PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Capsule Endoscopy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 469 records · Page 26Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Laparoendoscopic techniques for occult gastrointestinal bleeding.

Up to 5% of gastrointestinal bleeds occur between the ligament of Treitz and the ileocecal valve. These patients present with occult bleeding and pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Currently, an array of technology exists for diagnostic purposes, including upper and lower endoscopies, capsule endoscopy, nuclear scans, angiography, and intraoperative endoscopy. All of these modalities have advantages and disadvantages. However, the diagnostic gold standard for occult gastrointestinal bleeding does not exist. We present a case of an 18-year-old male with occult gastrointestinal bleeding to illustrate the variety of available modalities. Initially, the patient underwent upper, lower, and push endoscopies. Subsequently, he had a nuclear bleeding scan, video capsule endoscopy, and an angiogram. Ultimately, the patient had a diagnostic laparoscopy with mobilization of the terminal ileum and right colon. The bowel was exteriorized and an intraoperative endoscopy was performed through a small bowel enterotomy. Multiple arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) were ascertained and resected. This case is presented in detail and the technique of intraoperative endscopy is reviewed. The diagnostic literature regarding AVMs is also reviewed.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Small bowel endoscopy.

Video capsule endoscopy continues to be the major focus in papers dealing with diagnostic small-bowel endoscopy. Although capsule endoscopy is used for a variety of indications, its major field of application is still obscure bleeding from the small intestine, where it can be regarded as a first-line test. There is increasing evidence that capsule endoscopy for suspected Crohn's disease may be diagnostic in individual cases after inconclusive conventional tests. Push enteroscopy is the clinical reality for biopsy and treatment in the proximal small bowel, whereas intraoperative enteroscopy is used for distal or diffuse small-intestinal disorders. Further reports on double-balloon enteroscopy suggest that this method may be able to replace at least intraoperative enteroscopy in many circumstances. The availability of specific antibody tests for celiac disease is leading to recurrent interest in endoscopy and histology, showing that villous atrophy and lymphocytic infiltrates are typical, but not specific, findings.

Capsules↗
PubMed2005

The evolution of endoscopy: wireless capsule cameras for the diagnosis of occult gastrointestinal bleeding and inflammatory bowel disease.

Occult gastrointestinal bleeding and lesions associated with inflammatory bowel disease represent a diagnostic dilemma because they often lie in areas of the small bowel that are difficult to access with flexible fiberoptic endoscopy. Capsule endoscopy has been developed to access these areas in a way that avoids the pain and anesthesia risks of push endoscopy. The diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy has proven to be superior to both flexible small-bowel endoscopy and radiologic studies in several prospective trials. Capsule endoscopy transmits a large number of images that do not correlate well with the standard endoscopic view, creating a diagnostic challenge for the endoscopist. Complications of this procedure include capsule retention in diverticulae or at stricture sites. The technology of this procedure continues to evolve through improving image resolution and diagnostic accuracy. Capsule endoscopy also represents an overall economic saving despite a high unit price compared with the expense of repeat diagnostic testing. Because the diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy is nearly twofold greater than conventional endoscopy, it has become the procedure of choice for the dilemma of assessing small-bowel pathology for many clinicians. Further studies are needed to determine whether the capsule endoscope can replace conventional endoscopy in the first-line diagnosis of pathology in other parts of the alimentary tract.

Capsules↗
PubMed2004

Wireless capsule video endoscopy: three years of experience.

AIM: To review and summarize the current literature regarding M2A wireless capsule endoscopy. METHODS: Peer reviewed publications regarding the use of capsule endoscopy as well as our personal experience were reviewed. RESULTS: Review of the literature clearly showed that capsule endoscopy was superior to enteroscopy, small bowel follow through and computerized tomography in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, iron deficiency anemia, or suspected Crohn's disease. It was very sensitive for the diagnosis of small bowel tumors and for surveillance of small bowel pathology in patients with Gardner syndrome or familial adenomatous polyposis syndrome. Its role in celiac disease and in patients with known Crohn's disease was currently being investigated. CONCLUSION: Capsule video endoscopy is a superior and more sensitive diagnostic tool than barium follow through, enteroscopy and entero-CT in establishing the diagnosis of many small bowel pathologies.

Contraindications↗
PubMed2004

Wireless capsule video endoscopy compared to barium follow-through and computerised tomography in patients with suspected Crohn's disease--final report.

