SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Nephrectomy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 451 records · Page 25Linked to original sources

PubMed2002

Hand-assisted and conventional laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a comparison of two contemporary techniques.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Laparoscopic nephrectomy may make kidney donation more attractive. Modifications such as hand assistance may improve surgical outcomes. We compared our initial experience with hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy with that of the conventional laparoscopic technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two series of similar patients underwent conventional laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN; N = 15) or hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (HLDN; N = 29). Operative time, warm ischemia time, estimated blood loss, complications, analgesic use, postoperative recovery, and serum creatinine concentration were compared. RESULTS: Open conversion was required in one HLDN patient because of intra-abdominal adhesions, and this patient was excluded from further analysis. The operative time, time to kidney extraction, and warm ischemia time were significantly shorter in the HLDN group, averaging 204.8 v 275.7 minutes, 173.4 v 239.3 minutes, and 2 minutes 21 seconds v 3 minutes 45 seconds, respectively. The intraoperative complication rates were 3.6% and 13.3%, respectively (P = 0.07). The postoperative complication rates were 6.8% and 6.7%. All grafts were functioning at the end of the study period, and there were no differences in rejection episodes, need for dialysis, complications, or nadir creatinine concentration according to the method of harvest. CONCLUSIONS: Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy provides shorter operative and warm ischemia times without a significant increase in donor morbidity.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with a novel electrosurgical snare in a porcine model.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with an arcing-gap electrosurgical snare in a porcine model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A novel electrosurgical snare, optimizing high current density arcing and parenchymal compression, was utilized for laparoscopic renal transection. Five farm pigs underwent unilateral laparoscopic polar partial nephrectomy; 6 weeks later, these same animals underwent contralateral partial nephrectomy just prior to sacrifice. Five additional animals underwent chronic (6-week follow-up) and acute open partial nephrectomies by the conventional surgical technique. RESULTS: The average time for transection with the snare was 5.6 minutes. In 9 of 10 cases, the snare provided satisfactory hemostasis. In the remaining case, additional argon-beam coagulation (ABC) controlled the minimal bleeding present after transection. In all 10 animals, the collecting system was transected. In six cases, application of the snare alone sealed the collecting system. No urinomas developed in the five animals followed for 6 weeks. At 6 weeks, the mean depth of injury at the center of the cut surface was 5.1 mm in the laparoscopic group and 3.9 mm in the open group. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with the arcing-gap electrosurgical snare is feasible in a porcine model. Application of the snare provides excellent hemostasis without the need to control the renal vasculature.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Routine vascular control using the Hem-o-lok clip in laparoscopic nephrectomy: animal study and clinical application.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: During laparoscopic nephrectomy (LPN), a stapling device is often used for vascular control, especially of the renal vein. Herein, we report our experience using a polymer clip (Hem-o-lok) for routine control of the vessels during LPN in the animal and clinical setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty ablative and fifteen live-donor nephrectomies were performed in domestic pigs. Hem-o-lok clips (10 mm; Weck Closure System, Research Triangle Park, NC) were routinely used for vascular control. In addition, from January 2001 to July 2002, 46 patients underwent hand-assisted laparoscopic (HAL) (N=40) or laparoscopic (N=6) nephrectomy for renal disease or donor nephrectomy. Venous control was achieved solely by the Hem-o-lok clips where at least two clips were applied on the patient side. Arterial control was obtained by the Hem-o-lok clips either alone or in combination with the metal clips. The technical difficulty in obtaining vascular control, transfusion requirement, and clinical outcome were evaluated. RESULTS: In the animal study (total 65 nephrectomies), individual vascular control was obtained by the Hem-o-lok clip in all cases except two, where vascular injury during dissection necessitated endoscopic stapling of renal hilum or open conversion. The warm ischemic time for animal donor kidney harvest was uniformly <2 minutes. In the clinical study, arterial control was obtained mostly by a combination of Hem-o-lok and metal clips. Venous control using the Hem-o-lok was successful in all 46 cases without any slipping of clips or uncontrolled bleeding. The mean operating time was 148 minutes. No open conversion was required. The transfusion rate was 6.5% (N=3), with none of the transfusions being related to inadequacy of vascular control using the Hem-o-lok. Major complications included deep vein thrombosis and postoperative retroperitoneal hemorrhage (same patient) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (N = 1). The mean postoperative stay was 5.2 days (range 1-20 days). CONCLUSION: The Hem-o-lok is a reliable and economical device for vascular control in laparoscopic renal surgery.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Laparoscopic v laparoscopy-assisted donor nephrectomy in the porcine model.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is an established procedure in the porcine model. We sought to compare intraoperative variables between live laparoscopic (LAP) and laparoscopy-assisted (LAP-A) donor nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight domestic pigs underwent either traditional laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (N = 4) or laparoscopy-assisted donor nephrectomy (N = 4) using the Pneumosleeve followed by conventional heterotopic autotransplantation. RESULTS: No significant differences were noted between the groups with regard to vessel length, ureteral length, or postoperative urine output. The operating room time was 108+/-12 minutes in the LAP group v 75.8+/-10.3 minutes in the LAP-A group (P = 0.0065). Although the difference was not statistically significant, warm ischemic time, tended to be lower in the LAP-A than the LAP group: 70+/-3.0 seconds v 135+/-57 seconds, respectively (P = 0.059). Graft survival was identical in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy-assisted (via Pneumosleeve) live donor nephrectomy shortens the operative time without affecting graft survival in the domestic swine model.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Laparoscopic nephrectomy for nonfunctioning tuberculous kidney.