[Measles vaccination with attenuated and live vaccine simultaneously with use of the ADTP vaccine containing parapertussis component].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A placebo-controlled study of varicella vaccine given either with or 6 weeks after measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine was undertaken in healthy children (mean age 16 months). A total of 101 varicella-zoster virus antibody-negative children completed the study. Serologic response to MMR vaccine was excellent (nearly 100%) and not significantly affected by the administration of varicella vaccine. Seroconversion in response to varicella vaccine was excellent and was not affected by MMR vaccine. No significant differences in fever or skin rashes between those receiving MMR vaccine with varicella vaccine or MMR vaccine with placebo were noted, but fever and skin rashes were more frequent after the first immunization (MMR with varicella vaccine or MMR vaccine with placebo) compared with the second (varicella vaccine or placebo injection). Symptoms of fatigue, irritability, and upper respiratory tract infections were more common after MMR vaccine was given regardless of whether it was given simultaneously with varicella vaccine or placebo injection.
OBJECTIVE: The safety and immunogenicity of a diphtheria-tetanus toxoid-acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP; Trepedia)/Haemophilus influenzae b polysaccharide (PRP-T; ActHib) combined vaccine (TriHibir; Pasteur Mérieux Connaught) was compared with DTaP and PRP-T given at the same visit but at separate sites in a prospective multicenter, open label trial. METHODS: Infants were randomized to four groups (three consistency lots of DTaP/PRP-T vs. one of the consistency lots given as separate vaccines); injections were administered at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. Pre-Dose 1 and post-Dose 3 sera were assayed for antibody titers against all antigens. Reactions to the vaccinations were assessed by parent questionnaire for 30 days after each injection visit. RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-five infants were enrolled; 296 evaluable infants were included in the DTaP/PRP-T group compared with 70 infants in the DTaP and PRP-T vaccine group. Infants who received the combined vaccine had higher post-Dose 3 geometric mean antibody titers to diphtheria antitoxin (P < 0.01) and pertussis filamentous hemagglutinin (P < 0.05) and lower geometric mean antibody titers to tetanus antitoxin (P < 0.05) and Haemophilus influenzae b (Hib) polysaccharide (PRP) (P < 0.05). The geometric mean anti-PRP antibody titer in the DTaP/PRP-T group was 4.3 micrograms/ml compared with 7.0 micrograms/ml in the separate vaccine group (P < 0.05), and the percentage of infants with antibody titers > or = 0.15 and 1 microgram/ml were, respectively, 95 and 86%, whereas they were 100% for both titers in the separate vaccines group. DTaP/ PRP-T vaccine given concomitantly or 1 month apart from hepatitis B vaccine and oral poliomyelitis vaccine caused no significant differences in immunogenicity or safety. The safety assessments for the DTaP/PRP-T vaccine showed no consistent differences in systemic or local injection site reactions compared with DTaP and PRP-T administered separately. CONCLUSION: Although the antibody responses to tetanus and Hib polysaccharide in the evaluated DTaP/PRP-T combined vaccine were significantly lower than those seen after separate DTaP and PRP-T administration, the combined vaccine elicited an immune response against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and Haemophilus influenzae b likely to confer protection.
BACKGROUND: Combination vaccines are urgently needed to reduce the number of injections given to young children. The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a combination vaccine that contains diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis antigens (DTaP), recombinant hepatitis B surface antigen (HepB) and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) polysaccharide conjugated to tetanus toxoid (PRP-T). METHODS: Four hundred five infants were randomized equally to three groups and immunized at 2, 4 and 6 months of age with: (1) DTaP/HepB vaccine used to reconstitute lyophilized PRP-T vaccine and administered as a single injection; (2) DTaP/HepB vaccine and PRP-T vaccine administered as two separate injections; or (3) DTaP, HepB and PRP-T vaccines administered as three separate injections. Safety was closely monitored, and blood specimens were obtained to assess antibody responses to each vaccine antigen. RESULTS: All study vaccines were well-tolerated, and the rates of systemic and injection site reactions were similar between groups. After the third dose the geometric mean antibody concentrations to Hib were significantly lower in subjects in Group 1 (1.63 microg/ml) compared with subjects in Groups 2 and 3 (6.26 and 6.15 microg/ml, respectively; P < 0.0001). Subjects with antibody concentrations <1.0 microg/ml after the third dose responded well to a booster dose of Hib conjugate vaccine given at 11 to 15 months of age (41 of 44 with anti-PRP > or = 1.0 microg/ml). Differences between groups for antibody responses to the other vaccine components were not clinically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Infants given a combined DTaP/ HepB/PRP-T vaccine experienced a significantly lower antibody response to the PRP-T component than infants given PRP-T vaccine as a separate injection. However, the immune response to a booster dose of Hib conjugate vaccine indicated the presence of immunologic memory.
