[After-effects of high spinal anesthesia].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Anesthesia↗
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Results for “ANESTHESIA, SPINAL”
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
[Complications of spinal anesthesia].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Anesthesia↗
The grave spinal cord paralyses caused by spinal anesthesia.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Anesthesia↗
The grave spinal cord paralyses caused by spinal anesthesia.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Anesthesia↗
[A case of apnea during spinal anesthesia after intravenous injection of sedatives].
During spinal anesthesia for appendectomy (sensory level: -Th7), apnea occurred for about 20 minutes by intravenous administration of diazepam. Since the patient showed hyperventilation sign before the incident, this apnea might be caused by low PaCO2 and stopping respiratory stimulation from psychological unrest when diazepam, pentazocine and droperidol were administered. In the postoperative period, this patient showed normal neurologic and psychosomatic functions. In such a case as this, long duration of apnea might damage brain by severe hypoxia. Apnea after hyperventilation during spinal anesthesia as observed in this case could lead to a serious accident.
Adult↗
A comparison of minidose lidocaine-fentanyl and conventional-dose lidocaine spinal anesthesia.
The syndrome of transient neurologic symptoms (TNS) after spinal lidocaine has been presumed to be a manifestation of local anesthetic neurotoxicity. Although TNS is not associated with either lidocaine concentration or dose, its incidence has never been examined with very small doses of spinal lidocaine. One hundred ten adult ASA physical status I and II patients presenting for arthroscopic surgery of the knee were randomly assigned to receive spinal anesthesia with either 1% hypobaric lidocaine 50 mg (Group L50) or 1% hypobaric lidocaine 20 mg + 25 microg fentanyl (Group L20/F25). Hemodynamic data, block height and regression, and time to first micturition and discharge were recorded. Follow-up phone calls were made by a blinded researcher at 48-72 h using a standardized questionnaire. Both groups had a median peak cephalad block level of T10. Lidocaine 50 mg was associated with a greater decrease in systolic blood pressure and a greater need for ephedrine. Time until block regression to the S2 dermatome (80 vs. 110 min) and outpatient time to void (130 vs 162 min) and discharge (145 vs. 180 min) were faster in the L20/F25 group. Complaints of TNS were found in 32.7% of the patients in the L50 group and in 3.6% of the patients in the L20/F25 group. We conclude that spinal anesthesia with lidocaine 20 mg + fentanyl 25 microg provided adequate anesthesia with greater hemodynamic stability and faster recovery than spinal anesthesia with lidocaine 50 mg. The incidence of TNS after spinal lidocaine 20 mg + fentanyl 25 microg was significantly less than that after spinal lidocaine 50 mg.
Adjuvants, Anesthesia↗
Spinal cord transmission of impulses during high spinal anesthesia as measured by cortical evoked potentials.
Cortical evoked potentials (CEPs) resulting from posterior tibial nerve stimulation could be recorded before, but not during, diagnostic high spinal anesthesia to T2-3 in six patients with chronic pain. In contrast, spinal cord stimulation at T8-9 during high spinal anesthesia resulted in CEPs with reduced peak amplitudes and increased P1 and N2 latencies. Amplitudes of the CEPs evoked by spinal cord stimulation increased with increases in stimulus intensity before and during high spinal anesthesia (N = 3). During spinal anesthesia, higher stimulus intensities were required to evoke CEPs of similar amplitudes as before. Because CEPs evoked by stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve disappeared, but those evoked by spinal cord stimulation did not, it is concluded that spinal anesthesia is a result of blockade of nerve roots, not blockade of neural transmission within the cord. Therefore, diagnostic high spinal anesthesia cannot exclude an origin of pain within the spinal cord.
Adult↗
Transient neurologic syndrome in one thousand forty-five patients after 3% lidocaine spinal anesthesia.
UNLABELLED: Recent reports have discussed the potential risk of transient radicular irritation (TRI) after spinal anesthesia with lidocaine. Because we have not encountered such neurologic sequelae with the high incidence reported, we prospectively examined the incidence of TRI after spinal anesthesia with lidocaine. One thousand forty-five adult patients (aged 47 +/- 15 yr) receiving spinal anesthesia with 3% hyperbaric lidocaine (1.0-1.5 mL) for anorectal surgery were consecutively studied. After the induction of spinal anesthesia, all patients were placed in the prone position for surgery. Patients were evaluated for neurologic symptoms in the buttocks, thighs, or lower extremities using a checklist to standardize data collection. Although there was no complaint of neurologic symptoms on Postoperative Day (POD) 1, four patients (0.4%) reported aching, hypesthesia, numbness, or dull pain of both lower extremities and buttocks by the morning of POD 3. In three patients, the symptoms resolved without any treatment by POD 5, whereas in one patient, numbness of the lower extremities lasted until POD 7. We conclude that a combination of lidocaine with surgical position or leg manipulation during surgery might be a major contributing factor in the development of transient neurologic syndrome. IMPLICATIONS: Recent studies have reported the potential risk of transient neurologic syndrome after lidocaine spinal anesthesia. The current study reports a low incidence of such sequelae in 1045 patients undergoing anorectal surgery during the prone position. Other factors, such as surgical position, may be important in the development of this syndrome.