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign renal disease has been widely accepted, use of the operation for tubercular pyelonephritic kidney is relatively contraindicated because of difficulties in dissecting the dense fibrotic adhesions and the risk of spillage of caseous materials with subsequent dissemination of the disease. However, with the accumulation of experience, laparoscopic surgery is expanding its applications. In this study, we tried to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal tuberculosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: At three centers, 13 laparoscopic nephrectomies were performed between April 1996 and March 1999. The patients consisted of eight men and five women with a mean age of 44.8 years (range 37-51 years). All patients had known renal tuberculosis with a nonfunctioning kidney and underwent nephrectomy after at least 3 months of chemotherapy with four antituberculous drugs. Nine patients underwent the transperitoneal approach and four patients, the retroperitoneal approach. The follow-up was from 2 to 35 months with a mean of 15.8 months. RESULTS: Kidneys were removed laparoscopically in 12 patients (92%). The mean operative time was 268 minutes (range 190-500 minutes), and the mean estimated blood loss was 227 mL. Although there had been some difficulties releasing the adhesions, no significant intraoperative and postoperative complications were observed. Conversion to open surgery was needed in only one patient. The mean hospital stay was 4 days, and the patients returned to normal activity within 10 days. Neither local recurrence nor distant dissemination of the disease was observed during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal tuberculosis was safe and effective with minor complications. Therefore, tuberculosis should not be a contraindication to a laparoscopic approach.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The technique of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy has matured significantly over the past decade and is emerging as an oncologically sound procedure for the management of small renal tumors. Methods of tumor excision as well as parenchymal reconstruction in a hemostatically controlled field have evolved to make this procedure safer. Improved techniques to minimize warm renal ischemia are being developed. Finally, methods to prevent positive surgical margins during laparoscopic surgery are crucial to a satisfactory oncologic outcome. These important technical issues, as well as the current results of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, are discussed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The urologic peer-review literature related to nephron-sparing surgery was reviewed. Controversial issues with respect to the surgical approach, methods of hemostatic control, acceptable time of warm ischemia, and cooling techniques were reviewed and collated. Perioperative results from larger series of laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy were evaluated. RESULTS: Open nephron-sparing surgery for renal tumors < or =4 cm has cancer control equivalent to that of open radical nephrectomy. Evidence is now emerging that laparoscopic partial nephrectomy will provide similar oncologic results, although clinical follow-up is still early. Blood loss, postoperative pain, and convalescence seem to be favor the laparoscopic approach. Complication rates, primarily postoperative bleeding and urine leak, may be higher than for open nephron-sparing surgery. Methods of laparoscopic hemostatic control favor soft vascular clamping for larger tumors that are more endophytic and central. Smaller exophytic lesions may be managed without renal vascular control using a variety of coagulative and hemostatic tools. Data related to warm renal ischemia suggest that the time used for tumor excision and renal reconstruction should be 30 minutes or less. Techniques for laparoscopic renal cooling are being developed. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery is a technique in evolution but with a promising outlook. The urologic peer-review literature reflects an exponential growth in interest, which suggests that this minimally invasive approach is practical and may benefit our patient population so as to allow them to return to normal healthy living more quickly.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with saline-irrigated KTP laser in a porcine model.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of using the potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser to perform laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in a porcine model, with saline irrigation to reduce intraoperative smoke formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A high-power (80 W) KTP laser was used without hilar occlusion in 14 laparoscopic partial nephrectomies in four pigs. During laser discharge, the cutting plane was irrigated continuously with saline. RESULTS: Thirteen partial nephrectomies were completed. Hemostasis was obtained without the need for any non-laser techniques. Only minimal smoke was produced, not affecting visibility or the progress of surgery. Histologic examination of the resection margin showed only minimal tissue destruction. One procedure failed because the laser fiber broke and occluded the suction during the operation. The mean partial nephrectomy time was 13.14 minutes (range 7-19 minutes) with a mean estimated blood lost of 28.57 mL (range 5-80 mL). The mean saline irrigation used for each operation was 2600 mL (range 1500-3400 mL), and the amount of saline drained out was 1700 mL (range 900-3200 mL). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using the 80 W KTP laser is feasible and effective in the porcine model. Saline irrigation dramatically reduces smoke formation. The technique is deserving of clinical studies after the laser-application device and suction irrigation are refined.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Laparoscopic versus open cytoreductive nephrectomy in advanced renal-cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is growing evidence of the benefit of cytoreductive nephrectomy prior to immunotherapy in patients with advanced renal-cell carcinoma (RCC). We compared the outcomes of patients with metastatic RCC undergoing laparoscopic and open cytoreductive nephrectomy prior to systemic therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 27 patients undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic RCC between 2000 and 2004, 16 laparoscopically and 11 by an open approach. Patients with inferior vena-caval tumor thrombus were excluded from analysis. The two groups were comparable with regard to tumor size, clinical stage, and performance status. Surgical, pathologic, and perioperative characteristics and outcomes were compared. RESULTS: The laparoscopic technique was associated with reduced blood loss (149 v 1135 mL; P = 0.03), transfusion rate and quantity (13% v 55%; P = 0.03; 0.13 v 2.0 units of packed red blood cells; P = 0.007), shorter time to oral intake (1.2 v 2.7 days; P < 0.001), and shorter hospitalization (3.6 v 6.8 days; P < 0.001) compared with open nephrectomy. No significant differences were observed with respect to pathologic stage, operative time, complications, fraction receiving subsequent systemic therapy, time to systemic therapy, or survival. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic cytoreductive nephrectomy is associated with reduced morbidity and hospital stay compared with open surgery. There was no increase in complications, and the ability to proceed with subsequent systemic therapy was maintained in the majority of patients. The laparoscopic approach can be considered in patients with metastatic RCC as part of a cytoreductive and systemic-therapy regimen.

