these differences were likewise not significant (P = 0.12). The control rates for the 28 low-risk patients with enlarged prostate glands were compared with those of the 117 with high-risk features and were not different (100% v 82%; P = 0.1). There were 62 patients who agreed to eight-core prostate biopsies 2 years after implantation, and 60 (97%) were negative for tumor. This trial shows that NHT can reduce PV an average of 35% prior to seed implantation with the greatest reduction found in patients with larger prostates (41%). Hormonal therapy also appears to improve biochemical (PSA) control and local control (prostate biopsy) in patients with high-risk disease, yielding results similar to those in men with low-risk prostate cancer.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1995

The potential for normal tissue dose reduction with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy in conformal treatment planning for stage C prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Preirradiation hormonal cytoreduction of prostate cancer has been proven to reduce exposure of normal structures by decreasing the size of the target volume. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis, however, does not always appear to demonstrate a strong positive benefit with the use of neoadjuvant hormone therapy. This study analyzes various other factors influencing dose to normal organs, which may determine the success or failure of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy in achieving its goals. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with bulky clinical Stage C adenocarcinoma of the prostate were given 3 months of hormone treatment consisting of oral Flutamide and monthly Zoladex injections prior to irradiation. Computerized tomography (CT) scans of the pelvis were obtained both prior to and following hormonal treatment. Treatment plans were generated by three-dimensional (3D) conformal treatment planning. The change in the volume of the prostate was assessed along with the percentage of prescribed dose delivered to the rectum and bladder. Various factors such as prostate size, bladder/rectum size, and organ shape were studied. Both dose-volume histograms (DVH) and dose-surface area histograms (DSH) were used for analysis. RESULTS: Six of seven patients had reduction in the size of their prostates. The mean volumes of the prostate before and after hormonal manipulation were 129.1 +/- 32.9 standard deviation (SD) cm3 and 73.0 +/- 29.5 SD cm3, respectively (p = 0.0059). The volume of rectum receiving 80% of the prescribed dose was reduced in five of seven patients from a mean of 83.2 to 59.9 cm3 (p = 0.045). The volume of bladder receiving 80% of the prescribed dose was also reduced in five out of seven patients from a mean of 74.5 to 40.2 cm3 (p = 0.098). Correlation between the size of the prostate and volume of rectum and bladder treated was not always consistent: greater reduction in prostate size did not necessarily result in large decreases in dose to bladder or rectum. The total size of the bladder and rectum were found to be important factors in normal tissue radiation exposure; the benefits of hormone therapy may be lost if the bladder and rectum are allowed to decrease in size. Also, the bladder may be prone to sagging into the pelvis of some patients following hormone therapy, resulting in a less optimal therapeutic ratio. CONCLUSION: Reduction in prostate size by neoadjuvant hormonal manipulation does decrease the amount of normal tissue irradiated in most patients. However, the correlation between the reduction in prostate size and amount of rectum or bladder treated is not linear if other variables are not controlled. Factors such as the shape of the organs, as well as the distensible nature of the bladder and rectum, play major roles in dose to normal tissues. These facts may mask the benefits of cytoreduction and could be obstacles in realizing consistent benefits from preirradiation hormonal treatment in the clinical setting if they are ignored.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1997

Neuroendocrine cells in the prostatic carcinomas after neoadjuvant hormonal therapy.

Prostate cancer is a malignant tumor that is likely to increase in incidence in Japan. The most troublesome facet of this tumor is its conversion from a hormone-sensitive status to an insensitive one. Neuroendocrine differentiation may help explain this phenomenon. We studied the prevalence of neuroendocrine cells in prostate carcinoma after androgen ablation therapy. Radical prostatectomy specimens from 28 patients who had undergone neoadjuvant endocrine therapy with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue were retrospectively studied. Immunohistochemical staining was used to assess the localization of neuroendocrine cells. Neuroendocrine differentiation index, defined as the sum of the immunoreactivity scores of the specimens against anti-chromogranin A and anti-neuron specific enolase antibodies, was developed. Overall, 46.4% and 53.6% of the prostate carcinomas contained chromogranin A and neuron-specific enolase positive cells, respectively. Localization of these neuroendocrine cells in tumors was patchy. Two specific types of neuroendocrine cells were identified: a closed type and an open type based on the location of the neuroendocrine cells. The neuroendocrine differentiation index correlated with tumor grade, but not with tumor stage. The prevalence of neuroendocrine cells in higher grade prostatic carcinoma may help to explain the insensitivity of these cancers to hormonal therapy.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2001