BACKGROUND: Wireless capsule endoscopy is a superior diagnostic tool to barium small bowel follow-through and enteroscopy in diagnosing patients with occult blood loss. AIM: To compare capsule endoscopy with barium follow-through and entero-computerised tomography in patients with suspected Crohn's disease. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients with suspected Crohn's disease underwent the three examinations. The radiologist and gastroenterologist were blinded to each other's results. In cases of discrepancy, colonoscopy and ileoscopy were performed. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (22 males), mean age 28.4 years, were included. Eighty-eight percent had abdominal pain, 83% had diarrhoea and 69% had weight loss. The diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy was 77% versus 23% and 20% of barium and computerised tomography examinations, respectively (P < 0.05). The capsule detected all of the lesions diagnosed by barium follow-through and entero-computerised tomography. CONCLUSIONS: Capsule endoscopy is a superior and more sensitive diagnostic tool than barium follow-through and entero-computerised tomography in patients with suspected Crohn's disease.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Value of early capsular endoscopy for severe gastrointestinal bleeding.

This case illustrates the importance of early capsule endoscopy in cases of severe rectal bleeding when initial diagnostic tests do not document the site of bleeding. Although this case occurred in a community hospital capable of performing capsule endoscopy, I practice at a city hospital that serves the poor and underserved and currently does not have capsule endoscopy capability. Over the years, we have seen several cases of severe rectal bleeding where the site of bleeding was never identified, despite multiple diagnostic procedures short of capsule endoscopy. Often times, the bleeding stops spontaneously or ends in emergency surgery where morbidity or mortality is increased. Physicians like myself need to be made aware of this relatively new diagnostic tool that provides added value to standard diagnostic tests for evaluating severe rectal bleeding of unknown etiology. Early identification of the site of rectal bleeding may curtail the need for multiple transfusions, resolve economical burden, and reduce morbidity and mortality associated with severe rectal bleeding.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

PillCam ESO in esophageal studies: improved diagnostic yield of 14 frames per second (fps) compared with 4 fps.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Capsule endoscopy, using the PillCam ESO and sending images at a rate of 4 frames per second (fps), has a high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) lesions. We tested a new device which produces images at a rate of 14 fps. The diagnostic performance and esophageal visualization of these two devices were compared. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 42 patients with GERD symptoms and eight patients with a history of Barrett's esophagus had an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). All patients underwent capsule endoscopy of the esophagus within 1 hour prior to EGD. The first 25 patients had a capsule endoscopy examination with the 4-fps device. The following 25 patients underwent capsule endoscopy under identical conditions but using the 14-fps device. The reader of the capsule endoscopy study was blinded to the EGD findings. A diagnosis of GERD or Barrett's esophagus was established with EGD. The findings at capsule endoscopy were compared with the EGD findings. We also examined how frequently the esophagus in its entirety was visualized by these two devices. RESULTS: The 4-fps device diagnosed 16/19 cases of esophageal erosions or ulcers (sensitivity 84 %) and 6/8 cases of Barrett's esophagus (sensitivity 75 %). The 14-fps capsule diagnosed 16/16 cases of esophageal ulcers or erosions and 7/7 cases of Barrett's esophagus (sensitivity 100 %). The total diagnostic miss rate in the 4-fps group was 5/27 (18 %) whereas the diagnostic miss rate in the 14-fps group was 0/23 (0 %) P < 0.02). The upper esophageal sphincter (UES) was clearly identified in 6/25 patients (24 %) in the 4-fps group and in 20/25 patients (80 %) in the 14-fps group ( P < 0.01). The entire esophagus was well visualized in 3/25 patients (12 %) by the 4-fps device and in 19/25 (76 %) by the 14-fps device ( P < 0.01). The superiority of the 14-fps PillCam ESO capsule is consistent with the data obtained from fluoroscopic studies of swallowed PillCam capsules, showing that capsule speed may reach 20 cm/s. For the 14-fps PillCam this means one image transmitted per 3-cm segment at maximal capsule speed, therefore still allowing for full visualization of the entire esophagus. CONCLUSIONS: Capsule endoscopy using the 14-fps PillCam ESO showed a greater sensitivity than that of the 4-fps device for identifying GERD. The 14-fps PillCam ESO was statistically superior to the 4-fps device in visualizing the opening of the UES and the entirety of the esophagus.

Endoscopes, Gastrointestinal↗