Carcinoma, Renal Cell↗

PubMed2006

Retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy in a patient with a double inferior vena cava.

BACKGROUND: Vascular anomalies are considered a contraindication for laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. We report a successful hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy from a donor with a double inferior vena cava. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 37-year-old woman wanted to donate a kidney to her 44-year-old boyfriend who had hypertensive nephropathy. Preoperative donor imaging showed a double inferior vena cava. Each renal vein drains into the ipsilateral inferior vena cava division, making the left renal vein short. A single renal artery, vein, and ureter were noted on both sides. A hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic left nephrectomy was performed. Blood loss was minimal and the warm ischemia time was 2 minutes. Renal transplantation was performed with good initial perfusion and urine output. Cold ischemia and rewarming time was 25 minutes. RESULTS: The donor postoperative period was uneventful with infrequent need for pain relief. The donor was discharged in good condition 3 days postoperatively. The donor's kidney functions were within the normal range at follow-up 4 months postoperatively. The recipient was discharged in good condition 7 days postoperatively. The recipient is alive with good graft function and unremarkable complications at 4 month follow-up. CONCLUSION: Although vascular anomalies present a surgical challenge, we have shown the feasibility of performing hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy in a donor with a double vena cava and short renal vein. With comprehensive preoperative assessment, laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy can be done safely in donors with anatomical anomalies. This may increase the number of living donor kidney transplants as it offers lower postoperative morbidity and economic disincentives for potential donors.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Laparoscopic nephrectomy: comparison of dialysis and non-dialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy is believed to result in possible clinical benefits for the patient. We report our experience with renal laparoscopy in dialysis patients and compare the results with those from non-dialysis patients. METHODS: Between December 1994 and April 1997, 19 dialysis patients underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy or nephroureterectomy at our hospital. The group consisted of 11 female and eight male patients (mean age 45 years). In nine patients the indication for nephrectomy was chronic pyelonephritis. Nephroureterectomy for vesicoureteral reflux with recurrent episodes of pyelonephritis or analgesic nephropathy for exclusion of transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract was considered in nine other patients. Laparoscopic bilateral nephrectomy for drug-resistant hypertension was performed in one patient. In comparison, a consecutive group of non-dialysis patients who had undergone renal laparoscopy was reviewed. RESULTS: In the dialysis group, one patient had to be converted to open nephrectomy due to bleeding. Six dialysis patients required blood transfusions compared with none in the non-dialysis group. There were four complications in the dialysis group and two in the non-dialysis group. Both groups had comparable results for operative times, analgesic consumption, postoperative start of oral intake and mobilization, and duration of hospitalization and convalescence. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic nephrectomy in dialysis patients has acceptable results. The higher transfusion rate is probably due to a lower preoperative haemoglobin and is not aggravated by possible affects of the clotting system in patients with chronic uraemia.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Robot-assisted laparoscopic and open live-donor nephrectomy: a comparison of donor morbidity and early renal allograft outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted laparoscopic donor (RALD) nephrectomy, a new procedure for the removal of a kidney from a living donor, was performed on 13 subjects at our centre. METHODS: The immediate post-operative courses for these donors, and their respective recipients, were compared with those of 13 previous open live-donor nephrectomies (OPEN), performed in our facility. RESULTS: We found no significant differences between these two donor groups with respect to age, gender, body mass index or renal vasculature. The average operative times and the warm ischaemia times were greater in the RALD group, 185.5'' vs 113.4'' (P = 0.0001) and 7'15'' vs 1'41'' (P = 0.0001), respectively. There was no conversion to the open