PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Syntaxin 1”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 451 records · Page 25Linked to original sources

Identification of the carboxyl-terminal membrane-anchoring region of HPC-1/syntaxin 1A with the substituted-cysteine-accessibility method and monoclonal antibodies.

HPC-1/syntaxin 1A is a member of the syntaxin family, and functions at the plasma membrane during membrane fusion as the target-soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor-attachment protein receptor (t-SNARE). We identified the membrane-anchoring region of HPC-1/syntaxin 1A, and examined its role in anchoring of a protein to the plasma membrane. A series of mutants was created from a cysteine-less mutant of HPC-1/syntaxin 1A by substitution of each residue at the C-terminus with cysteine. The accessibility of the thiol-groups in each mutant was analyzed in vivo. The cysteine (C145) within the N-terminal cytosolic segment was labeled, but not that at C271 or C272, or any of those introduced at the C-terminus. The addition of additional residues to the C-terminal tail of HPC-1/syntaxin 1A allowed labeling by thiol-specific reagents. A monoclonal antibody directed against the C-terminal tail peptide did not react with the protein located at the plasma membrane. In addition, subcellular fractionation and immunocytochemical analyses with various transmembrane mutants showed that the C-terminal tail comprising eight amino acids is essential for anchoring of HPC-1/syntaxin 1A to the plasma membrane. These results indicate that the C-terminal membrane-anchoring region, which comprises 23 amino acids, does not traverse the lipid-bilayer and that the C-terminal tail is essential for anchoring of HPC-1/syntaxin 1A to the plasma membrane.

Amino Acid Substitution↗

Important roles of the C-terminal portion of HPC-1/syntaxin 1A in membrane anchoring and intracellular localization.

HPC-1/syntaxin 1A (HPC-1), which plays an important role in vesicular transport to the plasma membrane, possesses a hydrophobic sequence at its C terminus. When expressed from cDNA in COS cells, wild-type HPC-1 was localized in the Golgi complex and the plasma membrane. Truncation of the hydrophobic domain resulted in the cytoplasmic localization of the mutant, thus indicating that the domain indeed functions as a membrane anchor. A fusion protein with the C-terminal glycosylation sites was glycosylated in transfected cells, providing evidence that HPC-1 has a transmembrane structure, and that the protein is first inserted into the endoplasmic reticulum and then transported to the plasma membrane. A chimeric protein consisting of Escherichia coli maltose-binding protein with the last 24 amino acids of HPC-1 was inserted into the endoplasmic reticulum in a transmembrane topology and localized along the exocytic pathway of transfected cells similar to HPC-1. These results indicate that the portion is important for intracellular localization of HPC-1.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

HPC-1/syntaxin 1A suppresses exocytosis of PC12 cells.

The membrane protein syntaxin (originally named HPC-1) is involved in vesicle trafficking and required for neurotransmitter release at nerve terminals. The presence of syntaxin on target membranes is hypothesized to confer specificity to targeting and fusion via interactions with complementary vesicle-associated proteins. To elucidate the function of syntaxin 1A in exocytosis, HPC-1/syntaxin 1A-reduced PC12h cells (PC12h/Deltasyx) that were stably transfected with a plasmid for antisense syntaxin 1A expression were constructed. Depolarizing stimulation of PC12h/Deltasyx enhanced dopamine release, compared with PC12h. There was a strong inverse correlation between syntaxin 1A protein expression and enhancement of dopamine release. Reduction of syntaxin 1A had no effect on increase of the cytoplasmic free Ca2+ concentration by depolarized stimulation. Moreover, PC12h/Deltasyx clones similarly enhanced of exocytosis by native secretagogues. These results indicate that syntaxin 1A has more than one function in exocytosis.

Animals↗

Volatile anesthetics bind rat synaptic snare proteins.