Adult↗
Spinal anesthesia in outpatient knee surgery: 22-gauge versus 25-gauge Sprotte needle.
Spinal anesthesia in day-care surgery is still controversial because of the possibility of postdural puncture headache (PDPH). The use of the Sprotte needle with a conical tip that spreads the dural fibers may reduce the incidence of PDPH. The aim of this study was to compare the 22-gauge and 25-gauge Sprotte needles with respect to PDPH and postoperative complaints in out-patients undergoing arthroscopy. The rate of spinal anesthesia failure and the feasibility of unilateral spinal anesthesia when using a low dose of anesthesia was also verified. For this randomized, prospective study, 234 patients undergoing elective arthroscopy were chosen. Patients were allocated randomly to have spinal anesthesia with either a 22-gauge or 25-gauge Sprotte needle. Dural puncture was performed with the patient in a lateral flexed decubitus position. After the injection of anesthetic solution (0.5-1.2 mL of 1% bupivacaine in 8% glucose) patients remained in the lateral decubitus position for 30 min. The time to regression of analgesia, time of micturition, and all postoperative complaints were recorded. The most frequent side effect was backache (10.2%) with a more frequent incidence in the group using the 22-gauge needle (14.5% and 5.9%, respectively). PDPH was recorded in only one patient (0.8%) in the group using the 22-gauge needle. The failure rate was 0.8%. Unilateral anesthesia was achieved in 88% of 213 patients. Our data indicate that the use of spinal block is a suitable technique in the ambulatory setting, with a low rate of unplanned hospital admission.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Adolescent↗
Changes in respiratory pattern and arterial blood gases during sedation with propofol or midazolam in spinal anesthesia.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate changes in respiratory pattern and arterial blood gases during sedation with propofol or midazolam in spinal anesthesia. DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: Operating room of a university-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: 40 ASA physical status I and II patients who required spinal anesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: Spinal anesthesia with tetracaine and subsequent sedation with propofol (n = 15), midazolam (n = 15), or placebo (n = 10) was performed. MEASUREMENTS: Respiratory pattern [rib cage contribution to the tidal volume (%RC) and phase shift between rib cage and abdominal movements (PSrc-ab)] with a respiratory inductive plethysmograph (Respigraph) and arterial blood gas analysis (pH, pO2, and pCO2) were recorded. MAIN RESULTS: Spinal anesthesia per se increased %RC by 35% without changing PSrc-ab values (1.00). Sedation with propofol and midazolam decreased %RC by 60% and by 40%, respectively. PSrc-ab increased in both groups following sedation, and the increase in this parameter was higher in the propofol group (1.12) than in the midazolam group (1.04). In the placebo group, %RC decreased by 20% without any change in PSrc-ab. The decrease in pO2 was more significant in the propofol group (65.1 mmHg) than in the midazolam (74.2 mmHg) and placebo (83.1 mmHg) groups. CONCLUSION: Significant decreases in %RC and pO2 during propofol sedation seem to depend on paradoxical respiration due, in part, to upper airway obstruction; therefore, attention should be directed to the respiratory pattern during sedation, especially with propofol.
Adult↗
Prevention of phantom sensations after spinal anesthesia.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Phantom limb sensation (PLS) after the spinal anesthesia is an unpleasant experience. The occurrence rate was 80 to 83 per cent from previous studies. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the incidence of PLS, comparing between placing the lower limbs in the neutral position when analgesic level reach L1 dermatome (L1 group) and T6 dermatome (T6 group). METHODS: Ninety ASA physical status I-II patients, 19-50 year of age, scheduled for lower abdominal surgery under spinal anesthesia were enrolled. Immediately after the spinal injection, the patients were placed supine with one of lower limbs flexed (both hip and knee) and the other kept straight in the neutral position. The analgesic levels were checked every minute; the flexed limbs were turned to the neutral position when the analgesic level reached L1 and T6, the L1 group and the T6 group respectively. The images of the lower limbs and patients' satisfactions were evaluated 15 minutes after the blockage. RESULTS: Twenty per cent of the patients in the L1 group experienced PLS of the flexed limbs while 82.2 per cent of the patients in the T6 group did (P<0.05). None of the patients in the L1 group felt unsatisfied with PLS, on the other hand, 11.1 per cent of the patients in the T6 group expressed their dissatisfaction and would like to have their limbs extended. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that by placing the lower limbs in the neutral position immediately after the spinal injection, before the unwanted positions are memorized, could effectively minimize phantom limb sensation after spinal anesthesia.