procedure in the RALD group. The estimated blood loss was slight in both groups. Following nephrectomy, deep venous thrombosis occurred in one RALD patient and acute pyelonephritis in one OPEN patient. The average duration of hospitalization was shorter after the RALD procedure (5.84+/-1.8 days vs 9.69+/-2.2 days, P = 0.0001). The estimated creatinine clearance rate (eClcreat) was equivalent for all donors, at 5 days and 1 month after nephrectomy. All kidneys started functioning immediately after the transplantation. The mean recipient eClcreat (ml/min) was 58.16+/-26.7 for OPEN group kidneys and 62.23+/-17.59 for RALD group kidneys (P = 0.65), 5 days after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: RALD nephrectomies were associated with very low morbidity among donors, in which both the operative and warm ischaemia times were of longer duration, but had no observable adverse effects upon short-term graft function.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Open and laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy in Switzerland: a retrospective assessment of clinical outcomes and the motivation to donate.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic living kidney nephrectomy is thought to be associated with reduced morbidity, when compared to open nephrectomy. The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of these techniques on donors' clinical outcomes, satisfaction and motivation to donate. METHODS: Clinical outcomes were retrospectively compared in 152 open (n = 71) or laparoscopic (n = 81) donor procedures. Donor satisfaction and motivation were assessed with a self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: The complication rate was the same with both procedures and the majority of complications were mild. Laparoscopy was significantly less painful and resulted in an insignificantly faster return to active life. More than 80% of the donors volunteered to donate without pressure. Worries about future health status, pain or scars were not important in the decision to donate. Similarly, only 15% considered the surgical procedure as instrumental for their decision. Few donors currently worried about their health with one kidney and more than 95% of the donors in both groups stated that they would give their kidney again. CONCLUSIONS: Living donor nephrectomy is safe, regardless of the procedure used. Although the laparoscopic nephrectomy offers clear short-term benefits over the open nephrectomy, donors' satisfaction was excellent with both surgical approaches. Moreover, the type of procedure did not seem to influence their decision to donate.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Effects of a reversible 'nephrectomy' on renal sympathetic activity and blood pressure in the rat: evidence for an acute angiotensin-mediated hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: To verify whether the normal kidney exerts a supportive, facilitatory action on renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA), the effects of unilateral and bilateral nephrectomy on RSNA have been studied. METHODS: The RSNA, rectal temperature (T), rate of breathing (RB), arterial blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were continuously recorded in three groups of pentobarbital anaesthetized, spontaneously breathing Sprague-Dawley rats: group 1 (n = 5): both kidneys intact; group 2 (n = 5): left surgical nephrectomy; group 3 (n = 5): left surgical nephrectomy and functional exclusion of the right kidney (functional right nephrectomy, FRN), produced by a tight ligature of the renal hilum which was maintained for 3 h. In a fourth group (n = 7), in which nerve activity was not recorded, reopening of the right renal hilum was preceded or followed by intravenous administration of captopril (3 mg/kg). RESULTS: In groups 1 and 2 RSNA increased from 22.3 +/- 2.1 to 122.9 +/- 13.6 and from 26.7 +/- 1.2 to 93.2 +/- 14.0 impulses/s (mean +/- SEM), respectively, without concomitant changes in cardiovascular parameters. In group 3 RSNA decreased from 39.1 +/- 3.1 to 13.7 +/- 2.6 impulses/s during the 3 h of FRN. In group 3 the reopening of the right renal hilum was followed by a marked increase in BP and HR that was prevented or reversed by intravenous captopril in rats of group 4. CONCLUSIONS: The decrease in RSNA observed in rats during bilateral nephrectomy, in contrast to the increase observed in rats with one or both kidneys intact, suggests that the kidney as a whole exerts a supportive role on sympathetic nerve activity. The hypertension and tachycardia that follows the reopening of the right kidney hilum appears to be caused by the generation of endogenous angiotensin II; this is the first evidence of an acute angiotensin-mediated renal hypertension.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1997