BACKGROUND: Volatile general anesthetics (VAs) have a number of synaptic actions, one of which is to inhibit excitatory neurotransmitter release; however, no presynaptic VA binding proteins have been identified. Genetic data in Caenorhabditis elegans have led to the hypothesis that a protein that interacts with the presynaptic protein syntaxin 1A is a VA target. Motivated by this hypothesis, the authors measured the ability of syntaxin 1A and proteins that interact with syntaxin to bind to halothane and isoflurane. METHODS: Recombinant rat syntaxin 1A, SNAP-25B, VAMP2, and the ternary SNARE complex that they form were tested. Binding of VAs to these proteins was detected by F-nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation measurements. Structural alterations in the proteins were examined by circular dichroism and ability to form complexes. RESULTS: Volatile anesthetics did not bind to VAMP2. At concentrations in the clinical range, VAs did bind to SNAP-25B; however, binding was detected only in preparations containing SNAP-25B homomultimers. VAs also bound at clinical concentrations to both syntaxin and the SNARE complex. Addition of an N-terminal His6 tag to syntaxin abolished its ability to bind VAs despite normal secondary structure and ability to form SNARE complexes; thrombin cleavage of the tag restored VA binding. Thus, the VA binding site(s) has structural requirements and is not simply any alpha-helical bundle. VAs at supraclinical concentrations produced an increase in helicity of the SNARE complex; otherwise, VA binding produced no gross alteration in the stability or secondary structure of the SNARE complex. CONCLUSION: SNARE proteins are potential synaptic targets of volatile anesthetics.

Anesthetics, Inhalation↗

Enhancement of synaptic transmission by HPC-1 antibody in the cultured hippocampal neuron.

To clarify the function of HPC-1/syntaxin 1A in the mammalian central synapse, the effects of intracellularly applied antibody on the synaptic transmission were examined at the autapse of the cultured rat hippocampal neuron. Intracellularly applied antibody against HPC-1/syntaxin 1A (IgG, 0.3 mg ml(-1)) during whole-cell recording enhanced the autaptic excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC). Pre-immune IgG (0.3 mg ml(-1)) showed no effect. The amplitude-distribution of an asynchronous EPSC was not affected by administration of this antibody, indicating that the increase in the amplitude of the evoked EPSC was attributable to an increase in transmitter release from the presynaptic terminal HPC-1/syntaxin 1A could be involved in suppressing as well as facilitating process of the exocytosis at the mammalian central synapse.

Animals↗

Adrenal gland SNAP-25 expression is altered in thyroid hormone receptor knock-out mice.

SNAP-25 is a protein in neurons and neuroendocrine cells, which is involved, together with syntaxin and VAMP, in neurotransmitter release and neurite outgrowth. Since the thyroid hormone receptors TR alpha and TR beta are essential for nervous system development, their possible role in regulating the expression of these vesicle trafficking proteins was examined by analysing SNAP-25 levels in TR alpha and TR beta knock-out mice. Immunoblotting and RT-PCR showed that SNAP-25 levels are increased in the adrenal gland, but not in cerebellum, in knock-out mice, while syntaxin-1 and VAMP-2 are unaffected in either tissue. Treatment of the pheochromocytoma-derived cell line PC12 with the thyroid hormone L-3,5,3'-triiodothyronine (T3) decreased SNAP-25 expression. Together, these data suggest that thyroid hormones exert a negative regulatory effect on SNAP-25 in adrenal medullary neuroendocrine cells.

Adrenal Medulla↗

Interaction of syntaxins with epithelial ion channels.

Recent evidence suggests that some of the syntaxin isoforms may physically interact with and regulate the transport activity of a defined set of membrane transport proteins. This review examines recent studies of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator and the epithelial sodium channel which define distinct roles of syntaxin 1A and syntaxin 3 in the regulation of surface expression as well as intrinsic properties of these epithelial ion transporters.

Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulato↗

A sec1-related vesicle-transport protein that is expressed predominantly in epithelial cells.

Sec1-related proteins are involved in docking and fusion of transport vesicles in eukaryotic cells. Here we report the cloning and molecular characterization of a Sec1-related protein expressed in the MDCK epithelial cell line. This protein represents a canine counterpart of the murine Munc-18-2/Munc-18b/muSec1 protein, displays 93% amino acid identity with these proteins, has a similar tissue mRNA expression pattern, and associates in vitro with syntaxins 1A, 2, and 3. In situ hybridization analysis of embryonic mouse tissues revealed prominent expression of the munc-18-2 mRNA in the epithelia of several tissues. Cell-fractionation studies demonstrated that the majority of Munc-18-2 is membrane associated. Most of the protein is washed off the membranes by sodium carbonate, pH 11.5. However, the protein is poorly solubilized by detergent treatment. The Munc-18-2 protein was localized, by immunofluorescence microscopy, to the plasma membrane of MDCK cells, and is apically distributed in the epithelial cells of mouse tissues. When overexpressed in COS-1 cells, the protein appeared to be largely cytosolic. However, upon expression with syntaxin 1A, it displayed a shift to the plasma membrane, where the two proteins colocalized. These results identified Munc-18-2 as a predominantly epithelial vesicle-transport protein with a polarized distribution and provided novel in vivo evidence for the association of Sec1-related proteins with members of the syntaxin family.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

A dual function for Munc-18 in exocytosis of PC12 cells.