Long-term results of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy prior to radical prostatectomy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: biochemical and pathological effects.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term biochemical and pathological effects induced by neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) in patients with clinically localized disease. Between March 1993 and May 1997, 24 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer received NHT for 3 to 11 months (median: 5 months) using luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue prior to radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. The clinical stage was T1 in 1 patient, T2 in 17 and T3 in 6, the pretreatment serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value was < or = 10 ng/ml in 5 patients, 10 to 20 ng/ml in 4 and > 20 ng/ml in 15 (mean: 34.7 micrograms/l), and the Gleason score was < or = 4 in 9 patients, 5 to 7 in 11 and > 8 in 3. The mean prostate specific antigen (PSA) value 3 months after NHT had reduced below 2 ng/ml in 18 of the 24 patients (67%), and finally decreased by an average of 95% (i.e., 1.9 ng/ml) prior to surgery. The pathological stage was pT0 in 2 patients, pT2 in 10 and pT3 in 12. The incidence of organ-confined disease (OCD) was significantly higher in patients with clinical stage T1 or T2a than with T2b or T3, with pretreatment PSA values < or = 10 ng/ml than with PSA values > 10 ng/ml, and with PSA values < or = 2 than with PSA values > 2 at 3 months after NHT; in contrast, the Gleason score had no significant impact on the rate of OCD. After a median follow-up of 49 months (range 34 to 85 months), 6 patients (25%) had a recurrence evidenced by rising PSA, and the 3-year recurrence-free survival rate was 79%. These results suggest that NHT appears not to be of significant additional benefit to patients who have a higher clinical T stage, higher pretreatment PSA values and/or in patients whose PSA values do not normalize early in the treatment process.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Axillary lymph node scarring and the association with tumour response following neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy for breast cancer.

We observed that the axillary lymph nodes of some of our breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy (NCT) showed evidence of scarring. The purpose of this study is to determine whether such scarring exists and, if so, whether it is confined to neoadjuvant patients and may be related to response to therapy of the primary tumour. We examined the axillary lymph nodes of a consecutive series of 255 breast cancer patients, all of whom had undergone radical axillary dissection. Fifty-three had received NCT; the remainder formed the control group. A scar was defined as an area of cellular fibrous tissue >0.25 mm in diameter and for each patient scar count, median size and score were recorded. Nodes with scars were stained immunohistochemically (IHC) with 2 epithelial markers for the presence of occult micrometastases. The nodes of 20.7% of patients who had received NCT contained scars compared with 13.4% of controls. The median scar size was significantly greater in neoadjuvant patients (P<0.001) and within this group scar count and score were significantly higher (P=0.026 and 0.020) in those with no or minimal evidence of residual primary tumour. Scars which were IHC-positive for micrometastases were almost exclusively confined to neoadjuvant patients. Our results suggest that axillary lymph node scarring does exist, but is not a common phenomenon. It is more significant in neoadjuvant patients and within this group is most marked in those with the greatest primary tumour response to therapy. We believe that scarring is likely to represent downstaging of axillary disease. A prospective study involving a larger group of patients receiving NCT is indicated, to confirm these preliminary findings and establish whether scarring has prognostic or predictive potential.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2005

