PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Colonic Polyps”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 469 records · Page 26Linked to original sources
PubMed1986

Results of the removal of malignant colonic polyps.

Two-hundred-and-twenty-six patients, aged 26 to 80, had 238 malignant polyps removed. According to the WHO classification, only those lesions in which invasive growth is detected, are termed malignant polyps. Immediately after receiving the histological report, eight patients were operated on. Later, over periods of up to 18 months following the removal of polyps, eight more patients were operated upon for recurrences. The results of follow-up over periods of up to 10 years indicate the efficiency of endoscopic removal of malignant polyps irrespective of the grade of the invasive growth. Taking their experience as a basis, the authors suggest that the plan of approach to further stages of treatment should be based not on the pathological findings in the removed polyps, but on the results of regular follow-up of the patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Colonic polyps: complementary role of computer-aided detection in CT colonography.

PURPOSE: To apply a computer-aided detection (CAD) algorithm to supine and prone multisection helical computed tomographic (CT) colonographic images to confirm if there is any added benefit provided by CAD over that of standard clinical interpretation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT colonography (with patients in both supine and prone positions) was performed with a multisection helical CT scanner in 40 asymptomatic high-risk patients. There were two consecutive series of patients, 20 of whom had at least one polyp 1.0 cm in size or larger and 20 of whom had normal colons at conventional colonoscopy performed the same day. The CT colonographic images were interpreted with an automated CAD algorithm and by two radiologists who were blinded to colonoscopy findings. RESULTS: For 25 polyps at least 1.0 cm in size ("large" polyps), sensitivity for detection by at least one radiologist was 48% (12 of 25). The sensitivity of CAD for detecting large polyps was also 48% (12 of 25), but the CAD algorithm detected four of 13 large polyps that were not detected by either radiologist (31%, 95% two-sided CI: 9, 61), increasing the potential sensitivity to 64% (16 of 25). For polyps identifiable retrospectively, sensitivity of CAD was 67% (12 of 18), and sensitivity of the combination of detection with the CAD algorithm or by at least one radiologist was 89% (16 of 18). There were an average of 11 false-positive detections per patient for CAD. CONCLUSION: In this series of patients in whom radiologists had difficulties detecting polyps (compared with sensitivities of 75%-90% reported in the literature), this CAD algorithm played a complementary role to conventional interpretation of CT colonographic images by detecting a number of large polyps missed by trained observers.

Aged↗
PubMed1991

[Colonic polyps: clinical and practical implications].

Among colorectal polyps, various forms of neoplastic or non-neoplastic lesions are distinguished by histology. Most accumulated knowledge suggests that the majority of cancer of the colon arise in pre-existing benign neoplastic polyps (adenoma-carcinoma sequence). Because of the risk of cancer being already present, all adenomatous polyps must be removed in toto. The carcinoma may occupy only a small area of the polyp, and therefore, forceps biopsies are inappropriate due to the sampling error. Since patients with polyps detected by rectosigmoidoscopy often have further polyps in the remaining part of the colon, complete examination of the whole colon is required. Follow-up examinations are indicated, because the risk of developing new polyps is high. Studies of the life history of the adenoma-carcinoma sequence suggest that interval of complete large-bowel follow-up may be about 5 years. The policy of polypectomy and follow-up examinations should be possible to prevent the development of colorectal cancer.

Cell Transformation, Neoplastic↗
PubMed2006

Cancer risk in endoscopically unresectable colon polyps.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the current study was to define the rate of underlying malignancy in endoscopically unresectable polyps. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved review identified all patients undergoing colectomy for radiologically identified or endoscopically unresectable polyps between 1997 and 2006. Patients were included if the endoscopic impression and biopsy findings suggested an adenomatous polyp without invasive cancer. Patient information was abstracted. RESULTS: Eighty procedures in 79 patients were identified. Median patient age was 66 (range 38 to 85) years, and patients were predominately male (98%) and Caucasian (73%). The median endoscopic size of polyps was 3.0 cm (range 0.8 to 10 cm). Polyps were most frequently proximal to the splenic flexure (72%). Biopsy histology included 36 (51%) tubulovillous and villous adenomas. Invasive cancer was identified in 13 of 80 (16%) subsequent surgical specimens, but only 3 of 71 (4%) were lymph node-positive. Surgical morbidity was 37% and in-hospital mortality 3%. Size of polyp (P = .81) and histologic type (P = .34) were not significantly associated with invasive cancer. Compared with polyps proximal to the splenic flexure, polyps located distally were more likely to harbor malignancy (rate; P < .02), by both univariate and multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR] 1.38 [95% confidence interval 1.07 to 1.8]). CONCLUSION: The cancer risk in polyps deemed inappropriate for endoscopic resection was lower than previously reported. Neither polyp size nor histologic type appeared to be significantly associated with invasive cancer. Location of an endoscopically unresectable polyp distal to the splenic flexure confers an increased risk for occult malignancy.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