Munc-18 interacts with the SNARE protein syntaxin and is supposed to influence transmitter release by controlling the formation of exocytosis-relevant SNARE complexes. Here, we used combined biochemical and physiological analyses to study the role of the Munc-18/syntaxin interaction in large dense core vesicle (LDCV) exocytosis of neuroendocrine PC12 cells. We compared two Munc-18 mutants carrying mutations in the syntaxin-binding region and show that Munc-18's membrane association depends on direct binding to syntaxin. The data suggest that perturbation of syntaxin binding inhibits neurotransmitter release upstream of the individual fusion event implying an essential role of the Munc-18/syntaxin complex leading to exocytosis. Furthermore, we show that a Munc-18 mutant lacking any syntaxin binding has a stimulatory effect on secretion, and provide evidence that the Munc-18/Mint1 interaction may constitute a second pathway for Munc-18 to regulate exocytosis. We propose that Munc-18 represents a dynamic link between syntaxin-related and Mint1-related mechanisms, both involved in the control of LDCV exocytosis in neuroendocrine cells.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

Miniature synaptic transmission and BDNF modulate dendritic spine growth and form in rat CA1 neurones.

The refinement and plasticity of neuronal connections require synaptic activity and neurotrophin signalling; their specific contributions and interplay are, however, poorly understood. We show here that brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) increased spine density in apical dendrites of CA1 pyramidal neurones in organotypic slice cultures prepared from postnatal rat hippocampal slices. This effect was observed also in the absence of action potentials, and even when miniature synaptic transmission was inhibited with botulinum neurotoxin C (BoNT/C). There were, however, marked differences in the morphology of individual spines induced by BDNF across these different levels of spontaneous ongoing synaptic activity. During both normal synaptic transmission, and when action potentials were blocked with TTX, BDNF increased the proportion of stubby, type-I spines. However, when SNARE-dependent vesicular release was inhibited with BoNT/C, BDNF increased the proportion of thin, type-III spines. Our results indicate that BDNF increases spine density irrespective of the levels of synaptic transmission. In addition, miniature synaptic transmission provides sufficient activity for the functional translation of BDNF-triggered spinogenesis into clearly defined morphological spine types, favouring those spines potentially responsible for coordinated Ca2+ transients thought to mediate synaptic plasticity. We propose that BDNF/TrkB signalling represents a mechanism of expression of both morphological and physiological homeostatic plasticity in the hippocampus, leading to a more efficient synaptic information transfer across widespread levels of synaptic activity.

Action Potentials↗

Regulation of syntaxin1A-munc18 complex for SNARE pairing in HEK293 cells.

The formation and dissolution of SNARE protein complexes is essential for Ca(2+)-triggered fusion of neurotransmitter-filled vesicles at the presynaptic membrane. Among the pre-synaptic SNARE proteins, the activation of the Q-SNARE syntaxin1A is a critical event for SNARE complex formation. Activation requires syntaxin1A to transit from a munc18-bound non-interacting state to one competent for SNARE binding. The molecular mechanisms that regulate this transition remain unclear. The propensity of syntaxin1A to promote voltage-dependent steady-state inactivation of N-type Ca(2+) channels and accelerate their entry into inactivation was used in a heterologous cell expression system to elucidate regulation of syntaxin1A protein-protein interactions. We report that coexpression of munc18 eliminated the promoting effect of syntaxin1A on inactivation. This effect of munc18 was completely disrupted by coexpression of munc13-1, but not munc13-2 or munc13-3. Also, since expression of munc13-1 with syntaxin1A resulted in an inactivation phenotype identical to that of munc18 with syntaxin1A, the action of munc13-1 on the munc18-syntaxin1A complex was functionally unique and did not result from competitive binding interactions. Furthermore, munc13 expressed with syntaxin1A and munc18 promoted redistribution of a cytosolic SNAP25 mutant to the membrane, a result indicative of syntaxin1A-SNAP25 SNARE pairing. These data demonstrate an important role of munc13 to control the protein-protein interactions of syntaxin1A in vivo, and support munc13 as critical to dissociating syntaxin1A-munc18 complexes and making syntaxin1A available for SNARE interactions.