Relationship between changes in prostate cancer cell proliferation, apoptotic index, and expression of apoptosis-related proteins by neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and duration of such treatment.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationships between changes in the carcinoma cell proliferation index, apoptotic index (AI), and apoptosis-related factors, including bcl-2 and bax, after different durations of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) in prostate cancer tissue. METHODS: Pre- and post-NHT specimens were obtained from 42 patients who had undergone NHT and radical prostatectomy. The patients were divided into two groups according to the duration of NHT: group 1 (3 to 7 months, n = 21) and group 2 (8 to 12 months, n = 21; no randomization). Immunohistochemistry was used to determine the expression of bcl-2 and bax and to determine the proliferation index, and the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated nick end-labeling method was used to assess apoptosis and determine the AI. RESULTS: The median proliferation indexes of groups 1 (1.8%) and 2 (1.6%) were significantly lower than the respective values in the pre-NHT specimens (4.9%, P < 0.01). The median AI of group 1 (2.5%) was greater than in the pre-NHT specimens (1.4%). In addition, the post/pre-NHT AI ratio correlated significantly with the duration of NHT in group 1 (r = 0.58, P < 0.01), but not in group 2. Bax expression increased in a manner parallel to that of the AI. CONCLUSIONS: NHT suppresses prostate cancer cell proliferation for 3 to 12 months. Although the AI was increased during 3 to 7 months of NHT, no significant difference was found between the pre-NHT levels and those after 8 to 12 months. Our results support the current belief that the optimal duration of NHT is longer than 3 months.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2005

Neoadjuvant hormone therapy and external-beam radiation for localized high-risk prostate cancer: the importance of PSA nadir before radiation.

PURPOSE: To examine the impact of various patient, disease, and treatment characteristics on outcome in patients treated with neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NAHT) and external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for clinically localized, high-risk prostate adenocarcinoma (initial prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level >20, Gleason score 8-10 or Stage > or = T3). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on 407 patients treated between 1991 and 2001 with NAHT and EBRT for high-risk prostate cancer. The effect of tumor (PSA level, Gleason score, and T stage) and treatment (NAHT duration, total-hormone duration, preradiation PSA) characteristics on rates of biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS), prostate cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were examined. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 78 months (range: 5-140 months). Actuarial bDFS at 5 years was 52% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46% to 57%) for the entire group. On multivariate analysis, initial PSA level (p = 0.004), Gleason score (p = 0.005), and preradiation PSA level (p < 0.001) were predictive of bDFS, whereas age, T stage, duration of NAHT, and duration of total hormone therapy were not predictive of outcomes. Gleason score and preradiation PSA level were also predictive of prostate cancer-specific survival rates. CONCLUSION: Improved bDFS in patients with high-risk prostate cancer was associated with lower initial PSA level, lower Gleason score, and lower preradiation PSA level. The duration of NAHT did not have an impact on outcomes, but the preradiation PSA was an important predictor of bDFS in high-risk patients.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Neoadjuvant hormone therapy and radical radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: poorer biochemical outcome using flutamide alone.

Since a recent meta-analysis of non-steroidal anti-androgen therapy in metastatic prostate cancer concluded that survival was worse compared with medical or surgical androgen withdrawal, we analyzed our experience with flutamide monotherapy and other forms of neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NHT) prior to radiation therapy in clinically localized prostate cancer. A total of 45 patients received flutamide and 328 patients received other NHT. Flutamide patients had higher PSA levels at diagnosis and shorter duration of treatment, which could bias the results against flutamide monotherapy. Kaplan Meier analysis of PSA -- disease free survival showed significantly poorer outcome with flutamide monotherapy. Multivariate analysis supported this conclusion. Until equivalence to other forms of NHT is shown, we do not recommend flutamide monotherapy prior to radical radiation. A prospective randomized trial would be necessary to confirm this conclusion.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1999

Circulating prostate-specific antigen mRNA during radical prostatectomy in patients with localized prostate cancer: with special reference to neoadjuvant hormonal therapy.