Concerns about the safety of whole-cell pertussis vaccines prompted development of acellular vaccines that are less likely to provoke adverse events because they contain purified antigenic components of Bordetella pertussis. Two diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccines--ACEL-IMUNE and Tripedia--have been licensed for several years, but (until recently) only for administration of the fourth and fifth doses in the series to children aged 15 months-6 years who previously had received three or more doses of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and whole-cell pertussis (DTP) vaccine. Published reports indicate that, when administered to infants aged 2, 4, and 6 months, acellular pertussis vaccines are effective in preventing pertussis disease and associated with fewer local, systemic, and certain more serious adverse events than whole-cell pertussis vaccines. On the basis of these data, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has licensed three DTaP vaccines for use among children aged 6 weeks-6 years. Tripedia is now licensed for the initial four doses, and ACEL-IMUNE for all five doses of the diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccination series. A third DtaP vaccine (Infanix) was licensed in January 1997 for the initial four doses of the series. Tripedia, ACEL-IMUNE, and Infanix are now recommended for routine vaccination of infants and young children, although whole-cell pertussis vaccines remain acceptable alternatives. Tripedia, ACEL-IMUNE, and Infanix are recommended for all remaining doses in the schedule for children who have started the vaccination series with one, two, three, or four doses of whole-cell pertussis vaccines. In September 1996, FDA licensed the use of TriHIBit (ActHIB reconstituted with Tripedia) for the fourth dose in the series of vaccinations against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, and Haemophilus influenzae type b disease.
To investigate the incorporation of oral rhesus-human reassortant rotavirus tetravalent (RRV-TV) vaccine into a routine immunization programme, RRV-TV or oral placebo was coadministered with a pentavalent diphtheria-tetanus-whole-cell pertussis-Haemophilus influenzae b (Hib)-inactivated polio vaccine and hepatitis B vaccine following a 3-4-5-mo schedule in a double-blind trial involving 249 infants. Seroconversion rates after 3 doses of rotavirus vaccine were 80% for rotavirus immunoglobulin A (IgA) and 93% for RRV neutralizing antibodies. Rotavirus vaccine did not interfere with the immune responses to diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, Hib, poliovirus 1, 2 and 3, or hepatitis B. Following the first, second and third doses of vaccine, fever >38 degrees C on the day of vaccination was seen in 31%, 24% and 24%, respectively, with no difference between RRV-TV- and placebo-vaccinated children. This fever was presumably due to the whole-cell pertussis vaccine. Those vaccinees who received concomitant RRV-TV vaccine had another peak of fever around d 4 after the first dose, when 25% of them had fever >38 degrees C and 3% >39 degrees C. It is concluded that RRV-TV rotavirus vaccine can be given concurrently with other childhood immunizations following a 3-4-5-mo vaccination schedule. However, febrile reactions to RRV-TV rotavirus vaccine are common when the first dose is given at the age of 3 mo.
The reactogenicity and immunogenicity of a new influenza subunit vaccine essentially containing only haemagglutinin and neuraminidase was studied in man. The vaccine was compared to commercially available vaccines, an adjuvant containing tween-ether split vaccine (800 IU per dose), and a fluid whole-virus vaccine (2100 IU per dose). Two dosages (700 and 2100 IU) of the fluid subunit vaccine were compared. All vaccines contained the virus strains recommended by the WHO for the 1975/76 season. In a double-blind study 399 volunteers were randomly selected to receive one of the four vaccines. The volunteers were examined for side-effects 24 and 48 hr after vaccination. Antibodies inhibiting haemagglutination were determined prior to and four weeks after vaccination. The sudunit vaccine at 700 IU per dose caused significantly fewer local side effects than the comparable split vaccine, and resulted in significantly higher antibody titers against both influenza A strains. A comparison of the subunit and whole virus vaccines containing high dosages (2100 IU) showed striking differences in reactogenicity. Subunit vaccine was very well tolerated. whereas whole virus vaccine caused systemic reactions, including fever and headache, in 15% of the volunteers. No significant reactogenicity was seen with a high dosage of subunit vaccine (2100 IU) although this is a three-fold increase on the currently used European dosage. Antibody titers were significantly enhanced however.