Animals↗

Syntaxin 1A regulation of weakly inactivating N-type Ca2+ channels.

N- and P/Q-type Ca2+ channels are abundant in nerve terminals where they interact with proteins of the release apparatus, including syntaxin 1A and SNAP-25. In previous studies on N- or P/Q-type Ca2+ channels, syntaxin 1A co-expression reduced current amplitudes, increased voltage-dependent inactivation and/or enhanced G-protein inhibition. However, these studies were conducted in Ca2+ channels that exhibited significant voltage-dependent inactivation. We previously reported that N-type current in bovine chromaffin cells exhibits very little voltage-dependent inactivation and we identified the Ca2+ channel subunits involved. This study was undertaken to determine the effect of syntaxin 1A on this weakly inactivating Ca2+ channel. Co-expression of syntaxin 1A with the weakly inactivating bovine N-type Ca2+ channels in Xenopus oocytes did not appear to alter inactivation but dramatically reduced current amplitudes, without changing cell surface expression. To further understand the mechanisms of syntaxin 1A regulation of this weakly inactivating channel, we examined mutants of the alpha1B subunit, beta2a subunit and syntaxin 1A. We determined that the synprint site of alpha1B and the C-terminal third of syntaxin 1A were necessary for the reduced current amplitude. In addition we show that enhanced G-protein-dependent modulation of the Ca2+ current by syntaxin 1A cannot explain the large suppression of Ca2+ current observed. Of most significance, syntaxin 1A increased voltage-dependent inactivation in channels containing mutant beta2a subunits that cannot be palmitoylated. Our data suggest that changes in inactivation can not explain the reduction in current amplitude produced by co-expressing syntaxin and a weakly inactivating Ca2+ channel.

Animals↗

Kv2.1 channel activation and inactivation is influenced by physical interactions of both syntaxin 1A and the syntaxin 1A/soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor-25 (t-SNARE) complex with the C terminus of the channel.

Kv2.1, the prevalent delayed-rectifier K(+) channel in neuroendocrine and endocrine cells, was suggested previously by our group to be modulated in islet beta-cells by syntaxin 1A (Syx) and soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein-25 (SNAP-25). We also demonstrated physical interactions in neuroendocrine cells between Kv2.1, Syx, and SNAP-25, characterized their effects on Kv2.1 activation and inactivation in Xenopus laevis oocytes, and suggested that they pertain to the assembly/disassembly of the Syx/SNAP-25 (t-SNARE) complex. In the present work, we established the existence of a causal relationship between the physical and the functional interactions of Syx with the Kv2.1 channel using three different peptides that compete with the channel for binding of Syx when injected into oocytes already coexpressing Syx with Kv2.1 in the plasma membrane: one peptide corresponding to the Syx-binding region on the N-type Ca(2+) channel, and two peptides corresponding to Syx-binding regions on the Kv2.1 C terminus. All peptides reversed the effects of Syx on Kv2.1, suggesting that the hyperpolarizing shifts of the steady-state inactivation and activation of Kv2.1 caused by Syx result from cell-surface protein-protein interactions and point to participation of the C terminus in such an interaction. In line with these findings, the effects of Syx were dissipated by partial deletions of the C terminus. Furthermore, the t-SNARE complex was shown to bind to the Kv2.1 C terminus, and its effects on the inactivation of Kv2.1 were dissipated by partial deletions of the C terminus. Taken together, these findings suggest that physical interactions of both Syx and the t-SNARE complex with the C terminus of Kv2.1 are involved in channel regulation.

Animals↗

Target soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors (t-SNAREs) differently regulate activation and inactivation gating of Kv2.2 and Kv2.1: Implications on pancreatic islet cell Kv channels.