CT colonography: automated measurement of colonic polyps compared with manual techniques--human in vitro study.

PURPOSE: To prospectively investigate the relative accuracy and reproducibility of manual and automated computer software measurements by using polyps of known size in a human colectomy specimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained for the study; written consent for use of the surgical specimen was obtained. A colectomy specimen containing 27 polyps from a 16-year-old male patient with familial adenomatous polyposis was insufflated, submerged in a container with solution, and scanned at four-section multi-detector row computed tomography (CT). A histopathologist measured the maximum dimension of all polyps in the opened specimen. Digital photographs and line drawings were produced to aid CT-histologic measurement correlation. A novice (radiographic technician) and an experienced (radiologist) observer independently estimated polyp diameter with three methods: manual two-dimensional (2D) and manual three-dimensional (3D) measurement with software calipers and automated measurement with software (automatic). Data were analyzed with paired t tests and Bland-Altman limits of agreement. RESULTS: Seven polyps (<or=6-mm diameter) could not be extracted by using the software; 20 polyps (5-15-mm diameter) remained for analysis. Automated measurement was not significantly different from histologic size for the experienced reader (mean difference, 0.63 mm; P=.06) or novice reader (mean difference, 0.58 mm; P=.12). With manual 2D measurement and manual 3D measurement, the experienced reader (1.21-mm mean difference, P<.001, and 0.68-mm mean difference, P=.03, respectively) and novice reader (1.54-mm mean difference, P<.001, and 0.84-mm mean difference, P=.002, respectively) significantly underestimated polyp size. Interobserver agreement was good and similar for all three methods (95% limits of agreement span, approximately 2.5 mm). Intraobserver agreement was related to reader experience, with differences of up to 2.5 mm within expected limits of agreement. CONCLUSION: For polyps smaller than 1 cm, measurement differences of up to 2.5 mm are within the expected limits of inter- and intraobserver agreement for all measurement techniques. Automated and manual 3D polyp measurements are more accurate than manual 2D measurements.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

[Colonoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of small colonic polyps].

The results of treatment of 801 patients are analysed. It is shown that the probability of growth and the development of new adenomas or a recurrence of the disease is higher in patients with multiple small polyps and in their combination with larger structures. Therefore, all multiple structures in the colon, irrespective of their size, must be removed endoscopically without fail and the patients kept under dynamic control subsequently. Solitary small polyps show no tendency to grow, in view of which the therapeutic tactics in such cases should be individualized and determined by the histological structure of the growth themselves and the character of the changes in the colon.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Benefits of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for colon polyps: a case-matched series.

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the true benefits of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy by comparing clinical outcomes from a series of laparoscopic right colectomies with matched open colectomies, all performed for the singular indication of polyp not amenable to colonoscopic removal. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective case-matched study was performed of consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy for polyps between January 1992 and July 1997. Each case was matched to a control undergoing the equivalent open procedure for the same indication during the same time period. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy for polyps were identified, and matches were found. The conversion rate was 18.4% (7/38), 21.4% early in the series and 10% in later experience. Operative times were longer for laparoscopic-associated colectomy (median, 208 minutes vs 150 minutes, P < .001). Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy resulted in shorter postoperative ileus (time to flatus, 3.0 vs 4.0 days, P < .001; time to bowel movement, 3.5 vs 5.0 days, P < .001) and in earlier tolerance of regular diet (3.5 vs 6.0 days, P < .001). Fewer days of narcotic administration were required by the laparoscopic group (3.0 vs 4.5 days, P < .001). This resulted in a significantly shorter length of hospital stay (4.0 vs 7.0 days, P < .001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy has significant patient benefits. These benefits are apparent when procedures of equal complexity and equivalent indications are compared. Laparoscopic-assisted resection has become our preferred approach for polyps not amenable to colonoscopic polypectomy.