PFP-1 vaccine was evaluated in a randomized, controlled study in 47 RSV seropositive children. Trivalent inactivated influenza virus (TIV) vaccine was the control. Vaccine reactions were monitored, and bloods were obtained before vaccination, 4 weeks after vaccination, and at the end of the RSV season. Respiratory illnesses were evaluated during the outbreak. Neutralizing antibody (Nt Ab) assay to RSV, IgG ELISA to RSV proteins and a Western blot assay were performed. Acute reactions with the PFP vaccine were mild. An early RSV outbreak resulted in infection of 44.4% of the TIV recipients shortly after vaccination. In the PFP vaccine groups, the Nt Ab and ELISA assays did not distinguish between Ab rises due to natural infection versus vaccine; however, the Western blot assay characterized the post-vaccine rises. Two major Western blot profiles were produced: an infection profile (antibodies that recognized the F and G surface glycoproteins and internal proteins) and a vaccine profile (antibodies that recognized only the surface glycoproteins). The PFP vaccinees who were not infected with RSV developed ELISA and Nt Ab responses to the surface glycoproteins that were similar to the TIV vaccines with natural RSV infection. None of the children developed vaccine-enhanced disease. Thus, the PFP-1 vaccine was safe and immunogenic in RSV seropositive children even when vaccine was administered during a RSV outbreak, and the Western blot assay was useful in distinguishing Ab rises caused by RSV infection versus PFP vaccine.
In the present study, cross-protection to bovine herpesvirus type 5 (BHV-5) induced by bovine herpesvirus type 1 (BHV-1) vaccination was examined following inoculation of rabbits and calves with a glycoprotein E (gE)-negative BHV-1 vaccine and subsequent challenge with BHV-5. Rabbits (n=5) and calves (n=8) were vaccinated [five rabbits intranasally (IN), four calves IN and four intramuscularly (IM)] with 7.1 log(10)median tissue culture infective dose (TCID(50)) of the BHV-1 vaccine. Rabbits and calves were challenged IN [rabbits 2 weeks post-vaccination (pv); calves 5 weeks pv] with 9.1log(10)TCID(50) of BHV-5. Two out of five vaccinated rabbits died after challenge with typical BHV-5 disease, as did 3/5 non-vaccinated controls. In calves, 4/8 vaccinated animals displayed mild signs of disease, whereas 6/6 non-vaccinated controls developed signs of disease, so severe that 2/6 had to be killed. Besides, nasal virus shedding post-challenge was not reduced by vaccination. At necropsy, on day 21 post-challenge, typical BHV-5 lesions were evident in brain tissues of both vaccinated and non-vaccinated calves. Dexametasone administration at 180 days post-infection did not reactivate clinical signs despite BHV-5 shedding in nasal secretions of both vaccinated and non-vaccinated calves. These results show that the BHV-1 vaccine evaluated here did not confer protection to BHV-5 in rabbits. In calves, BHV-1 vaccination did confer some protection to BHV-5 induced clinical disease, but it did not prevent infection and had no effect on nasal virus shedding or on the development of encephalitic lesions.
Data from two Swedish pertussis vaccine trials with various combination vaccines were used to compare anti-diphtheria antitoxin concentrations over time between different vaccines, vaccine lots and vaccine schedules. The immune responses were measured with a validated ELISA method.Results are given for 1326 children, born 1992, that were recruited to the placebo (DT)-controlled Trial I which used a 2, 4, 6 month schedule. Two DTP acellular and one DTP whole cell vaccine were used. No DT boosters were given until 5 years of age. Trial II recruited children born 1993-94 and compared three DTP acellular vaccines with one DTP whole cell vaccine. Results are given for 306 children in a 2, 4, 6 month schedule and for 531 children in a 3, 5, 12 month schedule. The latter schedule gave significantly higher diphtheria antitoxin concentrations post third dose. The various DTP acellular vaccines and an inefficacious DTP whole cell vaccine gave lower antitoxin concentrations than both an efficacious DTP whole cell vaccine and the DT vaccine. The larger differences in antigen response between vaccines was reduced in the course of time. Generally, an initial rapid decline of antitoxin concentration was followed by a slower decline; the change typically occurring when the antitoxin concentration reached 0.13-0.16 EU/ml. The time needed to reach this level was between 6 and 10 months based on the initial vaccine response.A "best-fit" combined exponential regression model was used to predict the optimal timing for booster vaccinations against diphtheria.Our data support a 3, 5, 12 month schedule followed by a fourth dose 4-5 years after the third dose, depending upon the vaccine used.