To determine the potential risk of hematogenous dissemination of prostate cancer cells during radical prostatectomy (RP), we investigated the pre- and intraoperative circulating prostate-specific antigen (PSA) mRNA in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer, with special reference to neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT). Using a nested reverse transcriptase (RT) polymerase reaction (PCR) assay, PSA mRNA in the peripheral blood was evaluated pre- and postoperatively in a total of 23 patients, 10 of whom received NHT with antiandrogens. The RT-PCR assay employed detected one LNCaP cell in 10(7) mononuclear blood cells, and showed no positive signal in the blood samples from all 15 healthy controls. Pre- and intraoperative circulating PSA mRNA was positive in 11 (48%) and 18 patients (78%), respectively. All 11 patients with positive preoperative PSA mRNA continued to be positive during RP, and seven (58%) of 12 patients with negative preoperative PSA mRNA had a positive conversion. Although the patients' ages, preoperative serum PSA values and clinical or pathological stages were not associated with the pre- and intraoperative PSA mRNA results, the NHT group showed a significantly lower incidence of preoperative PSA mRNA positivity (2/10) than the group receiving RP alone (9/13) (20% vs 69%, P = 0.036). NHT, however, showed no suppressive effect on either intraoperative positivity or positive conversion of circulating PSA mRNA. The present study suggests that a substantial number of patients receiving RP are at risk of hematogenous dissemination, and NHT with antiandrogens has a minimal or no suppressive effect on the circulating PSA mRNA during surgical manipulation of the prostate. Because the clinical significance of circulating cancer cells remains to be determined, long-term follow-up in association with the circulating cancer cells assessed by the RT-PCR is essential in order to establish the role of molecular staging as well as NHT.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy and Radical Prostatectomy for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer.

The management of locally advanced prostate cancer remains controversial. Cause-specific survival rates are high for organ-confined disease, but there is a disturbingly high incidence of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. Thus, there has been much interest in neoadjuvant hormonal therapy as a means of shrinking the primary tumor. Both nonrandomized and randomized trials have revealed reductions in tumor size, but the effect on tumor stage and patient survival is less clear. Because the long-term value is not clear, and because neoadjuvant hormonal therapy does have side effects and increases treatment costs, it is at present not advisable outside the clinical research setting.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1997

Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy plus surgery for prostate cancer. The MSKCC experience.

This article reviews the current status of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) in the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. Although significant increases in the organ confined rate and similar marked decreases in the positive margin rate are found in patients receiving NHT, to date no difference in disease free survival rate, as determined by PSA values, can be shown. However, there is a suggestion (P = 10 ng/ ml when treated with NHT compared with controls. Given the prolonged natural history of prostate cancer, longer follow-up will be required before the value of NHT can be established.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗
PubMed2006

Expression of clusterin in prostate cancer correlates with Gleason score but not with prognosis in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy without neoadjuvant hormonal therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the expression level of clusterin in prostate cancer could be used as a prognostic predictor in patients who have undergone radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS: This study included 172 consecutive patients undergoing RP for clinically organ-confined prostate cancer without neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. Immunohistochemical staining was performed in RP specimens obtained from these patients to evaluate the expression level of clusterin protein. The cell proliferative activities and apoptotic features in these specimens were investigated using Ki-67 immunostaining and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling assay, respectively. RESULTS: Varying levels of clusterin expression were noted in 169 of 172 prostate cancer specimens; 32 of the 172 normal prostatic tissue specimens did not exhibit any clusterin staining. Clusterin expression in prostate cancer tissue was significantly related to the Gleason score, but not to the other parameters, including age, serum prostate-specific antigen level, pathologic stage, perineural invasion, tumor volume, and lymph node metastasis. In addition, cell proliferative activity in the prostate cancer specimens was significantly associated with clusterin expression; however, no correlation was found between the apoptotic index and clusterin expression. In this series, 34 (19.8%) of 172 patients developed biochemical recurrence. No significant difference was found in biochemical/recurrence-free survival between patients with strong clusterin expression and those with weak expression. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its detection in most prostate cancer tissue, clusterin expression failed to show a significant association with prognosis in patients undergoing RP without neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. This suggests a limited role for clusterin in the progression of clinically organ-confined prostate cancer in the absence of proapoptotic stimuli.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