Aged↗
PubMed1987

Management of endoscopically removed malignant colon polyps.

The medical records of 87 patients with 89 malignant colorectal polyps removed endoscopically between 1971 and 1983 were reviewed retrospectively. Fifty-five polyps contained carcinoma-in-situ. Four polyps had "pseudo-invasion" by displaced mucosal glands. Thirty polyps contained invasive carcinoma. No patients with carcinoma-in-situ or "pseudo-invasion" had either local residual disease or metastatic disease at the time of colectomy or which was detected during subsequent follow-up. Four patients (14%) with invasive cancer would have been inadequately treated by polypectomy alone, since one had residual disease at the polypectomy site, one had nodal metastases, one had liver metastases at the time of colectomy, and one subsequently developed liver metastases. Three histologic criteria correctly predicted all four cases where residual or recurrent disease was present: involvement of the polypectomy resection margin, lymphatic invasion within the polyp, and poorly differentiated histology. Polyp size, histology (villous adenoma, adenomatous polyp, or villo-adenomatous polyp), or anatomic location did not identify those patients who warranted further therapy. We conclude that polypectomy alone is adequate treatment for polyps containing carcinoma-in-situ. Polypectomy alone is also adequate treatment for most polyps containing invasive carcinoma. However, patients with lymphatic involvement within the polyp, poorly differentiated cancer, or resection margin involvement should probably undergo colectomy.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Computed tomography colonography: automated diameter and volume measurement of colonic polyps compared with a manual technique--in vitro study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate inter- and intraobserver agreement of automated measurement of polyp diameter in vitro. METHODS: Two phantoms ("QRM" and "Whiting") containing simulated polyps of known diameter and volume were scanned using 16-detector row computed tomography. Two observers estimated polyp diameter using 3 methods: software calipers ("manual"), freehand boundary identification ("semiautomatic"), and automated software segmentation ("fully automatic"). RESULTS: Intraobserver 95% limits of agreement for diameter were narrowest for the fully automatic method (QRM span: 0.39 mm, 0.48 mm; Whiting span: 0.24 mm, 0 mm). Manual estimates were approximately 10 times wider (QRM span: 3.57 mm, 3.21 mm; Whiting span: 3.2 mm, 2.02 mm). Volume estimates were narrowest for the fully automatic method (span: 24.2 mm, 24.1 mm vs. 97.9 mm, 102.9 mm for semiautomatic measurement). Interobserver agreement for diameter was narrowest for the fully automatic method (QRM span: 0.12 mm, Whiting span: 0.16 mm), with the manual method approximately 18 times wider (QRM span: 2.87 mm, Whiting span: 2.18 mm). CONCLUSION: Fully automated measurement of polyp diameter and volume is technically feasible and results in superior inter- and intraobserver agreement.

Colonic Polyps↗
PubMed1993

Are endoscopic measurements of colonic polyps reliable?

Many clinical studies of colorectal adenomatous polyps rely on endoscopic estimation of polyp size. To examine the reliability of such measurements, we conducted a study using artificial polyps in an endoscopy teaching model. Eight experienced endoscopists estimated the size of 13 polyps in two separate sessions 2 wk apart. Endoscopic estimates of polyp size tended to be significantly lower than the true polyp size for all polyps and all endoscopists at both sessions. We also found a statistically significant difference in the magnitude of the underestimation between the first and second session (p < 0.0001). At the first session, polyps tended to be estimated at 64% of their true size, and at the second session, the estimates tended to be at 77% of the actual polyp size. We estimate the magnitude of the variation in polyp measurements due to individual polyps, endoscopist, and examination session, and discuss the impact these sources of variation have in planning of clinical trials.

Colonic Neoplasms↗
PubMed2004

Laparoscopic treatment of colonic polyps.

In any large practice, some patients will be identified with polyps that are unable to be safely removed with a colonoscope. For those few polyps that cannot be endoscopically managed, laparoscopic techniques provide a safe and attractive option. They have the potential to decrease patient discomfort and length of stay and still provide adequate oncologic treatment of these potentially malignant lesions.

Colectomy↗