Adult↗
Infants tolerate spinal anesthesia with minimal overall autonomic changes: analysis of heart rate variability in former premature infants undergoing hernia repair.
Unlike adults, neonates tolerate high thoracic spinal anesthesia with minimal changes in heart rate (HR) and arterial blood pressure. To examine the potential autonomic regulatory mechanisms which may account for these findings, the relation between short-term heart rate variability (HRV) and respiratory activity was analyzed in a group of eight ASA grade II former premature infants undergoing high thoracic spinal anesthesia for inguinal hernia repairs. Quantitative measures of sympathetic (As) and parasympathetic (Ap) modulation of HR were derived. HR, arterial blood pressure, and a calibrated respiratory signal were recorded during 4.4-min stable epochs in eight subjects 1) preoperatively, 2) postincision after high thoracic spinal anesthesia, and 3) during an active sleep state in the postoperative period. Power spectral analysis of HRV and respiratory power yielded measures of low-frequency power (LFP: 0.02-0.15 Hz) and high-frequency power (HFP: 0.15-0.8 Hz). Transfer function analysis between respiratory activity and HR were used to quantify As and Ap. All subjects had successful high thoracic spinal anesthesia with highest levels ranging from C7-T4. Mean HR, blood pressure, and respiratory power did not change significantly with high thoracic spinal anesthesia. LFP and HFP both decreased significantly, whereas the LFP/HFP ratio remained stable. Group mean As and Ap both decreased, but the changes were not significant. Despite overall cardiovascular stability, HRV decreased with high thoracic spinal anesthesia, but the balance between LFP and HFP remained stable, suggesting that the reflex response to high thoracic spinal anesthesia was predominantly diminished parasympathetic modulation of cardiac function. The expected decrease in HR and blood pressure from the sympatholysis which results from high thoracic spinal anesthesia were apparently offset by withdrawal of cardiac vagal activity.
Anesthesia, Spinal↗
The effect of Pencan needle orientation on spinal anesthesia outcomes.
Slow resolution of block and incidence of side effects deter many practitioners from choosing spinal anesthesia for out-patient surgical procedures. Some studies suggest that controlling bevel or side port orientation of a spinal needle during anesthetic injection can affect occurrence of side effects and time to block resolution. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of varying Pencan spinal needle (B-Braun, Bethlehem, Pa) side port orientations on duration of block and incidence of side effects in groups of patients receiving spinal anesthesia. We randomized 87 subjects scheduled for spinal anesthesia to receive a spinal anesthesia injection using a cephalad, lateral, or caudad side port orientation. Onset, duration, block height, incidence of side effects, and analgesic requirements were among the variables measured. No difference in onset, duration, or analgesic requirements was noted among groups. Differences were noted in time to discharge from the hospital (P = .027) and time to first voiding (P = .023) in the lateral compared with the cephalad and caudad orientation groups. Patients in whom the lateral needle side port orientation was used for injection were discharged earlier and had fewer side effects. This could translate into significant savings, financially and in terms of staff requirements.
Adjuvants, Anesthesia↗
Influence of lumbosacral cerebrospinal fluid density, velocity, and volume on extent and duration of plain bupivacaine spinal anesthesia.
BACKGROUND: The current study was designed to investigate the influence of lumbosacral cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) density, velocity, and volume on the extent and duration of plain bupivacaine spinal anesthesia. METHODS: Forty-one patients scheduled to undergo orthopedic surgery with spinal block were enrolled. Lumbosacral CSF volumes were calculated from low thoracic, lumbar, and sacral axial magnetic resonance images. CSF velocity at the L3-L4 level was derived from phase-contrast magnetic resonance images. Spinal anesthesia was performed in the lateral decubitus position. CSF (2 ml) was sampled to measure CSF density before injection of 3 ml plain bupivacaine (0.5%). Statistical correlation coefficients (rho) between CSF characteristics and measurements of spinal anesthesia were assessed by Spearman rank correlation. In addition, stepwise multiple linear regression models were used to select important predictors of measures of spinal anesthesia. RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between CSF density and peak sensory block level (rho = 0.33, P = 0.034). Lumbosacral CSF volume inversely correlated with peak sensory block level (rho = -0.65, P < 0.0001) and positively correlated with onset time of complete motor block (rho = 0.42, P = 0.008). CSF volume also inversely correlated with time required for regression of the sensory block to L1 (rho = -0.35, P = 0.026) and L2 (rho = -0.33, P = 0.039). There was a significant inverse correlation between peak diastolic CSF velocity and duration of motor blockade (rho = -0.44, P = 0.005). Multiple regression analysis revealed that weight and CSF volume significantly contributed to the peak sensory block level (R2 = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that CSF density and volume influence the spread of spinal anesthesia with plain bupivacaine and that CSF volume also influences the duration of spinal anesthesia. CSF velocity might also influence the duration of plain bupivacaine spinal anesthesia.