Hypercalcemia in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: effect of nephrectomy and metabolic evaluation.

PURPOSE: The role of nephrectomy in the management of hypercalcemia in metastatic renal carcinoma is not known. Hypercalcemia in patients with renal cell carcinoma frequently mimics primary hyperparathyroidism and has been attributed to tumor secretion of parathyroid hormone related protein. We determined the role of cytoreductive surgery in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and hypercalcemia, identified factors that predict patient benefit from surgery, and evaluated the mechanisms of hypercalcemia in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 15 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and hypercalcemia underwent metabolic and laboratory evaluation followed by nephrectomy. Post-operatively they were followed for changes in serum calcium levels. We selected 18 normocalcemic patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and 4 normocalcemic patients without renal cancer to serve as control groups for survival and parathyroid hormone related protein expression. RESULTS: A decrease in serum calcium corrected for albumin occurred in 9 of 11 patients at 1 to 4 weeks after nephrectomy and in 7 of 12 patients at 5 to 16 weeks after nephrectomy. Clinical evaluation supported a parathyroid hormone related protein mechanism of hypercalcemia in 5 of 8 patients. Two patients had evidence of local osteolytic hypercalcemia and 1 had prostaglandin mediated hypercalcemia. CONCLUSIONS: Nephrectomy temporarily ameliorated hypercalcemia in a subgroup of patients with metastatic renal cancer and hypercalcemia. Parathyroid hormone related protein expression was commonly found to be associated with hypercalcemia. Nonparathyroid hormone related protein mechanisms of hypercalcemia in renal carcinoma may be more common than previously thought.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy in children.

PURPOSE: We report our experience with retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy in children, and describe our surgical technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five and 15 children 9 months to 17 years old underwent nephrectomy with cystoscopy plus intravesical ureteral stump fulguration for ureteral ablation and nephrectomy only, respectively. Surgical indications were unilateral multicystic dysplastic kidney in 8 cases (parental preference for surgery), a refluxing, chronic pyelonephritic kidney in 5, renal vascular hypertension in 2, and hydronephrosis and chronic pyelonephritis in 5, including 3 in whom a nephrostomy tube was placed percutaneously before laparoscopic nephrectomy. Access was obtained by a 10 mm. incision made posterior to the anterosuperior iliac spine with dissection into the retroperitoneal space and trochar placement. Two and sometimes 3 additional 5 mm. ports were placed retroperitoneally. RESULTS: Average operative time was 1 hour 42 minutes. The most recent cases were performed in less than 1 hour and in 3 nephrectomy only required 30 minutes. All but 1 procedure were completed laparoscopically. One case was converted to open surgery secondary to obscured visibility due to bleeding. Blood loss in all cases was less than 30 cc (average 5 to 10). A total of 13 children were discharged home immediately postoperatively. Five children underwent concomitant procedures, including contralateral ureteroneocystotomy in 4, circumcision in 1 and cystoscopic fulguration of the ureteral stump in 5. Those who underwent ureteral reimplantation were hospitalized for 48 hours. One patient remained hospitalized for 3 days due to fever of unknown origin and 2 were admitted to the hospital for 23-hour observation. All children returned to full activity within 1 week of surgery. Analgesia consisted of 1 dose of ketorolac, bupivacaine injections at the incisional sites at the completion of the procedure, and acetaminophen postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: As confirmed by parent questionnaire, patient satisfaction was excellent.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy of native kidneys in renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy in transplant recipients and in other patients scheduled for nephrectomy. METHODS: From February 1994 to July 1996, 15 transplant recipients and 17 other patients underwent a total of 36 retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomies for various indications. Operative time, morbidity, and hospital stay were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The average operating time for the 36 procedures was 95+/-38 min (range, 35-180 min). It was shorter in transplant recipients (81+/-32 min) than in other patients (100+/-39 min, P<0.05). There was one postoperative complication in the transplant recipient group. The average length of the postoperative hospitalization was 3.7+/-1.4 days (range, 2-8 days). CONCLUSIONS: The retroperitoneal laparoscopic approach for nephrectomy is as safe and effective in renal transplant recipients as in other patients. Postoperative stay and delay to resumption of oral immunotherapy are short. This approach has become our first-line approach for native nephrectomy in transplant recipients.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