The role of docetaxel (Taxotere) as a single agent or in combination before local treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

Neoadjuvant therapy in the treatment of stage IIIa/b non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has the potential to reduce tumor size in patients whose tumors were previously inoperable. This report describes the design and status of an ongoing randomized, phase III study of docetaxel (Taxotere; Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, Antony, France) as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with stage IIIa/b NSCLC, as well as of two phase II studies of combination neoadjuvant therapies. A phase III, multicenter, international, randomized trial is in progress which compares docetaxel with no neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with histologically confirmed, previously untreated NSCLC with stage IIIa N2(T0-3) or T3 (N0-1) disease or stage IIIb disease that can be treated radically. Patients are assigned to receive three cycles of docetaxel or no neoadjuvant therapy. Definitive therapy is administered immediately or within 6 weeks of the third cycle of docetaxel. The primary objective of the study is median survival. Secondary end points include response rate, tumor resectability, survival after surgery and after curative-intent radiation, time to disease progression, and quality of life. To date, 110 of the planned 292 patients have been randomized. It is anticipated that the study will be completed in 1998. A phase I/II dose escalation study of the combination of docetaxel and cisplatin as neoadjuvant treatment of patients with stage IIIa T1-T3 NSCLC with N2 disease on mediastinoscopy is ongoing. The objectives of the study are to determine the clinical response to chemotherapy, the pathologic response after surgery, and survival. A phase II, multicenter, nonrandomized trial of the combination of docetaxel and carboplatin as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with stage IIIa N2 NSCLC is in progress. The primary objective of the study is to determine the response rate after chemotherapy. The results of both studies should be available by late 1997. The ultimate hope is that there is potential for neoadjuvant chemotherapy to provide a significant benefit for patients with advanced NSCLC.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗
PubMed2004

Prospective evaluation of estrogen receptor-beta in predicting response to neoadjuvant antiestrogen therapy in elderly breast cancer patients.

It has been proposed that knowledge of estrogen receptor beta (ER-beta) expression may refine estrogen receptor alpha (ER-alpha) predictivity of response to endocrine therapy. We challenged this hypothesis in ER-alpha-positive breast cancers subjected to preoperative antiestrogen treatment. Forty-seven elderly (> or =65 years old) women with nonmetastatic, ER-alpha-positive (by immunohistochemistry) primary breast cancers (> 2 cm in diameter) entered a neoadjuvant hormone therapy protocol (60 mg/day toremifene for 3 months). ER-alpha and ER-beta (ERs) mRNA was determined by semiquantitative RT-PCR, before (on core needle biopsy) and after (on surgical specimens) neoadjuvant treatment. Study end points included: (1) relation between treatment response and ER mRNA expression; and (2) changes in ER expression after treatment. The response was clinically assessed as tumor size change at the end of the preoperative treatment. ER mRNA expression was assessable before and after treatment in 38 and 20 cases respectively. ER-beta was co-expressed with ER-alpha at variable levels and significantly correlated only with progesterone receptor (P = 0.0285). Objective clinical response, including patients with minor change (> or =25-<50% tumor shrinkage after treatment), was documented in 68.4% of cases and was independent of ER-beta levels or changes. ER-alpha levels were higher in tumors from patients in complete remission than in those from women achieving partial response or minor change compared with non-responsive patients (median expression values: 801 versus 516 versus 320 arbitrary units) and were consistently down-regulated by preoperative treatment. We conclude that in this elderly patient population with ER-alpha-positive tumors, ER-beta mRNA was neither predictive of response to preoperative toremifene nor provided additional information to the knowledge of ER-alpha mRNA levels, which, conversely, were directly correlated with likelihood of response.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

[Application and limitation of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for prostate cancer].