Adult↗
[Spinal anesthesia for open reduction of tibial fracture in a patient with late cerebellar cortical atrophy].
We could successfully perform spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine for open reduction of tibial fracture in a patient with late cerebellar cortical atrophy (LCCA). LCCA is a very rare neurologic degenerative disorder localized chiefly in the cerebellum, and it may be followed by various complications. His postoperative course was uneventful, followed by no neurological complication. Regional anesthesia including spinal anesthesia seems to be safe for operations in patients with LCCA.
Anesthesia, Spinal↗
The incidence of transient radicular irritation after spinal anesthesia in obstetric patients.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Transient radicular irritation (TRI) has been described after spinal anesthesia, particularly with 5% hyperbaric spinal lidocaine. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of TRI in obstetric patients. METHODS: All obstetric patients undergoing spinal anesthesia during a 9-month period were enrolled in the study (n = 303). Details of the anesthetic technique were recorded at the time of anesthesia. A blinded anesthesia nurse contacted each patient on postoperative day 2 and asked about symptoms of TRI. RESULTS: Most patients received either intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.75 % (n = 232) or lidocaine 5 % (n = 67) through pencil-point needles. Cerebrospinal fluid was used to dilute the spinal lidocaine in 63% of patients. Patients receiving bupivacaine were more often in the supine position, underwent significantly longer procedures, and more often received intrathecal opioid. The incidence of TRI after lidocaine spinal anesthesia was 0% (95% confidence interval 0-4.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of TRI after spinal lidocaine anesthesia in the obstetric population is low.
Adult↗
Spinal anesthesia for elective lumbar spine surgery.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a large series of elective lumbar spine surgical procedures by a single surgeon whose patients were all offered spinal anesthesia. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary-care teaching hospital. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The records of all elective lumbar spine procedures between 1984 and 1995 performed by one surgeon (GRB) were obtained, and 803 were identified. Of those 803 patients, 611 accepted spinal anesthesia. Data collected included patient demographics, details of the spinal and general anesthesia, perioperative complications, and impact of the spinal anesthetic options on the outcome of spinal anesthesia. General and spinal anesthesia patients were comparable for age, gender, height, and ASA physical status. Patients who received spinal anesthesia were significantly heavier than the general anesthesia patients. Among perioperative complications, nausea and deep venous thrombosis occurred significantly more often in the general than spinal anesthesia patients. Mild hypotension and decreased heart rate (HR) were the most common hemodynamic changes with spinal anesthesia, whereas hypertension and increased HR were the result of general anesthesia. Among spinal anesthetic drugs, plain bupivacaine was associated with the lowest incidence of supplemental local anesthetic use intraoperatively compared to hyperbaric bupivacaine or hyperbaric tetracaine. CONCLUSION: Spinal anesthesia is an effective alternative to general anesthesia for lumbar spine surgery and has a reduced rate of minor complications.
Anesthesia, General↗
P6 acupressure does not prevent emesis during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.
Nausea and vomiting are major adverse effects during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Stimulation of the P6 (Neiguan) acupoint is a traditional Chinese acupuncture technique used for effective antiemetic purposes. In this study, we evaluated the antiemetic effect of P6 acupressure in parturients during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. In a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, 110 parturients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery were enrolled in the study. Thirty minutes before initiation of spinal anesthesia, parturients were randomized to acupressure bands or placebo bands bilaterally on the P6 acupoint and nausea and vomiting were observed over the study period. There were no statistically significant differences in maternal characteristics. Incidence rates for intraoperative nausea were 64% (acupressure group) and 71% (control group) (P = 0.416), with an incidence of intraoperative vomiting of 22% (acupressure group) and 27% (control group) (P = 0.506). The results suggest that prophylactic use of acupressure bands bilaterally on the P6 acupoint failed to prevent nausea and vomiting during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.
Acupressure↗