We have hypothesized that the plasma membrane protein components of the exocytotic soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein (SNAP) receptor (SNARE) complex, syntaxin 1A and SNAP-25, distinctly regulate different voltage-gated K+ (Kv) channels that are differentially distributed. Neuroendocrine islet cells (alpha, beta, delta) uniformly contain both syntaxin 1A and SNAP-25. However, using immunohistochemistry, we show that the different pancreatic islet cells contain distinct dominant Kv channels, including Kv2.1 in beta cells and Kv2.2 in alpha and delta cells, whose interactions with the SNARE proteins would, respectively regulate insulin, glucagon and somatostatin secretion. We therefore examined the regulation by syntaxin 1A and SNAP-25 of these two channels. We have shown that Kv2.1 interacts with syntaxin 1A and SNAP-25 and, based on studies in oocytes, suggested a model of two distinct modes of interaction of syntaxin 1A and the complex syntaxin 1A/SNAP-25 with the C terminus of the channel. Here, we characterized the interactions of syntaxin 1A and SNAP-25 with Kv2.2 which is highly homologous to Kv2.1, except for the C-terminus. Comparative two-electrode voltage clamp analysis in oocytes between Kv2.2 and Kv2.1 shows that Kv2.2 interacts only with syntaxin 1A and, in contrast to Kv2.1, it does not interact with the syntaxin 1A/SNAP-25 complex and hence is not sensitive to the assembly/disassembly state of the complex. The distinct regulation of these closely related channels by SNAREs may be attributed to differences in their C termini. Together with the differential distribution of these channels among islet cells, their distinct regulation suggests that the documented profound down-regulation of islet SNARE levels in diabetes could distort islet cell ion channels and secretory responses in different ways, ultimately contributing to the abnormal glucose homeostasis.

Animals↗

Amphetamine induces a calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II-dependent reduction in norepinephrine transporter surface expression linked to changes in syntaxin 1A/transporter complexes.

Norepinephrine (NE) transporters (NETs) are high-affinity transport proteins that mediate the synaptic clearance of NE after vesicular release. NETs represent a major therapeutic target for antidepressants and are targets of multiple psychostimulants including amphetamine (AMPH) and cocaine. Recently, we demonstrated that syntaxin 1A (SYN1A) regulates NET surface expression and, through binding to the transporter's NH(2) terminus, regulates transporter catalytic function. AMPH induces NE efflux and may also regulate transporter trafficking. We monitored NET distribution and function in catecholaminergic cell lines (CAD) stably transfected with either full-length human NET (CAD-hNET) or with an hNET N-terminal deletion (CAD-hNETDelta(28-47) cells). In hNET-CAD cells, AMPH causes a slow and small reduction of surface hNET with a modest increase in hNET/SYN1A associations at the plasma membrane. In contrast, in CAD-hNETDelta(28-47) cells, AMPH induces a rapid and substantial reduction in surface hNETDelta(28-47) accompanied by a large increase in plasma membrane hNETDelta(28-47)/SYN1A complexes. We also found that AMPH in CAD-hNETDelta(28-47) cells induces a robust increase in cytosolic Ca2+ and concomitant activation of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII). Inhibition of either the increase in intracellular Ca2+ or CaMKII activity blocks AMPH-stimulated hNETDelta(28-47) trafficking and the formation of hNETDelta(28-47)/SYN1A complexes. Here, we demonstrate that AMPH stimulation of CAMKII stabilizes an hNET/SYN1A complex. This hNET/SYN1A complex rapidly redistributes, upon AMPH treatment, when mechanisms supported by the transporter's NH2 terminus are eliminated.

Amphetamine↗

Syntaxin 1A inhibits GABA flux, efflux, and exchange mediated by the rat brain GABA transporter GAT1.

GABA transporters control extracellular GABA levels by coupling transmitter uptake to the sodium and chloride cotransport. The rat brain GABA transporter GAT1 and other members of this family are regulated by direct interactions with syntaxin 1A, a protein involved in vesicle docking and in the regulation of several ion channels and transporters. We have shown previously that syntaxin 1A exerts its effects on GAT1 by decreasing the net uptake of GABA and its associated ions through interactions with aspartic acid residues in the N-terminal tail of GAT1. This reduction in net uptake could be caused by many steps in the transport cycle, including substrate binding, substrate flux, substrate efflux, or reorientation of the unliganded transporter. To address this question, we performed GABA flux assays, measured flux- and efflux-associated ion currents, and assessed GABA exchange in multiple experimental systems expressing syntaxin 1A and wild-type GAT1 or GAT1 mutants. Syntaxin 1A caused similar reductions in forward and reverse transport that did not involve changes in apparent transport affinities for sodium, chloride, or GABA. The syntaxin 1A-mediated reduction in GABA flux and efflux was mimicked by mutations in GAT1 at the syntaxin 1A binding site. The binding site GAT1 mutant also caused a reduction in exchange. These data suggest that syntaxin 1A exerts its effects, directly or indirectly, on GAT1 function through interactions with GAT1's N-terminal tail and that the inhibition occurs at a step in the translocation process after substrate binding but which involves both unidirectional transport and transmitter exchange.

Animals↗