Of 156 patients, 111 (clinical stage T1a-b; 21, T1c; 17, T2a-b; 36, T2c; 27, T3; 10) immediately underwent radical prostatectomy (surgery group), and 45 (clinical stage T1a-b; 8, T1c; 4, T2a-b; 10, T2c; 9, T3; 14) received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT group). NHT offered probability of increasing organ-confined cancer(OCC; pathological stage pT2 or lower N0M0) in the following group, which contains (a) patients who had moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma in the biopsy specimen and T2b or lower diseases, and (b) those who had well differentiated adenocarcinoma, T2c diseases and PSA levels of 10 ng/ml or higher, referred to as "OCC suitable criteria". Of 156 patients, 51 (33%) met OCC suitable criteria. In those cases, the proportion of OCC in NHT group was significantly higher than that in surgery group (11/12 (92%) vs. 16/39 (41%), p = 0.002). NHT is useful for increasing OCC in patients who meet OCC suitable criteria.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2006

[Influence and significance of preoperative intraarterial infusion chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy on survivin, p53 and Bax expression in low rectal carcinoma].

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Recently, neoadjuvant therapy has attracted more attention, but the influence of preoperative intraarterial infusion chemotherapy (PRAC) combined with radiotherapy on Survivin expression in rectal carcinoma is unclear. This study was to investigate the effect of PRAC or radiotherapy on Survivin, P53, and Bax expression in low rectal cancer. METHODS: A total of 60 patients with low rectal carcinoma were randomized into 3 groups: 19 received PRAC combined with preoperative radiotherapy (radiochemotherapy group), 15 received preoperative radiotherapy alone (radiotherapy group), and 26 received operation alone (control group). PRAC was performed using Seldinger technique. Preoperative radiotherapy was performed with a total dose of 20 Gy in 5 days, and superadded 30 Gy after operation. Control group received postoperative radiotherapy with a total dose of 50 Gy. The expression of Survivin, P53, and Bax was examined by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: After neoadjuvant therapy, there was no significant difference in the positive rates of Survivin, P53, and Bax among the 3 groups. In radiochemotherapy group, the positive rate of Survivin was reduced from 63.16% before neoadjuvant therapy to 26.32% after operation (P<0.05), and the overexpression rate of P53 was reduced from 57.89% to 26.32% (P<0.05). In radiotherapy group, the overexpression rate of Survivin was reduced from 53.33% to 13.33% (P<0.05), but there was no significant change in the positive rate of P53. The positive rate of Bax was slightly increased after operation in above 2 groups. In these 2 groups, the median survival time was significantly longer in the patients with reduced Survivin expression than in those with increased Survivin expression (50.05 months vs. 42.61 months, P<0.01). Survivin expression was not obviously related to Bax and P53 expression (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant therapy could decrease the levels of P53 and Survivin expression, might enhance the level of Bax expression, and consequently accelerate cancer cell apoptosis and achieve a better short-term curative effect on low rectal cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2004

Comparison of external radiation therapy vs radical prostatectomy in lymph node positive prostate cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment options for lymph node positive prostate cancer are limited. We retrospectively compared patients who underwent external radiotherapy (ERT) to patients treated by radical prostatectomy (RPX). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 102 lymph node positive patients from the RPX series at Ulm University were evaluated. In all, 76 patients received adjuvant androgen withdrawal as part of their primary treatment. In the ERT group, 44 patients were treated at the University of Michigan using a fractionated regimen. Of these, 21 patients received early adjuvant hormonal therapy. Patients with neoadjuvant therapy before RPX or ERT were excluded. RESULTS: In the RPX group, PSA nadir (nadir < or = 0.2 vs > 0.2 ng/ml) showed a strong association with outcome. In the ERT group, pretreatment PSA was an independent predictor of outcome (P = 0.04) and patients with adjuvant hormonal therapy had a significant longer recurrence-free interval compared to patients without adjuvant therapy (P = 0.004). Comparing only patients with adjuvant hormonal treatment after cancer-specific therapy, the ERT-treated patients had a borderline longer PSA recurrence-free survival time compared to the RPX-treated patients (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In case of positive lymph nodes, RPX and ERT might be considered and need to be explained to the patient. For future treatment decisions, the presented findings and a potential survival benefit need to be evaluated in a larger prospective setting.

Aged↗