Complications and risks of living donor nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Short- and long-term patient and graft survival rates are better for living donor (vs. cadaver) kidney transplant recipients. However, donor nephrectomy is associated with at least some morbidity and mortality. We have previously estimated the mortality of living donor nephrectomy to be 0.03%. In our present study, to determine associated perioperative morbidity, we reviewed donor nephrectomies performed at our institution from January 1, 1985, to December 31, 1995. METHODS: The records of 871 donors were complete and available for review. Of these donors, 380 (44%) were male and 491 (56%) were female. The mean age at the time of donation was 38 years (range: 17-74 years), and mean postoperative stay was 4.9 days (range: 2-14 days). RESULTS: We noted two (0.2%) major complications: femoral nerve compression with resulting weakness, and a retained sponge that required reexploration. We noted 86 minor complications in 69 (8%) donors: 22 (2.4%) suspected wound infections (only 1 wound was opened), 13 (1.5%) pneumothoraces (6 required intervention, 7 resolved spontaneously), 11 (1.3%) unexplained fevers, 8 (0.9%) instances of operative blood loss > or = 750 ml (not associated with other complications), 8 (0.9%) pneumonias (all of which resolved quickly with antibiotics alone), 5 (0.6%) wound hematomas or seromas (none were opened), 4 (0.5%) phlebitic intravenous sites, 3 (0.3%) urinary tract infections, 3 (0.3%) readmissions (2 for pain control and 1 for mild confusion that resolved with discontinuation of narcotics), 3 (0.3%) cases of atelectasis, 2 (0.2%) corneal abrasions, 1 (0.1%) subacute epididymitis, 1 (0.1%) Clostridium difficile colitis, 1 (0.1%) urethral trauma from catheter placement, and 1 (0.1%) enterotomy. At our institution, no donor died or required ventilation or intensive care. We noted no myocardial infarctions, deep wound infections, or reexplorations for bleeding. Analysis, by logistic regression, identified these significant risk factors for perioperative complications: male gender (vs. female, P<0.001), pleural entry (vs. no pleural entry, P<0.004), and weight > or = 100 kg (vs. < 100 kg, P<0.02). Similar analysis identified these significant risk factors for postoperative stay > 5 days: operative duration > or = 4 hr (vs. < 4 hr, P<0.001) and age > or = 50 years (vs. < 50 years, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Living donor nephrectomy can be done with little major morbidity. The risks of nephrectomy must be balanced against the better outcome for recipients of living donor transplants.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

Complication after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a case report and review.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic procedures are gaining acceptance in the treatment of benign and some malignant urologic disorders. Recently, laparoscopic techniques have been applied to transplant surgery and touted as a safe alternative to traditional open techniques. METHODS: We present a patient who developed a complication from laparoscopic donor nephrectomy that required open corrective surgery. RESULTS: A 25-year-old man underwent laparoscopic donor nephrectomy at a large medical center familiar with the operation. There were no operative or early postoperative complications. Within 6 weeks of the operation, the patient developed signs and symptoms of partial small bowel obstruction. Further evaluation revealed an internal hernia in the retroperitoneum at the site of the nephrectomy. This required a second operation to reduce the hernia and close the defect. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy remains an evolving technique that has not stood the test of time. Larger series will eventually reveal whether this is the procedure of choice as compared to traditional open donor nephrectomy.

Adult↗