Highly effective recombinant vaccines have been developed against the helminth parasites Taenia ovis, Taenia saginata and Echinococcus granulosus. These vaccines indicate that it is possible to achieve a reliable, high level of protection against a complex metazoan parasite using defined recombinant antigens. However, the effectiveness of the vaccines against the taeniid cestodes stands in contrast to the more limited successes which characterise attempts to develop vaccines against other platyhelminth or nematode parasites. This review examines the features of the host-parasite relationships among the taeniid cestodes which have formed the basis for vaccine development. Particular consideration is given to the methodologies that have been used in making the cestode vaccines that might be of interest to researchers working on vaccination against other helminths. In developing the cestode vaccines, antigens from the parasites' infective larval stage contained within the egg (oncosphere) were identified as having the potential to induce high levels of protection in vaccinated hosts. A series of vaccination trials with antigen fractions, and associated immunological analyses, identified individual protective antigens or fractions. These were cloned from cDNA and the recombinant proteins expressed in Escherichia coli. This strategy was independently successful in developing vaccines against T. ovis and E. granulosus. Identification of protective antigens for these species enabled rapid identification, cloning and expression of their homologues in related species and thereby the development of effective vaccines against T. saginata, E. multilocularis and, more recently, T. solium. The T. saginata vaccine provides an excellent example of the use of two antigen components, each of which were not protective when used individually, but when combined they induce a reliable, high level of protection. One important contributing factor to the success of vaccine development for the taeniid cestodes was the concentration on studies seeking to identify native host-protective antigens, before the adoption of recombinant methodologies. The cestode vaccines are being developed towards practical (commercial) application. The high level of efficacy of the vaccines against T. solium cysticercosis and hydatid disease suggests that they would be effective also if used directly in humans.
The period during which pigs are protected after vaccination is important for the successful usage of a marker vaccine against classical swine fever virus (CSFV) in an eradication programme. In four animal experiments with different vaccination-challenge intervals we determined the duration of protection of an E2 subunit marker vaccine in pigs after a single vaccination. Unvaccinated pigs were included in each group to detect transmission of the challenge virus. Three groups of six pigs were vaccinated once and subsequently inoculated with the virulent CSFV strain Brescia after a vaccination-challenge interval of 3, 51/2, 6 or 13 months. All vaccinated pigs, 16 out of 18, with neutralising antibodies against CSFV at the moment of challenge, 3, 51/2, 6 or 13 months later, survived, whereas unvaccinated control pigs died from acute CSF or were killed being moribund. A proportion of the vaccinated pigs did however develop fever or cytopenia after challenge and two vaccinated pigs were viremic after challenge. Virus transmission of vaccinated and challenged pigs to unvaccinated sentinel pigs did not occur in groups of pigs which were challenged 3 or 6 months after a single vaccination. Two out of eight vaccinated pigs that were found negative for CSFV neutralising antibody at 13 months after vaccination died after subsequent challenge. The findings in this study demonstrate that pigs can be protected against a lethal challenge of CSFV for up to 13 months after a single vaccination with an E2 subunit marker vaccine.
BACKGROUND: This study characterizes the healthcare visits at which children receive vaccinations, including the number of these visits and the number of vaccinations that are administered. METHODS: The 1999 National Immunization Survey (NIS) is a nationally representative sample of children aged 19 to 35 months, verified by provider records, that is conducted to obtain estimates of vaccination coverage rates. We describe the number of healthcare visits in which one or more vaccinations were given, the number of vaccinations given at these visits, and the number of visits and vaccinations needed for an underimmunized child to complete the recommended vaccination series. RESULTS: Of the children who did not receive all doses of the recommended vaccinations (4:3:1:3:3 vaccination series), three fourths had four or more immunization visits. Vaccination coverage increased as the number of visits increased, and children who had completed the series were more likely to receive multiple vaccinations than those who had not. Most children (70.7%) received a maximum of four vaccinations in any immunization visit. The majority of children (73.5%) who had not completed the 4:3:1:3:3 vaccination series needed only a single visit to complete the series. The majority (61.7%) of children who needed only one visit also needed only one additional vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: While estimated national coverage for all recommended vaccinations is considerably below the Healthy People 2000 and Healthy People 2010 goal of 90%, achieving this goal is in essence just one visit away. If all children who needed one more visit were to receive that final visit, the national coverage among children 19 to 35 months for all recommended vaccinations would be 93%.
OBJECTIVE: Concerns about financial barriers to vaccination led to the creation of the Vaccines for Children (VFC) program, which provides free vaccines to states for disadvantaged children. Our objective was to understand the effect of free vaccine and insurance on pediatric nurse practitioners' (PNPs) likelihood of referring children to public vaccine clinics. Although referral from the medical home to public vaccine clinics is preferable to not vaccinating, there are disadvantages, including the potential for windows of inadequate protection and fragmentation of care. METHODS: A standardized survey was conducted by trained personnel using computer-assisted telephone interviewing. We interviewed a national random sample of primary care PNPs in 1997. RESULTS: In 1997, 252 of 271 (93%) directly contacted PNPs were interviewed. The percentage of respondents receiving free vaccines was 82%. Among PNPs not receiving free vaccines, the percentages stating that they were likely to refer insured, Medicaid insured, and uninsured children to public vaccine clinics were 7%, 27%, and 67%, respectively. In contrast, among PNPs receiving free vaccines, only 46% would refer an uninsured child and 10% a Medicaid child. CONCLUSIONS: Most respondents received free vaccine supplies in 1997. Based on current PNP data and previous physician data, most clinicians who do not receive free vaccine supplies are likely to refer uninsured children to public vaccine clinics. In contrast, clinicians who receive free vaccine supplies are much more likely to vaccinate uninsured and Medicaid-insured children.
Intradermal (ID) vaccination has been proposed as a cost-saving alternative for administration of Hepatitis B (HB) vaccine to implement of mass vaccination of high-risk groups, particularly in developing countries. Therefore, the effectiveness of ID vaccination needs to be evaluated and verified in different ethnic backgrounds. The present study is a randomized trail using a recombinant vaccine (Heberbiovac) to compare immunogenecity and safety of an intradermal low-dose (4 microg) with standard dose (20 microg) of intramuscular (IM) vaccination in healthy Iranian population. Participants were 143 healthy Iranian medical and nursing students randomly allocated to ID or IM vaccination group. The vaccine was inoculated at 0, 1 and 6 months intervals. Serum samples were collected 1 month after the last vaccination and the anti-HBs response was determined using ELISA. The overall seroprotection rate (anti-HBs level > or = 10 IU/L) was 97.3% for ID vaccination group, which was not different from that of IM vaccination group (98.55%) (p = 0.99). Similarly, geometric mean titers (GMT) of anti-HBs were not significantly different between ID (1164.1 IU/L) and IM (1071.8 IU/L) vaccination groups (p = 0.4). There was no significant difference in seroprotection rate and GMT of anti-HBs between sexes. Although induration and hyperpigmentation at the site of injection were more frequently observed in ID vaccination group, no other clinically adverse effects were observed in both vaccination groups. We conclude that the ID route, which would require one-fifth of the standard dose, would be suitable for use in certain groups such as high-risk adults when the cost of vaccine is the inhibiting factor for mass vaccination.
Broiler chicks with maternal antibodies to Newcastle disease virus (NDV) but none to avian metapneumovirus (APV) were divided into six groups. One group was kept as an unvaccinated control group. Three of the other groups were vaccinated at 1 day old with live APV vaccine or one of two live NDV vaccines (VG/GA or HB1). The remaining two groups received the APV vaccine in combination with either of the two NDV vaccines at 1 day old. At intervals after vaccination for up to 42 days, distribution of the viruses in the tissues was monitored, together with humoral antibody responses. Few NDV isolations were made from any NDV-vaccinated chicks, probably due to the presence of NDV maternal antibodies. In both dual-vaccinated groups, APV persisted longer (up to 21 days post vaccination (d.p.v.)) than in the single vaccinates (up to 14 d.p.v.). After 14 d.p.v., antibody titres against APV in both dual-vaccinated groups remained higher than the single APV vaccinates. For NDV haemagglutination inhibition antibodies, similar titres were found in the single and dual NDV VG/GA vaccinates. However, for chickens dually vaccinated with NDV HB1 and APV, the haemagglutination inhibition titres were significantly higher at 21 and 28 d.p.v. than the single HB1 vaccinates. These differences reflect the fact that NDV haemagglutination inhibition titres may depend on the NDV vaccine used.